About Radio Program (VI) ---- 有关广播剧（六）
Chinese version
Chronicle Note
**I have not heard one single episode of this radio program myself for a lot of reasons. To do a radio program majorly featuring me was discussed on 07/01/2004 conference call. The radio program has been produced by United States 106.7FM or Clear Channel and on air since 2005??suppose??. I am a Chinese, the major featured person(suppose). Following are what I gathered from impacts of being the major featured person and may not correct. Please contact me at somebodyinMA@gmail.com if the content is seriously incorrect and please provide references including broadcasting channel and time, thanks forward.
12-31-2017 My lawfully owned private wealth and My name in People's Republic of China (关于我合法拥有的财产以及我方敏在中华人民共和国的名誉）
Heard this morning's talk about being a Mistress.
My response: Exactly, Why would a wealthy Miss P ever need to fight for the acknowledgment of a "true birth mother" of another wealthier person's child without a marriage through a radio program producers' help? Why would a Military breed need to hide a marriage with another enlisted from the possible ex? That is if she is a wealthy Miss P and a Military breed.
That is the reason I said who need her to hide her marriage? And why anyone would assume the wife, the possible ex, did not know anything at all?
The money she claimed she born into is the money I born into by the laws, that is the reason I inherited it in 2004 and I am the person kept calling laws' help when she kept on insisting to request other people's favor to have some money transferred to her.
Exactly, if the Fund in "her disputes only" is the money she born into, why would she need to request people outside of the fund to do her some favors to have some money transferred to her? Why can't she call laws' help like I did?
I was called into an attorney's office without a clue about money and effectively inherited my trusts my birth grandfathers set up for me before I was even born, I could effectively spend money by saying "I want this" and decide my providing as I wish over the phone in an attorney's office in Connecticut, and I am complaining to the laws where is my money currently after she "requested some favors" successfully. All because it is my money.
Heard this morning's talk about what is wrong with her having her own money.
My response: It would be wrong if that money she called her own money is actually my own money. If that is my money by Laws, I refuse to enjoy this female sexually and I refuse to let this female to fancy my own money can be called her own money. I insist on calling that is my own money.
----published on Dec. 29th, 2017
Argument about Jessica Petroves(Pejoves) money (Second item)
----Dec. 31st, 2017
听说了今天早上的广播提到了海外华裔社区的很多传言。
我的回应：我也是认为是真是假都应该让中国人民共和国国内的中国公民们听到然后再予以核实，否则实在是太吓人了。
今天早上提到的一些传言我也有听说，但没在此博客公布。我确实是唐太宗李世民的继承人，但我已经是美国公民了，不适合就中国内政畅言，或因为过度关心而引发一些“企图利用唐太宗李世民继承人身份干涉中国政府或者中国内政”的指控。
就美国公民阿尔贝特·高尔及其华人妻子（或者孩子妈）通过广播剧制作声明进行针对我方敏个人的羞辱谩骂及财产掠夺，我已求助美国警方，一切按照美国法律已在处理当中。
就传言阿尔贝特·高尔的妻子（或者孩子妈）以中国政府名义针对我方敏的私人合法利益及私人合法权益所做声明全部是无效的假声明，我已求助美国警方，一切按照美国法律已在处理当中。
就传言阿尔贝特·高尔的华人妻子（或者孩子妈）以中国政府名义宣布一些中国政府的决定，包括通过广播剧宣布的不准我方敏入境中华人民共和国就因中国国家领导人有的是女人奶子屁股，在中国政府没有任何否认即予以全部默认的情况下，我方敏认为一切都是中华人民共和国政府的正式声明。我方敏保留一切追究以中华人民共和国政府名义破坏我方敏名誉的行为的法律责任，只要中华人民共和国有一天能够恢复法治国家信誉， 只要中华人民共和国的政府有一天恢复中国政府是一个领导13亿人口的国家职能机关而非一些个别人的私家妓院的理解，我方敏一定寻求在中华人民共和国司法保障下的，在中华人民共和国960万平方公里领土领海和领空，中国政府海外各领事和中国政府各驻外机构，以及中国政府在公共海域及公共空域的机构和设施，全面恢复我唐太宗李世民继承人方敏的名誉。
我重复我今天早上所言， 我不清楚阿尔贝特·高尔的华人妻子（或者孩子妈）是否已是美国公民，但我已是美国公民，就中华人民共和国政府是否是在美国公民阿尔贝特·高尔或其华人妻子（或者孩子妈）的实际领导之下，我方敏没有任何看法也没有任何想法。
*已经听说中国各入境港口已在当天接到广播剧制作团队中方国内广播电台宣传团队人员的最高指示，所有中华人民共和国的边防军警人员必须执行广播剧制作团队里中国广播电台的中方工作人员所下达的不准方敏入境的命令。
----2017年12月31日。
12-30-2017 Is radio company's CEO the person who understand this "I am his real woman to deserve that unwanted woman's money"
Heard this morning's talk about how my computer technology achievement was evaluated by a radio CEO.
My response: This is the typical PRC80 style. Throwing a universal comment in a tone that is authoritative which certainly promoted commenter a superior role in judging the matter to audience group who are not aware what is going on.
I heard it was the CEO of IheartRadio made that comment to say that I am impossible can have computer technology achievement by stating in an assertive tone:" I say ....". But the problem is he can't be assertive with any reasonable grounds on matters if I have computer technology achievement or if I have my own inherited wealth from my own birth grandfathers.
His insider knowledge of who is truly David Petraeus' wife is not the the knowledge of anything about who the Chinese woman Min Fang in Boston is, which includes authentication knowledge about my trusts I inherited from my birth grandfathers or the authentication evaluation of my own intelligence as well as my education, just because all of these have nothing to do with David Petraeus or his relatives or his marriage status. It is rumored that announced child is the child registered in David Petraeus' family business' capital accounts registry as announced on the radio program.
I did hear some rumors that his split with his ex-wife may be the reason how he thinks about my wealth's deservedness. The problem is I was never married to all these so deserved males but announced as never wanted by every one of them which is unlike whatever his own experience might be.
Regarding the question that has been used as the reason to rob Min Fang's money "If I have a child with that Chinese woman Min Fang, will I be able to have some money", the answer is absolutely NOT. Becuase Chinese woman Min Fang made it very clearly in 2004 that during entrust time, only Min Fang's biological own born children (each of them) can have Min Fang's money as inheritable or provided for by Min Fang's money. Min Fang is famous for not willing to let anyone just seed some children to take the money and throw the children out, and Min Fang is famous for very well protected on this matter that no one can take Min Fang's money without violating laws to commit some crimes.
And it is rumored that his wife's cousin, the famous rape-alike victim of a rumored F families-gathering-sex, actually mothers a child from a Mr. P. who wants to own my inheritance Fund from my own birth grandfather (my third year's providing fund) may be another reason.
Also it is rumored that Albert Gore illegal appended his name next to the second biggest investor of the radio company in computer registry system internally at the time when the radio company was renamed to reflect this "I heart radio" desire*, so hidden that this record can only be seen by a computer person or only be seen with a computer person's help.
My first year's providing officially started from Christmas of 2014. Of course, I had been provided for to cover some of my expenses before Christmas of 2014.
Also, about that my father's fake first born Beijing woman. It is rumored that my father was in Beijing on a business trip a week before she was conceived in 1965 or so is the reason for the argument that "she may be born a week after due-date". But according to the satellite-image records, my father did not even visit her mother nor visit her mother's office at all during that entire business trip.
*It is rumored the appended name was not authorized by the valid legal documentation of lawful ownership of the registered investment share. I did tip the law enforcement's about similar rumors over a year ago.
Reference on PRC80 style.
2-29-2017 What is PRC80 Style and Background of P.R.China in the 1980s
----Dec. 30th, 2017
12-29-2017 "True Beggar" is the PRC80 Scheme Style and background of P.R.China in the 1980s (中文附后）
Heard this morning's "body and life (including every penny and all benefits) with the wife, but soul.."
My response: Who needs that invisible, and untouchable big huge SOUL that resides in the body and represented by the life (including every penny and all benefits) to afloat somewhere else? Definitely not my any place. I reject this announced idea completely.
It only sounds creepy considering the female, who owns the announcer's body and life, has been minded so hugely about any association. The announcer must have been infected from the hard-earned PSYCHO titled female.
I heard that this whole week's featured episodes reflected a lot of people's frustration for the past 10 years "Are they (featured patrons) Alzheimer patients?" And my frustration has been: "That is a hard-earned psycho title". The theme should be called:"Do you hear what I hear? Alzheimer or psycho?"
the PRC80 Scheme practicing on Smartphone invention money (first and third item)
----Dec. 29th, 2017
Heard this morning's talk about what is wrong with her having her own money.
My response: It would be wrong if that money she called her own money is actually my own money. If that is my money by Laws, I refuse to enjoy this female sexually and I refuse to let this female to fancy my own money can be called her own money. I insist on calling that is my own money.
Argument about Jessica Petroves(Pejoves) money (Second item)
----Dec. 29th, 2017
Heard this morning broadcasted "I would rather advise you to call yourself a true beggar".
My response: This is the advice I gave according to PRC80 Scheme style that was out of being so annoyed with the non-stop harassment that "she is the one have The Money". I was like "why took my money and tried to paint me a beggar?"
This is obviously to shit somebody. Some PRC80 Scheme style advises are not this obvious. Example: Everyone is curious if I have money under entrust, why do I choose to be homeless? I said I didn't choose but advised, and I did call law enforcement's help to find out who advised me. I heard recently that it was advised by a Chinese male, I heard he was featured a possible heir from Zu's family on the radio program this year. His last name is also Fang(方) but he has no blood association with me at all.
That advise he gave sounds malicious who knew what this advise means, but not a bit to someone like me who know nothing about what it would be like to be a "homeless". It was sound like an adventure to me.
The key is if you know what the advise means. For example, if the advice of "just amputate the entire leg" is given when one is complaining about own leg pain, the one being advised certainly know immediately that is malicious. But if the same effect advises is given as "just stop local blood circulation completely to lower the sensitivity of the nerves", it may be taken without any guards.
This is the PRC80 Scheme advise style. Most of the time, this kind advises are given to promote advisers to make some gains, sometimes, this kind advises are given purely just out of hatred.
----Dec. 29th, 2017
Background of the 1980s in the People's Republic of China
1980s time in the People's Republic of China was like a no-law country with a lot of issues. Due to the national economic system conversion from the planned economy to the market economy, the main economic system was spinning out workers without any possible chances for those been spanned out to find a way to survive (no pension, no social security and not a chance to find a job*).
A lot of people were, possibly, desperately trying to find some resources to support their families. Some took advantage of the government's policies of encouraging private business. And in this process, tons of people being taken advantages of without knowing what happened which may include college professors or Science Academy Scientists' inventions or patents, etc. 1989 student movement may be the outbreak of a lot of tensions but somehow missed the points.
* In the 1980s, there were not many foreign investments yet. Healthy business (factory or company) were selected to be kept in the main economic system, the less or no profiting ones were spanned out, either to be independent or up for sale. So if a worker was laid off, it was because the factory or company could not afford to pay the salary (wage), and those businesses in the main system only recruit newly graduated from junior high schools, high schools or colleges. So, for the laid-off workers, it means no retirement pension from the factory or the company that laid this worker off, no social security from the government and not a chance to find a job, the laid-off worker could invest some money to become a street vendor or could buy a for-sale factory (company), or this laid-off worker would just have no place to turn to have any income.
* I graduated from high school in 1985 and graduated from a 5-years' pharmacology major from a medical college in 1990. I came to the United States in October 1996. I was the person reported to the then Chinese central government in early 1989 that 1989 Student movement against some government officials' corruption was suspicious because there was no reported major corruption case at all in 1988-1989 that could cause such outbreak. I was the person participated 1989's government meeting and gave my advises as an in-college Communist Youth Party member student to the government that led by Chinese Communism Party which shaped government's handling of 1989 student movement.
* I was the person pointed out in that 1989 meeting, organized by the Chinese government, that students' marching and blocking the streets activities would drag some healthy business into less profiting situation that may further worsen already pretty bad economic situation and cause more workers to be laid-off into financial desperation. And I was the person reported that collection of the donations from the streets were suspicious.
----Dec. 29th, 2017
八十年代的中华人民共和国背景介绍：
八十年代的中华人民共和国就像是一个无法无制的国家有着很多的问题。当时是国家的主要经济体制是在由计划经济在向市场经济的转型阶段，国家的主要经济体制当时是在逐步释放一些经济效益不太的企事业单位的职工，但没有考量到下岗人员的再就业选择，造成下岗人员基本上就没有任何实质上的身存之道（没有退休金，没有社保金，更没有机会再去找一份工作）。
当时很多人估计真是拼了命的想办法找点钱来养家糊口，还有些一些人或是响应了或是利用了中国政府当时鼓励“让一些人先富裕起来“的政策。在这个过程当中，有很多的人是被某名其妙的占了便宜（甚至有可能是被无偿掠夺了），中间有可能包括一些大学教授或是中科院科研人员的研究发明及专利，等等。1989年的学生运动可能是由于这些矛盾所产生的愤怒爆发，但1989年的学生运动所表达的愤怒没有切题，而且离题很远。
* 在八十年代，当时没有什么台资或外资或合资企业。效益好的企业（工厂或者公司）都被政府选择留在了中国当时的主要经济体制内，效益不好的企业或者亏损的企业被选择为独立核算，自负盈亏企业，或者被标价出售，属中国的主要体制外企事业单位。所以当时如果一个职工下岗的话，那是因为企业无钱支付这个职工的工资，而中国的主要经济体制内企业当时只招收应届或者前一年毕业的初高中及大学毕业生。所以，对于被下岗的职工来说，这就意味着没有退休金，没有政府保障的社保金，更是没有任何机会可以再找一份工作。这个下岗人员当时是可以投资做个个体户，或者买下一家标价出售的工厂公司，或者就是没有任何地方可以求助有一份养家的收入。
* 我是1985年高中毕业后于1990年自五年制的医学院药理专业毕业。我是1996年10月移居美国。是我1989年向当时的中国政府举报1989年反贪污反腐败学生运动很可疑。在1988年-1989年期间根本就没有任何重大贪污腐败案件的报道会引发如此大规模的愤怒表达。是我在1989年参加当时中国政府组织的全国高校会议并在会上以在读共青团员大学生的身份向中国共产党领导下的中国政府提出了一些处理89年学运的建议。 这些建议被中国政府参考并据此产生了1989年中国政府对当时学生运动的处理办法。
*是我在1989年中国政府组织的高校会议上指出学生游行阻街行为会造成一些效益好的企业也变成效益不好企业，进一步恶化当时已经很糟糕的经济环境从而造成更多的职工下岗而陷入家庭经济绝境。是我在会议上汇报说街上收集的捐款下落可疑。
----2017年12月29日。
12-28-2017 Who is "the United States Government" and the PRC80 Scheme practicing on Smartphone invention money
Heard yesterday and today that messages both impressively were from the United States government.
My response: I heard about it yesterday late in the day, so I explain it here today.
Yesterday's reason was Albert Gore, he very politely addressed himself "was a Vice President of the United States for a reason", but his current "decision" that I don't deserve to be acknowledged as part of smartphone creator group is still the "decision from the United States government". Otherwise, this is purely U.S. intellectual properties related laws matter, not the United States' national matter that needs the United States government decision.
This morning's "government decision" is from treasure department conversation that some Chinese government representatives conclusion of the discussion became "the United States government decision". This recording technique was helped by the David Petraeus' family name. This family name has been the name of a lot of this type "helping hands" on radio program producing and beyond.
It was announced by a Mr. Lewis from Treasury Department that I do not qualify for disability which is a true statement. In 2004's meeting, I did say I may qualify to apply taxpayers' money of disability help. Thanks to my great psychologist, I won't be qualified to apply for taxpayers' help on disability.
There was some confusion if that conversation means I need to be disabled to be provided for by my own money, my clarification on that is certainly untrue. I own my own money is the reason I am already qualified to be provided by it. And by the legal documentation attached to the providing that is appended to the regular donation, there certainly has no such conditions that I have to be a "psycho" to be qualified for providing.
I did provide some references related to my inheritance together with my social security assistance application to the Social Security Administration.
----Dec. 28th, 2017
Heard this morning's argument about Jessica Petroves'(Pejoves?) money.
My response: She is the announced mother of David Petraeus' child.
The money in this morning's disputes was never owned by this Jessica Petroves'(Pejoves?) birth mother or this Jessica Petroves (Pejoves?) birth mother's family.
The money in this morning's disputes was never owned by this Jessica Petroves'(Pejoves?) birth father or this Jessica Petroves (Pejoves?) birth father's family.
If this Jessica Petroves(Pejove?) has a birth father who is(was) not this Jessica Petroves (Pejoves?) birth mother's lawful husband, the money in this morning's disputes was never owned by this Jessica Petroves'(Pejoves?) birth mother's lawful husband or this Jessica Petroves (Pejoves?) birth mother's lawful husband's family.
The money in this morning's disputes was never owned by this Jessica Petroves'(Pejoves?) at the time this Jessica Petroves(Pejoves?) was born.
The money in this morning's disputes was never owned by this David Petraeus' family or any of his relatives.
The money in this morning's disputes is my providing money lawfully provided for my exclusive usage.
----Dec. 28th, 2017
How a law professional Albert Gore can be the Computer Science professional-evaluation eligible?
My response: Just because he declared himself "was a Vice President that led the United States for a reason".
By rumor, Albert Gore has fathered a Chinese diplomat's child and married her in P.R.China recently (registry marriage). That Chinese diplomat is the Chinese wife that Albert Gore announced he is married to on the radio program.
And if you ask around in Chinese Mainland Community, what he did is a typical and famous 1980s Chinese Iron-Steel business style: squeeze himself into the smartphone contributing group by crediting his contribution of pointing out I am being the fake one in order to take some money from Smartphones' business contributing shares.
The illustration of typical 1980s Chinese Iron-Steel business style is: whenever and wherever and whoever, as long as there is a conversation talking about a possible money-making business, a complete irrelevant person would seek chance to be in the conversation either by throwing a universal applicable commenting line to "contribute" or to exclude someone already in the conversation group. This is to ensure to have a good reason to have some money share and to reduce possible sharing parties.
Now, trying to remember what was broadcasted yesterday, and analyze the points that Albert Gore pointed out: I am a commenting party that is a fake contributor. He knew this was because he was a Vice President that led the United States for a reason.
I was the person initiated the conversation of smartphones by alerting everyone that there were some new inventions of mini-computer hardware from Intel company. And the conversation continued on how to use these new inventions to make a cellphone a smartphone. I am the original in-conversation group that Albert Gore trying to exclude, and I already accused him took my share of smartphone invention fee deposited into his own possession or gave out as he wished since 2007 or so.
Almost every one of my intellectual income, I earned it by initiating the conversation of having the business and also earned it by contributing on how to make it a good business.
Now, trying to remember what the Taiwanese woman, Wang, Xuehong*(王雪红), said yesterday about her contribution in there: She was an MBA graduated, and her husband is electronic engineering professional that knew cellphone chips. It was a smartphone invention that was discussed, not some computer software programming, it is impossible that I can contribute anything in there. It is obviously the same technique.
And if you heard she, by rumors, was the famous person known for "deserved to be in any smartphone conversation with a camcorder to record everyone's discussion", you knew this is the same the People's Republic of China Iron-Steel business style: "I already heard your information, I do not need your any contribution." which implies you are ousted from any possible profiting from what has been recorded. Her father was known for having some investments in the People's Republic of China since 1980 or so.
*Not certain if the name is correct. The father is Wang, Yongqing(王永庆），I am not certain which daughter.
----Dec. 28th, 2017
12-27-2017 Why entertainment professionals deserve to evaluate non-entertainment achievement on this radio program?
Heard this morning's Taiwanese woman's comment on how could I possibly have intellectual income from smartphones.
My response: A lot of people were there with her knew she was the one never contributed a bit but accused by me of attempting to steal the intellectual contributions from everyone else. Being a non-computer or non-electronics professional-background person, how she can possibly evaluate if I contributed into the discussion when Bill Gate (DOS system Inventor), Paul Ellen (Window system Inventor), and Steve Jobs(Mac system Inventor) were the ones in that same discussion on June 30th, 2004.
Please check following related blog article:
why the People's Republic of China's government insist on I am a fake (Second and Fourth Items in the post)
I have this huge problem with this radio program's producing efforts. They are the group can relate a creator's role in movie making, but how they can be eligible to evaluate if anyone is a creator's role in other industries?
Please check following related blog article:
Second Item: Heard about confusion how intellectual contributions can be appropriately acknowledged and rewarded.
----Dec. 27th, 2017
Heard this morning's broadcasting of a private hearing that happened in 2006 or 2007.
My response: It has been understood worldwide including my own that Albert Gore, David Petraeus and British Prince William are the ones that have huge problems with me, and plus that announced mothers of each of all three's young children want my money to be called their own money.
Kate Middleton announced in 2015 or in 2016 time that my inheritance Fund, the British East India Company Financier Fund, should be called hers to own. I refused.
Jessica Petroves (Pejoves?), announced mother of David Petraeus' child, announced in 2017 time that she deserves my another inheritance Fund which a Ford Holding's investor Fund. I refused.
A Chinese former or current diplomat who mothers an Albert Gore's younger child announced tons of owner deservedness in People's Republic of China government's name and/or in her own name, plus tons of ownerships announced by Albert Gore himself. I refused all.
"What will happen if a wife or a Mistress is not getting along with a Dowager or an heiress? It is understood as the husband or the gentleman lover who is the person that does not get along with the Dowager or the heiress. So it is the same as a Dowager or an heiress does not get along with the husband or the gentleman."
----Published on Dec. 26th, 2017
----Dec. 27th, 2017
How my inheritance Fund, the British East India Company Financier Fund, can be announced as Kate Middleton's wedding gift?
My response: By rumor, it was announced by Kate Middleton's romantically involved ex-boyfriend Albert Gore. But the Fund was never owned by Albert Gore. So it was just the illegal and invalid announcement.
What happened was a producer or two invited Albert Gore to the radio program's recording studio and provided him the radio program's microphone to announce such announcement. It was never from anyone that my trust related or the British East India Company Financier Fund's management related. It was purely an announcement made by Kate Middleton's romantically involved ex-boyfriend Albert Gore for her then-upcoming public wedding with some of the radio program's producers' help. And I refuse to consider to make it real.
The British East India Company Financier Fund was never a no-owner fund even with a mandatory law in 1900 time that said any trust over 500 years without a known owner should be a no-owner Fund, because the British East India Company Financier Fund has been famously owned by a French parent Fund entire time since the British East India Company Financier Fund has been set up. And this French fund is owned by another Fund in another country since the French Fund has been set up.
Petroves or Pejoves family's story related Fund is the same that it has been famously owned by another French Fund the entire time since that British Fund has been set up. And the French Fund is owned by another Fund in another country since the French Fund has been set up.
Tons of radio program's announcements have been announced in such invalid way. Rumored Boston's Magic 106.7FM radio station's female manager was announced by a Jessica Lopez this same way that actually effectively ousted radio station's then in-office male CEO and promoted the female a CEO in 2014 time.
Since 2014, it has been rumored that this radio program has been argued why its featured stories have to be real stories. And it is well-known I have not been to Britain yet, not to mention seduce a British Prince as featured on the radio program. I know how much shits threw at me by "no need to be really my stories", but I do not know how many "radio program's announcements to gain ownership" have to be effective since this radio program went on-air in 2005.
I refuse to acknowledge any of all those radio program's never-authorized-announcements that is related to who I am or what I own or what I have achieved. I did call law enforcement's help on those announcements that have been illegally transacted.
https://chroniclenote.blogspot.com/2017/12/12-19-2017.html
----Dec. 27th, 2017
About my daily providing that announced this morning "No American should support my living cost".
My response: I am not supposed to be supported by anyone but myself.
Rumored Jessica Lopez, a resident New Haven of Connecticut is the person has some huge sayings over my housing and my cash or food providing by being so influential to Boston Housing Authority and Boston Transition Department. The husband she announced on the radio has nothing to do with me, and the real reason of her power is because she is the person "radio program announcement promoted" Boston's Magic 106.7FM radio station's female manager.
Currently, those providing whereabouts from my trusts are still being "investigated". I only received housing arrangement paid for years from my first year's providing, no food or cash received yet. Rumored, my second year's transferred to Tina O'Connor and my third year's transferred to Jessica Petroves(Pejoves) by a Hispanic Treasure Department employee who never heard of any stories about these two famous British Royals most wanted British Funds. Both transferred after radio program's announcement of "Chinese woman does not deserve any O'Connor money or any Petroves(Pejoves) money."
I am currently having Food stamps and some SSI help other than housing. Food Stamps I received is because of "poverty" and SSI I received is because I have been really "agitated".
*My second year's providing American Fund is owned by the same French Fund that owns the British East India Company Financier Fund, never O'Connors' money.\
*My third year's providing American fund is owned by a French Fund that also owns the other famous British Royals most wanted Fund, never Pejoves' or Petroves' money.
*My fourth year's providing American Fund, currently has not paid out my living expense yet, is owned by a French Fund that never owned by David Petraeus' family nor any of his relatives.
----Dec. 27th, 2017
12-26-2017 Pants-off prostituting group is not the authenticating power of my matter
Heard this morning's confusion who is eligible to have a saying over what.
My response: What else would one expect when saying over another person's business, other than "I told you I refuse to fxxx you..." from another person. It is purely another person business, not this or that person to say at all unless...
----Dec. 26th, 2017
Heard the confusion of exactly what is a Dowager.
My response:
A dowager is not just a widow, but a widow has a noble title and handsome financial arrangement from the late husband that is not very shabby compare to her own born heir of her husband's share. A Dowager is privileged because of her senior age, her noble title and her influence in her late husband's house including her other children's households.
What would happen if a widow is not willing to tolerate a Dowager or an heiress? Well, the same if a gentleman is not willing to tolerate another gentleman, let's say how well resourceful a widow does mean a lot in this kind of situation. It is the same when a Dowager is not getting along with an heiress. It is the same when a Dowager or an heiress does not get along with a gentleman.
What will happen if a wife or a Mistress is not getting along with a Dowager or an heiress? It is understood as the husband or the gentleman lover who is the person that does not get along with the Dowager or the heiress. So it is the same as a Dowager or an heiress does not get along with the husband or the gentleman.
The "not getting along situation" between a Dowager or an heiress, or a gentleman is understood as between the head of different houses.
What is the difference between an heiress with a noble title and an heiress without a noble title? Purely just how resourceful an heiress can be.
----Dec. 26th, 2017
Heard this morning's presentation of the frustration over my biological children.
My response: This is ridiculous that all these "pants-off for money" groups can be supported on the public channel to insult everyone who is never one of them, who is never their business and never intend to fxxx them.
I am never such a cheap a person that needs to have some money through child-bearing that is resulted from pants-off to demand money desire. My children are well-known through pregnancy mothers.
I am the heiress, the well-known Asian owner of the British East India company Financier, who also owns its almost $400 Billion American brother Fund that I call O'Connor's family wealth confusion. I am never the person in need of financial security through pants-off.
Who the fxxx are those prostitutes-borns to say if I am allowed to have a child or children authentic enough as if their pants-off only knowledge can be the authentication power? How many they have fxxx-ed that can make them so knowledgeable about everybody's underwear matter is none of my business, I refuse to fxxx any of them. My matter is none of their business because I refuse to fxxx them no matter how whorely & prostituting experienced they are.
----Dec. 26th, 2017
Heard this morning's noise is the confusion of "get money from pants-off experience" and "get inheritance as the result of parents' mating experience."
My response: "Get money from pants-off experience" is sexual activities between money giver and money recipient that emphasized on providing sexual coitus experience in exchange for getting money provided.
Having inheritance means there is no sexual activity at all between the money giver and money recipient. The money recipient is the mating result of the money giver's parenting efforts.
Who does not know the difference between a child's relationship with birth parents' mating experiences and sexual partners sexual intercourse relationship?
----Dec. 26th, 2017
12-25-2017 Merry Christmas
To the well-known my own biological children:
Merry Christmas!
You are well-known my own biological children the same as well-known "An Asian Owner" in British East India Company Financier's story. Your mother is never the person that needs you to have some financial security. Do not listen to any nonsense if you are good enough to your mother or your father, and tell those who doubt your mother's unlady-like behavior that mother is an heiress from a 2000-years-long polygamist family. That is that.
*The "An Asian Owner" is well-known to entire Britain and entire France for over one or two centuries. A lot of people from India aware of these "An Asian Owner" stories too.
To everyone I owe my big thanks for their love and caring towards my biological children:
Merry Christmas!
To my own father:
Merry Christmas!
I wish with all my heart I can say Merry Christmas to my own birth mother. I hope the rumors about my mother may still alive is true. I am the person providing for both of my biological and lawful parents as decided on July 1st of 2004.
老爸爸：圣诞节快乐。查一下你的每月现金是否有收到。我收到的是$735 加上$30. 你现在的生活是由我负担的， 一切都是依照2004年7月1日我信托财产时所决定的， 着重健康及基本生活保障。支出是由我的信托支付，目前已支付的几个信托都不是方智仁爷爷设的信托，更不是其他人的支出。所以你的生活是由你女儿我负担的。如果妈妈还在，她的待遇和你是一样的。😀😀
还有，如果有人问如果中国有继承税，我继承财产是否欠中国税收，你就说不欠。
我已查询，如果我是一个法国公民（或英国公民）在美国领土上以美国康州居民身份继承财产（英国法国是有继承财产的税收的），我是不用缴纳针对财产征收的遗产税（因为爷爷们都是在1949年10月1日解放以前就已办理境外信托，即将财产信托在中国领土以外地区，爷爷们也都不是法国公民或英国公民或美国公民）， 我也不用缴纳针对我个人的继承税（因为我是在法国或英国境外的美国领土上继承的财产，不用向法国或英国缴纳任何继承说，而美国康州在2004年6月30日这一天孙子女继承祖父母财产是100%免继承税的）。所以，就算中华人民共和国有继承财产相关的税收，我都没欠中华人民共和国任何应交税款。
还有，你所念的南京大学和我所念的上一医都是由爷爷们（方智仁的爷爷，方智仁的父亲和方智仁）捐的。
女儿
----Dec. 25th, 2017
12-24-2017 The difference between A Mistress, A Dowager and An Heiress
Heard this morning's question of "why she can't be a Mistress".
12-23-2017 How the ownership can be "effectively changed" just by announcing an ownership on the radio?
Heard this morning's talk about who owns this radio company and this radio program it investing.
My response: Great to hear Board of Directors take the ownership back from the "announced to own claimer", is this enough to let public aware Board of Directors are the authoritative voice over radio company's management matter including this radio program it investing?
It has been horrible as if this radio company has no management at all just because its ownership was announced by whoever wants to own a radio company has access to this radio company's public channel microphone. How those joking-like announcements of radio company's ownership in June of 2007 could actually become "effective" in radio company's business operation like what had happened?
This entire time it has been my complaints why Albert Gore has the final saying of how radio program should produce about my stories? or if I have achievements, etc. ? Albert Gore got nothing to do with me and he is not the computer person or graduated from a medical school to evaluate if I have any achievements, why him? Oh, now I knew it was all because of that joke in June of 2007 that made him the voice of radio company's business decision, how about me related? How he became the authoritative voice about my anything?
All I heard yesterday about this was there was or were female voices have been used to mimic my voice, and I did write an email to law enforcement because I did not know what has been said to the public audience in my voice. If you have been pissed off about what "I" commented or "I" opinioned through this radio program or some other places, please contact law enforcement if the impact has been immense, or send me an email that was listed right below this blog's title about your complaints. There was an 1800 number that was published on May 16 of 2017, it was paid by the account that managing my $3Billion major featured person fee. I heard because of the disputes of those featured mimic voices deserve to share this $3Billion of major featured person fee between 2005 to Dec. 31st of 2012. (they already deposit this radio company paid-out $3Billion into their own bank accounts and currently in disputes), the phone receiver is uncertain. I refuse to let those unwanted and completely illegal activities to abuse my voice right and to share my major featured person fee.
* My understanding, even if out of the consideration that I do have my handsome inherited wealth that it should be alright to let somebody mimic my voice to make some money through their own mimicking talents, they should announce themselves instead of abuse my voice right. And it won't be entire $3Billion that much.
*如果中国政府有听说我在2007年前后通过广播剧或者其他媒体说中国政府是一个无政府组织，请向美国司法机关查询。我从未发表类似言论，我是从2015年一月开始因私人财产被凭奶子屁股无理强行索求还不给不行，才开始痛骂中国政府根本是个敲诈勒索犯罪团伙外加卖淫集团被取名为中国政府，我今天已经就广播剧使用声音演员以模仿我的声音通过广播剧发表一些言论报警美国联邦调查局。
----Dec. 23rd, 2017
12-22-2017 Strategy of Desperation and Strategy of Buy-Out-Everyone
Heard this morning's proud announcement of victory to own the entire 5 times more.
My response: Heard that is apparently announced as proud of victory win by the strategy of taking of pants in front of the husband's uncle and the husband's uncle's colleague. Is it possibly really broadcasted as such a proud on the public radio?
I thought she has been very proud she married to the money, why this desperation strategy is needed? Why I have a complaint about this? Because the similar demand is rumored about my already pre-paid medical expenses. She just can't bear that medical expense was paid by a check printed as "Company (Investor)". Even with an investor clearly printed next to the company name, that check has to be destroyed, otherwise whatever left that has not been used in there has to be her money.
To destroy a check that was already cashed in October of 2017 or to own the money knowing that was never her husband's or her husband's any relatives' money? What kind of desperation is this? I have tons of similar complaints about this female that I have constantly called this female a psycho, I heard she publicly complained about this PSYCHO title she earned so hard on a lot of public media, so should I call her something else such as "fake rich but real beggar"?
*The check was paid from the company's investor's(Investor Fund) capital accounts (also called owner's account or each shareholder's account). That Investor Fund is my inheritance. Her husband or her husband's relatives' similar checks would be printed as "Company (Firstname Lastname)". My capital accounts that with my name on them are in my trusts.
----Dec. 22nd, 2017
If I am asked why she can be so desperate?
My response: That is never my curiosity.
But I assumed that has something to do with the saying that her husband's father does have a younger child. All these being victoried of "owned already" as well as myself may be the party that had supported the Mr. Senior's wife to have a child through pregnancy mother after almost over 50 years of marriage.
I was talking about me possibly having a pregnancy-unfriendly womb and was having some anxiety health situation, I was in my late 30s and I may need to wait for another 10 years to consider helped nature pregnancy. And when I was talking about being a mother through pregnancy mother with the help of very common medical technology IVF (In-vitro Fertilization), it interested a lot of females who have not been a mother for a lot of reasons. One of them is the Mrs. Senior.
I felt bad for Mrs. Senior not being a mother after almost 50 years marriage. You can say I was easy about that person's inheritable because I inherited my own grandfathers' handsome blessing the day before, that is if I am considered a "fake female in interest". Or you can say I just didn't care the impacts to that person's inheritable at all by just being an outsider. Either way, I just did not think it was inappropriate to say Mrs. Senior can have a child through pregnancy mother in her 70s. I was not set up the Mr. Senior with a 20s to intentionally impact that person's inheritable. It was Mr. Senior's wife after almost 50 years marriage.
The female who I often called a psycho may beyond boundary felt uncomfortable about the impacts of her announced child's inheritable. Regarding this, I announce here I do not care a bit. I won't tolerate her taking my money as if I owe her. I never owe her a bit. I take legal action every time if she tries. I called law enforcement's help regarding my $3Billion radio company's income.
I repeat what I said in the morning, "David Petraeus has made his own announcements loudly and quiet out his harshness through promotions in reality, but he has thrown shits at me even louder and promoted those shits 100 times fold louder in my reality life as well as quite out any efforts of reporting that I have my own very handsome wealth. That is the reason I sue them both for severe sexual harassments."
*When that person's marriage was announced in June of 2007 on the radio program, I was in a health situation that I did not even remember I had met that person. I have no need to demand financial providing from that person or his related because I have been well provided for since Christmas of 2014 and there is no confusion that I never demanded anything before Christmas of 2014.
----Dec. 22nd. 2017
Heard the rumor of the saying that his grandfather can kill my great-grandfather, he can kill me.
My response: By rumored, this is a 3rd or a 4th cousin to me or my great-grandfather and once worked for the couple mentioned above.
By rumor, the confidence came from the same repeated strategy: Buy all the way through. I was like "Oh, no wonder this time this family need The Money to participate, otherwise not enough money to buy everyone".
By rumor, the strategy repeated to be used on my great-grandfather and my grandfather.
My great-grandfather and my great-great-grandfather were known for supported almost entire Chinese College Education system in early 1900 time.
I heard my great-grandfather was an over-night sudden death caused by poisoned food in 1930. And the money my great-grandfather entrusted was claimed owned by a cousin of my great-grandfather's and some of it was donated to both the Chinese National Party and the Chinese Communist Party after his death. It was in 1930 when the Chinese Communist party was in need of money time.
My grandfather passed away by natural death in 1965, the People's Republic of China was just after 3 years of hardship or three years famine time which may be the reason that money could achieve a lot to have the confidence of buy-way-out is a strategy.
----Dec. 22nd, 2017
12-21-2017 A public microphone can only report A Lawful Ownership
Heard this morning's talk about David Petraeus decision on me.
My response: David Petraeus had announced he has nothing to do with me at all on this same radio program and elsewhere.
I repeat what I said in the morning: David Petraeus decision does not represent my decision or my opinion unless authorized.
What I own is never his to decide. Who I am is never his to decide. I am the owner of British East Indian Company Financier Fund by inheriting according to its centuries well-known entrusting "An Asian" person's will. I am the cash provider for Lehman Brother's Subprime Mortgage loans.
My wealth has nothing to do with David Petraeus or his family wealth or his relatives' family wealth. My current financial providing has nothing to do with David Petraeus or his family wealth or his relatives' family wealth.
12-20-2017 British East India Company Financier Fund
I heard there was a media interview broadcasted yesterday that his beloved females declared I do not even have a resume which is certainly an untrue statement. The following link is for anyone who has received education to check out if that expression is out of human reproduction-function-only organ to insult the fact that a human does have a brain for any non-sexual related resume. I am sick of his beloved females' shits out of their sexual activities. They have been one of the major reasons for all these shits threw at me on the radio.
Archive Section of My Web Blog-- My Proud Achievements
----Dec. 21st, 2017
Heard this morning's arguments about who should own this radio program.
My response: I am the creator and major featured person of the radio program, and I am the investor to both radio company and radio program. I own above shares lawfully.
I heard Chinese government's representative had announced on the radio program some "announced ownership of this radio program" is the reason for this morning's arguments. I announce here that those "announced ownership on the radio" has nothing to do with me and has nothing to do with my lawful ownership shares. I did call law enforcement's help on tons of these similar "announced ownership" through producing an entertainment company's microphone that intended to own my lawful wealth.
My lawful shares are represented by radio company IHeartMedia's Board of Directors. My investment in this radio program and IHeartMedia is through an American Fund which is a brother Fund to British East India Company's Financier Fund.
I heard IHeartMedia's Board of Directors has no saying over this radio program producing or anything about IHeartMedia is because it was announced that Albert Gore is "the real biggest announced owner of IHeartMedia" by his (Albert Gore's) own joking tone announcement on the radio program before 2010 time. I heard this same person also announced himself is "the real president of the United States" in the same joking tone earlier this year.
I heard since then anything this Albert Gore decided has been announced as United States government's decision. I did call law enforcement's help on announcement's I accused as "public kill attempted". Those announcements that I heard rumored everywhere are " the United States' government decided the Chinese woman in Boston won't get any appropriate medical treatment", " or "the United States' government decided that law enforcement won't investigate on anything that the Chinese woman in Boston had called possible crimes", as well as some clear instructions on how to remotely harm or kill the Chinese woman in Boston through some technology. I am the "Chinese woman in Boston" that public audience understood.
I am protected by the United States' Government under President Trump's leadership.
I am protected by the United States' Military under President Trump's leadership.
I am protected by the United States' law enforcement that under President Trump's leadership.
*IHeartMedia is the former Clear Channel Media.
*The American Fund mentioned above is the O's family wealth confusion.
----Dec. 21st, 2017
12-20-2017 British East India Company Financier Fund
Heard this morning's broadcasting sworn protection of lawful interests.
My response: I heard the issues are caused by what an immigration country the United States is.
For my own experiences, almost everybody but in very limited numbered countries like Britain, France and India know that the British East India company financier Fund has been historically known entrusted by an Asian.
And tons of similar confused stories of never heard of from worldwide immigrants.
----Dec. 20th, 2017
Heard the question why nobody doubted if it possible I am eligible to be the mother of the British Crown Prince's children.
My response: Maybe everybody had heard from their British friends, or French friends, or Indian friends that the British East India Company Financier Fund would be the reason for the British Crown Prince to consider.
And I was willing because only a British Crown Prince (junior) who also carry my blood can claim this fund to be owned by the British Royals from him on.
I was heartbroken when I heard the British Crown Prince chose not to have such a child which left me tons of greatest opportunities to wear the most pretty possible every time I need to introduce I am the owner of the British East India Company financier fund, as well as the reason that the British Royals feel OK in unison not to own the British East India Company financier fund from the next generation on.
I am OK that there is no such child and there are no such children to remind me that I am unwanted. And I feel relieved that I do not need to struggle if I should make my own heir cry for at least one title I inherited.
----Dec. 20th, 2017
Some updates on CEOs being dragged out stories.
My response: One dragged-out American Fund's CEO has been pissed off since the day, and I heard the reason was he insisted on its parent Fund's CEO to contact his home phone number, and the parent British fund's CEO insisted on him went back to the office to pick up the phone there. The Big question from British was "Why can't he just get up and go back into the building from a rear entrance?"
The mystery that caused some misunderstanding in this dragged-out story was the American Fund's CEO never heard of such treat till experienced it while the British parent fund's CEOs have already well familiar with these treats for a couple of hundred years. The historical stories are if the CEO was butts-on-the-ground threw out, the CEO would just get up and find a door that could re-enter the building, or just moved the entire company to another building if the British Royals ordered the CEO not allowed to come back to the building.
----Dec. 20th, 2017
12-19-2017
Heard this morning's talk about who has not enjoy whom or who did check out tatoo.
My response: All are none of my business.
The only one that may be my business is I need to dress pretty the most was laughed out histerically by the interpretation of "rather be a mother-fucker". I heard those are Chinese females who never heard of British East India Company financier fund's historic stories.
It is none of my business other than to say I heard the reason of the laugh did clarify this morning he never enjoyed the mother image in the laugh.
----Dec. 19th, 2017
My clarification on my participation in radio program producing:
I have not heard any broadcast episodes of this radio program I have been complaining since it on-air in 2005.
I have not yet in studio-participating the producing of this radio program since its pilot time.
I do not know what has been announced on this radio program since 2005 other than some rumors concerning my own lawful interests, and I did call laws' help on a lot of things that concern my lawful interest.
I refuse my own lawful rights to be stepped on in the name of producing this radio program or promoting this radio program.
I refuse my own lawful interests to be stepped on in the name of producing this radio program or promoting this radio program.
I refuse my own financial belonging be given out by announcing gifting on a public media without my own wish.
I did call law enforcement's help to get back every penny I own that has been given out illegally by the radio program's producing team together with its local promotion teams.
I did call my own attorneys to check why and how there have been so many outside saying-over power on my lawful interests that have been created by some producers of this radio program's announce-to-own efforts.
----Dec. 19th, 2017
12-18-2017 Horrifying to know this Announced-to-own scheme has been since 2006 or 2007
Heard this morning's talk about why O'Connors are so supported to announce-to-own.
My response: Exactly.
The Fund caused O'Connors' confusion is the brother Fund to British East India Company's Financier and both owned by a French Fund.
Since Queen Victoria time in 1800, British Royals efforts to own this Fund have made so many British know that Fund was not any O'Connor'ss family wealth, and so many French know that Fund was never any O'Connor's wealth.
The other one of my inheritance Fund that caused a Jessica Pejoves'(Petroves?) severe confusion is similar to this fund, so many British know this was never Pejoves'(Petroves?) family wealth, and so many French know that Fund was never any Pejoves'(Petroves?) wealth.
Heard the big names are either sharing O'Connors' confusion or sharing this Jessica Pejoves' (Petroves?) confusion by marriage, rumored 4 Miss Pejoves (Petroves?) (2 twins from the same Pejoves (Petroves?) mother) and 4 MissO'Connors (from the same mother) married to the big names from the same great grandfather's line (fathered by or mothered by).
Since 2015, Worldwide people knew British Crown Prince chose not to wish to have this British East Indian Company Financier Fund by publicly addressed he never had anything to do with its U.S. citizen Chinese Owner.
There is no such child and no such children that shared between any British Prince with British East India Company's financier fund's U.S. citizen Chinese Owner.
I am truly impressed by the Lawful Country the UK has been since the Queen Victoria time. And I am aware I have to dress the most pretty possible whenever I need to introduce myself as U.S. citizen Chinese owner of the British East India Company Financier.
----Dec. 18th, 2017
I was asked why I have to make it so public like this?
My response: Not my preference. I have no choice but to make this whole story public.
Since 2015, so many people have verified this Fund is the brother Fund to British East India Company's Financier Fund. And today, some O'Connors still insist on to claim on the public channel radio to own this Fund, and they took every penny of the money I was lawfully provided by this fund for my exclusive usage to cover my daily living. I have been shitted a beggar and have been living in poverty because of this radio program's promotions. I have no choice but to make this whole story public.
It was constantly announced on the radio that O'Connors deserve to own this Fund, and some O'Connors insist on making phone calls to the Fund to demand money per their request just to prove O'Connors truly own this Fund, and insist on to at least to own over 100 Billion of this Fund, by rumor, because this is a over $300 Billion Fund and I published $200 Billion on my web blog. They claim this has to be owned by them because they announced it on the radio already.
I refuse to let my lawfully owned inheritance Fund to be illegally announced-to-owned just by some public channel radio program's announcement.
What they cannot own if they can own this Fund just by holding on to a public channel microphone?
As far as I heard of, rumored Albert Gore announced himself to be the biggest investor of this radio company before 2010 which caused Board of Director has no saying over who should be the CEO.
Heard rumored currently, Board of Directors support current CEO but public denounced the same CEO on the radio by saying he has been ousted about 2-3 months ago. And I heard he is still the CEO currently.
SInce 2007, rumored Albert Gore announced the first time that one of intellectual income to be called his own money to give out or to keep as he wishes and every penny of all my intellectual income since then. All these money has been transferred to announced patron's bank account as announced on the radio. I called law enforcement help on this. I accused Albert Gore committed public robbery or public theft.
Beyond my money, I knew I have to address that my Ingonyama title that I lawfully inherited from another birth grandfather of mine cannot be owned by just announced want-to-own on the radio. And I refuse to let anyone own my own titles including this Ingonyama title.
Beyond my money and my titles, I heard some other private employment promotion(s), public post(s), etc. have been announced, and I am not certain if those were announcements only or announced to be promoted etc.
Beyond my money and my titles, my own achievements have all been denied to be mine because some people do not know why those have to be my achievements, even though by hard evidence those are my achievements. And almost all my achievements have been announced-to-own on this radio program by whoever desire to have some achievements.
I did call laws' help on my own matters that I am certain of.
----Dec. 18th, 2017
12-17-2017 Why my exclusive usage lawful cash providing can be "disagreed" by whoever?
Heard this morning's talk about my cash providing.
My response: I feel I can finally breathe now. Thanks very much.
It will be my exclusive providing, no split. I heard 2 confusing number of the cash amount that was broadcast this morning so I will let my attorneys know what is the number when I receive.
I also hear complaints of "too much" for the big number, I say that are ridiculous complaints. That is the amount I am lawfully provided for my exclusive usage and that's that. It is none of anyone else's business how much I should use or can use. These complaints are from those who want money just by being money-wanters. I refuse to provide for them. Who the Fxxx they think they are. It was never their money for them to have such complaints.
My inherited wealth is either my trusts set up by my own birth grandfathers or my own birth grandfather's wealth I inherited. It was never a shared family wealth. My trusts are owned by me ever since the day those trusts were set up for me. My own birth grandfather's wealth (方智仁）was owned by my own birth grandfather(方智仁) before my inheriting, and was never owned by anyone else after my birth grandfather's own inheriting in 1930 or so. I inherited my own birth grandfather's（方智仁）wealth according to my own birth grandfather's will in 2004.
----Dec. 17th, 2017
Heard this morning's confusing number was supported by big names.
My response: That has been my anger the entire time. My inherited wealth has nothing to do with their names no matter how huge their names are. Why they can have this illusion I will let them have this saying power over my money? They are the ones telling everybody I have nothing to do with them, why they have this illusion that they can have this saying power over my money just by having nothing to do with me? I know a lot of people already said they want to let me have some of their own money by creating opportunities for me to file lawsuits against them. I just do not understand since they knew I never demanded a penny of their money, why would they willing to let me have some so voluntarily? The experience is the big names seemed just won't stop till see you in courts.
I am not complaining that the radio program does some reporting to reflect some issues, but reporting should never mean saying over power, right?
Like the other day, New Jersey Senator O'Connor stated on the radio program, I heard, that my inheritance fund (the O'Connors confused one) is not their family wealth. Well, some big names insist on to broadcast a People's Republic of China's citizen's announcement "but that fund is" immediately after it. Which Fund? Why this American Fund's lawful ownership is a People's Republic of China's citizen's to "correct"? This almost 400 years old American fund that causes O'Connors' confusion was confused by a 200-years-ago's letter, and this entire time that Fund has a British parent Fund, and a French grandparent Fund, and another great grandparent Fund that registered in a country has no records of any O'Connor ancestors. Why some big names, by rumors, insist on to let a People's Republic of China's citizen have this opportunity to make everyone doubts who should own the money, what is the purpose?
I have to express myself that I do not know if the rumors can be true, and I am not willing to participate any efforts to send big names to courts for financial gain, but I will sue big names if my own lawful interests and my own lawful rights have been impacted by their rumored efforts.
12-10-2017 My Capital accounts are in my Trusts, not in the State of Massachusetts
12-12-2017 Heard this morning's confusion from P. R. China how that is my Fund.
----Dec. 17th, 2017
Heard some big names still confused if I spend their money by saying I want this or that publicly in front of them.
My response: How could I possibly spend their money just by saying publicly that I want this or that when they were presented at the same meeting? At least one of their own (David Petraeus) never felt humiliated when yelling "Not going to pay" publicly when they were presented as well as everybody else in the same meeting whenever I said I want this or that.
And there were people answered publicly in front of them that they would cover my spending whenever I said I want this or that every time cause David Petraeus' angry yelling "Not going to pay". One of those who claimed to cover my spending is the person I have called my own accountant.
Why would any of other big names feel any humiliation to say "not going to pay" when they were approached privately after the meeting?
12-16-2017 I refuse what I own to be announced given out and I refuse to be harassed by none of my business rumors
----Dec. 17th, 2017
12-16-2017 I refuse what I own to be announced given out and I refuse to be harassed by none of my business rumors
Heard this morning's talk about Lehman Brothers' investment.
My response: I refuse to give anything related to Lehman Brothers' investment to anyone, as a gift or not as a gift at all.
Heard this morning confirmed that I have spent total $45 Billion in cash from my allowances to help Lehman Brothers' cash reserves. I wish Mr. R-s and Mrs. R-s could know this is the reason they had been approached to ask if they would be willing to financially support those "what I said" on July 1st of 2004.
I wish Mr. R-s and Mrs. R-s could understand I never intended to spend their money and I never spent their money is a true statement.
----Dec. 16th, 2017
Heard some scary rumors about Dwarfs and Inmans.
My response: I am a resident of Boston, Massachusetts. Dwarf and Inman are just two geographic locations in Boston, MA.
Inman Square is located near Central Square, I heard it has a lot of law school students' residents near-by.
The dwarf is located near Boston Aquarium area, I do not know who Dwarfs possibly are.
----Dec. 16th, 2017
Heard rumors about I am being a bad luck to a wedding because I am known for no-wedding.
My response: Heard it is so severe that I should not even be allowed to be near to any place that having a wedding going on. This is through some malicious harassment promotions.
The truth is I only have children from marriage, as I decided on July 1st of 2004.
I was never a person in need of a child or children for financial providing or titles & privileges reasons. I was never that cheap could have my children to be called illegitimate children.
----Dec. 16th, 2017
Heard this morning's broadcasting of a Chinese who is or isn't a real one.
My response: Either case is none of my business.
If any Chinese could remember there was a published article in Chinese magazine World Journals Weekends about the war in Afghanistan and about deployed U.S. military there. That article was published before 2010, and I remembered it mentioned a newly wedded wife of the most senior U.S. Military commander in Afghanistan.
If anyone insists on saying I am a stuck-on to that commander, I have to call that person a psycho because that is just ridiculous while knowing I had been in no contact with that commander for any reason at all since July of 2004. I did call the person who has minded it very much beyond boundary a psycho and I did call laws' help on possible severe sexual harassment case through this radio program and through the promotions of this radio program.
----Dec. 16th, 2017
Heard this morning's talk about I said I would give David Petraeus money.
My response: It was on July 1st of 2004. That conversation was about how I would share my wealth with my possible biological children. David Petraeus made it very clear he has his own excellent family wealth and his child would not need any of my money, that was even if he shares a child with me. Later he asked me if I would be willing to give his child who also carry my blood some of my own money if he changes his mind about this, I said of course. And he asked me to promise that I won't change my mind about this. And I did promise it.
He did change his mind about this totally by having his biological child with another person as he already publicly announced. And I did not change my mind a bit about how I only willing to give my own money to my own biological children.
I won't give any of my own money to any of David Petraeus' associated romance or non-romance relationships. I refuse to give a penny to any of his real or rumored romances, in the past, at present, or in the future.
David Petraeus publicly announced he has nothing to do with me.
I announce here that any of his romance, rumors or real ones, is none of my business.
The end.
----Dec. 16th, 2017
12-15-2017
Heard this morning's broadcasting about un-controllable chuckles.
My response: I heard the feeling felt was cold at the moment.
I heard in most of the cases that chuckle was a response to the question "Why that Chinese woman's words mean anything at all?" I am truly sorry for all the hurts that caused by cold feeling felt, but they were never the group who liked to see me have financial losses that may further impact on so many people's life. CDC related subprime loans were the real reason.
----Dec. 15th, 2017
Heard this morning's broadcasting about a Chinese female who was a former producer of this radio program in 2016 time.
My response: She was the person, by rumor, insisted on to broadcast my stories as she preferred. She was the person called a Chinese male Germany resident who has the exact same Chinese name as mine to state Min Fang has nothing to do with 2008 Beijing Olympic Games Opening Ceremony to confuse public audience who I am.
By rumors, she was the major person in Chinese producing team in 2016 time that insisted on producing radio program in such a way to confuse the public if I have any non-sexual professional or academic achievements. I did call law enforcement's help on Chinese producing team's efforts in 2016,
Rumored, she is a relative by DNA to a Chinese female diplomat who has demanded financial providing for her own biological child from me. I refuse if rumors about demanding are true.
----Dec. 15th, 2017
Heard there is some confusion about the Fund that causes O'Connors' confusion.
My response: The confusion I heard was why now if it was not appropriate since Senators became paid public posts.
That fund was set up by a trust that my ancient grandfather set up for me. It has a British parent fund, a French grandparent Fund, and a great-grandparent Fund that has been registered in a country that has no known records of O'Connor family's ancestry.
As currently well known, O'Connors' family has been agreed of providing for over six generations that most of them do have huge confusion about this fund's ownership. The confusion was the same when Senators became paid public posts.
It won't be easy to explain to them from entrusting groups as well as from everybody else including those who may not understand why they could be confused, and these explaining efforts may be interpreted as attacks from ill-wishers. I was born in 1967 and this stopping process started after I inherited on June 30th of 2004. It has been lengthy because the confusion has been real and because it is not everybody clear about the details of this agreed-upon providing.
One of the evidence that the confusion has been real was how so annoying my inheriting was to O'Connors' on June 30th of 2004.
The evidence of possible misinterpreting can certainly be seen from how I complained about Tina O'Connor.
----Dec. 15th, 2017
12-14-2017 I am not an "egging" victim and I may need to continue my "no cash song"
Heard this morning's broadcasting about three possible Charles Schnieberg.
My response: None of them has anything to do with me in the past.
One is over 60 years old, one has a twin(elder children) only 6 years old, the third one is public wedding married in 2007.
My children were born in 2010 when I was a "homeless" over a year already. I am not the person having the sexuality and was "not in good shape ( a homeless already)" in 2009. My children were born through pregnancy mothers in 2010.
My biological children are not from any of that three people who were featured in this morning's broadcasting. Being their mother, I am also providing for my biological children as well as my biological lawful parents as what I decided on July 1st of 2004.
----Dec. 14th, 2017
Heard this morning's broadcasting talk about my housing and my food stamps.
My response: I heard it was broadcasted the other day that Tina O'Connor took her father's money via taking my providing of my housing and my food stamps, etc.. She took that money from my second year's providing which was provided by my inheritance fund that causes O'Connor family confusion, every penny of my second year's providing.
This morning's broadcasting was about I may still need to continue my "not enough cash" song, but my apartment and my food stamps have already been paid-in-full for years already from the first year's providing.
I have been provided by a different inheritance fund each year for four years now. I am hoping that my other two years' providing (both already paid in full) can increase my cash providing instead of being routed out like Tina O'Connor's story.
I do not remember if my cash ($300/month) would be in yearly providing, or if there are some other arrangements. There were some talks about welfare providing if I would still be anxious enough, but that was about social security disability. I am certain I won't be qualified, thanks to my great psychologist. This is the reason I have not complain about no cash from social security yet.
----Dec. 14th, 2017
Heard this morning's talk about seeding program.
My response: I also heard some rumors about some egging program. I am certain I am not a victim if there is such a psycho scheme.
THere were tons of rumors about my romance. I am the heir from a long history polygamist family may contribute to my easiness when more than one husband matrimony was discussed. But I am not the person in need of a marriage or children for financial providing and tons of decent people do(did) not like any wife to get hurt by some nonsense rumors, especially those who already mothers her husband's child or children.
I do not have any child or children from those who are already being a father in 2004 and those who moved on after the meeting in 2004. I only met few of them before 2004.
----Dec. 14th, 2017
12-13-2017 Invention was Never Easy -- About Smartphones and Wipes
Heard this morning's broadcasting about the discussion of how to make cleaning wipes.
My response: I heard what broadcasted this morning was the replay of the original discussion on July 1st of 2004. I am the living testimony of body wipes "one application can clean as a good shower".
I tried out when I was a "homeless" at Boston Logan Airport. It was one application full body clean resulted like had a good shower, as discussed.
I pass along the information that I heard some mothers want this good-shower-clean for baby wipes.
----Dec.13th, 2017
Heard the reason that Smartphone Discussion on June 30th of 2004 has more issues about "my lack of confidence in Chinese".
My response: I heard the issue is why I did not believe that Chinese could do smartphones without any known invention of a computer operating system.
This was the "discrimination vs intellectual property" argument happened on June 30th of 2004. The Taiwanese female was pissed off because I refused to privilege Chinese to be the first to invent smartphones. And I was pissed off when she took off saying that she got all the necessary information to spin all in-discussion group out. I came from the People's Republic of China and I was very sensitive to this once very popular "1980 trading style of the People's Republic of China".
It was not that I refused to privilege Chinese or I was discriminating Chinese intelligence. It was out of the consideration that there were known existing operating system's inventors in the discussion group, and the discussion was all about the possible technique concerns of "converting" their existing laptop or desktop operating system source codes to use not-sable-yet newly invented mini hardware to make a cellphone a smart one that is equivalent to a laptop computer without a keyboard and a mouse. How could anyone who never had operating system invention experience can finish this project as fast as possible?
The argument started after we almost finished the entire discussion. Taiwanese group was not the discussion contribution group, they participated by listening to our discussion. I was pissed off seriously when she stated she got all the necessary information and her company did not need us at all. We were the discussion contributed group, I was the annoying talker always cut-in with the correct answers before the other three people whenever there was a concern need to be addressed, I was not intentionally to be so annoying and I contributed a lot. It was our intellectual contribution that has huge financial values, it was never that Taiwanese' to claim or to take away like that. *Heard the other three people were Mr. Bill Gates (DOS), Mr. Paul Allen (Window) and late Mr. Steve Jobs (Mac).
About the "discrimination anger", how could it possibly reasonable to expect those who could do the job wait for the Chinese to learn how to do it? or if the expectation was those who could do the job should sacrifice their own business opportunities but teach Chinese how to do it? Why or how or who could be so privileged to have this kind of expectation?
That Taiwanese owns an electronics technology company but she was not a computer programmer. I understood she did not understand that I was not the reason if Chinese can invent a computer operating system or not, and I will never be the reason. Why? No Chinese need my approval to sit in front a computer or a desk to write up some operating source codes that can make any computer that is assembled from every single piece of hardware to operate with.
I heard some Chinese from the People's Republic of China were also pissed off because of similar reasons. And plus why I discriminate Chinese while knowing Bill Gates who invented DOS was not even college graduated, and Steve Jobs invented Mac only in one year time after his college graduation.
I can only answer these kinds of accusations with "I do not know why no Chinese has invented any computer operating system yet. I really do not know."
Now I am wondering why People's Republic of China's government kept saying I am so fake because it is impossible that I could have any achievement in Computer Science because I worked full time in a restaurant for my 2 years graduate study on Computer Science and worked for Janus Associates on the Biogate project for only 4 and half years.
Exactly, what is the issue?
----Dec. 13th, 2017
12-12-2017 Heard about three classic pieces of "Perform to spend money or Fake to make Intellectual Income"(听说了三段经典"表演就可以花别人的钱及假装就可以挣到智慧产权")
Heard this morning's broadcasting caused confusion of if it is a quoted salary.(中文附后）
My response: It is not a quoted salary.
It is confusing because of the editing results of broadcasting an immediate appended next line that was said by a People's Republic of China's citizen. I heard this was helped by the Jessica who is the announced mother of a Mr. R's child(ren).
Normally, an investor only willing to take out limited amount each year from the investment in order to keep investment going for the next year. This is the reason it is a quoted "salary" in-jokes.
Agreed-upon providing need to be agreed by the representative of an investment because it is from a special reason spending for the investment's owner's capital account that needs to be agreed by the owner or by the owner's representative.
It was broadcasted this morning that O'Connors families agreed-upon providing has been agreed by this Fund's parent investor Fund, but it is in process of stopping.
----Dec. 12th, 2017
Heard this morning's confusion from P. R. China how that is my Fund.
My response: It was by my ancient grandfather's own specification. Let me explain.
My ancient grandfather (my grandfather A), the person who set up the trust, specified in his letter (will) that the daughter born with family heir birthmark from his which son's(my grandfather B's) heir birthmark line would be the sole beneficiary person of this trust. The specified son in the will letter (my grandfather B) is the son having family heir birthmark.
My grandfather B, the heir-son of this grandfather A that was specified in this grandfather A's letter(will), did not have a girl but a boy(my grandfather C) born with a family heir birthmark. So, my grandfather B informed those who have been taking care of the trust that his heir birthmark boy(grandfather C) would be the line that this heir-birthmark beneficiary girl would be born from.
And so on for my grandfathers till my grandfather Fang, Zhiren's(方智仁) generation. My father Fang, Wenhai(方文海) is my grandfather's (方智仁) heir birthmark boy. My grandfather Fang, Zhiren(方智仁) informed those who have been taking care of the trust that the beneficiary heir birthmark girl would be from his heir birthmark son Fang, Wenhai(方文海).
I was born in 1967 with the same family birthmark palms almost identical to my father's(方文海) birthmark palms.
This is how I say I inherited this trust that was set up by my ancient grandfather(my grandfather A) according to my ancient grandfather's(grandfather A's) will. That Fund was set up by the trust I inherited is the reason that is my Fund.
It was broadcasted this morning that this trust was set up for Fang, Zhiren's granddaughter(方智仁的孙女）who is from Fang, Wenhai, the eldest son of Fang, Zhiren(即方智仁的长子方文海所出的女儿）.
----Dec. 12th, 2017
Heard the People's Republic of China's relentless efforts of performing art to spent whoever's money presentation was inspired by performing art teaching materials imported from the U.S.
My response: I heard about these 2-3 "classic pieces of my performing skills" from 2004's meetings' records. I informed law enforcement's about this over a year ago.
The "classic" piece was "how I performed to spent famous R's family wealth" no matter how I was objected strongly every time I was expressing how to spend some money. It was a classic piece how I was not a bit flinched or concerned if I would get caught in any trouble.
Why would I flinch or concerned? I was spending my own money I inherited from my own birth Chinese grandfather who was definitely not any Mr. R. I was happy everytime I was objected because I thought I was congratulated that I have my own handsome money to spend.
I never even contacted R's anybody after July 1st of 2004's meeting, how could I possibly spend R's family wealth by just saying it in my green card application representing attorney's office in Stamford, Connecticut?
----Dec. 12th, 2017
Heard why the People's Republic of China's government insist on I am a fake was also related to this performing art teaching materials.
My response: That is possibly some Chinese firmly believe that perform can claim Intellectual Incomes even those are even not performing art related.
That was another "classic" piece of June 30th, 2004 presents how I could fake some computer comments regarding smartphones without a flinch that fooled those top-notch computer professionals like Steve Jobs, Bill Gates and Paul Ellen.
Why would I flinch? I had been a computer operating system programmer. That three people had written operating systems' source codes. I had worked on operating system source codes that related to computer security component. I wrote a software piece that can login to any window’s computer without a password. Of course, I know operating system on source codes level very well. I am the top notch computer security professional, at least that's who I was in 2004. Why would I need to perform or fake my comments on what might be the issues of writing a new operating system's source codes?
Those comments I made about computer operating system would be like a medical school graduate's comments on a baby wipes' formula. Why would any medical school graduate need to fake any comment what possible ingredients that can be used in a baby wipe? It is correct that a pharmacist is the person that can produce a formula, but I am a pharmacologist who is profession-ed between a pharmacist and a medical doctor. Of course, I know some formula basics more than a medical doctor. why I need to fake or perform?
I do not know what is the third "classic performing piece" yet.
----Dec. 12th, 2017
听说了今天早上的广播所造成的那是不是打了个引号的工资的疑惑。
我的回应：那不是什么打了个引号的工资。
造成这个疑惑的原因是因为制作编辑的时候在原话后面添加上了一句由中华人民共和国的一个公民所说的一句话。我听说这份制作编辑的努力是由那个R先生已经宣布的孩子妈做的。
一般来说，一个投资人业主为了永续投资，都是每年只从投资实体里拿一部分的钱出来提供家用和零花。这也是为什么会开玩笑说那就是从投资实体领的“工资而已”。
“同意供给”需要由一个投资实体的投资人业主代表的同意才可以就是因为这是一个特殊原因的支出，不是投资实体的经营性支出， 所以需要投资人业主代表的签字从投资实体的投资人业主账户里支出，
今天早上的播出播出的是O'Connor家里的“同意供给”一直都是由该基金的上级投资公司同意的，现在已在逐步停止过程当中。
----2017年12月12日。
听说了今天早上的广播谈到来自中华人民共和国的困扰说为什么那是我的基金。
我的回应：那是根据我自己祖爷爷的界定。让我来解释一下。
我的祖爷爷（我爷爷A），也就是设立这个信托的那个人在他的信里（遗嘱里）界定了一个由他自己的哪个儿子（我爷爷B）所出的家族继承胎记一支的一个有着家族继承胎记的女儿是这个信托的唯一受益人。遗嘱信中所界定的那个儿子（我爷爷B）是一个有家族继承胎记的儿子。
我爷爷B，也就是我爷爷A在他自己所立遗嘱里所界定的继承人儿子，没有生出一个有继承胎记的女儿而是生了一个有继承胎记的儿子（我爷爷C）。所以，我爷爷B就通知了那些照看着这个信托的人，这个信托的继承胎记女受益人将是由他这个有继承胎记的儿子（我爷爷C）这支所出的。
就这样一代又一代，直到我爷爷方智仁这一代。我的父亲方文海是我爷爷方智仁所出的有继承胎记的儿子。所以我爷爷方智仁就通知了那些照看着这个信托的人，这个信托的继承胎记女受益人将是由他这个有继承胎记的儿子方文海这支所出的。
我是1967年出生，我的家族胎记掌纹和我父亲方文海的胎记掌纹几乎是一摸一样的。
这是为什么我说我是按照我祖爷爷（我爷爷A）的遗嘱继承了我祖爷爷（我爷爷A）所设立的这个信托。那个基金是由我所继承的这个信托所设立的，所以我说那是我的基金。
今天早上的播出的是”信托是为方智仁的孙女即方智仁的长子方文海所出的女儿方敏所设立的。“
----2017年12月12日。
听说了中华人民共和国这份用表演艺术来花别人钱的不懈努力是受到了从美国进口的表演艺术教材的启发。
我的回应：我是听说了有这么两三段从2004年的会议记录里截取的所谓”我的表演才华的经典片段“。我大概在一年多以前就已经通知了美国警方。
这一段“经典”是关于我如何花了赫赫有名的R家族的钱财，完全不管我是如何一次次被别人试图强力阻止，就只是一直表达我就是要花这些钱。这是一个经典片段呈现了我是如何一点都不打楞, 还一点都不担心自己惹上麻烦，我就这么成功的当众把别人的钱给花了。
我打愣干嘛，担心干嘛？我是在花我自己所继承的我自己亲生爷爷的钱，我花的是我所继承的我自己方家的华人爷爷的钱，我所有的爷爷就从来没姓过什么R。每一次“别人的强力阻止”都让我很开心，就因为我以为这个别人是在祝贺我有我自己的大把钱可以花。
我在2004年7月1日会议之后就没和R家的任何人联系过，我哪有可能在康州斯坦福我自己绿卡申请律师的办公室里说说话就把R家族的钱给花了？
----2017年12月12日。
听说了中华人民共和国政府坚持说我是假的也和这个表演教材有关。
我的回应：这可能造成了一些华人坚定的认为表演表演就可以拿到和表演艺术完全无关的智慧产权。
这另一个“经典片段”是2004年6月30日那天的。呈现的是有关我如何可以眼睛眨都不眨一下的装腔作势谈论一些有关智慧手机的话题，还把顶级的电脑专家史蒂夫·杰布斯，比尔·盖茨，鲍尔·艾伦都给糊弄闹懵了。
我眼睛眨巴干嘛呀？我是电脑运作系统程式的程序员。那三个人是写过电脑运作系统程式的原始码的，我是做电脑运作系统程式里的保安系统程式的原始码的。我写的程式是可以不用任何密码缓存(no cached password) 就可以登录视窗系统的。我当然很熟悉电脑运作系统程式的程序码。我在2004年是顶级的电脑保安专家。当我谈论写一个新的电脑运作系统的程序可能会碰到那些问题的时候，我为什么需要表演或是装模做样的来谈论？
我对写一个新的电脑运作系统程式的评论，就像一个医学院校的毕业生会对婴儿擦巾应该有些什么成分会做的谈论一样的。为什么一个医学院校的毕业生需要在谈论婴儿擦巾的可能成分配方时装模做样？确实，一个药剂师才有可能会是这个成分配方的产生着，但我是介于医学和药学之间的药理专业毕业的，当然在配方合成上会比医学系毕业的要懂得多一些了。我装腔作势表演什么呀？
我还不清楚那第三段“表演经典”是什么。
----2017年12月12日。
12-11-2017 You are not the person can spend my money
Heard this morning's broadcasting of "whose else has been announced to own?"
12-10-2017 Why I have no money in State of Massachusetts of the United States
Heard this morning's broadcasting about why I have no money in Massachusetts.
My response: Investor tax is a federal tax only that paid when money is taken out from investing, which normally is when money is transferred out of the investing accounts. For my case, it is when money is paying for my exclusive usage (spending) from my trusts. My medical treatment expense associated investor tax, by rumor, has paid in someone else's name, not a pseudo name, to let this or that person have some tax refund and "privileges" to fight for who owns the Fund that paid this tax. I called laws help on this matter.
Intellectual Income has both Federal and MA taxes. For my case, I called laws help since every penny of my intellectual making, by rumor, has been announced on the radio program to be owned by someone else and transferred into that person's bank account through radio program's promotion. I called laws help on this matter.
My investments in Massachusetts are business entities that pay Business related taxes. And those businesses do not have my private capital accounts because those are my trusts' investment's investment's investment, etc. My capital accounts are in my trusts. I am provided for by a local American Fund when the local business representative is authorized to deduct those spending from its parent Fund's capital accounts. That is the reason I changed my inquiries to check if there is any money paid to Boston Housing Authority or Boston Transition Department according to what was decided on July 1st of 2004, and if those paid to Boston Housing Authority or Boston Transition Department are lawfully paid for my exclusive usage.
----Dec. 10th, 2017
Heard this morning's broadcasting of why can't a female have a saying over my money just by the privilege who father her child(ren).
My response: I refuse to let any female to have any saying over my any money just by the fact I am a female who has no chance to seed a female or father a female's child(ren).
I refuse to let any female to have any saying over my any money just by the fact I am a wealthy woman who does not desire any male who is already an OLD MAN to father another female's child(ren).
I swear I am not biological associated with the person who fathers this female's child(ren) no matter how authentic this female's child(ren)'s blood truly reflect her child(ren)'s father's side blood origin.
I swear my wealth's origin is not associated with the person who fathers this female's child(ren) no matter how authentic her child(ren)'s blood truly deserve the child(ren)'s father's side blood originated wealth.
I swear I never sexually enjoyed any female since the day I was born in the People's Republic of China.
I swear I do not know why those P. R. China's female citizens insist on to demand this or that from me as if I desire them sexually and desperately.
I swear I never sexually enjoyed any female since the day I became a female resident of Massachusetts of the United States.
I swear I will never sexually enjoy any female no matter how long I will stay as a female resident of Massachusetts of the United States.
* Massachusetts of the United States is the first State that has the lawful same-gender marriage.
*Old man is how a child refers the biological father in U.S. English.
----Dec. 10th, 2017
Heard the "authentic true blood" is based on the year when a child was born.
My elaborate:
The 1940s was World War II time. Anyone could be the blood giver to a wife's child if the husband was fighting for the freedom, even if that was "helping the fighting on the United States soil".
The 1960s was Hippies time. Everybody supposed to be the blood giver of everybody's child.
The 1970s was Marching for the Vietnam War time. Everybody cared about possible lives losses possibly was a blood giver of another caring person's child.
1980 was Dancing Queen time. Every girl was a dancing queen and every boy certainly would be willing to be a blood giver of a "dancing queen's child".
I have not heard about how authentic a child's blood could be for 1950s borns and for after 1990s borns.
----Dec. 10th, 2017
12-09-2017 Discrimination complaint about my horrible experiences in Boston, MA
Heard this morning's rumored broadcasting about my complaint discrimination of being sexually inactive.
My response: Let me tell you my horrible experiences in Boston, MA, other than those shits you already heard on the radio.
In early 2015, I heard the rumors that my three inheriting meetings in 2004 never happened, and my intellectual contributions did not deserve to be protected by U.S. labor laws and intellectual laws.
It was rumored that I was a beggar who intentionally put myself into this shabby situation in order to get David Petraeus' family wealth. And I was the person never wanted by any prominent male.
Nobody needs to hear my stories at all because radio company already announced on their public channel and through their local station's (magic 106.7FM) promotions to tell everyone I do not deserve anything at all.
It was after over 10 years that
I have no contact with this person,
I have no sexual activities with this person,
I have been not sexually attractive because of my financial and health situation.
Who needs to have this psycho saying that I intentionally being a beggar trying to have David Petraeus' family wealth just by being sexually unattractive to him and no contact with him at all?
I did file the discrimination complaint about my inquiries of my 2004-entrusting-meeting-decided financial providing have been completely ignored just because "It is impossible that I can have any money of my own because I was never wanted by any prominent male." or "It is impossible because I came from the People's Republic of China." I was treated like a beggar because the local radio station magic 106.7FM's manager, by rumors, has been telling everyone in Boston that she knows what is real.
It has been horrible and I have constantly called laws help on this.
----Dec 9th, 2017
Heard it was because the rumored "promise if waiting".
My response: I heard this on July 1st of 2004. I have willingly appreciated it but I was not excited about its financial-related implication. Let me explain why.
I kept saying I inherited handsome trusts that my own birth Chinese grandfathers' setup for me according to my grandfathers' wills. What that means? I have the money that is my money, not my future money. I can spend my money as I wish just like how his father can spend his father's money as his father wishes.
His father's wealth is called his inheritable which will be his wealth someday. And I already have my wealth that I already inherited the day before(June 30th, 2004). When he said he was going to let me have everything he owns, it means to my ears that everything he owns would be his saved salaries from the Military. I do appreciate his promise willingly but I was not impressed about the financial values it implied.
It was similar earlier that same day when he said he would not spend a penny on me. Every time when I was saying how I wanted this or that, he would echo like saying he would not pay for it. And I would start laughing happily every time he said so because I understood it that he was congratulating me that I have my own handsome money that is no comparison much more than his own allowance from his father.
This is the kind of jokes everybody who has inheritable understands. All my grandfathers passed away before I was born. I did not know he was not aware that I did inherit my own birth grandfathers' blessing the day before.
----Dec. 9th, 2017
Heard this morning's broadcasting featured R Foundation.
My response: I heard R Foundation has been organizing this since October of 2015. It started with an on-stage show that presenting the challenge theme of "Who the Fxxx do you think you are".
I do not know who hates me like such and why.
I did visit R center in New York City a couple of times in February and March of 2015 when I was trying to find information about what I had inherited. I did not go in to see anyone but I lingered around for less than half an hour each time. I did not dress up and I was apparently tired each time.
----Dec. 9th, 2017
12-08-2017 My Intellectual Income is Hard Earned
Heard thing morning's broadcasting of a female Chinese voice that seems to be co-operative to my counterparty.
My response: She was not my attorney. Heard she represents the party that has well-known interest conflicts with me. Heard this morning's episode was her first time ever on this radio program and her husband is not a Chinese.
Heard she is the reason that this morning's episode has the public impression if I have any intellectual contribution and why I need to be acknowledged as if I have.
If above are true, she is not the person can participate this public channel radio program producing for her client without letting the public know who her client is. Being a licensed attorney, she is the person knows this is a crime in the United States.
I have complained tons of this radio program's producing efforts like this.
----Dec. 8th, 2017
Heard this morning's broadcasting about Viagra (blue).
My response: About Viagra, I have published as one of my proud. I will continue to publish explanations about my proud achievements.
It was recorded on the same June Sunday in 2004 when I created ideas of 2008 Beijing Olympic Game Opening Ceremony and my understanding of Origin of Chinese Communism Party.
My side story was recorded by my own security cameras and, possibly, law enforcement's cameras.
I reported suspicious activities regarding the software I was working on in January of 2004. The software was the window's login replacement that can login to any window's computer without a password, its client module was what I did. The suspicious activities I reported were this software's original source codes were open to anyone to learn some programming.
The software is bio-authentication login replacement to log into any window's computer without a cached password. My achievement was my client module(component) of this software only need a valid username to grant this user the correctly privileged full access to the computer. I published the explanation of this together with CDSA-ed Secure Transport module (component) as another one of my proud. I am the first person in this entire world that achieved it in both cases.
CDSA-ed Secure Transport was a component I achieved that used CDSA like the Great Wall to protect this secure transport module (component) while using encryptions to protect data. But honestly, how this CDSA wrapped that module, I have no idea. I only knew if I did not do what I did, it just wouldn't work. It was never simple like just wrapping a CDSA_XX_FunctionName around a function. That wrap is to make it pluggable. How this Common Data Security Architecture is framed, I am being honest to say I did not know. I knew this Secure Trasport Module I did was framed somehow.**CDSA is Common Data Security Architecture. It is an Architecture, not an interface.
On that June Sunday in 2004, I was having all these new perspectives about almost everything that I had read or thought of, I couldn't stop solo-speaking a lot of what I had figured out on that day for over an hour. That day, I was visiting a college dormmate lived around Edison area.
----Dec. 8th, 2017
Heard about confusion how intellectual contribution can be appropriately acknowledged and rewarded.
My response: I use a very publicly familiar group of people, movie producing team, to illustrate this.
I have this great idea this "bla bla" can be a great movie;
A literature person agreed and write a script from my "bla bla" story.
A person who knows how to make a movie agreed and called in a group to make a movie.
This group of people includes a movie director, actresses and actors and supporting staff.
My "bla bla" story thus turned into a very popular movie.
I am so proud I am the creator of this movie that attracted so many people.
The literature person is so proud of being the scriptwriter that wrote so many great lines.
The producer is so proud this is a popular movie.
The group of people is so proud of the directing, or the roles they played, or the settings/costumes designed, etc.
Who contributed what, or how well contributed, or what is the appropriate reward is all very clear to all of us that participated this turns "bla bla" into a popular movie.
It is the same in manufacturing industries or service-providing industries.
----Dec. 8th, 2017
11-27-2017 All About Viagra(Blue) and Why is my contribution
Computer Technology and CDSA
Ph.D. in Computer Science & Reforming QA in JP Morgan Chase
About 2008 Beijing Olympic Game Opening Ceremony (北京奥运会开幕式创意）
----Dec. 8th, 2017
12-07-2017 Being a sexually inactive Chinese female should not mean "impossibly can have money"
I filed the official complaint with Massachusetts General Attorney Maura Healey's Office about possible discrimination against me being a sexual inactive female Massachusetts resident who was migrated from the People's Republic of China.
Being a sexually inactive female who was migrated from the People's Republic of China should not mean "impossibly can have my own inheritances from my own birth grandfathers".
Being a sexually inactive female who was migrated from the People's Republic of China should not mean "impossibly can have my hard earned intellectual incomes".
I did call law's help on this possible intentionally blocking me being lawfully provided for via Boston Housing Authority and Boston Transition Department according to what was decided on July 1st of 2004.
I do not know what was the story. It was decided on July 1st of 2004 that I should be provided for by my own money via Boston Housing Authority and Boston Transition Department.
If I am lawfully provided for affluently as decided on July 1st of 2004, by the money which has never been owned by those males who announced-never-wanted-me, who can call me a shit beggar?
12-06-2017 Who needs to shit my name?
12-06-2017 Who needs to shit my name?
Heard this morning's broadcasting about who validated my inheriting.
My response I am happy to make the minor correction that it was announced by the U.S. General Attorney's Secretary who represented U.S. Supreme Court Judges that announced my inheriting on June 30th of 2004 has been valid. Thanks very much.
----Dec. 6th, 2017
Heard this morning's frustration who need to shit all these names.
My response: I share the same anger how my name was shitted.
I am using my ancient Chinese Emperors grandfathers' last name, and I built my name "Min Fang" in English through my own hard working on my non-sexual natured profession, computer science and Basic Medical System related.
It was my own inheriting from my own birth grandfathers' let me have those public meeting chances in 2004 to present the knowledge that I had accumulated inside of me. Those meetings I had in 2004 were never from anybody's charity. Those were my own inheriting meetings.
I knew my last name I inherited was shitted by Chinese government just because Chinese government did not know my ancestors had already moved to my hometown Jinling area (Nanjing, 南京又称金陵）around 1000 years ago at Southern Tang dynasty time(937-976AD) so they announced on the radio I am the fake to demand my inheritances should be theirs to have sayings over.
I knew my name was shitted because some Americans did not know how I made my intellectual income, so they shitted my name to announce on the radio I am a shit beggar that all my intellectual making should be theirs to own.
I knew my name was shitted a never wanted whore just because some females deserve to have a rich man.
I did call laws help on all these shits threw at me via the public channel radio.
----Dec. 6th, 2017
12-05-2017 What is International Monetary Fund
Heard this morning's talk about International Monetary Fund.
My response: International Monetary Fund (IMF) is not United Nation (UN). Both are not financed by donations.
IMF, like a financial institute, use the money to lend loans. UN, like world governments union, used the money to do peacekeeping and developing economies.
The primary difference between the International Monetary Fund, or IMF, and the World Bank lies in their respective purposes and functions. The IMF exists primarily to stabilize exchange rates, while the World Bank’s goal is to reduce poverty. Both organizations were established as part of the Bretton Woods Agreement in 1945.
(https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/043015/what-difference-between-international-monetary-fund-and-world-bank.asp)
----Dec. 5th, 2017
References:
Two Organizations are different on how their financial resources are used.
IMF uses its quota-funded holdings of currencies of financially strong economies, together with its own SDR holdings, to make up its own usable resources to perform its finance lending.
(http://www.imf.org/external/np/exr/facts/pdf/finfac.pdf)
UN uses its funding to cover its peacekeeping operation supporting-budget and its regular budgeted items which includes Strategic framework, its program budget, its contingency fund, etc.
(www.un.org/ga/60/fifth/budgetingprocessstandard.ppt)
Two Organizations are different on it principles and purposes:
IMF is an organization of 189 countries, working to foster global monetary cooperation, secure financial stability, facilitate international trade, promote high employment and sustainable economic growth, and reduce poverty around the world.
(http://www.imf.org/en/About)
UN can take action on the issues confronting humanity in the 21st century, such as peace and security, climate change, sustainable development, human rights, disarmament, terrorism, humanitarian and health emergencies, gender equality, governance, food production, and more.
(http://www.un.org/en/sections/about-un/overview/index.html)
Two Organizations are financed differently:
IMF: Most resources for IMF loans are provided by member countries, primarily through their payment of quotas. Multilateral and bilateral borrowing work as a second and third line of defense by providing a temporary supplement to quota resources.
(http://www.imf.org/en/About/Factsheets/Where-the-IMF-Gets-Its-Money)
UN: Beyond the UN proper, there are a number of related Specialized Agencies, Funds and Programmes. The UN Programmes and Funds, including UNICEF, UNDP, UNHCR and the WFP are financed through voluntary contributions from member countries, and in some cases also from businesses through precarious "corporate partnerships.
(https://www.globalpolicy.org/un-finance/tables-and-charts-on-un-finance/the-financing-of-the-un-programmes-funds-and-specialized-agencies.html)
Two Organizations are different on how their financial resources are used.
IMF uses its quota-funded holdings of currencies of financially strong economies, together with its own SDR holdings, to make up its own usable resources to perform its finance lending.
(http://www.imf.org/external/np/exr/facts/pdf/finfac.pdf)
UN use its funding to cover its peacekeeping operation supporting-budget and its regular budgeted items which includes Strategic framework, its program budget, its contingency fund, etc.
(www.un.org/ga/60/fifth/budgetingprocessstandard.ppt)
----Dec. 5th, 2017
12-04-2017 All about Helping People in Developing Countries through International Monetary Fund
Why International Monetary Fund was persuaded to listen to anonymous me?
My response: Heard International Monetary Fund was persuaded to listen to me by a U.S. diplomat, as you heard from this morning's radio program, was the reason that P. R. Chinese diplomats have been using the same approach with determination to let everyone listen to any female they approved to be the authentic sexually related with a prominent male on any matter that I am related.
That was on July 1st of 2004, I had my huge inheriting on June 30th of 2004, it was just the next day. That diplomat, who is not Mr. David R or any Mr. R, may have heard that I may have some investments in International Monetary Fund through IMF's non-quota funding sources. Not sure if this is the reason.
Heard Tina O'Connor was the reason I was fanned approached in United Nation (New York City location) when I took my parents to visit there. It was after her roommate's visit to my graduation commencement in 2000. Those who graduated the same year from Bridgeport University may have all heard the American guy they saw was living with a British female already after they noticed that guy was alerted to my name. Tina O'Connor was that British female. I heard of his visit in 2004.
*I was not introduced to U.S. Military by David Petraeus or his relatives. BioGate's Secure Transport component was the introduction in January of 2004.
**My inheriting has nothing to do with David Petraeus. David Petraeus was not in June 30th of 2004's meeting. Apple being the smartphone manufacturing company was upon my request in June 30th of 2004's meeting which was based on my vision of smartphones' web surfing as main supplement usage. Apple Company was not invested by any big names other than Mr. Jobs in 2004.
----Dec. 4th, 2017
Heard this morning's talk about Mr. David R's proud introduction of his cousin Mr. John R's achievements.
My response: I heard Mr. John R is a professional connoisseur of paintings. He discovered a lot of great art pieces from regional traditional painters worldwide.
Even though I heard he said I got nothing to do with IMF, I still have to say I have contributed to IMF. His achievements are the proof that I have contributed my own knowledge to IMF.
IMF stands for International Monetary Fund that has been devoted to help developing countries to participate in world trading.
On July 1st of 2004, I was asked if I would be willing to help people in developing countries, I said of course. I was told they have tons of great stuff and I was asked if I could come up with some ideas how to help them.
The first thing came up to my mind was that great stuff must be some sort of rattans, straws or paintings. I enjoy knitting a lot and I know a great knitting piece can be a great piece of art. So, I said show us everything you have, we would filter them. If a piece is great, we trade it the great price of a piece of art. If a piece is a practical piece, we sell it cheap priced.
As you have heard on the radio this morning, R Foundation reached out immediately saying "Just inform us if there is a piece of art", and W company reached out also saying "Just inform us if that is a commodity usage piece." And I heard that great stuff they have were never limited to rattans alike.
I am proud I can help them through International Monetary Fund.
----Dec. 4th, 2017
Heard this morning's broadcasting of International Hospitals.
My response: That is one my proud of proud-s. I was known for "couldn't do my pharmacology final project" when I graduated from Shanghai Medical University in 1990, but I did graduate with the good knowledge.
Those International Hospitals also started with the question "Do you think you should help healthcare in developing countries?"
I grew up in P. R. China, and I had some negative impression about its public hospitals' maintenances and daily crowds. So, when I applied for medical college in 1985, I chose pharmacology major to be a future pharmacologist instead of medicine major to be a medical doctor.
And when I was asked why not invest some hospitals in developing countries, I disagreed if similar hospitals that I had some negative impression about would be what I like to invest. In my vision, I would like to invest in some hospitals like clinics or hospitals in the United States. But this kind of hospitals would not be practical in developing countries.
So, I said, we could invest some tourism-oriented hospitals that majorly serve those from developed countries, tourists or those who work there for international business. And import some licensed medical doctors from developed countries to practice medicine there, so visitors to those hospitals could expect to receive full health care instead of emergency care only.
I was asked "Why not help local people? Do you think we should help people of those countries?" I said, of course, we should.
In my vision, those hospitals should recruit local medical doctors and train them in developed countries, and supporting staffs of those hospitals should be recruited from locals and trained in developed countries. So, these hospitals can be run by the standards to make visitors feel comfortable about the quality of medical services those hospitals provide.
And further, through those local doctors employed by these hospitals, we could associate these hospitals with local medical schools and provide certain training to local doctors employed by local hospitals. Those local doctors may not be able to come to developed countries to study, but they can have these training provided by sharp knowledge healthcare professionals from developed countries.
And, if there is a characteristic local patient, these hospitals can reach out to provide free help, or even transfer this patient to a hospital in a developed country to receive free medical treatment that funded by improving medical treatment purpose. And, if locals have some local characteristic diseases, these hospitals may address those diseases as medical treatment research projects.
So, I was saying, we could help local people by improving quality of medical services they receive.
I am proud I can help them through International Monetary Fund.
----Dec. 4th, 2017
Heard this morning's talk about the potato.
My response: It was as broadcasted sometime ago on this same radio program.
I have been enjoying cooking a lot, but I was never a great chief. My hometown dishes are known for easy cooking skills required. Nanjing Stews (南京砂锅) has been the food I grew up with and I am good at. We, Nanjingese, are known for looking for great tastes and great textures through simple stews. That is why I am picky about taste and texture even I am a lousy "chief".
My father grew up in Shanghai which has been a city known for "talking chiefs city". Every single Shanghainese, a male or a female, can talk-cooking great dishes no matter that person can or cannot cook in a kitchen. My father has taught my mother a lot of talk-cooking great dishes but my mother kept fail his teaching in our kitchen, so I took on this hard job to teach my mother talk-cooking dishes ever since I was little. This is how I learned and practiced being a great talk-cooking chief as you heard on the radio.
I am happy that there are varieties of new flavors of potatoes including rice flavored potatoes, by taste and by texture, that can be cooked like rice now, and there are all kinds of rice flavored or wheat flavored potato varieties that can be produced in a variety of farming weather zones.
What a great achievement from devoted agriculturists. What a great help to improve people's food quality in developing countries.
I am proud I can help them through International Monetary Fund.
----Dec. 4th, 2017
12-03-2017 "The David Petraeus Scandal, Explained" ---- A Borrowed Title
Borrowed title of "The David Petraeus Scandal, Explained".
My response: this "The David Petraeus Scandal, Explained" was borrowed from an article by Adam Weinstein and Mark Follman published on NOV. 12, 2012 8:54 PM.
Retrieved from
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/11/david-petraeus-scandal-explained/
----Dec. 3rd, 2017
Heard this morning's broadcasting of this "The David Petraeus Scandal, Explained".
My response: I finally relaxed about this whole story.
When I read that People's magazine of this story at a church in Boston, I was reading with a reserved expression on my face. The male party is the person I did not recognize, which was a big comfort. But the story was telling the sexual relationship was real, this was the concerned I had if I would be in trouble. But it was mentioned somehow it started after the male party's retirement from the Military.
I was the person chatted with a David Petraeus I met in a Hyatt Regional in Virginal and Washington border area about publish a fake scandal story about him. That chat was on July 1st of 2004.
On June 30th of 2004, I was called to my green card application representing attorney's office to have a teleconference. It was about my inappropriate romance that violated the Military's decision. I was active in service then and I was told that all the questions were from the Marshall Court.
In January of 2004, I was ordered not to have any romance association with the David Petraeus I met after I was recruited. Sometime after that, I agreed to date the David Petraeus I met after a phone conversation with him. That Marshall Court was for what after that phone call.
July of 2004, the David Petraeus I met was on his Marshall Court for the same reason. It was ruled he would be on Probation on his romance until his retirement from the Military.
The chat about the fake scandal was after that ruling. The entire time, both me and the David Petraeus I met were laughing because the ruling of Probation made the plan a fake only. And I was telling everybody he got "enhanced security" on his sexual desire that was offered free from the Military, not a chance the Military would let him make it real.
Heard this morning's story about "Fully Dressed Push-ups" in front of surrounded Military officers and the flick evidence second of mutual sexual relationship. Either both or at least the female party was specially equipped to have this mutual willing sexual relationship. This special equipment was never from that chat of fake scandal I participated on July 1st of 2004.
Before that chat of fake scandal on July 1st of 2004, there was another chat on that same day that I was curious how a female can urinate decently in fields resulted in a clean dress. I was told a folding below crochet area will do the trick. It was a "knowledge" that chuckled everybody who was there, especially those from the entertainment industry.
I do not know anything about what happened after July 1st of 2004. But in that chat of fake scandal on July 1st of 2004, I never "assign" any female to be the featured person in that chatted fake scandal.
I never intended to put the David Petraeus I met into troubles of violating Military Probation. I never involved with anything beyond that chat of fake scandal on July 1st of 2004.
The male party announced he never had anything to do with me, and the female party is the person who never had anything to do with me.
----Dec. 3rd, 2017
12-02-2017 All about who should be the decision-maker of parenting of a child.
Heard this morning's screams of so many prominent wives' determinations on making illegal decisions that have huge or small impacts on my life.
Heard this morning's talk about "Why not financially support Albert Gore's dreams".
My response: Because I do not share his dreams, any of them.
Because I do not share his self-esteem that whatever he dreams means most important.
Heard this morning's broadcasting of China's two females prestigious re-production government.
My response: I heard this same rumor that Chinese government this administration are grouped by seeders of this two female, each mother 6 adult children from 6 different males.
Heard People's Republic of China's current administration is half and half of each's seeders.
Heard one female's first-born was when she was in high school, the other female's firstborn was when she was in junior high school.
听说了这一届中国政府是选了这两个女人的孩子爹们组成的。这两个女人每个都是和6个不同男人有6个已成年孩子。
听说中华人民共和国的这一届政府是由这两个女人的12个孩子爹们一半一半组成的。
听说一个是在高中时生的第一胎，另一个是在初中时生的第一胎。
----Dec. 2nd, 2017
12-01-2017 What is this Radio Program's producing efforts trying to achieve?
Heard this morning's announcement from an enlisted from Chinese Military.
My response: I am a sworn U.S. citizen since June of 2015. I am a U.S Military's 3-Stars General Strategist not active in service.
I do not know what all these announcements are about.
----Dec. 1st, 2017
Heard this morning's confusion why it's a majority P.R. China's team producing a U.S. radio program.
My response: Heard it is to prove a Chinese senior official's wife is talented like some Mrs. Famous you have already heard.
I have complained why their private sexual life goodness deserves to be acknowledged by access-ability to a public microphone.
I have complained this radio program is a public scandal that forces the generic public to worship those females' private womb with a male that the generic public does not even have access to.
Heard 2015's radio program producing group has come back for holiday seasons' goodies' since end of October. Radio company let go some producers by end of October in order to re-contract this group of producing team just for the holiday season. This is the same like last year's holiday season.
I have complained this radio program is a public robbery scandal that holiday time is theirs' to announce whoever's belongings to be claimed their holiday's gifts to take.
I have complained those announcements this radio program made have always followed by some promotion efforts to let "gifts" transferred to those deserved patrons as announced.
This trend started since 2015's holiday season. I did call law enforcement's help about those announcements. I refuse to let my belongings to be announced and/or claimed their gifts.
----Dec. 1st, 2017
Since 2007 or 2010, whenever there was a discussion about some deserves, there was an announcement stating who should have this being discussed money at the end of the discussion, and the real money transferred to that being announced person's bank account after broadcasting.
The reason for on-radio discussion was because the discussing group did not know how I earned this being discussed intellectual income, and this on-radio discussion proved their intelligence, which was good enough to have my intellectual income that being discussed to be transferred into their bank account.
I did call laws help to get back my hard earned intellectual income.
-----published Nov. 28th, 2017
Radio program has been kept on very busy: Radio Producers are busy on fighting to get the microphone, Chinese Government is busy on announcing I am unwanted fake on the radio, British Royals are busy on acclaiming British deserves a rich American husband, American Riches are busy on yelling "I said so", Hispanics Females are busy on confusing everybody who father their children, Prominent Wives are busy on proving they are intelligent enough to manage everybody else' matters, Big Names are busy on expressing their confusion, money-wanters like Albert Gore, by rumor, are busy on sneak-in to announce the ownership of some money, All above shared choir of "Why can't I have her money"....
All I can do and I have done is kept on calling law enforcement's help and kept on speaking up for myself. What else should I do?
-----published Nov. 28th, 2017
My Personal Experience:
11-30-2017 I did not recognize People's magazine's published Photos is a True Statement
Heard this morning's announcement that David Petraeus never even met me.
My response: I met a person in Hyatt Regional in Virginia, Washington area in 2003. I was told his name is David Petraeus. I did not recognize the David Petraeus published in the People's magazine or Chinese newspaper World Journal is a true statement.
I never had any heartbroken feeling about all these "David Petraeus never wanted you" promotion on the radio and in Boston, Massachusetts.
I never spent David Petraeus' money, or his family's, or relatives' money. I was never provided for by David Petraeus' money, or his family's money, or his relatives' money. I could not even associate People's magazine's or World Journal's David Petraeus with the person I met.
I was never heartbroken by all these hostilities expressed by David Petraeus on the radio.
----Nov. 30th, 2017
Heard this morning's broadcasting caused confusion about who father the 4 children.
My response: I would say the radio program once broadcasted Jessica Pejoves(Petroves?) mothers 4 children. This morning's is Jessica R mothers 4 children from James R (David Petraeus).
----Nov. 30th, 2017
Heard this morning's broadcasting of a Chinese female who mother a CHILD from Chines Premiere's.
My response: She is one of the patrons that I decided to call law enforcement's help before I call her a psycho.
By rumor I hear, she had stalked me in my glass house cancer treatment. She kept contact treatment providers' staff to bill me but not to provide treatment for me and transfer money to her. She requested all these very seriously because she mothers a child from the Chinese Premiere and I was never wanted by the Chinese Premiere. And she confirms the Chinese Premiere has nothing to do with me is a true statement.
I heard she did succeed sometimes because of her maiden last name (Fong or Fang), so I called law enforcement's help to find out if she is a criminal.
*If her maiden name is Fang is the reason she thinks that is her lawful money as well, she should go to an attorney to ask for help to find out.
----Nov. 30th, 2017
Heard those frustrated voices about "Why not interested in Albert Gore".
My response: I heard those frustrated voices are from Albert Gore's romance partners. I heard the frustrations were caused by my refusal to provide for Albert Gore and his associated, and the questions were asked out of disbelieves because he has been very popular among Chinese females sexually.
I did not know anything about Albert Gore other than the name printed in the newspapers before July 1st of 2004. I do not his romances at all and I am not interested to know either.
On July 1st of 2004, I was aware he is a grandfather already. This already impressed me that the grandfather should be an Old and Dry on romance-related matters that I should call a Mr. Senior.
I must say I am a Chinese U.S. female citizen, but I am really not interested in anyone who was already a Mr. Senior that stands for Old and Dry in 2004 already. I am really not interested at all about a Mr. Senior in 2004 who is 13 years more senior now.
----Nov. 30th, 2017
11-29-2017 All about clarifications on Family & Inheriting
Heard this morning's broadcasting of "mutual agreement" of his family wealth.
My response: Who are the two parties to this "mutual agreement" to announce a "car accident" to promote the younger child to the necessity of inheriting the family wealth? And such a family in general, not the direct father-son line by blood? And how generic is this family?
*In 2012, only the girl was published. At least, the girl is "acknowledged his child".
----Nov. 29th, 2017
Heard this morning's talk about the "cancellation of providing from China".
My response: I have accused People's Republic of China's government may have spent money cause me infected heavily, is this spending the "providing" need to be canceled?
Other than this virus infection accusation I made from some rumors I heard, I have never been provided for by People's Republic of China's money. I had received the free education including college education as People's Republic of China's citizen.
I have to mention that the majority of People's Republic of China's colleges, in 1985 when I went to college, was established from my birth great-great-grandfather's, my birth great-grandfather's, my birth grandfather's (方智仁) and my own entrust' donation in early 1900 ( the Republic of China ruling time's Ningbo Fang's House 民国时期的宁波方家). The college I graduated from and the college my father graduated from were both established by those donations.
This is plus the contributions I made to the People's Republic of China that were acknowledged by the People's Republic of China's government before 2012, some of which were featured on this same radio program before 2014.
*Too bad, other than my father's, I only know my grandfather's name: Fang, Zhiren (方智仁). 😈
** I have never spent any Rockefeller's money, I have never been provided for by any Rockefeller's money, nor by any Walton's money, nor by any Ford's money. I have been raised by my own birth legal parents, and I have been provided for by my own money, either by my hard earned own making or by my own birth grandfathers' blessing I inherited.
*** My providing for my biological & legal parents was decided on July 1st of 2004. I am providing for my own biological & legal parents.
----Nov. 29th, 2017
Heard this morning's mention of a Mr. Fang.
My response: The knee down is from the group who respect this Mr. Fang is the heir of Zu's family. And I heard there is one person mentioned, in this morning's broadcasting, that this Mr. Fang has no financial inheritance reserved from Zu's family.
This Mr. Fang has nothing to do with my family and my inherited wealth.
Zu's family's original family name is Zu (Zhu, 朱) which was originated from Chinese Ming Dynasty (1368AD– 1644AD).
My family's original family name is Leu (Liu, 刘) which was originated from Chinese East Han dynasty (25 AD - 220 AD). Later my family's name changed to Lee (Li, 李) sometime before my ancestors were Chinese Tang dynasty Emperors ( 618AD - 907AD). I do not know when my family name changed to current Fang (方), but I heard that was after my ancestors moved to Zhejiang province.
*My grandfathers, Southern Tang Emperors(南唐, 937 AD–976 AD), were still having Lee(Li) as the family name when they were in Nanjing area. My father attained Nanjing University in the 1960s and stayed in Nanjing after graduation, I was born in Nanjing in 1967, almost 1000 years after my ancestors left Nanjing area.
----Nov. 29, 2017
11-28-2017 Why this radio program is a public scandal
Heard this morning's broadcasting of why this radio program is produced like such a public scandal.
My response: I contribute what else I complained about:
Since 2007 or 2010, whenever there was a discussion about some deserves, there was an announcement stating who should have this being discussed money at the end of the discussion, and the real money transferred to that being announced person's bank account after broadcasting.
The reason for on-radio discussion was because the discussing group did not know how I earned this being discussed intellectual income, and this on-radio discussion proved their intelligence, which was good enough to have my intellectual income that being discussed to be transferred into their bank account.
And all these were, by rumor, organized and announced by Albert Gore, because he had led the United States for 8 years.
I have announced I have nothing to do with this Albert Gore, and I did file complaints about this Albert Gore's murder attempt for money. I did call laws help to get back my hard earned intellectual income.
Also, all these were backed up, by rumor, by Mr. O'Connor who complained that making an announcement was how his wealth being owned by me.
I have clarified that the wealth Mr. O'Connor complained about is my grandfather's entrust that I inherited according to my grandfather's will on June 30th, 2004. My inheriting has been valid according to U.S. laws. Mr. O'Connor was aware I am the sole beneficiary person of my grandfather's will and that Fund was set up by my grandfather's entrust. Mr. O'Connor was confused because of a letter his great-grandfather wrote almost 200 years ago.
Mr. Petroves, an American, had complained about the same issue as Mr. O'Connor. I have to clarify here that I had inherited more than one grandfathers' entrusts according to my grandfathers' wills together with Funds that setup by those entrusts. All my inheriting have been valid according to U.S. laws.
----Nov. 28th, 2017
Why there is no radio company's management in producing managing?
My response: Being the victim impacted by this radio program's broadcasting, I can see the efforts of radio company management trying to find out what happened.
I also heard, radio company's CEO's wife is a Hispanic. Rumored she has a cousin was rapped-like in front of the male's relatives. And the male that Mrs. Pittman was told and verified, by rumor, was the person publicly acknowledged that her cousin is a wife-like to him. Rumored he is currently providing for Mrs. Pittman's cousin's 6-month old child in Jamaica.
Mrs. Pittman, by rumor, understood that is the same person who fathers my children. I was wondering why would he do that public declaration of his sexual desire to his relatives in his 40s, and I really hope he is indeed strong as a 20s. He is almost 50 years old now. And I heard that 6 months old child is not seeded by the person who fathers my children.
----Nov. 28th, 2017
Heard this morning's broadcasting of "I thank you for let me have the money, bla bla."
My response: I need some advice on this. I have been harassed like so for several years through my glass house cancer.
I did write tons of letters to FBI because I figured it is more appropriate to let FBI officers identify if they are criminals first instead of assuming they are psychos directly.
What else I heard of, there are tons of people willing to represent me voluntarily and to make decisions on my lawful interests without me even heard of these decisions.
What else should I do? Clarify these on the radio? I need to be advised on how? Why? Listen:
Radio program has been kept on very busy: Radio Producers are busy on fighting to get the microphone, Chinese Government is busy on announcing I am unwanted fake on the radio, British Royals are busy on acclaiming British deserves a rich American husband, American Riches are busy on yelling "I said so", Hispanics Females are busy on confusing everybody who father their children, Prominent Wives are busy on proving they are intelligent enough to manage everybody else' matters, Big Names are busy on expressing their confusion, money-wanters like Albert Gore, by rumor, are busy on sneak-in to announce the ownership of some money, All above shared choir of "Why can't I have her money"....
All I can do and I have done is kept on calling law enforcement's help and kept on speaking up for myself. What else should I do?
-----Nov. 28th, 2017
11-27-2017 All About Viagra(Blue) and Why is my contribution.
Heard this morning's broadcasting of the tears on July 1st of 2004 when Viagra (Blue) was announced.
My response: A lot of people can not relate to this emotional moments, especially a lot of intelligent ladies who married to great men and gave up their profession for the family they love.
So I use this love story that is common for a movie theater to illustrate what that emotion is like.
A boy and girl has grown up in the same neighborhood and became sweethearts in high school. They were each other's first time. They went to different colleges and became best friends.
They both got a job in the same city and stayed close whenever they need each other's comforts. They both thought they may end up getting married. After some looking around, she stopped fancy a marriage without him and started to plan her life with him in every big or small of her dreams.
But he is still looking around. She was there share his excitement when he met a girl with the comfortableness that he will come back to her like he usually does. A year later, he told her the wedding date is set and invitations have mailed out. She looked at him, and all she knows is no matter how close they are, no matter how she means to him, that girl is going to be his bride on that wedding day. No matter how many dreams she had that has sweet him in there, she just has to move on.
That is the emotion those researchers from other pharmaceutical companies felt on that day. Some started their careers right after their college graduation, and research has been right there in their reach. With all those devoted work for decades, unless they can find something completely different with what Viagra(Blue) team got, they just won't be able to have THE PATENT.
----Nov. 27th, 20117
Why was I crying if I was not a research?
My Response: My major in college is pharmacology that come with 3-years Basic Medical System education. I was in the industry after graduation and I was aware of there have been tons of research from Basic Medical System side and from the Pharmaceutical side. Pharmacology is a profession between Pharmacist and Medical Doctor.
On Basic Medical system side, research is focused on some unknowns, such as erect-able issue after almost perfect clean prostate surgery, to find out how human bodies naturally functioned to better understand the root cause of such health issues. It has been a known issue that a male's member cannot erect after a prostate surgery, even it is clear that surgery did not damage any known erecting related biological parts or related nerve system. Basic Medical System researchers are focusing on what else, be it hormone generating related or neurotransmitter mechanism related, that can be erecting related that may be affected by the surgery. Those researchers are normally rewarded for Noble Prize for their big findings.
On pharmaceutical side, researchers are focused on what can be done to those health issues that are generated from the known root cause, such as find out what compound that can simulate erecting related hormone or can stimulate generating erecting related hormones, etc. The compound would latter become medication, etc. These researchers are rewarded for PATENTS of the compounds that can provide treatments or improvements of the known health issues.
What I figured out is there is no need to fully resolve the human reproduction issue caused by unable to erect. The common knowledge about human reproduction is "Sperms generating first, male member erecting follows". Help to generate sperms to enable erecting is the common route for both Basic Medical System research and Pharmaceutical research on this matter*.
My contribution that recorded on a June Sunday in 2004 was "Let the man can enjoy his sex life first by helping his member erect through some local stimulating mechanism to enlarge sponge area only instead of stimulating through hormone generating, then worry about how to help this man to have a child carry his blood.".
I started to cry because I heard that Mister said: "enlarge". I knew for certain that not many people figured out what I got. I thought I had missed it this close.
11-26-2017 I filed discrimination complaint about "impossible can have any money because of sexually inactive"
Heard Tina O'Connor (Helena O'Connor) is still lingering in the radio program's producing.
My response: I filed complain to BBB about this radio program's sever sexual harassment. I heard FCC is like "O'Connors' family FCC" currently, and I can tell they all love this Tina O'Connor, cousin of theirs, very much. So I decided to file my complaint with BBB* before I find out which government agency to file this complaint yet. *Better Business Bureau, a non-government organization.
Heard she is privileged this round is because she is someone's younger illegitimate child. But I also heard she carries O'Connors' family look and the "rumored real biological father" is not a British.
I do not feel bad, at least not strongly, for this Tina O'Connor's confusion about her personal life and her confusion of my inheritance fund. But I do appreciate O'Connors' honesty about their family confusion is their grandfather's letter, not denying it is my grandfather's entrusted money and I am the sole beneficiary of my grandfather's will.
I met him early than her which was confirmed in January of 2004 already. She had been his roommate for 7 years only from her own willingness to move-in and her own refusal to move out. This was complained by him in January of 2004. And this adds to the fact she is the mother of her own attorney husband's children. (She is a wife to an attorney, not a Business person.)
My anger is: My inheritance fund has supported O'Connors families to contribute to the United States is not the reason she can be privileged to shit me all over on a public channel radio. That is no matter how confused she is about her great-grandfather's letter, She knows that fund is my grandfather's entrusted fund and I am the heir in this grandfather's will.
-----Nov. 26th, 2017
About my cash providing has been stopped.
My response: Per my side story, I had three inheriting related meetings in 2004, January's was to validate my Identity, June 30th was the inheriting day. And July 1st of 2004 was the one that a lot of arrangements had made regarding my decision to move up to Boston, MA from New York City area.
These arrangements include: Invested a clinic(Whittier Street Clinic) across the street in case of medical emergency. Arranged this apartment I am currently living with some cash/Foodstamp assistances, etc. All these were with payment discussion.
I was supposed to move to another spacious lodging at a better location provided by Boston Housing Authority, and having better cash providing from Boston Transition Department or Social Security till my entrust finish. And my entrust suppose to finish when my health is better.
I have been shited by this radio program and its promotion as "beggar with no money because of unwanted status with inactive sexual activities".
And my precious $300 cash providing stopped on 25th is the trigger that I filed complaints to General Attorney of Massachusetts. I need cash. I have been screaming I need to have more cash and now this precious $300/month was stopped. So I file an official complaint last night saying this is sexually related discrimination against me being sexually inactive since I moved up to Boston, MA in 2004.
*I may need to check this cash providing again today. I was confused about the date on 24th but I did receive a letter saying it would stop on 24th of this month.
I complain BHA legal department refuse to check if I have money "because I was never a Mistress like their friends". As you heard on the radio, there are too many Hispanic women fighting to be the real one who has a child with the person who may father my two children. And if you ever go into Boston Housing Authority building, you will be impressed that is a Hispanic majority department, a real majority. Its Legal Department is the only department, possibly, that has all white employees (Two only).
To be honestly, I do not know if there is anyone of those Hispanic females who featured on the radio program that has any association with the person who fathers my children. Maybe not even one is the serious complaint I have about this radio program.
It is not a white female, other than Tina O'Connor, I am complaining about this upgrading. My complaint is: After I provided references to BHA, my argument has been why don't they check the meeting record if the decided amount has paid to the BHA account as decided in July 1st of 2004's meeting, and they just kept ignoring it. And by rumors I hear, it is because I am unwanted and that is paid by somebody who never wanted me or doesn't want me anymore.
I do not know which fund suppose to pay for this. I have more than one inheritance funds that invested in some very respectful companies. The paying check is from this or that respectful company's investor accounts which is from my own money invested in the company, not this or that prominent man's money.
When I kept saying that is my own money, the rumor I heard is BHA is not certain who ultimate owns the paying account and they cannot let me use that paid amount because of this uncertainty, or that has to be understood as a donation that should pay for either whoever in need or some females screaming in-bed now. And all these left me in a situation constantly facing threats to be evicted from my current apartment.
My anger is: Why not check if that paid amount is valid lawful payment for my exclusive usage? They cannot verify who ultimately owns the paying account but they can verify if the paid amount is lawful valid payment which is for my exclusive usage, with law enforcement's help if necessary.This is the same complaint about Boston Transition Department.
----Nov. 26th, 2017
11-25-2017 What really confused these wives in this morning's broadcasting?
Heard this morning's confusion about who is who's real husband.
My response: To be accurate, this is "my response"not "my echo". Let me explain why.
I have been harassed for several years that I should "not be allowed" to say I had met this person because the person I met should be another one. I had to clarify every time that I was told what his name is by himself in front of his colleges in Military uniforms.
I had not got certain who is who on this morning's broadcasting yet, but my ears picked up the confusion that one female's husband was the one who got the inheritance, and The Inheritance mentioned is not another one's husband's inheritable. Whose money is this that causes this argument if the two do not share the same father? Why I got this anxious feeling that it sounds like I am in the picture because my inheritance being the confused money in these arguments?
I must emphasize that I got all my inheritances because who my birth lawful father is, my valid lawful inheriting in 2004 got nothing to do with my romance experiences.
I appreciate the announcement from a female saying I have nothing to do with a David Petroves. It is a true statement.
I heard the Tokyo airport charter terminal's romance story in 1975 or so from the Chinese female featured in this morning's broadcasting was with a David Petroves name.
----Nov. 25th, 2017
Heard some questioned what was my assignment on July 1st of 2004 that made me having commanding power.
My response: I do not remember, but I do remember all U.S. Military 5-Stars were there when I made all those requests to Military Supply Corp in a very commanding manner.
----Nov. 25th, 2017
11-24-2017 Why I was recruited a 3-Stars General's rank with commanding power
Heard this morning's broadcasting saying I am the one David Petraeus willing to spend money for.
My response: That is maybe an accurate expression of saying "willing" because it is practically "willing only".
He had paid for a month or so of my medical expense ($500,000 or so) and that amount has been taken from my pre-paid $400 million per year medical expense by his wife Holly Knowlton. And some other incidents are similar to this.
My current pre-paid medical expenses are paid by a check clearly with "investor" printed on it.
I currently only have security and medical big expenses which are all provided by my own money. I appreciate his willingness expression but I have to clarify it is practically a "willingness" only.
What annoyed me is Holly Knowlton's cousins may have taken more of my money from my intellectual incomes. I did call laws help on this annoying matter.
----Nov. 24th, 2017
Heard yesterday's broadcasting about a U.S. Military General's scandalous comment about me.
My response: That comment was from a U.S. Military General who did not know why I could be a combat officer having a 3-Stars Military General's rank at recruiting.
It normally takes a military's combat division personnel 20 years in-service to be promoted to a Military 3-Stars. That is the reason I explained that I was recruited in research division, same as a researcher in Technology Corp or Medical Corp, that always recruited with the Military ranks associated with the level of knowledge in research specialty.
I was recruited as Military Strategist makes me a combat officer because my acknowledged research achievements are on the martial strategy that seeks to answer the question, "How will we win this war?"(Batman, 2015) and studies the specifics of planning for, and engaging in combat, and attempts to reduce the many factors to a set of principles that govern all interactions of the field of battle. (Wikipedia, 2017).
A Military Strategist from research division does have commanding power when on assignment.
----Nov. 24th, 2017
Please refer my explanation on this.
Japanese Military in WWII and U.S. Military in Vietnam War
Military Science and Military Strategy
Batman(2015).Understanding Military Strategy and the Four Levels of War. retrieved from http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/news/a39985/four-levels-of-war/
Wikipedia (2017)/ Military Strategy. retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_science
11-23-2017 All about Military Science and Military Strategist
Heard this morning's argument between two possible real wives who both refused to authorize me a U.S. Military 3-Stars General rank.
My response: I am a not-enlisted U.S. Military 3-Stars General is authorized by U.S. Military, not by any wife to any enlisted U.S. Military personnel, authentic or not.
I am proud I am a U.S. Military 3-Stars General Strategist.
Before I was recruited in January of 2004, the "in-argument authentic real marriage's" possible partner was asked by the recruiter, his colleague, if I was qualified. This may be the reason for this morning's argument about who was sitting there with whom at that moment.
----Nov. 23rd, 2017
Heard the saying of how could it possible that I can have a 3-Stars General's rank by half an hour speech.
My response: It is real that I became a U.S. Military 3-Star General after a half hour speech by being the first person making the point that "Japanese Military was the best-performed military in WWII" at the Strategic level of wars where decisions occur.
I was recruited as a 3-Stars U.S. Military General Strategist in January of 2004. Tons of requests I made to U.S. Military Supply Corps on July 1st of 2004 were made as a U.S. Military 3-Stars General Strategist, a combat officer, to enhance combat effectiveness, not as a technology researcher officer or medical researcher officer.
Military Strategists are mainly practitioners, some are mainly scholars. I think I was recruited as a scholar Military Strategist that "framing the battle space" of Japanese Military in WWII in January of 2004, and I was a practitioner Military Strategist that "evaluating theories, models and perspectives for the artful future application of military and strategic power." on July 1st of 2004.
----Nov. 23rd, 2017
"A major in Military & Strategic Studies prepares you to lead and operate across the spectrum of conflict throughout the world.
MSS majors learn to think as strategists, framing the battle space, and evaluating theories, models and perspectives for the artful future application of military and strategic power."
----retrieved from United Air Force Academy website on Nov. 23rd, 2017 from https://www.usafa.edu/academic/military-strategic-studies/
"There are four levels of warfare. These are the Political, Strategic, Operational, and Tactical levels of war. " (ROBERT BATEMAN, 2015)
----retrieved on Nov. 23rd, 2017 from
http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/news/a39985/four-levels-of-war/
"Military science is the study of military processes, institutions, and behavior, along with the study of warfare, and the theory and application of organized coercive force.[1] It is mainly focused on theory, method, and practice of producing military capability in a manner consistent with national defense policy. Military science serves to identify the strategic, political, economic, psychological, social, operational, technological, and tactical elements necessary to sustain relative advantage of military force; and to increase the likelihood and favorable outcomes of victory in peace or during a war. Military scientists include theorists, researchers, experimental scientists, applied scientists, designers, engineers, test technicians, and other military personnel."
"Military strategy is in many ways the centerpiece of military science. It studies the specifics of planning for, and engaging in combat, and attempts to reduce the many factors to a set of principles that govern all interactions of the field of battle."
----retrieved from Wikipedia website on Nov. 23rd, 2017 from the website: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_science
Combat effectiveness measures the ability of a military force to accomplish its objective and is one component of overall military effectiveness.
The effectiveness of a military unit in performing its mission depends on its capabilities (including equipment and personnel) and its ability to use those capabilities.
----retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/topic/combat-effectiveness
11-22-2017 The U.S. military is the Authority on U.S. Military matters, not a housewife.
Heard this morning's "impossible a 3-stars General" angry confrontation from a housewife.
My response: I am a 3-stars U.S. Military General, Strategist not enlisted. This was validated by a U.S. military spokesperson on the radio program on Oct. 11th or Nov. 8th, 2017 or so when my lifetime achievements were acknowledged. That is the reason I am authorized by U.S. Military to wear U.S. Military 3-stars General's Service Dress Uniforms.
I advise this housewife, who may be very prominent in the People's Republic of China, to hold her tongue on who should be the authority on U.S. military matters.
*3-stars U.S. Military General, a Strategist not enlisted.
退役三星将军参谋长。
*A Strategist is a combat research position, not a technology or medical research position.
参谋长属战斗部队编制军衔而非科技或医学研究编制军衔。
*A Strategist is a combat officer, not a supply officer.
参谋长是战斗部队将官，不是后勤部队将官。
----Nov. 22nd, 2017
About "Lined-up" marriage and its bow loop.
My response: A lined-up marriage is a term referring to some married couples that grouped by father another man's wife's child or mother another woman's husband's child. No child shared between married husband and wife.
It has weird bow rule that father of the child bow to the husband of the child's mother; and the mother of the child bow to the wife of the child's father.
And any husband or wife in any sequential number of marriage in this "lined-up marriage" can be a doggie bottom if the marriage partner is the need-to-bow-to and two adjacent marriage are coping willingly or not willing to make this husband or wife a bow only.
The Father of the Child -------->
Husband 1 -> Husband2 -> Husband 3->Husband4->Husband5
↓ ⇈
Above: Illustrating that the Doggie Bottom is Wife 3
<-------The Mother of the Child
In this loop, wife 3 need t bow to her own husband in her marriage, father of her child (husband 2) cannot help her because he needs to bow, for some reason, to his wife in his own marriage as well, and mother of her husband's child is not willing to bow to her because father of her child (husband 3) is this wife 3 bows to and willing to spoil her (wife 4).
The Father of the Child -------->
Husband 1 -> Husband2 -> Husband 3->Husband4->Husband5
⇊ ↑
Above: Illustrating that the Doggie Bottom is Husband 3
<-------The Mother of the Child
In this loop, Husband3 need t bow to his own wife in his marriage, mother of his child (wife 4) cannot help him because she needs to bow to her husband, for some reason, in her own marriage as well, and father of his wife's child is not willing to bow to him because mother of his child (wife 3) is this husband3 bows to and willing to support him (husband2).
I screamed out loud in 2015 that I was a doggie bottom because of this "line-up marriage" just by rumors. I refused to be that wife 3 in this illustration loop just by rumors. I refuse.
I just wonder why any financial well-being male or female would willing to be in this doggie bottom?
----Nov. 22nd, 2017
11-21-2017 All about name confusions
Heard this morning's broadcasting reflected confusion of David Petrovis and David Petraeus,
My Response: David Petraeus is the U.S. Army General who I met at a Hyatt Regional's lobby in Washington area in 2003.
David Petrovis is the person with a family name I respect hugely. There are more than several young Davids from this respectful Petrovis name in the U.S. currently, and I heard this one is currently dating a Chinese female whose disputes with me about the one I met was featured on the radio program a couple of months ago.
I have to make my response like what was featured this morning. I am not willing to be the subject of constant challenges, insults, and demands of financial providing* out of jealousy, competitiveness from this name confusion. This has been my complaints regarding Ford name.
* I do not know how Chinese communities have this weird illusion that a sexual relationship between a female and a male should mean provided by me, like the psycho-like requests "I told you I never wanted her, Why can't I spend her money" as you heard from their National leaders on the radio program. I just kept saying "I refuse."
----Nov. 21st, 2017
Heard sayings reflected from this morning's broadcasting about my investment in a respectful company.
My response: That is still my money still investing in the same respectful company, but as an investor is addressed. This may be the reason for these rumors.
----Nov. 21st, 2017
About my complaints regarding Ford name confusions.
My response: I reacted because these name confusions, if intended to produce a show, has not been well-managed to ensure my life would not be impacted. I have concerned my children have been exposed to hatred alike reactions from this intentional name confusions.
I did inform the law enforcement about possible hate crime and sexual harassment intended in producing as well as promoting this radio program this way.
----Nov. 21st, 2017
About my being the heir of my own family.
My response: Entertainment industry's college graduated females often have opportunities to be invited into luxury life by a business person or a rich prominent person they associate with from work. The wonderful feeling of growing into luxury may have contributed the saying of "hang on to breast & butt attraction".
I am the major featured person in this radio program but I am not an entertainment professional. I met these attractive great prominent males, but I was not into their luxury life by my sexual activities. I am having the same financial comfortableness as those great prominent males that provided by my own maiden birth grandfathers' blessing so that I do not need to practice sexual attraction to have a wonderful luxury life.
I was brought up by the expectation of being an heir to run a house as the head of the house, not the expectation of running a house as a housewife. There are doubts why my current financial situation is so thrift, but that is my decision for some good reasons out of my characters of "not willing to see my money not spent on myself as I wish". No matter what doubts might be there, I know my money is mine to spend as I wish after this "hard time".
I am not the person willing to be competed by breast & butts attractions for luxury, and I am not the person interested in housewives' talks of everybody's romances. I have been fed up all this time with all these name confusions and insist-on accusing me being a stuck-on to this or that prominent male.
I won't be the person a bit afraid of this or that prominent name to hold my tongue when I am insulted by their associated females, and I won't hesitate to take legal actions when I see intolerable.
----Nov. 21st, 2017
11-20-2017 Some more confusions about agreed-upon-providing
Heard this morning's talk of an Ambassador.
My response: Heard the rumor that her personal life plan is the reason she was promoted to be an Ambassador. I was surprised because an Ambassador is a public post to represent the government even without a paycheck.
Heard her personal life plan is to be wanted by a U.S. citizen rich man. Heard her personal life plan can only be achieved by letting my children without their father. Heard her personal life plan was helped by those pathetic-s who are so proud all they can do and all they good at is to mix-and-match human beings' sexual activities.
I won't be the person can hold my tongue on this matter, and I won't be the person would be confused who should be called the troublemaker on this matter, and I won't be the person so afraid of facing these insults.
I did inform law enforcement about possible prostitution business involvement on this matter.
----Nov. 20th, 2017
Heard some confusion about agreed-upon-providing.
My response: Agreed-upon-providing is not attorney fee. It was the agreed-upon-support that provided to those devoted to serve the countries that also having a family to support at the time when serving the countries means no personal income. This agreed-upon-providing(agreed-upon-support) is in process of stopping.
My inheritance that has been providing this agreed-upon-providing (agreed-upon-support) was not a client to those being-provided-for because of this agreed-upon-providing (agreed-upon-support).
My inheritance that has been providing this agreed-upon-providing (agreed-upon-support) is not a client to those being-provided-for's family-owned-attorney-business because of this agreed-upon-providing (agreed-upon-support).
This explanation is to all my inheritances.
I, Min Fang, was not a client to those being-provided-for because of this agreed-upon-providing (agreed-upon-support).
I, Min Fang, is not a client to those being-provided-for's family-owned-attorney-business because of this agreed-upon-providing (agreed-upon-support).
----Nov. 20th, 2017
Heard saying why side lines are also provided(supported) for by this agreed-upon-providing(agreed-upon-support).
My response: My inheritance fund only responsible for transferring agreed-upon amount of support one-installment per year as agreed-upon to the one-and-only bank account number owned by the provided(supported)-for-family as agreed-upon. It is purely their own family financial matters beyond this.
----Nov. 20th, 2017
Reference Link: 11-15-2017 I own my claimed wealth lawfully is Validated （“我和中国政府的矛盾”附后）
My inherited wealth are all entrusted before the People's Republic of China even exists.
My investments outside the People's Republic of China are never any charities or donations from the People's Republic of China.
My investments in the People's Republic of China are all lawful investments that conduct lawful business and pay required taxes according to U.S. laws and People's Republic of China's laws.
11-19-2017 Child Trafficking is a Huge Crime in the United States and In the People's Republic of China（贩卖儿童在美国及在中华人民共和国都是严重犯罪行为）
Heard this morning's shocking proud of abusing 4500 children to get money.
My response: What I heard is these children are "organized to be imported into" United States just to help somebody fulfilled the ambition "to let me pay for it". They are now, by rumor, in the United States without their parents' accompany and intended to stay on "regular business donations".
I did inform law enforcement about this shocking child trafficking announcement from what I heard what was broadcasted this morning on the radio program.
I did express myself that I refuse to be the victim of this organized larceny crimes through business spending.
I did express myself that I refuse to let my money into any criminal business like so.
I did express myself that I refuse to let anyone who is determined to abuse managerial power or work-power to have the opportunities to let my money involved in crimes including these crimes to make myself a victim as well.
I did express myself that I refuse to pay for these children and I refuse to provide for these children.
----Nov. 19th, 2017
Heard these children are trafficked from the People's Republic of China with this Chinese government's help.
My response: My inherited wealth are all entrusted before the People's Republic of China even exists.
My investments outside the People's Republic of China are never any charities or donations from the People's Republic of China.
My investments in the People's Republic of China are all lawful investments that conduct lawful business and pay required taxes according to U.S. laws and People's Republic of China's laws.
According to the People's Republic of China's laws, Chinese citizens' children are those children's own parents' obligations to raise or the People's Republic of China's government's obligation to help to raise.
I, Min Fang, refuse to be the victim of this organized crime that intends to spend or use my money without my willingness.
----Nov. 19th, 2017
Heard these children are "imported" with some special help.
My response: I did inform law enforcement about this.
I also informed law enforcement about rumors that this radio program's producing effort is to get my money without my own willingness and rumors about my medical treatment that you heard on the radio.
And I did express myself to the law enforcement that I refuse to be the victim.
I did clarify some reasons that caused confusion of ownership regarding my inherited wealth. I do not know what else is so confusing other than some financial desires that I consider inappropriate.
----Nov. 19th, 2017
Heard some said that if I intend to be cured of my glass house cancer, I best to keep quiet no matter what I hear.
My response: That is very and very hard for me. I am already staying very, very calm so that I have not shoot like a rocket every time.
And I won't request special arrangement to help me hear these because I already called laws help.
----Nov. 19th, 2017
11-18-2017 2007 July Stadium Event
Heard this morning's broadcasting of "July Stadium Wedding" event.
My response: As explained this morning, event participants (Bride and Groom) or wedding organizer were all never associate with me romantically. Heard there was over 1000 in-person attendee. I was a name-attendee of the event that was introduced by over 400 voice-attendee of the event. Heard there was over 1000 take-part-in-person-attendee that celebrated the event that day at the stadium. This morning's broadcasting was not a replay of that 2007's event. This morning's broadcasting was a 10-years celebration of the 2007 event with about 500 voice-attendee that includes 100 new choir members.
----Nov. 18th, 2017
Heard this morning's explanation of why producing this radio program using editing techniques that used in Oscar movie "crash".
My response: I agree that this radio program had been this popular and phenomena in U.S. and in the entire world as reflected by this morning's explanation. This radio program has been a great achievement that presented producers' great talents. Hope this morning's explanation can bring out more explanations with positive intentions.
----Nov. 18th, 2017
Heard there was some confusion when I was born.
My response: I was born in 1967 as broadcasted in 2006 or so. The confusion is from Chinese version that broadcasted 1971. It was Chinese version only and I do not know who is this 1971-born. No such person associated with me as far as I know. Heard it was concluded a producing mistake in 2006 in China.
----Nov. 18th, 2017
Heard some confusion if I provide for my parents and why same equally
My response: I do provide for them same equally as decided on July 1st of 2004.
My inherited wealth was from my father side grandfathers' blessing. But I am a biological daughter to both of my parents, not an in-law. And I was raised by both of my parents. Of course, I provide for my parents same equally if that is my money, and I do consider my inheritance is my money.
I do not think I have any money-anchor child who has parents that do not include me deserve to be provided for same equally by my money. And I do my best never put any child carries my blood to be in that situation.
----Nov. 18th, 2017
11-17-2017 About some frustrations expressed in this morning's broadcasting
Heard this morning's confrontation from O'Connors.
My response: Heard O'Connors decided to leave it as it is. Let me explain what this is about here.
It was about what I published yesterday. The reason I published so yesterday is that some O'Connors declared either I am not allowed to say that I own the fund or they need to validate how I own the fund. I understood it as they either try to block me from spending my own money or try to dig out all bank accounts information. So, as you heard this morning, O'Connors were fighting that I can't include all O'Connors which is about 200 and I was explaining "there are more than one O'Connor to make it necessary to append an 's' there". And as you heard this morning, O'Connors decided to leave the following as it is:
What I published yesterday:
O'Connors never own that fund, it is not O'Connors' to say, and it is not O"Connors' to validate, and it is not O'Connors' to confront regarding anything about that fund.
This is the same to all my inheritances.
O'Connors' never own that fund, their family wealth confusion is not the reason to demand any paying checks or providing from that fund, and no one should use O'Connors' family wealth confusion to demand any paying checks or providing through O'Connors' family wealth confusion. This is the same to all my inheritances.
----Published on Nov. 16th, 2017
----Nov. 17th, 2017
Heard this morning's frustration about why I am not willing to give her my money knowing she is his wife.
My response: I am a female resident of Massachusetts, U.S and I am an heir of a long history polygamists' family, but I am not a gay or a lesbian and I am not interested in her. That is not to mention a polygamist never share a marriage partner.
It is her beloved and devoted husband that she should ask everything she deserved, she should never ask anything desirable to herself from a female she publicly shitted as "unwanted, disgusted to her husband".
Any request from herself that is to request me to shit herself all over freely in all possible ways, which has to be my shared understanding of "shit herself all over freely", will be my pleasure to cooperate. This is the only request that I am willing to hear from her.
*Massachusetts of United States is the first state in the whole world has lawfully same-sex marriage.
----Nov. 17th, 2017
Heard this morning's arguments, about above points I expressed, from those wives who are certain I have nothing to do with their wives.
My response: That is my frustrated curiosity why it is their business to be so agitated about some romance issues of some man else? Why it is their business to participate in this fight for an underwear of some man else? Even this or that person is associated with these wives, but that person is not supposed to be a man to these wives for them to fight for that person's underwear.
And that did spark a lot of rumors of who they are to this or that man on romance. And that did cause me express my anger loudly "Who the XXXX do you think you are?"
----Nov. 17th, 2017
11-16-2017 Proud to be My Father's Daughter carry My Father's Blood
Heard this morning's arguments about confusion why I still say that is my money.
My response: That is my money because I inherited it and because it is validated according to U.S. laws that my inheriting on June 30th of 2004 is legally valid.
I am a U.S. citizen since June of 2015. All my inherited were entrusted before the People's Republic of China was born in 1949.
It is not People's Republic of China's saying or confrontation of anything regarding my inheritances.
It is not People's Republic of China's current administration's saying or confrontation of anything regarding my inheritances.
O'Connors never own that fund, it is not O'Connors' to say, and it is not O"Connors' to validate, and it is not O'Connors' to confront regarding anything about that fund.
This is the same to all my inheritances.
O'Connors' never own that fund, their family wealth confusion is not the reason to demand any paying checks or providing from that fund, and no one should use O'Connors' family wealth confusion to demand any paying checks or providing through O'Connors' family wealth confusion. This is the same to all my inheritances.
----Nov. 16th, 2017
Heard the saying why I have problems with Chinese Chairman Xi's announced family plan.
My response: I do not care a bit how he is going to have his family.
I am not willing to provide for his family or whoever he wants to share his life with. I refused to be threatened to provide for his family or whoever he wants to share his life with, and I refused to be shit all over because I refused to provide for his family or whoever he wants to share his life with.
*Rumored, according to Chinese Chairman Xi's announced family plan on the radio program, Chinese Premier's wife (Cheng, Hong 程虹) who is also the mother of Chinese Chairman Xi's only child (an adult son) is the person that Chinese Chairman Xi intends to share his life with.
*Both Chinese Chairman Xi and Chinese Premier have very high income and privileges in the People's Republic of China, both are￥100,000/month.
* Rumored the same female they both devoted to love also have been devotedly loved by several other Chinese senior government officials who also have very high incomes and privileges in the People's Republic of China. Rumored it is verified she has mothered 4 adult children from them, one each. Rumored this administration is the administration that "should be blessed by her fertility capability". Rumored she has two more adult children have not been verified fathered by whom yet.
*Rumored 程虹(Cheng, Hong) was graduated from a foreign language college (University) and had been a faculty of the same college (University).
----Nov. 16th, 2017
Heard the confrontation of Scientists from Chinese Science Academy.
My response: That has been my screams towards Chinese diplomats who are graduated from foreign language colleges (universities) or a foreign language majored in some colleges (universities). Those Chinese diplomats have insisted on to judge the level of my Computer Science knowledge by their foreign language knowledge.
This morning, as you heard on the radio, these Scientists from Chinese Science Academy who majored in Astrophysics (天体物理) or Geophysics (地球物理). This is my father's major and Chinese Science Academy had been the place my father had worked for over 30 years till he retired.
I assume the points from China, as you heard this morning, is to say that these people know for sure my father never had any professional achievements at all to express that this is how this administration of Chinese government know that it is impossible I can have any achievements in Computer Science just being his daughter.
I assumed my father is not feeling great at this hour. Heard he is also a U.S. citizen now. Heard this is not the first time. My father was enrolled in surveying and mapping school of the Chinese People's Liberation Army (原中国人民解放军测绘学校, currently named PLA Academy of Surveying and Mapping. 现中国人民解放军测绘学院）when he was enlisted in 1950. I heard somebody from this current Academy made a similar comment last year in the same radio program.
My father got his bachelor's degree in Astrophysics majored from Nanjing University(南京大学数天系） where he enrolled after he was no longer enlisted.
I do not know how huge they are without any borrowing some intellectual properties efforts.
* Rumored they are the people knew if I have an adult child by birth. I say U.S. law enforcement can do a verification check on U.S. satellite's records to see if it is possible I could hide 10-months-pregnancy when I was a college student lived in an 8-person dorm or when I was having a full-time job.
* Rumored they are the people knew if my father has a pre-marriage daughter who is mothered by one of them. I say U.S. law enforcement can do a verification check on U.S. satellite's records to see if it was possible a female could be seeded without any physical contacts in People's Republic of China before 1967. I was born in 1967.
----Nov. 16th, 2017
11-15-2017 I own my claimed wealth lawfully is Validated （“我和中国政府的矛盾”附后）
Heard this morning's validation if my inheriting on June 30th of 2004 is legally valid.
My response: Big Thanks to the United States Supreme Court Judge who validated my inheriting on June 30th of 2004 is legally valid. Yes. Yes. Yes. Big Thanks.
----Nov. 15th, 2017
Heard the same U.S. Supreme Court Judge said he is not the person to say if I can own it all.
My response: Yes, of course. I own it all is by my grandfathers' wills.
----Nov. 15th, 2017
Heard the saying to vote to spend my money.
My response: That is from imaginable frustration. By U.S. laws, my wealth is my private wealth which is not eligible for this "vote to spend".
----Nov. 15th, 2017
Heard the saying of concerns if applicable investor taxes can be appropriately paid.
My response: Please inform IRS about why you are concerned. I informed law enforcement about my concerns how my investor taxes are paid.
----Nov. 15th, 2017
Heard the saying of concerns regarding if my providing checks can be lawfully valid to be cashed.
My response: Those checks are paid lawfully per those funds' known legal owner's request or known legal owner's lawful representative's requests. Regarding if I can be the beneficiaries of those paying checks, please inform the law enforcement about all your concerns instead of any accounting departments that receiving these checks. Those paying checks are all lawfully signed valid checks.
You will be sued if you insist on harassing any accounting departments to block me to be provided for by those lawfully signed and legally valid paying checks.
You will be sued for criminal activities if you insist on harassing any accounting departments to block my financial providing from those lawfully signed and legally valid paying checks because of your sexual activities or because your sexual intentions have nothing to do with me.
----Nov. 15th, 2017
The difference between Validating, Ruling and Voting.
My response: Validating is to verify some information according to the laws.
The ruling is to give a Judge's decision on the case the Judge is handling.
Voting is to make a decision on a matter as a group.
This morning, as you heard on the radio, the information about if my inheriting on June 30th of 2004 is valid has been validated by a Supreme Court Judge according to U.S. laws to be legally valid.
My inheriting on June 30th of 2004 was never a case in any U.S. court.
My inheriting on June 30th of 2004 was never a U.S. Supreme Court case as you heard on the radio.
----Nov. 15th, 2017
Heard saying why according U.S.laws when I was a People's Republic of China's citizen in 2004.
My response: I heard the explanation has given as my inheriting on June 30th of 2004 happened on U.S. soil.
I have been a U.S. resident since October of 1996. On June 30th of 2004, I inherited my wealth in a law office in Connecticut, United States.
I became a U.S. citizen since June of 2015.
----Nov. 15th, 2017
11-14-2017 All About DNA test
Heard this morning's talk about DNA test result resemblance of 97%, 99% and etc.
My response: DNA resemblance is like following, same if do a mother side DNA test.
Father and son (daughter) > 99%
Siblings from same both parents > 98%
Half Siblings >97%
Father's siblings (from same both parents) and son(daughter) > 97%
Father's half-siblings and son(daughter) > 96%
Grandfather and grandson (granddaughter) > 98%
Grandfather's siblings (from same both parents) and grandson(granddaughter) > 96%
Grandfather's half-siblings and grandson(granddaughter) > 95%
First cousin > 96%
Second cousin > 95%
Third cousin > 94%
...
Heard this morning said the girl of the published video in 2012 is DNA test resemblance > 99% with me. That is my biological daughter who resembles my appearance. I am after my ancient grandfather and ancient beauty grandmother in appearance, I do not really resemble my parents or my younger brother in appearance, and I do not resemble any of my cousins in appearance.
----Nov 14th, 2017
Heard the girl lives with a "British Nanny" is DNA test resemblance > 97% with me. This is a puzzle.
My response: Heard the girl lives with a "British Nanny" is DNA test > 99% resemble of her birth mother.
Heard her birth mother is, at least, a couple of years younger than me (born in 1967), my grandfather past away in 1965 who certainly was not the person fathered her birth mother.
Heard her birth mother's DNA test result shows, that her birth mother is not my half-sibling or first cousin. This means her birth mother is not my father's or my father's siblings' child.
Her DNA test result is a puzzle. Her rumored resemblance to me is not nature resemblance.
----Nov 14th, 2017
11-13-2017 New Treatment Technology to Completely Cure Cancer --Proudly being the first person suggested How to Completely Cure Cancers
Heard this morning's talk about new Cancer Treatment.
My response: This is the technology that uses laser power to 100% completely Cure Cancer, not some 5 years survival rate that needs to be collected through this treatment program promotion, but the rate of Complete Cured Cancers.
As broadcast by the radio program this morning, Eligibility for a cancer patient to participate depends on an oncologist's diagnose, no matter what the stage is but what the type of cancer is, and special Abbreviation of the treatment technology.
I had published this special Abbreviation on my school Blackboard this semester and last semester, with the surgery rate that is so impressively affordable (not covered by insurance). I am currently enrolled in an MBA program offered by a west coast University.
No matter what current cancer stage is or locations are, be original or spread, the patient can be cured 100% completely.
----Nov. 13th, 2017
The difference between new treatment technology and chemo.
My Response: Following are the reasons a special Abbreviation code is needed to enroll in this treatment.
----Nov. 13th, 2017
The difference between an Oncologist, a cancer researcher, a bio-medical engineer and me.
My response:
An Oncologist is a medical doctor (diagnose), a surgical doctor (scalpel surgery or this new technology surgery), or a radiant doctor (chemo or this new technology surgery) who can diagnose if a patient has cancer and what type of cancer, can remove cancer from patient through scalpel surgery or chemosurgery or this new technology surgery, and can help cancer patient to recover.
A Cancer Researcher is a researcher specialized on how to target cancer infected cells accurately to be used by Hemodialysis ( Adsorbing Carbon rod blood filtering technology).
A biomedical engineer is an engineer to design and to develop those medical diagnostic or treatment equipment and devices, such as artificial internal organs, replacements for body parts, and those machines for diagnosing medical problems or for providing medical treatments.
I am the person having a Master degree in Computer Science and a Bachelor degree in Pharmacology major that came with education on Basic Medical System.
I contributed to this new Cancer treatment technology by I am being the first person suggested using Hemodialysis ( Adsorbing Carbon rod blood filtering technology) for several times to prevent spreading. It is from my Basic Medical System knowledge.
I also contributed to this new Cancer treatment technology on how to improve research-oriented laser treatment technology (instruments and devices ) to clinic-usage treatment technology. It is from my Computer Science knowledge.
----Nov. 13th, 2017
11-12-2017 A Scheme? -- Root cause of "Pay for whoever's sexual activities"
Heard this morning's broadcasting about "no association with.."
My response: I did accuse them of something.
I accused them why they arranged to make me pay for someone's sexual activities that they said it was to settle a remarried family. This has been everybody's frustration, at least this has been what I feel like, why I have been refusing to provide for whoever's marriage-related sexual activities, and it has been my serious complains why I need to pay for whoever's sexual activities for almost 3 years.
Heard that their arrangements were the starters of this "pay for whoever's marriage-related sexual activities" as you heard on the radio this morning, at least one of which was out of the judgment prompted by the phone call they received from the "NYC Duane Reade pharmacist Lizzette" as you heard on the radio in the morning.
----Nov 12th, 2017
11-11-2017 Controversial intentionally caused by Sexual Harassment from The Big Names' Associated
Heard this morning's a woman's claim that she is sharing a man.
My response: That is not a man can be associated with me for that female to make such a claim on my radio program.
I am financially much wealthier, that is no comparison wealthier, than the male or the male's family that is claimed, I have much glory family name and family history to share with my children, I have no such need to be associated with any female's shared penis. This is a disgusting illusion to fancy a male can be shared just because he is unwanted.
My children have no obligation or responsibility to be associated with the male that was claimed a shared one, whoever the male is. I refuse to let this female or the male she claimed to have any association with my children.
----Nov. 11th, 2017
Heard this morning's some O'Connors efforts of confusing who do or do not share.
My response: Do not know if those O'Connors are decent O'Connor named.
Because of all these efforts to confuse who deserve to own a penis, or who deserves to be the better production of the penis. Plus the efforts of writing "legal documentation" to own my biological children for demanding money and providing purpose, I say:
Nowadays, O'Connor name only means shit, disgusting and"Who the FUCK they think they are".
Not sure if this morning's effort is to ensure I can get stuck in these lies after all these insults, or it is the effort to decent O'Connor's name a bit, at least, not a sick, pathetic psycho's synonym.
*Luckily, I am a pharmacologist can do a DNA test by my own hands.
----Nov. 11th, 2017
11-10-2017 This morning's August Born Child is a Sneak-In Illegitimate Cheap Born
Heard about this morning's August born Child.
My response: This sneak-in illegitimate child is from a relative to an investor of Macy's. I did not know a daughter from that house can be this cheap. I am just being honest about what I heard and how I feel.
Like I made myself very clear if this is indeed from the person I do mind very much, I have no problem to tell that I also heard his birth mother already divorced, and his father already has a younger child. And I have no problem to say if it is his father is that Senior being arrested, I have no problem since I have no obligation, no responsibility and no need to mention that person at all. And I have no problem to be happy the person that I minded very much actually ended up with a sneak-in child and possibly no-inheritable but a shit like his birth mother.
Some say this is so insulting, I say "Great after all they have done to support all these insults to me. I will let my children know everything that happened made them shit-like to the public who know them, by factual evidence. And I am determined to return all these insults back to everyone that laws can't apply justice appropriately, and I have no problem to return these insults forever till I feel I have made myself feel justified".
By the way, I probably sued them "Murder for Money" already if all these are true stories. I figured that either daughters from this family are this cheap need to sneak-in a child to have some money or it is their Murder Attempt to kill me for my money.
----Nov, 10th, 2017
About Macy's Investor.
My response: I was treated nicely and respectfully in that broadcasted Macy's Thanksgiving parade when my parents were in New York City with me in 2000.
Heard Macy's is from the same investment of Lehman Brother's that I am currently provided for, a 400 years' old or so French Fund.
Boston downtown crossing location Macy's store's recent renovation that removed its Bathrooms and its kitchenware department sparked a lot of sayings.
Almost everyone in Boston, MA knows that I like to visit its kitchenware department and use its bathroom if I am in Boston Downtown area.
If there are no such stories on the radio, I would defend that is irrelevant because I already seldom go there since March of this year. But with this story of August born child, I am being very honest about what happened and what I heard.
----Nov. 10th, 2017
About Lehman Brother's Investor's family.
My response: Heard the investor has daughters who already married in 2004 and still in same marriages.
Heard their marriage have some situations because of 2004's meeting which has nothing to do with romance nature that I may need to do my sincere apology.
----Nov. 10th, 2017
Heard Chinese government is working on to have a saying over the ownership of this French Fund.
My response: This fund has been out of China at least for 400 years already. This 400 is over 5 times age of 68 years' old of People's Republic of China. It is Chinese culture to tell them "Shut the fuck up, who the Fuck do you think you are. You must be the whore-born that don't have parents to provide family education to teach you to shut the fuck up." This is totally 100% according to Chinese culture that only whore-borns don't learn shut-up from parents.
By the way, this French Fund has a parent fund as well, the same as the fund cause O'Connors confusion has a British Fund.
----Nov. 10th, 2017
A post I published somewhere regarding this "I came from China, I know".
My response: Not meant to insult anyone, but I have to let everyone to understand my frustration and curiosity a bit regarding this "I am a Chinese" knowledge of my private wealth. Can you ask your Chinese colleague or your Chinese friend why being Chinese from the People's Republic of China can be so authority on my achievements during my 20 years in U.S. time, and how a People's Republic of China's citizen can be so authority on American Fund's ownership? My family had to entrust all family wealth abroad before China became Communism country in 1949 that Communism certainly means seize all private wealth. Why is it so hard to understand for everyone having a Chinese passport? Everyone having or had a Chinese Passport knows that's what happened to everyone's private wealth in the 1950s in the People's Republic of China. What knowledge can a Chinese passport grant on if I have my private wealth inherited outside China?
* Only my grandfather may have entrusted every penny abroad. My great-grandfather, one of the donors who supported Chinese colleges, passed away in 1930 that he may not have expected China could be a communist country.
----Nov. 10th, 2017
Chronicle Note
**I have not heard one single episode of this radio program myself for a lot of reasons. To do a radio program majorly featuring me was discussed on 07/01/2004 conference call. The radio program has been produced by United States 106.7FM or Clear Channel and on air since 2005??suppose??. I am a Chinese, the major featured person(suppose). Following are what I gathered from impacts of being the major featured person and may not correct. Please contact me at somebodyinMA@gmail.com if the content is seriously incorrect and please provide references including broadcasting channel and time, thanks forward.
12-31-2017 My lawfully owned private wealth and My name in People's Republic of China (关于我合法拥有的财产以及我方敏在中华人民共和国的名誉）
Heard this morning's talk about being a Mistress.
My response: Exactly, Why would a wealthy Miss P ever need to fight for the acknowledgment of a "true birth mother" of another wealthier person's child without a marriage through a radio program producers' help? Why would a Military breed need to hide a marriage with another enlisted from the possible ex? That is if she is a wealthy Miss P and a Military breed.
That is the reason I said who need her to hide her marriage? And why anyone would assume the wife, the possible ex, did not know anything at all?
The money she claimed she born into is the money I born into by the laws, that is the reason I inherited it in 2004 and I am the person kept calling laws' help when she kept on insisting to request other people's favor to have some money transferred to her.
Exactly, if the Fund in "her disputes only" is the money she born into, why would she need to request people outside of the fund to do her some favors to have some money transferred to her? Why can't she call laws' help like I did?
I was called into an attorney's office without a clue about money and effectively inherited my trusts my birth grandfathers set up for me before I was even born, I could effectively spend money by saying "I want this" and decide my providing as I wish over the phone in an attorney's office in Connecticut, and I am complaining to the laws where is my money currently after she "requested some favors" successfully. All because it is my money.
Heard this morning's talk about what is wrong with her having her own money.
My response: It would be wrong if that money she called her own money is actually my own money. If that is my money by Laws, I refuse to enjoy this female sexually and I refuse to let this female to fancy my own money can be called her own money. I insist on calling that is my own money.
----published on Dec. 29th, 2017
Argument about Jessica Petroves(Pejoves) money (Second item)
----Dec. 31st, 2017
听说了今天早上的广播提到了海外华裔社区的很多传言。
我的回应：我也是认为是真是假都应该让中国人民共和国国内的中国公民们听到然后再予以核实，否则实在是太吓人了。
今天早上提到的一些传言我也有听说，但没在此博客公布。我确实是唐太宗李世民的继承人，但我已经是美国公民了，不适合就中国内政畅言，或因为过度关心而引发一些“企图利用唐太宗李世民继承人身份干涉中国政府或者中国内政”的指控。
就美国公民阿尔贝特·高尔及其华人妻子（或者孩子妈）通过广播剧制作声明进行针对我方敏个人的羞辱谩骂及财产掠夺，我已求助美国警方，一切按照美国法律已在处理当中。
就传言阿尔贝特·高尔的妻子（或者孩子妈）以中国政府名义针对我方敏的私人合法利益及私人合法权益所做声明全部是无效的假声明，我已求助美国警方，一切按照美国法律已在处理当中。
就传言阿尔贝特·高尔的华人妻子（或者孩子妈）以中国政府名义宣布一些中国政府的决定，包括通过广播剧宣布的不准我方敏入境中华人民共和国就因中国国家领导人有的是女人奶子屁股，在中国政府没有任何否认即予以全部默认的情况下，我方敏认为一切都是中华人民共和国政府的正式声明。我方敏保留一切追究以中华人民共和国政府名义破坏我方敏名誉的行为的法律责任，只要中华人民共和国有一天能够恢复法治国家信誉， 只要中华人民共和国的政府有一天恢复中国政府是一个领导13亿人口的国家职能机关而非一些个别人的私家妓院的理解，我方敏一定寻求在中华人民共和国司法保障下的，在中华人民共和国960万平方公里领土领海和领空，中国政府海外各领事和中国政府各驻外机构，以及中国政府在公共海域及公共空域的机构和设施，全面恢复我唐太宗李世民继承人方敏的名誉。
我重复我今天早上所言， 我不清楚阿尔贝特·高尔的华人妻子（或者孩子妈）是否已是美国公民，但我已是美国公民，就中华人民共和国政府是否是在美国公民阿尔贝特·高尔或其华人妻子（或者孩子妈）的实际领导之下，我方敏没有任何看法也没有任何想法。
*已经听说中国各入境港口已在当天接到广播剧制作团队中方国内广播电台宣传团队人员的最高指示，所有中华人民共和国的边防军警人员必须执行广播剧制作团队里中国广播电台的中方工作人员所下达的不准方敏入境的命令。
----2017年12月31日。
12-30-2017 Is radio company's CEO the person who understand this "I am his real woman to deserve that unwanted woman's money"
Heard this morning's talk about how my computer technology achievement was evaluated by a radio CEO.
My response: This is the typical PRC80 style. Throwing a universal comment in a tone that is authoritative which certainly promoted commenter a superior role in judging the matter to audience group who are not aware what is going on.
I heard it was the CEO of IheartRadio made that comment to say that I am impossible can have computer technology achievement by stating in an assertive tone:" I say ....". But the problem is he can't be assertive with any reasonable grounds on matters if I have computer technology achievement or if I have my own inherited wealth from my own birth grandfathers.
His insider knowledge of who is truly David Petraeus' wife is not the the knowledge of anything about who the Chinese woman Min Fang in Boston is, which includes authentication knowledge about my trusts I inherited from my birth grandfathers or the authentication evaluation of my own intelligence as well as my education, just because all of these have nothing to do with David Petraeus or his relatives or his marriage status. It is rumored that announced child is the child registered in David Petraeus' family business' capital accounts registry as announced on the radio program.
I did hear some rumors that his split with his ex-wife may be the reason how he thinks about my wealth's deservedness. The problem is I was never married to all these so deserved males but announced as never wanted by every one of them which is unlike whatever his own experience might be.
Regarding the question that has been used as the reason to rob Min Fang's money "If I have a child with that Chinese woman Min Fang, will I be able to have some money", the answer is absolutely NOT. Becuase Chinese woman Min Fang made it very clearly in 2004 that during entrust time, only Min Fang's biological own born children (each of them) can have Min Fang's money as inheritable or provided for by Min Fang's money. Min Fang is famous for not willing to let anyone just seed some children to take the money and throw the children out, and Min Fang is famous for very well protected on this matter that no one can take Min Fang's money without violating laws to commit some crimes.
And it is rumored that his wife's cousin, the famous rape-alike victim of a rumored F families-gathering-sex, actually mothers a child from a Mr. P. who wants to own my inheritance Fund from my own birth grandfather (my third year's providing fund) may be another reason.
Also it is rumored that Albert Gore illegal appended his name next to the second biggest investor of the radio company in computer registry system internally at the time when the radio company was renamed to reflect this "I heart radio" desire*, so hidden that this record can only be seen by a computer person or only be seen with a computer person's help.
My first year's providing officially started from Christmas of 2014. Of course, I had been provided for to cover some of my expenses before Christmas of 2014.
Also, about that my father's fake first born Beijing woman. It is rumored that my father was in Beijing on a business trip a week before she was conceived in 1965 or so is the reason for the argument that "she may be born a week after due-date". But according to the satellite-image records, my father did not even visit her mother nor visit her mother's office at all during that entire business trip.
*It is rumored the appended name was not authorized by the valid legal documentation of lawful ownership of the registered investment share. I did tip the law enforcement's about similar rumors over a year ago.
Reference on PRC80 style.
2-29-2017 What is PRC80 Style and Background of P.R.China in the 1980s
----Dec. 30th, 2017
12-29-2017 "True Beggar" is the PRC80 Scheme Style and background of P.R.China in the 1980s (中文附后）
Heard this morning's "body and life (including every penny and all benefits) with the wife, but soul.."
My response: Who needs that invisible, and untouchable big huge SOUL that resides in the body and represented by the life (including every penny and all benefits) to afloat somewhere else? Definitely not my any place. I reject this announced idea completely.
It only sounds creepy considering the female, who owns the announcer's body and life, has been minded so hugely about any association. The announcer must have been infected from the hard-earned PSYCHO titled female.
I heard that this whole week's featured episodes reflected a lot of people's frustration for the past 10 years "Are they (featured patrons) Alzheimer patients?" And my frustration has been: "That is a hard-earned psycho title". The theme should be called:"Do you hear what I hear? Alzheimer or psycho?"
the PRC80 Scheme practicing on Smartphone invention money (first and third item)
----Dec. 29th, 2017
Heard this morning's talk about what is wrong with her having her own money.
My response: It would be wrong if that money she called her own money is actually my own money. If that is my money by Laws, I refuse to enjoy this female sexually and I refuse to let this female to fancy my own money can be called her own money. I insist on calling that is my own money.
Argument about Jessica Petroves(Pejoves) money (Second item)
----Dec. 29th, 2017
Heard this morning broadcasted "I would rather advise you to call yourself a true beggar".
My response: This is the advice I gave according to PRC80 Scheme style that was out of being so annoyed with the non-stop harassment that "she is the one have The Money". I was like "why took my money and tried to paint me a beggar?"
This is obviously to shit somebody. Some PRC80 Scheme style advises are not this obvious. Example: Everyone is curious if I have money under entrust, why do I choose to be homeless? I said I didn't choose but advised, and I did call law enforcement's help to find out who advised me. I heard recently that it was advised by a Chinese male, I heard he was featured a possible heir from Zu's family on the radio program this year. His last name is also Fang(方) but he has no blood association with me at all.
That advise he gave sounds malicious who knew what this advise means, but not a bit to someone like me who know nothing about what it would be like to be a "homeless". It was sound like an adventure to me.
The key is if you know what the advise means. For example, if the advice of "just amputate the entire leg" is given when one is complaining about own leg pain, the one being advised certainly know immediately that is malicious. But if the same effect advises is given as "just stop local blood circulation completely to lower the sensitivity of the nerves", it may be taken without any guards.
This is the PRC80 Scheme advise style. Most of the time, this kind advises are given to promote advisers to make some gains, sometimes, this kind advises are given purely just out of hatred.
----Dec. 29th, 2017
Background of the 1980s in the People's Republic of China
1980s time in the People's Republic of China was like a no-law country with a lot of issues. Due to the national economic system conversion from the planned economy to the market economy, the main economic system was spinning out workers without any possible chances for those been spanned out to find a way to survive (no pension, no social security and not a chance to find a job*).
A lot of people were, possibly, desperately trying to find some resources to support their families. Some took advantage of the government's policies of encouraging private business. And in this process, tons of people being taken advantages of without knowing what happened which may include college professors or Science Academy Scientists' inventions or patents, etc. 1989 student movement may be the outbreak of a lot of tensions but somehow missed the points.
* In the 1980s, there were not many foreign investments yet. Healthy business (factory or company) were selected to be kept in the main economic system, the less or no profiting ones were spanned out, either to be independent or up for sale. So if a worker was laid off, it was because the factory or company could not afford to pay the salary (wage), and those businesses in the main system only recruit newly graduated from junior high schools, high schools or colleges. So, for the laid-off workers, it means no retirement pension from the factory or the company that laid this worker off, no social security from the government and not a chance to find a job, the laid-off worker could invest some money to become a street vendor or could buy a for-sale factory (company), or this laid-off worker would just have no place to turn to have any income.
* I graduated from high school in 1985 and graduated from a 5-years' pharmacology major from a medical college in 1990. I came to the United States in October 1996. I was the person reported to the then Chinese central government in early 1989 that 1989 Student movement against some government officials' corruption was suspicious because there was no reported major corruption case at all in 1988-1989 that could cause such outbreak. I was the person participated 1989's government meeting and gave my advises as an in-college Communist Youth Party member student to the government that led by Chinese Communism Party which shaped government's handling of 1989 student movement.
* I was the person pointed out in that 1989 meeting, organized by the Chinese government, that students' marching and blocking the streets activities would drag some healthy business into less profiting situation that may further worsen already pretty bad economic situation and cause more workers to be laid-off into financial desperation. And I was the person reported that collection of the donations from the streets were suspicious.
----Dec. 29th, 2017
八十年代的中华人民共和国背景介绍：
八十年代的中华人民共和国就像是一个无法无制的国家有着很多的问题。当时是国家的主要经济体制是在由计划经济在向市场经济的转型阶段，国家的主要经济体制当时是在逐步释放一些经济效益不太的企事业单位的职工，但没有考量到下岗人员的再就业选择，造成下岗人员基本上就没有任何实质上的身存之道（没有退休金，没有社保金，更没有机会再去找一份工作）。
当时很多人估计真是拼了命的想办法找点钱来养家糊口，还有些一些人或是响应了或是利用了中国政府当时鼓励“让一些人先富裕起来“的政策。在这个过程当中，有很多的人是被某名其妙的占了便宜（甚至有可能是被无偿掠夺了），中间有可能包括一些大学教授或是中科院科研人员的研究发明及专利，等等。1989年的学生运动可能是由于这些矛盾所产生的愤怒爆发，但1989年的学生运动所表达的愤怒没有切题，而且离题很远。
* 在八十年代，当时没有什么台资或外资或合资企业。效益好的企业（工厂或者公司）都被政府选择留在了中国当时的主要经济体制内，效益不好的企业或者亏损的企业被选择为独立核算，自负盈亏企业，或者被标价出售，属中国的主要体制外企事业单位。所以当时如果一个职工下岗的话，那是因为企业无钱支付这个职工的工资，而中国的主要经济体制内企业当时只招收应届或者前一年毕业的初高中及大学毕业生。所以，对于被下岗的职工来说，这就意味着没有退休金，没有政府保障的社保金，更是没有任何机会可以再找一份工作。这个下岗人员当时是可以投资做个个体户，或者买下一家标价出售的工厂公司，或者就是没有任何地方可以求助有一份养家的收入。
* 我是1985年高中毕业后于1990年自五年制的医学院药理专业毕业。我是1996年10月移居美国。是我1989年向当时的中国政府举报1989年反贪污反腐败学生运动很可疑。在1988年-1989年期间根本就没有任何重大贪污腐败案件的报道会引发如此大规模的愤怒表达。是我在1989年参加当时中国政府组织的全国高校会议并在会上以在读共青团员大学生的身份向中国共产党领导下的中国政府提出了一些处理89年学运的建议。 这些建议被中国政府参考并据此产生了1989年中国政府对当时学生运动的处理办法。
*是我在1989年中国政府组织的高校会议上指出学生游行阻街行为会造成一些效益好的企业也变成效益不好企业，进一步恶化当时已经很糟糕的经济环境从而造成更多的职工下岗而陷入家庭经济绝境。是我在会议上汇报说街上收集的捐款下落可疑。
----2017年12月29日。
12-28-2017 Who is "the United States Government" and the PRC80 Scheme practicing on Smartphone invention money
Heard yesterday and today that messages both impressively were from the United States government.
My response: I heard about it yesterday late in the day, so I explain it here today.
Yesterday's reason was Albert Gore, he very politely addressed himself "was a Vice President of the United States for a reason", but his current "decision" that I don't deserve to be acknowledged as part of smartphone creator group is still the "decision from the United States government". Otherwise, this is purely U.S. intellectual properties related laws matter, not the United States' national matter that needs the United States government decision.
This morning's "government decision" is from treasure department conversation that some Chinese government representatives conclusion of the discussion became "the United States government decision". This recording technique was helped by the David Petraeus' family name. This family name has been the name of a lot of this type "helping hands" on radio program producing and beyond.
It was announced by a Mr. Lewis from Treasury Department that I do not qualify for disability which is a true statement. In 2004's meeting, I did say I may qualify to apply taxpayers' money of disability help. Thanks to my great psychologist, I won't be qualified to apply for taxpayers' help on disability.
There was some confusion if that conversation means I need to be disabled to be provided for by my own money, my clarification on that is certainly untrue. I own my own money is the reason I am already qualified to be provided by it. And by the legal documentation attached to the providing that is appended to the regular donation, there certainly has no such conditions that I have to be a "psycho" to be qualified for providing.
I did provide some references related to my inheritance together with my social security assistance application to the Social Security Administration.
----Dec. 28th, 2017
Heard this morning's argument about Jessica Petroves'(Pejoves?) money.
My response: She is the announced mother of David Petraeus' child.
The money in this morning's disputes was never owned by this Jessica Petroves'(Pejoves?) birth mother or this Jessica Petroves (Pejoves?) birth mother's family.
The money in this morning's disputes was never owned by this Jessica Petroves'(Pejoves?) birth father or this Jessica Petroves (Pejoves?) birth father's family.
If this Jessica Petroves(Pejove?) has a birth father who is(was) not this Jessica Petroves (Pejoves?) birth mother's lawful husband, the money in this morning's disputes was never owned by this Jessica Petroves'(Pejoves?) birth mother's lawful husband or this Jessica Petroves (Pejoves?) birth mother's lawful husband's family.
The money in this morning's disputes was never owned by this Jessica Petroves'(Pejoves?) at the time this Jessica Petroves(Pejoves?) was born.
The money in this morning's disputes was never owned by this David Petraeus' family or any of his relatives.
The money in this morning's disputes is my providing money lawfully provided for my exclusive usage.
----Dec. 28th, 2017
How a law professional Albert Gore can be the Computer Science professional-evaluation eligible?
My response: Just because he declared himself "was a Vice President that led the United States for a reason".
By rumor, Albert Gore has fathered a Chinese diplomat's child and married her in P.R.China recently (registry marriage). That Chinese diplomat is the Chinese wife that Albert Gore announced he is married to on the radio program.
And if you ask around in Chinese Mainland Community, what he did is a typical and famous 1980s Chinese Iron-Steel business style: squeeze himself into the smartphone contributing group by crediting his contribution of pointing out I am being the fake one in order to take some money from Smartphones' business contributing shares.
The illustration of typical 1980s Chinese Iron-Steel business style is: whenever and wherever and whoever, as long as there is a conversation talking about a possible money-making business, a complete irrelevant person would seek chance to be in the conversation either by throwing a universal applicable commenting line to "contribute" or to exclude someone already in the conversation group. This is to ensure to have a good reason to have some money share and to reduce possible sharing parties.
Now, trying to remember what was broadcasted yesterday, and analyze the points that Albert Gore pointed out: I am a commenting party that is a fake contributor. He knew this was because he was a Vice President that led the United States for a reason.
I was the person initiated the conversation of smartphones by alerting everyone that there were some new inventions of mini-computer hardware from Intel company. And the conversation continued on how to use these new inventions to make a cellphone a smartphone. I am the original in-conversation group that Albert Gore trying to exclude, and I already accused him took my share of smartphone invention fee deposited into his own possession or gave out as he wished since 2007 or so.
Almost every one of my intellectual income, I earned it by initiating the conversation of having the business and also earned it by contributing on how to make it a good business.
Now, trying to remember what the Taiwanese woman, Wang, Xuehong*(王雪红), said yesterday about her contribution in there: She was an MBA graduated, and her husband is electronic engineering professional that knew cellphone chips. It was a smartphone invention that was discussed, not some computer software programming, it is impossible that I can contribute anything in there. It is obviously the same technique.
And if you heard she, by rumors, was the famous person known for "deserved to be in any smartphone conversation with a camcorder to record everyone's discussion", you knew this is the same the People's Republic of China Iron-Steel business style: "I already heard your information, I do not need your any contribution." which implies you are ousted from any possible profiting from what has been recorded. Her father was known for having some investments in the People's Republic of China since 1980 or so.
*Not certain if the name is correct. The father is Wang, Yongqing(王永庆），I am not certain which daughter.
----Dec. 28th, 2017
12-27-2017 Why entertainment professionals deserve to evaluate non-entertainment achievement on this radio program?
Heard this morning's Taiwanese woman's comment on how could I possibly have intellectual income from smartphones.
My response: A lot of people were there with her knew she was the one never contributed a bit but accused by me of attempting to steal the intellectual contributions from everyone else. Being a non-computer or non-electronics professional-background person, how she can possibly evaluate if I contributed into the discussion when Bill Gate (DOS system Inventor), Paul Ellen (Window system Inventor), and Steve Jobs(Mac system Inventor) were the ones in that same discussion on June 30th, 2004.
Please check following related blog article:
why the People's Republic of China's government insist on I am a fake (Second and Fourth Items in the post)
I have this huge problem with this radio program's producing efforts. They are the group can relate a creator's role in movie making, but how they can be eligible to evaluate if anyone is a creator's role in other industries?
Please check following related blog article:
Second Item: Heard about confusion how intellectual contributions can be appropriately acknowledged and rewarded.
----Dec. 27th, 2017
Heard this morning's broadcasting of a private hearing that happened in 2006 or 2007.
My response: It has been understood worldwide including my own that Albert Gore, David Petraeus and British Prince William are the ones that have huge problems with me, and plus that announced mothers of each of all three's young children want my money to be called their own money.
Kate Middleton announced in 2015 or in 2016 time that my inheritance Fund, the British East India Company Financier Fund, should be called hers to own. I refused.
Jessica Petroves (Pejoves?), announced mother of David Petraeus' child, announced in 2017 time that she deserves my another inheritance Fund which a Ford Holding's investor Fund. I refused.
A Chinese former or current diplomat who mothers an Albert Gore's younger child announced tons of owner deservedness in People's Republic of China government's name and/or in her own name, plus tons of ownerships announced by Albert Gore himself. I refused all.
"What will happen if a wife or a Mistress is not getting along with a Dowager or an heiress? It is understood as the husband or the gentleman lover who is the person that does not get along with the Dowager or the heiress. So it is the same as a Dowager or an heiress does not get along with the husband or the gentleman."
----Published on Dec. 26th, 2017
----Dec. 27th, 2017
How my inheritance Fund, the British East India Company Financier Fund, can be announced as Kate Middleton's wedding gift?
My response: By rumor, it was announced by Kate Middleton's romantically involved ex-boyfriend Albert Gore. But the Fund was never owned by Albert Gore. So it was just the illegal and invalid announcement.
What happened was a producer or two invited Albert Gore to the radio program's recording studio and provided him the radio program's microphone to announce such announcement. It was never from anyone that my trust related or the British East India Company Financier Fund's management related. It was purely an announcement made by Kate Middleton's romantically involved ex-boyfriend Albert Gore for her then-upcoming public wedding with some of the radio program's producers' help. And I refuse to consider to make it real.
The British East India Company Financier Fund was never a no-owner fund even with a mandatory law in 1900 time that said any trust over 500 years without a known owner should be a no-owner Fund, because the British East India Company Financier Fund has been famously owned by a French parent Fund entire time since the British East India Company Financier Fund has been set up. And this French fund is owned by another Fund in another country since the French Fund has been set up.
Petroves or Pejoves family's story related Fund is the same that it has been famously owned by another French Fund the entire time since that British Fund has been set up. And the French Fund is owned by another Fund in another country since the French Fund has been set up.
Tons of radio program's announcements have been announced in such invalid way. Rumored Boston's Magic 106.7FM radio station's female manager was announced by a Jessica Lopez this same way that actually effectively ousted radio station's then in-office male CEO and promoted the female a CEO in 2014 time.
Since 2014, it has been rumored that this radio program has been argued why its featured stories have to be real stories. And it is well-known I have not been to Britain yet, not to mention seduce a British Prince as featured on the radio program. I know how much shits threw at me by "no need to be really my stories", but I do not know how many "radio program's announcements to gain ownership" have to be effective since this radio program went on-air in 2005.
I refuse to acknowledge any of all those radio program's never-authorized-announcements that is related to who I am or what I own or what I have achieved. I did call law enforcement's help on those announcements that have been illegally transacted.
https://chroniclenote.blogspot.com/2017/12/12-19-2017.html
----Dec. 27th, 2017
About my daily providing that announced this morning "No American should support my living cost".
My response: I am not supposed to be supported by anyone but myself.
Rumored Jessica Lopez, a resident New Haven of Connecticut is the person has some huge sayings over my housing and my cash or food providing by being so influential to Boston Housing Authority and Boston Transition Department. The husband she announced on the radio has nothing to do with me, and the real reason of her power is because she is the person "radio program announcement promoted" Boston's Magic 106.7FM radio station's female manager.
Currently, those providing whereabouts from my trusts are still being "investigated". I only received housing arrangement paid for years from my first year's providing, no food or cash received yet. Rumored, my second year's transferred to Tina O'Connor and my third year's transferred to Jessica Petroves(Pejoves) by a Hispanic Treasure Department employee who never heard of any stories about these two famous British Royals most wanted British Funds. Both transferred after radio program's announcement of "Chinese woman does not deserve any O'Connor money or any Petroves(Pejoves) money."
I am currently having Food stamps and some SSI help other than housing. Food Stamps I received is because of "poverty" and SSI I received is because I have been really "agitated".
*My second year's providing American Fund is owned by the same French Fund that owns the British East India Company Financier Fund, never O'Connors' money.\
*My third year's providing American fund is owned by a French Fund that also owns the other famous British Royals most wanted Fund, never Pejoves' or Petroves' money.
*My fourth year's providing American Fund, currently has not paid out my living expense yet, is owned by a French Fund that never owned by David Petraeus' family nor any of his relatives.
----Dec. 27th, 2017
12-26-2017 Pants-off prostituting group is not the authenticating power of my matter
Heard this morning's confusion who is eligible to have a saying over what.
My response: What else would one expect when saying over another person's business, other than "I told you I refuse to fxxx you..." from another person. It is purely another person business, not this or that person to say at all unless...
----Dec. 26th, 2017
Heard the confusion of exactly what is a Dowager.
My response:
A dowager is not just a widow, but a widow has a noble title and handsome financial arrangement from the late husband that is not very shabby compare to her own born heir of her husband's share. A Dowager is privileged because of her senior age, her noble title and her influence in her late husband's house including her other children's households.
What would happen if a widow is not willing to tolerate a Dowager or an heiress? Well, the same if a gentleman is not willing to tolerate another gentleman, let's say how well resourceful a widow does mean a lot in this kind of situation. It is the same when a Dowager is not getting along with an heiress. It is the same when a Dowager or an heiress does not get along with a gentleman.
What will happen if a wife or a Mistress is not getting along with a Dowager or an heiress? It is understood as the husband or the gentleman lover who is the person that does not get along with the Dowager or the heiress. So it is the same as a Dowager or an heiress does not get along with the husband or the gentleman.
The "not getting along situation" between a Dowager or an heiress, or a gentleman is understood as between the head of different houses.
What is the difference between an heiress with a noble title and an heiress without a noble title? Purely just how resourceful an heiress can be.
----Dec. 26th, 2017
Heard this morning's presentation of the frustration over my biological children.
My response: This is ridiculous that all these "pants-off for money" groups can be supported on the public channel to insult everyone who is never one of them, who is never their business and never intend to fxxx them.
I am never such a cheap a person that needs to have some money through child-bearing that is resulted from pants-off to demand money desire. My children are well-known through pregnancy mothers.
I am the heiress, the well-known Asian owner of the British East India company Financier, who also owns its almost $400 Billion American brother Fund that I call O'Connor's family wealth confusion. I am never the person in need of financial security through pants-off.
Who the fxxx are those prostitutes-borns to say if I am allowed to have a child or children authentic enough as if their pants-off only knowledge can be the authentication power? How many they have fxxx-ed that can make them so knowledgeable about everybody's underwear matter is none of my business, I refuse to fxxx any of them. My matter is none of their business because I refuse to fxxx them no matter how whorely & prostituting experienced they are.
----Dec. 26th, 2017
Heard this morning's noise is the confusion of "get money from pants-off experience" and "get inheritance as the result of parents' mating experience."
My response: "Get money from pants-off experience" is sexual activities between money giver and money recipient that emphasized on providing sexual coitus experience in exchange for getting money provided.
Having inheritance means there is no sexual activity at all between the money giver and money recipient. The money recipient is the mating result of the money giver's parenting efforts.
Who does not know the difference between a child's relationship with birth parents' mating experiences and sexual partners sexual intercourse relationship?
----Dec. 26th, 2017
12-25-2017 Merry Christmas
To the well-known my own biological children:
Merry Christmas!
You are well-known my own biological children the same as well-known "An Asian Owner" in British East India Company Financier's story. Your mother is never the person that needs you to have some financial security. Do not listen to any nonsense if you are good enough to your mother or your father, and tell those who doubt your mother's unlady-like behavior that mother is an heiress from a 2000-years-long polygamist family. That is that.
*The "An Asian Owner" is well-known to entire Britain and entire France for over one or two centuries. A lot of people from India aware of these "An Asian Owner" stories too.
To my own children's grandparents and their father:
Merry Christmas!
Merry Christmas!
To everyone I owe my big thanks for their love and caring towards my biological children:
Merry Christmas!
To my own father:
Merry Christmas!
老爸爸：圣诞节快乐。查一下你的每月现金是否有收到。我收到的是$735 加上$30. 你现在的生活是由我负担的， 一切都是依照2004年7月1日我信托财产时所决定的， 着重健康及基本生活保障。支出是由我的信托支付，目前已支付的几个信托都不是方智仁爷爷设的信托，更不是其他人的支出。所以你的生活是由你女儿我负担的。如果妈妈还在，她的待遇和你是一样的。😀😀
还有，如果有人问如果中国有继承税，我继承财产是否欠中国税收，你就说不欠。
我已查询，如果我是一个法国公民（或英国公民）在美国领土上以美国康州居民身份继承财产（英国法国是有继承财产的税收的），我是不用缴纳针对财产征收的遗产税（因为爷爷们都是在1949年10月1日解放以前就已办理境外信托，即将财产信托在中国领土以外地区，爷爷们也都不是法国公民或英国公民或美国公民）， 我也不用缴纳针对我个人的继承税（因为我是在法国或英国境外的美国领土上继承的财产，不用向法国或英国缴纳任何继承说，而美国康州在2004年6月30日这一天孙子女继承祖父母财产是100%免继承税的）。所以，就算中华人民共和国有继承财产相关的税收，我都没欠中华人民共和国任何应交税款。
还有，你所念的南京大学和我所念的上一医都是由爷爷们（方智仁的爷爷，方智仁的父亲和方智仁）捐的。
女儿
----Dec. 25th, 2017
12-24-2017 The difference between A Mistress, A Dowager and An Heiress
Heard this morning's question of "why she can't be a Mistress".
My response: The tone and the question normally would be expected from a special group of people called dowagers. A dowager is a dignified senior female who has a title or properties derived from her late husband.(https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/dowager).
The tone would be more haughty if a senior female has both a title and properties from the late husband, but normally won't address to a same-kind who won't tolerate a bit but respond fiercely by all means. A same-kind normally does have a lot of means to respond fiercely, right?
The following is my example response which is a very common one that can be responded immediately and publicly right to the faces of those who dare to ask this question and as my return of those "bathroom" radio program promotions organized by the couple. A very mild response indeed.
This question "why can't she be a Mistress" is definitely ridiculous from a Mistress only female with the seeder of her child still alive, and address to a well-known polygamist heiress. This haughty question, rumored, is from a Jessica P, the announced mother of James Rockefeller's child (David Petraeus' child). No wonder the saying is "His profession is in uniform which should stand for no-education already." And I add here that I can tolerate that person this much for the sake that his child does not have any title can inherit from him. A title does imply some class of taste, including the taste of choosing who can seed to produce an heir, right?
To those "bathroom" promotions that organized just to tell everyone that I am a female David Petraeus never intended to fuck with, I really have to say I do not know how this David Petraeus addressed his own birthmother to differentiate the category?
----Dec. 24th, 2017
What is the difference between a Mistress, a Dowager and an Heiress?
My response:
The tone would be more haughty if a senior female has both a title and properties from the late husband, but normally won't address to a same-kind who won't tolerate a bit but respond fiercely by all means. A same-kind normally does have a lot of means to respond fiercely, right?
The following is my example response which is a very common one that can be responded immediately and publicly right to the faces of those who dare to ask this question and as my return of those "bathroom" radio program promotions organized by the couple. A very mild response indeed.
This question "why can't she be a Mistress" is definitely ridiculous from a Mistress only female with the seeder of her child still alive, and address to a well-known polygamist heiress. This haughty question, rumored, is from a Jessica P, the announced mother of James Rockefeller's child (David Petraeus' child). No wonder the saying is "His profession is in uniform which should stand for no-education already." And I add here that I can tolerate that person this much for the sake that his child does not have any title can inherit from him. A title does imply some class of taste, including the taste of choosing who can seed to produce an heir, right?
To those "bathroom" promotions that organized just to tell everyone that I am a female David Petraeus never intended to fuck with, I really have to say I do not know how this David Petraeus addressed his own birthmother to differentiate the category?
What is the difference between a Mistress, a Dowager and an Heiress?
My response:
An heiress is a female who has who has inherited a title or properties from her birth family, not necessarily from the birth parents if the properties or title is from birth grandparent directly, but has to be the heiress of the birth parent from the side she inherited her title or properties from.
If a dowager is also an heiress of her own maiden family, the dowager has the saying of her owns plus what she got from her late husband.
A dowager is the head of her late husband's household but has no saying of her own-born inherited heir son, and her own-born inherited heir son has no saying of her, the same. An heiress is the head of her own house that having sayings of all her own-born blood together with the entire house.
If a dowager is also an heiress of her own maiden family, the dowager has the saying of her owns plus what she got from her late husband.
A dowager is the head of her late husband's household but has no saying of her own-born inherited heir son, and her own-born inherited heir son has no saying of her, the same. An heiress is the head of her own house that having sayings of all her own-born blood together with the entire house.
I am the heir(heiress) of my own birthfather according to my family's ancient birthmark heir rule, but my inherited wealth and my titles are from my birth grandfathers directly.
I often address myself an heir to my grandfathers because I was brought up as a boy. I am an heiress of an almost 2000-years-long history polygamist family that has the male polygamist's privilege in my romance.
I was never a Mistress to anyone who I had dated, I did not even have some wild dating experiences. I just dated those prominent in a polygamist heir's style but as a girl. That is all.
My inherited titles are for my own heir is a true statement, but being me who is a Queen of what I own, I can create titles to entitle all my biological children upon their birth is also a true statement. That is a Queen do, right? I am blessed that I have tons of titles I had inherited to eligible me to create titles to hierarchy from.
*My grandfathers entrusted wealth together with some titles that created especially for me being an heiress. So, my birth lawful father does not have any title but I inherited a lot together with my trusts that set up by my grandfathers. I have over 10 grandfathers had been Emperors but I do not know how many titles I inherited. As the heir of this generation, I inherited all my family's titles plus some "entrusted" titles.
East Han Dynasty, 3-4 Emperors were my grandfathers.
Tang Dynasty, over 11 Emperors were my grandfathers, and one ruling Empress was my grandmother.
Southern Tang Dynasty, 3 Emperors were my grandfathers.
----Dec. 24th, 2017
Heard radio program's shit throwing is just some challenge that is all about "being a provided for or being a desire to be provided for should be the ruler of the provider or a potential provider".
My response: I refuse to hire anyone to rule me or govern me. I refuse anything this sort of.
Who should be the ruler of other people's private wealth or of another wealthy person is none of my business unless that has impacts on my own biological children's interests.
The supporting evidence of the challenge is "Government officials are paid by tax-payers to govern (rule) taxpayers", Royals are supported by tax-payers to be the Royals, etc. What is wrong to be the person that been provided for to rule the provider?
I am a tax-payer of the United States, I say I understand that the United States Government officials are paid by the United States' taxpayers to govern common interests of all U.S. citizens to ensure every U.S. citizen to have the lawful rights that granted by U.S. Constitution can be effectively same equal in front of U.S. laws and effectively protected by laws. What else?
---- Dec. 24th, 2017
I often address myself an heir to my grandfathers because I was brought up as a boy. I am an heiress of an almost 2000-years-long history polygamist family that has the male polygamist's privilege in my romance.
I was never a Mistress to anyone who I had dated, I did not even have some wild dating experiences. I just dated those prominent in a polygamist heir's style but as a girl. That is all.
My inherited titles are for my own heir is a true statement, but being me who is a Queen of what I own, I can create titles to entitle all my biological children upon their birth is also a true statement. That is a Queen do, right? I am blessed that I have tons of titles I had inherited to eligible me to create titles to hierarchy from.
*My grandfathers entrusted wealth together with some titles that created especially for me being an heiress. So, my birth lawful father does not have any title but I inherited a lot together with my trusts that set up by my grandfathers. I have over 10 grandfathers had been Emperors but I do not know how many titles I inherited. As the heir of this generation, I inherited all my family's titles plus some "entrusted" titles.
East Han Dynasty, 3-4 Emperors were my grandfathers.
Tang Dynasty, over 11 Emperors were my grandfathers, and one ruling Empress was my grandmother.
Southern Tang Dynasty, 3 Emperors were my grandfathers.
----Dec. 24th, 2017
Heard radio program's shit throwing is just some challenge that is all about "being a provided for or being a desire to be provided for should be the ruler of the provider or a potential provider".
My response: I refuse to hire anyone to rule me or govern me. I refuse anything this sort of.
Who should be the ruler of other people's private wealth or of another wealthy person is none of my business unless that has impacts on my own biological children's interests.
The supporting evidence of the challenge is "Government officials are paid by tax-payers to govern (rule) taxpayers", Royals are supported by tax-payers to be the Royals, etc. What is wrong to be the person that been provided for to rule the provider?
I am a tax-payer of the United States, I say I understand that the United States Government officials are paid by the United States' taxpayers to govern common interests of all U.S. citizens to ensure every U.S. citizen to have the lawful rights that granted by U.S. Constitution can be effectively same equal in front of U.S. laws and effectively protected by laws. What else?
---- Dec. 24th, 2017
12-23-2017 How the ownership can be "effectively changed" just by announcing an ownership on the radio?
Heard this morning's talk about who owns this radio company and this radio program it investing.
My response: Great to hear Board of Directors take the ownership back from the "announced to own claimer", is this enough to let public aware Board of Directors are the authoritative voice over radio company's management matter including this radio program it investing?
It has been horrible as if this radio company has no management at all just because its ownership was announced by whoever wants to own a radio company has access to this radio company's public channel microphone. How those joking-like announcements of radio company's ownership in June of 2007 could actually become "effective" in radio company's business operation like what had happened?
This entire time it has been my complaints why Albert Gore has the final saying of how radio program should produce about my stories? or if I have achievements, etc. ? Albert Gore got nothing to do with me and he is not the computer person or graduated from a medical school to evaluate if I have any achievements, why him? Oh, now I knew it was all because of that joke in June of 2007 that made him the voice of radio company's business decision, how about me related? How he became the authoritative voice about my anything?
All I heard yesterday about this was there was or were female voices have been used to mimic my voice, and I did write an email to law enforcement because I did not know what has been said to the public audience in my voice. If you have been pissed off about what "I" commented or "I" opinioned through this radio program or some other places, please contact law enforcement if the impact has been immense, or send me an email that was listed right below this blog's title about your complaints. There was an 1800 number that was published on May 16 of 2017, it was paid by the account that managing my $3Billion major featured person fee. I heard because of the disputes of those featured mimic voices deserve to share this $3Billion of major featured person fee between 2005 to Dec. 31st of 2012. (they already deposit this radio company paid-out $3Billion into their own bank accounts and currently in disputes), the phone receiver is uncertain. I refuse to let those unwanted and completely illegal activities to abuse my voice right and to share my major featured person fee.
* My understanding, even if out of the consideration that I do have my handsome inherited wealth that it should be alright to let somebody mimic my voice to make some money through their own mimicking talents, they should announce themselves instead of abuse my voice right. And it won't be entire $3Billion that much.
*如果中国政府有听说我在2007年前后通过广播剧或者其他媒体说中国政府是一个无政府组织，请向美国司法机关查询。我从未发表类似言论，我是从2015年一月开始因私人财产被凭奶子屁股无理强行索求还不给不行，才开始痛骂中国政府根本是个敲诈勒索犯罪团伙外加卖淫集团被取名为中国政府，我今天已经就广播剧使用声音演员以模仿我的声音通过广播剧发表一些言论报警美国联邦调查局。
----Dec. 23rd, 2017
12-22-2017 Strategy of Desperation and Strategy of Buy-Out-Everyone
Heard this morning's proud announcement of victory to own the entire 5 times more.
My response: Heard that is apparently announced as proud of victory win by the strategy of taking of pants in front of the husband's uncle and the husband's uncle's colleague. Is it possibly really broadcasted as such a proud on the public radio?
I thought she has been very proud she married to the money, why this desperation strategy is needed? Why I have a complaint about this? Because the similar demand is rumored about my already pre-paid medical expenses. She just can't bear that medical expense was paid by a check printed as "Company (Investor)". Even with an investor clearly printed next to the company name, that check has to be destroyed, otherwise whatever left that has not been used in there has to be her money.
To destroy a check that was already cashed in October of 2017 or to own the money knowing that was never her husband's or her husband's any relatives' money? What kind of desperation is this? I have tons of similar complaints about this female that I have constantly called this female a psycho, I heard she publicly complained about this PSYCHO title she earned so hard on a lot of public media, so should I call her something else such as "fake rich but real beggar"?
*The check was paid from the company's investor's(Investor Fund) capital accounts (also called owner's account or each shareholder's account). That Investor Fund is my inheritance. Her husband or her husband's relatives' similar checks would be printed as "Company (Firstname Lastname)". My capital accounts that with my name on them are in my trusts.
----Dec. 22nd, 2017
If I am asked why she can be so desperate?
My response: That is never my curiosity.
But I assumed that has something to do with the saying that her husband's father does have a younger child. All these being victoried of "owned already" as well as myself may be the party that had supported the Mr. Senior's wife to have a child through pregnancy mother after almost over 50 years of marriage.
I was talking about me possibly having a pregnancy-unfriendly womb and was having some anxiety health situation, I was in my late 30s and I may need to wait for another 10 years to consider helped nature pregnancy. And when I was talking about being a mother through pregnancy mother with the help of very common medical technology IVF (In-vitro Fertilization), it interested a lot of females who have not been a mother for a lot of reasons. One of them is the Mrs. Senior.
I felt bad for Mrs. Senior not being a mother after almost 50 years marriage. You can say I was easy about that person's inheritable because I inherited my own grandfathers' handsome blessing the day before, that is if I am considered a "fake female in interest". Or you can say I just didn't care the impacts to that person's inheritable at all by just being an outsider. Either way, I just did not think it was inappropriate to say Mrs. Senior can have a child through pregnancy mother in her 70s. I was not set up the Mr. Senior with a 20s to intentionally impact that person's inheritable. It was Mr. Senior's wife after almost 50 years marriage.
The female who I often called a psycho may beyond boundary felt uncomfortable about the impacts of her announced child's inheritable. Regarding this, I announce here I do not care a bit. I won't tolerate her taking my money as if I owe her. I never owe her a bit. I take legal action every time if she tries. I called law enforcement's help regarding my $3Billion radio company's income.
I repeat what I said in the morning, "David Petraeus has made his own announcements loudly and quiet out his harshness through promotions in reality, but he has thrown shits at me even louder and promoted those shits 100 times fold louder in my reality life as well as quite out any efforts of reporting that I have my own very handsome wealth. That is the reason I sue them both for severe sexual harassments."
*When that person's marriage was announced in June of 2007 on the radio program, I was in a health situation that I did not even remember I had met that person. I have no need to demand financial providing from that person or his related because I have been well provided for since Christmas of 2014 and there is no confusion that I never demanded anything before Christmas of 2014.
----Dec. 22nd. 2017
Heard the rumor of the saying that his grandfather can kill my great-grandfather, he can kill me.
My response: By rumored, this is a 3rd or a 4th cousin to me or my great-grandfather and once worked for the couple mentioned above.
By rumor, the confidence came from the same repeated strategy: Buy all the way through. I was like "Oh, no wonder this time this family need The Money to participate, otherwise not enough money to buy everyone".
By rumor, the strategy repeated to be used on my great-grandfather and my grandfather.
My great-grandfather and my great-great-grandfather were known for supported almost entire Chinese College Education system in early 1900 time.
I heard my great-grandfather was an over-night sudden death caused by poisoned food in 1930. And the money my great-grandfather entrusted was claimed owned by a cousin of my great-grandfather's and some of it was donated to both the Chinese National Party and the Chinese Communist Party after his death. It was in 1930 when the Chinese Communist party was in need of money time.
My grandfather passed away by natural death in 1965, the People's Republic of China was just after 3 years of hardship or three years famine time which may be the reason that money could achieve a lot to have the confidence of buy-way-out is a strategy.
----Dec. 22nd, 2017
12-21-2017 A public microphone can only report A Lawful Ownership
Heard this morning's talk about David Petraeus decision on me.
My response: David Petraeus had announced he has nothing to do with me at all on this same radio program and elsewhere.
I repeat what I said in the morning: David Petraeus decision does not represent my decision or my opinion unless authorized.
What I own is never his to decide. Who I am is never his to decide. I am the owner of British East Indian Company Financier Fund by inheriting according to its centuries well-known entrusting "An Asian" person's will. I am the cash provider for Lehman Brother's Subprime Mortgage loans.
My wealth has nothing to do with David Petraeus or his family wealth or his relatives' family wealth. My current financial providing has nothing to do with David Petraeus or his family wealth or his relatives' family wealth.
12-20-2017 British East India Company Financier Fund
I heard there was a media interview broadcasted yesterday that his beloved females declared I do not even have a resume which is certainly an untrue statement. The following link is for anyone who has received education to check out if that expression is out of human reproduction-function-only organ to insult the fact that a human does have a brain for any non-sexual related resume. I am sick of his beloved females' shits out of their sexual activities. They have been one of the major reasons for all these shits threw at me on the radio.
Archive Section of My Web Blog-- My Proud Achievements
----Dec. 21st, 2017
Heard this morning's arguments about who should own this radio program.
My response: I am the creator and major featured person of the radio program, and I am the investor to both radio company and radio program. I own above shares lawfully.
I heard Chinese government's representative had announced on the radio program some "announced ownership of this radio program" is the reason for this morning's arguments. I announce here that those "announced ownership on the radio" has nothing to do with me and has nothing to do with my lawful ownership shares. I did call law enforcement's help on tons of these similar "announced ownership" through producing an entertainment company's microphone that intended to own my lawful wealth.
My lawful shares are represented by radio company IHeartMedia's Board of Directors. My investment in this radio program and IHeartMedia is through an American Fund which is a brother Fund to British East India Company's Financier Fund.
I heard IHeartMedia's Board of Directors has no saying over this radio program producing or anything about IHeartMedia is because it was announced that Albert Gore is "the real biggest announced owner of IHeartMedia" by his (Albert Gore's) own joking tone announcement on the radio program before 2010 time. I heard this same person also announced himself is "the real president of the United States" in the same joking tone earlier this year.
I heard since then anything this Albert Gore decided has been announced as United States government's decision. I did call law enforcement's help on announcement's I accused as "public kill attempted". Those announcements that I heard rumored everywhere are " the United States' government decided the Chinese woman in Boston won't get any appropriate medical treatment", " or "the United States' government decided that law enforcement won't investigate on anything that the Chinese woman in Boston had called possible crimes", as well as some clear instructions on how to remotely harm or kill the Chinese woman in Boston through some technology. I am the "Chinese woman in Boston" that public audience understood.
I am protected by the United States' Government under President Trump's leadership.
I am protected by the United States' Military under President Trump's leadership.
I am protected by the United States' law enforcement that under President Trump's leadership.
*IHeartMedia is the former Clear Channel Media.
*The American Fund mentioned above is the O's family wealth confusion.
----Dec. 21st, 2017
12-20-2017 British East India Company Financier Fund
Heard this morning's broadcasting sworn protection of lawful interests.
My response: I heard the issues are caused by what an immigration country the United States is.
For my own experiences, almost everybody but in very limited numbered countries like Britain, France and India know that the British East India company financier Fund has been historically known entrusted by an Asian.
And tons of similar confused stories of never heard of from worldwide immigrants.
----Dec. 20th, 2017
Heard the question why nobody doubted if it possible I am eligible to be the mother of the British Crown Prince's children.
My response: Maybe everybody had heard from their British friends, or French friends, or Indian friends that the British East India Company Financier Fund would be the reason for the British Crown Prince to consider.
And I was willing because only a British Crown Prince (junior) who also carry my blood can claim this fund to be owned by the British Royals from him on.
I was heartbroken when I heard the British Crown Prince chose not to have such a child which left me tons of greatest opportunities to wear the most pretty possible every time I need to introduce I am the owner of the British East India Company financier fund, as well as the reason that the British Royals feel OK in unison not to own the British East India Company financier fund from the next generation on.
I am OK that there is no such child and there are no such children to remind me that I am unwanted. And I feel relieved that I do not need to struggle if I should make my own heir cry for at least one title I inherited.
----Dec. 20th, 2017
Some updates on CEOs being dragged out stories.
My response: One dragged-out American Fund's CEO has been pissed off since the day, and I heard the reason was he insisted on its parent Fund's CEO to contact his home phone number, and the parent British fund's CEO insisted on him went back to the office to pick up the phone there. The Big question from British was "Why can't he just get up and go back into the building from a rear entrance?"
The mystery that caused some misunderstanding in this dragged-out story was the American Fund's CEO never heard of such treat till experienced it while the British parent fund's CEOs have already well familiar with these treats for a couple of hundred years. The historical stories are if the CEO was butts-on-the-ground threw out, the CEO would just get up and find a door that could re-enter the building, or just moved the entire company to another building if the British Royals ordered the CEO not allowed to come back to the building.
----Dec. 20th, 2017
12-19-2017
Heard this morning's talk about who has not enjoy whom or who did check out tatoo.
My response: All are none of my business.
The only one that may be my business is I need to dress pretty the most was laughed out histerically by the interpretation of "rather be a mother-fucker". I heard those are Chinese females who never heard of British East India Company financier fund's historic stories.
It is none of my business other than to say I heard the reason of the laugh did clarify this morning he never enjoyed the mother image in the laugh.
----Dec. 19th, 2017
My clarification on my participation in radio program producing:
I have not heard any broadcast episodes of this radio program I have been complaining since it on-air in 2005.
I have not yet in studio-participating the producing of this radio program since its pilot time.
I do not know what has been announced on this radio program since 2005 other than some rumors concerning my own lawful interests, and I did call laws' help on a lot of things that concern my lawful interest.
I refuse my own lawful rights to be stepped on in the name of producing this radio program or promoting this radio program.
I refuse my own lawful interests to be stepped on in the name of producing this radio program or promoting this radio program.
I refuse my own financial belonging be given out by announcing gifting on a public media without my own wish.
I did call law enforcement's help to get back every penny I own that has been given out illegally by the radio program's producing team together with its local promotion teams.
I did call my own attorneys to check why and how there have been so many outside saying-over power on my lawful interests that have been created by some producers of this radio program's announce-to-own efforts.
----Dec. 19th, 2017
12-18-2017 Horrifying to know this Announced-to-own scheme has been since 2006 or 2007
Heard this morning's talk about why O'Connors are so supported to announce-to-own.
My response: Exactly.
The Fund caused O'Connors' confusion is the brother Fund to British East India Company's Financier and both owned by a French Fund.
Since Queen Victoria time in 1800, British Royals efforts to own this Fund have made so many British know that Fund was not any O'Connor'ss family wealth, and so many French know that Fund was never any O'Connor's wealth.
The other one of my inheritance Fund that caused a Jessica Pejoves'(Petroves?) severe confusion is similar to this fund, so many British know this was never Pejoves'(Petroves?) family wealth, and so many French know that Fund was never any Pejoves'(Petroves?) wealth.
Heard the big names are either sharing O'Connors' confusion or sharing this Jessica Pejoves' (Petroves?) confusion by marriage, rumored 4 Miss Pejoves (Petroves?) (2 twins from the same Pejoves (Petroves?) mother) and 4 MissO'Connors (from the same mother) married to the big names from the same great grandfather's line (fathered by or mothered by).
Since 2015, Worldwide people knew British Crown Prince chose not to wish to have this British East Indian Company Financier Fund by publicly addressed he never had anything to do with its U.S. citizen Chinese Owner.
There is no such child and no such children that shared between any British Prince with British East India Company's financier fund's U.S. citizen Chinese Owner.
I am truly impressed by the Lawful Country the UK has been since the Queen Victoria time. And I am aware I have to dress the most pretty possible whenever I need to introduce myself as U.S. citizen Chinese owner of the British East India Company Financier.
----Dec. 18th, 2017
I was asked why I have to make it so public like this?
My response: Not my preference. I have no choice but to make this whole story public.
Since 2015, so many people have verified this Fund is the brother Fund to British East India Company's Financier Fund. And today, some O'Connors still insist on to claim on the public channel radio to own this Fund, and they took every penny of the money I was lawfully provided by this fund for my exclusive usage to cover my daily living. I have been shitted a beggar and have been living in poverty because of this radio program's promotions. I have no choice but to make this whole story public.
It was constantly announced on the radio that O'Connors deserve to own this Fund, and some O'Connors insist on making phone calls to the Fund to demand money per their request just to prove O'Connors truly own this Fund, and insist on to at least to own over 100 Billion of this Fund, by rumor, because this is a over $300 Billion Fund and I published $200 Billion on my web blog. They claim this has to be owned by them because they announced it on the radio already.
I refuse to let my lawfully owned inheritance Fund to be illegally announced-to-owned just by some public channel radio program's announcement.
What they cannot own if they can own this Fund just by holding on to a public channel microphone?
As far as I heard of, rumored Albert Gore announced himself to be the biggest investor of this radio company before 2010 which caused Board of Director has no saying over who should be the CEO.
Heard rumored currently, Board of Directors support current CEO but public denounced the same CEO on the radio by saying he has been ousted about 2-3 months ago. And I heard he is still the CEO currently.
SInce 2007, rumored Albert Gore announced the first time that one of intellectual income to be called his own money to give out or to keep as he wishes and every penny of all my intellectual income since then. All these money has been transferred to announced patron's bank account as announced on the radio. I called law enforcement help on this. I accused Albert Gore committed public robbery or public theft.
Beyond my money, I knew I have to address that my Ingonyama title that I lawfully inherited from another birth grandfather of mine cannot be owned by just announced want-to-own on the radio. And I refuse to let anyone own my own titles including this Ingonyama title.
Beyond my money and my titles, I heard some other private employment promotion(s), public post(s), etc. have been announced, and I am not certain if those were announcements only or announced to be promoted etc.
Beyond my money and my titles, my own achievements have all been denied to be mine because some people do not know why those have to be my achievements, even though by hard evidence those are my achievements. And almost all my achievements have been announced-to-own on this radio program by whoever desire to have some achievements.
I did call laws' help on my own matters that I am certain of.
----Dec. 18th, 2017
12-17-2017 Why my exclusive usage lawful cash providing can be "disagreed" by whoever?
Heard this morning's talk about my cash providing.
My response: I feel I can finally breathe now. Thanks very much.
It will be my exclusive providing, no split. I heard 2 confusing number of the cash amount that was broadcast this morning so I will let my attorneys know what is the number when I receive.
I also hear complaints of "too much" for the big number, I say that are ridiculous complaints. That is the amount I am lawfully provided for my exclusive usage and that's that. It is none of anyone else's business how much I should use or can use. These complaints are from those who want money just by being money-wanters. I refuse to provide for them. Who the Fxxx they think they are. It was never their money for them to have such complaints.
My inherited wealth is either my trusts set up by my own birth grandfathers or my own birth grandfather's wealth I inherited. It was never a shared family wealth. My trusts are owned by me ever since the day those trusts were set up for me. My own birth grandfather's wealth (方智仁）was owned by my own birth grandfather(方智仁) before my inheriting, and was never owned by anyone else after my birth grandfather's own inheriting in 1930 or so. I inherited my own birth grandfather's（方智仁）wealth according to my own birth grandfather's will in 2004.
----Dec. 17th, 2017
Heard this morning's confusing number was supported by big names.
My response: That has been my anger the entire time. My inherited wealth has nothing to do with their names no matter how huge their names are. Why they can have this illusion I will let them have this saying power over my money? They are the ones telling everybody I have nothing to do with them, why they have this illusion that they can have this saying power over my money just by having nothing to do with me? I know a lot of people already said they want to let me have some of their own money by creating opportunities for me to file lawsuits against them. I just do not understand since they knew I never demanded a penny of their money, why would they willing to let me have some so voluntarily? The experience is the big names seemed just won't stop till see you in courts.
I am not complaining that the radio program does some reporting to reflect some issues, but reporting should never mean saying over power, right?
Like the other day, New Jersey Senator O'Connor stated on the radio program, I heard, that my inheritance fund (the O'Connors confused one) is not their family wealth. Well, some big names insist on to broadcast a People's Republic of China's citizen's announcement "but that fund is" immediately after it. Which Fund? Why this American Fund's lawful ownership is a People's Republic of China's citizen's to "correct"? This almost 400 years old American fund that causes O'Connors' confusion was confused by a 200-years-ago's letter, and this entire time that Fund has a British parent Fund, and a French grandparent Fund, and another great grandparent Fund that registered in a country has no records of any O'Connor ancestors. Why some big names, by rumors, insist on to let a People's Republic of China's citizen have this opportunity to make everyone doubts who should own the money, what is the purpose?
I have to express myself that I do not know if the rumors can be true, and I am not willing to participate any efforts to send big names to courts for financial gain, but I will sue big names if my own lawful interests and my own lawful rights have been impacted by their rumored efforts.
12-10-2017 My Capital accounts are in my Trusts, not in the State of Massachusetts
12-12-2017 Heard this morning's confusion from P. R. China how that is my Fund.
----Dec. 17th, 2017
Heard some big names still confused if I spend their money by saying I want this or that publicly in front of them.
My response: How could I possibly spend their money just by saying publicly that I want this or that when they were presented at the same meeting? At least one of their own (David Petraeus) never felt humiliated when yelling "Not going to pay" publicly when they were presented as well as everybody else in the same meeting whenever I said I want this or that.
And there were people answered publicly in front of them that they would cover my spending whenever I said I want this or that every time cause David Petraeus' angry yelling "Not going to pay". One of those who claimed to cover my spending is the person I have called my own accountant.
Why would any of other big names feel any humiliation to say "not going to pay" when they were approached privately after the meeting?
12-16-2017 I refuse what I own to be announced given out and I refuse to be harassed by none of my business rumors
----Dec. 17th, 2017
12-16-2017 I refuse what I own to be announced given out and I refuse to be harassed by none of my business rumors
Heard this morning's talk about Lehman Brothers' investment.
My response: I refuse to give anything related to Lehman Brothers' investment to anyone, as a gift or not as a gift at all.
Heard this morning confirmed that I have spent total $45 Billion in cash from my allowances to help Lehman Brothers' cash reserves. I wish Mr. R-s and Mrs. R-s could know this is the reason they had been approached to ask if they would be willing to financially support those "what I said" on July 1st of 2004.
I wish Mr. R-s and Mrs. R-s could understand I never intended to spend their money and I never spent their money is a true statement.
----Dec. 16th, 2017
Heard some scary rumors about Dwarfs and Inmans.
My response: I am a resident of Boston, Massachusetts. Dwarf and Inman are just two geographic locations in Boston, MA.
Inman Square is located near Central Square, I heard it has a lot of law school students' residents near-by.
The dwarf is located near Boston Aquarium area, I do not know who Dwarfs possibly are.
----Dec. 16th, 2017
Heard rumors about I am being a bad luck to a wedding because I am known for no-wedding.
My response: Heard it is so severe that I should not even be allowed to be near to any place that having a wedding going on. This is through some malicious harassment promotions.
The truth is I only have children from marriage, as I decided on July 1st of 2004.
I was never a person in need of a child or children for financial providing or titles & privileges reasons. I was never that cheap could have my children to be called illegitimate children.
----Dec. 16th, 2017
Heard this morning's broadcasting of a Chinese who is or isn't a real one.
My response: Either case is none of my business.
If any Chinese could remember there was a published article in Chinese magazine World Journals Weekends about the war in Afghanistan and about deployed U.S. military there. That article was published before 2010, and I remembered it mentioned a newly wedded wife of the most senior U.S. Military commander in Afghanistan.
If anyone insists on saying I am a stuck-on to that commander, I have to call that person a psycho because that is just ridiculous while knowing I had been in no contact with that commander for any reason at all since July of 2004. I did call the person who has minded it very much beyond boundary a psycho and I did call laws' help on possible severe sexual harassment case through this radio program and through the promotions of this radio program.
----Dec. 16th, 2017
Heard this morning's talk about I said I would give David Petraeus money.
My response: It was on July 1st of 2004. That conversation was about how I would share my wealth with my possible biological children. David Petraeus made it very clear he has his own excellent family wealth and his child would not need any of my money, that was even if he shares a child with me. Later he asked me if I would be willing to give his child who also carry my blood some of my own money if he changes his mind about this, I said of course. And he asked me to promise that I won't change my mind about this. And I did promise it.
He did change his mind about this totally by having his biological child with another person as he already publicly announced. And I did not change my mind a bit about how I only willing to give my own money to my own biological children.
I won't give any of my own money to any of David Petraeus' associated romance or non-romance relationships. I refuse to give a penny to any of his real or rumored romances, in the past, at present, or in the future.
David Petraeus publicly announced he has nothing to do with me.
I announce here that any of his romance, rumors or real ones, is none of my business.
The end.
----Dec. 16th, 2017
12-15-2017
Heard this morning's broadcasting about un-controllable chuckles.
My response: I heard the feeling felt was cold at the moment.
I heard in most of the cases that chuckle was a response to the question "Why that Chinese woman's words mean anything at all?" I am truly sorry for all the hurts that caused by cold feeling felt, but they were never the group who liked to see me have financial losses that may further impact on so many people's life. CDC related subprime loans were the real reason.
----Dec. 15th, 2017
Heard this morning's broadcasting about a Chinese female who was a former producer of this radio program in 2016 time.
My response: She was the person, by rumor, insisted on to broadcast my stories as she preferred. She was the person called a Chinese male Germany resident who has the exact same Chinese name as mine to state Min Fang has nothing to do with 2008 Beijing Olympic Games Opening Ceremony to confuse public audience who I am.
By rumors, she was the major person in Chinese producing team in 2016 time that insisted on producing radio program in such a way to confuse the public if I have any non-sexual professional or academic achievements. I did call law enforcement's help on Chinese producing team's efforts in 2016,
Rumored, she is a relative by DNA to a Chinese female diplomat who has demanded financial providing for her own biological child from me. I refuse if rumors about demanding are true.
----Dec. 15th, 2017
Heard there is some confusion about the Fund that causes O'Connors' confusion.
My response: The confusion I heard was why now if it was not appropriate since Senators became paid public posts.
That fund was set up by a trust that my ancient grandfather set up for me. It has a British parent fund, a French grandparent Fund, and a great-grandparent Fund that has been registered in a country that has no known records of O'Connor family's ancestry.
As currently well known, O'Connors' family has been agreed of providing for over six generations that most of them do have huge confusion about this fund's ownership. The confusion was the same when Senators became paid public posts.
It won't be easy to explain to them from entrusting groups as well as from everybody else including those who may not understand why they could be confused, and these explaining efforts may be interpreted as attacks from ill-wishers. I was born in 1967 and this stopping process started after I inherited on June 30th of 2004. It has been lengthy because the confusion has been real and because it is not everybody clear about the details of this agreed-upon providing.
One of the evidence that the confusion has been real was how so annoying my inheriting was to O'Connors' on June 30th of 2004.
The evidence of possible misinterpreting can certainly be seen from how I complained about Tina O'Connor.
----Dec. 15th, 2017
12-14-2017 I am not an "egging" victim and I may need to continue my "no cash song"
Heard this morning's broadcasting about three possible Charles Schnieberg.
My response: None of them has anything to do with me in the past.
One is over 60 years old, one has a twin(elder children) only 6 years old, the third one is public wedding married in 2007.
My children were born in 2010 when I was a "homeless" over a year already. I am not the person having the sexuality and was "not in good shape ( a homeless already)" in 2009. My children were born through pregnancy mothers in 2010.
My biological children are not from any of that three people who were featured in this morning's broadcasting. Being their mother, I am also providing for my biological children as well as my biological lawful parents as what I decided on July 1st of 2004.
----Dec. 14th, 2017
Heard this morning's broadcasting talk about my housing and my food stamps.
My response: I heard it was broadcasted the other day that Tina O'Connor took her father's money via taking my providing of my housing and my food stamps, etc.. She took that money from my second year's providing which was provided by my inheritance fund that causes O'Connor family confusion, every penny of my second year's providing.
This morning's broadcasting was about I may still need to continue my "not enough cash" song, but my apartment and my food stamps have already been paid-in-full for years already from the first year's providing.
I have been provided by a different inheritance fund each year for four years now. I am hoping that my other two years' providing (both already paid in full) can increase my cash providing instead of being routed out like Tina O'Connor's story.
I do not remember if my cash ($300/month) would be in yearly providing, or if there are some other arrangements. There were some talks about welfare providing if I would still be anxious enough, but that was about social security disability. I am certain I won't be qualified, thanks to my great psychologist. This is the reason I have not complain about no cash from social security yet.
----Dec. 14th, 2017
Heard this morning's talk about seeding program.
My response: I also heard some rumors about some egging program. I am certain I am not a victim if there is such a psycho scheme.
THere were tons of rumors about my romance. I am the heir from a long history polygamist family may contribute to my easiness when more than one husband matrimony was discussed. But I am not the person in need of a marriage or children for financial providing and tons of decent people do(did) not like any wife to get hurt by some nonsense rumors, especially those who already mothers her husband's child or children.
I do not have any child or children from those who are already being a father in 2004 and those who moved on after the meeting in 2004. I only met few of them before 2004.
----Dec. 14th, 2017
12-13-2017 Invention was Never Easy -- About Smartphones and Wipes
Heard this morning's broadcasting about the discussion of how to make cleaning wipes.
My response: I heard what broadcasted this morning was the replay of the original discussion on July 1st of 2004. I am the living testimony of body wipes "one application can clean as a good shower".
I tried out when I was a "homeless" at Boston Logan Airport. It was one application full body clean resulted like had a good shower, as discussed.
I pass along the information that I heard some mothers want this good-shower-clean for baby wipes.
----Dec.13th, 2017
Heard the reason that Smartphone Discussion on June 30th of 2004 has more issues about "my lack of confidence in Chinese".
My response: I heard the issue is why I did not believe that Chinese could do smartphones without any known invention of a computer operating system.
This was the "discrimination vs intellectual property" argument happened on June 30th of 2004. The Taiwanese female was pissed off because I refused to privilege Chinese to be the first to invent smartphones. And I was pissed off when she took off saying that she got all the necessary information to spin all in-discussion group out. I came from the People's Republic of China and I was very sensitive to this once very popular "1980 trading style of the People's Republic of China".
It was not that I refused to privilege Chinese or I was discriminating Chinese intelligence. It was out of the consideration that there were known existing operating system's inventors in the discussion group, and the discussion was all about the possible technique concerns of "converting" their existing laptop or desktop operating system source codes to use not-sable-yet newly invented mini hardware to make a cellphone a smart one that is equivalent to a laptop computer without a keyboard and a mouse. How could anyone who never had operating system invention experience can finish this project as fast as possible?
The argument started after we almost finished the entire discussion. Taiwanese group was not the discussion contribution group, they participated by listening to our discussion. I was pissed off seriously when she stated she got all the necessary information and her company did not need us at all. We were the discussion contributed group, I was the annoying talker always cut-in with the correct answers before the other three people whenever there was a concern need to be addressed, I was not intentionally to be so annoying and I contributed a lot. It was our intellectual contribution that has huge financial values, it was never that Taiwanese' to claim or to take away like that. *Heard the other three people were Mr. Bill Gates (DOS), Mr. Paul Allen (Window) and late Mr. Steve Jobs (Mac).
About the "discrimination anger", how could it possibly reasonable to expect those who could do the job wait for the Chinese to learn how to do it? or if the expectation was those who could do the job should sacrifice their own business opportunities but teach Chinese how to do it? Why or how or who could be so privileged to have this kind of expectation?
That Taiwanese owns an electronics technology company but she was not a computer programmer. I understood she did not understand that I was not the reason if Chinese can invent a computer operating system or not, and I will never be the reason. Why? No Chinese need my approval to sit in front a computer or a desk to write up some operating source codes that can make any computer that is assembled from every single piece of hardware to operate with.
I heard some Chinese from the People's Republic of China were also pissed off because of similar reasons. And plus why I discriminate Chinese while knowing Bill Gates who invented DOS was not even college graduated, and Steve Jobs invented Mac only in one year time after his college graduation.
I can only answer these kinds of accusations with "I do not know why no Chinese has invented any computer operating system yet. I really do not know."
Now I am wondering why People's Republic of China's government kept saying I am so fake because it is impossible that I could have any achievement in Computer Science because I worked full time in a restaurant for my 2 years graduate study on Computer Science and worked for Janus Associates on the Biogate project for only 4 and half years.
Exactly, what is the issue?
----Dec. 13th, 2017
12-12-2017 Heard about three classic pieces of "Perform to spend money or Fake to make Intellectual Income"(听说了三段经典"表演就可以花别人的钱及假装就可以挣到智慧产权")
Heard this morning's broadcasting caused confusion of if it is a quoted salary.(中文附后）
My response: It is not a quoted salary.
It is confusing because of the editing results of broadcasting an immediate appended next line that was said by a People's Republic of China's citizen. I heard this was helped by the Jessica who is the announced mother of a Mr. R's child(ren).
Normally, an investor only willing to take out limited amount each year from the investment in order to keep investment going for the next year. This is the reason it is a quoted "salary" in-jokes.
Agreed-upon providing need to be agreed by the representative of an investment because it is from a special reason spending for the investment's owner's capital account that needs to be agreed by the owner or by the owner's representative.
It was broadcasted this morning that O'Connors families agreed-upon providing has been agreed by this Fund's parent investor Fund, but it is in process of stopping.
----Dec. 12th, 2017
Heard this morning's confusion from P. R. China how that is my Fund.
My response: It was by my ancient grandfather's own specification. Let me explain.
My ancient grandfather (my grandfather A), the person who set up the trust, specified in his letter (will) that the daughter born with family heir birthmark from his which son's(my grandfather B's) heir birthmark line would be the sole beneficiary person of this trust. The specified son in the will letter (my grandfather B) is the son having family heir birthmark.
My grandfather B, the heir-son of this grandfather A that was specified in this grandfather A's letter(will), did not have a girl but a boy(my grandfather C) born with a family heir birthmark. So, my grandfather B informed those who have been taking care of the trust that his heir birthmark boy(grandfather C) would be the line that this heir-birthmark beneficiary girl would be born from.
And so on for my grandfathers till my grandfather Fang, Zhiren's(方智仁) generation. My father Fang, Wenhai(方文海) is my grandfather's (方智仁) heir birthmark boy. My grandfather Fang, Zhiren(方智仁) informed those who have been taking care of the trust that the beneficiary heir birthmark girl would be from his heir birthmark son Fang, Wenhai(方文海).
I was born in 1967 with the same family birthmark palms almost identical to my father's(方文海) birthmark palms.
This is how I say I inherited this trust that was set up by my ancient grandfather(my grandfather A) according to my ancient grandfather's(grandfather A's) will. That Fund was set up by the trust I inherited is the reason that is my Fund.
It was broadcasted this morning that this trust was set up for Fang, Zhiren's granddaughter(方智仁的孙女）who is from Fang, Wenhai, the eldest son of Fang, Zhiren(即方智仁的长子方文海所出的女儿）.
----Dec. 12th, 2017
Heard the People's Republic of China's relentless efforts of performing art to spent whoever's money presentation was inspired by performing art teaching materials imported from the U.S.
My response: I heard about these 2-3 "classic pieces of my performing skills" from 2004's meetings' records. I informed law enforcement's about this over a year ago.
The "classic" piece was "how I performed to spent famous R's family wealth" no matter how I was objected strongly every time I was expressing how to spend some money. It was a classic piece how I was not a bit flinched or concerned if I would get caught in any trouble.
Why would I flinch or concerned? I was spending my own money I inherited from my own birth Chinese grandfather who was definitely not any Mr. R. I was happy everytime I was objected because I thought I was congratulated that I have my own handsome money to spend.
I never even contacted R's anybody after July 1st of 2004's meeting, how could I possibly spend R's family wealth by just saying it in my green card application representing attorney's office in Stamford, Connecticut?
----Dec. 12th, 2017
Heard why the People's Republic of China's government insist on I am a fake was also related to this performing art teaching materials.
My response: That is possibly some Chinese firmly believe that perform can claim Intellectual Incomes even those are even not performing art related.
That was another "classic" piece of June 30th, 2004 presents how I could fake some computer comments regarding smartphones without a flinch that fooled those top-notch computer professionals like Steve Jobs, Bill Gates and Paul Ellen.
Why would I flinch? I had been a computer operating system programmer. That three people had written operating systems' source codes. I had worked on operating system source codes that related to computer security component. I wrote a software piece that can login to any window’s computer without a password. Of course, I know operating system on source codes level very well. I am the top notch computer security professional, at least that's who I was in 2004. Why would I need to perform or fake my comments on what might be the issues of writing a new operating system's source codes?
Those comments I made about computer operating system would be like a medical school graduate's comments on a baby wipes' formula. Why would any medical school graduate need to fake any comment what possible ingredients that can be used in a baby wipe? It is correct that a pharmacist is the person that can produce a formula, but I am a pharmacologist who is profession-ed between a pharmacist and a medical doctor. Of course, I know some formula basics more than a medical doctor. why I need to fake or perform?
I do not know what is the third "classic performing piece" yet.
----Dec. 12th, 2017
听说了今天早上的广播所造成的那是不是打了个引号的工资的疑惑。
我的回应：那不是什么打了个引号的工资。
造成这个疑惑的原因是因为制作编辑的时候在原话后面添加上了一句由中华人民共和国的一个公民所说的一句话。我听说这份制作编辑的努力是由那个R先生已经宣布的孩子妈做的。
一般来说，一个投资人业主为了永续投资，都是每年只从投资实体里拿一部分的钱出来提供家用和零花。这也是为什么会开玩笑说那就是从投资实体领的“工资而已”。
“同意供给”需要由一个投资实体的投资人业主代表的同意才可以就是因为这是一个特殊原因的支出，不是投资实体的经营性支出， 所以需要投资人业主代表的签字从投资实体的投资人业主账户里支出，
今天早上的播出播出的是O'Connor家里的“同意供给”一直都是由该基金的上级投资公司同意的，现在已在逐步停止过程当中。
----2017年12月12日。
听说了今天早上的广播谈到来自中华人民共和国的困扰说为什么那是我的基金。
我的回应：那是根据我自己祖爷爷的界定。让我来解释一下。
我的祖爷爷（我爷爷A），也就是设立这个信托的那个人在他的信里（遗嘱里）界定了一个由他自己的哪个儿子（我爷爷B）所出的家族继承胎记一支的一个有着家族继承胎记的女儿是这个信托的唯一受益人。遗嘱信中所界定的那个儿子（我爷爷B）是一个有家族继承胎记的儿子。
我爷爷B，也就是我爷爷A在他自己所立遗嘱里所界定的继承人儿子，没有生出一个有继承胎记的女儿而是生了一个有继承胎记的儿子（我爷爷C）。所以，我爷爷B就通知了那些照看着这个信托的人，这个信托的继承胎记女受益人将是由他这个有继承胎记的儿子（我爷爷C）这支所出的。
就这样一代又一代，直到我爷爷方智仁这一代。我的父亲方文海是我爷爷方智仁所出的有继承胎记的儿子。所以我爷爷方智仁就通知了那些照看着这个信托的人，这个信托的继承胎记女受益人将是由他这个有继承胎记的儿子方文海这支所出的。
我是1967年出生，我的家族胎记掌纹和我父亲方文海的胎记掌纹几乎是一摸一样的。
这是为什么我说我是按照我祖爷爷（我爷爷A）的遗嘱继承了我祖爷爷（我爷爷A）所设立的这个信托。那个基金是由我所继承的这个信托所设立的，所以我说那是我的基金。
今天早上的播出的是”信托是为方智仁的孙女即方智仁的长子方文海所出的女儿方敏所设立的。“
----2017年12月12日。
听说了中华人民共和国这份用表演艺术来花别人钱的不懈努力是受到了从美国进口的表演艺术教材的启发。
我的回应：我是听说了有这么两三段从2004年的会议记录里截取的所谓”我的表演才华的经典片段“。我大概在一年多以前就已经通知了美国警方。
这一段“经典”是关于我如何花了赫赫有名的R家族的钱财，完全不管我是如何一次次被别人试图强力阻止，就只是一直表达我就是要花这些钱。这是一个经典片段呈现了我是如何一点都不打楞, 还一点都不担心自己惹上麻烦，我就这么成功的当众把别人的钱给花了。
我打愣干嘛，担心干嘛？我是在花我自己所继承的我自己亲生爷爷的钱，我花的是我所继承的我自己方家的华人爷爷的钱，我所有的爷爷就从来没姓过什么R。每一次“别人的强力阻止”都让我很开心，就因为我以为这个别人是在祝贺我有我自己的大把钱可以花。
我在2004年7月1日会议之后就没和R家的任何人联系过，我哪有可能在康州斯坦福我自己绿卡申请律师的办公室里说说话就把R家族的钱给花了？
----2017年12月12日。
听说了中华人民共和国政府坚持说我是假的也和这个表演教材有关。
我的回应：这可能造成了一些华人坚定的认为表演表演就可以拿到和表演艺术完全无关的智慧产权。
这另一个“经典片段”是2004年6月30日那天的。呈现的是有关我如何可以眼睛眨都不眨一下的装腔作势谈论一些有关智慧手机的话题，还把顶级的电脑专家史蒂夫·杰布斯，比尔·盖茨，鲍尔·艾伦都给糊弄闹懵了。
我眼睛眨巴干嘛呀？我是电脑运作系统程式的程序员。那三个人是写过电脑运作系统程式的原始码的，我是做电脑运作系统程式里的保安系统程式的原始码的。我写的程式是可以不用任何密码缓存(no cached password) 就可以登录视窗系统的。我当然很熟悉电脑运作系统程式的程序码。我在2004年是顶级的电脑保安专家。当我谈论写一个新的电脑运作系统的程序可能会碰到那些问题的时候，我为什么需要表演或是装模做样的来谈论？
我对写一个新的电脑运作系统程式的评论，就像一个医学院校的毕业生会对婴儿擦巾应该有些什么成分会做的谈论一样的。为什么一个医学院校的毕业生需要在谈论婴儿擦巾的可能成分配方时装模做样？确实，一个药剂师才有可能会是这个成分配方的产生着，但我是介于医学和药学之间的药理专业毕业的，当然在配方合成上会比医学系毕业的要懂得多一些了。我装腔作势表演什么呀？
我还不清楚那第三段“表演经典”是什么。
----2017年12月12日。
12-11-2017 You are not the person can spend my money
Heard this morning's broadcasting of "whose else has been announced to own?"
My response: It is too shocking a public channel can be abused to perform such "announced to own" scheme.
I refuse to be the victim of this "announced to own" scheme.
I refuse to let my belongings to be given out without my own will.
I refuse to let anyone have any sayings over my anything.
I refuse to let my anything to be "announced to own" even the announced receipt person is a prestigious prominent.
I heard laws have been in process of protecting, and I did call laws help on this since mid of 2015.
----Dec 11, 2017
Heard in the meeting there were sayings "you are not the person can spend his money."
My response: Actually, it was more than one person said this for several different "his money". I never minded because I have been the same.
The sayings about me have been even if it is a gift to the young and handsome Crown Prince I fancy romance desperately, I would still be pondering if the gift that is exclusively for himself and only accessible by himself is priced small enough.
I am known for making the gift spending budget's monetary value decently smaller by changing its currency from U.S. Dollar to Chinese RMB.
I was willing to give my grandfather's siblings, my father's siblings and my own younger brother a 500 Million each as a gift since I am the sole beneficiary of my grandfathers' blessing. And I changed its currency from U.S. dollar to Chinese RMB because it is 6 patrons total. Now it is changed to 20Million each in Chinese RMB because "they failed not to let me have some excuses to deduct the amount of it" as conditioned on July 1st of 2004.
----Dec 11, 2017I am known for making the gift spending budget's monetary value decently smaller by changing its currency from U.S. Dollar to Chinese RMB.
I was willing to give my grandfather's siblings, my father's siblings and my own younger brother a 500 Million each as a gift since I am the sole beneficiary of my grandfathers' blessing. And I changed its currency from U.S. dollar to Chinese RMB because it is 6 patrons total. Now it is changed to 20Million each in Chinese RMB because "they failed not to let me have some excuses to deduct the amount of it" as conditioned on July 1st of 2004.
12-10-2017 Why I have no money in State of Massachusetts of the United States
Heard this morning's broadcasting about why I have no money in Massachusetts.
My response: Investor tax is a federal tax only that paid when money is taken out from investing, which normally is when money is transferred out of the investing accounts. For my case, it is when money is paying for my exclusive usage (spending) from my trusts. My medical treatment expense associated investor tax, by rumor, has paid in someone else's name, not a pseudo name, to let this or that person have some tax refund and "privileges" to fight for who owns the Fund that paid this tax. I called laws help on this matter.
Intellectual Income has both Federal and MA taxes. For my case, I called laws help since every penny of my intellectual making, by rumor, has been announced on the radio program to be owned by someone else and transferred into that person's bank account through radio program's promotion. I called laws help on this matter.
My investments in Massachusetts are business entities that pay Business related taxes. And those businesses do not have my private capital accounts because those are my trusts' investment's investment's investment, etc. My capital accounts are in my trusts. I am provided for by a local American Fund when the local business representative is authorized to deduct those spending from its parent Fund's capital accounts. That is the reason I changed my inquiries to check if there is any money paid to Boston Housing Authority or Boston Transition Department according to what was decided on July 1st of 2004, and if those paid to Boston Housing Authority or Boston Transition Department are lawfully paid for my exclusive usage.
----Dec. 10th, 2017
Heard this morning's broadcasting of why can't a female have a saying over my money just by the privilege who father her child(ren).
My response: I refuse to let any female to have any saying over my any money just by the fact I am a female who has no chance to seed a female or father a female's child(ren).
I refuse to let any female to have any saying over my any money just by the fact I am a wealthy woman who does not desire any male who is already an OLD MAN to father another female's child(ren).
I swear I am not biological associated with the person who fathers this female's child(ren) no matter how authentic this female's child(ren)'s blood truly reflect her child(ren)'s father's side blood origin.
I swear my wealth's origin is not associated with the person who fathers this female's child(ren) no matter how authentic her child(ren)'s blood truly deserve the child(ren)'s father's side blood originated wealth.
I swear I never sexually enjoyed any female since the day I was born in the People's Republic of China.
I swear I do not know why those P. R. China's female citizens insist on to demand this or that from me as if I desire them sexually and desperately.
I swear I never sexually enjoyed any female since the day I became a female resident of Massachusetts of the United States.
I swear I will never sexually enjoy any female no matter how long I will stay as a female resident of Massachusetts of the United States.
* Massachusetts of the United States is the first State that has the lawful same-gender marriage.
*Old man is how a child refers the biological father in U.S. English.
----Dec. 10th, 2017
Heard the "authentic true blood" is based on the year when a child was born.
My elaborate:
The 1940s was World War II time. Anyone could be the blood giver to a wife's child if the husband was fighting for the freedom, even if that was "helping the fighting on the United States soil".
The 1960s was Hippies time. Everybody supposed to be the blood giver of everybody's child.
The 1970s was Marching for the Vietnam War time. Everybody cared about possible lives losses possibly was a blood giver of another caring person's child.
1980 was Dancing Queen time. Every girl was a dancing queen and every boy certainly would be willing to be a blood giver of a "dancing queen's child".
I have not heard about how authentic a child's blood could be for 1950s borns and for after 1990s borns.
----Dec. 10th, 2017
12-09-2017 Discrimination complaint about my horrible experiences in Boston, MA
Heard this morning's rumored broadcasting about my complaint discrimination of being sexually inactive.
My response: Let me tell you my horrible experiences in Boston, MA, other than those shits you already heard on the radio.
In early 2015, I heard the rumors that my three inheriting meetings in 2004 never happened, and my intellectual contributions did not deserve to be protected by U.S. labor laws and intellectual laws.
It was rumored that I was a beggar who intentionally put myself into this shabby situation in order to get David Petraeus' family wealth. And I was the person never wanted by any prominent male.
Nobody needs to hear my stories at all because radio company already announced on their public channel and through their local station's (magic 106.7FM) promotions to tell everyone I do not deserve anything at all.
It was after over 10 years that
I have no contact with this person,
I have no sexual activities with this person,
I have been not sexually attractive because of my financial and health situation.
Who needs to have this psycho saying that I intentionally being a beggar trying to have David Petraeus' family wealth just by being sexually unattractive to him and no contact with him at all?
I did file the discrimination complaint about my inquiries of my 2004-entrusting-meeting-decided financial providing have been completely ignored just because "It is impossible that I can have any money of my own because I was never wanted by any prominent male." or "It is impossible because I came from the People's Republic of China." I was treated like a beggar because the local radio station magic 106.7FM's manager, by rumors, has been telling everyone in Boston that she knows what is real.
It has been horrible and I have constantly called laws help on this.
----Dec 9th, 2017
Heard it was because the rumored "promise if waiting".
My response: I heard this on July 1st of 2004. I have willingly appreciated it but I was not excited about its financial-related implication. Let me explain why.
I kept saying I inherited handsome trusts that my own birth Chinese grandfathers' setup for me according to my grandfathers' wills. What that means? I have the money that is my money, not my future money. I can spend my money as I wish just like how his father can spend his father's money as his father wishes.
His father's wealth is called his inheritable which will be his wealth someday. And I already have my wealth that I already inherited the day before(June 30th, 2004). When he said he was going to let me have everything he owns, it means to my ears that everything he owns would be his saved salaries from the Military. I do appreciate his promise willingly but I was not impressed about the financial values it implied.
It was similar earlier that same day when he said he would not spend a penny on me. Every time when I was saying how I wanted this or that, he would echo like saying he would not pay for it. And I would start laughing happily every time he said so because I understood it that he was congratulating me that I have my own handsome money that is no comparison much more than his own allowance from his father.
This is the kind of jokes everybody who has inheritable understands. All my grandfathers passed away before I was born. I did not know he was not aware that I did inherit my own birth grandfathers' blessing the day before.
----Dec. 9th, 2017
Heard this morning's broadcasting featured R Foundation.
My response: I heard R Foundation has been organizing this since October of 2015. It started with an on-stage show that presenting the challenge theme of "Who the Fxxx do you think you are".
I do not know who hates me like such and why.
I did visit R center in New York City a couple of times in February and March of 2015 when I was trying to find information about what I had inherited. I did not go in to see anyone but I lingered around for less than half an hour each time. I did not dress up and I was apparently tired each time.
----Dec. 9th, 2017
12-08-2017 My Intellectual Income is Hard Earned
Heard thing morning's broadcasting of a female Chinese voice that seems to be co-operative to my counterparty.
My response: She was not my attorney. Heard she represents the party that has well-known interest conflicts with me. Heard this morning's episode was her first time ever on this radio program and her husband is not a Chinese.
Heard she is the reason that this morning's episode has the public impression if I have any intellectual contribution and why I need to be acknowledged as if I have.
If above are true, she is not the person can participate this public channel radio program producing for her client without letting the public know who her client is. Being a licensed attorney, she is the person knows this is a crime in the United States.
I have complained tons of this radio program's producing efforts like this.
----Dec. 8th, 2017
Heard this morning's broadcasting about Viagra (blue).
My response: About Viagra, I have published as one of my proud. I will continue to publish explanations about my proud achievements.
It was recorded on the same June Sunday in 2004 when I created ideas of 2008 Beijing Olympic Game Opening Ceremony and my understanding of Origin of Chinese Communism Party.
My side story was recorded by my own security cameras and, possibly, law enforcement's cameras.
I reported suspicious activities regarding the software I was working on in January of 2004. The software was the window's login replacement that can login to any window's computer without a password, its client module was what I did. The suspicious activities I reported were this software's original source codes were open to anyone to learn some programming.
The software is bio-authentication login replacement to log into any window's computer without a cached password. My achievement was my client module(component) of this software only need a valid username to grant this user the correctly privileged full access to the computer. I published the explanation of this together with CDSA-ed Secure Transport module (component) as another one of my proud. I am the first person in this entire world that achieved it in both cases.
CDSA-ed Secure Transport was a component I achieved that used CDSA like the Great Wall to protect this secure transport module (component) while using encryptions to protect data. But honestly, how this CDSA wrapped that module, I have no idea. I only knew if I did not do what I did, it just wouldn't work. It was never simple like just wrapping a CDSA_XX_FunctionName around a function. That wrap is to make it pluggable. How this Common Data Security Architecture is framed, I am being honest to say I did not know. I knew this Secure Trasport Module I did was framed somehow.**CDSA is Common Data Security Architecture. It is an Architecture, not an interface.
On that June Sunday in 2004, I was having all these new perspectives about almost everything that I had read or thought of, I couldn't stop solo-speaking a lot of what I had figured out on that day for over an hour. That day, I was visiting a college dormmate lived around Edison area.
----Dec. 8th, 2017
Heard about confusion how intellectual contribution can be appropriately acknowledged and rewarded.
My response: I use a very publicly familiar group of people, movie producing team, to illustrate this.
I have this great idea this "bla bla" can be a great movie;
A literature person agreed and write a script from my "bla bla" story.
A person who knows how to make a movie agreed and called in a group to make a movie.
This group of people includes a movie director, actresses and actors and supporting staff.
My "bla bla" story thus turned into a very popular movie.
I am so proud I am the creator of this movie that attracted so many people.
The literature person is so proud of being the scriptwriter that wrote so many great lines.
The producer is so proud this is a popular movie.
The group of people is so proud of the directing, or the roles they played, or the settings/costumes designed, etc.
Who contributed what, or how well contributed, or what is the appropriate reward is all very clear to all of us that participated this turns "bla bla" into a popular movie.
It is the same in manufacturing industries or service-providing industries.
----Dec. 8th, 2017
11-27-2017 All About Viagra(Blue) and Why is my contribution
Computer Technology and CDSA
Ph.D. in Computer Science & Reforming QA in JP Morgan Chase
About 2008 Beijing Olympic Game Opening Ceremony (北京奥运会开幕式创意）
----Dec. 8th, 2017
12-07-2017 Being a sexually inactive Chinese female should not mean "impossibly can have money"
I filed the official complaint with Massachusetts General Attorney Maura Healey's Office about possible discrimination against me being a sexual inactive female Massachusetts resident who was migrated from the People's Republic of China.
Being a sexually inactive female who was migrated from the People's Republic of China should not mean "impossibly can have my own inheritances from my own birth grandfathers".
Being a sexually inactive female who was migrated from the People's Republic of China should not mean "impossibly can have my hard earned intellectual incomes".
I did call law's help on this possible intentionally blocking me being lawfully provided for via Boston Housing Authority and Boston Transition Department according to what was decided on July 1st of 2004.
I do not know what was the story. It was decided on July 1st of 2004 that I should be provided for by my own money via Boston Housing Authority and Boston Transition Department.
If I am lawfully provided for affluently as decided on July 1st of 2004, by the money which has never been owned by those males who announced-never-wanted-me, who can call me a shit beggar?
12-06-2017 Who needs to shit my name?
----Dec. 7th, 2017
12-06-2017 Who needs to shit my name?
Heard this morning's broadcasting about who validated my inheriting.
My response I am happy to make the minor correction that it was announced by the U.S. General Attorney's Secretary who represented U.S. Supreme Court Judges that announced my inheriting on June 30th of 2004 has been valid. Thanks very much.
----Dec. 6th, 2017
Heard this morning's frustration who need to shit all these names.
My response: I share the same anger how my name was shitted.
I am using my ancient Chinese Emperors grandfathers' last name, and I built my name "Min Fang" in English through my own hard working on my non-sexual natured profession, computer science and Basic Medical System related.
It was my own inheriting from my own birth grandfathers' let me have those public meeting chances in 2004 to present the knowledge that I had accumulated inside of me. Those meetings I had in 2004 were never from anybody's charity. Those were my own inheriting meetings.
I knew my last name I inherited was shitted by Chinese government just because Chinese government did not know my ancestors had already moved to my hometown Jinling area (Nanjing, 南京又称金陵）around 1000 years ago at Southern Tang dynasty time(937-976AD) so they announced on the radio I am the fake to demand my inheritances should be theirs to have sayings over.
I knew my name was shitted because some Americans did not know how I made my intellectual income, so they shitted my name to announce on the radio I am a shit beggar that all my intellectual making should be theirs to own.
I knew my name was shitted a never wanted whore just because some females deserve to have a rich man.
I did call laws help on all these shits threw at me via the public channel radio.
----Dec. 6th, 2017
12-05-2017 What is International Monetary Fund
Heard this morning's talk about International Monetary Fund.
My response: International Monetary Fund (IMF) is not United Nation (UN). Both are not financed by donations.
IMF, like a financial institute, use the money to lend loans. UN, like world governments union, used the money to do peacekeeping and developing economies.
The primary difference between the International Monetary Fund, or IMF, and the World Bank lies in their respective purposes and functions. The IMF exists primarily to stabilize exchange rates, while the World Bank’s goal is to reduce poverty. Both organizations were established as part of the Bretton Woods Agreement in 1945.
(https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/043015/what-difference-between-international-monetary-fund-and-world-bank.asp)
----Dec. 5th, 2017
References:
Two Organizations are different on how their financial resources are used.
IMF uses its quota-funded holdings of currencies of financially strong economies, together with its own SDR holdings, to make up its own usable resources to perform its finance lending.
(http://www.imf.org/external/np/exr/facts/pdf/finfac.pdf)
UN uses its funding to cover its peacekeeping operation supporting-budget and its regular budgeted items which includes Strategic framework, its program budget, its contingency fund, etc.
(www.un.org/ga/60/fifth/budgetingprocessstandard.ppt)
Two Organizations are different on it principles and purposes:
IMF is an organization of 189 countries, working to foster global monetary cooperation, secure financial stability, facilitate international trade, promote high employment and sustainable economic growth, and reduce poverty around the world.
(http://www.imf.org/en/About)
UN can take action on the issues confronting humanity in the 21st century, such as peace and security, climate change, sustainable development, human rights, disarmament, terrorism, humanitarian and health emergencies, gender equality, governance, food production, and more.
(http://www.un.org/en/sections/about-un/overview/index.html)
Two Organizations are financed differently:
IMF: Most resources for IMF loans are provided by member countries, primarily through their payment of quotas. Multilateral and bilateral borrowing work as a second and third line of defense by providing a temporary supplement to quota resources.
(http://www.imf.org/en/About/Factsheets/Where-the-IMF-Gets-Its-Money)
UN: Beyond the UN proper, there are a number of related Specialized Agencies, Funds and Programmes. The UN Programmes and Funds, including UNICEF, UNDP, UNHCR and the WFP are financed through voluntary contributions from member countries, and in some cases also from businesses through precarious "corporate partnerships.
(https://www.globalpolicy.org/un-finance/tables-and-charts-on-un-finance/the-financing-of-the-un-programmes-funds-and-specialized-agencies.html)
Two Organizations are different on how their financial resources are used.
IMF uses its quota-funded holdings of currencies of financially strong economies, together with its own SDR holdings, to make up its own usable resources to perform its finance lending.
(http://www.imf.org/external/np/exr/facts/pdf/finfac.pdf)
UN use its funding to cover its peacekeeping operation supporting-budget and its regular budgeted items which includes Strategic framework, its program budget, its contingency fund, etc.
(www.un.org/ga/60/fifth/budgetingprocessstandard.ppt)
----Dec. 5th, 2017
12-04-2017 All about Helping People in Developing Countries through International Monetary Fund
Why International Monetary Fund was persuaded to listen to anonymous me?
My response: Heard International Monetary Fund was persuaded to listen to me by a U.S. diplomat, as you heard from this morning's radio program, was the reason that P. R. Chinese diplomats have been using the same approach with determination to let everyone listen to any female they approved to be the authentic sexually related with a prominent male on any matter that I am related.
That was on July 1st of 2004, I had my huge inheriting on June 30th of 2004, it was just the next day. That diplomat, who is not Mr. David R or any Mr. R, may have heard that I may have some investments in International Monetary Fund through IMF's non-quota funding sources. Not sure if this is the reason.
Heard Tina O'Connor was the reason I was fanned approached in United Nation (New York City location) when I took my parents to visit there. It was after her roommate's visit to my graduation commencement in 2000. Those who graduated the same year from Bridgeport University may have all heard the American guy they saw was living with a British female already after they noticed that guy was alerted to my name. Tina O'Connor was that British female. I heard of his visit in 2004.
*I was not introduced to U.S. Military by David Petraeus or his relatives. BioGate's Secure Transport component was the introduction in January of 2004.
**My inheriting has nothing to do with David Petraeus. David Petraeus was not in June 30th of 2004's meeting. Apple being the smartphone manufacturing company was upon my request in June 30th of 2004's meeting which was based on my vision of smartphones' web surfing as main supplement usage. Apple Company was not invested by any big names other than Mr. Jobs in 2004.
----Dec. 4th, 2017
Heard this morning's talk about Mr. David R's proud introduction of his cousin Mr. John R's achievements.
My response: I heard Mr. John R is a professional connoisseur of paintings. He discovered a lot of great art pieces from regional traditional painters worldwide.
Even though I heard he said I got nothing to do with IMF, I still have to say I have contributed to IMF. His achievements are the proof that I have contributed my own knowledge to IMF.
IMF stands for International Monetary Fund that has been devoted to help developing countries to participate in world trading.
On July 1st of 2004, I was asked if I would be willing to help people in developing countries, I said of course. I was told they have tons of great stuff and I was asked if I could come up with some ideas how to help them.
The first thing came up to my mind was that great stuff must be some sort of rattans, straws or paintings. I enjoy knitting a lot and I know a great knitting piece can be a great piece of art. So, I said show us everything you have, we would filter them. If a piece is great, we trade it the great price of a piece of art. If a piece is a practical piece, we sell it cheap priced.
As you have heard on the radio this morning, R Foundation reached out immediately saying "Just inform us if there is a piece of art", and W company reached out also saying "Just inform us if that is a commodity usage piece." And I heard that great stuff they have were never limited to rattans alike.
I am proud I can help them through International Monetary Fund.
----Dec. 4th, 2017
Heard this morning's broadcasting of International Hospitals.
My response: That is one my proud of proud-s. I was known for "couldn't do my pharmacology final project" when I graduated from Shanghai Medical University in 1990, but I did graduate with the good knowledge.
Those International Hospitals also started with the question "Do you think you should help healthcare in developing countries?"
I grew up in P. R. China, and I had some negative impression about its public hospitals' maintenances and daily crowds. So, when I applied for medical college in 1985, I chose pharmacology major to be a future pharmacologist instead of medicine major to be a medical doctor.
And when I was asked why not invest some hospitals in developing countries, I disagreed if similar hospitals that I had some negative impression about would be what I like to invest. In my vision, I would like to invest in some hospitals like clinics or hospitals in the United States. But this kind of hospitals would not be practical in developing countries.
So, I said, we could invest some tourism-oriented hospitals that majorly serve those from developed countries, tourists or those who work there for international business. And import some licensed medical doctors from developed countries to practice medicine there, so visitors to those hospitals could expect to receive full health care instead of emergency care only.
I was asked "Why not help local people? Do you think we should help people of those countries?" I said, of course, we should.
In my vision, those hospitals should recruit local medical doctors and train them in developed countries, and supporting staffs of those hospitals should be recruited from locals and trained in developed countries. So, these hospitals can be run by the standards to make visitors feel comfortable about the quality of medical services those hospitals provide.
And further, through those local doctors employed by these hospitals, we could associate these hospitals with local medical schools and provide certain training to local doctors employed by local hospitals. Those local doctors may not be able to come to developed countries to study, but they can have these training provided by sharp knowledge healthcare professionals from developed countries.
And, if there is a characteristic local patient, these hospitals can reach out to provide free help, or even transfer this patient to a hospital in a developed country to receive free medical treatment that funded by improving medical treatment purpose. And, if locals have some local characteristic diseases, these hospitals may address those diseases as medical treatment research projects.
So, I was saying, we could help local people by improving quality of medical services they receive.
I am proud I can help them through International Monetary Fund.
----Dec. 4th, 2017
Heard this morning's talk about the potato.
My response: It was as broadcasted sometime ago on this same radio program.
I have been enjoying cooking a lot, but I was never a great chief. My hometown dishes are known for easy cooking skills required. Nanjing Stews (南京砂锅) has been the food I grew up with and I am good at. We, Nanjingese, are known for looking for great tastes and great textures through simple stews. That is why I am picky about taste and texture even I am a lousy "chief".
My father grew up in Shanghai which has been a city known for "talking chiefs city". Every single Shanghainese, a male or a female, can talk-cooking great dishes no matter that person can or cannot cook in a kitchen. My father has taught my mother a lot of talk-cooking great dishes but my mother kept fail his teaching in our kitchen, so I took on this hard job to teach my mother talk-cooking dishes ever since I was little. This is how I learned and practiced being a great talk-cooking chief as you heard on the radio.
I am happy that there are varieties of new flavors of potatoes including rice flavored potatoes, by taste and by texture, that can be cooked like rice now, and there are all kinds of rice flavored or wheat flavored potato varieties that can be produced in a variety of farming weather zones.
What a great achievement from devoted agriculturists. What a great help to improve people's food quality in developing countries.
I am proud I can help them through International Monetary Fund.
----Dec. 4th, 2017
Borrowed title of "The David Petraeus Scandal, Explained".
My response: this "The David Petraeus Scandal, Explained" was borrowed from an article by Adam Weinstein and Mark Follman published on NOV. 12, 2012 8:54 PM.
Retrieved from
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/11/david-petraeus-scandal-explained/
----Dec. 3rd, 2017
Heard this morning's broadcasting of this "The David Petraeus Scandal, Explained".
My response: I finally relaxed about this whole story.
When I read that People's magazine of this story at a church in Boston, I was reading with a reserved expression on my face. The male party is the person I did not recognize, which was a big comfort. But the story was telling the sexual relationship was real, this was the concerned I had if I would be in trouble. But it was mentioned somehow it started after the male party's retirement from the Military.
I was the person chatted with a David Petraeus I met in a Hyatt Regional in Virginal and Washington border area about publish a fake scandal story about him. That chat was on July 1st of 2004.
On June 30th of 2004, I was called to my green card application representing attorney's office to have a teleconference. It was about my inappropriate romance that violated the Military's decision. I was active in service then and I was told that all the questions were from the Marshall Court.
In January of 2004, I was ordered not to have any romance association with the David Petraeus I met after I was recruited. Sometime after that, I agreed to date the David Petraeus I met after a phone conversation with him. That Marshall Court was for what after that phone call.
July of 2004, the David Petraeus I met was on his Marshall Court for the same reason. It was ruled he would be on Probation on his romance until his retirement from the Military.
The chat about the fake scandal was after that ruling. The entire time, both me and the David Petraeus I met were laughing because the ruling of Probation made the plan a fake only. And I was telling everybody he got "enhanced security" on his sexual desire that was offered free from the Military, not a chance the Military would let him make it real.
Heard this morning's story about "Fully Dressed Push-ups" in front of surrounded Military officers and the flick evidence second of mutual sexual relationship. Either both or at least the female party was specially equipped to have this mutual willing sexual relationship. This special equipment was never from that chat of fake scandal I participated on July 1st of 2004.
Before that chat of fake scandal on July 1st of 2004, there was another chat on that same day that I was curious how a female can urinate decently in fields resulted in a clean dress. I was told a folding below crochet area will do the trick. It was a "knowledge" that chuckled everybody who was there, especially those from the entertainment industry.
I do not know anything about what happened after July 1st of 2004. But in that chat of fake scandal on July 1st of 2004, I never "assign" any female to be the featured person in that chatted fake scandal.
I never intended to put the David Petraeus I met into troubles of violating Military Probation. I never involved with anything beyond that chat of fake scandal on July 1st of 2004.
The male party announced he never had anything to do with me, and the female party is the person who never had anything to do with me.
----Dec. 3rd, 2017
12-02-2017 All about who should be the decision-maker of parenting of a child.
Heard this morning's screams of so many prominent wives' determinations on making illegal decisions that have huge or small impacts on my life.
My response: I sue every one of them for this crime they possibly committed.
I am a U.S. citizen who has the freedom of making my own decisions of my own money, and everything else. My lawful rights are granted by U.S, Constitution, never charities from their husbands.
My money is from my own birth biological family. I inherited trusts set up for me by my own birth grandfathers. My money is never their husbands' charity. My money is never their husbands to have any saying over. And I do not have a dipstick to privilege these females to fancy their wombs can be attractive to me so that my money can be theirs' to decide.
I am not interested in their prominent husbands because I am good with my own standing, and I have no need to sacrifice a bit quality of my romance life. I really do not fancy those husbands' so prominent full of experiences aging appearances.
This was my attitude in 2004 towards everyone who, in 2004, was a husband with biological child (children) already.
I never wanted those biological-fathers-already-husbands, I never wanted those rumors to belittle myself.
I never needed those rumors to abuse my own money or to abuse my own non-sexual-natured professional achievements.
* It is better to let everybody understand my point: Not a chance a wife can be so determined without the support or understanding from the husband.
**It is better to let everybody understand that I cannot let a husband represent any of my interests knowing the husband do intent to have sayings over my lawful interests even that is against my own wish.
----Dec. 2nd, 2017
I am a U.S. citizen who has the freedom of making my own decisions of my own money, and everything else. My lawful rights are granted by U.S, Constitution, never charities from their husbands.
My money is from my own birth biological family. I inherited trusts set up for me by my own birth grandfathers. My money is never their husbands' charity. My money is never their husbands to have any saying over. And I do not have a dipstick to privilege these females to fancy their wombs can be attractive to me so that my money can be theirs' to decide.
I am not interested in their prominent husbands because I am good with my own standing, and I have no need to sacrifice a bit quality of my romance life. I really do not fancy those husbands' so prominent full of experiences aging appearances.
This was my attitude in 2004 towards everyone who, in 2004, was a husband with biological child (children) already.
I never wanted those biological-fathers-already-husbands, I never wanted those rumors to belittle myself.
I never needed those rumors to abuse my own money or to abuse my own non-sexual-natured professional achievements.
* It is better to let everybody understand my point: Not a chance a wife can be so determined without the support or understanding from the husband.
**It is better to let everybody understand that I cannot let a husband represent any of my interests knowing the husband do intent to have sayings over my lawful interests even that is against my own wish.
----Dec. 2nd, 2017
Heard this morning's talk about "Why not financially support Albert Gore's dreams".
My response: Because I do not share his dreams, any of them.
Because I do not share his self-esteem that whatever he dreams means most important.
- I like to support what makes people happy for those who truly happy enjoy their own hard making.
- I like to support to let people make decisions of their own as they wish.
Because I did express myself in 2004 that I was not interested in him and wished his own romance with some else.
- No such child would have been produced just to let him have some of my money, especially with so many decent people know his family and his late wife.
Because my money is not a free-access to anyone who wants my money, I did express myself to law enforcement to sue Albert Gore if the rumor he had raped in-sleeping me in my locked-door self-paid apartment is true.
- Whoever fancy a dipstick should have a free access to any female's sexual private, and so prominent enough that laws mean nothing at all in front the dipstick, the penis should access-free only to the birth mother's womb that produced this dipstick and should access-free only to the biological daughter's womb that produced by this dipstick. I sue for sexual harassment plus racketeering if I am threatened.
----Dec. 2nd, 2017
Heard this morning's mention of his "Fund-supported pregnancy-mother" dream.
My response: I do not share. I refuse to let my any fund to get involved in this kind scandalous public robbery activities. Let me explain why.
This has been my screams for several years. "You can not produce a child, why can't you take charity to enjoy the gift of Albert Gore's woman's or his friend's woman's own biological child? Why are you so stubborn to fancy what your wants can mean anything at all?" "You should feel grateful already that you have some child to be called your child, what are you complaining?"
You have heard my complaints he announced every penny of my hard-earned intellectual income to be owned by his friends because he cannot see how I earned them. And every penny of these announced intellectual incomes has been transferred into his friends' bank accounts ready to be spent. Some has been spent and Albert Gore still in process of announcing ownership of some money whenever he heard of it. He never uses any of this already announced money on any of his dreams other than to improve their own financial providing.
I have clarified I really have nothing to do with Albert Gore. I did call law enforcement's help in suing Albert Gore for murder attempted because, by rumor, he calls everyone to kill me for his desire to own my money.
There had been a radio program episode that featured DNA tests knowledge on Nov. 14th, 2017. It was all about how a DNA test can be cheated. There was another episode about differences on DNA technology to produce a child which featured a 6-children story.
That story was all about intended-parents are not good enough to make the decision on how to have a child-- Who is the better sperm or egg to have a child. From what I hear, the featured 6-children are not from intended parents, but results of either mixed-matched sperms with eggs or "donated eggs or sperms". Correct me if I am wrong, that episode was all about everybody else's "I said so" instead of intended-parents.
I heard the confusion about how about my children, they are helped conceived from the same lab in the same facility at the same location. My major in college is pharmacology and I can go into a lab to perform DNA test myself. With this knowledge, I am not concerned about my own pregnancy-mothered children. Because it is purely the result of individual DNA expert. A DNA expert can perform DNA lab tests by himself or herself. My children are helped conceived by another DNA expert.
I refuse to donate any money until laws can be enforced to ensure intended-parents are the decision makers of their own-intended child's blood.
If laws can not protect me to spend or donate my money as I wish, no law can protect anyone from the result of that money that being illegally spent.
*If DNA stories I heard is incorrect, please send me an email. I will do the correction.
----Dec. 2nd, 2017
You have heard my complaints he announced every penny of my hard-earned intellectual income to be owned by his friends because he cannot see how I earned them. And every penny of these announced intellectual incomes has been transferred into his friends' bank accounts ready to be spent. Some has been spent and Albert Gore still in process of announcing ownership of some money whenever he heard of it. He never uses any of this already announced money on any of his dreams other than to improve their own financial providing.
I have clarified I really have nothing to do with Albert Gore. I did call law enforcement's help in suing Albert Gore for murder attempted because, by rumor, he calls everyone to kill me for his desire to own my money.
There had been a radio program episode that featured DNA tests knowledge on Nov. 14th, 2017. It was all about how a DNA test can be cheated. There was another episode about differences on DNA technology to produce a child which featured a 6-children story.
That story was all about intended-parents are not good enough to make the decision on how to have a child-- Who is the better sperm or egg to have a child. From what I hear, the featured 6-children are not from intended parents, but results of either mixed-matched sperms with eggs or "donated eggs or sperms". Correct me if I am wrong, that episode was all about everybody else's "I said so" instead of intended-parents.
I heard the confusion about how about my children, they are helped conceived from the same lab in the same facility at the same location. My major in college is pharmacology and I can go into a lab to perform DNA test myself. With this knowledge, I am not concerned about my own pregnancy-mothered children. Because it is purely the result of individual DNA expert. A DNA expert can perform DNA lab tests by himself or herself. My children are helped conceived by another DNA expert.
I refuse to donate any money until laws can be enforced to ensure intended-parents are the decision makers of their own-intended child's blood.
If laws can not protect me to spend or donate my money as I wish, no law can protect anyone from the result of that money that being illegally spent.
*If DNA stories I heard is incorrect, please send me an email. I will do the correction.
----Dec. 2nd, 2017
Heard this morning's broadcasting of China's two females prestigious re-production government.
My response: I heard this same rumor that Chinese government this administration are grouped by seeders of this two female, each mother 6 adult children from 6 different males.
Heard People's Republic of China's current administration is half and half of each's seeders.
Heard one female's first-born was when she was in high school, the other female's firstborn was when she was in junior high school.
听说了这一届中国政府是选了这两个女人的孩子爹们组成的。这两个女人每个都是和6个不同男人有6个已成年孩子。
听说中华人民共和国的这一届政府是由这两个女人的12个孩子爹们一半一半组成的。
听说一个是在高中时生的第一胎，另一个是在初中时生的第一胎。
----Dec. 2nd, 2017
12-01-2017 What is this Radio Program's producing efforts trying to achieve?
Heard this morning's announcement from an enlisted from Chinese Military.
My response: I am a sworn U.S. citizen since June of 2015. I am a U.S Military's 3-Stars General Strategist not active in service.
I do not know what all these announcements are about.
----Dec. 1st, 2017
Heard this morning's confusion why it's a majority P.R. China's team producing a U.S. radio program.
My response: Heard it is to prove a Chinese senior official's wife is talented like some Mrs. Famous you have already heard.
I have complained why their private sexual life goodness deserves to be acknowledged by access-ability to a public microphone.
I have complained this radio program is a public scandal that forces the generic public to worship those females' private womb with a male that the generic public does not even have access to.
Heard 2015's radio program producing group has come back for holiday seasons' goodies' since end of October. Radio company let go some producers by end of October in order to re-contract this group of producing team just for the holiday season. This is the same like last year's holiday season.
I have complained this radio program is a public robbery scandal that holiday time is theirs' to announce whoever's belongings to be claimed their holiday's gifts to take.
I have complained those announcements this radio program made have always followed by some promotion efforts to let "gifts" transferred to those deserved patrons as announced.
This trend started since 2015's holiday season. I did call law enforcement's help about those announcements. I refuse to let my belongings to be announced and/or claimed their gifts.
----Dec. 1st, 2017
Since 2007 or 2010, whenever there was a discussion about some deserves, there was an announcement stating who should have this being discussed money at the end of the discussion, and the real money transferred to that being announced person's bank account after broadcasting.
The reason for on-radio discussion was because the discussing group did not know how I earned this being discussed intellectual income, and this on-radio discussion proved their intelligence, which was good enough to have my intellectual income that being discussed to be transferred into their bank account.
I did call laws help to get back my hard earned intellectual income.
-----published Nov. 28th, 2017
Radio program has been kept on very busy: Radio Producers are busy on fighting to get the microphone, Chinese Government is busy on announcing I am unwanted fake on the radio, British Royals are busy on acclaiming British deserves a rich American husband, American Riches are busy on yelling "I said so", Hispanics Females are busy on confusing everybody who father their children, Prominent Wives are busy on proving they are intelligent enough to manage everybody else' matters, Big Names are busy on expressing their confusion, money-wanters like Albert Gore, by rumor, are busy on sneak-in to announce the ownership of some money, All above shared choir of "Why can't I have her money"....
All I can do and I have done is kept on calling law enforcement's help and kept on speaking up for myself. What else should I do?
-----published Nov. 28th, 2017
My Personal Experience:
My Personal Experience from People's Republic of China:
My graduate education (Master Degree) and academic achievements in Computer Science in the United States as a U.S. resident had been respected by People's Republic of China's government before 2012.
My contributions to People's Republic of China: Special Green House Farms, Mega Cities Subway System, and Creator of Beijing 2008 Olympic Game Ceremonies are acknowledged by People's Republic of China's government before 2012. (*all have June of 2004's solid authentic original visual records ).
My understandings of Chinese Communism Party were appreciated by People's Republic of China's government before 2012.
I am publicly called a plagiarizer who impossibly can have any achievements in Computer Science, by People's Republic of China's government in 2016.
- *I left China in 1996, Computer Science Master degree graduated in 2000 from a United States' University and worked since 1999 for a United States' Security Software and Consulting company.
I am publicly called impossibly can know anything about medicine because college major is pharmacology, by People's Republic of China's government in 2016.
- *I graduated from Shanghai Medical University in 1990, majored in pharmacology. This is No.1 or No.2 medical college in People's Republic of China. It was announced this school "no longer exist", and actually this school is currently called Fudan University Shanghai Medical College (Its website： http://shmc.fudan.edu.cn/).
- Pharmacology major I received includes Basic Medical System: three years medicine course shared with medicine major. Same professors and same lab facilities for three years. Same classrooms for Internal Medicine and Psychology. I clearly remembered 150 students total in one classroom, 50 of us pharmacology majored, 100 from medicine majored.)
I am publicly called a fake who impossibly can be the creator of 2008 Olympic Opening Ceremony, by People's Republic of China's government in 2016.
- (*It was taped in June of 2004, New Jersey, United States with solid authentic original visual records ).
I am publicly called beggar and unwanted whore, by People's Republic of China's government in 2016.
- (* I was never provided for by People's Republic of China's government other than free education offered to public when I was in China, and I never demanded anyone to provide for me because of sexual activities.)
- (* I inherited my grandfathers' entrusts according to their wills in 2004 which was almost 8 years after I had lived in U.S. All those entrusts were lawfully entrusted abroad before 1949. People's Republic of China was established since 1949.)
I am publicly announced as never wanted and never needed fake talents, by People's Republic of China's government in 2016-2017.
- (* On my web blog, I stated I am the authentic biological heir of the house that can be dated back to 2000 years ago and my blood has been enriched by long history of Chinese Culture, but I am a U.S. citizen now. And I have nothing to do with People's Republic of China)
----Published Nov. 3rd, 2017
Photos shoot from the Chinese Restaurant I normally go for lunch on Dec. 1st, 2017. It printed nothing but a "Run (away) Tang". I am the heir of Chinese Tang dynasty Emperors. Tang(唐)is the same Chinese character in "China Town(唐人街)"
My Proud Achievements
11-30-2017 I did not recognize People's magazine's published Photos is a True Statement
Heard this morning's announcement that David Petraeus never even met me.
My response: I met a person in Hyatt Regional in Virginia, Washington area in 2003. I was told his name is David Petraeus. I did not recognize the David Petraeus published in the People's magazine or Chinese newspaper World Journal is a true statement.
I never had any heartbroken feeling about all these "David Petraeus never wanted you" promotion on the radio and in Boston, Massachusetts.
I never spent David Petraeus' money, or his family's, or relatives' money. I was never provided for by David Petraeus' money, or his family's money, or his relatives' money. I could not even associate People's magazine's or World Journal's David Petraeus with the person I met.
I was never heartbroken by all these hostilities expressed by David Petraeus on the radio.
----Nov. 30th, 2017
Heard this morning's broadcasting caused confusion about who father the 4 children.
My response: I would say the radio program once broadcasted Jessica Pejoves(Petroves?) mothers 4 children. This morning's is Jessica R mothers 4 children from James R (David Petraeus).
----Nov. 30th, 2017
Heard this morning's broadcasting of a Chinese female who mother a CHILD from Chines Premiere's.
My response: She is one of the patrons that I decided to call law enforcement's help before I call her a psycho.
By rumor I hear, she had stalked me in my glass house cancer treatment. She kept contact treatment providers' staff to bill me but not to provide treatment for me and transfer money to her. She requested all these very seriously because she mothers a child from the Chinese Premiere and I was never wanted by the Chinese Premiere. And she confirms the Chinese Premiere has nothing to do with me is a true statement.
I heard she did succeed sometimes because of her maiden last name (Fong or Fang), so I called law enforcement's help to find out if she is a criminal.
*If her maiden name is Fang is the reason she thinks that is her lawful money as well, she should go to an attorney to ask for help to find out.
----Nov. 30th, 2017
Heard those frustrated voices about "Why not interested in Albert Gore".
My response: I heard those frustrated voices are from Albert Gore's romance partners. I heard the frustrations were caused by my refusal to provide for Albert Gore and his associated, and the questions were asked out of disbelieves because he has been very popular among Chinese females sexually.
I did not know anything about Albert Gore other than the name printed in the newspapers before July 1st of 2004. I do not his romances at all and I am not interested to know either.
On July 1st of 2004, I was aware he is a grandfather already. This already impressed me that the grandfather should be an Old and Dry on romance-related matters that I should call a Mr. Senior.
I must say I am a Chinese U.S. female citizen, but I am really not interested in anyone who was already a Mr. Senior that stands for Old and Dry in 2004 already. I am really not interested at all about a Mr. Senior in 2004 who is 13 years more senior now.
----Nov. 30th, 2017
11-29-2017 All about clarifications on Family & Inheriting
Heard this morning's broadcasting of "mutual agreement" of his family wealth.
My response: Who are the two parties to this "mutual agreement" to announce a "car accident" to promote the younger child to the necessity of inheriting the family wealth? And such a family in general, not the direct father-son line by blood? And how generic is this family?
*In 2012, only the girl was published. At least, the girl is "acknowledged his child".
----Nov. 29th, 2017
Heard this morning's talk about the "cancellation of providing from China".
My response: I have accused People's Republic of China's government may have spent money cause me infected heavily, is this spending the "providing" need to be canceled?
Other than this virus infection accusation I made from some rumors I heard, I have never been provided for by People's Republic of China's money. I had received the free education including college education as People's Republic of China's citizen.
I have to mention that the majority of People's Republic of China's colleges, in 1985 when I went to college, was established from my birth great-great-grandfather's, my birth great-grandfather's, my birth grandfather's (方智仁) and my own entrust' donation in early 1900 ( the Republic of China ruling time's Ningbo Fang's House 民国时期的宁波方家). The college I graduated from and the college my father graduated from were both established by those donations.
This is plus the contributions I made to the People's Republic of China that were acknowledged by the People's Republic of China's government before 2012, some of which were featured on this same radio program before 2014.
*Too bad, other than my father's, I only know my grandfather's name: Fang, Zhiren (方智仁). 😈
** I have never spent any Rockefeller's money, I have never been provided for by any Rockefeller's money, nor by any Walton's money, nor by any Ford's money. I have been raised by my own birth legal parents, and I have been provided for by my own money, either by my hard earned own making or by my own birth grandfathers' blessing I inherited.
*** My providing for my biological & legal parents was decided on July 1st of 2004. I am providing for my own biological & legal parents.
----Nov. 29th, 2017
Heard this morning's mention of a Mr. Fang.
My response: The knee down is from the group who respect this Mr. Fang is the heir of Zu's family. And I heard there is one person mentioned, in this morning's broadcasting, that this Mr. Fang has no financial inheritance reserved from Zu's family.
This Mr. Fang has nothing to do with my family and my inherited wealth.
Zu's family's original family name is Zu (Zhu, 朱) which was originated from Chinese Ming Dynasty (1368AD– 1644AD).
My family's original family name is Leu (Liu, 刘) which was originated from Chinese East Han dynasty (25 AD - 220 AD). Later my family's name changed to Lee (Li, 李) sometime before my ancestors were Chinese Tang dynasty Emperors ( 618AD - 907AD). I do not know when my family name changed to current Fang (方), but I heard that was after my ancestors moved to Zhejiang province.
*My grandfathers, Southern Tang Emperors(南唐, 937 AD–976 AD), were still having Lee(Li) as the family name when they were in Nanjing area. My father attained Nanjing University in the 1960s and stayed in Nanjing after graduation, I was born in Nanjing in 1967, almost 1000 years after my ancestors left Nanjing area.
----Nov. 29, 2017
11-28-2017 Why this radio program is a public scandal
Heard this morning's broadcasting of why this radio program is produced like such a public scandal.
My response: I contribute what else I complained about:
Since 2007 or 2010, whenever there was a discussion about some deserves, there was an announcement stating who should have this being discussed money at the end of the discussion, and the real money transferred to that being announced person's bank account after broadcasting.
The reason for on-radio discussion was because the discussing group did not know how I earned this being discussed intellectual income, and this on-radio discussion proved their intelligence, which was good enough to have my intellectual income that being discussed to be transferred into their bank account.
And all these were, by rumor, organized and announced by Albert Gore, because he had led the United States for 8 years.
I have announced I have nothing to do with this Albert Gore, and I did file complaints about this Albert Gore's murder attempt for money. I did call laws help to get back my hard earned intellectual income.
Also, all these were backed up, by rumor, by Mr. O'Connor who complained that making an announcement was how his wealth being owned by me.
I have clarified that the wealth Mr. O'Connor complained about is my grandfather's entrust that I inherited according to my grandfather's will on June 30th, 2004. My inheriting has been valid according to U.S. laws. Mr. O'Connor was aware I am the sole beneficiary person of my grandfather's will and that Fund was set up by my grandfather's entrust. Mr. O'Connor was confused because of a letter his great-grandfather wrote almost 200 years ago.
Mr. Petroves, an American, had complained about the same issue as Mr. O'Connor. I have to clarify here that I had inherited more than one grandfathers' entrusts according to my grandfathers' wills together with Funds that setup by those entrusts. All my inheriting have been valid according to U.S. laws.
----Nov. 28th, 2017
Why there is no radio company's management in producing managing?
My response: Being the victim impacted by this radio program's broadcasting, I can see the efforts of radio company management trying to find out what happened.
I also heard, radio company's CEO's wife is a Hispanic. Rumored she has a cousin was rapped-like in front of the male's relatives. And the male that Mrs. Pittman was told and verified, by rumor, was the person publicly acknowledged that her cousin is a wife-like to him. Rumored he is currently providing for Mrs. Pittman's cousin's 6-month old child in Jamaica.
Mrs. Pittman, by rumor, understood that is the same person who fathers my children. I was wondering why would he do that public declaration of his sexual desire to his relatives in his 40s, and I really hope he is indeed strong as a 20s. He is almost 50 years old now. And I heard that 6 months old child is not seeded by the person who fathers my children.
----Nov. 28th, 2017
Heard this morning's broadcasting of "I thank you for let me have the money, bla bla."
My response: I need some advice on this. I have been harassed like so for several years through my glass house cancer.
I did write tons of letters to FBI because I figured it is more appropriate to let FBI officers identify if they are criminals first instead of assuming they are psychos directly.
What else I heard of, there are tons of people willing to represent me voluntarily and to make decisions on my lawful interests without me even heard of these decisions.
What else should I do? Clarify these on the radio? I need to be advised on how? Why? Listen:
Radio program has been kept on very busy: Radio Producers are busy on fighting to get the microphone, Chinese Government is busy on announcing I am unwanted fake on the radio, British Royals are busy on acclaiming British deserves a rich American husband, American Riches are busy on yelling "I said so", Hispanics Females are busy on confusing everybody who father their children, Prominent Wives are busy on proving they are intelligent enough to manage everybody else' matters, Big Names are busy on expressing their confusion, money-wanters like Albert Gore, by rumor, are busy on sneak-in to announce the ownership of some money, All above shared choir of "Why can't I have her money"....
All I can do and I have done is kept on calling law enforcement's help and kept on speaking up for myself. What else should I do?
-----Nov. 28th, 2017
11-27-2017 All About Viagra(Blue) and Why is my contribution.
Heard this morning's broadcasting of the tears on July 1st of 2004 when Viagra (Blue) was announced.
My response: A lot of people can not relate to this emotional moments, especially a lot of intelligent ladies who married to great men and gave up their profession for the family they love.
So I use this love story that is common for a movie theater to illustrate what that emotion is like.
A boy and girl has grown up in the same neighborhood and became sweethearts in high school. They were each other's first time. They went to different colleges and became best friends.
They both got a job in the same city and stayed close whenever they need each other's comforts. They both thought they may end up getting married. After some looking around, she stopped fancy a marriage without him and started to plan her life with him in every big or small of her dreams.
But he is still looking around. She was there share his excitement when he met a girl with the comfortableness that he will come back to her like he usually does. A year later, he told her the wedding date is set and invitations have mailed out. She looked at him, and all she knows is no matter how close they are, no matter how she means to him, that girl is going to be his bride on that wedding day. No matter how many dreams she had that has sweet him in there, she just has to move on.
That is the emotion those researchers from other pharmaceutical companies felt on that day. Some started their careers right after their college graduation, and research has been right there in their reach. With all those devoted work for decades, unless they can find something completely different with what Viagra(Blue) team got, they just won't be able to have THE PATENT.
----Nov. 27th, 20117
Why was I crying if I was not a research?
My Response: My major in college is pharmacology that come with 3-years Basic Medical System education. I was in the industry after graduation and I was aware of there have been tons of research from Basic Medical System side and from the Pharmaceutical side. Pharmacology is a profession between Pharmacist and Medical Doctor.
On Basic Medical system side, research is focused on some unknowns, such as erect-able issue after almost perfect clean prostate surgery, to find out how human bodies naturally functioned to better understand the root cause of such health issues. It has been a known issue that a male's member cannot erect after a prostate surgery, even it is clear that surgery did not damage any known erecting related biological parts or related nerve system. Basic Medical System researchers are focusing on what else, be it hormone generating related or neurotransmitter mechanism related, that can be erecting related that may be affected by the surgery. Those researchers are normally rewarded for Noble Prize for their big findings.
On pharmaceutical side, researchers are focused on what can be done to those health issues that are generated from the known root cause, such as find out what compound that can simulate erecting related hormone or can stimulate generating erecting related hormones, etc. The compound would latter become medication, etc. These researchers are rewarded for PATENTS of the compounds that can provide treatments or improvements of the known health issues.
What I figured out is there is no need to fully resolve the human reproduction issue caused by unable to erect. The common knowledge about human reproduction is "Sperms generating first, male member erecting follows". Help to generate sperms to enable erecting is the common route for both Basic Medical System research and Pharmaceutical research on this matter*.
My contribution that recorded on a June Sunday in 2004 was "Let the man can enjoy his sex life first by helping his member erect through some local stimulating mechanism to enlarge sponge area only instead of stimulating through hormone generating, then worry about how to help this man to have a child carry his blood.".
I started to cry because I heard that Mister said: "enlarge". I knew for certain that not many people figured out what I got. I thought I had missed it this close.
I was asked if I can assume why those researchers haven't thought of "enlarge" themselves.
My response: I was never a researcher on this and I cannot assume, but I heard that Viagra (Blue) research lab stopped further research on the same Sunday after they heard my contribution.
The known knowledge about a male's member erecting was "No Sperm, No Erecting". And I heard the sponge area does not react well to common blood circulation enhancer.
My contribution was to "find out themechanism component (in original Chinese)* how some known male-enhancer herbs, etc. can help to let sponge area being helped with blood circulation (Congestion) to enlarge."
Viagra (Blue) team may have scanned all possible herbs, animal pieces,etc. that known for having male-enhancing effects as part of standard research practicing. Viagra (Blue) research lab can stop further research on the same Sunday they heard my contribution is because they already knew which components have this increase blood circulation in sponge area effects .
My contribution is saving of budget for further research and profiting from going to market early than expected.
* I graduated in Pharmacology from P.R.China, and pharmaceutical research on Chinese herbs was very popular when I was in School.
* When I lived in NYC before 1997, I knew that Dr. Cai has a male-enhancer Chinese herbs formula that he encapsulated to gave to some of his acupuncture patients. I never spied on what his formula was and I never mentioned any possible better enhancer herb's name in my contribution on that June Sunday in 2004.
*Mechanism is more Basic Medical System side research that is to find why this herb can enhance sponge area's blood circulation. Pharmaceutical side research is to find out if there is any component or extracts from those herbs can increase blood circulation in sponge area.
----Nov. 27th, 2017
My response: I was never a researcher on this and I cannot assume, but I heard that Viagra (Blue) research lab stopped further research on the same Sunday after they heard my contribution.
The known knowledge about a male's member erecting was "No Sperm, No Erecting". And I heard the sponge area does not react well to common blood circulation enhancer.
My contribution was to "find out the
Viagra (Blue) team may have scanned all possible herbs, animal pieces,etc. that known for having male-enhancing effects as part of standard research practicing. Viagra (Blue) research lab can stop further research on the same Sunday they heard my contribution is because they already knew which components have this increase blood circulation in sponge area effects .
My contribution is saving of budget for further research and profiting from going to market early than expected.
* I graduated in Pharmacology from P.R.China, and pharmaceutical research on Chinese herbs was very popular when I was in School.
* When I lived in NYC before 1997, I knew that Dr. Cai has a male-enhancer Chinese herbs formula that he encapsulated to gave to some of his acupuncture patients. I never spied on what his formula was and I never mentioned any possible better enhancer herb's name in my contribution on that June Sunday in 2004.
*Mechanism is more Basic Medical System side research that is to find why this herb can enhance sponge area's blood circulation. Pharmaceutical side research is to find out if there is any component or extracts from those herbs can increase blood circulation in sponge area.
----Nov. 27th, 2017
Background knowledge of my Basic Medical System knowledge:
The mechanism between Sperms generating and male member erecting is the unknown that related to Prostate Surgery's known impacts.
Male Sperms are fresh generated (matured) every time a male is excited. No stored sperms in a male's body.
A female's eggs matured by "batches" ever since her maturity and stored in her body.
A male cannot erect won't be able to have a child if no medical technology helped preserved sperms. A female in her 70s or 80s can still be a mother through pregnancy mother.
Without male's sperms being matured (generated), a hormone that can erect male member will not be generated, and a male's member can not erect without this hormone,.
Without sperm being matured (generated), even inject the hormone/hormone simulates or stimulate the gland to generate the hormone that is responsible to erect the male member, the male member just can not erect.
**Heard Viagra(Blue) can help result in a couple of active sperms in each outcome. The mechanism is unknown.
----Nov. 27, 2017
*Please pardon my current English level, it is hard for me to formulate longer English expressions because of my current glass house cancer treatment.
The mechanism between Sperms generating and male member erecting is the unknown that related to Prostate Surgery's known impacts.
Male Sperms are fresh generated (matured) every time a male is excited. No stored sperms in a male's body.
A female's eggs matured by "batches" ever since her maturity and stored in her body.
A male cannot erect won't be able to have a child if no medical technology helped preserved sperms. A female in her 70s or 80s can still be a mother through pregnancy mother.
Without male's sperms being matured (generated), a hormone that can erect male member will not be generated, and a male's member can not erect without this hormone,.
Without sperm being matured (generated), even inject the hormone/hormone simulates or stimulate the gland to generate the hormone that is responsible to erect the male member, the male member just can not erect.
**Heard Viagra(Blue) can help result in a couple of active sperms in each outcome. The mechanism is unknown.
----Nov. 27, 2017
*Please pardon my current English level, it is hard for me to formulate longer English expressions because of my current glass house cancer treatment.
11-26-2017 I filed discrimination complaint about "impossible can have any money because of sexually inactive"
Heard Tina O'Connor (Helena O'Connor) is still lingering in the radio program's producing.
My response: I filed complain to BBB about this radio program's sever sexual harassment. I heard FCC is like "O'Connors' family FCC" currently, and I can tell they all love this Tina O'Connor, cousin of theirs, very much. So I decided to file my complaint with BBB* before I find out which government agency to file this complaint yet. *Better Business Bureau, a non-government organization.
Heard she is privileged this round is because she is someone's younger illegitimate child. But I also heard she carries O'Connors' family look and the "rumored real biological father" is not a British.
I do not feel bad, at least not strongly, for this Tina O'Connor's confusion about her personal life and her confusion of my inheritance fund. But I do appreciate O'Connors' honesty about their family confusion is their grandfather's letter, not denying it is my grandfather's entrusted money and I am the sole beneficiary of my grandfather's will.
I met him early than her which was confirmed in January of 2004 already. She had been his roommate for 7 years only from her own willingness to move-in and her own refusal to move out. This was complained by him in January of 2004. And this adds to the fact she is the mother of her own attorney husband's children. (She is a wife to an attorney, not a Business person.)
My anger is: My inheritance fund has supported O'Connors families to contribute to the United States is not the reason she can be privileged to shit me all over on a public channel radio. That is no matter how confused she is about her great-grandfather's letter, She knows that fund is my grandfather's entrusted fund and I am the heir in this grandfather's will.
-----Nov. 26th, 2017
About my cash providing has been stopped.
My response: Per my side story, I had three inheriting related meetings in 2004, January's was to validate my Identity, June 30th was the inheriting day. And July 1st of 2004 was the one that a lot of arrangements had made regarding my decision to move up to Boston, MA from New York City area.
These arrangements include: Invested a clinic(Whittier Street Clinic) across the street in case of medical emergency. Arranged this apartment I am currently living with some cash/Foodstamp assistances, etc. All these were with payment discussion.
I was supposed to move to another spacious lodging at a better location provided by Boston Housing Authority, and having better cash providing from Boston Transition Department or Social Security till my entrust finish. And my entrust suppose to finish when my health is better.
I have been shited by this radio program and its promotion as "beggar with no money because of unwanted status with inactive sexual activities".
And my precious $300 cash providing stopped on 25th is the trigger that I filed complaints to General Attorney of Massachusetts. I need cash. I have been screaming I need to have more cash and now this precious $300/month was stopped. So I file an official complaint last night saying this is sexually related discrimination against me being sexually inactive since I moved up to Boston, MA in 2004.
*I may need to check this cash providing again today. I was confused about the date on 24th but I did receive a letter saying it would stop on 24th of this month.
I complain BHA legal department refuse to check if I have money "because I was never a Mistress like their friends". As you heard on the radio, there are too many Hispanic women fighting to be the real one who has a child with the person who may father my two children. And if you ever go into Boston Housing Authority building, you will be impressed that is a Hispanic majority department, a real majority. Its Legal Department is the only department, possibly, that has all white employees (Two only).
To be honestly, I do not know if there is anyone of those Hispanic females who featured on the radio program that has any association with the person who fathers my children. Maybe not even one is the serious complaint I have about this radio program.
It is not a white female, other than Tina O'Connor, I am complaining about this upgrading. My complaint is: After I provided references to BHA, my argument has been why don't they check the meeting record if the decided amount has paid to the BHA account as decided in July 1st of 2004's meeting, and they just kept ignoring it. And by rumors I hear, it is because I am unwanted and that is paid by somebody who never wanted me or doesn't want me anymore.
I do not know which fund suppose to pay for this. I have more than one inheritance funds that invested in some very respectful companies. The paying check is from this or that respectful company's investor accounts which is from my own money invested in the company, not this or that prominent man's money.
When I kept saying that is my own money, the rumor I heard is BHA is not certain who ultimate owns the paying account and they cannot let me use that paid amount because of this uncertainty, or that has to be understood as a donation that should pay for either whoever in need or some females screaming in-bed now. And all these left me in a situation constantly facing threats to be evicted from my current apartment.
My anger is: Why not check if that paid amount is valid lawful payment for my exclusive usage? They cannot verify who ultimately owns the paying account but they can verify if the paid amount is lawful valid payment which is for my exclusive usage, with law enforcement's help if necessary.This is the same complaint about Boston Transition Department.
----Nov. 26th, 2017
11-25-2017 What really confused these wives in this morning's broadcasting?
Heard this morning's confusion about who is who's real husband.
My response: To be accurate, this is "my response"not "my echo". Let me explain why.
I have been harassed for several years that I should "not be allowed" to say I had met this person because the person I met should be another one. I had to clarify every time that I was told what his name is by himself in front of his colleges in Military uniforms.
I had not got certain who is who on this morning's broadcasting yet, but my ears picked up the confusion that one female's husband was the one who got the inheritance, and The Inheritance mentioned is not another one's husband's inheritable. Whose money is this that causes this argument if the two do not share the same father? Why I got this anxious feeling that it sounds like I am in the picture because my inheritance being the confused money in these arguments?
I must emphasize that I got all my inheritances because who my birth lawful father is, my valid lawful inheriting in 2004 got nothing to do with my romance experiences.
I appreciate the announcement from a female saying I have nothing to do with a David Petroves. It is a true statement.
I heard the Tokyo airport charter terminal's romance story in 1975 or so from the Chinese female featured in this morning's broadcasting was with a David Petroves name.
----Nov. 25th, 2017
Heard some questioned what was my assignment on July 1st of 2004 that made me having commanding power.
My response: I do not remember, but I do remember all U.S. Military 5-Stars were there when I made all those requests to Military Supply Corp in a very commanding manner.
----Nov. 25th, 2017
11-24-2017 Why I was recruited a 3-Stars General's rank with commanding power
Heard this morning's broadcasting saying I am the one David Petraeus willing to spend money for.
My response: That is maybe an accurate expression of saying "willing" because it is practically "willing only".
He had paid for a month or so of my medical expense ($500,000 or so) and that amount has been taken from my pre-paid $400 million per year medical expense by his wife Holly Knowlton. And some other incidents are similar to this.
My current pre-paid medical expenses are paid by a check clearly with "investor" printed on it.
I currently only have security and medical big expenses which are all provided by my own money. I appreciate his willingness expression but I have to clarify it is practically a "willingness" only.
What annoyed me is Holly Knowlton's cousins may have taken more of my money from my intellectual incomes. I did call laws help on this annoying matter.
----Nov. 24th, 2017
Heard yesterday's broadcasting about a U.S. Military General's scandalous comment about me.
My response: That comment was from a U.S. Military General who did not know why I could be a combat officer having a 3-Stars Military General's rank at recruiting.
It normally takes a military's combat division personnel 20 years in-service to be promoted to a Military 3-Stars. That is the reason I explained that I was recruited in research division, same as a researcher in Technology Corp or Medical Corp, that always recruited with the Military ranks associated with the level of knowledge in research specialty.
I was recruited as Military Strategist makes me a combat officer because my acknowledged research achievements are on the martial strategy that seeks to answer the question, "How will we win this war?"(Batman, 2015) and studies the specifics of planning for, and engaging in combat, and attempts to reduce the many factors to a set of principles that govern all interactions of the field of battle. (Wikipedia, 2017).
A Military Strategist from research division does have commanding power when on assignment.
----Nov. 24th, 2017
Please refer my explanation on this.
Japanese Military in WWII and U.S. Military in Vietnam War
Military Science and Military Strategy
Batman(2015).Understanding Military Strategy and the Four Levels of War. retrieved from http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/news/a39985/four-levels-of-war/
Wikipedia (2017)/ Military Strategy. retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_science
11-23-2017 All about Military Science and Military Strategist
Heard this morning's argument between two possible real wives who both refused to authorize me a U.S. Military 3-Stars General rank.
My response: I am a not-enlisted U.S. Military 3-Stars General is authorized by U.S. Military, not by any wife to any enlisted U.S. Military personnel, authentic or not.
I am proud I am a U.S. Military 3-Stars General Strategist.
Before I was recruited in January of 2004, the "in-argument authentic real marriage's" possible partner was asked by the recruiter, his colleague, if I was qualified. This may be the reason for this morning's argument about who was sitting there with whom at that moment.
----Nov. 23rd, 2017
Heard the saying of how could it possible that I can have a 3-Stars General's rank by half an hour speech.
My response: It is real that I became a U.S. Military 3-Star General after a half hour speech by being the first person making the point that "Japanese Military was the best-performed military in WWII" at the Strategic level of wars where decisions occur.
I was recruited as a 3-Stars U.S. Military General Strategist in January of 2004. Tons of requests I made to U.S. Military Supply Corps on July 1st of 2004 were made as a U.S. Military 3-Stars General Strategist, a combat officer, to enhance combat effectiveness, not as a technology researcher officer or medical researcher officer.
Military Strategists are mainly practitioners, some are mainly scholars. I think I was recruited as a scholar Military Strategist that "framing the battle space" of Japanese Military in WWII in January of 2004, and I was a practitioner Military Strategist that "evaluating theories, models and perspectives for the artful future application of military and strategic power." on July 1st of 2004.
----Nov. 23rd, 2017
"A major in Military & Strategic Studies prepares you to lead and operate across the spectrum of conflict throughout the world.
MSS majors learn to think as strategists, framing the battle space, and evaluating theories, models and perspectives for the artful future application of military and strategic power."
----retrieved from United Air Force Academy website on Nov. 23rd, 2017 from https://www.usafa.edu/academic/military-strategic-studies/
"There are four levels of warfare. These are the Political, Strategic, Operational, and Tactical levels of war. " (ROBERT BATEMAN, 2015)
----retrieved on Nov. 23rd, 2017 from
http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/news/a39985/four-levels-of-war/
"Military science is the study of military processes, institutions, and behavior, along with the study of warfare, and the theory and application of organized coercive force.[1] It is mainly focused on theory, method, and practice of producing military capability in a manner consistent with national defense policy. Military science serves to identify the strategic, political, economic, psychological, social, operational, technological, and tactical elements necessary to sustain relative advantage of military force; and to increase the likelihood and favorable outcomes of victory in peace or during a war. Military scientists include theorists, researchers, experimental scientists, applied scientists, designers, engineers, test technicians, and other military personnel."
"Military strategy is in many ways the centerpiece of military science. It studies the specifics of planning for, and engaging in combat, and attempts to reduce the many factors to a set of principles that govern all interactions of the field of battle."
----retrieved from Wikipedia website on Nov. 23rd, 2017 from the website: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_science
"A Supply Corps is a branch of a country's military which is in charge of logistics and supply procurement to the armed forces. The term is also used by private corporations but on a much rarer basis.
In the United States armed forces, each branch of service has its own supply corps. The United States Army refers to the organization as the Quartermaster Corps while the U.S. Navy operates a group known as the Navy Supply Corps.
In most militaries, the Supply Corps are considered staff officers meaning that they have no command authority over troops in the field or ships at sea. "
In the United States armed forces, each branch of service has its own supply corps. The United States Army refers to the organization as the Quartermaster Corps while the U.S. Navy operates a group known as the Navy Supply Corps.
In most militaries, the Supply Corps are considered staff officers meaning that they have no command authority over troops in the field or ships at sea. "
----retrieved from Wikipedia website on Nov. 23rd, 2017 from the website:
The effectiveness of a military unit in performing its mission depends on its capabilities (including equipment and personnel) and its ability to use those capabilities.
----retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/topic/combat-effectiveness
Combat Effectiveness composes of Personnel, Equipment, and Training.
Personnel resources include: Strength (Number of Soldiers), Job Qualification(Ability to Perform), Psychological Readiness, Cohesion, and Leadership.
---by T. Owen Jacobs, Joyce L. Shields (1983) "OPERATIONAL DEFINITIONS OF COMBAT UNIT EFFECTIVENESS AND INTEGRITY." U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavior and Social Science. retrieved from http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a136757.pdf.
Improve Combat Effectiveness on Equipment resource has 4 major goals:
- Higher equipment availability to sustain the combat power of small units and networked systems;
- Reduced maintenance “footprint” in maneuver units to improve deployability and operational mobility;
- Reduced equipment maintenance costs to increase investment in future capabilities; and
- Maneuver unit self-sufficiency during combat pulses to enable them to leverage information dominance through enhanced mobility.
----by Army Research Division: Rand Arroyo Center (2003). "Improved Equipment Sustainment Is Critical to Army Transformation". retrieved from https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_briefs/2005/RB3039.pdf
----Nov. 23rd, 2017
11-22-2017 The U.S. military is the Authority on U.S. Military matters, not a housewife.
Heard this morning's "impossible a 3-stars General" angry confrontation from a housewife.
My response: I am a 3-stars U.S. Military General, Strategist not enlisted. This was validated by a U.S. military spokesperson on the radio program on Oct. 11th or Nov. 8th, 2017 or so when my lifetime achievements were acknowledged. That is the reason I am authorized by U.S. Military to wear U.S. Military 3-stars General's Service Dress Uniforms.
I advise this housewife, who may be very prominent in the People's Republic of China, to hold her tongue on who should be the authority on U.S. military matters.
*3-stars U.S. Military General, a Strategist not enlisted.
退役三星将军参谋长。
*A Strategist is a combat research position, not a technology or medical research position.
参谋长属战斗部队编制军衔而非科技或医学研究编制军衔。
*A Strategist is a combat officer, not a supply officer.
参谋长是战斗部队将官，不是后勤部队将官。
----Nov. 22nd, 2017
About "Lined-up" marriage and its bow loop.
My response: A lined-up marriage is a term referring to some married couples that grouped by father another man's wife's child or mother another woman's husband's child. No child shared between married husband and wife.
It has weird bow rule that father of the child bow to the husband of the child's mother; and the mother of the child bow to the wife of the child's father.
And any husband or wife in any sequential number of marriage in this "lined-up marriage" can be a doggie bottom if the marriage partner is the need-to-bow-to and two adjacent marriage are coping willingly or not willing to make this husband or wife a bow only.
The Father of the Child -------->
Husband 1 -> Husband2 -> Husband 3->Husband4->Husband5
↓ ⇈
Above: Illustrating that the Doggie Bottom is Wife 3
<-------The Mother of the Child
In this loop, wife 3 need t bow to her own husband in her marriage, father of her child (husband 2) cannot help her because he needs to bow, for some reason, to his wife in his own marriage as well, and mother of her husband's child is not willing to bow to her because father of her child (husband 3) is this wife 3 bows to and willing to spoil her (wife 4).
The Father of the Child -------->
Husband 1 -> Husband2 -> Husband 3->Husband4->Husband5
⇊ ↑
Above: Illustrating that the Doggie Bottom is Husband 3
<-------The Mother of the Child
In this loop, Husband3 need t bow to his own wife in his marriage, mother of his child (wife 4) cannot help him because she needs to bow to her husband, for some reason, in her own marriage as well, and father of his wife's child is not willing to bow to him because mother of his child (wife 3) is this husband3 bows to and willing to support him (husband2).
I screamed out loud in 2015 that I was a doggie bottom because of this "line-up marriage" just by rumors. I refused to be that wife 3 in this illustration loop just by rumors. I refuse.
I just wonder why any financial well-being male or female would willing to be in this doggie bottom?
----Nov. 22nd, 2017
11-21-2017 All about name confusions
Heard this morning's broadcasting reflected confusion of David Petrovis and David Petraeus,
My Response: David Petraeus is the U.S. Army General who I met at a Hyatt Regional's lobby in Washington area in 2003.
David Petrovis is the person with a family name I respect hugely. There are more than several young Davids from this respectful Petrovis name in the U.S. currently, and I heard this one is currently dating a Chinese female whose disputes with me about the one I met was featured on the radio program a couple of months ago.
I have to make my response like what was featured this morning. I am not willing to be the subject of constant challenges, insults, and demands of financial providing* out of jealousy, competitiveness from this name confusion. This has been my complaints regarding Ford name.
* I do not know how Chinese communities have this weird illusion that a sexual relationship between a female and a male should mean provided by me, like the psycho-like requests "I told you I never wanted her, Why can't I spend her money" as you heard from their National leaders on the radio program. I just kept saying "I refuse."
----Nov. 21st, 2017
Heard sayings reflected from this morning's broadcasting about my investment in a respectful company.
My response: That is still my money still investing in the same respectful company, but as an investor is addressed. This may be the reason for these rumors.
----Nov. 21st, 2017
About my complaints regarding Ford name confusions.
My response: I reacted because these name confusions, if intended to produce a show, has not been well-managed to ensure my life would not be impacted. I have concerned my children have been exposed to hatred alike reactions from this intentional name confusions.
I did inform the law enforcement about possible hate crime and sexual harassment intended in producing as well as promoting this radio program this way.
----Nov. 21st, 2017
About my being the heir of my own family.
My response: Entertainment industry's college graduated females often have opportunities to be invited into luxury life by a business person or a rich prominent person they associate with from work. The wonderful feeling of growing into luxury may have contributed the saying of "hang on to breast & butt attraction".
I am the major featured person in this radio program but I am not an entertainment professional. I met these attractive great prominent males, but I was not into their luxury life by my sexual activities. I am having the same financial comfortableness as those great prominent males that provided by my own maiden birth grandfathers' blessing so that I do not need to practice sexual attraction to have a wonderful luxury life.
I was brought up by the expectation of being an heir to run a house as the head of the house, not the expectation of running a house as a housewife. There are doubts why my current financial situation is so thrift, but that is my decision for some good reasons out of my characters of "not willing to see my money not spent on myself as I wish". No matter what doubts might be there, I know my money is mine to spend as I wish after this "hard time".
I am not the person willing to be competed by breast & butts attractions for luxury, and I am not the person interested in housewives' talks of everybody's romances. I have been fed up all this time with all these name confusions and insist-on accusing me being a stuck-on to this or that prominent male.
I won't be the person a bit afraid of this or that prominent name to hold my tongue when I am insulted by their associated females, and I won't hesitate to take legal actions when I see intolerable.
----Nov. 21st, 2017
11-20-2017 Some more confusions about agreed-upon-providing
Heard this morning's talk of an Ambassador.
My response: Heard the rumor that her personal life plan is the reason she was promoted to be an Ambassador. I was surprised because an Ambassador is a public post to represent the government even without a paycheck.
Heard her personal life plan is to be wanted by a U.S. citizen rich man. Heard her personal life plan can only be achieved by letting my children without their father. Heard her personal life plan was helped by those pathetic-s who are so proud all they can do and all they good at is to mix-and-match human beings' sexual activities.
I won't be the person can hold my tongue on this matter, and I won't be the person would be confused who should be called the troublemaker on this matter, and I won't be the person so afraid of facing these insults.
I did inform law enforcement about possible prostitution business involvement on this matter.
----Nov. 20th, 2017
Heard some confusion about agreed-upon-providing.
My response: Agreed-upon-providing is not attorney fee. It was the agreed-upon-support that provided to those devoted to serve the countries that also having a family to support at the time when serving the countries means no personal income. This agreed-upon-providing(agreed-upon-support) is in process of stopping.
My inheritance that has been providing this agreed-upon-providing (agreed-upon-support) was not a client to those being-provided-for because of this agreed-upon-providing (agreed-upon-support).
My inheritance that has been providing this agreed-upon-providing (agreed-upon-support) is not a client to those being-provided-for's family-owned-attorney-business because of this agreed-upon-providing (agreed-upon-support).
This explanation is to all my inheritances.
I, Min Fang, was not a client to those being-provided-for because of this agreed-upon-providing (agreed-upon-support).
I, Min Fang, is not a client to those being-provided-for's family-owned-attorney-business because of this agreed-upon-providing (agreed-upon-support).
----Nov. 20th, 2017
Heard saying why side lines are also provided(supported) for by this agreed-upon-providing(agreed-upon-support).
My response: My inheritance fund only responsible for transferring agreed-upon amount of support one-installment per year as agreed-upon to the one-and-only bank account number owned by the provided(supported)-for-family as agreed-upon. It is purely their own family financial matters beyond this.
----Nov. 20th, 2017
Reference Link: 11-15-2017 I own my claimed wealth lawfully is Validated （“我和中国政府的矛盾”附后）
My inherited wealth are all entrusted before the People's Republic of China even exists.
My investments outside the People's Republic of China are never any charities or donations from the People's Republic of China.
My investments in the People's Republic of China are all lawful investments that conduct lawful business and pay required taxes according to U.S. laws and People's Republic of China's laws.
----Published on Nov. 19th, 2017
11-19-2017 Child Trafficking is a Huge Crime in the United States and In the People's Republic of China（贩卖儿童在美国及在中华人民共和国都是严重犯罪行为）
Heard this morning's shocking proud of abusing 4500 children to get money.
My response: What I heard is these children are "organized to be imported into" United States just to help somebody fulfilled the ambition "to let me pay for it". They are now, by rumor, in the United States without their parents' accompany and intended to stay on "regular business donations".
I did inform law enforcement about this shocking child trafficking announcement from what I heard what was broadcasted this morning on the radio program.
I did express myself that I refuse to be the victim of this organized larceny crimes through business spending.
I did express myself that I refuse to let my money into any criminal business like so.
I did express myself that I refuse to let anyone who is determined to abuse managerial power or work-power to have the opportunities to let my money involved in crimes including these crimes to make myself a victim as well.
I did express myself that I refuse to pay for these children and I refuse to provide for these children.
----Nov. 19th, 2017
Heard these children are trafficked from the People's Republic of China with this Chinese government's help.
My response: My inherited wealth are all entrusted before the People's Republic of China even exists.
My investments outside the People's Republic of China are never any charities or donations from the People's Republic of China.
My investments in the People's Republic of China are all lawful investments that conduct lawful business and pay required taxes according to U.S. laws and People's Republic of China's laws.
According to the People's Republic of China's laws, Chinese citizens' children are those children's own parents' obligations to raise or the People's Republic of China's government's obligation to help to raise.
I, Min Fang, refuse to be the victim of this organized crime that intends to spend or use my money without my willingness.
----Nov. 19th, 2017
Heard these children are "imported" with some special help.
My response: I did inform law enforcement about this.
I also informed law enforcement about rumors that this radio program's producing effort is to get my money without my own willingness and rumors about my medical treatment that you heard on the radio.
And I did express myself to the law enforcement that I refuse to be the victim.
I did clarify some reasons that caused confusion of ownership regarding my inherited wealth. I do not know what else is so confusing other than some financial desires that I consider inappropriate.
----Nov. 19th, 2017
Heard some said that if I intend to be cured of my glass house cancer, I best to keep quiet no matter what I hear.
My response: That is very and very hard for me. I am already staying very, very calm so that I have not shoot like a rocket every time.
And I won't request special arrangement to help me hear these because I already called laws help.
----Nov. 19th, 2017
11-18-2017 2007 July Stadium Event
Heard this morning's broadcasting of "July Stadium Wedding" event.
My response: As explained this morning, event participants (Bride and Groom) or wedding organizer were all never associate with me romantically. Heard there was over 1000 in-person attendee. I was a name-attendee of the event that was introduced by over 400 voice-attendee of the event. Heard there was over 1000 take-part-in-person-attendee that celebrated the event that day at the stadium. This morning's broadcasting was not a replay of that 2007's event. This morning's broadcasting was a 10-years celebration of the 2007 event with about 500 voice-attendee that includes 100 new choir members.
----Nov. 18th, 2017
Heard this morning's explanation of why producing this radio program using editing techniques that used in Oscar movie "crash".
My response: I agree that this radio program had been this popular and phenomena in U.S. and in the entire world as reflected by this morning's explanation. This radio program has been a great achievement that presented producers' great talents. Hope this morning's explanation can bring out more explanations with positive intentions.
----Nov. 18th, 2017
Heard there was some confusion when I was born.
My response: I was born in 1967 as broadcasted in 2006 or so. The confusion is from Chinese version that broadcasted 1971. It was Chinese version only and I do not know who is this 1971-born. No such person associated with me as far as I know. Heard it was concluded a producing mistake in 2006 in China.
----Nov. 18th, 2017
Heard some confusion if I provide for my parents and why same equally
My response: I do provide for them same equally as decided on July 1st of 2004.
My inherited wealth was from my father side grandfathers' blessing. But I am a biological daughter to both of my parents, not an in-law. And I was raised by both of my parents. Of course, I provide for my parents same equally if that is my money, and I do consider my inheritance is my money.
I do not think I have any money-anchor child who has parents that do not include me deserve to be provided for same equally by my money. And I do my best never put any child carries my blood to be in that situation.
----Nov. 18th, 2017
11-17-2017 About some frustrations expressed in this morning's broadcasting
Heard this morning's confrontation from O'Connors.
My response: Heard O'Connors decided to leave it as it is. Let me explain what this is about here.
It was about what I published yesterday. The reason I published so yesterday is that some O'Connors declared either I am not allowed to say that I own the fund or they need to validate how I own the fund. I understood it as they either try to block me from spending my own money or try to dig out all bank accounts information. So, as you heard this morning, O'Connors were fighting that I can't include all O'Connors which is about 200 and I was explaining "there are more than one O'Connor to make it necessary to append an 's' there". And as you heard this morning, O'Connors decided to leave the following as it is:
What I published yesterday:
O'Connors never own that fund, it is not O'Connors' to say, and it is not O"Connors' to validate, and it is not O'Connors' to confront regarding anything about that fund.
This is the same to all my inheritances.
O'Connors' never own that fund, their family wealth confusion is not the reason to demand any paying checks or providing from that fund, and no one should use O'Connors' family wealth confusion to demand any paying checks or providing through O'Connors' family wealth confusion. This is the same to all my inheritances.
----Published on Nov. 16th, 2017
----Nov. 17th, 2017
Heard this morning's frustration about why I am not willing to give her my money knowing she is his wife.
My response: I am a female resident of Massachusetts, U.S and I am an heir of a long history polygamists' family, but I am not a gay or a lesbian and I am not interested in her. That is not to mention a polygamist never share a marriage partner.
It is her beloved and devoted husband that she should ask everything she deserved, she should never ask anything desirable to herself from a female she publicly shitted as "unwanted, disgusted to her husband".
Any request from herself that is to request me to shit herself all over freely in all possible ways, which has to be my shared understanding of "shit herself all over freely", will be my pleasure to cooperate. This is the only request that I am willing to hear from her.
*Massachusetts of United States is the first state in the whole world has lawfully same-sex marriage.
----Nov. 17th, 2017
Heard this morning's arguments, about above points I expressed, from those wives who are certain I have nothing to do with their wives.
My response: That is my frustrated curiosity why it is their business to be so agitated about some romance issues of some man else? Why it is their business to participate in this fight for an underwear of some man else? Even this or that person is associated with these wives, but that person is not supposed to be a man to these wives for them to fight for that person's underwear.
And that did spark a lot of rumors of who they are to this or that man on romance. And that did cause me express my anger loudly "Who the XXXX do you think you are?"
----Nov. 17th, 2017
11-16-2017 Proud to be My Father's Daughter carry My Father's Blood
Heard this morning's arguments about confusion why I still say that is my money.
My response: That is my money because I inherited it and because it is validated according to U.S. laws that my inheriting on June 30th of 2004 is legally valid.
I am a U.S. citizen since June of 2015. All my inherited were entrusted before the People's Republic of China was born in 1949.
It is not People's Republic of China's saying or confrontation of anything regarding my inheritances.
O'Connors never own that fund, it is not O'Connors' to say, and it is not O"Connors' to validate, and it is not O'Connors' to confront regarding anything about that fund.
This is the same to all my inheritances.
O'Connors' never own that fund, their family wealth confusion is not the reason to demand any paying checks or providing from that fund, and no one should use O'Connors' family wealth confusion to demand any paying checks or providing through O'Connors' family wealth confusion. This is the same to all my inheritances.
----Nov. 16th, 2017
Heard the saying why I have problems with Chinese Chairman Xi's announced family plan.
My response: I do not care a bit how he is going to have his family.
I am not willing to provide for his family or whoever he wants to share his life with. I refused to be threatened to provide for his family or whoever he wants to share his life with, and I refused to be shit all over because I refused to provide for his family or whoever he wants to share his life with.
*Rumored, according to Chinese Chairman Xi's announced family plan on the radio program, Chinese Premier's wife (Cheng, Hong 程虹) who is also the mother of Chinese Chairman Xi's only child (an adult son) is the person that Chinese Chairman Xi intends to share his life with.
*Both Chinese Chairman Xi and Chinese Premier have very high income and privileges in the People's Republic of China, both are￥100,000/month.
* Rumored the same female they both devoted to love also have been devotedly loved by several other Chinese senior government officials who also have very high incomes and privileges in the People's Republic of China. Rumored it is verified she has mothered 4 adult children from them, one each. Rumored this administration is the administration that "should be blessed by her fertility capability". Rumored she has two more adult children have not been verified fathered by whom yet.
*Rumored 程虹(Cheng, Hong) was graduated from a foreign language college (University) and had been a faculty of the same college (University).
----Nov. 16th, 2017
Heard the confrontation of Scientists from Chinese Science Academy.
My response: That has been my screams towards Chinese diplomats who are graduated from foreign language colleges (universities) or a foreign language majored in some colleges (universities). Those Chinese diplomats have insisted on to judge the level of my Computer Science knowledge by their foreign language knowledge.
This morning, as you heard on the radio, these Scientists from Chinese Science Academy who majored in Astrophysics (天体物理) or Geophysics (地球物理). This is my father's major and Chinese Science Academy had been the place my father had worked for over 30 years till he retired.
I assume the points from China, as you heard this morning, is to say that these people know for sure my father never had any professional achievements at all to express that this is how this administration of Chinese government know that it is impossible I can have any achievements in Computer Science just being his daughter.
I assumed my father is not feeling great at this hour. Heard he is also a U.S. citizen now. Heard this is not the first time. My father was enrolled in surveying and mapping school of the Chinese People's Liberation Army (原中国人民解放军测绘学校, currently named PLA Academy of Surveying and Mapping. 现中国人民解放军测绘学院）when he was enlisted in 1950. I heard somebody from this current Academy made a similar comment last year in the same radio program.
My father got his bachelor's degree in Astrophysics majored from Nanjing University(南京大学数天系） where he enrolled after he was no longer enlisted.
I do not know how huge they are without any borrowing some intellectual properties efforts.
* Rumored they are the people knew if I have an adult child by birth. I say U.S. law enforcement can do a verification check on U.S. satellite's records to see if it is possible I could hide 10-months-pregnancy when I was a college student lived in an 8-person dorm or when I was having a full-time job.
* Rumored they are the people knew if my father has a pre-marriage daughter who is mothered by one of them. I say U.S. law enforcement can do a verification check on U.S. satellite's records to see if it was possible a female could be seeded without any physical contacts in People's Republic of China before 1967. I was born in 1967.
----Nov. 16th, 2017
11-15-2017 I own my claimed wealth lawfully is Validated （“我和中国政府的矛盾”附后）
Heard this morning's validation if my inheriting on June 30th of 2004 is legally valid.
My response: Big Thanks to the United States Supreme Court Judge who validated my inheriting on June 30th of 2004 is legally valid. Yes. Yes. Yes. Big Thanks.
----Nov. 15th, 2017
Heard the same U.S. Supreme Court Judge said he is not the person to say if I can own it all.
My response: Yes, of course. I own it all is by my grandfathers' wills.
----Nov. 15th, 2017
Heard the saying to vote to spend my money.
My response: That is from imaginable frustration. By U.S. laws, my wealth is my private wealth which is not eligible for this "vote to spend".
----Nov. 15th, 2017
Heard the saying of concerns if applicable investor taxes can be appropriately paid.
My response: Please inform IRS about why you are concerned. I informed law enforcement about my concerns how my investor taxes are paid.
----Nov. 15th, 2017
Heard the saying of concerns regarding if my providing checks can be lawfully valid to be cashed.
My response: Those checks are paid lawfully per those funds' known legal owner's request or known legal owner's lawful representative's requests. Regarding if I can be the beneficiaries of those paying checks, please inform the law enforcement about all your concerns instead of any accounting departments that receiving these checks. Those paying checks are all lawfully signed valid checks.
You will be sued if you insist on harassing any accounting departments to block me to be provided for by those lawfully signed and legally valid paying checks.
You will be sued for criminal activities if you insist on harassing any accounting departments to block my financial providing from those lawfully signed and legally valid paying checks because of your sexual activities or because your sexual intentions have nothing to do with me.
----Nov. 15th, 2017
The difference between Validating, Ruling and Voting.
My response: Validating is to verify some information according to the laws.
The ruling is to give a Judge's decision on the case the Judge is handling.
Voting is to make a decision on a matter as a group.
This morning, as you heard on the radio, the information about if my inheriting on June 30th of 2004 is valid has been validated by a Supreme Court Judge according to U.S. laws to be legally valid.
My inheriting on June 30th of 2004 was never a case in any U.S. court.
My inheriting on June 30th of 2004 was never a U.S. Supreme Court case as you heard on the radio.
----Nov. 15th, 2017
Heard saying why according U.S.laws when I was a People's Republic of China's citizen in 2004.
My response: I heard the explanation has given as my inheriting on June 30th of 2004 happened on U.S. soil.
I have been a U.S. resident since October of 1996. On June 30th of 2004, I inherited my wealth in a law office in Connecticut, United States.
I became a U.S. citizen since June of 2015.
----Nov. 15th, 2017
我和中国政府的矛盾。
我指责中国政府就财产所有权指手画脚，完全无视方敏的合法利益。
中华人民共和国法律和美国法律在信托及遗产继承的相关法律就方敏的法律权益是完全不相冲突的。
方敏所继承的海外信托财产都是中华人民共和国成立之前就已经信托的，而中华人民共和国这一届政府却以仅仅68岁的共和国的名义对方敏所继承财产就是一副“就是够资格强行掠夺，至少是说了算”的嘴脸是造成方敏和中国政府矛盾的根本原因。（*方敏所继承财产的财产信托年纪都超过中华人民共和国的年纪。）
而中国政府一再以所谓表演方式演出造谣诋毁，谩骂羞辱方敏的内容，以及就这些财产的所有权公开宣称不准方敏拥有是造成方敏今天早上痛骂中华人民共和国这一届政府“根本是一群没有家教的婊子养的，鹞子货（妓女货）”的原因。
----2017年11月15日。
就今天早上中国政府所表达“只要我敢在痛骂中提到习近平的孩子亲妈及李克强的妻子程虹是个鹞子货，是个破鞋，习近平李克强就会下令中国军队对我开枪开炮杀人“的立场。
我的回应：我是美国公民，中华人民共和国这一届政府为什么需要通过程虹的屁股来组成和我没有任何关系。
就我听到的海外传言：这一届政府是在充分清楚程虹和所有这一届国家领导人的利益关系之后才组成的（所育小孩都是现已成年的）。也就是程虹的屁股是这一届政府能够繁荣昌盛中国的原因--也就是因为程虹才是一个会生的屁股。
海外传言:中华人民共和国的这一届政府可能是选举电脑计票舞弊的结果。
海外传言：中华人民共和国一直就有为了一个女人的屁股用中国人民解放军的枪支子弹屠杀人民的传统。中华人民共和国在1966前后的武斗就是起源于中国人民解放军公然为了北京街头的光屁股女人对中国平民百姓开枪。
我是美国公民，任何美国政府官员参与安排及协调让中华人民共和国的解放军军人对我开枪开炮，都是违反美国法律的谋杀行为，如果Tina O'Connor或她的亲友以美国官员身份参与，都是企图谋财害命的行为。
----2017年11月15日。
我指责中国政府就财产所有权指手画脚，完全无视方敏的合法利益。
中华人民共和国法律和美国法律在信托及遗产继承的相关法律就方敏的法律权益是完全不相冲突的。
方敏所继承的海外信托财产都是中华人民共和国成立之前就已经信托的，而中华人民共和国这一届政府却以仅仅68岁的共和国的名义对方敏所继承财产就是一副“就是够资格强行掠夺，至少是说了算”的嘴脸是造成方敏和中国政府矛盾的根本原因。（*方敏所继承财产的财产信托年纪都超过中华人民共和国的年纪。）
而中国政府一再以所谓表演方式演出造谣诋毁，谩骂羞辱方敏的内容，以及就这些财产的所有权公开宣称不准方敏拥有是造成方敏今天早上痛骂中华人民共和国这一届政府“根本是一群没有家教的婊子养的，鹞子货（妓女货）”的原因。
----2017年11月15日。
就今天早上中国政府所表达“只要我敢在痛骂中提到习近平的孩子亲妈及李克强的妻子程虹是个鹞子货，是个破鞋，习近平李克强就会下令中国军队对我开枪开炮杀人“的立场。
我的回应：我是美国公民，中华人民共和国这一届政府为什么需要通过程虹的屁股来组成和我没有任何关系。
就我听到的海外传言：这一届政府是在充分清楚程虹和所有这一届国家领导人的利益关系之后才组成的（所育小孩都是现已成年的）。也就是程虹的屁股是这一届政府能够繁荣昌盛中国的原因--也就是因为程虹才是一个会生的屁股。
海外传言:中华人民共和国的这一届政府可能是选举电脑计票舞弊的结果。
海外传言：中华人民共和国一直就有为了一个女人的屁股用中国人民解放军的枪支子弹屠杀人民的传统。中华人民共和国在1966前后的武斗就是起源于中国人民解放军公然为了北京街头的光屁股女人对中国平民百姓开枪。
我是美国公民，任何美国政府官员参与安排及协调让中华人民共和国的解放军军人对我开枪开炮，都是违反美国法律的谋杀行为，如果Tina O'Connor或她的亲友以美国官员身份参与，都是企图谋财害命的行为。
----2017年11月15日。
11-14-2017 All About DNA test
Heard this morning's talk about DNA test result resemblance of 97%, 99% and etc.
My response: DNA resemblance is like following, same if do a mother side DNA test.
Father and son (daughter) > 99%
Siblings from same both parents > 98%
Half Siblings >97%
Father's siblings (from same both parents) and son(daughter) > 97%
Father's half-siblings and son(daughter) > 96%
Grandfather and grandson (granddaughter) > 98%
Grandfather's siblings (from same both parents) and grandson(granddaughter) > 96%
Grandfather's half-siblings and grandson(granddaughter) > 95%
First cousin > 96%
Second cousin > 95%
Third cousin > 94%
...
Heard this morning said the girl of the published video in 2012 is DNA test resemblance > 99% with me. That is my biological daughter who resembles my appearance. I am after my ancient grandfather and ancient beauty grandmother in appearance, I do not really resemble my parents or my younger brother in appearance, and I do not resemble any of my cousins in appearance.
----Nov 14th, 2017
Heard the girl lives with a "British Nanny" is DNA test resemblance > 97% with me. This is a puzzle.
My response: Heard the girl lives with a "British Nanny" is DNA test > 99% resemble of her birth mother.
Heard her birth mother is, at least, a couple of years younger than me (born in 1967), my grandfather past away in 1965 who certainly was not the person fathered her birth mother.
Heard her birth mother's DNA test result shows, that her birth mother is not my half-sibling or first cousin. This means her birth mother is not my father's or my father's siblings' child.
Her DNA test result is a puzzle. Her rumored resemblance to me is not nature resemblance.
----Nov 14th, 2017
How a child only carry 10% Chinese Gene can be mothered by a Chinese through DNA test verification?
My response: DNA test uses DNA Gene codes located in some certain regions on DNA twist to do the DNA test comparison. This is for parents’ DNA comparison, and for regional Gene comparison.
There are some customary parents’ comparison testing regions, but not necessarily the only comparable regions.
The customary parents' comparison DNA test regions are, just like Chinese Gene regions, regions that very characteristic enough to do the meaningful comparison. Those regions are not necessarily the only available regions can do the meaningful comparison, but these customary regions are universal comparable regions to almost all DNA test. Other regions that also comparable are case by case located on DNA twists individually.
A child mothered by a 100% Chinese can have only 10% Chinese gene may because of nature DNA fission in characteristic Chinese Gene comparable regions on DNA twists, or because of some DNA testing related reason. The DNA test puzzled 97% resemblance that mentioned above may also out of similar reasons.
----Nov 14th, 2017
11-13-2017 New Treatment Technology to Completely Cure Cancer --Proudly being the first person suggested How to Completely Cure Cancers
Heard this morning's talk about new Cancer Treatment.
My response: This is the technology that uses laser power to 100% completely Cure Cancer, not some 5 years survival rate that needs to be collected through this treatment program promotion, but the rate of Complete Cured Cancers.
As broadcast by the radio program this morning, Eligibility for a cancer patient to participate depends on an oncologist's diagnose, no matter what the stage is but what the type of cancer is, and special Abbreviation of the treatment technology.
I had published this special Abbreviation on my school Blackboard this semester and last semester, with the surgery rate that is so impressively affordable (not covered by insurance). I am currently enrolled in an MBA program offered by a west coast University.
No matter what current cancer stage is or locations are, be original or spread, the patient can be cured 100% completely.
----Nov. 13th, 2017
The difference between new treatment technology and chemo.
My Response: Following are the reasons a special Abbreviation code is needed to enroll in this treatment.
----Nov. 13th, 2017
The difference between an Oncologist, a cancer researcher, a bio-medical engineer and me.
My response:
An Oncologist is a medical doctor (diagnose), a surgical doctor (scalpel surgery or this new technology surgery), or a radiant doctor (chemo or this new technology surgery) who can diagnose if a patient has cancer and what type of cancer, can remove cancer from patient through scalpel surgery or chemosurgery or this new technology surgery, and can help cancer patient to recover.
A Cancer Researcher is a researcher specialized on how to target cancer infected cells accurately to be used by Hemodialysis ( Adsorbing Carbon rod blood filtering technology).
A biomedical engineer is an engineer to design and to develop those medical diagnostic or treatment equipment and devices, such as artificial internal organs, replacements for body parts, and those machines for diagnosing medical problems or for providing medical treatments.
I am the person having a Master degree in Computer Science and a Bachelor degree in Pharmacology major that came with education on Basic Medical System.
I contributed to this new Cancer treatment technology by I am being the first person suggested using Hemodialysis ( Adsorbing Carbon rod blood filtering technology) for several times to prevent spreading. It is from my Basic Medical System knowledge.
I also contributed to this new Cancer treatment technology on how to improve research-oriented laser treatment technology (instruments and devices ) to clinic-usage treatment technology. It is from my Computer Science knowledge.
----Nov. 13th, 2017
11-12-2017 A Scheme? -- Root cause of "Pay for whoever's sexual activities"
Heard this morning's broadcasting about "no association with.."
My response: I did accuse them of something.
I accused them why they arranged to make me pay for someone's sexual activities that they said it was to settle a remarried family. This has been everybody's frustration, at least this has been what I feel like, why I have been refusing to provide for whoever's marriage-related sexual activities, and it has been my serious complains why I need to pay for whoever's sexual activities for almost 3 years.
Heard that their arrangements were the starters of this "pay for whoever's marriage-related sexual activities" as you heard on the radio this morning, at least one of which was out of the judgment prompted by the phone call they received from the "NYC Duane Reade pharmacist Lizzette" as you heard on the radio in the morning.
----Nov 12th, 2017
11-11-2017 Controversial intentionally caused by Sexual Harassment from The Big Names' Associated
Heard this morning's a woman's claim that she is sharing a man.
My response: That is not a man can be associated with me for that female to make such a claim on my radio program.
I am financially much wealthier, that is no comparison wealthier, than the male or the male's family that is claimed, I have much glory family name and family history to share with my children, I have no such need to be associated with any female's shared penis. This is a disgusting illusion to fancy a male can be shared just because he is unwanted.
My children have no obligation or responsibility to be associated with the male that was claimed a shared one, whoever the male is. I refuse to let this female or the male she claimed to have any association with my children.
----Nov. 11th, 2017
Heard this morning's some O'Connors efforts of confusing who do or do not share.
My response: Do not know if those O'Connors are decent O'Connor named.
Because of all these efforts to confuse who deserve to own a penis, or who deserves to be the better production of the penis. Plus the efforts of writing "legal documentation" to own my biological children for demanding money and providing purpose, I say:
Nowadays, O'Connor name only means shit, disgusting and"Who the FUCK they think they are".
Not sure if this morning's effort is to ensure I can get stuck in these lies after all these insults, or it is the effort to decent O'Connor's name a bit, at least, not a sick, pathetic psycho's synonym.
*Luckily, I am a pharmacologist can do a DNA test by my own hands.
----Nov. 11th, 2017
11-10-2017 This morning's August Born Child is a Sneak-In Illegitimate Cheap Born
Heard about this morning's August born Child.
My response: This sneak-in illegitimate child is from a relative to an investor of Macy's. I did not know a daughter from that house can be this cheap. I am just being honest about what I heard and how I feel.
Like I made myself very clear if this is indeed from the person I do mind very much, I have no problem to tell that I also heard his birth mother already divorced, and his father already has a younger child. And I have no problem to say if it is his father is that Senior being arrested, I have no problem since I have no obligation, no responsibility and no need to mention that person at all. And I have no problem to be happy the person that I minded very much actually ended up with a sneak-in child and possibly no-inheritable but a shit like his birth mother.
Some say this is so insulting, I say "Great after all they have done to support all these insults to me. I will let my children know everything that happened made them shit-like to the public who know them, by factual evidence. And I am determined to return all these insults back to everyone that laws can't apply justice appropriately, and I have no problem to return these insults forever till I feel I have made myself feel justified".
By the way, I probably sued them "Murder for Money" already if all these are true stories. I figured that either daughters from this family are this cheap need to sneak-in a child to have some money or it is their Murder Attempt to kill me for my money.
----Nov, 10th, 2017
About Macy's Investor.
My response: I was treated nicely and respectfully in that broadcasted Macy's Thanksgiving parade when my parents were in New York City with me in 2000.
Heard Macy's is from the same investment of Lehman Brother's that I am currently provided for, a 400 years' old or so French Fund.
Boston downtown crossing location Macy's store's recent renovation that removed its Bathrooms and its kitchenware department sparked a lot of sayings.
Almost everyone in Boston, MA knows that I like to visit its kitchenware department and use its bathroom if I am in Boston Downtown area.
If there are no such stories on the radio, I would defend that is irrelevant because I already seldom go there since March of this year. But with this story of August born child, I am being very honest about what happened and what I heard.
----Nov. 10th, 2017
About Lehman Brother's Investor's family.
My response: Heard the investor has daughters who already married in 2004 and still in same marriages.
Heard their marriage have some situations because of 2004's meeting which has nothing to do with romance nature that I may need to do my sincere apology.
----Nov. 10th, 2017
Heard Chinese government is working on to have a saying over the ownership of this French Fund.
My response: This fund has been out of China at least for 400 years already. This 400 is over 5 times age of 68 years' old of People's Republic of China. It is Chinese culture to tell them "Shut the fuck up, who the Fuck do you think you are. You must be the whore-born that don't have parents to provide family education to teach you to shut the fuck up." This is totally 100% according to Chinese culture that only whore-borns don't learn shut-up from parents.
By the way, this French Fund has a parent fund as well, the same as the fund cause O'Connors confusion has a British Fund.
----Nov. 10th, 2017
A post I published somewhere regarding this "I came from China, I know".
My response: Not meant to insult anyone, but I have to let everyone to understand my frustration and curiosity a bit regarding this "I am a Chinese" knowledge of my private wealth. Can you ask your Chinese colleague or your Chinese friend why being Chinese from the People's Republic of China can be so authority on my achievements during my 20 years in U.S. time, and how a People's Republic of China's citizen can be so authority on American Fund's ownership? My family had to entrust all family wealth abroad before China became Communism country in 1949 that Communism certainly means seize all private wealth. Why is it so hard to understand for everyone having a Chinese passport? Everyone having or had a Chinese Passport knows that's what happened to everyone's private wealth in the 1950s in the People's Republic of China. What knowledge can a Chinese passport grant on if I have my private wealth inherited outside China?
* Only my grandfather may have entrusted every penny abroad. My great-grandfather, one of the donors who supported Chinese colleges, passed away in 1930 that he may not have expected China could be a communist country.
----Nov. 10th, 2017