About Radio Program (XI) ----关于广播剧（十一）
Chinese version
-
Chronicle Note
**I have not heard one single episode of this radio program myself for a lot of reasons. To do a radio program majorly featuring me was discussed on 07/01/2004 conference call. The radio program has been produced by United States 106.7FM or Clear Channel and on air since 2005??suppose??. I am a Chinese, the major featured person(suppose). Following are what I gathered from impacts of being the major featured person and may not correct. Please contact me at somebodyinMA@gmail.com if the content is seriously incorrect and please provide references including broadcasting channel and time, thanks forward.
老爸爸方文海，你其实是被我给信托了， 我所信托的财产很安全，你也很安全，请尽快和我联系，或者联系南京紫台025-8333-2227，请赶紧和美国领事馆联系(任何地方的美领馆， 上海021-8011-2400），不用担心你是否有有效证件证明身份，他们可以做DNA鉴定来确定你和我的亲生父女关系的。如果老爸爸你因为自己的亲身经历，想在国内找找妈妈王博贤的消息，也最好是在和美国领事馆核实妈妈是否已经在美国之后，或者至少和我方敏取得联系之后，再一起商量商量如何找妈妈并和妈妈取得联系。紫金山天文台http://www.pmo.cas.cn/ztjj/lxfs/
致上海公司律师：只有我亲生父亲方文海所持律师信件才有可能是有效律师信件，2004年7月1日我办理我的财产信托时就是这么要求这份差别的。已经是有了这么大的差别之后，我的八旬父亲方文海还是于2013年10月被赶出了他自己的家门。我母亲应该于2004年7月2日起应该有一份她的退休金规模的由我提供的月供，但我不知具体是如何给付的。----2018年4月13日
老爸爸：你可以用图书馆的电脑，注册一个电邮地址，只要你觉得在网上发表这个电邮地址很安全，你就可以用这个电邮地址和我联系，我可以申请让你搬来麻州波士顿(Boston) 亨廷頓大道上的(Huntington Avenue)的东北大学(North Eastern University）以及温特沃斯理工学院(Wentworth College)的附近和我同住, 再远一点就是Museum of Fine Arts, Boston( 地址：465 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115)，波士顿地铁: Orange Line (Ruggles Station),走出这个地铁站，你要么在东北大学里，要么不知该往哪走，要么你走走就已经知道我大概住哪里了，就只是哪栋楼了，我住的是公屋（BHA, 2494)。https://chroniclenote.blogspot.com/
我的电邮：somebodyinMA@gmail.com, somebodyInBoston@gmail.com
我住家附近警局电话：(617) 343-4633 （把我的博客地址给他们， 我的住址：BHA 2494）
我住家附近警局的地址：1 Schroeder Plz, Boston, MA 02120.
注册电邮地址的网站：gmail.com
12-03-2018 和华人矛盾 ---- 再谈高行健 （2）(About the Chinese French writer Gao, Xingjian)
Heard about this morning's broadcasting， I don't care about Gao, Xingjian's tears because I am possibly his victim.（听说了今天早上的播出， 我不会在乎高行健的眼泪，就因我很可能是他的一个受害者。）
1: Remember Yu's family and private assistant story? One of the fourth cousins of the private assistant was a famous actor of Bejing People's Art Theatre (北京人民艺术剧院) that Mr. Gao had worked as a scriptwriter for about 10 years(1981-1989) which was that actor Yu's prime acting time.
（1：记得于家和私人助理的故事吗？私人助理的一个四等亲堂兄就是北京人民艺术剧院的著名男演员于是之，高行健1981-1989年在北京人民艺术剧院做职业编剧期间，就是于是之当演员最红的那几年。）
I heard Bejing People's Art Theatre (北京人民艺术剧院) has been one of the major forces of this "radio program producing is the authority to evaluate to deny everyone's achievement" scheme. You all heard how Mr. Gao deny how I dare to claim I can have inherited wealth? You heard the almighty tone that how dare I say I can have intellectual incomes?
（我听说北京人民艺术剧院是这次“广播剧制作的目的就是利用表演来重新评审并否定每一个人的非演艺类的成就是否有可能真实”这么一个伎俩的核心势力之一。你们也都听到高行健的口气就是否定，就是在说我怎么敢宣称自己有继承财产？你们也都听到权威气势的语调对我竟然敢说我自己是有智慧产权收入的种种评论？）
2: Remember the argument if Mr. Gao won the Nobel literature prize fair? I remembered it was reported in the U.S. that all the pressure was on the lady evaluating committee member who recommended him.
（2：记得高行健获得2000年的诺贝尔文学奖时，对他的法文获奖作品是否是公平赢得文学奖的争议？我记得美国当时就此的报道都是提到对当时文学奖评审委员会里推荐他得奖的一个女士压力很大。）
Well, I heard, one of Mr. Gao's ex-wife who works for a French International radio station has married to one of that lady's colleague, and I heard French Chinese Community has a good level different opinions on if his article is good enough to be the award winner.
（我听说高行健的一个在法国国际广播电台工作的前妻就是再嫁给个这个女士的一个大学同事，我也听说法国的华裔社区对高行健的法文作品是否好的可以得奖持有很大的不同意见。）
My anger has been why he insults everyone who evaluated my intellectual incomes and those law peoples who publicly clarified my inheriting is lawful. Not to mention how dare he to deny in the name of "performing arts" that I am being the authentic creative scriptwriter for Beijing Olympic Opening Ceremony?
（我的愤怒就是为什么他参与公然羞辱每一个评估了我的智慧产权收入的人士以及所有公开澄清我的继承是合法继承的的美国司法界人士？更不用说他竟然敢以“表演艺术”的名义公然诋毁我是2008年北京奥运会开幕式闭幕式创意人的事实。）
3: Also, I heard another Mr. Gao's ex-wife who mothers a child from him, a retiree of the Nanjing University, was graduated from the same Nanjing University in 1962 which was the same year that "Beijing ex-girlfriend in private assistant's story" graduated.
（3：还有，我听说高行健的第一任妻子，就是从南京大学退休的他孩子妈妈，就是1962年从南京大学毕业的，那正是私人助理故事里的“北京前女友”毕业的同一年。）
----December 3rd, 2018
So, I make some announcements here to echo this morning's broadcasting:
（说了这些，下面是我对今天早上播出内容的公开回应：）
1: I don't care as well, and I agree all according to laws is good.
2: I refuse to provide for those demanded in this morning's broadcasting and in the future,
3: and I refuse those debts-paying that was demanded in this morning's broadcasting and in the future.
（1：我也不会在乎的，我同意一切法律。
2：我拒绝今天早上所播出的及今后可能的所有要求扣除我自己生活费用以支付他人生活费用的任何要求，
3：我拒绝·今天早上所播出的及今后可能的所有要求扣除我自己生活费用以代为偿还他人债务的任何要求。）
----December 3rd, 2018
12-02-2018 About Nobel Literature Prize Winner of 2000, Gao, Xingjian of 2000（有关2000年诺贝尔文学奖的获得者高行健）
你相不相信他是有才华的？(If he has talents?)
你相不相信她是有财产的？(If she has wealth?)
横批：不由你决定(Note: Not upon your authentication)
听说了今天早上播出的“外籍华裔名人都来驳斥她居然有财产的说法”，包括了旅法华人高行健及周华健等等，当然也就有些话题涉及作为诺贝尔奖金认可的法国文学作家，他是否是有些真实的才华。(Heard about this morning's broadcasting of "Prominent Chinese to joint-together to rebuke if her wealth exists", which featured a French Chinese writer Gao, Xingjian, and the talks about if he actually has some authentic talents. Mr. Gao is the winner of the Nobel Literature Award in 2000 for his work in French. )
有人问我相信他有才华吗？我先声明，我从未读过高行健的中文作品，也不懂法语，更还未到访过法国。(I was asked if I believe he is talented? I have to make it clear first that I never read his works in Chinese, nor that I understand any French, and I have not visited France yet.)
我在网上查了一下（百度百科----高行健），高行健1940年出生，父亲是个职员，母亲是个演员，1952年起就读南京大学附属金陵中学(当时是南京第十中学)。他本人很喜欢艺术，1957年考入北京外语学院法语专业，1962年毕业，作家。1970年代下乡后任职安徽的中学语文老师，1980年开始担任北京人民艺术剧院的编剧，80年代的后期（1987年）移民法国与当时已经担任法国一家国际电台主持人的妻子团聚。获2000年诺贝尔文学奖。(I checked out on the internet (Wikipedia----Gao Xingjian). In the year 1940, Mr. Gao was born into a clerk's family but his mother was an actress. He attended Nanjing Univerisity Affiliated Middle School in 1952 (was officially named Nanjing 10th Middle School at that time). Since his youth time, he enjoys arts but he chose to enter Beijing Foreign Studies University to study French and graduated in 1962, later he became a writer. In the 1970s, he was re-allocated to Anhui province to teach Chinese literature in a middle school during the 1970s "China's nationwide re-allocating movement". He became a scriptwriter for Beijing People's Art theatre since the year 1980. In 1987, he migrated to France to reunite with his wife who was already an anchor host for an International Radio Station in France at the time. He won Nobel Literature prize for his French work in the year 2000.)
首先，我认为大学阶段的教育是正式介绍一门学科的开始，很多诺贝尔奖金的获得者，都是在20岁左右才认识了某一门学科，在几十年之后因在该学科的杰出贡献而荣获诺贝尔奖金。(First of all, I think college e4ducation is the official introduction of a science. A lot of Nobel prize winners were introduced to a science in their 20s, and won their Nobel prizes years later for their hard-earned achievements in that science.)
其次，都是20多岁上大学才开始接触的这些学科，文学和科学一样，想要获得成功，都是需要付出努力，也都需要杰出的才华，但这不能说华人只有科学类的才华，只可以获得科学类的诺贝尔科学奖，就没有可能有文学类的才华以大学所学的第二语言的法文作品获得诺贝尔文学奖。(Second of all, all these Nobel prize winners were introduced in college when they were about 20 years old, literature or all kinds of sciences are all the same. It is the same to be successful in science major or in literature major, both need real hard work and real talents to have real achievements, but this is not to deny Chinese can only be talented enough in sciences category but not literature kind, nor to say it is impossible for a Chinese to be talented enough to win a Nobel prize for his French work as his second language, but his major he was introduced to since college.)
就我今天的博文标题，高行健究竟有没有法国文学的才华，我相信一定是由他法文作品的欣赏者所推崇的，除了说诺贝尔奖的评审委员是评定他诺贝尔文学奖的权威，我还真不知他是否有才华是由哪一个权威机构所认可，至于我究竟有没有继承财产，绝对是由法律所决定的。(Regarding today's title, if Mr. Gao is talented or not in French Literature, I think it must be from his fans favoritism, but other than Nobel literature prize's committee is the authority to authenticate his Nobel literature prize, I really don't know who or where is the authority to authenticate if he has talents. But if I have any inherited wealth, it is absolutely authenticated only by LAWS.)
----2018年12月2日。
12-01-2018 All about Shanghai and Medical College （上海医科大学的毕业论文怎么回事？）
Heard about this morning's broadcasting.
About Shanghai Medical University I graduated from in 1990
My response: This Medical University I graduated from is now Shanghai Medical College of the Fudan University, which also has a law school and business school.
I agree even though this is the medical college I graduated from where I received medical and pharmaceutical education, this medical college does not have the authoritative knowledge regarding if I made intellectual incomes in the U.S. nor if I have inherited some wealth.
I have some issues with some alumni of this same medical college. My anger has been why being alumni of the same medical college can be the reason for them to be the denial authority regarding if I can have intellectual incomes or inherited wealth, and why it is their business to be so angry at me if I have some "none of their business" romance money?
----Dec. 1st of 2018
About the rumor that my college diploma was revoked in 2007.
My response: This is an untrue statement.
I graduated in the year 1990.
About my final project paper was "copy all over".
My response: This is an untrue statement.
It was all academic references(similar to the APA style citation) appropriately cited according to the medical college's academic policy. My joke was saying how I didn't know how to relate the citations with my own research subject in my college's final project paper, not that I did not write anything at all of my own in my final project paper.
(所谓抄袭其实都是一些索引也就是成语引经论典里”引经"的意思，所有的索引都是依据上海医科大学的学术条例规范而引经论典的。我2004年时开玩笑讲的就是大学毕业那时的我写论文只会引经，不会论典，所以我完全不知我所引用的他人学术观点和我的毕业论文实验课题连不连的上，这并不是在说我的毕业论文里就只有引用他人文献观点而完全没有自己的东西。2004年开这个玩笑是因为当时做了电脑保全方面的研究，我已经知道了什么是论典以及如何论典了。）
About the incident of "cheating in the final exam" in the fall semester of our senior year (1990).
My response: The incident was caught by the security cameras and reported to the college principle office immediately. That was the only such incident. The final decision of "not another exam needed" was made by the medical college's academic committee and announced to us in the following spring semester. The entire class graduated in July of 1990 with diplomas.
It was rumored our class is the only class ever needed to have medicine major's Internal Medicine that has over 500 common diseases in the exam scope for each's symptoms, decisive diagnosis, pathology reasons and possible treatment method, Neurology(similar), and Psychiatry (similar) as three major final exams for Basic Medical System offered by the school of medicine, plus advanced Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacology as two pharmacy school's major final exams, and everything else, all in just one week's time. Obviously, we were pitied.
It was so dreadful to all of us when it was rumored that we may need to redo the final exam. If you heard those cries with tears from some who could only sleep for a couple of hours a day for that one hellish week, you won't do that to us. The school academic committee members are(were) all medical college graduated, either from the school of pharmacy or from the school of medicine. They knew that three Basic Medical System courses were experimentally upgraded courses for us pharmacology major students, our class was the only pharmacology class participated.
----Dec. 1st of 2018
有关我曾祖母1941年在香港替我设立的信托。
我的回应：1941年，我曾祖母当时已经守寡10年，她的三名成人子女也都已婚已育。我没听说她1941年时期的感情生活，我认为这和我曾祖母特意替我办理的信托也没有任何关系。我是2004年按照我曾祖母的遗嘱继承了该信托。
这钱一分一毫都是我曾母自己的钱，把这钱全部给我也是我曾祖母自己的意愿，我作为唯一受益人继承我曾祖母所信托的财产是按照我曾祖母自己的遗嘱，按照继承法信托法，所以不需要任何人同意或者不同意，这钱就是我方敏的合法财产。曾祖母的礼物是我方敏应该珍惜的，而不是什么我方敏有钱就应该扔掉给别人的。
----2018年12月1日。
11-30-2018 From my current schooling look back my college time
Heard about this morning's confusion about my paper's very good scores
My answer: I do have an MBA web blog as required for my class, I uploaded the PPT from the same interview but for MBA503 (Leading the Organizational Change). The paper is for the class MBA513(Leadership).
----Nov. 30th, 2018
Heard about such advise from this morning's broadcasting as
"you shouldn't apply to a school as you wish but any classroom that can provide education should be enough."
My answer: I do enjoy the freedom to choose a classroom for my education, and please mark the knowledge that tuition-payment is not your money to privilege you to have such an opionion to voice.
----Nov. 30th, 2018
My frustration:
I truly never have lived on those advisers,
I am truly not living on those advisers currently,
I truly never demanded to live on those advisers,
I truly don't need those advisers donation to have my desired education,
I truly don't know who those advisers are nor if they have any money to fancy that I would need from.
And I truly have my own good money from my own birth grandfathers, which I inherited according to each of my own birth grandfather's own will.
And I truly don't owe those advisers any financial debt.
----Min Fang, Nov 30th, 2018
The horrible:
I really don't know why those advisers are so stuck in my life, so I have called laws to help to free myself from their such unwanted and never needed to advise as you heard in this morning's broadcasting.
They are never really in my life but they are so sneak around in my life as how they let you hear their comment or their opinion about whatever I do in my own free life on a public radio as if they are a master as wish to rule. The most horrible part, they don't do just commenting on a radio but so reach-ed out decision-making about me without me even need to hear anything about. They are in my school, in my neighborhood, and in every place I have any dealing with, and they are so refuse to back off.
I heard when I was in college in Shanghai almost 30 years ago, this was how these people, rumored from the same or related group, get involved in my life: This was a group of associated people, first, identified the person who could possibly be a friend to me, then talked to that person as complete anonymous strangers but know "all my secrets for all my life to tell how evil I truly is", when that identified possible friend of mine was just walking on the streets. It of course freak that person out permanently from that moment on, and me as well after I heard about this because I know for certain they are the people I never even heard of before March of this year of 2018.
I heard this was how my father's sister(s) lost her(their) lover(s). I heard one guy was grabbed by a complete stranger from the streets to hear such secrets for how "so unworthy" my father's sister(s) "so truly deserved to be and so should be known for".
----Nov. 30th, 2018
11-29-2018 I refuse so-called "Same High School inheriting"（我拒绝所谓“同一所高中继承”的说法）
I refuse so-called "Same High School inheriting"（我拒绝所谓“同一所高中继承” 的说法）
I refuse such saying of "humiliation of the high school if not having money" （我拒绝所谓“没钱就是南师大附中耻辱”的说法）
听说了今天早上的播出内容，重点：
1：因为我方敏根本就没有钱，所以我方敏是南师大附中毕业的就是南师大附中的耻辱。如果我方敏居然有钱，那只要是南师大附中毕业的就都应该够资格继承就都应该有钱。
请问究竟是什么钱？多少钱？为什么只要我方敏居然有钱，只要是南师大附中毕业的就都够资格有钱？南师大附中的就都应该够资格有什么钱？有哪一笔钱？南师大附中的就都应该够资格有多少钱？有多少笔钱？
我方敏拒绝被一些敲诈勒索者称为是南师大附中的耻辱，我方敏拒绝任何南师大附中在校的，曾今就读过的，毕业生（除方敏外），及他们的所有相关人员继承我方敏的任何财产。我方敏拒绝任何南京师范大学及南京师范大学附属的任何机构及学校的任何人员包括在校生曾经就读过的和已经毕业的，及他们的所有相关人员继承我方敏的任何财产
据说，因为中国国家主席习近平和国家总理李克强的共同家庭成员程虹，国家总理李克强本人及中国北京中央政府其他一些工作人员据传都是南京师范大学附属小学就读过或者毕业的，所以海外一直有传言，只要程虹自己的婚姻大家庭是实质拥有并统治中国，方敏的死亡就是他们的婚姻大家庭一定可以无需方敏意愿就一定可以分享方敏财产的机会，只要方敏自己人都已经死了，还有谁在乎法律在乎方敏自己意愿？他们自己的婚姻大家庭可以完全无视中国宪法而一家实质统治中国，就是中国已经没有有效的宪法也不需要任何法律就只需要宠爱一个女人屁股的最真实有效的权威证明。
我方敏立场，只要中国还是一个人民共和国，只要中国还是由中国共产党集体领导的法治国家，我方敏的财产可以被谁继承完全由我方敏自己决定。有法律，他们就没有可能继承我方敏的任何财产；没有法律，他们这些人也就是自己被别人持刀拿枪给杀了，也就是他们这些人自己的全部钱财被别人拿走而已。他们是有警卫保镖，不用怕？我说当保镖的才是有枪有拳头有力气的，才是绝对可以保证近距离射击百发百中的，为什么真正有枪有力气有拳头的就只是拿工资分点钱而已？都已经没有法律了，谁还需要智谋对付法律干嘛？都是他们这些人自己在高调强调中国960万平方公里土地，就只需要珍惜这一个被他们这些中国的国家领导人所共同宠爱的女人屁股，既不需要法律，也不再是由中国共产党所领导统治。咱海外人士说说，只要是个男的，只要不是无能也不是性病造成性器官严重变形，谁不会操女人屁股？只要没有法律，谁还怕谁啊？只要他们这些男的都给中华人民共和国的子弹给枪毙了，死了，又有谁在乎他们所共同宠爱的老女人屁股是不是还活着，该不该过如何好的不得了，但不由他们自己的工资所提供的奢侈生活？
想试试什么是“只要没有法律”？愿意尝试签字画押不需法律保护？如果在美国，就这人口袋里的区区二十元美金就可能是这人丢了性命的原因，报纸上成天一堆类似的社区治安报道提醒民众警惕小心。没有法律保护，谁怕谁啊？有法律保护有警察巡逻，这人都会被提醒出门时口袋里一定要备点零钱防身，原因之一就是以防被人劫财不得而伤了性命不合算，其他就是以备万一要叫个出租车等等。
西部片看多了，也就知道法律治理真正就是全体人民共同的愿望。就看看那执法的和犯法的，统统都是有枪有力气有拳头的，就是这么一次次的拳脚相向，一次次的刀枪相对，先进法治国家如此建立的历史就已经充分体现了法治国家是全体人民共同的意愿。我方敏是一点都不担心“只要没有法律”这种威胁，或者“人都已经死了，谁在乎？”这种论点。一个国家是否法治是否有法律是这个国家的全体人民都在乎的。
----2018年11月29日。
2：如果我是否是中国古代皇帝的继承人是“True“，为何我是否继承财产是“Untrue”？
这也是我方敏对今天早上所播出内容的疑问，如果我继承财产是“untrue”，又如何确定我是否是古代皇帝的继承人？按照我本人说法，家族画像的电子版本（附原件的年份证明）及一些可查证的历史文件索引已经证实了我是中国古代皇帝的继承人。
我听说这是美国司法界内部的争议，原因就是我的信托登记不是公开信息可供所有人查证的。我本人立场，在我从2004年开始已经陆续收到了我的信托按时给付的一些费用的情况下，在我本人在2015年也已经通知了美国警方我有继承财产的经历情况下，我不愿意我的私人信托登记被所有人所查证，我本人认为就算不是所有人都可以查证我的信托登记，只要确定有合法的费用给付是按照2004年7月1日的会议决定而按时支付给我，非亲自查证人士对我是否继承财产至少应该是“not certain" 而不是”untrue“立场。据说持“untrue”观点的是南师大附中的毕业生，说我是古代皇帝继承人的是美国政府司法部AGO（Attorney General Office）。
----2018年11月29日。
3： 上海丁姓人士与南京
据说上海丁姓私人助理的妻子与文化大革命时期的名人王洪文夫妻两人或其中一个是同一个工厂的，很熟悉，关系一直也很好，据说现在丁家小孩和王洪文孩子的关系也很好。
上海的丁姓私人助理就是1965-1966年送我母亲的结婚礼物到南京的那个人，据说自此一直和王博真苏家隆保持了联络，据说这个丁姓私人助理的孩子和苏家隆王博真的一些朋友包括周洪良都认识。
----2018年11月29日。
11-28-2018 About my web-gifting idea
Heard this morning's broadcasting about an angry husband's blame on me.
I heard I was blamed for ridiculously announced a child for him. Well, my famous "It must be the deservedness" comment was echoing the episode that, rumored, his wife proudly produced, which featured how the husband, together with his cousins, all sharing a child each from the same woman. I was just echoing the story I heard that was broadcasted, never the authentic source for its accuracy. The husband's anger targeting me is ridiculous and absurd enough.
Gosh, the wife is talented. I heard she mimicked every single person's voice that was featured for the first almost 2/3 of this morning's episode, including my current "got a flu voice".
So, I won't be the person to worry about my web blog's public access, as announced without a "note", by the Chinese team.
----Nov. 28th, 2018
About my web-gifting idea, if it is intrusive to every warm-heart or hot-heart people's privacy if I asking too much information to gift?
I have no such intention to be intrusive. As I said, I only intend to personally gift to my friends or relatives that I do mind if gifting to someone who is negative enough or even harmful to me, and I do appreciate every warm-heart, hot-heart persons kindness to me. Everything else I don't need to know as long as it is lawful for me to gift, such as a checkbox to acknowledge "not to use for unlawful activities", or a note to myself how much is the max appropriateness for this friend for per tax year or per event, or a combined max if appropriate only for both per year and per event, etc.. I am thinking how not to be intrusive. I reject the idea to out-source the evaluation of my own appreciation or the gifting to my friends or relatives.
----Nov. 28th, 2018
Also, some said if this would encourage somebody to "violate laws on my behave" to demand gift from me?
I say this somebody would need to check if I have money for this person to demand first, and if I have money which certainly means I am protected by laws effectively to have my lawful money, well, it means I am the person will put a note on that web-gifting website to remind everyone that Laws forbid financial rewarding efforts to encourage anyone to violate laws.
Currently, the money "still in concern" if can be my money are those paid out providing that I have not received yet (such as $400Million per year), and some intellectual incomes I earned. I am obviously safe and well protected by laws. I will reject any demand for me to reward any violating laws effots.
----published on Nov. 29th, 2018
If I would ever accept the recommendation of "friends list" from somebody who publicly denounced my eligibility to be an associated to that somebody self?
I say why would this can be anybody's expectation for me? Especially those who are so denounced me because of my so not so rich childhood.
My answer for this type of curiosity is: I will do my own decision based on the list itself, my personal gifting is to my personal own friends, not whoever's personal own friend(s).
----Nov. 28th, 2018
我方敏现在是在美国有名的大学名城，麻州波士顿。很多以前在中国的认识的一些人的小孩可能也都已经到了可以出国留学的年经了，也可能会在波士顿念书。我相信他们这些做了家长的，肯定是不希望自己的孩子有任何麻烦，我本人也不认为他们的孩子远道而来就有能力帮得上我的忙，更不用提在目前的大环境下是否有意愿。我没有任何需要就我是否有合法的巨额财产而向任何人说明的地方，我有钱没钱都是一切是法律一切依据法律。
我的态度也就和二三十年前上学时一样，就只是坐在一间教室里上课而已，同学之间确实没有任何互相需要的地方，也不应该有任何利益冲突的地方，当年大学毕业因为“哪来哪去”政策连毕业分配同学之间都没有任何利益冲突。现在最多也就只是在同一个城市而已，所以我的态度也就和二三十年前上学时一样，处得来出，处不来不处。这么多年没交往，家家日子也都过的挺好。美国有法律，也就是在同一个学校上过课而已，又不是谁欠了谁的，没什么必须交往的，也不应该有什么就是不准交往的。
对这些人当中的一部分人来说，我方敏就是死绝了他们都不会在乎，有些甚至巴不得我早死早好，我还有什么方面包括有钱没钱，有孩没孩，是他们居然会如何在乎的？要是居然在乎了，又是为谁在乎，为什么原因在乎？我方敏也没有任何需要他们的地方？我方敏也永远不会在乎这些盼着我早死早好的人？
----2018年11月28日。
11-27-2018 和国内外华人华裔的矛盾
和中国政府有关对我是按照遗嘱继承信托财产而有钱“就是不同意”的矛盾。
方敏的回应：“就是不同意”没有任何可能改变任何财产的法律所有权。
没有任何人超越法律，就是很明确的说明，没有任何人只要“就是不同意”就可以任意改变财产的法律所有权。坚持以“就是不同意”作为借口想要通过劫持绑架以胁迫财产的法律拥有者改变意愿以达到改变财产法律拥有权的目的，已经构成对当事人事实上的绑架敲诈勒索。
同样，如果中华人民共和国是个宪法有效的国家，国务院总理李克强的老婆程虹就不可能是中华人民共和国事实上的总理，就没有可能因为够得着习近平的裤裆共有一个已经公开承认的30-40多岁的儿子，就成为中华人民共和国事实上的国家主席。程虹永远不可能因为是中国国家总理及中国国家主席共同的妻子就可以签发中国国家主席令或者中国国家总理令，更不可能号称因为已经是事实上的一妻多夫的私人家庭所以是事实上的实质拥有了中华人民共和国960万平方公里的统治权。
同样，如果中华人民共和国是个法治国家，按照中华人民共和国的法律，中国政府总理李克强国家主席习近平就不可能因为“就是不同意”，就任意更改中国境内的股票上市公司的法律拥有权是属于所有该公司的股票投资者的这一法律上的事实。同样道理，中国政府总理李克强国家主席习近平不可能因为“就是不同意”，就任意改变境外任何私人财产的法律所有权。
举个轻松点的例子：成语: 醍醐灌顶的新解释
中国公务员一个月工资是由中国人民缴税后由中国人民给予中国政府发放，假设是平均每月￥3500人民币。
我是美国公民，我觉得中国生活费水平每月￥1500元人民币就已经挺好，所以我说我不同意中国公务员的每月工资水平，在中国明明每月￥1500元人民币就已经够用的情况下，凭什么需要发放￥3500元的每月工资？我作为华人美国公民就是坚决不会同意!!!! 就是坚决坚决不会同意！！！！！！就是坚决坚决坚决不会同意！！！！！！！
可以想象吗：这次轮到是中国13亿人民各个都是醍醐灌顶状的伸长着脖子瞪着眼问，“你不同意！？”
当中国政府一再强调就是坚决不会同意美国的公司按其外国投资公司的指示将部分该公司经营业务的盈利作为我一个人的生活费用给付，世界各国人民及他们各自的政府就是如此的醍醐灌顶状的各个伸长着脖子瞪着眼问，“你们不同意！？”
就是这么简单，我所继承的所有信托都不是中国政府给的钱，按照我所继承的每一个信托的设立人遗嘱，也根本就没有任何其他受益人，也就是说包括了没有任何中国公民是我所继承的任何信托的其他受益人，所以不可能由中国政府不同意，更不应该由中国政府支持任何涉嫌偷窃抢劫钱财等等刑事犯罪的行为。
我方敏的智慧产权收入也是如此。阿尔贝特·高尔既不是智慧产权的评估机构发放机构，也不是美国法律的象征美国法院的裁决，更不是智慧产权的贡献者，所以不可能由阿尔贝特·高尔或者他的朋友或公司等等不同意我方敏的智慧产权收入，美国的任何民事法院也不可能在没有任何相关民事争议案件的情况下就对我方敏的智慧产权收入做出任何判决，更不应该由阿尔贝特·高尔或者他的朋友或公司等等支持任何涉嫌偷窃抢劫钱财等等刑事犯罪的行为。
----2018年11月27日。
有关“只要是方敏的钱在哪个账户里都可以自己拿都可以自己保留都应该是方敏会给的奖励金”。
方敏的回应：没有任何可能。
类似的，如果未经授权就已经擅自转移了的别人钱财，是否可以被认为是作为方敏会给予的奖励金而保留？
方敏的回应：没有任何可能。
我方敏本人不愿意花钱鼓励任何破坏任何国家法律以及任何违反任何国家法律的行为。
我方敏本人是美国公民，美国法律禁止任何美国公民花钱从事参与或鼓励任何违法活动。
如认为各国法律有不足的方面以及有需要强化可以强化的地方，我方敏本人认为应该是和各国立法机构以及执法当局联络通知立法机构执法当局予以改进，而非破坏违反当地法律。
在公共汽车上偷了钱包就翻墙蹦高钻地洞地展示灵活性，在世界各国都不可能会被当地警方认为是在训练当地的警务人员如何抓小偷以强化当地警务人员的执法能力或者锻炼当地警务人员的体能及快速应变能力。我方敏也绝不会予以奖励。
----2018年11月27日。
有人问，如果我的信托有投资规模挺大的公司，我的生活费用给付为何不是想象的可以和公司规模相匹配的那么高？
我的回应：我相信这可能是很多人的疑问，我说一下大概的计算方法：
比方说，投资的是个生意兴隆的饭店，每天结账利润丰厚。今天，结完账的老板要给孩子零花钱，如何算能给多少。
1：老板要扣除明天进货的钱，帐是明天的成本，但钱需要今天预留。
2：老板要扣除预约的明天上门清理炉头的钱，帐是这个月的成本，但钱需要今天预留。
3：老板要扣除预约的几个月以后装潢饭店门面的钱，帐是今年的成本，但一部人的钱需要今天预留。
。。。。
N：老板要扣除预定今天要给老婆（孩子妈妈）的作为家用的钱。
剩下的，老板才能考虑是不是可以以及能给孩子多少零花钱。
就这么简单。我的信托都是由专业管理人员管理，都是一切依据公司经营需要进行计算。我本人也没有意愿向公众过多汇报私人家用相关信息。我所宣布的5%礼品费用是依据目前已知的4亿美金一年的生活费用计算，共计2千万美金每年，我已经决定这2千万美金一年礼品费用是个固定数字，今后也不会因生活费用给付提高而改变。从现在起，我用每年2千万美金称呼我的礼品费用支出，不再使用5%作为称谓。按照美国法律，这两千万美金礼品费不可以作为任何人自认我应该会送礼就擅自拿取别人钱财的赔偿金（美国法律禁止任何美国公民花钱从事参与或鼓励任何违法活动）。
我收到4亿美金的生活费用就会在网上公布亲朋向我索取礼物的方式，送礼只会在我宣布之后才开始，不会预付。
----2018年11月27日。
上海，不知是否是方家方面，让我烦的不行的就是那说话的态度以及期待，怎么就认定了我会宠他们这些男男女女，不是认定我一定会宠这个女的丈夫，就是认定我一定会宠那个男的老婆，凭什么呀？把我给烦的够呛。我哪里是会宠人的人啊？我的个性从小就很自我，哪里会自我牺牲去宠别人？凭什么呀？我感觉吧，有那么一群人就是没停的，就是认定了我一定会宠，就是认定了我一定会宁愿自己死绝了都只想要让他们开心，就是认定了我就是没有自我就只在乎他们是否快乐满意，凭什么呀？听听，他们自认对我最大的威胁，就是只要不满足他们要求，他们就宣布这一辈子都不会见我。我是个女的呀，我哪来的生理需求一定要被她们那些女的见啊？就那些看着既不年轻又不英俊的老男人，我要是见到了，除了心理难以承受还能有什么呀？实在是把我给烦的不行，气得够呛。估计又是什么都已经几十岁的一群，却原来是活脱脱台湾琼瑶式爱情小说里的人物在真实生活里出现了。根本一群的老花痴，真是烦得不行。
----2018年11月27日。
11-26-2018 与南京方面的矛盾（6） ---- 和王博真苏家隆一家的矛盾
为什么王博真的亲朋好友提到了王博贤都是一副傲慢高贵的态度，他们自己都是什么人啊？
我的回答：我是听到很多人都不明白这点，王博真20岁才随解放军进驻南京，算是进了城做了城里人。王博真进城一两年后，11岁的王博贤就进了南京城，也就是说相比王博真二十多岁才当上了城里人，王博贤年纪只有11岁就已经做上了城里人在城里的小学中学念书毕业，进城时间也就差了一两年而已，怎么是王博贤反而成了乡巴佬了？世界各地包括美国真是有太多的中国大陆移民都在奇怪怎么会这样？他们自己的经历怎么都是觉得差不多时间移民的小孩子才是适应最快的移民？王博真的城里人亲朋既然很尊重王博真，怎么会把王博贤当成了乡巴佬而如此高贵傲慢？
其实很简单，主要是王博真自己把山东她父母家里她的妈妈及兄弟姐妹对我妈妈的态度又体现在了她自己家里，而且一定是体现在了所有和王博贤有关的方方面面。所有王博真的亲朋也都从心眼里认为我妈妈王博贤就是个乡下进城的下等人乡巴佬保姆，被称为了他们朋友的妹妹。我妈妈刚生下了就被自己的生母即王博真的亲生妈妈在大雪天扔出去不要了（王博真是她的第一个孩子或第一个女儿），又被我外公王怀迎从雪地里捡回来用面糊糊喂养是真实经历，所有我母亲的兄弟姊妹似乎都因此而认同我母亲是一个家里不想要应该扔出去的一个孩子，虽然血脉相同但从来不是他们的姊妹，而我外祖父王怀迎是中医郎中又经常需串乡出诊常年不在家，估计是我母亲其实一直是她自己亲生父母家里的一个下等人的原因。因我曾祖母经济条件很好，在我爷爷1948年替我办理了信托后，更是比我爷爷还好，我父亲常年随我曾祖母独立居住，对我父亲的三个弟妹而言（家里是两大人三小孩），我父亲一直都是属于家里经济条件好点的隔壁邻居（一大一小）。所以，我父亲的弟妹对我父亲也有点疏离，但因为我爷爷奶奶对我父亲的态度，他们也都认同我父亲是我爷爷奶奶的长子他们的大哥。
而我妈妈王博贤呢，一直以为王博真这个亲姐姐虽然很土很土，但她自己是个不应该这么说的一个嫡亲的妹妹，是她对于她和王淑秋（又称苏淑秋，王博真弟弟的女儿）同是11岁从同一个山东乡下来到南京为何如此巨大差别而始终不理解始终难以释怀的原因。估计我妈妈王博贤从未想过是她自己被当成了乡巴佬，我和我父亲方文海一直看得很清楚，确实也没什么需要向王博真苏家隆做解释的或者做辩护的，所以就一直只是强调别一口一声说是王博贤欠了苏家隆王博真任何抚养费用，王博贤在王博真的家里就只是个做粗活的女佣是王博真所有亲朋都已经从他们自己对王博贤的态度里已经充分表达的事实。王博贤从未欠了苏家隆王博真任何抚养费用，苏家隆王博真的亲朋并不都是我母亲王博贤的亲朋，更难说是不是我方敏作为王博贤女儿的亲朋。（如不明白我会添加注释）
----2018年11月28日。
听说就是山东的王家经常在抱怨，明明是血缘关系，为何不认亲戚？
我的回应：因为没有任何亲情，很多更是从不相识，所以不能说是亲戚，只能说是有血缘关系，我就是不认可所有对我方敏对我母亲王博贤的鄙视仇恨表达居然被说成是亲属定义。中华人民共和国法律上的五等亲并不是中华人民共和国法律上的责任义务关系而是利益冲突回避关系，美国法律也是如此。我对我母系的王家血缘关系如此理解，对我父系的方家血缘关系也是如此理解。
不是我不愿意接受血缘关系的亲情表达，我就是不认可所有对我方敏对我母亲王博贤的鄙视仇恨表达居然被说成是亲属定义亲情表达。不是我很瞧不起山东乡下的王家，何况很多当年的乡下人也都像我母亲一样已经离开乡下进城了，王博真当年唯一还留在乡下的一个弟弟，其子女也都已经全部离开了山东乡下的老家。所有王家血缘关系经过王博真的帮助进城的及到过南京的，就只有我母亲王博贤是王博真的所有亲朋都认同的乡巴佬保姆下等人，只有我母亲王博贤必须帮助干家务才可以有口饭吃。
回答：因为没有任何亲情，很多更是从不相识，所以不能说是亲戚。我方敏永远都不认为鄙视仇恨的血缘关系就是亲情，我方敏的生活里永远也不需要持这种定义的任何血缘关系。
----2018年11月28日。
A note:
It is rumored the University of Bridgeport is another authority source to deny if I was or if I could be a tech-leader in JPM Chase technology upgrading between 2004-2007. I have contacted laws about if my work experience in JPM Chase was the reason for denials to my intellectual incomes. I have confidence that professors from the University of Bridgeport I graduated from in the year 2000 are the people who understand that academic evaluation is never as simple as freedom of speech. The University of Bridgeport has a School of Business that has related laws coverage, as well as School of Engineering(Computer Science) I graduated from which are academic enough about all topics I claimed who I am. The University of Bridgeport also has, in their record, my diploma and transcripts of Shanghai Medical University I graduated from in 1990.
----Nov 28th, 2018
11-25-2018 周老师是王博真苏家隆的朋友，但从来不是我母亲我本人的朋友
今天早上所播出故事里的周老师退休前是一名中学老师，曾是我妈妈的大姐夫苏家隆当年在中学教俄语时的的学生，这个周老师的一个小孩现在是南师大附中的一个老师。这个周老师和他以前的一些同学是我姨夫苏家隆2000年去世前终生的朋友，也是我母亲大姐王博真终生的朋友。我可以在读初一时在四中住校，姨夫苏家隆和我说过他有去找过人，不知是不是这个周老师，我高一时可以住校的原因就已经肯定和他们一点关系都没有了。虽然姨父苏家隆在我读完初一的那年暑假已经领养了他自己的小孩，但对我一直态度友善，我也从未要求过被他当成家庭成员对待。
他们从来不是我母亲的朋友，和我父母也从无任何交往。但他们是从我母亲住在我母亲大姐夫妻两个人的家里时就已经认识了我母亲，很清楚我母亲只是做着一个住家女佣（是个妹妹，从农村来的，帮忙干点活，不用去理），才能挣得我母亲自己当年的衣食住行，从他们提及我母亲的一份态度就很容易看清楚这点。他们很清楚我母亲父亲结婚以后，我母亲都是和当时就已经很高工资的我父亲共同生活，不存在我母亲会抢夺王博真财产的担忧。我母亲和我提过，我母亲结婚以后有事去找周老师他们这些人帮忙，他们都是很明确的说他们是王博真的朋友，有什么事让王博真和他们谈。对这些，我没有任何反感，这也是我自己为人态度，只是强调他们和我母亲本人从来不是朋友。
周老师自已也是有好几个孩子的父亲，他应该知道做父母的心情，如果父母给一个孩子买衣服，另一个孩子如果想强，父母会帮谁。我自己就从未担心过我奶奶毛阿妹会帮她亲生的其他孩子们和我抢我爷爷方智仁特意给我的东西，更没担心过我奶奶毛阿妹会帮她的什么情人的婚生小孩和我抢我爷爷方智仁特意给我的东西。我对我所有的奶奶也都没这份担心。我自己从来没有想过需要抢夺我父母“在中国去世”留下的任何东西，我自己也从未抢夺过苏家隆王博真两人在中国去世留下的任何东西。
苏家隆王博真一直抱怨我可以经常去他们家，他们家的孩子就不能来我们家，那是因为自从他们家领养了孩子，巨大的立场态度待遇差别让我母亲难以接受她自己一直就只是他们家免费女佣而已这个事实，也就是因为苏家隆王博真一直想要对等处理，除非过年过节我也就很少去他们家里，我也很早就已经是不去也不会在乎的立场，说实话，他们家有什么吸引力，我哪里会就是一定要去？我从来没有任何责任义务必须让苏家隆王博真所领养的苏（王）淑秋的孩子到我自己家里做客，我没有这个意愿，我就是不会邀请。
王博真夫妻领养他们自己的小孩是在我初一那年的暑假，从那时起，我就是他们夫妻很确定的就只是一个亲戚，随着他们家庭感情增进，我这个亲戚也就是越来越疏离而已直至我于1996年10月离开南京离开中国常年在美国生活，不知这个周老师从何而来的这份某明奇妙的，由他们这些王博真苏家隆的朋友们出面要求我（？）出钱抚养由王博真所领养的女儿王淑秋（苏淑秋）所育的一个目前都已经22岁的成年孩子的要求？
真是莫名奇妙的无稽。我母亲王博贤的名字他们一直不认，对他们来说，哪里会认王博贤的女儿很平常很应该的，可他们怎么就认为凭他们自己的名字老脸是可以来找王博贤的小孩提要求的？真的是一点朋友情分都没有，一点交往关系都没有，这还是他们自己一直都在强调了几十年的，我哪里有可能会认他们这几张老脸说话，就冲他们的几张老脸满足他们代为提出的要求？是不是滑稽至极？我母亲王博贤很早就已经从周洪良几个人那里学会了不应该认为我方敏是可以凭王博贤女儿的身份要求周洪良那几个人帮忙任何事情，也请周洪良这几个人教育他们自己的子女别认为他们是可以凭周洪良那几个人的名字向我方敏提任何要求的。我也是不会不好意思直说他们和我从来不是朋友，意思也就是他们又算老几？他们也够资格向我提要求？我哪里是会给他们面子的人？某名奇妙！！！
不光是他们这些人，还有什么美国的英国的上流社会，通过广播剧坚决坚持一定要求我必须给他们一个面子要自愿倾家荡产，要自己自愿死绝了拉到，还要自己自愿断子绝孙，否则就不配和他们做个朋友走进上流社会，原来要求自愿失去自己的一切就只为了够资格被他们引荐可以行个屈屈礼？那我也就是全部坚决拒绝，也全部坚决报警处理了。这朋友不做也罢，我自己就已经至少是十四或者十五个皇帝的继承人，2004年6月30日那一天我就继承了一堆的封号头衔，一个皇帝爷爷至少就赏赐给了我一个头衔封号，还有丰厚礼物，再加母后娘娘的加官进爵（我都已经是皇帝爷爷的继承人了，也就母后娘娘给加个官进个爵了）。皇家送礼不都是头衔封号金银珠宝做礼物吗？凭我自己就足够高档上流了，我选择我自己和自己的孩子们活的滋滋润润的，和一些配和我做朋友的快快乐乐的谈天说地。
我方敏坚决拒绝今天早上通过广播剧向我本人提出的任何要求。
（最初版本，据说看不懂我的意思，只好改成现版本:
王博真夫妻领养他们自己的小孩是在我初一那年的暑假，从那时起，我就是他们夫妻很确定的就只是一个亲戚，随着他们家庭感情增进，我这个亲戚也就是越来越疏离而已直至我于1996年10月离开南京离开中国常年在美国生活，不知这个周老师从何而来的这份某明奇妙的，由他们这些王博真苏家隆的朋友们出面要求我（？）出钱抚养由王博真所领养的女儿王淑秋（苏淑秋）所育的一个目前都已经22岁的成年孩子的要求？真是莫名奇妙的无稽。
周老师自已也是有好几个孩子的父亲，他应该知道做父母的心情，如果父母给一个孩子买衣服，另一个孩子如果想强，父母会帮谁。我自己就从未担心过我奶奶毛阿妹会帮她亲生的其他孩子们和我抢我爷爷方智仁特意给我的东西，更没担心过我奶奶毛阿妹会帮她的什么情人的婚生小孩和我抢我爷爷方智仁特意给我的东西。我对我所有的奶奶也都没这份担心。我自己从来没有想过需要抢夺我父母“在中国去世”留下的任何东西，我自己也从未抢夺过苏家隆王博真两人在中国去世留下的任何东西。
我方敏坚决拒绝今天早上通过广播剧向我本人提出的任何要求。)
----2018年11月25日。
11-24-2018 Ridiculous confusions and "the same high school" (某明奇妙的困扰及“同一所高中的”）
A note:
I heard there is some confusion regarding who received that reallocated money from my reward's original size, I assume it was added to the total amount of the entire pre-marketing team's reward to be distributed according to pre-marketing team's own internal evaluation. This is the reason I said I reject any suggestion nor support to further re-allocate my reward if there is any confusion still existing in either research team or pre-marketing team.
I am truly very happy that I am rewarded by Viagra. I was famously almost cried publicly in 2004 because I thought "I finally got it" would mean absolutely nothing.
----Nov 24th, 2018
老爸爸：看到我现在的文风和以前不同，这只是因为记录了这一场财产保卫战对我的影响。我会好的，别担心。很惨的是， 没能让人听到roaring（狮吼），就只让人听到howling（狼嚎）。
方家小姐当厨娘
最难的时候，打动我心的就是这首诗“I am an Artist （我是艺术家）”， 我当时是在一家咖啡店里，哭的停不下来（没嚎啕）。看一下写的是不是我，我觉得每一个字都是在写我，都是在告诉我有人懂这就是我，我自己翻译的。还有， Ingonyama（狮子王）, Sapphire 是两个爷爷赏赐给我的头衔，General 就是我自己挣得了。
方家小姐做翻译 (Missy Translator)
Heard about this morning's broadcasting.
1: From Chinese in general: My wealth was originally carried out from China, so it should be Chinese money.
My answer: The same is every penny in your own wallet, which is(was) also originally carried out from China, how come you haven't beg for food even on your trip abroad? If you know for certain every penny lawfully in your own wallet is your lawful private money, you should know for certain as well that my lawful wealth is my lawful private money.
2: From biologically associated: That is originated from a grandfather's money.
My answer: If that is your grandfather, you should know it is not your money which is from his own signature. You are not born yet at that grandfather's death which already means you don't even have a name for that grandfather to give you a penny, your line's senior from that grandfather's own seed already had received the deserved share in family inheriting at that grandfather's death years ago. If you refuse to acknowledge that grandfather's own signature is the lawful presentation of his own will, how dare you claim that is a grandfather to you?
3: From some same high school graduated, the Viagra reward should not be mine because it must be some underwear routing.
My answer: No wonder you did not logic well in your college entry test over 30 years ago. It is so miraculously amazing that you can still prove it was never because of the education you received from the high school you graduated from, after all these years. The correct logic should be, it doesn't matter if it is some underwear routing or it is an academic reward, it should never be your saying. Is this logic tip help you to improve your future logic capability a little?
Further explanation: 1) My Viagra reward has been under law investigation already because I have not received it since almost 10 years ago, 2) and the evaluating pharmaceutical company already explained on a public media as well to answer the public curiosity why it was rewarded to me. So, why it is you deservedness to have an otherwise saying from your own ridiculous confusion if that is some money from an underwear routing, just because you are also graduated from the same high school but never in the pharmaceutical-related major? Is this explanation can help you to understand some common logic?
听说在美国，智慧产权收入的发放渠道是，(I heard the distribution channel in the U.S. are:)
（该药业）公司在职员工从公司领取，由（该药业）公司开具支票给付；(Employees receive paying checks signed by the rewarding company)
（该药业公司）已离退休辞职人员，以及像我这种有贡献但非（该药业）公司人员，都是从与（该药业）公司有协作关系的律师公司或者会计师公司领取，由该协作关系律师公司或者会计师公司开具支票。(Those retired or left, or associated person like me, should receive paying checks signed by the rewarding company's associated attorney firm or accounting firm.)
听说我收不到是因为该协作关系律师公司的一名工作人员（曾经在南师大或者南师大附中附小附幼就读过的或者毕业生）将药业公司所提供的奖金名单里我的名字给换成了他们自己朋友的名字开具支票。（I heard I haven't received Viagra reward is because somebody works in that rewarding company's associated attorney firm, who was also graduated from the same* high school I graduated from, has replaced my name from the reward list provided by the pharmaceutical rewarding company to sign the paying check to that person's own friend.)
*Either graduated from or had attended,
*The same High school, or its affiliated Junior high school,or affiliated kinder garden, or affiliated from: the Nanjing teacher's college.
----Nov. 24th, 2018
What the same high school means to me, at least currently?
It means if I ever dare to have a high school reunion in some property that rumored may be related to my wealth, the situation would be such that everything inside that property would start to go disappeared once guests are arriving till it only house empty walls, it property registry would have a name changed unnoticed, and its originally lawfully registered property's owner(s) associated bank accounts being deleted already before the scheduled party ending time.
This is not an exaggerating description of my anxiety, and if you ever fancy this is only a nightmare in the United States, I have to say that is only because you haven't heard those shared outcries in some other English speaking as well as some none English speaking countries: Who are these people?
You can totally hear all these from their confidence and proud about "we are from the same high school". Not a bit exaggerating.
至少是目前来说，同一所高中的对我来说意味着什么？
意味着如果我竟敢在一个传言可能和我财产有点关系的房子里来一个南师大附中同学校友聚会，场景将会是如此这般：客人陆续到来，房子里的东西就一点一点的失踪了，直到四面是墙为止，而房产证不知什么时候就已经换了一个主人了，房产证上那个原来的合法主人自己的银行账户可能在南师大附中聚会还未按计划结束之前就已经统统被取消也不存在了。
这还真不是对我现在这份惊恐地夸大描述，你要是以为这就只是在美国才有的恶梦般的惊恐，那只是因为你还没听说其他那些讲英语的或者不讲英语的国家里一些共同的干嚎：他们都是什么人啊？
所有这一切，你都可以从他们对于“来自同一所高中”所拥有的自信和骄傲里听到。一点都不夸张。
----Nov. 24th, 2018
I have heard Viagra has this confusion it was announced internally that "U.S. government sector" has determined to keep my reward from the Viagra to somebody who works for the pharmaceutical industry.
11-22-2018 Chinese Military's money and "No seeding related debt owed"（中国军费以及”没欠了下种费“）
1: Chinese Military's money
My answer is the same as the explanation given in this morning's broadcasting. If it already has been confirmed for certain that all those checks from the Chinese Military have been titled to the U.S. Military's unit(s) account name(s), please don't confuse as if my name Min Fang is the other name of the U.S. Military.
I never received a penny from the Chinese Military. All my medical expenses billings have been in my own name. This morning's confusion regarding this in the expression of “To live or to die, both heavy debt" was expressed by Pan, Li(潘莉), who is graduated the same class same year from the same Junior high school I graduated. The "senior of her good friend's husband" she mentioned is David Petraeus' father. She met this good friend of hers before 2004.
My medical treatment has been good, I was treated completely for a minor concern this morning, plus some routine regulars of course. As usual, my health has no concerns but annoyingness.
----Nov. 22nd, 2018
2: About the frustration of don't want to beg for money and anger where is their own money.
My answer will never change, my answer has been I have no idea where your money is, I am certain I don't have a penny of your own money. I don't ever need you to beg for my money, and I totally don't ever need you at all.
I am raised by my parents, not the other child from my same parents, not any of my parents' siblings nor their relatives.
I share all my grandfathers with my grandfathers' other children is a true statement of course, but all of my grandfathers never left any debt for me to pay is also a true statement. All of my grandfathers left no debt at all which means no debt at all for their seeding fees and their sexual intercourses fees that have associated with the births of all their offsprings.
My anger about their frustration is why after all these years after all my grandfathers' deaths (the last one died in 1965), how can they be so confused as if their own houses never had family inheriting at each generation's senior's death.
I was never told what my father had left behind after his 2013 "death" in China, it was in January of 2015 that I heard of my father's "2013 death".
----2018年11月22日。
11-21-2018 What are they challenging when knowing money ownership is according to Laws?
Heard of this morning's broadcasting about schools, I agree that other than most handsome tuition gift, enrolling to a college education program and a graduate education program is not the subject can be demanded as a token of the proven true romance favoritism.
11-20-2018 What same high school graduated means? Why some are in trouble? What trouble? （同一个高中毕业的对我意味着什么？）
Heard this morning's broadcasting about Treasury. I heard one is the same year same class graduated from the same high school, the other one is the younger generation from the same high school graduated. I heard the reason is they disagree this or that money should be considered my possible money is the reason they are in the trouble.
How could they possibly be in trouble just because they disagree I should be the one have some inherited money? Oh, I heard it is because they took actions to transfer the money out of the money's lawfully registered account owners' reach if they ever consider that maybe my possible money.
( Money Ownership by Laws, no need for special asking around who is the real owner. The lawfully registered account owner is the real lawful owner of the money in the account. 财产所有权由法律决定，不需到处询问谁才是财产的真正主人。合法登记的账户主人就是账户里财产的真正合法主人。----Nov. 19th, 2018 )
How about the graduate education story? I heard that is the husband to another same class same year graduated from the same high school person. The husband works for the agency location that I have huge complaints about the haughty attitudes beyond the gratitudes a commoner would expect from government employees, plus shared hostility against who I am but not romance related. This was since early 2015, not before. The wife works for another agency that I have complained as well, but I never send inquiries to her job-related offices or the in trouble same class one's husband's related offices, but only to her agency's legal office so that my complaints only related to the frustrations regarding where is the money that should have paid-out already to cover my living expenses.
I have been in freezing coldness since early 2015 because "Who the fxxx you think you are, we are all graduated from these same high school as well." In Boston, there are over 10 already for the same class or the same year, which not include their families nor those "just not the same year".
Just because they came from the same high school, they just have this attitude that they should make their desired decisions about my any possible money, but myself should just be a beggar compare to who they are. How could I possibly not in freezing coldness? I am not even allowed to receive government agency's food help, not allowed to request housing transfer, all because they came from the same high school I graduated over 30 years ago? I heard some of them are in positions to "do not allow". I heard about them only a couple of months ago, I have to say I am so lucky I am in the lawful United States. I just need to express myself as "who the fxxx they think they are" is my forever attitude towards them as well, and it is the same that they should never expect me to help out their troubles as well.
If you are known to your associated as alumni from this high school, but you are not aware that I am considered "this school's enemy deserved to be prosecuted by all alumni", please check if you are already a similar victim as well because alumni's participation is too high. Nothing particular happened in my high school years, my experiences in Boston are too abnormal , possibly under investigation. (如果你周围的人都知道你也是南师大附中毕业的，但你本人没听说我都已经是”这个学校的公敌而应该被所有校友所惩罚”之类的，请查一下你自己是否也已经是类似迫害事件的受害者，南师大附中毕业校友的参与程度高的实在是很吓人，我的高中三年没什么特别的事情，我在波城实在太某明奇妙的遭遇可能已在警方调查当中。）
Also, if in need to contact law enforcement, better contact other city's law enforcement. Locals can be very complicated or even a hostile community situation if already being a victim without knowing what happened. Best is through the online web page. Law enforcement professionals know how to handle such concerns. （还有，如果需要报警，最好是异地报警。当地人事关系可能很复杂甚至有可能都已经形成了纠帮成伙的敌意势力，特别是你自己什么都还不知道就已经损失惨重的情况。最好就是网上报警，警方专业人员很清楚应该如何处理这种担心。我的情况，我是在美国波士顿耶，毕业都已经三十多年了，一点联系都没有就某明奇妙被盯上了，看看有可能牵涉的，南京师范大学，南师大附中（高中，初中），南师大附小，南师大附属幼儿院，毕业的，转了学的，及其他们的家属）
听说有人抱怨说我这是在落井下石，为什么呀？就只是从同一所中学高中毕业的而已，还是三十几年前的1985年就已经高中毕业了，毕业后还是一点联系都没有，或者还不是同班甚至不是同届，我方敏也就是这一两个月才听说有他们这批人在我周围存在。他们对我方敏的态度居然是“就是不认可我方敏应该会有钱应该会有成就"。只要有可能是我方敏的钱，不管钱究竟放在谁的名字下面，他们就是敢直接拿走花掉。他们 就是乐意鄙视我方敏，就是乐意一定要让他们所有的美国同事都知道他们特别清楚我方敏就只是个讨饭的，怎么我方敏直说他们做了如此这些，才会有他们今天的麻烦，就成了我方敏对他们落井下石了？我方敏对他们的态度对他们的回答永远就是“你XX的又算老几？”我就是乐意接受美国法律的保护，我就是乐意看到美国是个法治国家，我方敏对他们所有的一切麻烦都永远不会同情永远不会伸手帮忙更永远不会提供任何协助。
----November 20th, 2018
有人说不管什么原因不管处境多难，我都不应该痛骂中国仇恨中国。我的回答是：请你先分清在你自己心目中，中国960万平方公里的领土是一个十三亿中国人民的共和国，还是你已经认可那960万平方公里土地其实已经是一些个别领导人事实上的共妻婚姻所赋予他们的共妻婚姻家庭的私有领土之后，再说清你的看法。我对中国一些国家领导人的痛骂，是非常明确的指名道姓公开痛骂，痛骂原因更是举世共知的非常明确毫不含糊，你为何会认为那是对中华人民共和国的仇恨？你为何会认为那是对中国十三亿人民的不耻？你为何会认为那是对中华民族的否定？
----November 20th, 2018
11-19-2018 My high school in Nanjing of China, my residence in Massachusetts of U.S.
This morning's broadcasting featured a female who was my classmate from high school. I heard there are total ten people of such same high school graduated in the same year are now state employees officed in Boston of Massachusetts, but none of them I have ever associated since high school graduation in 1985. We never had a high school reunion.
I heard it was featured a couple of months ago, it obviously was from their own expression that all of them have shared negativeness regarding who I have become or who I self-claimed have become, professionally and financially. I have been wondering for the reasons why their negativeness against who I have become can be so strong when I have not been associated for over 30 years which include all these years I stayed in Boston of Massachusetts. Well, as long as they are aware who they should appreciate are not friendly toward me, and now I am aware what my situation has been, well, I say as long as I am protected by the same laws effectively as well. For everyone else's curiosity, their sponsor Mrs. J R is maiden named Miss J O. I did hear it was once broadcasted there would be someone knows who I was every way I turn, I did have contacted laws regarding why I felt being stalked.
Well, to everyone if ever concerns what will be the situation, I never feel I should contact them for any of my troubles after I heard about them, so, that will remain the same. I heard it was broadcasted it is obviously impossible to fancy resourceless me can be a helping hand for them if in situations, well, I add my thoughts here frankly that I may not even have any willingness if what I have experienced have been more than just some negative thoughts from these never even associated since the year graduated from the same high school. This would be the same and applicable to everyone from my past.
Money Ownership by Laws, no need for special asking around who is the real owner. The lawfully registered account owner is rhe real lawful owner of the money in the account.
财产所有权由法律决定，不需到处询问谁才是财产的真正主人。合法登记的账户主人就是账户里财产的真正合法主人。
----Nov. 19th, 2018
爸爸妈妈：据说纽约情况类似，据说在美国政府机关做工的南师大附中毕业的，特别是同班同届毕业的，对我敌意都很大，请注意。什么事都别去找他们，遇上也就回避。听说过“（美国）要关起门来痛打方敏”，估计就是指的他们这些人或者就是他们说的。我们的生活费用及我的智慧产权收入都收不到，可能也和他们这些人有很大关系。
11-19-2018 怎样下载中文拼音打字
----2018年11月19日。
11-18-2018 与南京方面的矛盾 (4) ---- 南师大附中的住校生
因为不适应学校离家比较远，我在南师大附中念高一的时候曾经住校一年，住在里面其实只有一个学期，但床位是占了一年，高一下半学期，我是自己每天骑自行车上学，但铺盖留在学校床位上了。我在南京四中念初一时，也是如此。那时住校是有专门的老师分管的，也就是6：30AM吹哨起床有体育老师带着跑步做早操，然后就是自己独立了，也就是自己上课，上食堂，上晚自修，晚上9：00PM教室熄灯就自己回寝室就寝。我记得我住校时，因为没什么零花钱，这两个学校附近都是连个小吃店小卖部都没有，所以除了回家，都是在校园里待着。据说，我的那个没撤的床位是很多人根本不知道我去了哪里的原因。有段时间我每天放学就骑自行车回家了，晚上都没回寝室睡觉，但白天我会去寝室午睡一会儿。
我不太适应住校生活，就是因为从早到晚，都是学习时间，要么教室里坐着，或者宿舍里就一个人呆着，宿舍还没电。我觉得这充足的学习时间对我而言实在太长，一个星期里只要一天的晚自修就已经完成了我一个星期的学习时间，所以剩下几天，我可以回家，累点也没关系，反正回家不用念书。我就是这么逐渐适应了学校离家较远的初高中生活。
当时高中和我同班同届的住校生，可能不知道我去了哪里而产生过很多猜测，是造成我们班我们这一届的上下几届2004年听说了我的故事之后，认为我从不单纯的原因。我确实也没想过需要和她们说一声，但我当时只是初高中生又没钱，也从没想过除了回家，还有可能有那里可以去，我不在学校里，当然就是在家里了。当时分管住校的老师应该有问过，但没向她们解释，因为我有要求因为还不适应远程上学所以需要继续留着床铺，初高中都是如此。
还有就是高二下半学期时“向老师告了住校生的状“。我不是太清楚究竟是怎么回事，我汇报的也就是我当时很奇怪一个明显只读书的女生怎么也会为了一个老师结婚了而愤怒不已。这个老师是在我们高一时请假结的婚，替他代课的老师有宣布，当时都已经结婚一两年了。宣布的时候我还是高中部新生入学不久，又是近视眼不肯戴眼镜坐在最后一排，我们班的同学对他结婚消息是否有反应，我是完全不知情。
我和南师大附中住校生的矛盾可能是，我当时不是太懂所涉及的谈话，可能有谈到会涉及处分，我当时有说要是真需要处分谁谁，（当时不知是谁但认为应该也不会是那个让我觉得很奇怪的明显只念书的女生），可能会影响他们考大学，所以应该是悄悄地别影响他们高考。我听说他们好像对处分很愤怒，好像是认为是有意刁难。我只知道当时学校有调查，听说处分意见是在调查了几个月之后才决定的。据说那个“北京前女友”的长子（当时是刚离开上海的复旦大学回到了北京）也参与了当年的这场谈话。
至于我当时为何有机会告状，是否故意。当时不是特意告状，当时并不明白严重性，也就只是奇怪他们怎么给气成那样，都气得哆嗦了，实在是印象深刻。当时的”告状“机会是因为已经高二下半学期，面临高考分文理班，我高二当时的成绩也就只能努力努力可以保证考上大专，所以和我聊了聊。没想到我很自信，而且我介绍的学习方法也确实有效，高考成绩下来，我是我们班的女生成绩第一名。
*当年是我的三代爷爷捐款国民政府教育部以建立中国的中央大学系统是真实。我当时就可以出国念大学也是真实。我对在中国的大学教育很满意也是真实。
*当时，企业管理，经济学在中国是文科班学生才可以报考的专业。
----2018年11月18日。
11-17-2018 "Let us calculate your spending for you" (“让我来帮你算一下帐”）
Heard about this morning's "Let us calculate yous expenses budgeting for you" episode, well, I had heard some storie that this was the reason "your" high school classmates toughly demanded to read through "your" accounting books if "you" have any investments.
I heard there were some researches about this which concluded that these annoyingness are from those who have their own spending frustration, that their own living quality provided by the level of their own spending is not good as assumption based on their own income.
----Nov. 17th, 2018
我估计我自己面临的压力就是那生活费的5%，会有人要帮着算一下。
我听说了有很多朋友亲戚的都很关心究竟我什么时候可以收到我的生活费用给付。反正有5%在那里，类似是我送礼，他们当然会希望看看有没有可能提高点买房的档次，出国留个学等等。他们现在想知道，也在观望，看是不是该等一等买房计划。
我的态度是：我自己也学到了，就是别等但要实际。亲戚之类的需要买房，现在就买，别等，但实是在在的，按照自己现在的能力来买。等我收到生活费用给付，有了5%，也就是卖了这个房子再按自己心意买一个。有人说就是如果现在买了房子装修就有点费思量，其实不用。在美国，从房子设计装修的广告宣传来看，很明显美国人很实际，确实也都有也就是什么时候再买第二套房子的平常心。美国的房子装修规则：要是硬装，就是能够增加房子价值的，剩下的都是软装，可以自己带着走，直到自己确定愿意住在自己很满意的房子里看着自己的孩子从牙牙学语到已经上大学了又结婚生子了。
我自己以前也是一直在等什么时候可以结束流浪，我都已经玩腻了。还好，醒悟的还不算太迟，所以我是MBA已经快毕业了。虽然我的专向是企业经营的常务管理，不是财经，但我现在的学历是可以去找一份初级会计工作来学学理财的。我可能会找个零时工之类的学学会计记账，做作业时就学到了如何记账对企业资产负债表的影响很大。欧美国家的会计规章改革也就是加强记账的规范化。
说这么多，就是为了安慰一些关心我是否有能力管理那5%的一些焦躁不安，我可以管理，我也能够管理。不过我确实从未有过类似经验，虽然就是类似送亲戚朋友的礼钱，但也不希望让一些亲戚朋友觉得我送礼有点某明奇妙的厚此薄彼不太公平，所以我会有一些专业帮助来协助平衡。有这5%可以送礼，当然就会有这份专业帮助了。我会在网上以表格方式让亲戚朋友和我联系要求我送礼。😊😊
因为我是美国公民，所以会有美国35%的礼物税。比方说，如果礼物税的基数是每个收礼人一年一万美金（夫妻合计两万元），我会在给你送礼的礼钱通知单里告知，你今年的礼金已达一万美金（夫妻合计两万美金)，今年内的其他礼钱将扣除35%的美国礼品税，即一万一千美金的礼钱，实际收到的金额是一万六百五十美金。
还有，就是我不会安排以年金方式支付的礼钱。既然送礼，当然希望对方长寿，对方当然会希望自己的孩子可以继承这份年金支付方式的礼物，所有的亲戚朋友也都会喜欢这种礼物方式，但累积起来对定限只有5%的每年礼钱总额会是很大的压力，所以很不实际。而一次买断社保金或者退休金都是一次就至少涉及几十万，上百万人民币（美金）的交易，虽然买断后由社保进行投资会有利得但物价也会上涨，所以也不会是绝大多数的朋友都会认为很实际的送礼要求。至于亲戚，这个决定也是他们收到礼物后应该由他们自己做的。很现实啊，是买房自住收租，还是买社保拿每月的社保给付，他们自己决定啦。
请不要以为就只是同一个学校毕业的，就是可以要求送一份以退休年金给付方式的份子钱。在国内就没这规矩，你们在国内结婚都没资格享受这种待遇，在我这儿是会被当成敲诈勒索要求的。
听听我听到的“不给就是不行的”愤怒要求：就只是同一个学校毕业的，或着就只是见过一面而已（甚至一面都没见过，听也没听说过），也就只是想要一份可以在美国欧洲居住生活的退休金待遇而已，就只是想要至少是国内的一处房子而已。我是统统都以敲诈勒索报警。
还有，谁谁是我妈妈的什么亲戚，听说过没听说过，反正就是凭什么就是不可以由我给一份和我妈妈一样的退休金？我的回答：你死绝了都不会被大众认为需要通知我妈一声，我妈死绝了你也从没认为有什么了不起的，你哪来的这份资格对我要求要和我妈比？你就是一滩狗屎而已。
还有，和我父亲没有任何血缘关系就只是也姓方，凭什么不可以享受方家后人一样的待遇？我的回答：因为你和我不是同一个方家血脉的后人，我也没欠你钱。
还有就是这种，他是这人的丈夫，她是那人的妻子，那只是他们的妻子她们的丈夫在骂你踩你剁死你，并不是他们自己。但你必须给他们一个面子，必须和她们的丈夫他们的妻子做个朋友，不可以对她们的丈夫他们的妻子不客气，否则就是难以理解。
我的回答：你的丈夫你的妻子不需要给你个面子就可以对我骂东骂西，我有机会抽你丈夫抽你妻子耳光子时，也没有任何需要给你个面子迟疑一分钟。我这辈子都不会长出一条男人阳具出来，我也就永远不会有任何需要会考虑给你一个什么吊面子。理解不理解，我都只是“特别愿意用一把厨房的砍刀向你们这群婊子养的头上砍去！！！”
----2018年11月17日
还有就是89年高校会议，我方敏没有因为参加89年高校会议得到任何私人好处，也从未向中国政府要求因为89年高校会议而奖励补偿，更不会因为参加了89年的高校会议就欠了任何其他参加会议者什么钱款。
按照各国的军法，都是以杀人罪名处理对平民开枪的本国军人。中国军法也是如此。89年处理学运时动用军队而不适用该项中国军法条款，就是因为中国政府的决定是出于一切为了国家人民利益，无任何私人利益。我方敏当时只是上海一个非军事院校的学生，作为参与会议的一名非军方非政府非决策人士，不管这一届中国中央政府对当时的中国中央政府对89年学运处理意见的看法如何，都是哪里轮得到由我来赔偿?
当时可能是和当时的北京市长陈希同聊天谈到等我学会了做生意，会带着大家一起做大生意，2004年我对中国的贡献都是大生意，也就是都已经兑现了。我听说了中国利润丰厚的地铁系统投资大户都是社保，公务员退休金及军人退休金。任何对此的误解和分歧都从来不应该是陈希同的家人居然通过广播剧上公开骂我是个婊子破鞋没人要的烂货的原因和理由。我也从不认为和一个中国的国家领导人生了一个私生子女就是可以在一个由宪法决定还是一个共和国的中国可以升官发财的骄傲。我从未因为参加了89年高校会议就欠了陈希同一家的。
----2018年11月17日
11-15-2018 为何我似乎已经不再在乎舆论？
都已经宣布了智慧产权收入的合法拥有权是正在进行中的法律调查了，也就是说我为何某明奇妙的，就被中国的李克强总理是否是为了喷红他自己的老婆程虹成为国家栋梁人才，才利用广播剧将我宣布成为全世界共知的“就只是一个假冒伪造剽窃者，就只是一个没人要的戏子而已"这一类的社会舆论应该也都是已经在调查期间了，这应该是我名誉恢复所需要的第一步吧。至于中国政府究竟在这事件中间扮演的是什么角色，演的什么戏，也都应该会撇清。
11-02-2018 中国政府组织的广播剧”宣布“演出的得益者及受害人
何况，现在都已经是调查是否是有些图财害命的因素在所有这些喧嚣里面了，还有一堆谁谁的财产是否也被卷走的调查，谁还有精力在乎社会舆论？我是很安分地在说，我已经被法律所保护，所以就很安安静静了。名誉及社会舆论的纠正至少是在人身和财产都已经安全以后的事情了，我再在乎名誉，我都必须实事求是的分清轻重缓急。何况，舆论制造是否是这一切可能犯罪事件的原因，环境，或者甚至是否是在掩护犯罪行为都必须先撇清，才有可能说舆论是否是在法律监督下的公正社会舆论，才有可能说是否有条件在意社会舆论的导向，才有可能谈是否可以纠正不实社会舆论。
----2018年11月16日。
江苏广播电台系统什么时候开始才参与广播剧的制作播出？为何现在的矛盾似乎是”为何忽略江苏广播电台系统才是这个广播剧的创意制作单位“?
我所知道的，广播剧制作创意是在2004年的7月1日，所谈内容包括这一部真实剧将由美国广播公司Clear Channel的106.7FM波段负责制作及播出事宜。
制作以我为主要人物的人物传记型真实广播剧是因为我在当天自己出资购买了我自己从出生就开始记录的保安影带记录而引发。我当时认为很适合作为传记型真实剧的语音资料，我成为主要人物是因为广播公司同意我所自荐的我有平淡却内容丰富的生活经历，而且所涉及的语音资料是在被我所购得的保安影带记录里。
我参加那天的电讯会议是由我自己的信托律师所安排，不是由洛克菲勒家的任何人所邀请，会议所涉及的主要内容也都和洛克菲勒家的任何人无关。所购保安影带也是由我自己的信托所支付（就是由我今年（2019年）健康及生活费用给付的同一家付款公司所支付的），不是由洛克菲勒家的任何人所支付的。
听说我在南京四中的初中同班同学，当时在前线歌舞团做歌唱演员的潘莉在2004年以前就认识了Holly Knowlton是造成江苏方面对广播剧为何以我为主要人物造成误会的原因。我当时没被告知潘莉在场是我未向她打招呼的原因。当时在场的我的同学同届以及校友都很多，上医的，美国桥口大学的，等等，实在很多可能是我未被一一告知的原因。
----2018年11月16日。
11-15-2018 和父系母系的血缘关系矛盾----什么是我理解的亲戚关系？
我一直说，我2004年继承以后愿意给我父亲的弟妹们一份礼物，是因为他们把我当亲戚。那为什么其他人就不是亲戚？
我在上海念大学五年，当时既无电话也无电邮，如果我想探访亲戚混个晚饭，根本就没有可能事先问一句我父亲在上海的两个妹妹是否有空接待我，而是在下午时分，算好晚餐时间可以到达就直接跳上汽车上门蹭饭去。我父亲上海的两个妹妹都是基本上从未替我特意购买过食材，但我父亲的小妹妹家里就特别明显，从不藏好吃的。不知他们背后有没有龇牙咧嘴的，但是如果有我喜欢吃的蛏子等等，都是在桌上一起吃，我常常还是吃的最多的。所以我说他们是把我当亲戚。听我父亲谈起他小时候的经历，我相信我爷爷的弟妹也是如此把我父亲当亲戚的。
我不清楚现在他们是否也是愤怒的一家。如果如此，我不能理解的就是，为什么他们就是不问法律，坚持认为我是窝藏了家里的钱？我爷爷当年没给我父亲一分钱，我父亲从未抱怨过他们这些弟妹根本就是闷了家里的钱，而他们作为我父亲弟妹，也从未认为他们有愧于我父亲，也就是认为是我爷爷自己的意愿没打算给我父亲什么财产，和他们能有什么关系。怎么现在我继承了我爷爷给我的钱，就成了我闷了家里的钱偷了他们的东西？
我爷爷替我设立的信托，1948年设立时的规模一共就只有一千五百百万美金，我2004年继承后愿意送给他们的礼物规模是每家八千万美金（五亿人民币）。作为亲戚，我给他们的礼物是很丰厚的，态度也很好，没有一点对不起他们的。现在可能因为都已经各自有家了，据说闹得很凶，我也就是随缘了。
我听说的一些愤怒还有更让我难以理解的，就是所谓的对等关系。比如，当年我是可以上他们家和他们父母（夫妻）一起在同一张饭桌上吃饭的，现在他们就必须和我夫妻小孩一张饭桌上吃饭，否则就是不行。为什么？这些人是想和我这个亲戚一起进餐，还是想要有机会可以操我男人生个孩子出来？
还有，我听说的要求还有更离谱的。在我母亲的大姐领养她自己的小孩以前，也就是说，只是在我十一，十二岁之前，如果我在他们家里玩的开心了，我是可以睡在我母亲的大姐夫妻家里的一张备用小床上的，现在他们领养的小孩作为他们自己的小孩，就是必须要可以随时睡在我夫妻家里的同一套房子的某一张床上，否则就是不行。为什么？我母亲的大姐一家在他们领养了他们自己的小孩以后，如果我们去做客，他们家是好东西不上桌好东西藏起来早就已经是天经地义，就只是在表达这是他们自己的家而我们只是几个做客的她的穷妹妹的小孩这么一个立场而已。我是一点没在乎过他们家的立场表达。我现在已经也表达了我自己的立场，早就已经不欠他们家的了，从我十一二岁开始，就只认为他们家是个亲戚而已。我母亲”去世”以后，他们家对我母亲2006年的“去世”，一副“总算是少了个讨饭的，可以省点开销”的态度让我也早已不再当他们一家是亲戚了。
从1988年失去工作，中间做做会计临时工，直到“2006年去世”，我母亲都一直是由我父亲中国科学院的高额退休金养着的。他们一家对我母亲的接济，也就是因为这些都已经是经年的矛盾，在我母亲“去世”后，都由我父亲用他替我母亲存下的生活费用还清了。我父亲比我母亲年长了十岁，身体也一直不是很好，从我母亲失去正式工作的1988年，我父亲就开始省吃俭用，替我母亲存下了她如果需要自己一个人生活的未来生活保障。我父亲2006年时就是用这笔钱还清的。我是1990年开始工作的，我弟弟是1988年开始工作的。
----2018年11月15日。
11-13-2018 Who should I appreciate after graduation? (和同班同届的矛盾是什么？)
There has been a lot of anger regarding my "bad attitude" towards those graduated from the same schools. And I have my anger as well, they are alumni from the same school is a true statement, but they are not my personal friends is also a true statement as well. I should and I do appreciate the school I received education from, but why should I appreciate those individual alumni I never even heard of?
A lot of complaints are about me being somebody if having big investments, I should arrange some job opportunities for the same school alumni, it is very common everywhere. This is true, and I have no problem with it, but I think my appreciation should be towards the school I graduated from, not any individual alumni I never even heard.
The huge problem I have with some Chinese graduated from the Bridgeport University is similar. A lot stronger anger from them because we had graduated several years already in 2004 when they heard that I have some resources as a way to put it decently because they never believed I could have any inheriting. I had a huge problem with this anger of "deserved to have a job donated to work for" from this group and an even bigger problem with those same-school-graduated from China whose anger is "deserved to get paychecks or equivalent for just being the same school graduated".
I had five years of programming work experience already in 2004, that I knew it was impossible for those who had graduated for several years without engineering work experience to compete with newly graduated. On July 1st of 2004, I was talking about the software industry started to have a new trend to pay attention to quality assurance which was my first profession. I heard that after I found my job of quality assurance in July of 2004, a lot of this group of Bridgeport University graduated Chinese had all heard that it would be a great job market if they could check out information about software(application) quality assurance jobs. I heard the huge complaints and anger after 2004-2005 has been they don't know where and how to find such jobs which pissed me off enormously.
Some said other communities' alumni have another issue with me which is why I don't like to mention it was the University of Bridgeport I graduated from. My frustration has been why I need to mention? The entire time, it has been on my resume whenever I am presenting everything I am good at in Computer Science.
The same is the Shanghai Medical University, which I have mentioned I a lot more because my class of pharmacology major had the privilege to share the entire set of the Basic Medical System courses with the medicine major, which means I learned how to diagnose and treat a lot of common diseases from this education, but short of rich clinic experiences if compare to a practicing family doctor.
Similar anger from those graduated from the same high school or junior high school in Nanjing:
Since my college graduation in 1990:
1: Why you don't like to mention the Shanghai Medical University you graduated from, is it because you had been pretty shabby there? (My frustration: Why would I talk to you about people and things you never heard of?)
2: How could it possible that you don't fancy guys from the same high school? (My frustration: Haven't you ever met anyone else from some places else?)
Since my inheriting in 2004:
1: Why is it wrong to spend some of "your" money? We know you got nothing to do with those rich men already. We have Nanjing Automobile Group Co., Ltd (南汽) locally in Nanjing. (My frustration: I never thought local American could possibly know so much less about local American riches than Nanjingese in China? )
2: How come you forgot we graduated from the same (junior) high school? (My frustration: Other than "What do you mean?", what else can I put in words?)
----Nov 13th, 2018
爸爸，你的“被开除军籍”处分，很多不是勘探兵的现役和退伍军人都没听懂，不知道那是部队对于你们几个受影响的人最合适的安排和最安全的保护，他们都认为那是很严重的处分，我听说有很多人甚至认为中国方面2013年对你的态度其实是在执行军事法庭当年的处罚，我已经就我所知道的在我的博文里做了解释，在很多人还没听说过我的解释也不太弄得明白的情况下，多小心。
我听说的是，那个观测站一年有七个月是深埋在厚沙下面，只有通气口，没有任何光线，观测站除了观测设施，没有任何其他物品也没有多余空间，只能容纳一人。广播局所报道的几个人当时都是已经连续三年单人驻扎如此恶劣环境，全部都已经有了心理已经难以承受如此环境的临床心理症状。我的解释博文如下。
I heard a lot of veterans and enlisted who have not been mapping specialist did not understand the featured story about my father's dishonorable release. What I heard is: The observatory is located in the area that covered by thick sands seven months each year, not natural light nor electric, no extra space other than limited space for equipment and one person. I heard all of those featured person in that episode had developed psychological symptoms of unbearable-ness after three years consecutive one-person's assignment in such observatory. Following was my original explanation about this "dishonorable discharge".
----March 21st, 2019
11-12-2018 My father's Related ---- Military Dishonorable Release （和我父亲有关的 ---- 被开除军籍的处分）
Military Dishonorable Release （被开除军籍的处分）
My father got a dishonorable release from Chinese Military after his five years service, including three years in a one person's observatory deep and deep in the desert, what could possibly the misconduct he did that cost him such? He disobeyed the order of an extended another three years at the same post. 我父亲在中国军队服役五年，包括在沙漠无人区观测站一个人驻扎整整三年，却是被开除军籍离开中国人民解放军的。我父亲究竟做了什么违反军纪的事情，会导致如此严重处分？我听说当时是因为我父亲违抗军令拒绝再在同一个沙漠观测站再待三年。
That post locates near the spot where famous scientist Peng, Jiamu went missing June of 1980, a supposed one year's post. My father was the first person assigned to this post for three years and was ordered to stay for another three years prompted my father's disobeying. The Marshall Court's ruling was my father got dishonorable release and his direct commander(assigner) went in himself for three years. （那个观测站就位于著名的科学家彭家木1980年6月失踪的沙漠地区，本应是一个任命为期一年的无人区观测站。我父亲是第一个奉令驻扎三年的军人，他被同一个长官命令再在同一个观察站驻扎三年是我父亲拒绝执行该军令的原因。当年的军事法庭裁决是我父亲因不执行军令被开除军籍，他的长官自己进该沙漠无人区观察站驻扎三年。）
I heard in my father's commanding chain, my father's direct commander was the only person who never had any assignment nor experience to work in a desert post was the reason for the entire matter.（我听说我父亲的整个上级领导单位里，只有这个顶头上司从未有过奉令驻守沙漠观察站或者类似的沙漠无人区工作经验，是整个事件及处理意见的原因。）
That post located in a real no man's land that no one can survive after three-days walking on feet. I heard my father's commander was re-assigned after a year. I heard that post was changed to a group post after my father's commander staying. I heard this was the featured broadcasted when my father's military experienced was first featured over 8 years ago that a lot of civilian audiences did not get. （那个观测站位于沙漠无人区内，没人可以在步行三天后还能存活。我听说我父亲的长官是在一年以后被调离该观察站。我听说自从我父亲的长官被调离后，那个观测站被调整成了小组观测站。我听说这是八年多以前我父亲从军经历首次播出时的故事，但好像是很多没当过兵的普通老百姓统统都没听懂的故事。）
Why my father never complain if this Marshall Court ruling was unfair? Possibly, my father felt more comfortable this is the ruling that makes no one can keep him in Chinese Military to have any such assignment anymore. My father was a Mapping specialist that had one year's military training which required for a minimum 5 years service but eligible to be extended to 20 years if his release request not approved.（为什么我父亲从未抱怨军事法庭的如此裁决对我父亲是否公平？我估计，我父亲可能是认为这个裁决一下来，就没人可以让他再留在军队里，再给他类似的工作安排。我父亲当时是观测兵，属部队培训的技术兵种，至少需服役五年，但可延长至20年。服役期间如想离开部队需申请转业，转业申请如不批准就不得离开部队，直到20年的最高服役期满。）
----Nov. 12th, 2018
Should the rumored man who seeded in my younger brother's marriage the same equal husband in his marriage?
My response: I have nothing to do with my younger brother's marriage. If that male should be the same equal husband in my younger brother's marriage is never my business. I have refused to be associated with my younger brother's marriage family, which of course includes no association with any matter related to if my younger brother's marriage should have another same equal husband because of a birth child.
那个给我弟弟的老婆下种的男人是否应该被认为是我弟弟婚姻里另一个应该平等权利的丈夫？
我的回答：我和所有这些人及事都是一点关系都没有。那个男的是不是我弟弟婚姻里的二房丈夫都和我无关。我早就已经拒绝和我弟弟的婚姻家庭之间的任何关系，当然也就是已经包括了拒绝了所有任何一切和我弟弟的婚姻相关的事宜，以及·他的婚姻是否应该平等对待已经生了个亲生孩子的另一房丈夫的事宜。
----Nov. 12th, 2018
11-11-2018 Confusion regarding "Exactly, how you got money?"
I heard this morning's broadcasting covered a foul play how a $4Billion (四十亿美金) being deprived by a mother of a portrait child. This $4Billion was the amount added up since 2007's $500, 000 (五十万美金) which has nothing to do with my $400Million medical plus $400Million living per year for five years which includes this fiscal year of 2019.
Some related stories I heard:
The featured rich had a car accident related surgery years ago, which had changed his appearance from obvious well-structured 3D Western to an obvious much flatter 2D Asian, he even got a famous portrait to record this transformational change in his life. This mother of his portrait child was the person who had brought one portrait child from China to present to him. I heard he was presented for four such portrait children, all do not carry his blood but resemble his famous portrait to the extreme. *3D (立体）2D（平面）
I heard confusion sparked by this morning's broadcasting is how I got my handsome money without any legal trouble. Well, my side story is all these what I already have written on my web blog which is my own money I inherited.
Related confusions are:
1: What taxes I paid for all these money which have accumulated for over $4Billion already?
My response: I heard all paid in full of investor taxes. Some said none of these paid-in-fulls are taxed in my name in IRS, not in the pseudonym names either.
I know for certain it has been clarified that those not-pseudonym-names do not own that taxed money nor the paying companies according to laws, I don't know what is the confusion but I know I am not expected to pay further taxes. And I assume it is the same for those spending I paid for my biological children and my both parents.
* According to the United States tax laws, that 5% I intended to gift my relatives and friends are expected for gift taxes from those gift-recipients. I am not expected to pay such gift tax for the accumulated over $4Billion paid-out I have received or am expecting to receive.
----Nov. 11th, 2018
我来美国之前有打过一个电话给我以前南京四中同班的潘莉，当时她是南京前线歌曲团的，我也就是告诉她我要赴美，没有其他的，更没有争执过。到美国后还未曾与她联系过。不知为何说我恨她。
我1996年到达美国纽约后身上还有一千七百美金，吃住当时不用付费，我也在一个月内就已经在餐馆拿学徒收银员的一千美金一月的工资了，一个月后就已经是美月一千八百美金的工资。我从未因为筹措美国路费而对她不满，一点都没有。我当时国内筹款很顺利，而且当时在国内就已经知道出国目的的筹款利息会很高（同币种，至少是1：1.5，高一点就是1：2，而且要在一年左右还清）。我是1996年5月拿到护照，9月拿到签证，10月1日左右的飞机票赴美。
我当初出国借的钱都还清了，按同币种1：1.5在一年半左右后由我父亲出面在1997年年底左右替我还清借款。是谁在说同学之间可以随便拿钱不用归还？我从来没听说过。
南师大附中的傅萍？1996我帮她卖过一次婴儿尿裤。当时她因为没有生意经验，开价很高，根本就没有任何销售提成可拿，她给我的进货底价是￥1.6，销售医院等的卖价才￥1.3左右，从医院小卖部购买是自费，价格更便宜。当时国内又没有什么富豪只在乎小孩撒尿用品的质量。她自己也知道当时的情况是能把她进的那批货给卖出去就很好（她开出的清仓价是￥1.46）。她当时一共就付了我￥1500，我以为是销售提成，我会再核实。我当天也已经按她要求，把送货单子包括还未收款的记录全部交给了她，她当时愿意自己催款，我是因为要忙出国所以也愿意少操点心。因为每个货箱的体积是1立方米，无法用自行车送货，也很难让药检所当时的司机帮我送货，所以都是由傅萍找便宜的三轮车送货。
----2018年11月11日
11-10-2018 What else about Nanjing ---- 与南京方面的矛盾（3）
----The high school I graduated from
Nanjing Teacher's College Affiliated School (南京师范大学附属中学) I graduated from in 1985, has been the No.1 school in Jiangsu Province where Nanjing is the capital city. Historically, Jiangsu and Zhejiang Provinces are both famous for talents population since Ming and Qing dynasties. which possibly is the reason this No. 1 middle school has been hot and popular for the education it can provide. This school has been famous for its 100% college-enrollment rate (including community colleges) as well
Since 1950 or so in China, a college student needs to transfer his or her city-registry into the school if enrolled for job-assigning convenience upon graduation, but this policy is not applicable to any high school student even if the high school can offer boarding convenience.
The high school I graduated from has been a boarding high school that can offer over 10% of its total 1800 enrolled students in any given school year, but it does not have the admission policy to enroll any student outside Nanjing city. Now, one can imagine this is the high school has the great convenience to enroll any associated from any city of entire China. And, no one would imagine who is also graduated from this same high school if a high school diploma or record is not required for a college-graduated job seeker or a colleague. Nanjing Fourth Middle School that I graduated from in 1982 (Junior high) has been a similar boarding school as well.
Obviously, this has been my situation: Tons of undercovered same school graduated are sharing some mysterious missions to co-fight against me.
But, what puzzles me is what has bonded them together? And how?
----November 10th, 2018
我来美国之前有打过一个电话给我以前南京四中同班的潘莉，当时她是南京前线歌曲团的，我也就是告诉她我要赴美，没有其他的，更没有争执过。到美国后还未曾与她联系过。不知为何说我恨她。
我1996年到达美国纽约后身上还有一千七百美金，吃住当时不用付费，我也在一个月内就已经在餐馆拿学徒收银员的一千美金一月的工资了，一个月后就已经是美月一千八百美金的工资。我从未因为筹措美国路费而对她不满，一点都没有。我当时国内筹款很顺利，而且当时在国内就已经知道出国目的的筹款利息会很高（同币种，至少是1：1.5，高一点就是1：2，而且要在一年左右还清）。
我当初出国借的钱都还清了，按同币种1：1.5在一年半左右由我父亲出面替我还清借款。是谁在说同学之间可以随便拿钱不用归还？我从来没听说过。
南师大附中的傅萍？1996我帮她卖过一次婴儿尿裤。当时她因为没有生意经验，开价很高，根本就没有任何销售提成可拿，她给我的进货底价是￥1.6，销售医院等的卖价才￥1.3左右，从医院小卖部购买是自费，价格更便宜。当时国内又没有什么富豪只在乎小孩撒尿用品的质量。她自己也知道当时的情况是能把她进的那批货给卖出去就很好（她开出的清仓价是￥1.46）。她当时一共就付了我￥1500，我以为是销售提成，我会再核实。我当天也已经按她要求，把送货单子包括还未收款的记录全部交给了她，她当时愿意自己催款，我是因为要忙出国所以也愿意少操点心。因为每个货箱的体积是1立方米，无法用自行车送货，也很难让药检所当时的司机帮我送货，所以都是由傅萍找便宜的三轮车送货。
----2018年11月11日
江苏广播电台系统什么时候开始才参与广播剧的制作播出？为何现在的矛盾似乎是”为何忽略江苏广播电台系统才是这个广播剧的创意制作单位“?
我所知道的，广播剧制作创意是在2004年的7月1日，所谈内容包括这一部真实剧将由美国广播公司Clear Channel的106.7FM波段负责制作及播出事宜。
制作以我为主要人物的人物传记型真实广播剧是因为我在当天自己出资购买了我自己从出生就开始记录的保安影带记录而引发。我当时认为很适合作为传记型真实剧的语音资料，我成为主要人物是因为广播公司同意我所自荐的我有平淡却内容丰富的生活经历，而且所涉及的语音资料是在被我所购得的保安影带记录里。
我参加那天的电讯会议是由我自己的信托律师所安排，不是由洛克菲勒家的任何人所邀请，会议所涉及的主要内容也都和洛克菲勒家的任何人无关。所购保安影带也是由我自己的信托所支付（就是由我今年（2019年）健康及生活费用给付的同一家付款公司所支付的），不是由洛克菲勒家的任何人所支付的。
听说我在南京四中的初中同班同学，当时在前线歌舞团做歌唱演员的潘莉在2004年以前就认识了Holly Knowlton是造成江苏方面对广播剧为何以我为主要人物造成误会的原因。我当时没被告知潘莉在场是我未向她打招呼的原因。当时在场的我的同学同届以及校友都很多，上医的，美国桥口大学的，等等，实在很多可能是我未被一一告知的原因。
----2018年11月16日。
Should the rumored man who seeded in my younger brother's marriage the same equal husband in his marriage?
My response: I have nothing to do with my younger brother's marriage. If that male should be the same equal husband in my younger brother's marriage is never my business. I have refused to be associated with my younger brother's marriage family, which of course includes no association with any matter related to if my younger brother's marriage should have another same equal husband because of a birth child.
那个给我弟弟的老婆下种的男人是否应该被认为是我弟弟婚姻里另一个应该平等权利的丈夫？
我的回答：我和所有这些人及事都是一点关系都没有。那个男的是不是我弟弟婚姻里的二房丈夫都和我无关。我早就已经拒绝和我弟弟的婚姻家庭之间的任何关系，当然也就是已经包括了拒绝了所有任何一切和我弟弟的婚姻相关的事宜，以及·他的婚姻是否应该平等对待已经生了个亲生孩子的另一房丈夫的事宜。
----Nov. 12th, 2018
南京第四中学，南师大附中所相关的：
我16岁高一那年在学校里“拍电影”过程，只有我们二班的男女生看见过，没有任何别的班的人。我们班女生对我态度一直很排斥，我也没在意过。因为和她们很少接触，都是上学来放学就回家，课间几分钟上上厕所外面转转就又上课了。
据说南京四中，南师大附中都是一些国家领导人的恋爱班底，和我可能是同届，同班或者就只是同校毕业。就算是同班的也从无交往，也就是她家里死了人甚至她自己死了她丈夫死了，都不会有人认为需要通知我一声，而我家里死绝了也不会和他们有任何交往的这种同班而已。可怎么就成了针对我的仇恨了？非的杀了我一家才能表达他们才是真爱？还必须从我这里拿钱以明确谁才是最爱，还不给就是不行？
都听到这些国家政府军队的领导人在广播剧里的明确宣言：身上都是长了个阳具，就是对你屁股没有兴趣，所以中华人民共和国不需要你，别指望你够资格打个电话给我。
我方敏的回应就是：我身上就没长出个阳具让你够资格和我要钱，我身上就没长出过一条阳具让你够资格向我宣布你居然长了条阳具操过女人。你们这群偷吃扒拿坑蒙拐骗的杂种货，有多远就滚多远，你他妈的以为你自己是谁啊？我就没长出个阳具需要摸摸你们操过的女人屁股，更不会需要你们这群婊子养的杂种狗屎。
都说我说话很粗鲁，那你说我还有别的的话需要说嘛？
我身上真是没有长了一条男人阳具，不会没了女人屁股摸摸就活不下去，请不要把我幻想成男人，没有了你们这些女人能得不行的屁股就没法过日子，否则怎么你们就认定你们自己是个女的，就凭着有女人奶子屁股就可以对我幺三和四的，这辈子肯定吃定我了？我身上真是没有长了一条男人阳具，我真的永远不需要你们，永远不需要。----2018年11月9日。
----2018年11月10日。
---- 和我父亲的有关的
1）童家母女据说是今天早上播出的一个聚焦。
她们是我们家住在鼓楼街时候的邻居，我们家住二楼，他们家住4楼，直到1990年搬迁分开。期间对我母亲王博贤态度从来都是话很少但始终友善，我母亲也知道童家妈妈是我父亲的大学同学，和我父亲都是在1990年左右就退休了，其后很少见面。童家妈妈是经常会和我父亲说我父亲实在太宠我的一个，但从来都是让我感觉友善，没打算建议我父亲给我来个家规伺候。
我听说童家母女今天早上所表达的观点是
I）方文海必须把北京东路的房子过户给儿子；
估计有点误会，因为这实在不象是我所认识邻居了二十多年的童家妈妈，童家大女儿和我一样大。何况她们在1990年以后也不再是我们家邻居了，童家妈妈和我爸爸又都是君子之交淡如水的中科院社交风格，平时也没有什么互相探访之类的。
至于她们担心我老说我自己有钱会让他们很麻烦，这就是他们多虑了。据说他们现在也是在美国生活，应该很清楚美国也就是一切遵守法律就可以，我说什么也都是我自己的法律责任了。
2）南京大学的方教授。
我从未听我父亲提起过这个教授，我自己虽在南京生活学习多年也从未听说过。最近听说这个教授，可能是因为他也姓方，而且可能和我有7等亲以上的血缘关系，对我的财产继承持“坚决就是不同意”的立场。我在网上查了一下，方教授是1938年出生，南京大学天文系1959年毕业留校的；而我父亲是1932年出生，1957年才入学南京大学天文系，所以方教授可能曾经以年幼之资做过我父亲的老师助教之类的。
据说我父亲在南京大学也是不良故事多多。当年我父亲上大学可能有工资，所以听到的都是对我父亲的抱怨，比如我父亲总是去学校会计室抱怨怎么又克扣了他的什么补贴或者别人又某明奇妙的提领了他的什么钱，我父亲总是嫌学校不给他分配单间宿舍等等，曾被南京大学作为不良退伍军人典范进行批评教育。
听说今天早上提到了“北京的前女友”是南大毕业，但不是天文系毕业的。我很奇怪这个方教授他们几个怎么会认为“北京前女友”的小孩会和我父亲有关？我已经听说她的第一个孩子可能和丁姓私人助理有关。我听说她是被丁姓私人助理（小学毕业文化）作为恋爱女友邀请并在晚餐饭桌上介绍给我爷爷认识的，我父亲当时在场听说后非常吃惊但未发一言，事后也未到处宣扬。当时丁姓私人助理的妻子小孩也都在场，她是和丁姓私人助理一家坐在一起，我父亲是和我爷爷一起坐在圆形饭桌的另一边。
我还听说方教授也和每月一万美金故事有关，这可能是方教授的小孩对我宣称我自己是爷爷信托唯一受益人所以有钱而非常愤怒的原因；方教授的小孩可能也是南师大附中毕业的，据说也是胆子大的吓死人。
财产继承及拥有权是由法律所决定的，是由爷爷的遗嘱所决定的。方教授一家为什么不询问法律是否他们一家的合法权益被我所侵犯？财产的法律拥有权不是我宣布宣布就可以归我所有的，财产的法律拥有权也不是方教授一家“坚决就是不同意”就可以更改的。我有钱没钱都和他们没关系，更何况国外也都承认我是有继承了爷爷们给我的信托，公司也都认可我的信托有投资份额是我被公司容让而可以自称自己“是法国投资者”的原因。英国名流名嫒在2015年圣诞节的“宣布拥有”没有法律上的效应，也是因为财产的所有权是由法律所决定的，任何一家公司的合法拥有者投资公司都不是广播剧的话筒或者中国政府出资英国名嫒挂名的“电视广告及滚动字幕播出”所任意更改的。
方教授一家都是南京大学的，南京大学是有法律院的，应该可以向方教授一家解释解释继承和信托的相关法律，南京大学也是有商学院的，也应该可以向方教授一家解释公司注册，公司所有权，及公司会计规章制度的相关法律法规的。
----2018年11月8日
11-09-2018 与南京方面的矛盾（2）
都是同一个爷爷的孩子，为什么不可以从这个信托里拿钱？
我的回答：因为这个信托是爷爷替我（女掌）一个人设立的。就像方智仁爷爷在香港替我设立的信托（即李家信托或李氏信托），方智仁爷爷已在信托设立委托书里写明是只给其长子方文海所出的女掌一个人的，所以包括我父亲方文海自己在内，所有方智仁的其他子女统统都是没有一分钱的份额。我所继承的其他信托也是如此同样明确指定了我是唯一受益人。所以，这个有着美国公司汇款每月生活费一万美金故事的信托也是我（女掌）一个人的信托，和我所继承的其他信托一样，都是其他所有方家后人统统没有一分钱的份额。
我方敏拒绝我自己合法继承的这些信托被偷窃抢劫洗钱，我的这些信托所投资国家的金融会计制度和法规，以及我的这些信托所投资公司的管理规章等等，都是所有方家后人统统都不可以从我方敏的这些信托里及所投资的公司里擅自用钱拿钱的原因。
“都是同一个爷爷的孩子”从来不是一些方家后人可以擅自从任何一家公司偷窃抢劫钱财甚至通过高科技抢劫洗钱而破坏社会金融及法律秩序的借口原因及理由，我方敏本人就这些情形报警也从未犹豫过。再次强调，我方敏是合法继承了这些爷爷替我方敏一个人设立的这些信托，从不是偷窃了什么方家共同钱财，我方敏也绝不是因此就处于欠了方家任何一个后人一分一毫的处境。
为什么这是南京方面的矛盾？国内外南师大附中毕业生对所谓“就是一定要拿到钱，就是不准方敏花钱，否则就不配说自己也是南师大附中毕业的”的认同及参与程度实在太高，实在是不择手段到了以疯狂来形容都不为过的程度。
听说过有美国财政部的华人雇员说不应该认为那几个4亿美金是方敏自己的钱而应该认为是付款企业捐款给所有人？南师大附中毕业的。
听说过波士顿地区的那几个华人政府雇员说方敏根本不配有钱的？南师大附中毕业的，和我还都是同班或同届。
听说过有个高调宣布就是敢用高科技电脑技术不允许包括美国社安署在内的任何机构给我钱的那个？也是南师大附中毕业的。
。。。
他们个个都是吓死人的就是敢哎，所以我也不会回避来问一句，南师大附中毕业的对方敏这份仇恨是什么原因造成的？我高中毕业后就没怎么回过南师大附中，与我同班毕业的那些人也很少联络，同届的就不认识几个。
我只知道南师大附中毕业的，以前大专还是免费教育那会儿，女生绝大多数都是大专毕业，没什么本事考上的学校又不怎么样，还整天傲兹傲兹自己是南师大附中毕业的，就是能得个不行，这在南京市是有名的，南京十中毕业的都没这样。我和我们班及我们这届毕业的接触不多，对这点不是太清楚。我和我们班的很多女生从读书时候起就谈不到一起是真实。
还有，就是造势说我妈妈就是不可能不需要人陪伴，必须签合同可以让这个那个住进我妈妈家里由我妈妈养着，处得好不好都得让我妈妈看着他们的脸色，花大把钱养他们一辈子。是不是指望和当年的丁姓私人助理似的，从要求一起吃个好一点的饭店晚餐开始，再想办法不准我妈妈爸爸用他们自己的钱，然后再想办法把我妈妈爸爸送进医院不准浪费钱治疗就可以把我妈妈爸爸杀了，把我妈妈爸爸的退休金给霸占了？据说这些都是当年我爷爷方智仁我奶奶毛爱妹的亲身遭遇。我爸爸当年要不是离开了家不在爷爷奶奶身边，他绝不会允许这种事情发生的；我相信如果不是我奶奶自己让我父亲年幼的弟妹误会了谁才是他们父亲，我父亲的弟妹也不会不管的。
我不是不希望我妈妈有朋友，欧美各国也一直都有付费旅游伙伴或者付费私人伙伴的做法，一切都是规矩，一切都是法律，对所有人的权益都有法律保障。我妈妈嫁给我爸爸就没看过婆婆脸色，更不需要找个祖宗在家里供着给她脸色看，我也不会希望我妈妈成天被气得半死的，我也不会不管。
我身上真是没有长了一条男人阳具，不会没了女人屁股摸摸就活不下去，请不要把我幻想成男人，没有了你们这些女人能得不行的屁股就没法过日子，否则怎么你们就认定你们自己是个女的，就凭着有女人奶子屁股就可以对我幺三和四的，这辈子肯定吃定我了？我身上真是没有长了一条男人阳具，我真的永远不需要你们，永远不需要。
爸爸妈妈：请保护好自己。
----2018年11月9日。
致所有
江苏南京师范大学附属中学高中部1985届毕业生，
江苏南京第四中学初中部1982届毕业生，
上海医科大学1990届毕业生，
美国康州Bridgeport University1999届或2000届毕业生，
以及所有你们的亲朋好友姻亲同学熟人同事：
我方敏是不是2004年在美国继承到我爷爷给我的钱，
南师大附中高中的刘凯车祸真相如何，
我和刘恺的矛盾：
1： 1996年，
2：1996年，对于药检所绯闻事件，
我的广播剧收入是因为广播剧内容是根据我的人生经历制作，
我方敏及我方敏的父母活着不会需要吃你们的一口米，
我方敏的生活里永远不会需要你们的仇恨，
----2018年11月1日。
11-08-2018 与南京方面的矛盾
听说了今天早上的播出，主要是与南京方面的矛盾。
我的不理解：
1）为什么会认定我弟弟会自愿放弃拥有他自己的血脉传承，而只想领养他妻子在婚姻期间与别人所生孩子？他妻子小孩是在2011年-2012年左右出生。
南京方面的不理解：
1）为什么不可以继承我替我父母所购买的退休计划？
我的回答：这退休计划不是人寿保险。我只是一次出资（而非多年累积）让我父母参与了类似401K的30年退休金计划的给付而已。是由我自己出资替我父母购买30年计划的，我还希望替我父母每人再买下一个三十年的退休计划。我也已经要求如有余款需退回当初购买时的付款账户。中国南京方面如此要求实在离谱，实在让我怀疑很多事情。
To my attorneys:
Is it possible to ensure "if there is any leftover in my parents' pension plan, all need to be returned to the original paying accounts." Those from China insist on to inherit any possible leftover has been ridiculous. I wish to buy my both parents a second 30-years plan each.
Min Fang
Nov 8th, 2018
2）每月1万美金为何不可以继续享受？
我的回答：因我离开中国，每月1万美金的美国公司汇款在1996年10月就已经永久停止。南京方面1967年-1996年期间所收到的完全是由丁姓私人助理自己决定给付的，既非美国公司给付，也非方敏给付。
南京方面难以理解，同为方姓，为何没有钱财继承份额? 我只想提醒一句曾经由中国的国家领导人在广播剧上以国家领导人身份对我方敏的某明奇妙公开痛斥：“什么钱，你能有什么钱？谁会给你钱？你父亲没有，你弟弟也没有，你的哪个爷爷为什么不给你父亲什么钱，不给你父亲的兄弟姊妹什么钱，就只给你钱？”
我已经回答了有关我的以及为什么这痛斥根本就是莫名其妙地精神病发作（我在2016年年头就已经开始在波士顿96。9FM上及自己博客上以单篇形式公开解释我的继承是怎么回事，我当时已经是入籍美国公民，虽然不知所继承的是信托但很明确都是美国当地历史悠久公司）。
现在请问你，这些话你能回答吗？你能说这根本是某明奇妙吗？如果你认为你也应该有个信托，就请明白在你的父亲你的爷爷等等统统都不是信托受益人的情况下，你的信托和我的信托不可能相同。你是否有信托以及你的信托你的钱在哪里我完全不知道，我很确定我是我自己信托的唯一受益人，我很确定我的信托我的钱里没有你的一分钱。
----2018年11月8日。
11-07-2018 是欠债应该还钱还是某明奇妙的在绑架敲诈勒索？
就像我昨天提到的我自己愿意的5%帮亲朋的钱，只要是税后合法收入又不做犯罪用途就可以任意使用一样，就算华人不认为我说的这四亿美金生活费用给付是我自己所继承的钱财，只是不知什么人愿意给我钱花，只要这是合法给付又不是中国国库出来的钱，那里轮到中国政府气势汹汹就是不准我方敏花这笔那笔钱？如果不是中国政府努力居然就是公然不准我花用这笔那笔非中国国库的钱财，就算我没有男人，我都已经在2014年底就应该收到4亿美金生活费用足够可以找个如意郎君过自己乐呵日子了，哪有时间会像中国政府所指控的那样需要在2015年开始痛骂中国政府来挣美国政府的救济钱？
你有什么钱？什么钱都不是中国中央及各级地方政府的中国国库钱，中国财政款，
谁会给你钱？谁给都不是中国中央及各级地方政府的中国国库钱，中国财政款。
昨天提到南师大附中毕业的各个好象和我都是仇人，其中，我弟弟婚姻中的妻子所育小孩的亲生父亲本人或其亲戚的那些南师大附中毕业的可能是从2010年女方怀孕就开始了。当时我还在麻州波士顿的洛根飞机场，当时的运动简直是要让德尔塔航空公司罢工才能解决这些员工“坚决拒绝替姐姐做工，只愿替弟弟做工”的呼声，据说当时的解决办法就是只有让他们这些人先辞职，然后等到几十年后现投资人因退休而变更之后再决定是否会向该航空公司求职，当时据说还去了德尔塔公司驻该机场的地区经理办公室，情绪激昂的要求地区经理表态是支持弟弟还是只认姐姐，而这个姐姐当时在该机场的公开身份是无业游民，也就是国人俗称讨饭的，所以听说当时的德尔塔航空公司的地区经理听的是莫名其妙，表态只承认德尔塔航空公司的有效股票证书的合法持有者。
提到我做无业游民那段经历，这可能和麻州波士顿当地一些南师大附中和我同班同届以及其他届毕业生对我的负面公开表态有很大关系。其实整个过程，我就从未讨过一次，最多就是借款（为给我当时开始生病的猫女儿妹妹治病，需要上百上千的美金），也都表态今后会还。都是有这人那人自己坚持一定要给我钱，我还老嫌给的钱太少，不够在中国成买好一点的午餐吃，就是只够买买午餐盒饭广东馄饨面啃啃卤鸡爪之类的，晚餐就只有去这家那家教堂的免费餐了，否则就不够。我是成天叽里咕噜有时还怒气冲天的嫌钱太少，把一群一群的波士顿华人“凭什么，凭什么”的气到半死。其他的无业游民也是类似气到半死。我老是固定睡在一个既安全又有遮挡的好地方，其他无业游民和我抢地方，我就打，他们气的叫警察清场，我就去旁边的波士顿公园转了一圈就又回来睡下了，完全无视警察“不得跨越”的警戒线，还一人独占了整个地方。该地方就在波士顿中国街旁边，就又把波城华人”凭什么”的气到半死。当时的我和现在的我就我老是没钱花的立场态度及表达都是一致的，就是“王八蛋，老是不给我钱花!"。2004年7月1日那天，我做无业游民期间的吃住都已经做好了安排，都知道2004年7月1日谈到过我可能会睡在那里，那块地方就是安排给我睡觉的地方。
谈到高中同班的刘凯可能因为我经常和她出去玩却从不想到一起付帐，就从我购买飞机票的钱里扣了我三千元人民币，那价钱实在是太高了点。我从未吃了她那么多东西，甚至可以说是非常有限，出去吃饭由她或者韩冬掏钱又有我在场的，最多就几次而已还是街边小摊小饭店之类的。她自己当时已经有个一岁到两岁的孩子要养，到哪也都是带着她自己的孩子，既没什么余钱，有钱也都是花在她自己孩子身上，我能花到她多少钱就真是没什么好讲的了。
另一个学校，就是上海医科大学了，因为是名校，所以我大学同学里也有很多是从名校高中毕业的，家里亲朋同学在中国外交部工作的可能也很多，但2004年以后似乎也都是视我为仇敌立场。据说是因为我大学三年级和同班的李健泽去北京游玩的钱未还，认为在从不是恋爱关系的情况下，我的这种做法很离谱。
我当时是这件事情没处理好，应该在把钱还完以后再任性“就是不和他啰嗦，省的别人说我和他谈恋爱”。我对此的气愤就是，我当时不是为了赖账，就只是任性的不合适。我至今就不知当时花了多少钱。主要是火车票，住宿和吃住，都是李健泽付帐，我从来没问过。还有就是一条白色的连衣裙是花了五元钱买的（没打算让他花钱，所以捡的是我自己肯花的价钱买的）。当时是三年级暑假出去玩的，五年制还有两年大学要上，就算我当时四年级秋季开学的时候身上钱不够，都还有3个寒暑假可以回家拿钱还账。我三年级暑假出去玩之前是把当时那个学期所剩下的所有的钱都交给了李健泽，认为家里按常规给的生活费钱400元应该足够，没从家里特别多带钱上学，那个学期紧一点只够还100元左右（50元每月加上一点备用款，400元秋季学期，500元春季学期)。就算当时李健泽对我莫名其妙态度很气愤，坚持在那个学期必须一次还清，我也就是坐趟6个小时的普快火车回南京家里和我父母要钱还账。这些同学当时如果认为我的做法不合适，为什么没有或友善的或愤怒的告诉我应该把帐结了把钱还上。直到毕业，就没人给过我账单，毕业以后就把我说成这样？
听说南师大附中毕业的，上海第一医学院毕业的，都很愤怒我每学期把我父母给我的钱包括备用款都花的尽光，可他们是我父母还是亲生父母哎，这关他们这些同一个学校毕业的什么事？中科院大专院校家属，谁家孩子上大学不是如此计算给付生活费用？哪一家家长指望孩子假期回家居然还上交余款？我开学上学要乘特快，假期回家只买得起普快车票，所有国内国外上大学的，那个不是如此？
就像我昨天提到的我自己愿意的5%帮亲朋的钱，只要是税后合法收入又不做犯罪用途就可以任意使用一样，就算华人不认为我说的这四亿美金生活费用给付是我自己所继承的钱财，只是不知什么人愿意给我钱花，只要这是合法给付又不是中国国库出来的钱，那里轮到中国政府气势汹汹就是不准我方敏花这笔那笔钱？如果不是中国政府努力居然就是公然不准我花用这笔那笔非中国国库的钱财，就算我没有男人，我都已经在2014年底就应该收到4亿美金生活费用足够可以找个如意郎君过自己乐呵日子了，哪有时间会像中国政府所指控的那样需要在2015年开始痛骂中国政府来挣美国政府的救济钱？
你有什么钱？什么钱都不是中国中央及各级地方政府的中国国库钱，中国财政款，
谁会给你钱？谁给都不是中国中央及各级地方政府的中国国库钱，中国财政款。
你们有谁知道，南师大附中85届高中毕业的那个华健，家里是讨饭的还是妓院的？好像都是她的南师大附中朋友坚持认为我父亲方文海应该为他们家的孩子支付抚养费用，估计就是在要我为我父亲母亲购买的退休保险，我父亲放在家里的存款钱已经被我弟弟全部归他自己了，从未向我告知。他们哪来的这逻辑？只要是个男的没下过种没摸过屁股也必须付女人屁股钱？还不给就是不行？他们家从小就那么穷啊，不讨钱就吃不起饭养不起孩子的？读书时都以为她是高干子弟家里经济优越叻。
----2018年11月7日。
11-06-2018 经历如此北极酷寒，点滴心头滋味依然自在做自己
我曾经在这博客上提到，等我收到我自己的四亿美金一年的生活费用给付，我准备放5%在一边，如果我的亲戚朋友之类的有点难处，或者想试试能不能从我这里解决点提高标准的想法，可以自在一点，而不是费尽思量如何开口才是合适。我反正就是这么多钱每个月放在那里，一分钱都不超出，亲朋怎么开口对我而言都是“我看5%还有没有，有就拿去，反正不是给你就是给他或她，没有你就得等下个月了。”一点压力都没有。
可能有人会很奇怪，“你还会有亲朋？都当你脑子有问题才会继续认为自己很有钱，那些男的都和你没关系了。所有你以为能打个电话的，都已经公开私下宣布表态不会和你有任何交往了”。
据说波士顿华人圈子也是认为我现在已经很老实了，也就是没见我满大街找人吵架了，也就没那么气势汹汹耀武扬威的了，但也不再搭理人了。。我自己本人态度是，今后也是这态度立场，我又不是甲亢症患者，没人骚扰的情况下，确实不需要满大街的抗争；再者，我虽在波城待了十几年，也没有什么华人友善朋友，所有也不需要自作多情当别人都很尊重自己需要友善回应以示互相尊重。我今后离开波城，也是会如此以一个过路人而已的态度在各地中国城或华人餐馆商店购物就餐消费等等，会不会去中国得看是否安全能有保障或者是否已被真实宣布拒绝入境了。
至于那5%，我还是会放在一边，因为是缴过投资人税之后的税后收入，支付给任何用途也就是看我自己高兴了。我本人1）不希望被讹诈，2）不愿意资助犯罪用途。除此两点，也就不会需要亲朋就资金可能的用途提供过多解释了。
至于谁是亲朋，这是一个很大很现实的问题。我的父母如果还活着，也是经历过了北极一般冰天雪地的酷寒，点滴在心头，不会在乎是否还需要和善看待华人以示互相尊重。我是唐太宗李世民的真实的血脉传承的继承人，但请永远别把我当成华人的什么亲人什么后盾，我已经永远不是，我只会在乎我自己的私交华人朋友。我是我爷爷们的血脉至亲，他们最在乎的永远是我方敏本人的幸福快乐健康安全。我所有的爷爷们，我父亲及我自己都没有亏欠华人什么而引发如此强烈仇恨。我对八九年学运处理建议从来不是屠杀学生从来不是仇恨学生有当年会议记录作为事实证据就已经足够。
就我所知，父系母系的五等亲以内，全部都是一副“你他妈的算老几”的态度立场，谈不上友善。据说我父亲的弟妹三家人也已经公开表态不再会是亲戚。我本人态度是2004年所愿意赠送的那份礼物，他们如果确实像他们所公开表态的那样拒收，我也不会勉强。我本人没有偷窃他们任何钱财是真实是事实，所以我也不愿意因为只是想感谢他们2004年以前的亲戚立场却让自己变成了似乎是我偷窃了他们的钱财才亏欠了他们的处境。至于其他那些父系的二至五等亲，我确实没见过他们甚至没听说过他们（三等亲以上的那些），所以不太在意他们立场，只在意他们是否在过去这几年的所作所为伤害过我本人或者我的父母以及究竟到了什么程度。
我母亲的兄弟姊妹，据我听说，全部都是痛骂我方敏是从小撒谎从小不说实话还居然敢把（继承的）钱放进我自己的钱包而不是放在桌上让他们随用随取，还都是明知我是从出生起就随我父母生活由我父母提供衣食却一副我欠了他们的抚养费用未还的态度立场。我本人对他们的态度是，我没有欠了居住在江苏南京的王博真夫妻两人任何抚养费用，我更不会欠了我母亲那些居住在其他省市的其他兄弟姐妹的任何抚养费用。我母亲王博贤从十一二岁住进王博真家里开始，就是做王博真夫妻两人的住家女佣挣到她的自己衣食住行，从未被王博真夫妻两人抚养。如此，我也就只会在意我母系五等亲以内是否在过去这几年的所作所为伤害过我本人或者我的父母以及究竟到了什么程度。据说国内十年前已经登报声明过我和母系五等亲以内已无任何亲属关系，我本人不太清楚是谁处理的，我会问问清楚。
我以前在国内国外上学工作的那些同学同事，我也就是只会在意他们是否在过去这几年的所作所为伤害过我本人或者我的父母以及究竟到了什么程度。我高中毕业的南京师范大学附属中学的一些人就和疯子一样，似乎认定了我的钱他们就是可以拿应该拿，还一副“你他妈算老几，这钱那钱拿了用了又怎么了？”的态度，我本人立场也很明确：“你他妈的又算老几，我就是一定扭送你去警察局”。
据说我这一届南师附中五班有个女生华健（“公厕门外一元”有了个南京当地的可能人物），下几届据说有中国国家李姓总理的亲戚男生，方姓七等亲以上男生等等，中国外交部那是一堆，不知这些是否都是南师大附中的毕业学生认定就是够资格抢劫钱财的原因。我现在都已经是全中国都知的中华人民共和国的敌人，可能是因为1）中国共青团中央（北京）是我父亲所工作的中科院及所毕业的南京大学一些他认识的人的小孩，2）江苏共青团是南师大附中毕业的，3）上海共青团是上海小贺的朋友。
上海医科大学2000年并入复旦大学后就有了两校合并的生物医学工程专业（以前一直是合作关系）可能很清楚什么是脑控癌技术及其可用于谋财害命的潜力，以及免费向海内外中国人提供的对我方敏人格所做的“就是下贱就是烂货就是喜欢被虐待”的所谓医学心理分析定论，估计都和每月一万美金故事有关，因为我父亲的两个妹妹当年的婚恋经历听说就是这个待遇，所以我说我可能已经是丁姓私人助理一家想要掠夺财产的方家第三代受害人了，要是没有什么原因，丁姓私人助理哪里会这么自信就因睡了我奶奶几次，就直接把我爷爷奶奶亲生的孙女每月一万美金生活费给扣下了，一点都不担心会有什么事，那一万美金进中国当时可是由中共中央特批的。
我听说的，“就是下贱就是烂货就是喜欢被虐待”的方家第二代的可能受害故事
我本人很实在，是朋友不需多言，不是朋友我也不愿被讹诈。至于质疑我是否有钱，我本人态度就是我有钱没钱都和华人大众无关；至于是否还有旧识可以被称为是亲朋，我本人态度就是随缘了，他们是不是还是亲朋都是我自己的人生我自己过。
至于5%，我可能会用网络表格方式让我的亲朋和我联络，只需大致说明亲朋关系以及所需要金额用途以做轻重缓急的安排，不过只有等我收到四亿每金一年的生活费用给付我才可以放5%在一边，否则我自己都不够用。我会公布联络方式。
----2018年11月6日。
11-05-2018 中国外交部的“就是不同意”
听说了今天早上播出内容，英国东印度公司的法国投资公司出面说明我方敏自称是英国东印度公司的法国投资人是他们所容让的真实，听说了中国政府外交部的一贯立场“就是不同意”，也听说了美国方面的咨询“是否谁都可以这么自称”，所得到该法国公司的回答是“只有（你们问到的）这同一个人方敏可以这么自称。”
10-11-2018 为什么是我一个人的钱 && Why Trust-inheriting
据说中国外交部在广播剧上最经常的表态就是“就是不同意”。
我说我有合法继承钱财，中国外交部表态就是不同意；
我说我是这些信托的唯一受益人，中国外交部表态就是不同意；
我说我现在已经是美国公民，我是按照美国中国英国的信托及继承相关法律这么说的，中国外交部表态就是不同意说有钱，就是不同意说是唯一受益人。
我除了连蹦带跳，连嘶带吼，直着嗓子说“他们不同意？！他们不同意？！”，其他能做的也就是只有报警处理。
为什么？
因为我是不是在美国继承到合法财产，以及我是不是唯一继承了财产的人，都不是什么中国外交部中国政府同意或者不同意的事情，这些全部都是财产的法律所有权所决定的事情，也就是说这是美国的法律事务，牵涉的我的一些中国公民亲戚的，也就是中国的涉外法律事务，而非什么中国外交事务或者中国的内政事务。中国政府的这种表态，势必在海外华人社区对我方敏造成负面影响是我报警的原因。
中国国内的以及外交部就是不理解为什么的一些人，来看看下一个例子，你们是不是能明白一些。
******
我说中国外交部驻欧美各国的领馆工作人员的婚姻配偶，如在所驻国家生活，一般都有当地的合法居住身份。
这是不是个可以由那些也想在国外生活的中国人民所不同意的说法？
假如，他们就是要在国内报纸上公开表态，说这是贪污腐败，他们就是难以明白为什么在中国人民已经坚决不同意的情况下，中国外交部的这些驻外人员的婚姻配偶居然坚持就是如此居然还实际拥有海外合法居住身份。听到如此公开的代表着中国人民的愤怒表达，国内中国人民，国内驻外人员，各自会是如何反应？（海外华人很清楚）
假如，还有更讲道理的表态说，“我不是在要求你们帮助解决我作为中国公民海外生活的身份问题，我是在问你们，我自己的，我自己的，我自己的海外合法居住身份，这是我自己的身份，我自己的东西，你们凭什么就是不给？” 听到如此公开的代表着中国人民的愤怒表达，国内中国人民，国内驻外人员，各自会是如何反应？（海外华人很清楚）
再听听以下说法是不是类似：
中国政府外交部对我坚持自己有钱的表态基本上是，全中国人民都已经不同意方敏有钱了，美国政府美国的广播公司也非常配合，保证不让任何人听见方敏说她自己有钱，方敏居然自己弄了个博客天天在网上写她自己有钱，美国政府居然还说要捍卫法治国家保证她有钱。所以你们都听到了在美国的华裔所做的高调宣布，宁可他们自己犯法也要用科技手段不准我方敏收到钱，就算那是美国政府美国社会安全局寄出的钱或支票都不准。（广播剧上所宣布的都是公开的代表着中国政府的愤怒表达）
对我方敏有钱这件事情的很讲道理的表态：我不是在问你要你的钱，我是在问你我自己的钱在哪里，我自己的，我自己的，我自己的钱，不是你的钱，你不可以就是不给。我的回答一般是：你从没告诉过我你把钱藏哪儿了，我根本就从不认识你，我就只能想象你自己的钱一定藏在你自己的肛门里，你自己才会给忘了藏哪儿了。（广播剧上所宣布的都是公开的代表着中国政府的愤怒表达）
******
你们再听听，如果中国外交部坚持就是一定如此公开表态说，就是不同意我说自己应该是有小孩，就是不同意我说自己可能有婚姻（因为孩子不会是非婚生），居然还坚决就是不同意，（这态度也就是除非亲手摸到，操到我孩子父亲才会同意了）。否则还能怎么理解。
还有，就是关于我是唯一受益人的说法，
方智仁1965年在上海去世时，有给他的二女一子每人一个银行存折及一封遗嘱。
听说了中国司法部已经查了，目前没有查到1965年去世的方智仁是否在海内外另外留给了他自己的四名子女任何信托或者任何钱财，也已经查实了我方敏是方智仁1948年所设立信托的唯一受益人。
我的曾祖父就是方智仁的父亲，早在1930年就去世了，他的子女也就是我爷爷兄妹三人，是在他们三兄妹共同的亲生母亲照看下分到他的家产。
方家一些后人就是不信他们自己没钱，就是不同意我是这些信托唯一受益人，才闹成现在这个样子。我就一直强调财产的所有权是由法律所决定的，我是唯一受益人是由每一个爷爷的这每一份遗嘱所决定的。
实事求是问一句：他们认为是哪个爷爷有可能会在他们都还没出生，而且都不知会不会有他们这些小孩生在方家的时候，就留给他们一笔钱？有什么特殊原因让他们坚定认为至少一百多年前就已经去世的那些爷爷一定给了他们一笔钱？
我2004年继承时，从未怀疑为何只有我一个人继承，就是因为当时我父母健在，而我爷爷奶奶也早已去世，我自己又从不知自己家里还有钱在海外，所以不管是什么钱，都一定是特意给我的。我从小也很习惯我在方家很特别，但我也很清楚不是我父亲母亲或者我父亲弟妹这么认为。我i父亲母亲对我的宠爱是父母宠女，不是代表方家宠我。
----2018年11月5日。
11-04-2018 The reasons why I am in such a financial poverty situation
Attorneys: Where my Trusts are registered is very important to say I have inherited money.
Not when my Trust paying out as decided and on time. It is purely private legal matter when I can receive my providing as expected. Plus. I already contacted law enforcement when I thought I inherited some companies in 2004 but Os insisted on to claim theirs. I can't receive all these paid-out is the reason for my current financial situation.
----November 4th, 2018
Law enforcement personnel who are not on the case: Your Trusts have been registered owned by the U.S. Convoy since 1965 is the reason that those paid-outs should not be your money.
It is rumored all my Trusts have been registered to be owned by the "U.S. Convoy" which is the United States since 1965, which means all these paid-out since 2004 can't be my money. I heard it is explained already that "U.S. Convoy" is the U.S. Treasury Department and these Trust-Registry are also in the same U.S. Treasury Department. Well, if the Trust-Registry is explained has been in the U.S Treasury Department since 1965, it is obviously explaining that is not valid Trust-Registry. Trust-Registry should be Justice Department's registration record.
Also, Trust-Registry is unduplicatable which is similar to the commercial company's ownership registry, this means it is impossible to have two registries regarding one Trust, if the registry information has the same name, same settler, same year but different beneficiary person registry for a Trust, there must have some confusion about if two registry is about the same Trust.
----November 4th, 2018
Some husbands: "If you want to be my friend, you have to let my wife be spoiled as she prefers" which means taking over my money.
Well, I was never asked me if I wish to be such a friend, I gave my answer here:
I refuse to be such a friend to any husband.
Exactly, why I need to be a friend to such husbands? Some said it is for the convenience to have a sexual relationship when he is already having the preferred romance choice he calls his wife, but I have very hard time to understand how the Senior-aged husband could possibly be assumed my preferred sex choice when there is obviously no compensation for the husband's senior age but only big financial loss to me because of his willingness to spoil his wife? Exactly, why would I need a senior sex partner to worry if he would get a heart attack in every single second during his only quickie-capable participation? *rumored it is loudly announced on the radio "not even quickie-capable".
Let's excluding this sex partner illusion to evaluate the necessity to be such a friend to such husbands, why I need to be such a friend to such a husband who is determined to spoil his wife's determination to take over my money as the friendship condition? The answer is I have no reason at all.
So, I say loudly that I refuse to be such a friend to any such husbands.
----November 4th, 2018
11-03-2018 日本侵华，八国联军入侵，以及我还是不是个华人
日本侵华：
我对二战期间日本军队卓越表现的欣赏，而我本人又是南京人，据说在国内引发我对中日战争态度如此，是否被人花钱指使？我的回答：某明奇妙，无稽指责。
我来试试这么解释是否容易被大众所理解：二战期间的中国周边地区形势。
因为我继承的是信托，在国内外引发了遗嘱继承，分家产继承和信托继承之间究竟有何区别的广泛关注；现在又听说据说按照欧美国家的法律，就算是抢夺得到的财产，只要这些财产没有任何人可以继承，这些财产也是可以在主人被杀后就可以合法拥有。这更是引发广泛好奇。*其实按照欧美法律，抢劫财产，谋财害命都是刑事罪名。但确实有无主的房屋是可以被住户（就算是破门而入的住户）所合法拥有的法律。我本人不是太清楚法律条款区别。
二战期间的中国周边地区形势。
中日战争是1937年开始，再加国共两党之间的国内战争，可想而知，中国当时的富豪是如何希望安全转移自己的金银珠宝。他们当时如果是将这些金银珠宝转出国外托人照顾就是在办理财产的国际信托了。现在来看看当时的中国富豪可以考虑将财产转移去哪个国家：
北部：
俄罗斯：《列宁在1918》这部电影就是在说苏联是在1918年已经实现共产主义，财产转移过去恐怕就是被共产了，而且当时苏联是在和德国开战。
日本，韩国等亚洲北部国家，不是已经和日本苦战，就是快要开战；
东南部
菲律宾，马来西亚等东南亚地区，也是要么已经和日本苦战，要么就是快要开战；
西部：
印度巴基斯坦（当时是一个国家），英属殖民地，基本上不受日本的战争威胁。
还有，
香港，澳门也是英属殖民地，基本上不受日本的战争威胁。
台湾当时已经是日本殖民地。
现在大众可能可以明白为什么前几天是由英国司法当局出面解释二战期间及国共内战期间（1941-1949）的一些中国富豪在海外所设立信托的如今下落的一些疑问。
再进一步，日本是一个国力有限，人力有限的岛国，却可以让整个亚洲众多国家如此苦战多年，直到1945年美国在广岛投放原子弹才由日本天皇宣布战败。我在2004年认为日本军队在二战期间的军事卓越表现不可否认，是完全出于军事策略理论探寻的观点，完全不牵涉是否在否认日本对华发动的是侵略战争。
我本人是对二战期间日本军队有着卓越军事策略表现的观点的第一人是我的终身骄傲，但这完全不牵涉是否在否认日本在亚洲各国所发动的是侵略战争。
有关八国联军入侵中国：
目前已知的，爷爷们替我所设立的信托有在葡萄牙，西班牙，英国，法国等等投资，这些国家当年入侵中国，我所继承信托的投资在当时是怎么回事？我的信托所投资的这些公司没有参与。
我在中国上中学时从历史课上所知道的，八国联军入侵中国是为了强力推动鸦片类特殊生意。
我所听说的，我的信托所投资的公司，都是类似英国的东印度公司，做各种贸易但不是特殊贸易（鸦片贸易归属特殊贸易）。英国的东印度公司当时在印度做香料茶叶纺织布料生意，非常红火，当时有意开拓中国市场作类似生意，中国丝绸，中国香料（花椒，丁香类），中国茶叶等等，但没有参与鸦片类特殊贸易。葡萄牙的也是已经经营各种贸易多年也很成功，也没有参与鸦片类特殊贸易。
当时的英国东印度公司，虽然拥有公司自己的武装力量，但我在网上查过，英国印度两国都认可当时的英国东印度公司武装力量是由英国的国会（Parliament）所领导而非东印度公司自己是事实。葡萄牙的公司也是类似。
至于我的信托所投资的这些公司所缴纳税款被这些国家用于战争用途，这不是我的信托所投资的公司可以参与决定的。就像中国各级公司所缴纳的利税，都是由中国中央政府决定所需军费额度及军费如何开支，所有按照税法缴税的公司都没有可能参与这些决策。
以及我还是不是个华人：
听说很多国内国外的华人都感觉我已经不再认为自己是个华人，所以在我的博客上如此痛骂中国。
我本人只会感激一千多年来所有帮我尽心照顾我爷爷给我的这些信托的所有人，我本人只会用美好的语言来形容自己的利益被法律所保护着的感受。这不是因为我是个华人选择了在美国生活，而是因为我是所有这些的受益人。
我在2004年继承信托时，从未鄙视中国或者华人，我是2008北京奥运会开闭幕式创意人是事实，广播局所报道的我对中国大城市的地铁建设，中国的沙漠治理，苏州的建设发展，以及台湾面板行业的发展等等所作贡献统统都是事实。
我本人自2004年开始就一直在麻州波士顿公开痛骂海外华裔社区，
所谓“为所有女人的幸福而奋斗“就是以此为号召让所有女人和我方敏个人作对让我方敏个人悲惨，根本就是在忽略我也是个女人是事实；
所谓”为所有华人的利益而奋斗“就是在以此为号召让华裔社区对我方敏个人进行踩跺骂砸让我方敏死绝拉到，根本就是在恶意忽略我方敏也是个百分百华人是事实。
我方敏在2018年上半年就已经发表公开声明强调自己活着不需要吃中国华人民共和国的一口米，死了也不会需要中国人民共和国支付丧葬费用，就是因为自2015年中国人民共和国是以中国外交部，中共中央政治局的名义资源对我方敏进行公开谩骂造谣抹黑，甚至以中国人民解放军为武力威胁实施敲诈勒索谋财害命。
我方敏是美国公民，百分百华人血脉，但永远拒绝被任意践踏来作为自己被认可是华人的条件。我是不是华人不需要被你们认可，我的父母已经生我为华人，生我为唐太宗李世民的继承人。我已经公开声明我不需要你们中华人民共和国，我不需要你们海外华裔社区，这已经包括我不需要你们的认可。
我不需要你们来相信我说的话，因为我从来都认为是你们自己赞同我的观点才会是你们愿意聆听的原因；
我不需要你们相信我有钱，你们信不信都是我花我自己的钱过我自己的日子。
那些华人参与过脑控癌治疗的，他们都是已经经历过，相信不相信愿意不愿意，都是在看着我每天花钱。
等我收到我自己的生活费，也是如此，你们愿意不愿意相信不相信，都是我过我自己的快乐舒适生活；
等我遇到我自己的美好如意郎君，也是如此，你们愿意不愿意相信不相信，都是我和我的年轻英俊美好如意过我自己的快乐甜蜜恋爱生活；
我不需要你们相信我有钱。我有钱没钱以及有多少钱，都是法律所有权，从来不需要你们认可我才可以说我自己有钱。
----2018年11月3日。
11-02-2018 中国政府组织的广播剧”宣布“演出的得益者及受害人
听说了今天早上的播出，总算是听到了“习近平在血缘上不是毛泽东的小孩”这种事实的说法而不再只是“已经宣布两个人很像亲生父子啦”。
2015年开始由中国文化部，中国外交部，中国宣传部所组织的广播剧演出就是因为如此这种”就是要宣布“然后就是"已经向公众宣布了也坚决不会纠正所宣布的说法，就算不是事实，（你们）就是一点办法都没有"而产生的矛盾。
有实际好处的“宣布”演出：
六个男的真名实姓宣布一生深爱同一个外语学校的老师小程（音，或是陈），且都有难忘的美好性生活，这个小程老师在国内学过工商管理，所以，这个外语学校的小程老师就成了中国政府李克强总理对内对外推荐不回避是其骄傲妻子，中国国家主席习近平人前挺胸的其三十多岁唯一儿子的亲妈，就是如此有着”被宣布的杰出经济才华的中国经济的重要领导人才”。
如此“宣布”演出的受害者:
六个中国国内的无名男子以诚实语调宣布实在是不知道当时在美国已经快二十年的方敏能有什么才华会有什么成就贡献，再加上中国总理李克强的强力愤怒宣布“方敏就没有可能会有什么才华，就是不可能相信方敏会有才华”， 从此事实上的北京2008奥运会开幕式闭幕式创意人方敏，就被中国文艺界普遍认为是假冒伪造。方敏在美国的科技及其他成就所挣的智慧产权收入也因此在中国政府的强硬支持下，在美国华裔广泛参与支持下被大规模必须提领（2016年后有至少80亿美金如此“她是假冒伪造，中国政府已经宣布了“就必须被提领，其中包括八大部电影参与创作费及其他）。
就此，我方敏对真名实姓参与如此“宣布”演出以赢得真实利益并在意识上已经实质践踏了中国自己的相关法律的中国国家主席习近平中国国家总理李克强的痛骂就是如此在我的博客上真实被记录了。
------2018年11月2日。
关于康州硚口大学毕业的上海人马一茜（Tracy Ma, Tiffany Ma），华人社区有很多说法。
我的回应：2004年7月以前，我经常去她家里做客不是因为恨她。而是当她是个可以一起聊聊天的，但绝不愿意让她到我家里翻箱底的这么一个人。我当时从未听说过串婚，也打心眼里不赞同她的婚姻观，她的方姓丈夫虽也是籍贯宁波镇海的上海人，但我当时从未听说有此亲戚(现在听说也确实没有血缘关系)，她丈夫也是马一茜向我介绍是她丈夫的，所以我是在2004年6月份在新洲一对夫妻都不是上海人的大学同学家里提到马一茜小孩一事，但从未向她丈夫举报，因为不是她丈夫朋友也确实不知该如何处理才合适。
2004年7月1日据说有提到马一茜，因为当时的美国移民法改革，她的方姓丈夫虽是美国公民但不能帮她解决美国居留身份问题，我当时挺乐意帮帮她解决她的身份（现在听说她的身份是别人帮忙解决的），但不乐意给她丈夫一笔钱。据说有些华人对此很愤怒，我就很奇怪，我当时是马一茜的朋友，我就只愿意帮她解决一下她的美国居留身份却会愿意给她丈夫一大笔钱，为什么呀？想让她丈夫把她当垃圾给扔出去啊？我当时并不恨马一茜，我为什么会这么处理？
很多人说，如果马一茜在2004年7月以前对我还是很友善，我为什么在2004年6月把她说成那样？因为确实就她的婚姻观对她有看法。我是听马一茜自己说她丈夫对她有多好，我是听马一茜自己说她是自己如何坚决愿意和以前的男朋友分手，就为和她的丈夫可以正正经经结婚生孩子的，我是听马一茜自己说她的丈夫如何愿意做两份餐馆工让她可以不用出去做工的 , 我从未像很多女人对马一茜不用出去做工很反感，就是因为我是亲眼看见是她丈夫自己的态度是他自己很愿意他自己多苦点可以让他自己的老婆小孩舒服点，然后我是自己发现原来她的小孩不是她丈夫亲生的。
就是因为我确实因为她的婚姻观对她本人有很多负面看法，平时很多不会说的与我无关的小细节，那天的负面态度也都体现了。但我当时很清楚，就算我对她有很多负面看法，她的婚姻问题还是不应该由我介入，2004年7月1日那天我当时还是乐意帮她解决身份问题让她不用依赖婚姻。
2004年7月底我搬到麻州波士顿后，马一茜对我当时在摩根大通银行工作的恶意仇恨宣泄似的干扰是我从那时起就不再和马一茜交往的原因，马一茜在我2007年1月离开摩根大通银行之后持续不懈的仇恨表达是我永远认为马一茜很恶劣的原因。
所谓的上海心理学界对此的一些解释，可能是基于他们都是上海人很清楚丁姓私人助理1967-1996年的家庭财务如何优越，而非对于已经远在美国多年的我方敏有多少了解。
------2018年11月2日。
11-01-2018 Why Chinese community is so daring? 以及致所有和我同届毕业的一封信
Why the Chinese community is so daring? Is it only the Chinese community in the United States so daring to use computer technology to prevent any money transfer to me even if it is from the United States Social Security Administration? I heard this determination is what announced in this morning's broadcasting.
I graduated from a prestigious high school in Jiangsu province which, of course, a lot of shining prominent stars should be expected, I just don't know why it is everyone's efforts from that school to kill me because I dare to say I have inherited rich money which should not be allowed, and if I can't be stopped me to keep saying so, I have to be killed in order to prevent me saying I have inherited rich money lawfully. Why is this?
I heard all these frustrations expressed by those same year classmates, or same year graduated are all about I can't claim other people's money, but have they heard the explanations given so loudly that money ownership by law is the reason I have rich money lawfully?
致所有
江苏南京师范大学附属中学高中部1985届毕业生，
江苏南京第四中学初中部1982届毕业生，
上海医科大学1990届毕业生，
美国康州Bridgeport University1999届或2000届毕业生，
以及所有你们的亲朋好友姻亲同学熟人同事：
我方敏是不是2004年在美国继承到我爷爷给我的钱，以及我是不是确实很有钱，从来不是因为你们30年前和我曾经共坐一间教室就可以成为事实真相的权威人士的。请相信，在美国，财产的法律所有权是由美国司法部所捍卫的，我宣称自己很有钱且不愿在中餐馆挣生活费用，一直住政府楼食粮食卷，用教育部的学生贷款念MBA，还一直在等美国政府相关机关寄钱给我使用，都是我在此博客从未回避的话题，是否这些行为牵涉到违反美国法律甚至涉及犯罪都是应该由美国司法部侦办处理的，实在是不需要你们中的一些人自己志愿自己乐意就利用流言蜚语公共传媒来私设公堂捍卫你们自己的错觉。你们从来无权擅自侦办，从来无权审理，更从来无权非法做任何权威裁定。请你们这些人自重。
南师大附中高中的刘凯车祸真相如何，不是远在美国的我有可能知道的，我也从未参与任何有嫌疑制造车祸的行为。广播剧制作组制作播出与刘凯相关的内容，但不可能是她车祸的制造者。请将你们的任何疑问向中国公安部，江苏省公安厅以及南京市公安局提出。
我和刘恺的矛盾：
1： 1996年，我通过傅萍所购的来美国的飞机票往返票价是1万元人民币（在美国所退的回程票价是200美金）, 据说是刘凯建议，已经不是朋友（如果是我误解，请纠正）。刘凯1996年所借出的3000元人民币，我通过我父亲在1997年还了4500元人民币。
2：1996年，对于药检所绯闻事件，刘凯所持观点及强硬立场做法，已经不是朋友。
我的广播剧收入是因为广播剧内容是根据我的人生经历制作，提成所得比例计算等等全部依据美国相关法律，不应被视为刘凯车祸的赔偿基金。我已经听说你们认为广播剧有播出和你们相关内容，你们就应按广播剧利润比例提成的观点，我也听说了广播公司已经向你们解释过你们的观点不符合美国的相关法律，如有任何疑问，请向你们自己的律师咨询。
我方敏及我方敏的父母活着不会需要吃你们的一口米，死了也不会需要你们支付丧葬费用。
我方敏的生活里永远不会需要你们的仇恨，我方敏的生活里永远不会需要你们。
----2018年11月1日。
10-31-2018 A dissolved Trust is an unclaimed property or an equivalent to a no owner house
I heard this morning's broadcasting is impressively saying I am a resident of a hostility State, which is after the hostility expressed by the city officials I am a resident of several months ago, all because both believed I have no money of my own but insisted on continuing living on taxpayers' money, and no matter how popular the reality radio program based on my life stories had been, somehow both agreed there should not be my share at all in the money it generated which I called it major featured person fee. This was the story I was told about this morning's broadcasting. And I know for certain Boston's Chinese community has this understanding about who I am. It is rumored this morning's Boston Chinese group are the same year graduates from the same high school (南师大附中) that I graduated from in 1985, not the first similar group broadcasted this similar opinion on this same radio program, nor the only school I graduated from.
Regarding if the major featured person fee should also pay to all these people that had been in stories that associated me with classmates, etc, I know for sure it is all according to the United States laws that regulate reality show's producing, broadcasting and related. I heard the radio company has already communicated all these law-related to all those who are interested to know how much they should get paid because of this radio program's success. Please direct all these confusions and anger to the producing company for explanations.
Regarding the shared true honest understanding among them that I am a useless person to be associated with and it was years ago, I respond with true honesty as well "the same is the vise visa".
The hostility:
Well, I said about killing to de-own a Trust is some group of people's fantasy to get money that I am not willing to give. How exactly is this possible? Is this me exaggerating my situation? Well, if one knows once the beneficiary or beneficiaries are no longer alive would cause a Trust to be de-owned(dissolved) as an unclaimed property or No-owner property, one won't deny what won't be a difference to eliminate a sole beneficiary or the entire beneficiary group when the public killing is propaganda on the public media as "nothing wrong but death executed".
The background:
In the United States and a lot of Europe countries, a no-owner real estate property can be owned by an occupant even that is the result from a break-in, an unclaimed property can be auctioned to be distributable fund negotiable among government agencies. A company owned by a Trust is an organization equivalent to a property which can generate yearly distributable fund.
The pieces of possible evidence:
Now, do you think I am exaggerating if hearing all these people who don't allow me to spend my own living expenses providing are also the people who tie themselves to be so closely associated to the investments of my Trusts that I claimed? Isn't my intellectual incomes have impressively been understood as "can be owned by refusal to return or the refusal of the continuing payment to be stopped"?
Also, the way how private Assistant Ding's children had tied themselves through broadcasting to F's and R's as the seems-eligible-for-ownership-confusion group. I have accused private assistant Ding may be responsible to my grandparents (both) death when they were both not allowed to spend their own money by private assistant Ding's relatives when they were hospitalized in 1958 and 1965? Those relatives are the producers of this radio program for some time already.
The rumored logic:
The rumored propaganda has been some money-wanter group may throw someone a penny if this someone can help them to get billions. The logic of all this is "who cares about your money after you become a dead body no matter how you express your unwillingness?" which I responded with who cares why you want the money but why it has to be you who own that money and this will be till your death day.
The assumed plan:
So, I assume their plan is "Just do this or that no matter how ridiculous or illegal anyone may complain about, no one can do anything about it because everyone is already well-positioned to ensure so". Well, I say I already complained to the professional law enforcing people even though I don't know if well-positioned also covers them as well. At least, I am still very comfortable to speak up what pisses me off and I am still very comfortable to be quiet.
The further possible reason:
I chose to live in Boston during my anxiety treatment, it is rumored that Massachusetts' anger has been why I did those upgrading in JPM Chase's tech center in Massachusetts which has caused a lot of troubles to Massachusetts. I don't know about any troubles I had caused to Massachusetts by upgrading computer technology for a company, but I understand the confusion is from that fact I did not do anything related to improve banking industry's computer security but all these nobody-needed changes and related confusion that these upgrading made malicious efforts can be customer-ordered.
My answer to this type of confusion is: Banking industry has tons of talented people experienced enough on facilities security that if all these specialty knowledge can be helped by those computer technology upgrading to be applicable on virtue banking facility (internet banking) as well, I am and I was too green to do more on securing the banking industry's information system facility.
My answer to the related confusion is: the same also applies to anti-malicious efforts.
----October 31st, 2018
10-30-2018 Some "not realistic" concerns from the Chinese community and more about JPM Chase Change
This morning's broadcasting which is rumored still broadcasting in some radio channel somewhere if not NYC, it is announced that I am expected to be handsomely shopping-capable without cash or a credit card.
I heard it is broadcasted as, for in-store shopping, a cashier can discount me with the manager's instruction or with the store's security tape of me purchasing the item together with the receipt. I personally totally don't object this privilege if the store employee is willing to offer this privilege to me, but I promise I won't complain as well if the employee feels more comfortable to consult the store manager before relying on the store's security tape as well.
Also, I heard it is announced if anyone willing to offer me real estate treat, the General Attorney's office needed to be contacted because I won't be the person paying the rents, which would be obviously true enough before I finally receive my handsome yearly providing. And I won't hesitate to move-in once I receive the moving authorization letter from BHA or the General Attorney's office because it should be based on appropriate arrangement made to cover rents appropriately, but I won't move in with my chunks from my current residence because my current apartment should have already paid in full was the 2004's deal I remembered, and for over 50 years is what I heard of.
If I can get above privileges, I will be the happy one. "Not realistic" won't be my concern.
Ok, now is the confusion expressed about the blog article regarding JPM Chase change I wrote. Well, a technology person who participated that change in Lowell, MA has commented in this morning's broadcasting that he only recognizes the spreadsheet table is authentic true account for what happened, but not everything else. Those are too stretchy and don't make any sense.
Well, I started laughing when I heard this comment, obviously, I have not graduated from the MBA education yet. ( 09-07-2018 The Sweeping Change of Technology Upgrading in JPM Chase )
The link is the article this technology person complained about which was my effort to recall what happened in JPM Chase as an MBA student with a technology background, "doesn't make sense" stated the obvious that my blog article failed to communicate something clearly between "what to change"(the spreadsheet table) and "how to change" which was the change process that I did not participate as a manager but as a part of the human resource efforts. Some said it may be because I was not an employee who never participated in any town hall meetings organized by the tech management that were related to this changing process.
This blog article started off as my homework for course MBA503 Organizational Change, which emphasizes this change's impacts on the organization instead of the computer technology academically. In MBA, an organization's change always has "what need to change" and the change process of "how to change". In this article, I was recalling the JPM Chase's technology upgrading I participated from viewing it as a successful organizational change, not just some technology events.
I heard misunderstanding about this organizational change experience was mostly about how this change can increase business opportunities relates to enhancing computer security that I was invited to take a look at on July 1st of 2004. The answer is: Any security enhancement is a customer-order on security which needs to be fulfilled exactly as requested to achieve the objective of the highest level of security that technology can offer. If improving quality control on developing web applications or software is the necessity to enhance security on the network & information system, why not increase some business opportunities by offering customer-order web application(software) to improve business clients' experiences as well?
----October 30th, 2018
10-29-2018 Trust Entity, Trust Inheriting and No-Owner Trust
Li's Family Trust company in Hong Kong, a lot of times, I am asked if this is the company created by the Trust my grandfather set up for me in 1948? I heard it is confirmed as "there are at least 6 such companies created by a Li's Trust that set up in the 1940s are now operating their business in the Hong Kong area, which company?"
I heard, in this morning's broadcasting, both my great-grandmother and my grandfather had named each's Trust set up for me as Li's (Family) Trust （李氏（李家）信托）. So, I am associated with two of such companies, I heard my grandfather's is the biggest one, both as the sole beneficiary person. I heard my great-grandmother had conditioned my inheriting to provide my father a living as he desires which proved to be my full-heart pleasure before I heard of this Trust, which was the reason I quietly inherited it (1941 with 60,000 Dayang) without the reading. (I also heard the real truth is no such condition at all from my great-grandmother.)
Well, with all these sole-beneficiary Trust-inheriting, what will happen if a situation does happen but no next-kin inheriting as well according to my own will? I expressed my own willingness as "No-owner is not an option either" in a will-letter to the U.S laws. What this means? It means I am free from the horrifying rumor of "government agency(agencies) can conduct murder to de-own a Trust in order to get some money". It means it is according to my will that no any government nor any organization can own any money from any of my Trusts as no-owner wealth if a situation happens.
So, how will I provide for my father who is a book-nuts to my great-grandmother, to satisfy my great-grandmother's wish to let him live happily in his desired way? Good health insurance, comfortable living as I have already provided since 2004. I was complained about not emphasizing it is my father side grandfathers' blessing that I am providing for my parents, and I am willing to stress that but not knowing how yet. My father is not the person can handle financial stress which I heard is the opinion I share with my great-grandmother. So, my thoughts are to lower my mother's dress-providing level to the degree that is a match for their 10 years age difference in their appearances. (My father already earned his allowance difference with my mother which is much higher as a retired Science Academy scientist versus a retired level 1 accountant).
Also, about sayings how I disrespect my grandmother. It is nonsense to say so. She was my grandmother no matter what marriage issue my grandfather complained. I heard my grandfather died with a broken heart by such news at his deathbed that three out of her four children are not even my grandfather's blood, which already says what situation I have to deal. I do what is necessary to clarify that, my Trust inheriting, and my relative-gifting to my father's siblings, both have nothing to do with such rumors. And I state here that I heard private assistant Ding was the only affair my grandmother had which was 8-9 years after she already had been sharing four children with my grandfather. It was my grandmother who confused my father's young age siblings about their blood. I never disrespected my grandmother.
----October 29th, 2018
10-28-2018 Promoting the New Era in Software Developing is the reason I have been abused?
I heard my yesterday's blog article has triggered a lot of discussions if my personal experiences are saying that the United States government sector also has this if Constitutional doubts, well, I heard a lot of very impressive co-operative efforts to abuse me are from those who heard of the big secret that I am announced a State Enemy to the United States since 2007 on the radio program "undercover-ly" which means the audience doesn't know it was me that being announced a State Enemy if not an insider. This entire time, these people have been wondering how long it takes to eventually evict me from the United States or if my complaints are the results of being executed penalties accordingly. I heard the reason I am announced a State Enemy was because of the computer technology upgrading I promoted in JPM Chase between August of 2004- January of 2007. I have a post stating it is ridiculous that this organizational change of computer technology upgrading that happened in JPM Chase was somehow misunderstood as some sort of very destructive political movement, I repost its MBA Force Field analysis table below which listed reasons to change in the column of "Forces drive the change" and what changes I promoted in the column of "To reduce forces resist the changes". The score column represents the change item's priority level in my understanding.
The objective of the JPM Chase's change between 2004-2007 was
To change software developing from the status quo of
"expecting the Business take-in whatever is developed by the technology"
to the new era of
"requesting the technology to develop software exactly as the Business requested or as the Business' customer-order."
About another impressive group, the R names, well, possible related rumors are:
1: The rumor "the mother married to the father at the same time when the daughter married to the son" is possibly the description of how influential the mother is to the father. The mother is one of the "Pejoves" who have been confused about the "Pejoves" Fund company's lawful ownership, plus if the father's $500,000 daily spending is to spend on me or to donate to the special donation program.
I say to the mother please direct your confusion to the "Pejoves" company and the father. It is very annoying to hear so many "hold it" to the money that I lawfully own and am in need to use.
2: The same equal Chinese Yu families have been all around them.
It is rumored that the Chinese Yu families are biologically related to my grandfather's former private assistant Mr. Ding's birth father. I have to say this private assistant Ding is possibly my family's bad luck or even a curse ever since he was hired.
The Chinese Yu clan is
3: The insider rumor of "Whose lover this Chinese woman Min Fang has been" among R's names.
This entire time, I kept on saying I only met one person having the R's name, and the entire world felt with me that I have been chased after by the entire group of R names while I am financially handsomely independent has been at least in my own understanding, what could possibly be the problem?
The problem was rumored because I visited MoMA (a museum) in the big New York City in January and February of 2015, and my visits were seen by some Chinese which sparked the rumor if I had been a lover to its biggest donator, a late Mr. R. But I never heard of the late Mr. R at all which is a certain information to a lot of R names, and the late Mr. R himself certainly never suspected anything such sort of, but his late wife's children have been all very angry about it.
So, I clarify some references: The late Mr. R was the person invested in those movies and Broadway shows that I participated in the discussion on July 1st of 2004. The truth of what happened on that day was he was conducting his own investing business which I had complained as "totally impacted my investment share in those opportunities" since I heard of his name in this year of 2018. And that was all.
----October 28th, 2018
10-27-2018 Min Fang's response (方敏的回应）
1: Unbearable truly means no such need & no such reason at all for me to swallow it all to tolerate all these " To destroy you is the only presentation of such association because that is how you got this association" expression. （难以承受确实就是在说没有任何需要也没有任何理由，让我忍辱带愤的容让所有这些“摧毁你的一切就是唯一和你交往的方式，你不就是这么被时刻摧毁着才可以够资格打打电话之类的可以有点关系吗？”以及类似的表白。)
2: Infront of laws of any lawful country that has a valid Constitution, a citizen with a government office almighty should still be a part of the people not above the people nor led by the people. （在任何一个有着有效的宪法的法治国家，政府高官作为一个公民，在法律面前都应只是人民的一部分，“王子犯法与庶民同罪”，而不是高于人民或被人民领导着。）
听的懂中英文的都知道这一句 “She confused herself with the people(“她把自己等同于了人民"） 也就是”你他妈算老几，也就是人民一份子而已。(truly means "Who the fuch do you think you are, you are just one of the people")。
----October 27th, 2018
10-26-2018 Confusions and Anger from China (来自中国的困扰和愤怒）
1: Exactly, what money is Min Fang's own money that should be given to Min Fang by the U.S. government? （中文附后）
My explanation: This money is transferred from Min Fang's Trust's investment in the United States to the U.S. Treasury Department's financial service office to be transferred into my personal private account, with the financial service charge as well, as the agreement reached on July 1st of 2004 (not the official date). The paying companies have all been U.S. commercial products-providing or service-providing companies with retail or wholesale business.
Confusion from China has been if this money is actually routed from China's Central Reserve, the answer is Never.
In China, it is a common practice for a commercial company take-in some cash as its income and gives back a commercial receipt together with the remaining amount of the money after its service charge of such commercial receipt. In China's anger, confusion from the Chinese general public is if the money has announced to give to me instead of giving back to some unknown corrupted Chinese government officials. The answer is this is an incorrect assumption. In the United States, this type of activities is a severe crime, Federal and State, to all parties involved. The company involved would be charged with conducting the money-laundry crime（洗钱罪名）, the criminal charge against me would be "unknown source of money"(财产来源不明罪）。
This money that paying company provided are the profits from their daily business operations on the U.S. soil, such as selling goods or providing services. As the paying companies have testified, the paying companies are all upon each's lawfully registered investor-company's instruction to give me this money from each's profits instead of hand-in to each's lawfully registered investor-company.
2: Exactly, what is Min Fang's own money and what is Min Fang's Trust's money？
My explanation: I heard yesterday's broadcasting has explained why my same parents' younger brother or my father side cousins don't have any inheritable-share to claim in my willed Trust-inheriting, which is the explanation official given according to the People's Republic of China's inheriting laws and entrusting laws, as well as the United States' and Britain's inheriting laws and entrusting laws. This morning's broadcasting further clarified more confusion about money's lawful ownership.
So, according to each of my grandfather's will and according to laws, I am the sole beneficiary person to each Trust I inherited, why I only state my yearly providing is my own money? It is because my Trusts are all business entities that have been investing. All the money in-investing are in-investment-usage money that only the profits after business investment consideration can be for my personal usage. Once this profits money transferred out of my Trusts' business investing activities, it is entirely my own money because I am the sole beneficiary person of my Trusts. By the way, this is the same concept for the very common investor-tax in the U.S. and Europe -- Once the money out of business investing, it is the investor's personal income needs to pay investor-tax.
----October 26th, 2018
1：究竟什么是方敏自己的钱应该由美国政府交给方敏使用？
我的解释：这钱是由方敏的信托在美国的投资公司按照2004年7月1日（非正式日期）和美国财政部达成的协议转入美国财政部的财务服务办公室并支付相应的手续费用，由美国财政部负责转入我方敏的私人使用账户。付款公司都是美国的商务实业或者商务服务公司，都有批发或者零售经营的实体店面。
来自中国的困扰就是这些付款公司的钱款给付是否其实是来自中国国库的钱，回答：从来不是。
一间商业公司在收取费用后，将转入该公司的某一笔钱再转回给汇款者的其他账户并附一张该公司的商务发票，在中国是一种很平常的现象。来自中国的一片愤怒中，中国普通老百姓的愤怒是这些公开宣布必须给方敏的钱是否其实是从中国国库出来的钱，没直接转回给那几个匿名的贪官而是宣布给了方敏。回答：这是一种谬误和错觉。在美国，对所有参与人员和机构来说，这种做法都是严重的刑事犯罪行为。对于参与公司来说，是刑事洗钱罪，对我方敏来说，是刑事财产来源不明罪*。
这些付款公司所给付的钱都是由这些付款公司在美国领土上的每天或销售商品或提供商业服务等等的商业经营活动所产生的商业盈利中支付的。就像这些付款公司的作证说明，这些付款公司都是在其法律上有效注册的合法投资公司的指示下才将其应该上交给该投资公司的商业盈利分红转交支付给我使用的。
2：究竟什么是方敏自己的钱，什么是方敏的信托的钱？
我的解释：我听说昨天的广播剧播出内容，按照中华人民共和国，美国及英国的继承法和信托法，解释了为什么我同父同母的弟弟以及我父系的亲戚们在那些我按遗嘱所继承的信托里没有一丝一毫的可继承份额。据说今天早上的播出是进一步依据法律阐明谁才是哪些钱财的合法主人。
这样说来，按照我每一个爷爷的遗嘱以及按照法律，我是我所继承的每一个信托的唯一受益人，那我为什么只说我每年应受到的生活费给付才是我自己的钱？这是因为我的那些信托都是些经营机构一直都在进行商业投资活动。所有这些放在投资经营里的钱都是正在商业投资使用中的钱，就只有那些不作为投资使用的每年盈利部分才可以转出我的信托的商业投资活动，以作为我的私人给付使用。一旦这些钱转出我的信托的商业投资活动，因为我是信托的唯一受益人，所有这些钱就都是我自己的钱。顺便提一句，这和在欧美很平常的投资人税是同一种概念，就是某笔钱一旦离开商业投资活动，就是该钱的合法主人即投资人的个人收入所得需要缴纳投资人税。
*有关什么是财产来源不明罪，2004年1月时，很多人都听说我以前住过的曼哈顿那家人和我为一个房子的什么事有过矛盾。这个矛盾的起因就是我在2004年1月被调查我为何有钱买了一套70-100万美金的房子。我就没听懂怎么回事，一直以为是那家人以我的名字向银行贷款也不和我说一声，让我以后自己想贷款买房子都没有贷款额度。但我当时已经解释了那房子不是我的，那家人有钱可以支付其20%的首付。
----2018年10月26日。
10-25-2018 The Abnormalities Related to My Romances
Yesterday, I said in Chinese that rumored biologically real four Chinese British children definitely do not carry my blood. Reason? Well, if you have heard a miserable Shanghai girl died at age of 31years old in the 1970s, you can hear a lot of similarities in those featured broadcasting. Anything she wanted should be her cousins to enjoy or to give-out which including those males who she attracted to. She died with wrenched a heart and all her cousins' hate. In this rumored story, all were because her father set up a sole beneficiary Trust in Hong Kong for her in 1946 when she was only one year's old which conditioned her inheriting should be after she had a lovely birth child of her own. And Albert Gore's famous Chinese romance is rumored this girl's father side fourth cousin, now one won't feel surprised a bit why those four Chinese British children announced as Albert Gore's Chinese romance's first cousin's children yesterday on the public media and why I have publicly accused Albert Gore has robbed me publicly through the radio program's producing efforts.
The most horrible part of this rumor is Albert Gore's Chinese romance's maiden family and some other related families did get good sized money from that Shanghai girl's Trust after her death, because that Trust became a no-owner Trust after that Shanghai girl's death which became Chinese Foreign Department's negotiable with the British government, being her father-side cousins who have worked for Chinese foreign Department, Albert Gore's Chinese romance's maiden family benefited from the negotiation. It was rumored all Shanghai girl's cousins were not eligible for Next Kin inheriting to her Trust because they were the reasons for her early and miserable death. Now you won't feel uncomfortable to say "No wonder it feels like as if everyone is waiting for the Chinese woman Min Fang to be abused to death which has been announced so loudly on the radio, as if nothing should be wrong with it even in such a lawful country like the United States", and all these loud announcements were rumored announced by Albert Gore and his Chinese romance, obviously with the experiences and with the victory hauls. So, I expressed myself to the United States Laws as a citizen to the U.S. that I refuse to be a victim of such possible negotiations between any governments (governing agencies).
I also stated in Chinese yesterday on my blog that I have been really lucky that other than my romance has not been "normal" compared to others, I have been overall well enough which are factually true because I quietly inherited in 2004, my financial providing have been quietly paid-out on time as decided in 2004, and I have quietly enjoyed some of the handsome providings. And I am looking forward to enjoying my living situation changes soon enough, and to meet someone around some corners to get lost in his handsome eyes soon enough. Some would say I should add if I am, a victim or not, in the situation to move on, well, I say I am a polygamist.
Well, if anyone asks how "unnormal" my romances had been, well, the first one would be when I was in China, those males only had shown up only to tell me they had been interested in me and went disappeared immediately to get busy on their own dating if I did not dislike their interesting presentations, and showed up again 10 years later to repeat such interesting presentation and also did repeat the same "disappeared to get busy on dating without my involvement", and have expressed their agonies so loudly when the repetitive same presentations not producing the expected results.
The second would be why Rs' women have been so agitated as if they would be so threatened by me when my biological daughter already publicly announced impressively as (if) carrying F's name so long ago in 2011? Because I am a woman expecting the traditional polygamist male's privileges? but themselves are not the eligibles to have such an illusion.
The third would be those efforts to throw me a left-over male who is the father of some woman's child if not children already, and those efforts to confuse the public if I am even eligible to have a romance at all, etc.
----October 25th, 2018
10-24-2018 传说中真实的中英混血的四个小孩真的和我无关，以及其他
听说了有个英国的于家小姐替年轻的英国王储W生了（4+1）个小孩，难怪华人圈里一直说有4个真实的小孩。不过，你要是听说过上海的那个于家小姐信托故事，听说过那上海于小姐是如何喜欢上一个就被她的堂姐妹爱上一个嫁了一个或者推荐给了其好姊妹一个，又听说这个生孩子的英国于家小姐是阿尔伯特·高尔那个华人恋人中国外交部前雇员居住纽约的于小姐的一等亲，也就是在上海的于家小姐没孩没婚没任何男人爱而在31岁时就忧郁悲惨去世之后拿到了上海于家小姐的父亲替上海于小姐所设立的信托里的一部分钱的那些北方于家人中的一个，那你就知道不管这英国于小姐生孩子故事及其相关故事是真是假，确实没有我方敏可以说三道四的，也就是强调那几个小孩确实和我没有任何关系。
我真是很幸运了，直到2004年，除了找不到适合结婚的对象，我还算是安全，既顺利继承了信托也已经享受到了信托给付的医疗照顾。上海的于家小姐，就因为父亲的爱希望她能有个有爱的婚姻所定下的条款，连一分钱的生活费用给付都没有享受到。说到谈恋爱，我在中国遇见的几个，就是什么李克强（李政纲），小贺（贺国强), 等等，都是很奇怪的，在我方敏表达有兴趣之后就立即失踪了，过上十年八年再来露个脸看我没反感就又立即失踪了，在失踪期间的恋爱都是谈的红红火火的，现在方敏我知道其中原因了，原来是有个丁家私人助理一家可能在隐形操纵（据说丁家私人助理认识上海于家小姐的父系于家亲戚）。我还算是幸运，确实没认为需要他们这些老伙的一身老皮才可以够资格在人前晃晃，也没和他们多说几句话，所以确实也没因他们的失踪而悲愤而忧郁。估计也就因为我如此太不悲凉，所以这几个人对我这态度的愤怒是全世界都听到了“你他妈的算老几，把钱拿来！”。至于在美国碰见的几个，都是因为他们自己经历的原因。
现在，要是依据广播剧对我方敏的宣布，也就是纽约的于小姐以及其恋爱男友阿尔伯特·高尔，还有中国的李克强和贺国强的婚姻亲朋等等的高调宣布，根本就是上海于家小姐当年的遭遇，就是不准有孩子，不准被男人爱，不准有任何婚姻，再加上就只配让中国政府给杀了然后把钱归他们所有。可惜我坚决不乐意所以我就坚决持续不停的报警了。
我个人的一些看法及我听到的道听途说：
1：我就一直痛骂中国政府外交部的种种做法根本是一家妓院外交部，结果听说中国外交部在1949年，1950年大批雇佣了当时对中国共产党新政府的态度立场友善的妓院子弟（因为外交部的开明态度不会因其父母职业而妨碍他们成为国家干部），也就是说中华人民共和国外交部当年就是如此起家的。
2：我就一直很愤怒美国政府外交部在处理美国广播公司的广播剧事件上的“不见影子任由中国方面无理造谣诽谤谩骂“的立场，结果我听说美国外交部的华裔雇员是和中国外交部方面就此交涉的人员，而这些华裔雇员是中国五四运动时被学生痛骂的北洋政府那些人的后裔，他们现在都是美国这个移民国家的一部分。
*北洋政府是当时北伐军政府和清朝洋务运动政府的混合体，五四学生最著名的口号是“外争主权，内惩国贼.”。
3:我就一直奇怪为什么这个纽约的于小姐就是要定了那个由香港我爷爷替我设立的信托在2004年汇往美国的我的五亿美金。
据说是因为洛杉矶华人都知1965年的洛杉矶的于李两家就香港的李家信托应该归谁的争执而引发的洛杉矶华人大规模械斗早就让纽约的那个于小姐的洛杉矶于家亲戚赢得了香港的李家信托，据说是这个洛杉矶于家的孙子在坚称已经打赢了所以拥有了香港的李家信托公司。结果我听说这根本就是没发生过的事情。
我听说的是那个洛杉矶的李家和香港李家信托完全无关，（我还不太清楚我和李家信托是否有关），而香港方面也从未听说洛杉矶的于家父子找了一个洛杉矶姓李的打架打赢了就拥有了该香港李家信托公司的传闻，而洛杉矶的于家父子也没打赢，却是因为召集械斗并造成洛杉矶李家的人员伤亡而被洛杉矶警方给关进了监狱，据说于家的父亲死在了监狱里于家的儿子现在还在监狱里。
----2018年10月24日。
10-23-2018 Some power to "Drag you to death" is from the Chinese community in West Coast
It is well-known to the entire world that I have been a victim of a ridiculous Chinese government who insist on threatening me to demand money without any legal ground, I took every bit of those swears and blackmails that this 2012- administration of the Chinese government helped to broadcast worldwide through the American radio company to be intentionally malicious, but how this 12-hours flight-away government can be so almighty powerfully impact my life in the United States?
By the United States government's help? of course, one would imagine there would be some. But obviously, it has been emphasized the United States is a lawful country because I am protected by laws. Some of the evidence are: 1)I haven't been evicted from my current residence as well as the United States. 2:) I received the handsome medical treatment providing that I needed. 3) My living expenses providing have been in process of validating if lawful money, and first 3 years already have been clarified lawful. 4:) My 2004 inheriting has been validated lawful.
Also, with so many countries which includes Britain and France have declared their determination to stay as lawful countries, with the evidence that I am still the tolerated individual to be the most famous French financier of the most famous British East India Company, what could be the possible reasons that I can be so impacted by the may-be-very-evil Chinese government so far away?
I have stated some time ago that I am comfortably quiet now because I am protected by laws obviously, and I only have two major sources of own money which are my intellectual incomes and my yearly living expenses providing as a beneficiary to my Trusts. By the way, I heard the Chinese government's anger is why my intellectual incomes can be claimed by whoever but not them from China? I have to say it is illegal to claim-to-own my intellectual incomes in the United States and I heard what happened has been under law-investigation already.
But, with all my intellectual incomes already "taken" at the moment whenever any new incomes are available to be collected, why I am still under the pressure as if to be "drag to death"?
Also, I have denounced myself from the China and Chinese communities abroad in March or so this year of 2018, because being the heir to my ancient Tang dynasty Emperor grandfathers, all my grandfathers and my father and myself don't owe China nor Chinese communities abroad this hate that my father and I have experienced since 2004, but why still this pressure after I sent the denouncement letter to the Chinese government?
After I heard two "drag to death" stories, one from Shanghai, China and one from San Francisco, the United States, I started paying attention to who has this confidence that kills a sole beneficiary person to de-own a Trust can be a route to get money from that Trust. I kind of getting the impression this confidence is from the United States West Coast Chinese community, Los Angels and San Francisco areas to be specific. Evidence: 1) The Chinese director of this radio program, a rumored Boston resident currently, a fourth generation Chinese immigrant came from San Francisco area who also rumored participated such story. 2:) Current dragging-on powerhouse on radio program related is from the rumored 3rd or 4th generations immigrants from the San Franciso or Los Angels area. 3:) In that two "drag to death" stories, both rumoed victims were sole beneficiary persons to the Trusts set up in Hong Kong in the 1940s. 4:) Tons of Chinese rich person have settled in Los Angels and San Francis area after they fled China around the year 1948-1949.
----October 23rd, 2018
10-22-2018 Boston's Almighty Highness Magic 106.7FM radio station
Boston's magic 106.7FM radio station is the almighty highness radio station who so deserves to supervise all business in greater Boston area if I happen to be a client of, this has been my complaint to law people since 2015.
This supervision style is to keep an eye on my every move in that business including every interaction, even eye contacts, between me and the staff of the business that is under this radio station's so deserved supervision. It has never been just microphones all over the places but cameras.
I heard this co-operative under-supervision has been established by these business' public relation offices, in responding to this radio station's promoting radio program efforts. And this promoting effort radiate from Boston to every corner of the world by its global marketing team to anyone if curious about this radio program's major featured person. The promoting theme has always been: "That Chinese woman Min Fang is a never-wanted fake talent who has no money of her own and don't deserve any money at all from the radio program's over 10 years worldwide successful broadcasting as well, and don't ever listen to anything this Chinese woman Min Fang says." This morning, if you know the channel that still broadcasting the radio program, you should have heard all the reasons why they have been so dedicated doing all these to me after I have made so much money for this radio station's company.
In 2015, my income of major featured person fee from this radio program's worldwide broadcasting had accumulated to over $4Billion, the radio company's profits from this radio program have accumulated to over $12 Billion which does not include those other broadcasting radio companies profits. Till today, I have not received a penny but all these abusiveness in my life in Boston of Massachusetts and all those curses and blackmails you have heard on the radio since 2014.
I heard this morning's broadcasting was sparked by my yesterday's blog article of new treatment technology for Alzheimer patients which has already been available to commercial hospitals. One of this radio station's anchor host Nancy Quill has been dedicated to promoting Alzheimer's awareness, so I was accused that why I am the person announce such a great news on my blog which I responded with: "As if I am still eligible to contact anyone at all from this almighty highness Boston's Magic 106.7FM radio station."
I heard the reasons given by this radio station's staff in this morning's broadcasting are:
1: I spend Rockefellers' money in 2004 which is what they are revenging on behave of.
My response: I have complained about Rockefellers about this matter to U.S. General Attorney's office because I never intended and I never spent any of Rockefellers' any money.
2: I did not participate in producing efforts of the radio program is the reason I don't deserve major featured person fee no matter how profitable this radio program has been.
My response: The fact that my share is the same as the producing team was decided based on the fact that producing team would produce this radio program independently but based on my life experiences and audio materials I myself provided. Most of the stories featured before 2015 have been my life experiences before 2004 which were based on the abstracts from my own security tapes that I myself bought from an agency, not a security company, for a total of $400Million in 2004.
3: Being the radio station's staff, they know the truth of all these fake romances.
My response: Why they ignore the facts who are the liars told all these fake romances?
4: Being the radio station's staff, they won't tolerate me to spend other people's money in any place for any reason.
My response: In the United States, a radio station has never been privileged to be equivalent to a law enforcement unit. And I never spend other people's money. My horrifying experiences have been they stalk me everywhere I have any dealing with.
----October 22nd, 2018
10-21-2018 A five-minutes Alzheimer surgery and overnight recovery ---- Win back one-month precious space lost in current battle (老年痴呆(五分钟手术，过夜恢复)--就可以收复一个月的失地）
June 21st in 2018, a sunny Sunday, should be a happy celebration Sunday for every teary struggling person who is a caregiver to an Alzheimer family senior: The cure for Alzheimer is on its way. The rough timing is: the instrument's how-to related training for surgeons may need about a month, the frustration is any new order of the surgical instrument may need some longer time.
The greatest news is only a five-minutes surgery can dramatically takes-back the ground that has been lost in a month time in the current hard battle against Alzheimer, and even a severely progressive patient can recover from this 5-minutes surgery in just overnight time. This is such an affordable and so daily applicable surgery technology is the huge proud for the entire technology invention team.
This is the same or similar surgical instrument for new cancer surgery technology, the updates of this technology are the options of how to retain those biological cells in the local surgical area, please ask this instrument's manufacturing company about more information on this option.
最好的消息是就只要5分钟的手术就可以夺回目前治疗技术下一个月的失地，重症进行性病人也可以在手术隔夜后恢复一个月前的状态。这是能让老年痴呆的病人在经济上身体上都可以每天承受的一种手术技术，这项技术如此可承受是其所有参与研发人员的骄傲。
这是一种和癌症新治疗技术一样或者类似的手术设备，技术的更新是在如何选择保留手术区域的细胞，请向手术设备的制造商查询该选项手术技术的详细信息。
----(All the important information about new Alzheimer treatment is in above section)----
How I stick my neck into this proud of this new treatment technology for Alzheimer? It already has been such an anger to a lot of devoted cancer treatment researchers that I contributed curing cancer by suggesting conduct "several times of Hemodialysis after each surgery" to prevent spreading, how about this time?
Well, that suggestion of "at least three times of Hemodialysis after each surgery" is based on the medical college textbook knowledge from "Organs and Tissues" that any element in a cell will penetrate into body-fluid and then further penetrate into blood which means Hemodialysis (blood filtering technology) will remove malicious elements in blood, but it takes a couple of days for malicious elements in body-fluid to penetrate into blood, and more days for malicious elements in cells to eventually penetrate into blood to be removed.
It is very unfair to a lot of devoted cancer research personnel to watch my name associated with curing cancer by this advice, but it is truly my advice that rings the bell for those frustrated cancer treatment providers about spreading prevention, "at least three times of Hemodialysis after each surgery" is absolutely needed and it is the advice. I am very proud that my textbook knowledge serves well in this curing cancer contribution.
This time, I put it very accurately as co-discover the option of how to retain biological cells in surgical local areas. Those other co-discovery persons are medical personnel, what I contributed is I advised them how to make complicated computer mouse-clicks to get the desired retaining selections, and a bit more.
I have a lot of trouble with a lot of people that I never even heard of keep yelling at me where is their own money as if I would know, which frustrated me that I kept addressing them as "Down syndromes" because they are too young to be called Alzheimer-s.
On a Sunday, I was jokingly saying I need some special attention on the "Down syndrome strip" when I went to a Walmart store in Quincy of Massachusetts, I bypassed a sign raising the awareness for Alzheimer-s. So, I was corrected that my attention should be directed to "Alzheimer strip" because my concern is not because of birth-defect. So, today which is the next Sunday, I have this article on my blog spreading the happy news of curing Alzheimer, and I will celebrate that I successfully stick my neck into this proud of this new treatment technology for Alzheimer.
----October 21st of 2018, a Sunday.
10-20-2018 Three Rules of Discipline and Eight Points for Attention（三大纪律八项注意）
The difference between communism and looting should be if to share self-own or if to grab others-own. Well, if the sharing is own wife, grabbing is whoever's "any kind of wealth", no wonder I am a no-sexuality female screaming this entire time. （共产主义和抢掠的区别似乎应该是愿意分享自己所拥有的还是只想抢别人所拥有的。不过，如果愿意分享的是自己老婆，想抢的是别人的“任何好东西”，难怪就我这个暂无性欲之女子整天在惨嚎。）
Since 1921, the Chinese communist party has been working on to differentiate communism with looting. All those Chinese riches who were lucky enough to survive in Taiwan may have complained Chinese communist party had been lootings through and through while Chinese communist party has been emphasizing “Three Rules of Discipline and Eight Points for Attention（三大纪律八项注意）*” for all its members to obey since 1927 or so. （从1921年中国共产党成立，中国共产党就致力于区别什么共产主义运动以及共产主义以及与抢劫掠夺的区别是什么。那些幸运的逃到了台湾生存下来的前中国富人可能是痛骂中国当年的共产主义根本就是抢劫和掠夺，而中国共产党自1927年起就已经三令五申的强调三大纪律八项注意是铁的纪律。）
---- October 20th, 2018
Reference：
*三大纪律：
“Three Rules of Discipline and Eight Points for Attention (三大纪律八项注意）”
An alternative, more literal translation into English was presented by the People's Daily.[2]
10-19-2018 More about anger：Anger from Chinese community（来自华裔社区的愤怒）
1 Question： "Money ownership should be according to Laws, then why you insist on to have that money?"
My answer： I explained that I inherited some Trusts according to Laws in 2004, the explanation about those providing money was given as "upon instructions from their lawfully registered owners according to Laws". Above explanations are both according to Laws about providing money which I have insisted on to have.
（1 华裔社区问：“钱的拥有权应该是根据法律的合法所有权，那你为什么一再坚持那是你的钱？”
我的回答：我已经解释了我是按照法律在2004年继承了几个信托，有关那些生活费用给付，付款公司给予的解释是：都是根据法律注册登记上的公司合法投资拥有者的指示按照法律予以支付”。以上两点解释都是根据法律，所以我一再坚持那些生活费用给付是我的钱。）
2 Question： "If that is your money, why I don't have a share?"
My answer：My Trust-Inheriting was according to wills so that I am the sole beneficiary to all the Trusts I inherited which definitely means no one else has a single share.
（2 华裔社区问：“如果那是你的钱，为什么那里面没有我的钱？”
我的回答：我的信托继承都是按照每一个信托的遗嘱继承的每一个信托，所以我是我所继承的所有信托的唯一受益人，也就是说就没有任何其他人的任何一分钱在我所继承的所有信托里面。）
3 Question： "Sole-beneficiary and Trust-inheriting are both your own saying which not necessary means lawful saying, and I don't believe any of them."
My answer： If you have doubts on your own possible inheritable share, please believe consulting attorneys about inheriting related laws is the best choice. I can only provide some obvious tips here: My both parents were healthy alive in 2004 and providing money I stated are all originated from outside China.
（3 华裔社区问： “唯一受益人及信托继承都是你自说自话并不一定是法律上的说法，我是一个字都不会相信。”
我的回答：如果你对你自己那一份可能的继承份额有疑问，请向律师咨询继承相关法律应该是你最好的选择。我可以提供一些非常明显的真实线索：我的父母双亲在2004年时都很健康也都健在，我所宣称的我的生活费用给付都是由中华人民共和国境外地区的公司所支付提供的。）
My frustration has been: Believe my explanations or not, all these providing money is the money no other Chinese has any association with. It has been too ridiculous for so many Chinese screaming to me about where their own money is while knowing I have no financial nor social association with them.
（我的愤怒：相信不相信我所给予的解释，就没有任何华人能和所有这些我所宣称的生活费用给付搭界, 却来了一堆和我既从无金钱往来也没任何社交往来的人对着我连嘶代吼的干嚎质问他们自己的钱在那里，简直是某明奇妙至极。）
4 Question： "Why you kept on insulting so many people and the Chinese government?"
My answer： I understand the entire situation and most of my troubles are from their intentional malicious efforts, so my answer-statement should be: I have been returning their "courtesy" as my own care-free expression, just my learning experiences of being my own way of witty smart.
（4 华裔社区问：“你为什么老是羞辱挑衅那么多人以及中国政府？”
我的回答：我认为整起事件以及我所有的麻烦都是由这些人及中国政府一些人明知真相而恶意胡言故意所为所造成的，所以我的回答应该是：我也就是在用着同样的毫不在乎地态度对他们所做的一切礼尚往来而已，就当练习练习我自已独特风格的“机智对应聪敏利齿”吧。）
----October 19th, 2018
Anger from other Communities（来自其他社区的愤怒）:
Question："You can't keep claiming other people's wealth to be yours to own!"
My answer：I claimed I am the sole beneficiary person of some Trusts I inherited. The confusion of these paying companies' lawful ownership is beyond my knowledge as a beneficiary person whose Trusts may have invested in these paying companies. Please consult those paying companies regarding your confusion about their lawful ownership, and please consult attorneys regarding your confusion about what Trust-Inheriting or sole beneficiary person is.
My confusion about one American company in 2016 has been corrected as that American company is 100% solely owned by its lawfully registered investor which is the British East India Company's British Financier.
(其他社区问：“你不能老是把别人的财产宣布成你自己的!"
我的回答：我宣称的是：我是我所继承信托的唯一受益人。至于那些向我支付生活费用的公司的法律所有权困绕，我的那些信托可能有投资在这些公司里，但这些公司的法律所有权并不是我作为这些信托的受益人可能会知道的信息。如果你对于这些付款公司的法律所有权有困扰，请向这些付款公司咨询；如果你对什么是信托继承及什么是唯一受益人有困绕，请向律师公司咨询。
至于我2016年时对一家美国公司法律所有权的困扰，我已经纠正了我的说法，其正确说法是：这家美国公司是100%由其合法注册的投资者英国公司所独家拥有，该英国公司是著名的英国东印度公司的主要英国投资公司。
----October 19th, 2018
10-18-2018 The anger from cousins and friendly (方家亲戚以及一些友好人士的愤怒）
From my cousins（亲戚的愤怒）:
1: Their family seniors were not cared for by me the same way as I cared for my parents.
My answer: My parents' marriage family is the poorest among my father-side relatives. In 2004, the understanding of my parents' health care was good health-insurance and some retirement pension which were both affordable to my father side relatives' own finance. In the meeting, the decision was they buy their insurances in China, and I gave them the gift of over $80Million in U.S. dollar in years later which would be around 2014 or 2015. They still have not received the gifts is beyond my control.
1：他们家的老人没有被我想我自己父母一样照顾着.
我的回答：我父母的婚姻家庭是我父系亲戚里最穷的一个。2004年，我给我父母所做的安排，当时的理解就是一个好的医疗保险及一份普通的退休工资，这些在当时就是我父系亲戚们自己就有也买得起的。在会上当时提到的就是，他们自己在中国买保险，我在2014或者2015年左右给他们一家一份超过8千万美金的礼物（即五亿人民币）。他们至今没有收到礼物是因为事件发展不在我的掌控之中。
My anger is I only receive a Trust of $15Million in 1948, and I gave them each over $80 Million which is 5 times of the total of the year 1948's size for each, why it is ridiculous for them to buy their own insurance for the time being? All either can afford to have good one or having good company-offered insurance, either small business owner (“个体户”自己做生意) or college graduated having a good retirement.
我的愤怒是：我继承的信托在1948年设立时就只有一千五百万美金（五百万大洋），而我2004年愿意给他们的是每家超过八千万美金（即五亿人民币）的一份礼物，他们自己付钱买一份他们买的起的保险怎么就变成离谱了？他们所有的人都是要么做“个体户”自己做生意已经好多年了，要么大学毕业有一份很好的公费医疗退休金。
Those Trusts I inherited were from my father-side grandfathers, my mother side relatives are not who I owe which is not to say they are not my relatives, other than my mother's eldest sister who had been nice to me before her own child-adoption which was when I was 12 years old. Her relentless fierce efforts after her own adoption to make her own home a clearly-owned place to her own adopted daughter had already pushed me very clearly in my own parents' place only, her husband passed away before 2004. So, as I stated early in my blog, as long as she had what she needed when she was sick, I am comfortable not being the one who should be around and I don't owe her family more than this because of her and her family's attitude towards my mother. My mother worked her food as a maid when she grew up in her eldest sister's place since my mother was 11 years old, but my mother was never a doomed-maid person to her eldest sister, nor to her eldest sister's family".
（我妈妈那边的亲戚，除了我妈妈的大姐，我是谁也没欠，这不是在说他们不是亲戚，而是说我继承的是我父系爷爷们给我的礼物。我妈妈的大姐在我十一二岁左右她领养她自己的小孩以前对我非常好。她领养了自己的小孩以后就坚持用各种方式强调她自己的家是她自己所领养的小孩所拥有的，她这份持续不懈的努力早就让我非常非常地清楚我父母的家才是我唯一的家，她丈夫是在2004年以前就去世了。所以，就像我曾经在我博文里曾经提到的，在我妈的大姐生病去世之前，她可以收到所需要的公费医疗以外的医疗以其他照顾，我就很自在，我不觉得我是应该需要亲身照顾陪伴她的那一个，我也不觉得我亏欠她家里比这更多就因为他们一家对我母亲的态度。我的母亲从十一二岁起是在她的这个大姐家里长大的直到我父母结婚，我妈妈必须协助独立操持家务才能有口饭吃是我妈妈自己的认知，那些家务事做得动做不动都是她必须做的是我妈妈告诉我的她的成长经历，我认为我妈妈是做工挣得她自己的成长伙食费，对我妈妈的大姐及我妈妈大姐的家庭来说，我妈妈并不应该被认为是他们家里一个“永远都改变不了地位的”的低贱保姆而已。）
2: Why I refuse to give them that "over $80Million in U.S. dollars" in 2004.
My answer: That is a gift, not I owe. I do have the privilege to decide when and how to gift. I have the concern that they would get into some trouble that already existed in that meeting which was so many ridiculous demands to have some money.
（2：为什么我拒绝在2004年就送给他们这每家超过80万美金的礼物。
我的回答：那是礼物不是欠债，我愿意什么时候给怎么给就什么时候给怎么给。我当时就是担心他们卷入当时在会上就已经存在的一堆某明奇妙的要钱要求。）
I said in that meeting I have this gift allocated for my father's siblings and my grandfather's siblings because they were relatives to me and my father, and I asked them to try not to get involved with those who don't have this kind of gift from me. Those are the people I never owe a bit. All these noises you heard that they deserve to have some money were in that meeting to bilk and fiercely demand money already, all behaved as if I owe them. They are the people I never even heard of till they harmed me, I never owed them a penny and I never owed them any kindness that ever from them. Why would I ever reward those people I never even heard of just because they dare to harm for money or they dare to bilk for money?
（我当时已经说了，我有这每家一份给我父亲弟妹及我爷爷弟妹的礼物准备好了也特别安置好了，我让他们尽量别卷入那些没有这份类似礼物的人的吵闹不休。我没欠了那些人的。你们现在能听到的就是应该拿钱的吵闹声在2004年7月1日那天就有，不停的在那儿不是讹就是诈，都是一副我欠了他们似的。而在他们伤害我之前，我根本就没听说过他们，更没欠他们一分一厘的钱债，也没欠他们一丝一毫的人情债。我为什么要奖励他们就是敢伤害我就是一定要钱反正不是讹就是诈的这份努力？）
My anger towards my father side cousins is why they can't consult laws to know that "over $80Million" is never what I owe but a gift.
（我对我父系的亲戚的愤怒就是：他们为什么不做法律咨询以了解我从来没有欠了他们的，就只是在送礼而已。）
From friendly（友好人士的愤怒）:
They have been friendly to me without any expectation as conditions, but why I disappreciate them as such?
My answer: Never my intention but the reason I have called for laws' help.
Since 2004 which was soon after July 1st of 2004 if not immediately after the meeting, the enormous efforts I complained to laws about have been "who hates me or who is willing to harm me should deserve anything I lawfully own, and only negativenesses can be allowed to reach to those who have once been nice and friendly to me". I have complained to laws since 2015 when I myself has become a clear victim of this obvious hate crime.
他们对我友善从未有过附加条件也没有过什么不切实际的幻想，但我为什么对他们如此不稀罕？
我的回答：这不是我的本意而是我报警的原因。
这是从2004年就开始甚至是从2004年7月1日开完会就立即开始的，我向法律所投诉的就是：有这么很大的一份努力就是要表达：“仇恨我的人就应该得到我所拥有的，对我友善的就只配没好事”。我是从2015年当我自己已经明显成为这种仇恨犯罪的受害者时就已经报警了。
----October 13th, 2018
I am happy to hear that Trusts set up for me by five of my near grandfathers (including my father's father) have been validated, and also my family tree. I am a 6th-outside cousin to the wife who I "never heard of".（听说离我最近的五代爷爷（包括我父亲的父亲）替我设立的信托被证实了，还有我家的族谱， 我还真是挺高兴的。原来我和那个做老婆，也就是我说“从未听说过的”那个，还真是6等亲以外的族亲。估计她和我爷爷是一辈的，要是五等亲以内，我估计就得叫她姑奶奶的。）
10-16-2018 伟哥的智慧产权 （Viagra's Intellectual Income confusion)
听说了今天早上伟哥的智慧产权的“Done deal"让很多华人不太明白，也听说了今天早上已经提到，是付款的药业公司和真正收到钱的人做的“就这样了”这句中文翻译造成的困扰。我也就只做一个小小的解读提示：这两个人中间还有个一个因为智慧产权人员收款手续不完备而无法向智慧产权人员付款的律师公司，该律师公司不知为何却把钱给了这个今天早上提到的真正收到钱的人，所以这两个“就这样了”，不一定是同一个具体细节。(About "done deal" this morning, I heard it was from both recipient of the money and evaluating management. So, the decoding reference is: there is a law firm got stuck in between who supposed to hold this money till the confusion resolved, but somehow this law firm gave this money to this morning's recipient instead is the argument. So, the "done deal" may not mean the same meaning. )
我听着这事情的经过大概是：药业公司因为某些原因无法寄出该智慧产权的通知领取函（挂号信），或者因为某些原因该挂号信寄出后，智慧产权人员没有收到，该律师公司因为没有收到应由药业公司给与的该通知领取函的挂号信回执而无法确定付款手续是否完备，所以不能付款，是造成目前状态的原因。(From what I gathered, either the company can't mail out the certified letter for some reason, or the mailed out letter has not been received, that the law firm has not received the certified letter receipt from the company is the reason that the law firm can't start the paying process which is the confusion that needs to be resolved.)
----October 16th, 2018
10-15-2018 Is private assistant's family a Down syndrome family(私人助理那一家子是不是都是唐氏综合症病人啊？）
First, about the other day's blog article(10-12-2018 Spoiled females), I echo what has been clarified this morning that I mistook the husband as a friendly figure from one of the 2004's meetings I participated. Also, this morning's broadcasting clarified that the wife's maiden family name has the record that can be traced back to over 800 years ago which indicates clearly they do not any association with me, and I agree this certainly means we don't share blood at least for this 800 years. （先澄清10月12日博文所提到的，我错以为做丈夫的是和我在2004年会议上有过友善交谈的一位，还有做妻子的提到他娘家的800年族谱和我一点关系都没有，我同意这证明，虽然都姓方，但至少这800年是一点血缘关系都没有。）
Also, the Li's Family mentioned in this morning's broadcasting is actually a Li's Cluster in the People's Republic of China, this is the same family I referred to as the Stamped heir family. Their family's last name is Li which of course the reason made them the Li's clan. I called them the stamped heir cluster because, according to the rumors I hear, they claimed they are the heir of Tang dynasty only because they have a stamped letter stated so from the 1950s, by the People's Republic of China's government which was formed in 1949, based on the signatures collected by Wang Zhen (王震). I heard they have absolutely nothing to do with Hongkong's very famous Li's Family Trust. (有关李氏宗亲，今天早上提到的李氏宗亲其实是中国大陆一家姓李的，就是我说公章继承人的那个李家。他们一家都是姓李的，当然就是李氏宗亲了。我说他们是公章继承人，是因为我听说他们自称是唐朝皇帝的继承人就凭着一张纸，而那张纸是由1949年才成立的中华人民共和国政府在1950年代左右根据王震所收集的群众签名而出具的。我听说他们和香港很有名的一家公司“李家信托”一点关系都没有。）
And, the question of why my grandfather's former private assistant's family has been so stubborn about having a saying over me? When the private assistant was hired in 1949, my father already joined the Chinese Army and left Shanghai ever since, which is the fact already made the private assistant and his family a never associated cluster to my father's marriage family that I born into. As I stated, I had spent five years in the Shanghai First Medical College, I never even heard of this private assistant nor his family at all that entire time. Why, all of sudden, this private assistant that my grandfather had hired as a footman became such a voice of my matter? The secret? It is because one of the daughters-in-law is in Shanghai radio company. So, I refuse this "voice involving into" my any matter. （还有，就是我爷爷以前雇佣的专门为他跑腿的私人助理一家子怎么就是够资格一定要对我的事情指手画脚的？1949年这个私人助理被我爷爷聘用时，我父亲已经参军从此离开了上海，这就已经是我所出生的我父亲婚姻家庭和私人助理一家没有任何交往关系的事实证据了；就像我自己讲的，我在上海第一医学院读了5年，这5年我人就在上海就是从来没听说过这私人助理一家子。怎么，忽然之间，以前替我爷爷跑跑腿的一家现在就可以亮着嗓子对我所有事情都指手画脚的啦？秘密?因为他们家有一房媳妇是上海的广播电台系统的。这样，我就只好公开表态我拒绝他们这种‘声音介入干涉”我的任何事物。）
I heard this private assistant's family has this weird understanding they are taking care matters on behave of the "$10,000 monthly payment story" company to dis-eligible me to have any association with that company to spin me out, this is one of the reasons I questioned if they have the Down syndrome which certainly implies my doubts if they are the born-stupid. If you can have the opportunity to listen to their logic, I say you pretty much can get all the reasons why I asked if they have the Down syndrome. （我听说这个私人助理一家有一种奇怪的理解，他们是在帮助那个每月汇款一万美元的那家公司来处理我让我以后再也不够资格和这家美国公司有任何搭界的地方，也就是他们这样做的结果就可以把我给甩出去了。这是我一直在问这私人助理一家是不是唐氏综合症的原因，当然这意思也就是他们一家是不是都是一群天生的痴呆症患者啊？如果你有机会和他们聊一聊，听听他们说话的逻辑思维，你可能就知道了我为什么问他们一家是不是都是痴呆的所有可能的原因。）
Ever since I heard of this family in this past March or April, I have experienced a lot of surprises how extraordinary their understanding of the matters can be. If you have read my articles about my grandmother, well, that is necessary I have to do based on their broadcasting on Shanghai radio, according to rumors I heard of which says "they are the children fathered by my grandmother's most beloved man and mothered by the relative of my grandfather's most beloved female, so they are the true beloved children to my grandfather's money, that they deserve to own any money I inherited." Will anyone in my shoes doubts if they are the Down syndrome family? So, you heard this morning's emphasis on deep creese on palms as the response from them. （自从我从今年的三四月份开始听说了这一家人，我是一次次经历了他们家对于各种事物的理解如此独特离奇的惊诧和惊恐。如果你有看过我博文里对我奶奶的语言表达，那是因为我听说了他们是如何在上海的广播里谈论我奶奶的， 大意就是：“他们这一族是我奶奶最心爱的男人和我爷爷最心爱的女人的亲戚所生出来的孩子，所以他们才是我爷爷的财产最真爱的孩子们，所以我作为我爷爷奶奶的亲生孙女，我所继承的所有财产应该就是被他们拥有才对。”你要是我的话，你会不会认认真真问一问他们一家是不是都是天生痴呆啊？所以，你们如果听到的今天早上的播出内容，你们就是听到了他们一家对我如此问题的回应也就是对于"横贯掌”的一再强调。）
----October 15th, 2018
This morning's Down syndrome sparks a lot of hush, hush on what is this "a single deep crease across the center of the palm" as a major symptom of the Down syndrome, so I publish the reason of these hush-hush here, and some copied photos from Wikipedia and pasted below.
----October 15th, 2018
Down Syndrome:
(source:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transverse_palmar_crease )
"A few of the common physical traits of Down syndrome are low muscle tone, small stature, an upward slant to the eyes, and a single deep crease across the center of the palm – although each person with Down syndrome is a unique individual and may possess these characteristics to different degrees, or not at all".(source: https://www.ndss.org/about-down-syndrome/down-syndrome/)
"Males are twice as likely as females to have this characteristic, and it tends to run in families. In its non-symptomatic form, it is more common among Asians and Native Americans than among other populations, and in some families, there is a tendency to inherit the condition unilaterally; that is, on one hand only." source:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transverse_palmar_crease )
Useful link to know more about what is Down Syndrome National Down Syndrome Society website
10-14-2018 Why it is Trust-Inheriting instead of Family Inheriting?（为什么是信托继承而不是分家产继承？）
A lot of anger expressed through these couple of weeks' broadcasting is the anger why everyone supports me to "choose Trust-Inheriting over Family Inheriting"?（这两个星期所表达的愤怒都和为什么这么多人都支持我选择信托继承而不按照分家产继承来谈这些钱的法律归属。）
This has been ridiculous to everyone who knows that Trust laws have been applicable for 1000 years but a true question to those who never heard of it. My father-side family has the tradition of setting up a Trust for each under-age son in family inheriting since ancient that Trust-Inheriting is never unheard of in China, but not to everyone as well.（这种愤怒对很多知道信托法已经存在有1000年的人来说实在是无稽直至， 但对很多人从未听说过信托法历史的人来说确实是他们不明白的地方。我爷爷家里自古就有替每一个年幼尚未成年的儿子在分家产时办一份信托，等他们成年后再提取现金的传统，所以中国也是自古就有信托存在，但也不是每一个人都很清楚。）
No one can choose how to inherit because inheriting has been regulated according to laws since ancient time, to if receive wealth from the deceased should be because of either blood or the will is a very common knowledge to most of the people, another aspect related to inheriting is often ignored which is how to receive the wealth from the deceased.（没人可以选择继承的方式，因为自古以来，如何继承财产就已经是由法律所规范的而非个人可以选择的，是否可以从一个去世的人那里继承到财产是由血原关系或者死者的遗嘱所决定的是很多人都知道的常识，但另一个和继承有关的方面却被大多数人所忽视了，就是这死者财产的法律归属是如何从死者名下转入继承者名下的。）
The ownership transferred from the deceased directly to the living, by blood or by will, is the family-inheriting. The ownership transferred from the deceased to the intended recipient through a third party is the Trust-Inheriting.（财产的法律所有权从死者名下直接转入继承者名下的，凭血原关系或者遗嘱继承，都属于分家产继承。如果这财产的法律所有权是从死者名下通过第三方再转入继承者名下的就是信托继承。）
In detail, my Trust-inheriting as an example, my grandfather transferred some money out of his name to "Female palm（女掌)" when he was a living person but I was not born yet, so he asked a third party(attorney) to set up a Trust look after this money he gave to "female palm", so the ownership of this money transferred to the sole beneficiary person "female palm" of the Trust and would be taken care of by this attorney. （具体来说，以我自己的信托继承为例子，我爷爷在他自己还活着时就将他自己的钱转入了“女掌”的名下，但我那时还没有生，所以我爷爷就找了一个律师设立了一个信托来照看这笔他给了“女掌”的钱，所以这笔钱就此从我爷爷的名下转入了该信托的唯一受益人“女掌”的名下并由该律师负责照看。）
So, this money is no longer my grandfather's money once this Trust set up, but owned by the "female palm" who is the sole beneficiary of this Trust. Who should be this female palm and how this female palm can have this money transferred into this female palm's legal government-registry name are all specified in my grandfather's letter(Trust-settler's letter) of how to set up this Trust.（所以说，在这信托设立以后，这笔钱就不再是我爷爷所拥有的了，而是由该信托的唯一受益人“女掌”所合法拥有。谁才是此“女掌”以及该“女掌”如何才能将这笔钱转入该“女掌”的户籍注册名下，都是我爷爷在设立该信托时就已经在其“信托设立人委托书”里就已经规定了的。）
In my grandfather's settler's letter, he specified the female palm should be a girl born from his eldest son Fang, Wenhai (方文海) who also would share his family birthmark as the attached illustration. In 1967, I was born as Fang, Wenhai's lawful and biological daughter who shares my father Fang, Wenhai's and my grandfather's birthmark exactly as that attached illustration in my grandfather's settler's letter. （在我爷爷的“信托设立人委托书”，我爷爷制定了该女掌是其长子方文海所生的女儿，这个女儿有和他自己一样的掌纹（附有掌纹图）。我是1967年出生，是方文海的婚姻所出的亲生女儿，有着和我父亲方文海及我爷爷一模一样的胎记掌纹，就如我爷爷的“信托设立人委托书”的附图所示。）
So, the money of the Trust my grandfather set up in Hong Kong has been my money since 1948, this money was transferred to my legal government-registry name Min Fang (方敏）in 2004 after my inheriting. （所以，这笔钱从1948年我爷爷替我在香港设立信托开始就已经是我的钱了，这笔钱的法律所有权在2004年我继承后转入我的户籍注册名方敏的名下。）
----October 14th, 2018
Anger from the cousin who was presented on July 1st of 2004 why he was not even asked?(2004年7月1日在场的那个亲戚的愤怒"当时明知他在场，却连问都没问他一声。”）
My response: （我的回应:)
Who should ask him about what? (谁需要就什么问题询问他的意见？）
Money was given by my grandfather, the attorney was hired by my grandfather as well, never his mother (one of my father's younger sister) nor himself. The attorney did not need his permission to fulfill my grandfather's entrusting, I don't need his permission to transfer that money into my lawful registry name, why anyone needs to ask him? Plus, inheriting was the day before.（这钱是我爷爷给我的，律师是我爷爷聘请的，从来不是他妈妈的(我爸爸的一个妹妹）更不是他本人的钱。我爷爷聘用的律师不需要他的授权来执行我爷爷的嘱托，我也不需要他的批准才能把钱转入我自己的户籍注册名。谁需要问问他的意见？何况继承是前一天的事。）
He did ask if he has a share in it and he got the "Nope" answer very politely.（他是有问他是不是也有继承份额，他当时就已经听到“没有”的回答啦，回答的态度是非常客气也非常礼貌的。）
I have some anger as well. When my father did not get a penny in 1965's handsome family-inheriting, none of his siblings felt sorry for my father, no comforting for that from them at all, no comforting gift when my father got married nor when his firstborn was born. My mother married a man who only had an empty employee dorm room with a lot of carton boxes has been my family story. All their tones have been "It is the father(my grandfather) who does not willing to give, it is not their fault and it is absolutely none of their business". My father never blames them nor educates us to blame them as his marriage family. （我也是一腔的愤怒。当我父亲在我爷爷1965年去世分家产时一个子都没有分到，他们是一人一万元人民币。我爸爸的三个弟妹就没有觉得我父亲蛮惨的，当时没有安慰一下，我父亲结婚时也没有，我父亲的第一个孩子出生时也没有。我母亲嫁给我父亲时，我父亲就只有一件空空的员工宿舍房间加上几个纸箱子， 这是当时的街坊邻居都知道的我父母婚姻故事。他们态度始终都是“这是做父亲的（我爷爷）不想给，又不是他们的错，管他们什么事。”我父亲从来就没怪过他弟妹一句，更没教育我们这些他自己的婚姻家庭成员去指责他弟妹。）
When I inherited money in 2004 from the same person (my grandfather), I actually gifted them handsomely and they actually have been educating everybody to blame me. What the fuck is this?（我2004年继承的是同一个人（我爷爷）给的钱，我还有送一份不薄的礼物给他们，他们居然还到处教育别人来一起指责我。这他妈的算什么事？）
----October 14th, 2018
10-13-2018 This morning's mountain man has enabled a Chinese actress to have a "same size marriage" to the richest Malaysia man
This morning's mountain man's story can be very scary if his wife is a 1980PRC style talker.
That mountain man Ford, according to rumors, has once dated a Chinese actress Hu, Jing（演员胡静) for a couple of weeks (even that is "only") is possibly the reason why Hujing(胡静) is the so jealous voice against who he is to all these Chinese rumors or speculations as you heard this morning. Hujing's（胡静) weird understanding that a richest Mr. Rockefeller's underwear payment for a couple of nights can eligible a female to be a Mrs. Ford to a richest Mr. Ford with the understanding of "she is the same rich", is possibly from her own experience of "not married into rich" to a Malaysia richest guy according to rumors.
As Ford's houses keep announcing I have nothing to do with them, it should be my pleasure to imagine how the major Ford Houses would be like currently if they read my blog. Well, Fords are all so happy to listen to a Rockefeller's woman's underwear power because of the huge rich Rockefeller wallet all these time when I have been the victim, well, this is all Fords' good fortune turn to know how rich a Rockefeller's underwear payment can be. This entire time, some Fords' wives have been in the producing efforts to practice their underwear power as well, just not so powerful.
----October 13th, 2018
就是今天早上播出的那个山上男人让演员胡静可以同等财富规模“平嫁”了她的马拉西亚特级富豪丈夫
那个山上的男人福特据说以前和中国大陆的电影演员胡静谈过恋爱（虽然"就只有"一两个星期），但胡静就是听不得华人圈里对这个山上的男人福特究竟是谁的种种传闻，据说闹吃醋闹得很凶， 今天早上就是她。特级富裕的一个洛克菲勒豪迈付给女人的裤裆钱（虽然“就只”一两次裤裆关系），居然可以让一个什么都不是的女人可以风光嫁给最富的那一个福特当上个福特夫人还居然“不是嫁入了豪门”，胡静的这种理解，据说是因为她自己的亲身经历，据说胡静自己就是因为和这个山上的福特睡了一两个星期（虽然"就只有"一两个星期），据说拿到的钱就可以让她风风光光的以同等财富规模之资格“平嫁”给了她那个据说还是马拉西亚特级首富的特级富豪丈夫。
福特家整天宣布我是和他们一点关系都没有的，所以我是非常“幸灾乐祸”的快乐想象这几个最大的福特家里要是读到我的博客会是什么样的震撼，什么样的难以言喻之心情。我可是心情舒坦的多了，当那些洛克菲勒家的女人豪气冲天就凭着洛克菲勒有个超级特大的钱包，让我成为他们“裤裆能力就是商业政治运作管理的能力”的受害者时，福特家里可是各个笑得开心呢，今天总算轮到我笑得咯咯了。这可是所有的福特们最大的福气可以领教一下洛克菲勒家里给出来的裤裆钱有多丰厚了。据说福特家有几个女人一直也都在参与广播剧的制作以施展“裤裆能力就是商业政治运作管理的能力”，就是没那么实力雄厚。
----2018年10月13日
10-12-2018 Spoiled females
1: If I heard of a spoiled wife story as this moring's broadcasting story, will I feel bad for the husband?
Will I welcome the father's adult children heartily? Of course, same heartily.
----October 12th, 2018
2: Will I refuse to bow to a spoiled wife if I want to be a friend to the husband?
Well, as a friend, I do have the option to choose to stay clear from a friend's marriage or his family but stay in touch with the friend.
If the husband's not willing to let me have that option, what will I do? I would definitely choose to live my life the way I myself prefer. So, I certainly would just move on and move out of this friend's radar completely.
----October 12th, 2018
3: Somehow, I have been expected to be a spoiling figure to my classmates' children.
I can imagine it will be if I can spoil their financial fantasy better than their parents. Well, my children are much younger than all my classmates', and I am not the one learned to be a parent figure by raising my children.
So, even if I am getting along with some of them or all of them, and willing to listen and satisfy their girly or boyishly wild wishes if I can, I won't be the spoiling aunt to them. I am too girly is a true statement that I most likely would be very impressively as if the same generation girly with them.
My Trusts' business investment already have contributed to the charity-related professionally, my donation shares are in there as well. So, once I can regularly receive my monthly daily-living providing, I have considered using 5% (hard bar) of it to privately gift my own friends and my relatives, not the general public, not as if I owe. I myself will be the contact person and I will let everybody know how to contact me once I have the regular monthly providing.
----October 12th, 2018
10-11-2018 About rumored $500,000 daily spending on me && 为什么是我一个人的钱？
I heard rumor for some time that some R's women so angry that why this Mr. R willing to spend such a big amount on me daily, no matter how I disappreciate this name on my web blog.
Well, first of all, this rumored $500,000 dollars a day spending is the donation to some special program that needs funding support, my name has been associated with this daily donation has been because the donator has been so pissed off about why his name can't get rid of stories with my name in it. So, he donates this $500,000 daily to support that special program with a condition that whoever sees this donation needs to know that I have nothing to do with his family name as well. So, I express myself to that special program's supervision group that I won't complain about truth been told, but no matter how everyone cares about that special program, I can't be a victim of any sort of harassment because of this donation associated.
Also, I heard rumors that the Mr. Senior R has been the subject being complained about for his overspending and so unnecessary spending by his relatives. I heard it is out of the efforts to take some from that donated money and transfer some into their own names. Well, it is purely their family matters that I have nothing do with, I just can't be a victim of harassment as if I am the recipient of that donation.
Another rumor I heard, every David R has heard a rumor that himself is the person who has been spending my $500,000 daily. Well, if together with that rumor of spending $500, 000 daily on me would make this a mutual same-amount spending rumor that nobody needs to do anything about other than being pissed off, right? but why? So, I assumed the "customary" 20% buyer-back 回扣(pron: huikou) related to my $500,000 daily spending rumor is what I should have the panic about where this money would come from?
----October 11th, 2018
我也是经常抱怨不知哪儿冒出来的人不准我花钱，现在好多了。听听都是些什么原因：
1：我有钱可以花了，那他们的钱在那里。他们不是在问我要我的钱，他们是在问我他们自己的钱在那里。还连哭带喊得。
我是经常被气到半死。我根本就不认识他们，也从未听说过他们，更没见过他们的钱，他们根本是在一口一声说我偷了他们的钱。我有时气急了就会回答说“一定是藏在你自己的肛门里被你自己给忘记了。那可都是黄金万两。”
2：“你凭什么说那是你的钱”？以及“你凭什么说那是你一个人的钱？”
2-1： 这句话冷静点的问法就是“为什说那是你的钱？”“为什么那是你一个人的钱而不是方家后人公共的钱？”，确实是所有方家后人一定会问的问题。
我所继承的都是信托都是按照遗嘱继承，我在遗嘱上的名字是“女掌”。每一份都按遗嘱，每一个遗嘱都附有掌纹胎记的画像。信托究竟如何规定的确实不是由我决定的，而是在信托设立时就已经书写立在了遗嘱里的。方家后人如有问题，请就继承法和信托法向你自己的律师咨询。
信托继承和一般遗嘱继承的区别就是这些所继承钱财都是早就已经不在那个已经去世的给钱的家里老人的名下，而是这个家里老人在去世前办理了该信托后就已经转入了老人所指定的该信托唯一受益人“女掌”的名下。在我2004年继承后就转入我户籍注册名字"方敏"的名下，每一笔信托都是如此，所以所有这些信托都不是方家后人共同的钱财而是我方敏一个人的。
*女掌是我爷爷们给我起的名字（信托注册名），方敏是我父亲方文海给我起的名字（户籍注册名）。----2018年10月12日更新。
----2018年10月11日。
2-2： 我所继承的不是“芝麻芝麻开开门”，不是什么海盗藏在某个山洞里的金银珠宝在2004年被发现了我连腰都不弯一下就捡到的钱，而是一直都有人在管理的家里已经去世的老人特意留给我的礼物钱， 从来不是什么不知是谁丢在荒地上的钱袋子被发现了所以只要听说了有钱就都应该分一份的。
这些钱更不是美国有钱男人给的性交费，所以不是什么比比谁才是该男人如今最爱就应该够资格拿走的。
2-3： 我曾祖母是自1930年开始就已经寡居，她寡居期间的私人恋爱生活传言是否真实都是与我无关。
听说我爷爷方智仁去世前已经被告知一些传言，在DNA鉴定不普及的1965年，我爷爷方智仁已经就他所听到的传言做了恰当处理。所有一切都与我及方智仁给我的信托无关。
1989年时是否是灵异，即是否是已去世的方智仁在表达对他自己亲生孩子婚姻的担心，我不清楚。我知我父亲兄弟二人的婚姻因为稳定都未被提及，但他好像很关心我是否知道他也有给我一份丰厚的礼物（就是在中国香港投资的那个信托，其他的当时说的是“世界各地”）。
我所有爷爷奶奶的私人生活都与我本人及我继承的信托没有任何关系。
----2018年10月11日。
10-09-2018 Decoding references
1: What is city-watch? Citywatch is the crime-alerting program conducted through high-tech cameras to keep an eye on all streets located in Massachusetts for any given seconds. Citywatch people are police officers who sit in front of tons of same-time camera images of the Massachusetts streets.
(should be similar to this link: http://www.aberdeen.sd.us/437/CityWatch)
2: My inheriting day was June 30th of 2004. I became a resident of Boston, Massachusetts since August of 2004. My appearance has impacted a lot because of glasshouse cancer treatment but in process of recovering.
3: My Trust-inheriting is a private matter and lawfully valid is the reason that I have been provided for lawfully, I have not received providing to cover my daily living expenses is because of some confusions regarding my Trusts' business investment.
4: Any confusion regarding the ownership of the paying-company is the matter of laws but not the matter of explaining laws.
5: All the confusions regarding the ownership of the paying company are, actually, not from any of Rockefellers except some wives because of their maiden name, nor any of Fords except some wives because of their maiden name, and nor any of Walden except some wives because of their maiden name. But, one can imagine the husbands must be confused as well with their wives.
The frustration, how to let the younger generation of that three big names to know that no matter how many angry voices are around them, the paying company ownership confusion should not be their headache nor panic because all these confusion are their in-laws' maiden family's confusion.
So, I still need to wait a bit till some confusion clarified to receive my daily living expenses provided.
----October 9th, 2018
还有：
爸爸妈妈：如果有人建议你留下字条留下身边的钱给你所在乎的某某人然后悄悄搬家，就赶紧报警或者和我联系，并要特别注意交通安全，家里安全等等。请注意保护好自己。
我的电邮：somebodyinMA@gmail.com
我住家附近警局电话：(617) 343-4633 （把我的博客地址给他们， 我的住址：BHA 2494）
我住家附近警局的地址：1 Schroeder Plz, Boston, MA 02120.
据说加州洛杉矶及旧金山老华侨参与广播剧制作的人很多，像现在这种“只要没有人承认认识你，也没人承认知道你做过什么，你就没有了任何身份证明你是谁”就明显带有1850年左右旧金山大火后华人所经历的那份惊恐无奈痕迹，
还有，据说旧金山70年代四五百人失踪故事的受害人及造事者家属都有多人参与广播剧制作，“把钱放在桌上，话就是要讲清楚才行（而不是依照法律解决钱财纠纷）”，就是旧金山那四五百人失踪前的争执。当时据说是房东把房客的一封律师通知继承信托的邮件给扣下了然后坚持要分多少钱。据说这个广播剧的华人导演就是当时这个旧金山事件的导演者的家人。是真是假，反正小心就是。据说旧金山那些人就是给家人留一个纸条及身边所带的一点钱就这么从此失踪了，特别吓人。
----2018年10月9日。
10-08-2018 公开场合与私下场合的态度立场一定会是一致的
有人会问中国政府是否会在私下，通过民间对我作为真实的唐太宗李世民的继承人表达友善？
我的回应；我不会相信这种猜测也不会接受这种表达，我方敏不认为让民间人士违反中国政府三令五申的立场对我表达友善是明智之举。
很简单的原因就是我方敏从未反对中国共产党对中国960万平方公里土地的统治权，我方敏也从未反对中国中央政府建设法治国家的立场和努力。我方敏更从未对中国中央及地方政府的对内对外政策评头论足。
我方敏本人也没有意愿利用在国外生活的条件从事任何间谍活动，我方敏很感激各国人民对我所继承的这些信托在各国所投资的企业所付出的所有勤奋工作，我方敏没有任何意愿伤害我方敏所选择生活安家的国家以及那些为我所继承的信托所投资的企业而勤奋工作的各国人民。
不管中国政府和我之间的矛盾究竟是什么，公开场合与私下场合的态度立场是一致。
就中国中央政府对于我方敏在美国生活20多年后居然有可能不做任何努力就可以远程干扰多名中国公民在中国土地上的婚姻恋爱自由的指责，我方敏认为存粹是出于荷尔蒙失调造成的严重花痴型性迫害幻想症。
----2018年10月8日
有中国国内人士认为我在2004年适合一些外国名人的谈话有些矫情。
我的回应：我当时已经在国外生活多年，我的谈笑尺度在国外属于社交合适范围之内。至于是否矫情，国内人士应该最清楚作为唐太宗李世民的继承人，只要是真实，对海内外华裔社区来说，谈不上是在矫情。对外族裔人士来说，就是只要我所宣布的所继承财产规模是真实的，也是谈不上是在矫情。至于和外国皇室成员的玩笑，在我既是中国皇室继承人又有丰厚财产头衔继承都是真实的情况下，也是谈不上是在矫情。也就是说说笑笑，聊完走人。
----2018年10月8日
南京有个南京汽车制造厂，上海有个飞机制造厂，所以这两地人士最清楚我不可能有小孩。
我的回应：我还是从南京汽车制造厂的“子弟中学”南京第四中学初中毕业的，可以想象究竟有多少中国人特别知道我的底细。
我再加上几条，我是曾今在纽约曼哈顿中城生活和福特家经常共用一条街边人行道，如今是在福特家投资重镇的麻州波士顿生活。开个玩笑的说法是，从波城的中国城一直到波城的大图书馆以及我现在住的房子还有我现在读MBA的学生贷款，都是和福特家的名字连在一起。海外华人当中知道这些的人太多啦。
我方敏有自己家亲生爷爷的撑腰的好处就是隔空吵起架来，你就能听到一片类似的回应：方敏现在住的这房子的房基地是方敏自己所继承的信托所投资的企业所拥有的。这是从2004年就一直如此的。
至于是否和福特家有孩子，不管是真是假，都是双方在慎重。我选择回应“不是太清楚”。
10-07-2018 Possible reason why my both parents need to be ousted by death-certificates?
There is a lot of questions that I have why my parents both need to be death-certificates ousted from their own home, I have this hold-on hope for them to be still alive based on the arrangements I made for them. Now I got one explanation for that, without a DNA test, they just can't enjoy the retirement plan and healthcare I bought for them and paid in full on July 1st of 2004. So, it can be so convenient for someone else can put in some efforts to enjoy what I bought for my birth and lawful parents. Now, a lot would say no wonder there are so many confusion broadcasted on a radio if my parents are still alive and if all these people introduced are my parents that make so many people wonder what all these are about. A lot would ask if this is legally protected by freedom of speech? According to the definition of "bilking" as listed below, this is never a freedom of speech in English language understanding, but a criminal intention.
Bilking:
How about all these who is the man possibly fathers my children? I am still wondering about this, other than those skin care and expensive cotton-made fashions I bought for my biological children, I don't know anything yet. Fashionable only in cotton-made is not easy to achieve is the reason why it is very expensive. Luckily, it was emphasized on July 1st of 2004 that the biological origin is the only decisive factor for receiving what I have bought for my biological parents or my biological children, not the names-in-use nor birthdates, etc, as the responses to some substituting efforts on July 1st of 2004 already when "as long as that's the same name" or "as long as that is a child from the same male" was yelled by some Chinese. Bilking in Chinese means: 招摇撞骗，讹诈欺诈钱财等等。
Some would ask if there is anyone broadcasted is actually your birth mother or birthfather? Out of curiosity, a lot of people from the Chinese community already checked a lot out. I just hope my parents can read my blog to know how to protect themselves. So, if someone knows somebody has this possibly authentic contact information of my parents, how to proceed to help me to get in touch with my parents to be safe and comfortable to all parties? In the United States, a police officer from a police precinct that can be reached by a precinct phone call instead of a 911 call is the most appropriate person to verify the information on behave of all concerned parties, not a private attorney nor a private detective but a police officer. I hope either my parents can be helped this way to have my contact information or vise visa. A legal purpose DNA test in the United States only cost about $200-$300 which I can afford to conduct with my current financial situation.
Some would ask, why my entire address book need to be torn up completely? I figured, to snug in destroyer's own friends to demand money is, at least, one of the purposes so that I have to pay to have someone to talk to, and all I could possibly get should be the cold harsh hateful feelings because they are the so this charactered people who never enjoy my accompany as well as never appreciate who I am. So, I ask innocent people to be aware of this situation till law's protection against this kind efforts becomes obvious.
Some Chinese angry on why I insist on to be the heir to ancient Chinese Emperor 唐太宗李世民 if my inheriting is Trust-inherited. My inheriting is Trust-inheriting because the settler grandfather passed away years before I was born so that all these gifts were no longer owned by their own names for me to inherit directly as a family-inheriting, but transferred to the Trusts which I am a specified sole beneficiary of for Trust-inheriting. The reason I am the heir to ancient Chinese Emperor 唐太宗李世民 is that my family's heir-rule is palm-birthmarks. Ancient Chinese Emperor 唐太宗李世民 is famous for his palm-birthmarks' Crown-inheriting.
爸爸妈妈：如果需要，你们可以打电话给你们附近的警察局(不是911电话，而是拨打警察局的联络电话），要求警察帮你们核实我方敏是否是你们的女儿。只要给警察这个网址就可以，你们那里的警察是可以联系麻州或者波士顿警察进行核实的。如果爸爸还在中国，用电邮直接和我取得联系最方便。我的电邮地址：somebodyinMA@gmail.com。
----October 7th, 2018
10-06-2018 How can someone get money from a no-owner Trust ---- What is the secret?
After my post yesterday, it seems sinks in a lot of people that no matter how they tell deserved stories on a public media radio, it is unlikely they can get any money other than the paid-out expenses, but there is one stray still strong waiting for my "death" ---- somehow related to government employees, not just China.
It has been rumored in the Chinese community my "death" was announced on the radio as one of the six people. I am not a bit concerned because of my family stories how my grandparents and my great grandfather died because of hospital-related experiences, my current situation is the safest one thanks to the modern remote accessible medical technology that makes check-in in-person not even needed.
A lot of people feel my current situation has been a set up, called "you can do nothing about the situation", such as I can't contact anyone because radio program already announced no-need loudly, whoever I contact keep ignore me because radio program already explained to everyone it is so annoying, I just can't get any paid-out money no matter how much money has announced by the radio program, it seems a lot of people circling to wait for my "death". How can anyone get money if my Trust becomes no-owner? And who can get this money?
I contribute here what I have heard of. A Shanghai Miss Yu who died in the 1970s in Shanghai, her Trust was set up in Hong Kong in 1946, her relatives from Northern China got some money after her death but not the next-Kin inheriting. I heard another story recently, a guy came from Shanghai who also never married and no child had died also in the 1970s in San Francisco, his Trust was also set up before 1949 in Hong Kong and also no Next-Kin inheriting but some distributing of the money from his Trust as well after his death.
What is the trick? As I said, who is circulating around waiting for my "death" to get what money? I will be lucky if this is purely my over-suspicious of everything. So far, I heard loudly noise from Chinese community is for the one that was set up in Hong Kong in 1948, the Chinese community is certain this one is real because my family old saying they may have heard of, but what are the secrets they can have this money? According to rumors, it was Albert Gore who announced his wish to "say death" on the radio, it was Albert Gore's Chinese girlfriend announced her determination to "own" the 2004's $500Million transferred out to the U.S. from this Trust in Hong Kong. According to rumors, it took some law licenses to help to transfer the intellectual income without the income-maker even heard of such income and the trick knowledge is that the income-maker did not receive the one-and-only notification letter to expect such upcoming income-checks, so, what will be the trick for this announced determination? I am currently completely secluded from all verifiable contacts by all these efforts organized by Albert Gore and his Chinese girlfriend. Exactly, what will be the strike?
爸爸妈妈，不用担心，我很安全。请保护好自己。当年（1970年代）旧金山据说有四五百华人从此失踪，故事很吓人的。
----October 6th, 2018
10-05-2018 More about my younger brother (更多和我弟弟相关的）
Some questions I heard of regarding my other day's post about my younger brother.
( 10-03-2018 My younger brother is never a beneficiary nor the next kin to any of my Trusts（对我的任何一个信托来说，我弟弟既不是其法定受益人也不是其法定继承亲属）)
1: What if he really can't have a child of his own? (如果他真是已经不可能有他自己的孩子？）
My response: What I heard is either his wife or his wife's friend(s) may have harmed his male function that he may never have a child of his own if his wife's child is truly not his biologically. I have to ask everyone who has this question "What is your advice?"
2: Why not let him live with his wife as he chooses.
My response: Even without this rumor, I did not object his free will in living his marriage life as he prefers. I only stated I do not have any association with his marriage family, that's it.
3: Why not give him that gift of ￥500Million RMB.
My response: I refuse to reward him for not taking our parents as his relatives.
4: Why not move on when everyone insists on your parents died already, why not instead to cherish the only living brother?
My response: I moved on already so that I don't have such a living person need to be contacted or associated as a younger brother.
I am still caring whereabouts of my own possibly still living parents who have brought me up. They are mine to care for. Its none of anyone else's business how I care about them.
5: My younger brother was not brought up as a favorable child.
My response: Every family has a favorable child more or less. My parents had not abused him. I might have been spoiled financially by my ancient grandfathers' blessing somehow without my own parents' knowledge, which had also been beneficial to his grown-up experience compare to children in our neighborhood.
6: Why I was not "imported" to the U.S. if I am truly the sole beneficiary of big wealth and couldn't receive money in China?
My response: Well, I have not received my living expenses provided for four years now because of the confusion regarding the lawful ownership of my Trusts' investments which is after my lawful inheriting. I can imagine the confusion and I can imagine the obstacles and concerns if "importing" could be beneficiary to my overall well-being.
I myself have no grudge against my happy childhood grown-up experiences in not so rich China, and I am happy I was brought up by great Chinese culture that I am so proud to possess. My proud statement: I am truly the proud creator of the 2008 Beijing Olympic Game opening Ceremony.
7: Do I have any advice on how to help my younger brother?
My response: Hardly( please check the link above).
I think he can be helped to realize I truly not steal his lawful inheritable if China is indeed a lawful country.
I can't state anything on my parents behave but my parents' horrible experiences are the reasons I refuse to have any association with his marriage family, it is for my own safety and for my own well-being.
----October 5th, 2018
1: 如果他真是已经不可能有他自己的孩子？
我的回应：我听说的是他自己的妻子或者他自己妻子的朋友们把他的男性功能给弄伤了，也就是说如果他妻子的孩子真的不是他自己的亲生孩子，他可能就再也不可能有他自己的小孩了。我就只好问一下所有关心他的人“你们的建议是什么呀？”
2: 为什么不可以让他按照他自己的意愿选择和他的妻子继续他们的婚姻？
我的回应：就算没有这个传言，我都从未没有反对他按照他自己的自由意愿选择他自己的婚姻生活。我只是强调我不愿意和他的婚姻家庭有任何关联（关系），就这样。
3: 为什么不把那5亿人民币的礼物给他？
我的回应：我拒绝奖励他不把我及他的父母当成他自己的亲人。
10-05-2018 The trick
In 2004, I was famous for a video clip of dancing in a shower that was taken in 1989 when I was a college student. The setting needs to be a thin molded glass panel and a cold-water shower, the camera has to be outside molded glass to make a stretch drawing effect.
The trick is "the body is not familiar with a coldwater's touch"
My advice: take a full shower if intend to have a collection in one shot, and a hot water shower till body warm up once finish shooting.
----October 4th, 2018
10-03-2018 My younger brother is never a beneficiary nor the next kin to any of my Trusts（对我的任何一个信托来说，我弟弟既不是其法定受益人也不是其法定继承亲属）
About my younger brother and his marriage. I grew up with him, and I know him to a certain extent. I have complained that he often took whoever as his true boss but shit my parents and me before 2004, it has become as if granted that ever since the rumor since 2004 about his possible sexual relationship with my mother's eldest sister(deceased) who was 10 years older than my mother.（关于我弟弟和他的婚姻。我是和他一起长大的，所以对他有一定的了解。在2004年之前就抱怨过他总是把所有人都当成是他自己的主子，但总是吧我和我父母当成是他的奴才。自从2004年有关他和比我妈妈大了10岁的我妈妈的大姐有可能有性关系的传闻后，这些就似乎成了天经地义。）
When there were some offices in China that rumored set up by this or that person associated with me, a lot of complaints were about how one can be belittled if the one is my associated or my parents' associated anybody. From this moring's broadcasted efforts from the Chinese government to replace me with his wife who mother another man's child, this obviously echo a lot of speculated rumor worldwide hat if I indeed have inherited some Trusts, the Chinese government shit me such publicly on the public media is to rule all those investments in the United States. I have to make my statement here that I am the sole beneficiary person of the Trusts I inherited according to each settler's will, and I have nothing to do with any business investing activities that any of my Trusts have been conducting. I am agreeing it is the lawful rights to whoever refuses to be stepped all over by whoever, in my younger brother's name or in those names related to my younger brother's marriage, to express this refusal as long as local law permit and as strong as local laws permit.（前几年的时候听说中国有一些办公室是这个那个和我有各种传言的人开设的，当时普遍的抱怨就是只要任何人说是那个办公室的或者和我及我的父母是有工作关系的，就统统都成了我弟弟的孙子辈。今天早上的广播更是很明显的是要用他那个传说中已经替一个北京男人生了一个孩子的老婆来取代我的地位。这也印证了世界各地的坊间一直都有的传言，也就是中国政府编造所有这些故事在广播剧上公开播出以公开痛骂我方敏的原因就是要借此霸占我方敏的财产或者至少是可以任意对着我方敏的信托在美国的投资指手画脚的并任意花费的。所以我就说只好在此公开声明：我是我所继承的所有每一个信托的唯一受益人，我和我所继承的所有每一家信托的任何投资经营活动都从来没有任何关系。我同意任何人只要不乐意被人践踏都有法律权力表达拒绝被践踏的意愿，我同意为实现不愿被践踏的目的所采取的表达方式及激烈程度就只要是在当地法律所许可的范围内以不违反当地法律就可以。）
My parents' miserable stories have already been teaching materials to whoever doubts if politeness or endurance can ease the matter. Both of my parents were evicted from their own-bought apartment by a death certificate which means permanently without a roof nor any financial support from the pension or any saving till I heard any news and till I can find my parents, all because of my younger brother's wife's desire to own that apartment, and it is rumored that is the same reason I was only allowed to hear my father's "death in October of 2013" till the apartment was legally transferred to my younger brother's name when I called my younger brother in early 2015. I have heard tons of fights between my parents and my younger brother's marriage about who should own that apartment in its legal registry ever since she married my younger brother. I am currently holding my hope that my parents still alive because I have entrusted my caring for them, and you must have heard all those curses broadcasted from China as well as its government how daring to hope my parents can still be alive. How could I possibly withhold my searings about the Chinese government when it is the government officials who completely ignore my senior parents' tears and the fact my parents should be the same equal Chinese citizens in front of laws?（如果有人认为容让和谦和是可以缓解这份被践踏的压力的，那我亲生父母的悲惨遭遇就已经是这些人所应借鉴的。传言因为我弟弟的老婆希望这房子转到他们夫妻的名字下面可以让她当老婆的有一份安全感，所以我父母两人都是被一纸死亡证给逐出了我父母用自己工资买的那套房子， 也就是说从那时起就可能永远就没有了一个栖身之所，也从此没有了退休金及点滴存款可以买口饭吃，除非我能及时找到他们。而我是在那房子已经转入我弟弟名下之后才于2015年我自己打电话给我弟弟才被允许听说了我父亲“2013年10月已经去世”的消息。自从我弟弟结婚，我就已经听说了我父母和我弟弟夫妻为这房产证应该在谁名下的争执。我现在还在心存希望我父母还在，就因为我办理信托时也一并托付了对他们的照顾，你们也一定听到了广播剧上来自中国以及中国政府的诅咒“居然还敢幻想你父母还活着？”我那有可能不痛骂这一届的中国政府作为所谓的政府职能机构，却居然完全不在乎我父母“死前”都是在中国法律面前平等的中国公民，作为政府机构却居然完全不在乎我父母作为中国公民时流下的眼泪。）
My younger brother may understand his current situation is the price he needs to pay to get to me as well as the wealth. But, I excluded next kin inheriting entirely and he is never a beneficiary by will to any of the Trust I inherited. Also, he is not the person has the capability to help himself to change his current situation if he has any money at all. According to rumors I hear, his current situation is pretty much a publicly humiliated beggar to live one his wife's charity but pay his own money to raise his wife's own child. I currently hold my gift to him, originally sized ￥500Million(exchange rate $1= ￥6-ish), because that may endanger me and possibly my alive parents. And the official reason for this withholding that I listed on my web blog is he is not eligible to the gifting because that is the gift of appreciation to my relatives who have treated me or my father as a relative.（我弟弟有可能是认为他现在的处境是在卧薪尝胆才能有一天可以拿到我所继承的财产。但是，我弟弟从来不是我的所继承任何一家信托按照遗嘱所指定的受益人，我本人也彻底拒绝了我的任何亲属作为我财产的继承人。而他本人就算有钱也不是有能力可依靠自己改善他目前生活状态的人。依据我所听到的传言，他目前的生活状态也就是被公开羞辱是靠他老婆苟且偷生而已但必须花钱养着他老婆和别的男人所生的孩子。我目前是决定扣留我准备送他的原定5亿人民币的礼物（外汇比：1美金=6元多人名币）就是因为给他这钱根本就是给我自己和我父母增加人身安全的危险。我博客上的正式理由就是我的这份礼物是送给把我或者我的父亲当作自己亲人的那些亲眷的以表达感谢的。）
According to rumor, I have been harassed and threatened so much by him and his marriage associated already. According to rumors, my younger brother's wife mothers a child from a Beijing man whose wife mothers four children. According to rumors, one of these four children is from a 2004's military guy Liu, Yuan(刘源) or one of this Liu, Yuan's relatives. Also, this Liu, Yuan has an actress wife who has a director lover and relatives work for the Chinese consulate Chicagoago, etc. All participated in this radio program's public blackmails regarding who I am, I assumed the purpose is to take over the wealth I inherited as you have heard this morning.（根据传言，我已经被他本人一及他的婚姻亲朋骚扰的很离谱了。根据传言，我弟弟的老婆的孩子亲爹是个北京男人，这个北京男人的老婆有四个孩子，其中的一个是2004年传说中的那个名人后裔的军人刘源的或其亲属的孩子。而这个军人刘源，有个当演员的妻子和一个做导演的男人是情侣，这个演员妻子的娘家亲戚还是芝加哥中领馆的。都和这个广播剧的编造制作并公开播出对我方敏的羞辱谩骂有关，我估计就是为了抢夺我所继承的财产吧。）
So, I have to restate here that（所以我再次宣布我的声明：）
I excluded next kin inheriting entirely and my younger brother is never a beneficiary by will to any of the Trust I inherited.（我弟弟从来不是我的所继承任何一家信托按照遗嘱所指定的受益人，我本人也彻底拒绝了我的任何亲属作为我财产的继承人。）
I am the sole beneficiary person of the Trusts I inherited according to each settler's will, and I have nothing to do with any business investing activities that any of my Trusts have been conducting.（我是我所继承的所有每一个信托的唯一受益人，我和我所继承的所有每一家信托的任何投资经营活动都从来没有任何关系。）
Some said, will I be concerned after this morning's broadcasting that my wealth may be withheld to prevent my threating-ability? I say how can my wealth have any threating-ability when my Trusts only have few investments in any country that has the military & public safety which is supported by the entire country to protect anyone on the soil of the country.（有人说，今天早上的广播剧都播成这样了，你还不担心你的钱被以担心你钱太多威胁社会安全为名给扣留了？我说，在每一个有军警的国家，我的信托就只有有限的投资，而该国家的军警是由其全体人民提供的税收财务所支持的，该国家的军警也是有能力保护在其领土上的居民的。我信托的那点投资能有什么威胁？）
----October 3rd, 2018
There has been a lot of questions about, exactly why I dislike 1989 student group, why I so respect the 1921's communist party leaders, why not understand them both as young people with passion?
10-01-2018 Speaking in a totally different language (对牛弹琴)
I have this urgent pressure that I have to go to a law school because I have this horrible experience that I poured out everything I know which so acknowledged by so many people as "full of information" but responded by law representative as "no valuable information". There are so many doubts in so many people after they heard of my story that if this is a so corrupted country already, the comfort is there are also a lot of law people agree my story is so informational and so verifiable. The reason: these agreeable law people are investigators, the no-valuable-information law representatives are attorneys. So, I decided I am going to law school.
I need to learn attorneys' language to understand my representing attorneys, this is inspired by the fact I finally can speak in the language that an MBA graduated can understand. Attorneys' profession is waiting for me to provide information to answer my question, the investigators' profession specialized in finding information themselves as long as I can provide some clues. My frustration is I don't speak attorneys' language to know what information is what attorneys would expect.
I am lucky I can speak three professional languages now. Such as, my blog article about JPMChase is very understandable to a computer person by taking a look at a table published in that article, to an MBA graduated after reading my account of what happened, but remains a huge puzzle of "why the change is so phenomenal, is that a political movement?" to a lot. The new cancer technology is the same, it is so easy to a lot of medical background people by looking at the table at the bottom of that article. I kept it that way to save it to those who really would read through this article ignoring the fact I am new to English writing.
Following are some examples of speaking in a totally different language:
I keep saying I was at my green card application representing attorney's office when I attended 2004's teleconferences, and I heard later that I inherited this and that. The attorneys' common reaction is: "You don't have an inheriting by heard of it."
Attorneys kept asking me "where is your Trust registered if you did inherit a Trust, the setup date or the Trustee information, etc.". I kept on politely clarifying I don't encourage to find out where the Trust is because of too much harassment already, and I have already provided all the references I know of. Attorneys' common reaction is "I can't help you."
----October 1st, 2004
I heard the arguments in this morning's broadcasting is all about if I should have money, one group is arguing they have heard the demand from "the people", the other group is responding that law enforcing efforts concentrate on enforcing currently already existing laws. So, I figured one group must be the political group, the other group must be the government group.
Reason:
----October 1st, 2004
09-30-2018 Why a glamor talented big name's daughter-in-law kept on challenging a daughter from a completely different house?
Heard this morning's broadcasting that glamor and talented Ina has been on this radio producing efforts that I accused as blackmail. Being talented herself, why she has problems with hard-earned fame? I search online and found out her husband carries the famous family resemblance obviously. She is a wife to a big name in a happy marriage probably is the reason for all these challenges.
I am an heir-daughter of a long history name whose privileges are protected, she is a daughter-in-law to a big wealthy business name who deserves the same privileges. This longtime struggle may have been shared among a lot of daughters-in-law who mistook my privileges are from being important enough to the big names' family seniors. This is a huge misunderstanding that my "huge success" in 2004 came from the romance, July 1st of 2004 was a big day in my life because it was the next day I inherited my grandfathers' blessing. That day was the day it was all about me and all about what I wanted because that day was my inheriting shopping spray day. My hard-earned fame glory day was on June 30th of 2004 when I participated in the conversation that led to the smartphone's invention.
-
Chronicle Note
**I have not heard one single episode of this radio program myself for a lot of reasons. To do a radio program majorly featuring me was discussed on 07/01/2004 conference call. The radio program has been produced by United States 106.7FM or Clear Channel and on air since 2005??suppose??. I am a Chinese, the major featured person(suppose). Following are what I gathered from impacts of being the major featured person and may not correct. Please contact me at somebodyinMA@gmail.com if the content is seriously incorrect and please provide references including broadcasting channel and time, thanks forward.
老爸爸方文海，你其实是被我给信托了， 我所信托的财产很安全，你也很安全，请尽快和我联系，或者联系南京紫台025-8333-2227，请赶紧和美国领事馆联系(任何地方的美领馆， 上海021-8011-2400），不用担心你是否有有效证件证明身份，他们可以做DNA鉴定来确定你和我的亲生父女关系的。如果老爸爸你因为自己的亲身经历，想在国内找找妈妈王博贤的消息，也最好是在和美国领事馆核实妈妈是否已经在美国之后，或者至少和我方敏取得联系之后，再一起商量商量如何找妈妈并和妈妈取得联系。紫金山天文台http://www.pmo.cas.cn/ztjj/lxfs/
致上海公司律师：只有我亲生父亲方文海所持律师信件才有可能是有效律师信件，2004年7月1日我办理我的财产信托时就是这么要求这份差别的。已经是有了这么大的差别之后，我的八旬父亲方文海还是于2013年10月被赶出了他自己的家门。我母亲应该于2004年7月2日起应该有一份她的退休金规模的由我提供的月供，但我不知具体是如何给付的。----2018年4月13日
老爸爸：你可以用图书馆的电脑，注册一个电邮地址，只要你觉得在网上发表这个电邮地址很安全，你就可以用这个电邮地址和我联系，我可以申请让你搬来麻州波士顿(Boston) 亨廷頓大道上的(Huntington Avenue)的东北大学(North Eastern University）以及温特沃斯理工学院(Wentworth College)的附近和我同住, 再远一点就是Museum of Fine Arts, Boston( 地址：465 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115)，波士顿地铁: Orange Line (Ruggles Station),走出这个地铁站，你要么在东北大学里，要么不知该往哪走，要么你走走就已经知道我大概住哪里了，就只是哪栋楼了，我住的是公屋（BHA, 2494)。https://chroniclenote.blogspot.com/
我的电邮：somebodyinMA@gmail.com, somebodyInBoston@gmail.com
我住家附近警局电话：(617) 343-4633 （把我的博客地址给他们， 我的住址：BHA 2494）
我住家附近警局的地址：1 Schroeder Plz, Boston, MA 02120.
注册电邮地址的网站：gmail.com
12-03-2018 和华人矛盾 ---- 再谈高行健 （2）(About the Chinese French writer Gao, Xingjian)
Heard about this morning's broadcasting， I don't care about Gao, Xingjian's tears because I am possibly his victim.（听说了今天早上的播出， 我不会在乎高行健的眼泪，就因我很可能是他的一个受害者。）
1: Remember Yu's family and private assistant story? One of the fourth cousins of the private assistant was a famous actor of Bejing People's Art Theatre (北京人民艺术剧院) that Mr. Gao had worked as a scriptwriter for about 10 years(1981-1989) which was that actor Yu's prime acting time.
（1：记得于家和私人助理的故事吗？私人助理的一个四等亲堂兄就是北京人民艺术剧院的著名男演员于是之，高行健1981-1989年在北京人民艺术剧院做职业编剧期间，就是于是之当演员最红的那几年。）
I heard Bejing People's Art Theatre (北京人民艺术剧院) has been one of the major forces of this "radio program producing is the authority to evaluate to deny everyone's achievement" scheme. You all heard how Mr. Gao deny how I dare to claim I can have inherited wealth? You heard the almighty tone that how dare I say I can have intellectual incomes?
（我听说北京人民艺术剧院是这次“广播剧制作的目的就是利用表演来重新评审并否定每一个人的非演艺类的成就是否有可能真实”这么一个伎俩的核心势力之一。你们也都听到高行健的口气就是否定，就是在说我怎么敢宣称自己有继承财产？你们也都听到权威气势的语调对我竟然敢说我自己是有智慧产权收入的种种评论？）
2: Remember the argument if Mr. Gao won the Nobel literature prize fair? I remembered it was reported in the U.S. that all the pressure was on the lady evaluating committee member who recommended him.
（2：记得高行健获得2000年的诺贝尔文学奖时，对他的法文获奖作品是否是公平赢得文学奖的争议？我记得美国当时就此的报道都是提到对当时文学奖评审委员会里推荐他得奖的一个女士压力很大。）
Well, I heard, one of Mr. Gao's ex-wife who works for a French International radio station has married to one of that lady's colleague, and I heard French Chinese Community has a good level different opinions on if his article is good enough to be the award winner.
（我听说高行健的一个在法国国际广播电台工作的前妻就是再嫁给个这个女士的一个大学同事，我也听说法国的华裔社区对高行健的法文作品是否好的可以得奖持有很大的不同意见。）
My anger has been why he insults everyone who evaluated my intellectual incomes and those law peoples who publicly clarified my inheriting is lawful. Not to mention how dare he to deny in the name of "performing arts" that I am being the authentic creative scriptwriter for Beijing Olympic Opening Ceremony?
（我的愤怒就是为什么他参与公然羞辱每一个评估了我的智慧产权收入的人士以及所有公开澄清我的继承是合法继承的的美国司法界人士？更不用说他竟然敢以“表演艺术”的名义公然诋毁我是2008年北京奥运会开幕式闭幕式创意人的事实。）
3: Also, I heard another Mr. Gao's ex-wife who mothers a child from him, a retiree of the Nanjing University, was graduated from the same Nanjing University in 1962 which was the same year that "Beijing ex-girlfriend in private assistant's story" graduated.
（3：还有，我听说高行健的第一任妻子，就是从南京大学退休的他孩子妈妈，就是1962年从南京大学毕业的，那正是私人助理故事里的“北京前女友”毕业的同一年。）
----December 3rd, 2018
So, I make some announcements here to echo this morning's broadcasting:
（说了这些，下面是我对今天早上播出内容的公开回应：）
1: I don't care as well, and I agree all according to laws is good.
2: I refuse to provide for those demanded in this morning's broadcasting and in the future,
3: and I refuse those debts-paying that was demanded in this morning's broadcasting and in the future.
（1：我也不会在乎的，我同意一切法律。
2：我拒绝今天早上所播出的及今后可能的所有要求扣除我自己生活费用以支付他人生活费用的任何要求，
3：我拒绝·今天早上所播出的及今后可能的所有要求扣除我自己生活费用以代为偿还他人债务的任何要求。）
----December 3rd, 2018
12-02-2018 About Nobel Literature Prize Winner of 2000, Gao, Xingjian of 2000（有关2000年诺贝尔文学奖的获得者高行健）
你相不相信他是有才华的？(If he has talents?)
你相不相信她是有财产的？(If she has wealth?)
横批：不由你决定(Note: Not upon your authentication)
听说了今天早上播出的“外籍华裔名人都来驳斥她居然有财产的说法”，包括了旅法华人高行健及周华健等等，当然也就有些话题涉及作为诺贝尔奖金认可的法国文学作家，他是否是有些真实的才华。(Heard about this morning's broadcasting of "Prominent Chinese to joint-together to rebuke if her wealth exists", which featured a French Chinese writer Gao, Xingjian, and the talks about if he actually has some authentic talents. Mr. Gao is the winner of the Nobel Literature Award in 2000 for his work in French. )
有人问我相信他有才华吗？我先声明，我从未读过高行健的中文作品，也不懂法语，更还未到访过法国。(I was asked if I believe he is talented? I have to make it clear first that I never read his works in Chinese, nor that I understand any French, and I have not visited France yet.)
我在网上查了一下（百度百科----高行健），高行健1940年出生，父亲是个职员，母亲是个演员，1952年起就读南京大学附属金陵中学(当时是南京第十中学)。他本人很喜欢艺术，1957年考入北京外语学院法语专业，1962年毕业，作家。1970年代下乡后任职安徽的中学语文老师，1980年开始担任北京人民艺术剧院的编剧，80年代的后期（1987年）移民法国与当时已经担任法国一家国际电台主持人的妻子团聚。获2000年诺贝尔文学奖。(I checked out on the internet (Wikipedia----Gao Xingjian). In the year 1940, Mr. Gao was born into a clerk's family but his mother was an actress. He attended Nanjing Univerisity Affiliated Middle School in 1952 (was officially named Nanjing 10th Middle School at that time). Since his youth time, he enjoys arts but he chose to enter Beijing Foreign Studies University to study French and graduated in 1962, later he became a writer. In the 1970s, he was re-allocated to Anhui province to teach Chinese literature in a middle school during the 1970s "China's nationwide re-allocating movement". He became a scriptwriter for Beijing People's Art theatre since the year 1980. In 1987, he migrated to France to reunite with his wife who was already an anchor host for an International Radio Station in France at the time. He won Nobel Literature prize for his French work in the year 2000.)
首先，我认为大学阶段的教育是正式介绍一门学科的开始，很多诺贝尔奖金的获得者，都是在20岁左右才认识了某一门学科，在几十年之后因在该学科的杰出贡献而荣获诺贝尔奖金。(First of all, I think college e4ducation is the official introduction of a science. A lot of Nobel prize winners were introduced to a science in their 20s, and won their Nobel prizes years later for their hard-earned achievements in that science.)
其次，都是20多岁上大学才开始接触的这些学科，文学和科学一样，想要获得成功，都是需要付出努力，也都需要杰出的才华，但这不能说华人只有科学类的才华，只可以获得科学类的诺贝尔科学奖，就没有可能有文学类的才华以大学所学的第二语言的法文作品获得诺贝尔文学奖。(Second of all, all these Nobel prize winners were introduced in college when they were about 20 years old, literature or all kinds of sciences are all the same. It is the same to be successful in science major or in literature major, both need real hard work and real talents to have real achievements, but this is not to deny Chinese can only be talented enough in sciences category but not literature kind, nor to say it is impossible for a Chinese to be talented enough to win a Nobel prize for his French work as his second language, but his major he was introduced to since college.)
就我今天的博文标题，高行健究竟有没有法国文学的才华，我相信一定是由他法文作品的欣赏者所推崇的，除了说诺贝尔奖的评审委员是评定他诺贝尔文学奖的权威，我还真不知他是否有才华是由哪一个权威机构所认可，至于我究竟有没有继承财产，绝对是由法律所决定的。(Regarding today's title, if Mr. Gao is talented or not in French Literature, I think it must be from his fans favoritism, but other than Nobel literature prize's committee is the authority to authenticate his Nobel literature prize, I really don't know who or where is the authority to authenticate if he has talents. But if I have any inherited wealth, it is absolutely authenticated only by LAWS.)
----2018年12月2日。
12-01-2018 All about Shanghai and Medical College （上海医科大学的毕业论文怎么回事？）
Heard about this morning's broadcasting.
About Shanghai Medical University I graduated from in 1990
My response: This Medical University I graduated from is now Shanghai Medical College of the Fudan University, which also has a law school and business school.
I agree even though this is the medical college I graduated from where I received medical and pharmaceutical education, this medical college does not have the authoritative knowledge regarding if I made intellectual incomes in the U.S. nor if I have inherited some wealth.
I have some issues with some alumni of this same medical college. My anger has been why being alumni of the same medical college can be the reason for them to be the denial authority regarding if I can have intellectual incomes or inherited wealth, and why it is their business to be so angry at me if I have some "none of their business" romance money?
----Dec. 1st of 2018
About the rumor that my college diploma was revoked in 2007.
My response: This is an untrue statement.
I graduated in the year 1990.
About my final project paper was "copy all over".
My response: This is an untrue statement.
It was all academic references(similar to the APA style citation) appropriately cited according to the medical college's academic policy. My joke was saying how I didn't know how to relate the citations with my own research subject in my college's final project paper, not that I did not write anything at all of my own in my final project paper.
(所谓抄袭其实都是一些索引也就是成语引经论典里”引经"的意思，所有的索引都是依据上海医科大学的学术条例规范而引经论典的。我2004年时开玩笑讲的就是大学毕业那时的我写论文只会引经，不会论典，所以我完全不知我所引用的他人学术观点和我的毕业论文实验课题连不连的上，这并不是在说我的毕业论文里就只有引用他人文献观点而完全没有自己的东西。2004年开这个玩笑是因为当时做了电脑保全方面的研究，我已经知道了什么是论典以及如何论典了。）
About the incident of "cheating in the final exam" in the fall semester of our senior year (1990).
My response: The incident was caught by the security cameras and reported to the college principle office immediately. That was the only such incident. The final decision of "not another exam needed" was made by the medical college's academic committee and announced to us in the following spring semester. The entire class graduated in July of 1990 with diplomas.
It was rumored our class is the only class ever needed to have medicine major's Internal Medicine that has over 500 common diseases in the exam scope for each's symptoms, decisive diagnosis, pathology reasons and possible treatment method, Neurology(similar), and Psychiatry (similar) as three major final exams for Basic Medical System offered by the school of medicine, plus advanced Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacology as two pharmacy school's major final exams, and everything else, all in just one week's time. Obviously, we were pitied.
It was so dreadful to all of us when it was rumored that we may need to redo the final exam. If you heard those cries with tears from some who could only sleep for a couple of hours a day for that one hellish week, you won't do that to us. The school academic committee members are(were) all medical college graduated, either from the school of pharmacy or from the school of medicine. They knew that three Basic Medical System courses were experimentally upgraded courses for us pharmacology major students, our class was the only pharmacology class participated.
----Dec. 1st of 2018
有关我曾祖母1941年在香港替我设立的信托。
我的回应：1941年，我曾祖母当时已经守寡10年，她的三名成人子女也都已婚已育。我没听说她1941年时期的感情生活，我认为这和我曾祖母特意替我办理的信托也没有任何关系。我是2004年按照我曾祖母的遗嘱继承了该信托。
这钱一分一毫都是我曾母自己的钱，把这钱全部给我也是我曾祖母自己的意愿，我作为唯一受益人继承我曾祖母所信托的财产是按照我曾祖母自己的遗嘱，按照继承法信托法，所以不需要任何人同意或者不同意，这钱就是我方敏的合法财产。曾祖母的礼物是我方敏应该珍惜的，而不是什么我方敏有钱就应该扔掉给别人的。
----2018年12月1日。
11-30-2018 From my current schooling look back my college time
Heard about this morning's confusion about my paper's very good scores
My answer: I do have an MBA web blog as required for my class, I uploaded the PPT from the same interview but for MBA503 (Leading the Organizational Change). The paper is for the class MBA513(Leadership).
----Nov. 30th, 2018
Heard about such advise from this morning's broadcasting as
"you shouldn't apply to a school as you wish but any classroom that can provide education should be enough."
My answer: I do enjoy the freedom to choose a classroom for my education, and please mark the knowledge that tuition-payment is not your money to privilege you to have such an opionion to voice.
----Nov. 30th, 2018
My frustration:
I truly never have lived on those advisers,
I am truly not living on those advisers currently,
I truly never demanded to live on those advisers,
I truly don't need those advisers donation to have my desired education,
I truly don't know who those advisers are nor if they have any money to fancy that I would need from.
And I truly have my own good money from my own birth grandfathers, which I inherited according to each of my own birth grandfather's own will.
And I truly don't owe those advisers any financial debt.
----Min Fang, Nov 30th, 2018
The horrible:
I really don't know why those advisers are so stuck in my life, so I have called laws to help to free myself from their such unwanted and never needed to advise as you heard in this morning's broadcasting.
They are never really in my life but they are so sneak around in my life as how they let you hear their comment or their opinion about whatever I do in my own free life on a public radio as if they are a master as wish to rule. The most horrible part, they don't do just commenting on a radio but so reach-ed out decision-making about me without me even need to hear anything about. They are in my school, in my neighborhood, and in every place I have any dealing with, and they are so refuse to back off.
I heard when I was in college in Shanghai almost 30 years ago, this was how these people, rumored from the same or related group, get involved in my life: This was a group of associated people, first, identified the person who could possibly be a friend to me, then talked to that person as complete anonymous strangers but know "all my secrets for all my life to tell how evil I truly is", when that identified possible friend of mine was just walking on the streets. It of course freak that person out permanently from that moment on, and me as well after I heard about this because I know for certain they are the people I never even heard of before March of this year of 2018.
I heard this was how my father's sister(s) lost her(their) lover(s). I heard one guy was grabbed by a complete stranger from the streets to hear such secrets for how "so unworthy" my father's sister(s) "so truly deserved to be and so should be known for".
----Nov. 30th, 2018
11-29-2018 I refuse so-called "Same High School inheriting"（我拒绝所谓“同一所高中继承”的说法）
I refuse so-called "Same High School inheriting"（我拒绝所谓“同一所高中继承” 的说法）
I refuse such saying of "humiliation of the high school if not having money" （我拒绝所谓“没钱就是南师大附中耻辱”的说法）
听说了今天早上的播出内容，重点：
1：因为我方敏根本就没有钱，所以我方敏是南师大附中毕业的就是南师大附中的耻辱。如果我方敏居然有钱，那只要是南师大附中毕业的就都应该够资格继承就都应该有钱。
请问究竟是什么钱？多少钱？为什么只要我方敏居然有钱，只要是南师大附中毕业的就都够资格有钱？南师大附中的就都应该够资格有什么钱？有哪一笔钱？南师大附中的就都应该够资格有多少钱？有多少笔钱？
我方敏拒绝被一些敲诈勒索者称为是南师大附中的耻辱，我方敏拒绝任何南师大附中在校的，曾今就读过的，毕业生（除方敏外），及他们的所有相关人员继承我方敏的任何财产。我方敏拒绝任何南京师范大学及南京师范大学附属的任何机构及学校的任何人员包括在校生曾经就读过的和已经毕业的，及他们的所有相关人员继承我方敏的任何财产
据说，因为中国国家主席习近平和国家总理李克强的共同家庭成员程虹，国家总理李克强本人及中国北京中央政府其他一些工作人员据传都是南京师范大学附属小学就读过或者毕业的，所以海外一直有传言，只要程虹自己的婚姻大家庭是实质拥有并统治中国，方敏的死亡就是他们的婚姻大家庭一定可以无需方敏意愿就一定可以分享方敏财产的机会，只要方敏自己人都已经死了，还有谁在乎法律在乎方敏自己意愿？他们自己的婚姻大家庭可以完全无视中国宪法而一家实质统治中国，就是中国已经没有有效的宪法也不需要任何法律就只需要宠爱一个女人屁股的最真实有效的权威证明。
我方敏立场，只要中国还是一个人民共和国，只要中国还是由中国共产党集体领导的法治国家，我方敏的财产可以被谁继承完全由我方敏自己决定。有法律，他们就没有可能继承我方敏的任何财产；没有法律，他们这些人也就是自己被别人持刀拿枪给杀了，也就是他们这些人自己的全部钱财被别人拿走而已。他们是有警卫保镖，不用怕？我说当保镖的才是有枪有拳头有力气的，才是绝对可以保证近距离射击百发百中的，为什么真正有枪有力气有拳头的就只是拿工资分点钱而已？都已经没有法律了，谁还需要智谋对付法律干嘛？都是他们这些人自己在高调强调中国960万平方公里土地，就只需要珍惜这一个被他们这些中国的国家领导人所共同宠爱的女人屁股，既不需要法律，也不再是由中国共产党所领导统治。咱海外人士说说，只要是个男的，只要不是无能也不是性病造成性器官严重变形，谁不会操女人屁股？只要没有法律，谁还怕谁啊？只要他们这些男的都给中华人民共和国的子弹给枪毙了，死了，又有谁在乎他们所共同宠爱的老女人屁股是不是还活着，该不该过如何好的不得了，但不由他们自己的工资所提供的奢侈生活？
想试试什么是“只要没有法律”？愿意尝试签字画押不需法律保护？如果在美国，就这人口袋里的区区二十元美金就可能是这人丢了性命的原因，报纸上成天一堆类似的社区治安报道提醒民众警惕小心。没有法律保护，谁怕谁啊？有法律保护有警察巡逻，这人都会被提醒出门时口袋里一定要备点零钱防身，原因之一就是以防被人劫财不得而伤了性命不合算，其他就是以备万一要叫个出租车等等。
西部片看多了，也就知道法律治理真正就是全体人民共同的愿望。就看看那执法的和犯法的，统统都是有枪有力气有拳头的，就是这么一次次的拳脚相向，一次次的刀枪相对，先进法治国家如此建立的历史就已经充分体现了法治国家是全体人民共同的意愿。我方敏是一点都不担心“只要没有法律”这种威胁，或者“人都已经死了，谁在乎？”这种论点。一个国家是否法治是否有法律是这个国家的全体人民都在乎的。
----2018年11月29日。
2：如果我是否是中国古代皇帝的继承人是“True“，为何我是否继承财产是“Untrue”？
这也是我方敏对今天早上所播出内容的疑问，如果我继承财产是“untrue”，又如何确定我是否是古代皇帝的继承人？按照我本人说法，家族画像的电子版本（附原件的年份证明）及一些可查证的历史文件索引已经证实了我是中国古代皇帝的继承人。
我听说这是美国司法界内部的争议，原因就是我的信托登记不是公开信息可供所有人查证的。我本人立场，在我从2004年开始已经陆续收到了我的信托按时给付的一些费用的情况下，在我本人在2015年也已经通知了美国警方我有继承财产的经历情况下，我不愿意我的私人信托登记被所有人所查证，我本人认为就算不是所有人都可以查证我的信托登记，只要确定有合法的费用给付是按照2004年7月1日的会议决定而按时支付给我，非亲自查证人士对我是否继承财产至少应该是“not certain" 而不是”untrue“立场。据说持“untrue”观点的是南师大附中的毕业生，说我是古代皇帝继承人的是美国政府司法部AGO（Attorney General Office）。
----2018年11月29日。
3： 上海丁姓人士与南京
据说上海丁姓私人助理的妻子与文化大革命时期的名人王洪文夫妻两人或其中一个是同一个工厂的，很熟悉，关系一直也很好，据说现在丁家小孩和王洪文孩子的关系也很好。
上海的丁姓私人助理就是1965-1966年送我母亲的结婚礼物到南京的那个人，据说自此一直和王博真苏家隆保持了联络，据说这个丁姓私人助理的孩子和苏家隆王博真的一些朋友包括周洪良都认识。
----2018年11月29日。
11-28-2018 About my web-gifting idea
Heard this morning's broadcasting about an angry husband's blame on me.
I heard I was blamed for ridiculously announced a child for him. Well, my famous "It must be the deservedness" comment was echoing the episode that, rumored, his wife proudly produced, which featured how the husband, together with his cousins, all sharing a child each from the same woman. I was just echoing the story I heard that was broadcasted, never the authentic source for its accuracy. The husband's anger targeting me is ridiculous and absurd enough.
Gosh, the wife is talented. I heard she mimicked every single person's voice that was featured for the first almost 2/3 of this morning's episode, including my current "got a flu voice".
So, I won't be the person to worry about my web blog's public access, as announced without a "note", by the Chinese team.
----Nov. 28th, 2018
About my web-gifting idea, if it is intrusive to every warm-heart or hot-heart people's privacy if I asking too much information to gift?
I have no such intention to be intrusive. As I said, I only intend to personally gift to my friends or relatives that I do mind if gifting to someone who is negative enough or even harmful to me, and I do appreciate every warm-heart, hot-heart persons kindness to me. Everything else I don't need to know as long as it is lawful for me to gift, such as a checkbox to acknowledge "not to use for unlawful activities", or a note to myself how much is the max appropriateness for this friend for per tax year or per event, or a combined max if appropriate only for both per year and per event, etc.. I am thinking how not to be intrusive. I reject the idea to out-source the evaluation of my own appreciation or the gifting to my friends or relatives.
----Nov. 28th, 2018
Also, some said if this would encourage somebody to "violate laws on my behave" to demand gift from me?
I say this somebody would need to check if I have money for this person to demand first, and if I have money which certainly means I am protected by laws effectively to have my lawful money, well, it means I am the person will put a note on that web-gifting website to remind everyone that Laws forbid financial rewarding efforts to encourage anyone to violate laws.
Currently, the money "still in concern" if can be my money are those paid out providing that I have not received yet (such as $400Million per year), and some intellectual incomes I earned. I am obviously safe and well protected by laws. I will reject any demand for me to reward any violating laws effots.
----published on Nov. 29th, 2018
If I would ever accept the recommendation of "friends list" from somebody who publicly denounced my eligibility to be an associated to that somebody self?
I say why would this can be anybody's expectation for me? Especially those who are so denounced me because of my so not so rich childhood.
My answer for this type of curiosity is: I will do my own decision based on the list itself, my personal gifting is to my personal own friends, not whoever's personal own friend(s).
----Nov. 28th, 2018
我方敏现在是在美国有名的大学名城，麻州波士顿。很多以前在中国的认识的一些人的小孩可能也都已经到了可以出国留学的年经了，也可能会在波士顿念书。我相信他们这些做了家长的，肯定是不希望自己的孩子有任何麻烦，我本人也不认为他们的孩子远道而来就有能力帮得上我的忙，更不用提在目前的大环境下是否有意愿。我没有任何需要就我是否有合法的巨额财产而向任何人说明的地方，我有钱没钱都是一切是法律一切依据法律。
我的态度也就和二三十年前上学时一样，就只是坐在一间教室里上课而已，同学之间确实没有任何互相需要的地方，也不应该有任何利益冲突的地方，当年大学毕业因为“哪来哪去”政策连毕业分配同学之间都没有任何利益冲突。现在最多也就只是在同一个城市而已，所以我的态度也就和二三十年前上学时一样，处得来出，处不来不处。这么多年没交往，家家日子也都过的挺好。美国有法律，也就是在同一个学校上过课而已，又不是谁欠了谁的，没什么必须交往的，也不应该有什么就是不准交往的。
对这些人当中的一部分人来说，我方敏就是死绝了他们都不会在乎，有些甚至巴不得我早死早好，我还有什么方面包括有钱没钱，有孩没孩，是他们居然会如何在乎的？要是居然在乎了，又是为谁在乎，为什么原因在乎？我方敏也没有任何需要他们的地方？我方敏也永远不会在乎这些盼着我早死早好的人？
----2018年11月28日。
11-27-2018 和国内外华人华裔的矛盾
和中国政府有关对我是按照遗嘱继承信托财产而有钱“就是不同意”的矛盾。
方敏的回应：“就是不同意”没有任何可能改变任何财产的法律所有权。
没有任何人超越法律，就是很明确的说明，没有任何人只要“就是不同意”就可以任意改变财产的法律所有权。坚持以“就是不同意”作为借口想要通过劫持绑架以胁迫财产的法律拥有者改变意愿以达到改变财产法律拥有权的目的，已经构成对当事人事实上的绑架敲诈勒索。
同样，如果中华人民共和国是个宪法有效的国家，国务院总理李克强的老婆程虹就不可能是中华人民共和国事实上的总理，就没有可能因为够得着习近平的裤裆共有一个已经公开承认的30-40多岁的儿子，就成为中华人民共和国事实上的国家主席。程虹永远不可能因为是中国国家总理及中国国家主席共同的妻子就可以签发中国国家主席令或者中国国家总理令，更不可能号称因为已经是事实上的一妻多夫的私人家庭所以是事实上的实质拥有了中华人民共和国960万平方公里的统治权。
同样，如果中华人民共和国是个法治国家，按照中华人民共和国的法律，中国政府总理李克强国家主席习近平就不可能因为“就是不同意”，就任意更改中国境内的股票上市公司的法律拥有权是属于所有该公司的股票投资者的这一法律上的事实。同样道理，中国政府总理李克强国家主席习近平不可能因为“就是不同意”，就任意改变境外任何私人财产的法律所有权。
举个轻松点的例子：成语: 醍醐灌顶的新解释
中国公务员一个月工资是由中国人民缴税后由中国人民给予中国政府发放，假设是平均每月￥3500人民币。
我是美国公民，我觉得中国生活费水平每月￥1500元人民币就已经挺好，所以我说我不同意中国公务员的每月工资水平，在中国明明每月￥1500元人民币就已经够用的情况下，凭什么需要发放￥3500元的每月工资？我作为华人美国公民就是坚决不会同意!!!! 就是坚决坚决不会同意！！！！！！就是坚决坚决坚决不会同意！！！！！！！
可以想象吗：这次轮到是中国13亿人民各个都是醍醐灌顶状的伸长着脖子瞪着眼问，“你不同意！？”
当中国政府一再强调就是坚决不会同意美国的公司按其外国投资公司的指示将部分该公司经营业务的盈利作为我一个人的生活费用给付，世界各国人民及他们各自的政府就是如此的醍醐灌顶状的各个伸长着脖子瞪着眼问，“你们不同意！？”
就是这么简单，我所继承的所有信托都不是中国政府给的钱，按照我所继承的每一个信托的设立人遗嘱，也根本就没有任何其他受益人，也就是说包括了没有任何中国公民是我所继承的任何信托的其他受益人，所以不可能由中国政府不同意，更不应该由中国政府支持任何涉嫌偷窃抢劫钱财等等刑事犯罪的行为。
我方敏的智慧产权收入也是如此。阿尔贝特·高尔既不是智慧产权的评估机构发放机构，也不是美国法律的象征美国法院的裁决，更不是智慧产权的贡献者，所以不可能由阿尔贝特·高尔或者他的朋友或公司等等不同意我方敏的智慧产权收入，美国的任何民事法院也不可能在没有任何相关民事争议案件的情况下就对我方敏的智慧产权收入做出任何判决，更不应该由阿尔贝特·高尔或者他的朋友或公司等等支持任何涉嫌偷窃抢劫钱财等等刑事犯罪的行为。
----2018年11月27日。
有关“只要是方敏的钱在哪个账户里都可以自己拿都可以自己保留都应该是方敏会给的奖励金”。
方敏的回应：没有任何可能。
类似的，如果未经授权就已经擅自转移了的别人钱财，是否可以被认为是作为方敏会给予的奖励金而保留？
方敏的回应：没有任何可能。
我方敏本人不愿意花钱鼓励任何破坏任何国家法律以及任何违反任何国家法律的行为。
我方敏本人是美国公民，美国法律禁止任何美国公民花钱从事参与或鼓励任何违法活动。
如认为各国法律有不足的方面以及有需要强化可以强化的地方，我方敏本人认为应该是和各国立法机构以及执法当局联络通知立法机构执法当局予以改进，而非破坏违反当地法律。
在公共汽车上偷了钱包就翻墙蹦高钻地洞地展示灵活性，在世界各国都不可能会被当地警方认为是在训练当地的警务人员如何抓小偷以强化当地警务人员的执法能力或者锻炼当地警务人员的体能及快速应变能力。我方敏也绝不会予以奖励。
----2018年11月27日。
有人问，如果我的信托有投资规模挺大的公司，我的生活费用给付为何不是想象的可以和公司规模相匹配的那么高？
我的回应：我相信这可能是很多人的疑问，我说一下大概的计算方法：
比方说，投资的是个生意兴隆的饭店，每天结账利润丰厚。今天，结完账的老板要给孩子零花钱，如何算能给多少。
1：老板要扣除明天进货的钱，帐是明天的成本，但钱需要今天预留。
2：老板要扣除预约的明天上门清理炉头的钱，帐是这个月的成本，但钱需要今天预留。
3：老板要扣除预约的几个月以后装潢饭店门面的钱，帐是今年的成本，但一部人的钱需要今天预留。
。。。。
N：老板要扣除预定今天要给老婆（孩子妈妈）的作为家用的钱。
剩下的，老板才能考虑是不是可以以及能给孩子多少零花钱。
就这么简单。我的信托都是由专业管理人员管理，都是一切依据公司经营需要进行计算。我本人也没有意愿向公众过多汇报私人家用相关信息。我所宣布的5%礼品费用是依据目前已知的4亿美金一年的生活费用计算，共计2千万美金每年，我已经决定这2千万美金一年礼品费用是个固定数字，今后也不会因生活费用给付提高而改变。从现在起，我用每年2千万美金称呼我的礼品费用支出，不再使用5%作为称谓。按照美国法律，这两千万美金礼品费不可以作为任何人自认我应该会送礼就擅自拿取别人钱财的赔偿金（美国法律禁止任何美国公民花钱从事参与或鼓励任何违法活动）。
我收到4亿美金的生活费用就会在网上公布亲朋向我索取礼物的方式，送礼只会在我宣布之后才开始，不会预付。
----2018年11月27日。
上海，不知是否是方家方面，让我烦的不行的就是那说话的态度以及期待，怎么就认定了我会宠他们这些男男女女，不是认定我一定会宠这个女的丈夫，就是认定我一定会宠那个男的老婆，凭什么呀？把我给烦的够呛。我哪里是会宠人的人啊？我的个性从小就很自我，哪里会自我牺牲去宠别人？凭什么呀？我感觉吧，有那么一群人就是没停的，就是认定了我一定会宠，就是认定了我一定会宁愿自己死绝了都只想要让他们开心，就是认定了我就是没有自我就只在乎他们是否快乐满意，凭什么呀？听听，他们自认对我最大的威胁，就是只要不满足他们要求，他们就宣布这一辈子都不会见我。我是个女的呀，我哪来的生理需求一定要被她们那些女的见啊？就那些看着既不年轻又不英俊的老男人，我要是见到了，除了心理难以承受还能有什么呀？实在是把我给烦的不行，气得够呛。估计又是什么都已经几十岁的一群，却原来是活脱脱台湾琼瑶式爱情小说里的人物在真实生活里出现了。根本一群的老花痴，真是烦得不行。
----2018年11月27日。
11-26-2018 与南京方面的矛盾（6） ---- 和王博真苏家隆一家的矛盾
为什么王博真的亲朋好友提到了王博贤都是一副傲慢高贵的态度，他们自己都是什么人啊？
我的回答：我是听到很多人都不明白这点，王博真20岁才随解放军进驻南京，算是进了城做了城里人。王博真进城一两年后，11岁的王博贤就进了南京城，也就是说相比王博真二十多岁才当上了城里人，王博贤年纪只有11岁就已经做上了城里人在城里的小学中学念书毕业，进城时间也就差了一两年而已，怎么是王博贤反而成了乡巴佬了？世界各地包括美国真是有太多的中国大陆移民都在奇怪怎么会这样？他们自己的经历怎么都是觉得差不多时间移民的小孩子才是适应最快的移民？王博真的城里人亲朋既然很尊重王博真，怎么会把王博贤当成了乡巴佬而如此高贵傲慢？
其实很简单，主要是王博真自己把山东她父母家里她的妈妈及兄弟姐妹对我妈妈的态度又体现在了她自己家里，而且一定是体现在了所有和王博贤有关的方方面面。所有王博真的亲朋也都从心眼里认为我妈妈王博贤就是个乡下进城的下等人乡巴佬保姆，被称为了他们朋友的妹妹。我妈妈刚生下了就被自己的生母即王博真的亲生妈妈在大雪天扔出去不要了（王博真是她的第一个孩子或第一个女儿），又被我外公王怀迎从雪地里捡回来用面糊糊喂养是真实经历，所有我母亲的兄弟姊妹似乎都因此而认同我母亲是一个家里不想要应该扔出去的一个孩子，虽然血脉相同但从来不是他们的姊妹，而我外祖父王怀迎是中医郎中又经常需串乡出诊常年不在家，估计是我母亲其实一直是她自己亲生父母家里的一个下等人的原因。因我曾祖母经济条件很好，在我爷爷1948年替我办理了信托后，更是比我爷爷还好，我父亲常年随我曾祖母独立居住，对我父亲的三个弟妹而言（家里是两大人三小孩），我父亲一直都是属于家里经济条件好点的隔壁邻居（一大一小）。所以，我父亲的弟妹对我父亲也有点疏离，但因为我爷爷奶奶对我父亲的态度，他们也都认同我父亲是我爷爷奶奶的长子他们的大哥。
而我妈妈王博贤呢，一直以为王博真这个亲姐姐虽然很土很土，但她自己是个不应该这么说的一个嫡亲的妹妹，是她对于她和王淑秋（又称苏淑秋，王博真弟弟的女儿）同是11岁从同一个山东乡下来到南京为何如此巨大差别而始终不理解始终难以释怀的原因。估计我妈妈王博贤从未想过是她自己被当成了乡巴佬，我和我父亲方文海一直看得很清楚，确实也没什么需要向王博真苏家隆做解释的或者做辩护的，所以就一直只是强调别一口一声说是王博贤欠了苏家隆王博真任何抚养费用，王博贤在王博真的家里就只是个做粗活的女佣是王博真所有亲朋都已经从他们自己对王博贤的态度里已经充分表达的事实。王博贤从未欠了苏家隆王博真任何抚养费用，苏家隆王博真的亲朋并不都是我母亲王博贤的亲朋，更难说是不是我方敏作为王博贤女儿的亲朋。（如不明白我会添加注释）
----2018年11月28日。
听说就是山东的王家经常在抱怨，明明是血缘关系，为何不认亲戚？
我的回应：因为没有任何亲情，很多更是从不相识，所以不能说是亲戚，只能说是有血缘关系，我就是不认可所有对我方敏对我母亲王博贤的鄙视仇恨表达居然被说成是亲属定义。中华人民共和国法律上的五等亲并不是中华人民共和国法律上的责任义务关系而是利益冲突回避关系，美国法律也是如此。我对我母系的王家血缘关系如此理解，对我父系的方家血缘关系也是如此理解。
不是我不愿意接受血缘关系的亲情表达，我就是不认可所有对我方敏对我母亲王博贤的鄙视仇恨表达居然被说成是亲属定义亲情表达。不是我很瞧不起山东乡下的王家，何况很多当年的乡下人也都像我母亲一样已经离开乡下进城了，王博真当年唯一还留在乡下的一个弟弟，其子女也都已经全部离开了山东乡下的老家。所有王家血缘关系经过王博真的帮助进城的及到过南京的，就只有我母亲王博贤是王博真的所有亲朋都认同的乡巴佬保姆下等人，只有我母亲王博贤必须帮助干家务才可以有口饭吃。
回答：因为没有任何亲情，很多更是从不相识，所以不能说是亲戚。我方敏永远都不认为鄙视仇恨的血缘关系就是亲情，我方敏的生活里永远也不需要持这种定义的任何血缘关系。
----2018年11月28日。
A note:
It is rumored the University of Bridgeport is another authority source to deny if I was or if I could be a tech-leader in JPM Chase technology upgrading between 2004-2007. I have contacted laws about if my work experience in JPM Chase was the reason for denials to my intellectual incomes. I have confidence that professors from the University of Bridgeport I graduated from in the year 2000 are the people who understand that academic evaluation is never as simple as freedom of speech. The University of Bridgeport has a School of Business that has related laws coverage, as well as School of Engineering(Computer Science) I graduated from which are academic enough about all topics I claimed who I am. The University of Bridgeport also has, in their record, my diploma and transcripts of Shanghai Medical University I graduated from in 1990.
----Nov 28th, 2018
11-25-2018 周老师是王博真苏家隆的朋友，但从来不是我母亲我本人的朋友
今天早上所播出故事里的周老师退休前是一名中学老师，曾是我妈妈的大姐夫苏家隆当年在中学教俄语时的的学生，这个周老师的一个小孩现在是南师大附中的一个老师。这个周老师和他以前的一些同学是我姨夫苏家隆2000年去世前终生的朋友，也是我母亲大姐王博真终生的朋友。我可以在读初一时在四中住校，姨夫苏家隆和我说过他有去找过人，不知是不是这个周老师，我高一时可以住校的原因就已经肯定和他们一点关系都没有了。虽然姨父苏家隆在我读完初一的那年暑假已经领养了他自己的小孩，但对我一直态度友善，我也从未要求过被他当成家庭成员对待。
他们从来不是我母亲的朋友，和我父母也从无任何交往。但他们是从我母亲住在我母亲大姐夫妻两个人的家里时就已经认识了我母亲，很清楚我母亲只是做着一个住家女佣（是个妹妹，从农村来的，帮忙干点活，不用去理），才能挣得我母亲自己当年的衣食住行，从他们提及我母亲的一份态度就很容易看清楚这点。他们很清楚我母亲父亲结婚以后，我母亲都是和当时就已经很高工资的我父亲共同生活，不存在我母亲会抢夺王博真财产的担忧。我母亲和我提过，我母亲结婚以后有事去找周老师他们这些人帮忙，他们都是很明确的说他们是王博真的朋友，有什么事让王博真和他们谈。对这些，我没有任何反感，这也是我自己为人态度，只是强调他们和我母亲本人从来不是朋友。
周老师自已也是有好几个孩子的父亲，他应该知道做父母的心情，如果父母给一个孩子买衣服，另一个孩子如果想强，父母会帮谁。我自己就从未担心过我奶奶毛阿妹会帮她亲生的其他孩子们和我抢我爷爷方智仁特意给我的东西，更没担心过我奶奶毛阿妹会帮她的什么情人的婚生小孩和我抢我爷爷方智仁特意给我的东西。我对我所有的奶奶也都没这份担心。我自己从来没有想过需要抢夺我父母“在中国去世”留下的任何东西，我自己也从未抢夺过苏家隆王博真两人在中国去世留下的任何东西。
苏家隆王博真一直抱怨我可以经常去他们家，他们家的孩子就不能来我们家，那是因为自从他们家领养了孩子，巨大的立场态度待遇差别让我母亲难以接受她自己一直就只是他们家免费女佣而已这个事实，也就是因为苏家隆王博真一直想要对等处理，除非过年过节我也就很少去他们家里，我也很早就已经是不去也不会在乎的立场，说实话，他们家有什么吸引力，我哪里会就是一定要去？我从来没有任何责任义务必须让苏家隆王博真所领养的苏（王）淑秋的孩子到我自己家里做客，我没有这个意愿，我就是不会邀请。
王博真夫妻领养他们自己的小孩是在我初一那年的暑假，从那时起，我就是他们夫妻很确定的就只是一个亲戚，随着他们家庭感情增进，我这个亲戚也就是越来越疏离而已直至我于1996年10月离开南京离开中国常年在美国生活，不知这个周老师从何而来的这份某明奇妙的，由他们这些王博真苏家隆的朋友们出面要求我（？）出钱抚养由王博真所领养的女儿王淑秋（苏淑秋）所育的一个目前都已经22岁的成年孩子的要求？
真是莫名奇妙的无稽。我母亲王博贤的名字他们一直不认，对他们来说，哪里会认王博贤的女儿很平常很应该的，可他们怎么就认为凭他们自己的名字老脸是可以来找王博贤的小孩提要求的？真的是一点朋友情分都没有，一点交往关系都没有，这还是他们自己一直都在强调了几十年的，我哪里有可能会认他们这几张老脸说话，就冲他们的几张老脸满足他们代为提出的要求？是不是滑稽至极？我母亲王博贤很早就已经从周洪良几个人那里学会了不应该认为我方敏是可以凭王博贤女儿的身份要求周洪良那几个人帮忙任何事情，也请周洪良这几个人教育他们自己的子女别认为他们是可以凭周洪良那几个人的名字向我方敏提任何要求的。我也是不会不好意思直说他们和我从来不是朋友，意思也就是他们又算老几？他们也够资格向我提要求？我哪里是会给他们面子的人？某名奇妙！！！
不光是他们这些人，还有什么美国的英国的上流社会，通过广播剧坚决坚持一定要求我必须给他们一个面子要自愿倾家荡产，要自己自愿死绝了拉到，还要自己自愿断子绝孙，否则就不配和他们做个朋友走进上流社会，原来要求自愿失去自己的一切就只为了够资格被他们引荐可以行个屈屈礼？那我也就是全部坚决拒绝，也全部坚决报警处理了。这朋友不做也罢，我自己就已经至少是十四或者十五个皇帝的继承人，2004年6月30日那一天我就继承了一堆的封号头衔，一个皇帝爷爷至少就赏赐给了我一个头衔封号，还有丰厚礼物，再加母后娘娘的加官进爵（我都已经是皇帝爷爷的继承人了，也就母后娘娘给加个官进个爵了）。皇家送礼不都是头衔封号金银珠宝做礼物吗？凭我自己就足够高档上流了，我选择我自己和自己的孩子们活的滋滋润润的，和一些配和我做朋友的快快乐乐的谈天说地。
我方敏坚决拒绝今天早上通过广播剧向我本人提出的任何要求。
（最初版本，据说看不懂我的意思，只好改成现版本:
王博真夫妻领养他们自己的小孩是在我初一那年的暑假，从那时起，我就是他们夫妻很确定的就只是一个亲戚，随着他们家庭感情增进，我这个亲戚也就是越来越疏离而已直至我于1996年10月离开南京离开中国常年在美国生活，不知这个周老师从何而来的这份某明奇妙的，由他们这些王博真苏家隆的朋友们出面要求我（？）出钱抚养由王博真所领养的女儿王淑秋（苏淑秋）所育的一个目前都已经22岁的成年孩子的要求？真是莫名奇妙的无稽。
周老师自已也是有好几个孩子的父亲，他应该知道做父母的心情，如果父母给一个孩子买衣服，另一个孩子如果想强，父母会帮谁。我自己就从未担心过我奶奶毛阿妹会帮她亲生的其他孩子们和我抢我爷爷方智仁特意给我的东西，更没担心过我奶奶毛阿妹会帮她的什么情人的婚生小孩和我抢我爷爷方智仁特意给我的东西。我对我所有的奶奶也都没这份担心。我自己从来没有想过需要抢夺我父母“在中国去世”留下的任何东西，我自己也从未抢夺过苏家隆王博真两人在中国去世留下的任何东西。
我方敏坚决拒绝今天早上通过广播剧向我本人提出的任何要求。)
----2018年11月25日。
11-24-2018 Ridiculous confusions and "the same high school" (某明奇妙的困扰及“同一所高中的”）
A note:
I heard there is some confusion regarding who received that reallocated money from my reward's original size, I assume it was added to the total amount of the entire pre-marketing team's reward to be distributed according to pre-marketing team's own internal evaluation. This is the reason I said I reject any suggestion nor support to further re-allocate my reward if there is any confusion still existing in either research team or pre-marketing team.
I am truly very happy that I am rewarded by Viagra. I was famously almost cried publicly in 2004 because I thought "I finally got it" would mean absolutely nothing.
----Nov 24th, 2018
老爸爸：看到我现在的文风和以前不同，这只是因为记录了这一场财产保卫战对我的影响。我会好的，别担心。很惨的是， 没能让人听到roaring（狮吼），就只让人听到howling（狼嚎）。
方家小姐当厨娘
最难的时候，打动我心的就是这首诗“I am an Artist （我是艺术家）”， 我当时是在一家咖啡店里，哭的停不下来（没嚎啕）。看一下写的是不是我，我觉得每一个字都是在写我，都是在告诉我有人懂这就是我，我自己翻译的。还有， Ingonyama（狮子王）, Sapphire 是两个爷爷赏赐给我的头衔，General 就是我自己挣得了。
方家小姐做翻译 (Missy Translator)
Heard about this morning's broadcasting.
1: From Chinese in general: My wealth was originally carried out from China, so it should be Chinese money.
My answer: The same is every penny in your own wallet, which is(was) also originally carried out from China, how come you haven't beg for food even on your trip abroad? If you know for certain every penny lawfully in your own wallet is your lawful private money, you should know for certain as well that my lawful wealth is my lawful private money.
2: From biologically associated: That is originated from a grandfather's money.
My answer: If that is your grandfather, you should know it is not your money which is from his own signature. You are not born yet at that grandfather's death which already means you don't even have a name for that grandfather to give you a penny, your line's senior from that grandfather's own seed already had received the deserved share in family inheriting at that grandfather's death years ago. If you refuse to acknowledge that grandfather's own signature is the lawful presentation of his own will, how dare you claim that is a grandfather to you?
3: From some same high school graduated, the Viagra reward should not be mine because it must be some underwear routing.
My answer: No wonder you did not logic well in your college entry test over 30 years ago. It is so miraculously amazing that you can still prove it was never because of the education you received from the high school you graduated from, after all these years. The correct logic should be, it doesn't matter if it is some underwear routing or it is an academic reward, it should never be your saying. Is this logic tip help you to improve your future logic capability a little?
Further explanation: 1) My Viagra reward has been under law investigation already because I have not received it since almost 10 years ago, 2) and the evaluating pharmaceutical company already explained on a public media as well to answer the public curiosity why it was rewarded to me. So, why it is you deservedness to have an otherwise saying from your own ridiculous confusion if that is some money from an underwear routing, just because you are also graduated from the same high school but never in the pharmaceutical-related major? Is this explanation can help you to understand some common logic?
听说在美国，智慧产权收入的发放渠道是，(I heard the distribution channel in the U.S. are:)
（该药业）公司在职员工从公司领取，由（该药业）公司开具支票给付；(Employees receive paying checks signed by the rewarding company)
（该药业公司）已离退休辞职人员，以及像我这种有贡献但非（该药业）公司人员，都是从与（该药业）公司有协作关系的律师公司或者会计师公司领取，由该协作关系律师公司或者会计师公司开具支票。(Those retired or left, or associated person like me, should receive paying checks signed by the rewarding company's associated attorney firm or accounting firm.)
听说我收不到是因为该协作关系律师公司的一名工作人员（曾经在南师大或者南师大附中附小附幼就读过的或者毕业生）将药业公司所提供的奖金名单里我的名字给换成了他们自己朋友的名字开具支票。（I heard I haven't received Viagra reward is because somebody works in that rewarding company's associated attorney firm, who was also graduated from the same* high school I graduated from, has replaced my name from the reward list provided by the pharmaceutical rewarding company to sign the paying check to that person's own friend.)
*Either graduated from or had attended,
*The same High school, or its affiliated Junior high school,or affiliated kinder garden, or affiliated from: the Nanjing teacher's college.
----Nov. 24th, 2018
What the same high school means to me, at least currently?
It means if I ever dare to have a high school reunion in some property that rumored may be related to my wealth, the situation would be such that everything inside that property would start to go disappeared once guests are arriving till it only house empty walls, it property registry would have a name changed unnoticed, and its originally lawfully registered property's owner(s) associated bank accounts being deleted already before the scheduled party ending time.
This is not an exaggerating description of my anxiety, and if you ever fancy this is only a nightmare in the United States, I have to say that is only because you haven't heard those shared outcries in some other English speaking as well as some none English speaking countries: Who are these people?
You can totally hear all these from their confidence and proud about "we are from the same high school". Not a bit exaggerating.
至少是目前来说，同一所高中的对我来说意味着什么？
意味着如果我竟敢在一个传言可能和我财产有点关系的房子里来一个南师大附中同学校友聚会，场景将会是如此这般：客人陆续到来，房子里的东西就一点一点的失踪了，直到四面是墙为止，而房产证不知什么时候就已经换了一个主人了，房产证上那个原来的合法主人自己的银行账户可能在南师大附中聚会还未按计划结束之前就已经统统被取消也不存在了。
这还真不是对我现在这份惊恐地夸大描述，你要是以为这就只是在美国才有的恶梦般的惊恐，那只是因为你还没听说其他那些讲英语的或者不讲英语的国家里一些共同的干嚎：他们都是什么人啊？
所有这一切，你都可以从他们对于“来自同一所高中”所拥有的自信和骄傲里听到。一点都不夸张。
----Nov. 24th, 2018
11-23-2018 Viagra Intellectual Income ---- Why it is your anger? Why the confused money is so yours to re-route?
Recently, I heard "the government sector" is a female classmate graduated from the same major, the same medical college in the same year. I heard she had worked for the government sector briefly in the U.S., but I have no contact at all with her after our graduation in 1990.
In this morning's broadcasting, I heard she denounced every such thing she had "authorized".
I knew she had worked in pre-marketing clinic research team for a joint U.S.-Sino pharmaceutical company in China after graduation is the reason she was pissed off at how I could take "romance money" through a formal and hard-working pre-marketing team. Well, I say she does not head Viagra related any pre-marketing team is the reason she does not know that is only her own confused illusion.
My Viagra reward was not granted by its pre-marketing team nor the Viagra project, but either the R&D or the Company. Viagra reward includes its research lab's, its pre-marketing team's, me, and maybe some other related, all as parts of the Viagra reward to Viagra project & related that is granted by the R&D or the Company. Part of my original reward package granted from the R&D or the Company was re-allocated by the Viagra project management to its pre-marketing team, with the support from the R&D or the Company, without any complaint from me. But I reject any idea as well as any support to re-allocate my Viagra reward that already had the final reward decision ($5000 per month?) from the R&D or the Company years ago which was totally based on the evaluation of my contribution.
A related note: It is rumored she is also the person said I was not even graduated from her class in our medical college, which is too absurd because I stayed in that medical college as an authorized free-college-education student longer than she herself. I remembered clearly she took her train heading her home in Sichuan province at least a couple of days early than me after our graduation. I was rent free for a couple of more days than her as an authorized in-college student.
Also, my romance life never had any association with her life, in college or after our graduation. I really don't know why her confusion "if it is possible a college classmate's romance-money being intentionally routed Viagra way" can arouse her anger like such, or why it can be so hers to re-route? This is the "who the fxxx are you?" question to all those who participating these re-routing efforts because of graduated from my same college, same high school, etc.
I knew she had worked in pre-marketing clinic research team for a joint U.S.-Sino pharmaceutical company in China after graduation is the reason she was pissed off at how I could take "romance money" through a formal and hard-working pre-marketing team. Well, I say she does not head Viagra related any pre-marketing team is the reason she does not know that is only her own confused illusion.
My Viagra reward was not granted by its pre-marketing team nor the Viagra project, but either the R&D or the Company. Viagra reward includes its research lab's, its pre-marketing team's, me, and maybe some other related, all as parts of the Viagra reward to Viagra project & related that is granted by the R&D or the Company. Part of my original reward package granted from the R&D or the Company was re-allocated by the Viagra project management to its pre-marketing team, with the support from the R&D or the Company, without any complaint from me. But I reject any idea as well as any support to re-allocate my Viagra reward that already had the final reward decision ($5000 per month?) from the R&D or the Company years ago which was totally based on the evaluation of my contribution.
A related note: It is rumored she is also the person said I was not even graduated from her class in our medical college, which is too absurd because I stayed in that medical college as an authorized free-college-education student longer than she herself. I remembered clearly she took her train heading her home in Sichuan province at least a couple of days early than me after our graduation. I was rent free for a couple of more days than her as an authorized in-college student.
Also, my romance life never had any association with her life, in college or after our graduation. I really don't know why her confusion "if it is possible a college classmate's romance-money being intentionally routed Viagra way" can arouse her anger like such, or why it can be so hers to re-route? This is the "who the fxxx are you?" question to all those who participating these re-routing efforts because of graduated from my same college, same high school, etc.
----Nov. 23rd, 2018
有关参与广播剧制作是应该以每集百分比提成或者是每集固定酬谢金100美金左右。
在美国都是法律规定，不只是行规。比如，作为美国科学院的一名科学家，其工资收入是按照美国的联邦收入所得税28%-33%缴纳，而在其拿该工资在美国科学院工作期间所创造的智慧产权收入是按照联邦智慧收入税15%缴纳。这中间的区别和广播剧的百分比提成还是每集固定收入的区别是类似的。我因为完全不参与广播剧制作，所以没有固定工资收入，只有主要角色的百分比提成（15%税率），而广播剧制作组既有固定工资收入（28%-33%税率），又有百分比提成（15%税率）。接受广播剧制作组邀请参与某集相关内容制作的人员，作为广播公司及广播剧制作组的的客人只有酬谢费（属礼品税, 35%税率）。
Percentage per episode or fixed $100 per episode for participating radio prgram producing.
In U.S., a Science Academy scientist has salary need to pay federal income tax (rate 28%-33%), while the intellectual income earned during this Science Academy employment need to pay federal intellectual income (rate 15%), how to separate this scientist's income is the same how to separate per episode fixed or per episode percentage. I never participated in producing so I don't have any salary but major featured person fee (rate 15%), producing team has the salary(rate 28%-33%) and intellectual income from percentage share (rate 15%), each guest invited by the radio company or the producing team to participate producing of certain episode(s) would only receive gift of $100 per episode which is for federal gifting tax (rate 35%) if beyond certain amount per year.
----2018年11月23日。
有关参与广播剧制作是应该以每集百分比提成或者是每集固定酬谢金100美金左右。
在美国都是法律规定，不只是行规。比如，作为美国科学院的一名科学家，其工资收入是按照美国的联邦收入所得税28%-33%缴纳，而在其拿该工资在美国科学院工作期间所创造的智慧产权收入是按照联邦智慧收入税15%缴纳。这中间的区别和广播剧的百分比提成还是每集固定收入的区别是类似的。我因为完全不参与广播剧制作，所以没有固定工资收入，只有主要角色的百分比提成（15%税率），而广播剧制作组既有固定工资收入（28%-33%税率），又有百分比提成（15%税率）。接受广播剧制作组邀请参与某集相关内容制作的人员，作为广播公司及广播剧制作组的的客人只有酬谢费（属礼品税, 35%税率）。
Percentage per episode or fixed $100 per episode for participating radio prgram producing.
In U.S., a Science Academy scientist has salary need to pay federal income tax (rate 28%-33%), while the intellectual income earned during this Science Academy employment need to pay federal intellectual income (rate 15%), how to separate this scientist's income is the same how to separate per episode fixed or per episode percentage. I never participated in producing so I don't have any salary but major featured person fee (rate 15%), producing team has the salary(rate 28%-33%) and intellectual income from percentage share (rate 15%), each guest invited by the radio company or the producing team to participate producing of certain episode(s) would only receive gift of $100 per episode which is for federal gifting tax (rate 35%) if beyond certain amount per year.
----2018年11月23日。
11-22-2018 Chinese Military's money and "No seeding related debt owed"（中国军费以及”没欠了下种费“）
1: Chinese Military's money
My answer is the same as the explanation given in this morning's broadcasting. If it already has been confirmed for certain that all those checks from the Chinese Military have been titled to the U.S. Military's unit(s) account name(s), please don't confuse as if my name Min Fang is the other name of the U.S. Military.
I never received a penny from the Chinese Military. All my medical expenses billings have been in my own name. This morning's confusion regarding this in the expression of “To live or to die, both heavy debt" was expressed by Pan, Li(潘莉), who is graduated the same class same year from the same Junior high school I graduated. The "senior of her good friend's husband" she mentioned is David Petraeus' father. She met this good friend of hers before 2004.
My medical treatment has been good, I was treated completely for a minor concern this morning, plus some routine regulars of course. As usual, my health has no concerns but annoyingness.
1: 有关中国军费一些款项的下落
我的回答和今天早上所播出的解释是一样的，就是如果都已经查实确定了所有这些由中国军方开具的支票都是以美国军方的部门账号作为支票抬头的，就不要混淆误以为我的名字方敏居然会是美国军方的一个别号。
我从未收到过中国军方给付的任何款项。我所有的医疗费用账单从来都是我本人的名字方敏。听说今天早上表达”活罪难逃，死罪难免“的是我初中的一个同班同学潘莉，所表达的是对中国军费支出的困扰。她所提到的她的一个很好的2004年以前就认识的美国朋友的丈夫家里的当家老人指的是
我的治疗一直很好，今天早上也是一样，除了让人担心的一片区域给治好了，还有也就是常规治疗了。和平时一样，我的健康方面没有担心事就只有烦人事。
我的治疗一直很好，今天早上也是一样，除了让人担心的一片区域给治好了，还有也就是常规治疗了。和平时一样，我的健康方面没有担心事就只有烦人事。
----Nov. 22nd, 2018
2: About the frustration of don't want to beg for money and anger where is their own money.
My answer will never change, my answer has been I have no idea where your money is, I am certain I don't have a penny of your own money. I don't ever need you to beg for my money, and I totally don't ever need you at all.
I am raised by my parents, not the other child from my same parents, not any of my parents' siblings nor their relatives.
I share all my grandfathers with my grandfathers' other children is a true statement of course, but all of my grandfathers never left any debt for me to pay is also a true statement. All of my grandfathers left no debt at all which means no debt at all for their seeding fees and their sexual intercourses fees that have associated with the births of all their offsprings.
My anger about their frustration is why after all these years after all my grandfathers' deaths (the last one died in 1965), how can they be so confused as if their own houses never had family inheriting at each generation's senior's death.
I was never told what my father had left behind after his 2013 "death" in China, it was in January of 2015 that I heard of my father's "2013 death".
2: 有关不想当个讨饭的就是一定要知道自己的钱在哪里的那份愤怒困扰。
我的回答永远不会改变，我的回答从来就是：我从来不知道你的钱在哪里，我很确定我这里没有你的一分钱。我永远不会需要你到我这里来讨饭吃，我就是永远都是完完全全的就是不会需要你。
我是被我自己的父母养育的，我从来不是由我父母的另一个孩子养大的，我也不是由我父母的兄弟姊妹养大，我更不是由我父母的亲戚们养大的。
我是被我自己的父母养育的，我从来不是由我父母的另一个孩子养大的，我也不是由我父母的兄弟姊妹养大，我更不是由我父母的亲戚们养大的。
我所有的爷爷们都是我是和其他方家后人们共同拥有的，这确实是一句实话，但是我所有的爷爷们都没给我留下任何未还的债务也是一句实话。我所有的爷爷们都没留给我任何未还的欠债也就是已经说明了我所有的爷爷们统统都没有欠了任何方家后人的与任何方家后人的出生有关的任何交配费及任何下种费。
我对他们这份困扰的愤怒就是在我所有的爷爷都已经死了这么多年以后（最后一个爷爷方智仁是在1965年就去世的），他们居然还装腔作势如此困扰就好像在每一代的老人去世时他们那一支居然在分家时没分到过家产似的。
我从未被告知我父亲2013年在中国“去世“后都留下了些什么东西。我是在2015年一月才听说了我父亲"2013年就已经去世"的消息。
----2018年11月22日。
11-21-2018 What are they challenging when knowing money ownership is according to Laws?
Heard of this morning's broadcasting about schools, I agree that other than most handsome tuition gift, enrolling to a college education program and a graduate education program is not the subject can be demanded as a token of the proven true romance favoritism.
----November 21st, 2018
Talking about my horrible experiences from those graduated each of same schools I went, I just don't get what privilege them to demand my money? I said money ownership by law which certainly means any money I can possess should be lawfully my money, how can they just disagree with laws to transfer money without a Judge's ruling? They say they are not even eligible to go to any court, either because of certainly not the beneficiary person to any Trust I inherited, or because of not even biologically associated with the settler of each Trust I inherited, then, on what ground, and how can they disagree with the laws about money lawful ownership, the United States laws or the People's Republic of China's laws?
Because holiday seasons are coming, recent broadcasting has been all about how some organized presentations of determination to block or to transfer any money out if I am the recipient of the money, just because of the disagreeing attitude, they either use computer technology to devoid signing person's signature of any money transfer request, or to forge a signature to take out money without authorization, even if that is the money from government agency's Treasury accounts, such as SSI or an equivalent. No wonder I heard all these broadcasting of angry responses from agency's officials: "My signature cannot be altered", "My signature cannot be devoided", etc. Exactly, who are these people challenging when knowing what they disagree is the United States laws?
Why would I help those who intend (intended) to make a victim of public abusiveness?
I refuse any financial demands requested to me in this morning's broadcasting.
----November 21st, 2018
谈到上学念书，很多人，特别是我们这一代在大学时就已经在向往国外留学生涯。我是二十几岁出来念书，完全是按照我大学学生时代的梦想，做一份餐馆工每天辛苦挣学费上的学念的书。过了将近二十年，才又重新回学校，这次我是坚决想要舒服点，就只专心念书不为生活学费等等操心。再者，现在也不像以前年纪轻没什么事，整天精力充沛，除了不肯坐下来念念书，什么都有精力。现在是我的健康未来至少是我的家庭会花费我很多精力的，所以今后念书我也会坚持如此舒服点。
我相信很多人和我一样，也很喜欢念书。我自己没有过但我能想象我会有朋友们是眼睛里会含着泪水说：就只想重回学校到国外念书。我的态度，真是朋友也就真是不用多说，自己准备好申请学校的材料，需要经济担保时（一般应该是在符合录取条件之后）， 告诉我你想去的那个国家的学校的付费账号就可以了，如果生活上也有担心，也是告诉我就得，我也是会如实告知我能帮你多少。虽然我现在不清楚我什么时候可以拿到生活费用给付，但我建议别等，按照你们自己的条件能力先做起来，我一旦收到就会公布，你们也就是不用再苦哈哈的了。
----2018年11月21日。
我方敏拒绝今天早上通过广播剧向我提出的所有要钱要求，我方敏坚决拒绝所有这些公开以中国国家领导人本人及其家属名义进行的，而且已经是公然违反中华人民共和国现行法律的所有敲诈勒索要求。
有人说不管什么原因不管处境多难，我都不应该痛骂中国仇恨中国。我的回答是：请你先分清在你自己心目中，中国960万平方公里的领土是一个十三亿中国人民的共和国，还是你已经认可那960万平方公里土地其实已经是一些个别领导人事实上的共妻婚姻所赋予他们的共妻婚姻家庭的私有领土之后，再说清你的看法。我对中国一些国家领导人的痛骂，是非常明确的指名道姓公开痛骂，痛骂原因更是举世共知的非常明确毫不含糊，你为何会认为那是对中华人民共和国的仇恨？你为何会认为那是对中国十三亿人民的不耻？你为何会认为那是对中华民族的否定？----November 20th, 2018
----2018年11月21日。
Talking about my horrible experiences from those graduated each of same schools I went, I just don't get what privilege them to demand my money? I said money ownership by law which certainly means any money I can possess should be lawfully my money, how can they just disagree with laws to transfer money without a Judge's ruling? They say they are not even eligible to go to any court, either because of certainly not the beneficiary person to any Trust I inherited, or because of not even biologically associated with the settler of each Trust I inherited, then, on what ground, and how can they disagree with the laws about money lawful ownership, the United States laws or the People's Republic of China's laws?
Because holiday seasons are coming, recent broadcasting has been all about how some organized presentations of determination to block or to transfer any money out if I am the recipient of the money, just because of the disagreeing attitude, they either use computer technology to devoid signing person's signature of any money transfer request, or to forge a signature to take out money without authorization, even if that is the money from government agency's Treasury accounts, such as SSI or an equivalent. No wonder I heard all these broadcasting of angry responses from agency's officials: "My signature cannot be altered", "My signature cannot be devoided", etc. Exactly, who are these people challenging when knowing what they disagree is the United States laws?
Why would I help those who intend (intended) to make a victim of public abusiveness?
I refuse any financial demands requested to me in this morning's broadcasting.
----November 21st, 2018
谈到上学念书，很多人，特别是我们这一代在大学时就已经在向往国外留学生涯。我是二十几岁出来念书，完全是按照我大学学生时代的梦想，做一份餐馆工每天辛苦挣学费上的学念的书。过了将近二十年，才又重新回学校，这次我是坚决想要舒服点，就只专心念书不为生活学费等等操心。再者，现在也不像以前年纪轻没什么事，整天精力充沛，除了不肯坐下来念念书，什么都有精力。现在是我的健康未来至少是我的家庭会花费我很多精力的，所以今后念书我也会坚持如此舒服点。
我相信很多人和我一样，也很喜欢念书。我自己没有过但我能想象我会有朋友们是眼睛里会含着泪水说：就只想重回学校到国外念书。我的态度，真是朋友也就真是不用多说，自己准备好申请学校的材料，需要经济担保时（一般应该是在符合录取条件之后）， 告诉我你想去的那个国家的学校的付费账号就可以了，如果生活上也有担心，也是告诉我就得，我也是会如实告知我能帮你多少。虽然我现在不清楚我什么时候可以拿到生活费用给付，但我建议别等，按照你们自己的条件能力先做起来，我一旦收到就会公布，你们也就是不用再苦哈哈的了。
----2018年11月21日。
我方敏拒绝今天早上通过广播剧向我提出的所有要钱要求，我方敏坚决拒绝所有这些公开以中国国家领导人本人及其家属名义进行的，而且已经是公然违反中华人民共和国现行法律的所有敲诈勒索要求。
有人说不管什么原因不管处境多难，我都不应该痛骂中国仇恨中国。我的回答是：请你先分清在你自己心目中，中国960万平方公里的领土是一个十三亿中国人民的共和国，还是你已经认可那960万平方公里土地其实已经是一些个别领导人事实上的共妻婚姻所赋予他们的共妻婚姻家庭的私有领土之后，再说清你的看法。我对中国一些国家领导人的痛骂，是非常明确的指名道姓公开痛骂，痛骂原因更是举世共知的非常明确毫不含糊，你为何会认为那是对中华人民共和国的仇恨？你为何会认为那是对中国十三亿人民的不耻？你为何会认为那是对中华民族的否定？----November 20th, 2018
----2018年11月21日。
11-20-2018 What same high school graduated means? Why some are in trouble? What trouble? （同一个高中毕业的对我意味着什么？）
Heard this morning's broadcasting about Treasury. I heard one is the same year same class graduated from the same high school, the other one is the younger generation from the same high school graduated. I heard the reason is they disagree this or that money should be considered my possible money is the reason they are in the trouble.
How could they possibly be in trouble just because they disagree I should be the one have some inherited money? Oh, I heard it is because they took actions to transfer the money out of the money's lawfully registered account owners' reach if they ever consider that maybe my possible money.
( Money Ownership by Laws, no need for special asking around who is the real owner. The lawfully registered account owner is the real lawful owner of the money in the account. 财产所有权由法律决定，不需到处询问谁才是财产的真正主人。合法登记的账户主人就是账户里财产的真正合法主人。----Nov. 19th, 2018 )
How about the graduate education story? I heard that is the husband to another same class same year graduated from the same high school person. The husband works for the agency location that I have huge complaints about the haughty attitudes beyond the gratitudes a commoner would expect from government employees, plus shared hostility against who I am but not romance related. This was since early 2015, not before. The wife works for another agency that I have complained as well, but I never send inquiries to her job-related offices or the in trouble same class one's husband's related offices, but only to her agency's legal office so that my complaints only related to the frustrations regarding where is the money that should have paid-out already to cover my living expenses.
I have been in freezing coldness since early 2015 because "Who the fxxx you think you are, we are all graduated from these same high school as well." In Boston, there are over 10 already for the same class or the same year, which not include their families nor those "just not the same year".
Just because they came from the same high school, they just have this attitude that they should make their desired decisions about my any possible money, but myself should just be a beggar compare to who they are. How could I possibly not in freezing coldness? I am not even allowed to receive government agency's food help, not allowed to request housing transfer, all because they came from the same high school I graduated over 30 years ago? I heard some of them are in positions to "do not allow". I heard about them only a couple of months ago, I have to say I am so lucky I am in the lawful United States. I just need to express myself as "who the fxxx they think they are" is my forever attitude towards them as well, and it is the same that they should never expect me to help out their troubles as well.
If you are known to your associated as alumni from this high school, but you are not aware that I am considered "this school's enemy deserved to be prosecuted by all alumni", please check if you are already a similar victim as well because alumni's participation is too high. Nothing particular happened in my high school years, my experiences in Boston are too abnormal , possibly under investigation. (如果你周围的人都知道你也是南师大附中毕业的，但你本人没听说我都已经是”这个学校的公敌而应该被所有校友所惩罚”之类的，请查一下你自己是否也已经是类似迫害事件的受害者，南师大附中毕业校友的参与程度高的实在是很吓人，我的高中三年没什么特别的事情，我在波城实在太某明奇妙的遭遇可能已在警方调查当中。）
Also, if in need to contact law enforcement, better contact other city's law enforcement. Locals can be very complicated or even a hostile community situation if already being a victim without knowing what happened. Best is through the online web page. Law enforcement professionals know how to handle such concerns. （还有，如果需要报警，最好是异地报警。当地人事关系可能很复杂甚至有可能都已经形成了纠帮成伙的敌意势力，特别是你自己什么都还不知道就已经损失惨重的情况。最好就是网上报警，警方专业人员很清楚应该如何处理这种担心。我的情况，我是在美国波士顿耶，毕业都已经三十多年了，一点联系都没有就某明奇妙被盯上了，看看有可能牵涉的，南京师范大学，南师大附中（高中，初中），南师大附小，南师大附属幼儿院，毕业的，转了学的，及其他们的家属）
听说有人抱怨说我这是在落井下石，为什么呀？就只是从同一所中学高中毕业的而已，还是三十几年前的1985年就已经高中毕业了，毕业后还是一点联系都没有，或者还不是同班甚至不是同届，我方敏也就是这一两个月才听说有他们这批人在我周围存在。他们对我方敏的态度居然是“就是不认可我方敏应该会有钱应该会有成就"。只要有可能是我方敏的钱，不管钱究竟放在谁的名字下面，他们就是敢直接拿走花掉。他们 就是乐意鄙视我方敏，就是乐意一定要让他们所有的美国同事都知道他们特别清楚我方敏就只是个讨饭的，怎么我方敏直说他们做了如此这些，才会有他们今天的麻烦，就成了我方敏对他们落井下石了？我方敏对他们的态度对他们的回答永远就是“你XX的又算老几？”我就是乐意接受美国法律的保护，我就是乐意看到美国是个法治国家，我方敏对他们所有的一切麻烦都永远不会同情永远不会伸手帮忙更永远不会提供任何协助。
----November 20th, 2018
有人说不管什么原因不管处境多难，我都不应该痛骂中国仇恨中国。我的回答是：请你先分清在你自己心目中，中国960万平方公里的领土是一个十三亿中国人民的共和国，还是你已经认可那960万平方公里土地其实已经是一些个别领导人事实上的共妻婚姻所赋予他们的共妻婚姻家庭的私有领土之后，再说清你的看法。我对中国一些国家领导人的痛骂，是非常明确的指名道姓公开痛骂，痛骂原因更是举世共知的非常明确毫不含糊，你为何会认为那是对中华人民共和国的仇恨？你为何会认为那是对中国十三亿人民的不耻？你为何会认为那是对中华民族的否定？
----November 20th, 2018
11-19-2018 My high school in Nanjing of China, my residence in Massachusetts of U.S.
This morning's broadcasting featured a female who was my classmate from high school. I heard there are total ten people of such same high school graduated in the same year are now state employees officed in Boston of Massachusetts, but none of them I have ever associated since high school graduation in 1985. We never had a high school reunion.
I heard it was featured a couple of months ago, it obviously was from their own expression that all of them have shared negativeness regarding who I have become or who I self-claimed have become, professionally and financially. I have been wondering for the reasons why their negativeness against who I have become can be so strong when I have not been associated for over 30 years which include all these years I stayed in Boston of Massachusetts. Well, as long as they are aware who they should appreciate are not friendly toward me, and now I am aware what my situation has been, well, I say as long as I am protected by the same laws effectively as well. For everyone else's curiosity, their sponsor Mrs. J R is maiden named Miss J O. I did hear it was once broadcasted there would be someone knows who I was every way I turn, I did have contacted laws regarding why I felt being stalked.
Well, to everyone if ever concerns what will be the situation, I never feel I should contact them for any of my troubles after I heard about them, so, that will remain the same. I heard it was broadcasted it is obviously impossible to fancy resourceless me can be a helping hand for them if in situations, well, I add my thoughts here frankly that I may not even have any willingness if what I have experienced have been more than just some negative thoughts from these never even associated since the year graduated from the same high school. This would be the same and applicable to everyone from my past.
Money Ownership by Laws, no need for special asking around who is the real owner. The lawfully registered account owner is rhe real lawful owner of the money in the account.
财产所有权由法律决定，不需到处询问谁才是财产的真正主人。合法登记的账户主人就是账户里财产的真正合法主人。
----Nov. 19th, 2018
爸爸妈妈：据说纽约情况类似，据说在美国政府机关做工的南师大附中毕业的，特别是同班同届毕业的，对我敌意都很大，请注意。什么事都别去找他们，遇上也就回避。听说过“（美国）要关起门来痛打方敏”，估计就是指的他们这些人或者就是他们说的。我们的生活费用及我的智慧产权收入都收不到，可能也和他们这些人有很大关系。
11-19-2018 怎样下载中文拼音打字
----2018年11月19日。
11-18-2018 与南京方面的矛盾 (4) ---- 南师大附中的住校生
因为不适应学校离家比较远，我在南师大附中念高一的时候曾经住校一年，住在里面其实只有一个学期，但床位是占了一年，高一下半学期，我是自己每天骑自行车上学，但铺盖留在学校床位上了。我在南京四中念初一时，也是如此。那时住校是有专门的老师分管的，也就是6：30AM吹哨起床有体育老师带着跑步做早操，然后就是自己独立了，也就是自己上课，上食堂，上晚自修，晚上9：00PM教室熄灯就自己回寝室就寝。我记得我住校时，因为没什么零花钱，这两个学校附近都是连个小吃店小卖部都没有，所以除了回家，都是在校园里待着。据说，我的那个没撤的床位是很多人根本不知道我去了哪里的原因。有段时间我每天放学就骑自行车回家了，晚上都没回寝室睡觉，但白天我会去寝室午睡一会儿。
我不太适应住校生活，就是因为从早到晚，都是学习时间，要么教室里坐着，或者宿舍里就一个人呆着，宿舍还没电。我觉得这充足的学习时间对我而言实在太长，一个星期里只要一天的晚自修就已经完成了我一个星期的学习时间，所以剩下几天，我可以回家，累点也没关系，反正回家不用念书。我就是这么逐渐适应了学校离家较远的初高中生活。
当时高中和我同班同届的住校生，可能不知道我去了哪里而产生过很多猜测，是造成我们班我们这一届的上下几届2004年听说了我的故事之后，认为我从不单纯的原因。我确实也没想过需要和她们说一声，但我当时只是初高中生又没钱，也从没想过除了回家，还有可能有那里可以去，我不在学校里，当然就是在家里了。当时分管住校的老师应该有问过，但没向她们解释，因为我有要求因为还不适应远程上学所以需要继续留着床铺，初高中都是如此。
还有就是高二下半学期时“向老师告了住校生的状“。我不是太清楚究竟是怎么回事，我汇报的也就是我当时很奇怪一个明显只读书的女生怎么也会为了一个老师结婚了而愤怒不已。这个老师是在我们高一时请假结的婚，替他代课的老师有宣布，当时都已经结婚一两年了。宣布的时候我还是高中部新生入学不久，又是近视眼不肯戴眼镜坐在最后一排，我们班的同学对他结婚消息是否有反应，我是完全不知情。
我和南师大附中住校生的矛盾可能是，我当时不是太懂所涉及的谈话，可能有谈到会涉及处分，我当时有说要是真需要处分谁谁，（当时不知是谁但认为应该也不会是那个让我觉得很奇怪的明显只念书的女生），可能会影响他们考大学，所以应该是悄悄地别影响他们高考。我听说他们好像对处分很愤怒，好像是认为是有意刁难。我只知道当时学校有调查，听说处分意见是在调查了几个月之后才决定的。据说那个“北京前女友”的长子（当时是刚离开上海的复旦大学回到了北京）也参与了当年的这场谈话。
至于我当时为何有机会告状，是否故意。当时不是特意告状，当时并不明白严重性，也就只是奇怪他们怎么给气成那样，都气得哆嗦了，实在是印象深刻。当时的”告状“机会是因为已经高二下半学期，面临高考分文理班，我高二当时的成绩也就只能努力努力可以保证考上大专，所以和我聊了聊。没想到我很自信，而且我介绍的学习方法也确实有效，高考成绩下来，我是我们班的女生成绩第一名。
*当年是我的三代爷爷捐款国民政府教育部以建立中国的中央大学系统是真实。我当时就可以出国念大学也是真实。我对在中国的大学教育很满意也是真实。
*当时，企业管理，经济学在中国是文科班学生才可以报考的专业。
----2018年11月18日。
11-17-2018 "Let us calculate your spending for you" (“让我来帮你算一下帐”）
Heard about this morning's "Let us calculate yous expenses budgeting for you" episode, well, I had heard some storie that this was the reason "your" high school classmates toughly demanded to read through "your" accounting books if "you" have any investments.
I heard there were some researches about this which concluded that these annoyingness are from those who have their own spending frustration, that their own living quality provided by the level of their own spending is not good as assumption based on their own income.
----Nov. 17th, 2018
我估计我自己面临的压力就是那生活费的5%，会有人要帮着算一下。
我听说了有很多朋友亲戚的都很关心究竟我什么时候可以收到我的生活费用给付。反正有5%在那里，类似是我送礼，他们当然会希望看看有没有可能提高点买房的档次，出国留个学等等。他们现在想知道，也在观望，看是不是该等一等买房计划。
我的态度是：我自己也学到了，就是别等但要实际。亲戚之类的需要买房，现在就买，别等，但实是在在的，按照自己现在的能力来买。等我收到生活费用给付，有了5%，也就是卖了这个房子再按自己心意买一个。有人说就是如果现在买了房子装修就有点费思量，其实不用。在美国，从房子设计装修的广告宣传来看，很明显美国人很实际，确实也都有也就是什么时候再买第二套房子的平常心。美国的房子装修规则：要是硬装，就是能够增加房子价值的，剩下的都是软装，可以自己带着走，直到自己确定愿意住在自己很满意的房子里看着自己的孩子从牙牙学语到已经上大学了又结婚生子了。
我自己以前也是一直在等什么时候可以结束流浪，我都已经玩腻了。还好，醒悟的还不算太迟，所以我是MBA已经快毕业了。虽然我的专向是企业经营的常务管理，不是财经，但我现在的学历是可以去找一份初级会计工作来学学理财的。我可能会找个零时工之类的学学会计记账，做作业时就学到了如何记账对企业资产负债表的影响很大。欧美国家的会计规章改革也就是加强记账的规范化。
说这么多，就是为了安慰一些关心我是否有能力管理那5%的一些焦躁不安，我可以管理，我也能够管理。不过我确实从未有过类似经验，虽然就是类似送亲戚朋友的礼钱，但也不希望让一些亲戚朋友觉得我送礼有点某明奇妙的厚此薄彼不太公平，所以我会有一些专业帮助来协助平衡。有这5%可以送礼，当然就会有这份专业帮助了。我会在网上以表格方式让亲戚朋友和我联系要求我送礼。😊😊
因为我是美国公民，所以会有美国35%的礼物税。比方说，如果礼物税的基数是每个收礼人一年一万美金（夫妻合计两万元），我会在给你送礼的礼钱通知单里告知，你今年的礼金已达一万美金（夫妻合计两万美金)，今年内的其他礼钱将扣除35%的美国礼品税，即一万一千美金的礼钱，实际收到的金额是一万六百五十美金。
还有，就是我不会安排以年金方式支付的礼钱。既然送礼，当然希望对方长寿，对方当然会希望自己的孩子可以继承这份年金支付方式的礼物，所有的亲戚朋友也都会喜欢这种礼物方式，但累积起来对定限只有5%的每年礼钱总额会是很大的压力，所以很不实际。而一次买断社保金或者退休金都是一次就至少涉及几十万，上百万人民币（美金）的交易，虽然买断后由社保进行投资会有利得但物价也会上涨，所以也不会是绝大多数的朋友都会认为很实际的送礼要求。至于亲戚，这个决定也是他们收到礼物后应该由他们自己做的。很现实啊，是买房自住收租，还是买社保拿每月的社保给付，他们自己决定啦。
请不要以为就只是同一个学校毕业的，就是可以要求送一份以退休年金给付方式的份子钱。在国内就没这规矩，你们在国内结婚都没资格享受这种待遇，在我这儿是会被当成敲诈勒索要求的。
听听我听到的“不给就是不行的”愤怒要求：就只是同一个学校毕业的，或着就只是见过一面而已（甚至一面都没见过，听也没听说过），也就只是想要一份可以在美国欧洲居住生活的退休金待遇而已，就只是想要至少是国内的一处房子而已。我是统统都以敲诈勒索报警。
还有，谁谁是我妈妈的什么亲戚，听说过没听说过，反正就是凭什么就是不可以由我给一份和我妈妈一样的退休金？我的回答：你死绝了都不会被大众认为需要通知我妈一声，我妈死绝了你也从没认为有什么了不起的，你哪来的这份资格对我要求要和我妈比？你就是一滩狗屎而已。
还有，和我父亲没有任何血缘关系就只是也姓方，凭什么不可以享受方家后人一样的待遇？我的回答：因为你和我不是同一个方家血脉的后人，我也没欠你钱。
还有就是这种，他是这人的丈夫，她是那人的妻子，那只是他们的妻子她们的丈夫在骂你踩你剁死你，并不是他们自己。但你必须给他们一个面子，必须和她们的丈夫他们的妻子做个朋友，不可以对她们的丈夫他们的妻子不客气，否则就是难以理解。
我的回答：你的丈夫你的妻子不需要给你个面子就可以对我骂东骂西，我有机会抽你丈夫抽你妻子耳光子时，也没有任何需要给你个面子迟疑一分钟。我这辈子都不会长出一条男人阳具出来，我也就永远不会有任何需要会考虑给你一个什么吊面子。理解不理解，我都只是“特别愿意用一把厨房的砍刀向你们这群婊子养的头上砍去！！！”
----2018年11月17日
还有就是89年高校会议，我方敏没有因为参加89年高校会议得到任何私人好处，也从未向中国政府要求因为89年高校会议而奖励补偿，更不会因为参加了89年的高校会议就欠了任何其他参加会议者什么钱款。
按照各国的军法，都是以杀人罪名处理对平民开枪的本国军人。中国军法也是如此。89年处理学运时动用军队而不适用该项中国军法条款，就是因为中国政府的决定是出于一切为了国家人民利益，无任何私人利益。我方敏当时只是上海一个非军事院校的学生，作为参与会议的一名非军方非政府非决策人士，不管这一届中国中央政府对当时的中国中央政府对89年学运处理意见的看法如何，都是哪里轮得到由我来赔偿?
当时可能是和当时的北京市长陈希同聊天谈到等我学会了做生意，会带着大家一起做大生意，2004年我对中国的贡献都是大生意，也就是都已经兑现了。我听说了中国利润丰厚的地铁系统投资大户都是社保，公务员退休金及军人退休金。任何对此的误解和分歧都从来不应该是陈希同的家人居然通过广播剧上公开骂我是个婊子破鞋没人要的烂货的原因和理由。我也从不认为和一个中国的国家领导人生了一个私生子女就是可以在一个由宪法决定还是一个共和国的中国可以升官发财的骄傲。我从未因为参加了89年高校会议就欠了陈希同一家的。
----2018年11月17日
11-15-2018 为何我似乎已经不再在乎舆论？
都已经宣布了智慧产权收入的合法拥有权是正在进行中的法律调查了，也就是说我为何某明奇妙的，就被中国的李克强总理是否是为了喷红他自己的老婆程虹成为国家栋梁人才，才利用广播剧将我宣布成为全世界共知的“就只是一个假冒伪造剽窃者，就只是一个没人要的戏子而已"这一类的社会舆论应该也都是已经在调查期间了，这应该是我名誉恢复所需要的第一步吧。至于中国政府究竟在这事件中间扮演的是什么角色，演的什么戏，也都应该会撇清。
11-02-2018 中国政府组织的广播剧”宣布“演出的得益者及受害人
何况，现在都已经是调查是否是有些图财害命的因素在所有这些喧嚣里面了，还有一堆谁谁的财产是否也被卷走的调查，谁还有精力在乎社会舆论？我是很安分地在说，我已经被法律所保护，所以就很安安静静了。名誉及社会舆论的纠正至少是在人身和财产都已经安全以后的事情了，我再在乎名誉，我都必须实事求是的分清轻重缓急。何况，舆论制造是否是这一切可能犯罪事件的原因，环境，或者甚至是否是在掩护犯罪行为都必须先撇清，才有可能说舆论是否是在法律监督下的公正社会舆论，才有可能说是否有条件在意社会舆论的导向，才有可能谈是否可以纠正不实社会舆论。
----2018年11月16日。
江苏广播电台系统什么时候开始才参与广播剧的制作播出？为何现在的矛盾似乎是”为何忽略江苏广播电台系统才是这个广播剧的创意制作单位“?
我所知道的，广播剧制作创意是在2004年的7月1日，所谈内容包括这一部真实剧将由美国广播公司Clear Channel的106.7FM波段负责制作及播出事宜。
制作以我为主要人物的人物传记型真实广播剧是因为我在当天自己出资购买了我自己从出生就开始记录的保安影带记录而引发。我当时认为很适合作为传记型真实剧的语音资料，我成为主要人物是因为广播公司同意我所自荐的我有平淡却内容丰富的生活经历，而且所涉及的语音资料是在被我所购得的保安影带记录里。
我参加那天的电讯会议是由我自己的信托律师所安排，不是由洛克菲勒家的任何人所邀请，会议所涉及的主要内容也都和洛克菲勒家的任何人无关。所购保安影带也是由我自己的信托所支付（就是由我今年（2019年）健康及生活费用给付的同一家付款公司所支付的），不是由洛克菲勒家的任何人所支付的。
听说我在南京四中的初中同班同学，当时在前线歌舞团做歌唱演员的潘莉在2004年以前就认识了Holly Knowlton是造成江苏方面对广播剧为何以我为主要人物造成误会的原因。我当时没被告知潘莉在场是我未向她打招呼的原因。当时在场的我的同学同届以及校友都很多，上医的，美国桥口大学的，等等，实在很多可能是我未被一一告知的原因。
----2018年11月16日。
11-15-2018 和父系母系的血缘关系矛盾----什么是我理解的亲戚关系？
我一直说，我2004年继承以后愿意给我父亲的弟妹们一份礼物，是因为他们把我当亲戚。那为什么其他人就不是亲戚？
我在上海念大学五年，当时既无电话也无电邮，如果我想探访亲戚混个晚饭，根本就没有可能事先问一句我父亲在上海的两个妹妹是否有空接待我，而是在下午时分，算好晚餐时间可以到达就直接跳上汽车上门蹭饭去。我父亲上海的两个妹妹都是基本上从未替我特意购买过食材，但我父亲的小妹妹家里就特别明显，从不藏好吃的。不知他们背后有没有龇牙咧嘴的，但是如果有我喜欢吃的蛏子等等，都是在桌上一起吃，我常常还是吃的最多的。所以我说他们是把我当亲戚。听我父亲谈起他小时候的经历，我相信我爷爷的弟妹也是如此把我父亲当亲戚的。
我不清楚现在他们是否也是愤怒的一家。如果如此，我不能理解的就是，为什么他们就是不问法律，坚持认为我是窝藏了家里的钱？我爷爷当年没给我父亲一分钱，我父亲从未抱怨过他们这些弟妹根本就是闷了家里的钱，而他们作为我父亲弟妹，也从未认为他们有愧于我父亲，也就是认为是我爷爷自己的意愿没打算给我父亲什么财产，和他们能有什么关系。怎么现在我继承了我爷爷给我的钱，就成了我闷了家里的钱偷了他们的东西？
我爷爷替我设立的信托，1948年设立时的规模一共就只有一千五百百万美金，我2004年继承后愿意送给他们的礼物规模是每家八千万美金（五亿人民币）。作为亲戚，我给他们的礼物是很丰厚的，态度也很好，没有一点对不起他们的。现在可能因为都已经各自有家了，据说闹得很凶，我也就是随缘了。
我听说的一些愤怒还有更让我难以理解的，就是所谓的对等关系。比如，当年我是可以上他们家和他们父母（夫妻）一起在同一张饭桌上吃饭的，现在他们就必须和我夫妻小孩一张饭桌上吃饭，否则就是不行。为什么？这些人是想和我这个亲戚一起进餐，还是想要有机会可以操我男人生个孩子出来？
还有，我听说的要求还有更离谱的。在我母亲的大姐领养她自己的小孩以前，也就是说，只是在我十一，十二岁之前，如果我在他们家里玩的开心了，我是可以睡在我母亲的大姐夫妻家里的一张备用小床上的，现在他们领养的小孩作为他们自己的小孩，就是必须要可以随时睡在我夫妻家里的同一套房子的某一张床上，否则就是不行。为什么？我母亲的大姐一家在他们领养了他们自己的小孩以后，如果我们去做客，他们家是好东西不上桌好东西藏起来早就已经是天经地义，就只是在表达这是他们自己的家而我们只是几个做客的她的穷妹妹的小孩这么一个立场而已。我是一点没在乎过他们家的立场表达。我现在已经也表达了我自己的立场，早就已经不欠他们家的了，从我十一二岁开始，就只认为他们家是个亲戚而已。我母亲”去世”以后，他们家对我母亲2006年的“去世”，一副“总算是少了个讨饭的，可以省点开销”的态度让我也早已不再当他们一家是亲戚了。
从1988年失去工作，中间做做会计临时工，直到“2006年去世”，我母亲都一直是由我父亲中国科学院的高额退休金养着的。他们一家对我母亲的接济，也就是因为这些都已经是经年的矛盾，在我母亲“去世”后，都由我父亲用他替我母亲存下的生活费用还清了。我父亲比我母亲年长了十岁，身体也一直不是很好，从我母亲失去正式工作的1988年，我父亲就开始省吃俭用，替我母亲存下了她如果需要自己一个人生活的未来生活保障。我父亲2006年时就是用这笔钱还清的。我是1990年开始工作的，我弟弟是1988年开始工作的。
----2018年11月15日。
11-14-2018 这些华人的逻辑思维有问题？还是认为装痴呆抽抽疯就可以勒索钱财？
听说我总说自己有钱实在是太烦人，所以海外华裔华商，国内初高中及大学校友同乡同国，甚至中国政府全国人大委员会，虽然绝大多数都是我从不认识的一群，但都必须以痛斥谩骂来劝劝我，让我不要再说自己有钱了。好像他们这么在广播电台上这么劝劝，就可以让我的合法钱财就因为我不再说我自己有钱就不归我所有了？或者劝劝就可以防止我只要在网上宣布宣布我自己有钱就可以把别人的钱全归自己了，还是连手都不用伸出去就可以，就只管在网上宣布然后就只等钱进账了？谁是那中国政府中国人大，怎么就认定了就只要拿个话筒在广播电台上宣布宣布就可以拥有中国政府中国960万平方公里的统治权？所以我就说啊，中华人民共和国的宪法还有效吗？
为什么如此高规格，却就是不给我在此博客上公布的电邮地址SomebodyinMA@gmail.com发一封电邮？据说不给我发电邮表达是因为我方敏就是不配和中国政府中国国内海外华裔的任何人有联络，那怎么中国政府全国人大的代表怎么就是一定只能用广播来劝说？在劝谁啊？广大听众？他们很清楚波士顿的广播电台没有播出，我也没有可能正式听到他们的立场表达。
他们是脑子有屎啊？还是在装疯卖傻？他们根本就是如下这么一群：
先天愚傻够不着嫩，老年痴呆又够不着熟，直说原来是个终生脑残。
犬稚癞痢就缺了伶，人老珠黄更就缺了俐，坦言难怪属相常年蠢猪。
横批：实事求是
----2018年11月14日。
还有，有人说我是否和彭丽媛有仇，才会老说她丈夫习近平和别人有孩子？
我的回应：我就是这么听说的，那两个人的孩子是习近平自己公开承认的，现在都已经三十多岁了。我和彭丽媛从来不认识从来不是什么朋友，但我也没需要踩她跺她来帮另一个。据说现在习近平与彭丽媛都已经两人公开表态，不管是什么情况他们都是永远的夫妻的情况下，我也一点都不同情彭丽媛，和他们所有这些人也都不会认识不会有任何交往。我父亲方文海在国内作为中国公民却没有任何由中国政府保障的法律权益的悲惨遭遇已经足够说明习近平李克强是以什么样的资格做的什么样的领导人了。
----2018年11月14日
11-13-2018 Who should I appreciate after graduation? (和同班同届的矛盾是什么？)
There has been a lot of anger regarding my "bad attitude" towards those graduated from the same schools. And I have my anger as well, they are alumni from the same school is a true statement, but they are not my personal friends is also a true statement as well. I should and I do appreciate the school I received education from, but why should I appreciate those individual alumni I never even heard of?
A lot of complaints are about me being somebody if having big investments, I should arrange some job opportunities for the same school alumni, it is very common everywhere. This is true, and I have no problem with it, but I think my appreciation should be towards the school I graduated from, not any individual alumni I never even heard.
The huge problem I have with some Chinese graduated from the Bridgeport University is similar. A lot stronger anger from them because we had graduated several years already in 2004 when they heard that I have some resources as a way to put it decently because they never believed I could have any inheriting. I had a huge problem with this anger of "deserved to have a job donated to work for" from this group and an even bigger problem with those same-school-graduated from China whose anger is "deserved to get paychecks or equivalent for just being the same school graduated".
I had five years of programming work experience already in 2004, that I knew it was impossible for those who had graduated for several years without engineering work experience to compete with newly graduated. On July 1st of 2004, I was talking about the software industry started to have a new trend to pay attention to quality assurance which was my first profession. I heard that after I found my job of quality assurance in July of 2004, a lot of this group of Bridgeport University graduated Chinese had all heard that it would be a great job market if they could check out information about software(application) quality assurance jobs. I heard the huge complaints and anger after 2004-2005 has been they don't know where and how to find such jobs which pissed me off enormously.
Some said other communities' alumni have another issue with me which is why I don't like to mention it was the University of Bridgeport I graduated from. My frustration has been why I need to mention? The entire time, it has been on my resume whenever I am presenting everything I am good at in Computer Science.
The same is the Shanghai Medical University, which I have mentioned I a lot more because my class of pharmacology major had the privilege to share the entire set of the Basic Medical System courses with the medicine major, which means I learned how to diagnose and treat a lot of common diseases from this education, but short of rich clinic experiences if compare to a practicing family doctor.
Similar anger from those graduated from the same high school or junior high school in Nanjing:
Since my college graduation in 1990:
1: Why you don't like to mention the Shanghai Medical University you graduated from, is it because you had been pretty shabby there? (My frustration: Why would I talk to you about people and things you never heard of?)
2: How could it possible that you don't fancy guys from the same high school? (My frustration: Haven't you ever met anyone else from some places else?)
Since my inheriting in 2004:
1: Why is it wrong to spend some of "your" money? We know you got nothing to do with those rich men already. We have Nanjing Automobile Group Co., Ltd (南汽) locally in Nanjing. (My frustration: I never thought local American could possibly know so much less about local American riches than Nanjingese in China? )
2: How come you forgot we graduated from the same (junior) high school? (My frustration: Other than "What do you mean?", what else can I put in words?)
----Nov 13th, 2018
爸爸，你的“被开除军籍”处分，很多不是勘探兵的现役和退伍军人都没听懂，不知道那是部队对于你们几个受影响的人最合适的安排和最安全的保护，他们都认为那是很严重的处分，我听说有很多人甚至认为中国方面2013年对你的态度其实是在执行军事法庭当年的处罚，我已经就我所知道的在我的博文里做了解释，在很多人还没听说过我的解释也不太弄得明白的情况下，多小心。
我听说的是，那个观测站一年有七个月是深埋在厚沙下面，只有通气口，没有任何光线，观测站除了观测设施，没有任何其他物品也没有多余空间，只能容纳一人。广播局所报道的几个人当时都是已经连续三年单人驻扎如此恶劣环境，全部都已经有了心理已经难以承受如此环境的临床心理症状。我的解释博文如下。
I heard a lot of veterans and enlisted who have not been mapping specialist did not understand the featured story about my father's dishonorable release. What I heard is: The observatory is located in the area that covered by thick sands seven months each year, not natural light nor electric, no extra space other than limited space for equipment and one person. I heard all of those featured person in that episode had developed psychological symptoms of unbearable-ness after three years consecutive one-person's assignment in such observatory. Following was my original explanation about this "dishonorable discharge".
----March 21st, 2019
11-12-2018 My father's Related ---- Military Dishonorable Release （和我父亲有关的 ---- 被开除军籍的处分）
Military Dishonorable Release （被开除军籍的处分）
My father got a dishonorable release from Chinese Military after his five years service, including three years in a one person's observatory deep and deep in the desert, what could possibly the misconduct he did that cost him such? He disobeyed the order of an extended another three years at the same post. 我父亲在中国军队服役五年，包括在沙漠无人区观测站一个人驻扎整整三年，却是被开除军籍离开中国人民解放军的。我父亲究竟做了什么违反军纪的事情，会导致如此严重处分？我听说当时是因为我父亲违抗军令拒绝再在同一个沙漠观测站再待三年。
That post locates near the spot where famous scientist Peng, Jiamu went missing June of 1980, a supposed one year's post. My father was the first person assigned to this post for three years and was ordered to stay for another three years prompted my father's disobeying. The Marshall Court's ruling was my father got dishonorable release and his direct commander(assigner) went in himself for three years. （那个观测站就位于著名的科学家彭家木1980年6月失踪的沙漠地区，本应是一个任命为期一年的无人区观测站。我父亲是第一个奉令驻扎三年的军人，他被同一个长官命令再在同一个观察站驻扎三年是我父亲拒绝执行该军令的原因。当年的军事法庭裁决是我父亲因不执行军令被开除军籍，他的长官自己进该沙漠无人区观察站驻扎三年。）
I heard in my father's commanding chain, my father's direct commander was the only person who never had any assignment nor experience to work in a desert post was the reason for the entire matter.（我听说我父亲的整个上级领导单位里，只有这个顶头上司从未有过奉令驻守沙漠观察站或者类似的沙漠无人区工作经验，是整个事件及处理意见的原因。）
That post located in a real no man's land that no one can survive after three-days walking on feet. I heard my father's commander was re-assigned after a year. I heard that post was changed to a group post after my father's commander staying. I heard this was the featured broadcasted when my father's military experienced was first featured over 8 years ago that a lot of civilian audiences did not get. （那个观测站位于沙漠无人区内，没人可以在步行三天后还能存活。我听说我父亲的长官是在一年以后被调离该观察站。我听说自从我父亲的长官被调离后，那个观测站被调整成了小组观测站。我听说这是八年多以前我父亲从军经历首次播出时的故事，但好像是很多没当过兵的普通老百姓统统都没听懂的故事。）
Why my father never complain if this Marshall Court ruling was unfair? Possibly, my father felt more comfortable this is the ruling that makes no one can keep him in Chinese Military to have any such assignment anymore. My father was a Mapping specialist that had one year's military training which required for a minimum 5 years service but eligible to be extended to 20 years if his release request not approved.（为什么我父亲从未抱怨军事法庭的如此裁决对我父亲是否公平？我估计，我父亲可能是认为这个裁决一下来，就没人可以让他再留在军队里，再给他类似的工作安排。我父亲当时是观测兵，属部队培训的技术兵种，至少需服役五年，但可延长至20年。服役期间如想离开部队需申请转业，转业申请如不批准就不得离开部队，直到20年的最高服役期满。）
----Nov. 12th, 2018
Should the rumored man who seeded in my younger brother's marriage the same equal husband in his marriage?
My response: I have nothing to do with my younger brother's marriage. If that male should be the same equal husband in my younger brother's marriage is never my business. I have refused to be associated with my younger brother's marriage family, which of course includes no association with any matter related to if my younger brother's marriage should have another same equal husband because of a birth child.
那个给我弟弟的老婆下种的男人是否应该被认为是我弟弟婚姻里另一个应该平等权利的丈夫？
我的回答：我和所有这些人及事都是一点关系都没有。那个男的是不是我弟弟婚姻里的二房丈夫都和我无关。我早就已经拒绝和我弟弟的婚姻家庭之间的任何关系，当然也就是已经包括了拒绝了所有任何一切和我弟弟的婚姻相关的事宜，以及·他的婚姻是否应该平等对待已经生了个亲生孩子的另一房丈夫的事宜。
----Nov. 12th, 2018
11-11-2018 Confusion regarding "Exactly, how you got money?"
I heard this morning's broadcasting covered a foul play how a $4Billion (四十亿美金) being deprived by a mother of a portrait child. This $4Billion was the amount added up since 2007's $500, 000 (五十万美金) which has nothing to do with my $400Million medical plus $400Million living per year for five years which includes this fiscal year of 2019.
Some related stories I heard:
The featured rich had a car accident related surgery years ago, which had changed his appearance from obvious well-structured 3D Western to an obvious much flatter 2D Asian, he even got a famous portrait to record this transformational change in his life. This mother of his portrait child was the person who had brought one portrait child from China to present to him. I heard he was presented for four such portrait children, all do not carry his blood but resemble his famous portrait to the extreme. *3D (立体）2D（平面）
I heard confusion sparked by this morning's broadcasting is how I got my handsome money without any legal trouble. Well, my side story is all these what I already have written on my web blog which is my own money I inherited.
Related confusions are:
1: What taxes I paid for all these money which have accumulated for over $4Billion already?
My response: I heard all paid in full of investor taxes. Some said none of these paid-in-fulls are taxed in my name in IRS, not in the pseudonym names either.
I know for certain it has been clarified that those not-pseudonym-names do not own that taxed money nor the paying companies according to laws, I don't know what is the confusion but I know I am not expected to pay further taxes. And I assume it is the same for those spending I paid for my biological children and my both parents.
* According to the United States tax laws, that 5% I intended to gift my relatives and friends are expected for gift taxes from those gift-recipients. I am not expected to pay such gift tax for the accumulated over $4Billion paid-out I have received or am expecting to receive.
----Nov. 11th, 2018
我来美国之前有打过一个电话给我以前南京四中同班的潘莉，当时她是南京前线歌曲团的，我也就是告诉她我要赴美，没有其他的，更没有争执过。到美国后还未曾与她联系过。不知为何说我恨她。
我1996年到达美国纽约后身上还有一千七百美金，吃住当时不用付费，我也在一个月内就已经在餐馆拿学徒收银员的一千美金一月的工资了，一个月后就已经是美月一千八百美金的工资。我从未因为筹措美国路费而对她不满，一点都没有。我当时国内筹款很顺利，而且当时在国内就已经知道出国目的的筹款利息会很高（同币种，至少是1：1.5，高一点就是1：2，而且要在一年左右还清）。我是1996年5月拿到护照，9月拿到签证，10月1日左右的飞机票赴美。
我当初出国借的钱都还清了，按同币种1：1.5在一年半左右后由我父亲出面在1997年年底左右替我还清借款。是谁在说同学之间可以随便拿钱不用归还？我从来没听说过。
南师大附中的傅萍？1996我帮她卖过一次婴儿尿裤。当时她因为没有生意经验，开价很高，根本就没有任何销售提成可拿，她给我的进货底价是￥1.6，销售医院等的卖价才￥1.3左右，从医院小卖部购买是自费，价格更便宜。当时国内又没有什么富豪只在乎小孩撒尿用品的质量。她自己也知道当时的情况是能把她进的那批货给卖出去就很好（她开出的清仓价是￥1.46）。她当时一共就付了我￥1500，我以为是销售提成，我会再核实。我当天也已经按她要求，把送货单子包括还未收款的记录全部交给了她，她当时愿意自己催款，我是因为要忙出国所以也愿意少操点心。因为每个货箱的体积是1立方米，无法用自行车送货，也很难让药检所当时的司机帮我送货，所以都是由傅萍找便宜的三轮车送货。
----2018年11月11日
11-10-2018 What else about Nanjing ---- 与南京方面的矛盾（3）
----The high school I graduated from
Nanjing Teacher's College Affiliated School (南京师范大学附属中学) I graduated from in 1985, has been the No.1 school in Jiangsu Province where Nanjing is the capital city. Historically, Jiangsu and Zhejiang Provinces are both famous for talents population since Ming and Qing dynasties. which possibly is the reason this No. 1 middle school has been hot and popular for the education it can provide. This school has been famous for its 100% college-enrollment rate (including community colleges) as well
Since 1950 or so in China, a college student needs to transfer his or her city-registry into the school if enrolled for job-assigning convenience upon graduation, but this policy is not applicable to any high school student even if the high school can offer boarding convenience.
The high school I graduated from has been a boarding high school that can offer over 10% of its total 1800 enrolled students in any given school year, but it does not have the admission policy to enroll any student outside Nanjing city. Now, one can imagine this is the high school has the great convenience to enroll any associated from any city of entire China. And, no one would imagine who is also graduated from this same high school if a high school diploma or record is not required for a college-graduated job seeker or a colleague. Nanjing Fourth Middle School that I graduated from in 1982 (Junior high) has been a similar boarding school as well.
Obviously, this has been my situation: Tons of undercovered same school graduated are sharing some mysterious missions to co-fight against me.
But, what puzzles me is what has bonded them together? And how?
----November 10th, 2018
我来美国之前有打过一个电话给我以前南京四中同班的潘莉，当时她是南京前线歌曲团的，我也就是告诉她我要赴美，没有其他的，更没有争执过。到美国后还未曾与她联系过。不知为何说我恨她。
我1996年到达美国纽约后身上还有一千七百美金，吃住当时不用付费，我也在一个月内就已经在餐馆拿学徒收银员的一千美金一月的工资了，一个月后就已经是美月一千八百美金的工资。我从未因为筹措美国路费而对她不满，一点都没有。我当时国内筹款很顺利，而且当时在国内就已经知道出国目的的筹款利息会很高（同币种，至少是1：1.5，高一点就是1：2，而且要在一年左右还清）。
我当初出国借的钱都还清了，按同币种1：1.5在一年半左右由我父亲出面替我还清借款。是谁在说同学之间可以随便拿钱不用归还？我从来没听说过。
南师大附中的傅萍？1996我帮她卖过一次婴儿尿裤。当时她因为没有生意经验，开价很高，根本就没有任何销售提成可拿，她给我的进货底价是￥1.6，销售医院等的卖价才￥1.3左右，从医院小卖部购买是自费，价格更便宜。当时国内又没有什么富豪只在乎小孩撒尿用品的质量。她自己也知道当时的情况是能把她进的那批货给卖出去就很好（她开出的清仓价是￥1.46）。她当时一共就付了我￥1500，我以为是销售提成，我会再核实。我当天也已经按她要求，把送货单子包括还未收款的记录全部交给了她，她当时愿意自己催款，我是因为要忙出国所以也愿意少操点心。因为每个货箱的体积是1立方米，无法用自行车送货，也很难让药检所当时的司机帮我送货，所以都是由傅萍找便宜的三轮车送货。
----2018年11月11日
江苏广播电台系统什么时候开始才参与广播剧的制作播出？为何现在的矛盾似乎是”为何忽略江苏广播电台系统才是这个广播剧的创意制作单位“?
我所知道的，广播剧制作创意是在2004年的7月1日，所谈内容包括这一部真实剧将由美国广播公司Clear Channel的106.7FM波段负责制作及播出事宜。
制作以我为主要人物的人物传记型真实广播剧是因为我在当天自己出资购买了我自己从出生就开始记录的保安影带记录而引发。我当时认为很适合作为传记型真实剧的语音资料，我成为主要人物是因为广播公司同意我所自荐的我有平淡却内容丰富的生活经历，而且所涉及的语音资料是在被我所购得的保安影带记录里。
我参加那天的电讯会议是由我自己的信托律师所安排，不是由洛克菲勒家的任何人所邀请，会议所涉及的主要内容也都和洛克菲勒家的任何人无关。所购保安影带也是由我自己的信托所支付（就是由我今年（2019年）健康及生活费用给付的同一家付款公司所支付的），不是由洛克菲勒家的任何人所支付的。
听说我在南京四中的初中同班同学，当时在前线歌舞团做歌唱演员的潘莉在2004年以前就认识了Holly Knowlton是造成江苏方面对广播剧为何以我为主要人物造成误会的原因。我当时没被告知潘莉在场是我未向她打招呼的原因。当时在场的我的同学同届以及校友都很多，上医的，美国桥口大学的，等等，实在很多可能是我未被一一告知的原因。
----2018年11月16日。
Should the rumored man who seeded in my younger brother's marriage the same equal husband in his marriage?
My response: I have nothing to do with my younger brother's marriage. If that male should be the same equal husband in my younger brother's marriage is never my business. I have refused to be associated with my younger brother's marriage family, which of course includes no association with any matter related to if my younger brother's marriage should have another same equal husband because of a birth child.
那个给我弟弟的老婆下种的男人是否应该被认为是我弟弟婚姻里另一个应该平等权利的丈夫？
我的回答：我和所有这些人及事都是一点关系都没有。那个男的是不是我弟弟婚姻里的二房丈夫都和我无关。我早就已经拒绝和我弟弟的婚姻家庭之间的任何关系，当然也就是已经包括了拒绝了所有任何一切和我弟弟的婚姻相关的事宜，以及·他的婚姻是否应该平等对待已经生了个亲生孩子的另一房丈夫的事宜。
----Nov. 12th, 2018
南京第四中学，南师大附中所相关的：
我16岁高一那年在学校里“拍电影”过程，只有我们二班的男女生看见过，没有任何别的班的人。我们班女生对我态度一直很排斥，我也没在意过。因为和她们很少接触，都是上学来放学就回家，课间几分钟上上厕所外面转转就又上课了。
据说南京四中，南师大附中都是一些国家领导人的恋爱班底，和我可能是同届，同班或者就只是同校毕业。就算是同班的也从无交往，也就是她家里死了人甚至她自己死了她丈夫死了，都不会有人认为需要通知我一声，而我家里死绝了也不会和他们有任何交往的这种同班而已。可怎么就成了针对我的仇恨了？非的杀了我一家才能表达他们才是真爱？还必须从我这里拿钱以明确谁才是最爱，还不给就是不行？
都听到这些国家政府军队的领导人在广播剧里的明确宣言：身上都是长了个阳具，就是对你屁股没有兴趣，所以中华人民共和国不需要你，别指望你够资格打个电话给我。
我方敏的回应就是：我身上就没长出个阳具让你够资格和我要钱，我身上就没长出过一条阳具让你够资格向我宣布你居然长了条阳具操过女人。你们这群偷吃扒拿坑蒙拐骗的杂种货，有多远就滚多远，你他妈的以为你自己是谁啊？我就没长出个阳具需要摸摸你们操过的女人屁股，更不会需要你们这群婊子养的杂种狗屎。
都说我说话很粗鲁，那你说我还有别的的话需要说嘛？
我身上真是没有长了一条男人阳具，不会没了女人屁股摸摸就活不下去，请不要把我幻想成男人，没有了你们这些女人能得不行的屁股就没法过日子，否则怎么你们就认定你们自己是个女的，就凭着有女人奶子屁股就可以对我幺三和四的，这辈子肯定吃定我了？我身上真是没有长了一条男人阳具，我真的永远不需要你们，永远不需要。----2018年11月9日。
----2018年11月10日。
---- 和我父亲的有关的
1）童家母女据说是今天早上播出的一个聚焦。
她们是我们家住在鼓楼街时候的邻居，我们家住二楼，他们家住4楼，直到1990年搬迁分开。期间对我母亲王博贤态度从来都是话很少但始终友善，我母亲也知道童家妈妈是我父亲的大学同学，和我父亲都是在1990年左右就退休了，其后很少见面。童家妈妈是经常会和我父亲说我父亲实在太宠我的一个，但从来都是让我感觉友善，没打算建议我父亲给我来个家规伺候。
我听说童家母女今天早上所表达的观点是
I）方文海必须把北京东路的房子过户给儿子；
- 我的愤怒：为什么我父亲应该住别人名下的房子？我父亲自己的生活安全感为什么没人在乎？我父亲“2013年去世”时就没人在乎过他是否想知道他自己的女儿是否还活着。
- 我的愤怒：为什么我父亲不准拥有他自己挣来的一份退休财务保障？
III）方文海要是没死，就不准活着。
- 我的愤怒：是想要我替我父亲买的那一份401K退休金吗？这根本是谋财害命宣言！
至于她们担心我老说我自己有钱会让他们很麻烦，这就是他们多虑了。据说他们现在也是在美国生活，应该很清楚美国也就是一切遵守法律就可以，我说什么也都是我自己的法律责任了。
2）南京大学的方教授。
我从未听我父亲提起过这个教授，我自己虽在南京生活学习多年也从未听说过。最近听说这个教授，可能是因为他也姓方，而且可能和我有7等亲以上的血缘关系，对我的财产继承持“坚决就是不同意”的立场。我在网上查了一下，方教授是1938年出生，南京大学天文系1959年毕业留校的；而我父亲是1932年出生，1957年才入学南京大学天文系，所以方教授可能曾经以年幼之资做过我父亲的老师助教之类的。
据说我父亲在南京大学也是不良故事多多。当年我父亲上大学可能有工资，所以听到的都是对我父亲的抱怨，比如我父亲总是去学校会计室抱怨怎么又克扣了他的什么补贴或者别人又某明奇妙的提领了他的什么钱，我父亲总是嫌学校不给他分配单间宿舍等等，曾被南京大学作为不良退伍军人典范进行批评教育。
听说今天早上提到了“北京的前女友”是南大毕业，但不是天文系毕业的。我很奇怪这个方教授他们几个怎么会认为“北京前女友”的小孩会和我父亲有关？我已经听说她的第一个孩子可能和丁姓私人助理有关。我听说她是被丁姓私人助理（小学毕业文化）作为恋爱女友邀请并在晚餐饭桌上介绍给我爷爷认识的，我父亲当时在场听说后非常吃惊但未发一言，事后也未到处宣扬。当时丁姓私人助理的妻子小孩也都在场，她是和丁姓私人助理一家坐在一起，我父亲是和我爷爷一起坐在圆形饭桌的另一边。
我还听说方教授也和每月一万美金故事有关，这可能是方教授的小孩对我宣称我自己是爷爷信托唯一受益人所以有钱而非常愤怒的原因；方教授的小孩可能也是南师大附中毕业的，据说也是胆子大的吓死人。
财产继承及拥有权是由法律所决定的，是由爷爷的遗嘱所决定的。方教授一家为什么不询问法律是否他们一家的合法权益被我所侵犯？财产的法律拥有权不是我宣布宣布就可以归我所有的，财产的法律拥有权也不是方教授一家“坚决就是不同意”就可以更改的。我有钱没钱都和他们没关系，更何况国外也都承认我是有继承了爷爷们给我的信托，公司也都认可我的信托有投资份额是我被公司容让而可以自称自己“是法国投资者”的原因。英国名流名嫒在2015年圣诞节的“宣布拥有”没有法律上的效应，也是因为财产的所有权是由法律所决定的，任何一家公司的合法拥有者投资公司都不是广播剧的话筒或者中国政府出资英国名嫒挂名的“电视广告及滚动字幕播出”所任意更改的。
方教授一家都是南京大学的，南京大学是有法律院的，应该可以向方教授一家解释解释继承和信托的相关法律，南京大学也是有商学院的，也应该可以向方教授一家解释公司注册，公司所有权，及公司会计规章制度的相关法律法规的。
----2018年11月8日
11-09-2018 与南京方面的矛盾（2）
都是同一个爷爷的孩子，为什么不可以从这个信托里拿钱？
我的回答：因为这个信托是爷爷替我（女掌）一个人设立的。就像方智仁爷爷在香港替我设立的信托（即李家信托或李氏信托），方智仁爷爷已在信托设立委托书里写明是只给其长子方文海所出的女掌一个人的，所以包括我父亲方文海自己在内，所有方智仁的其他子女统统都是没有一分钱的份额。我所继承的其他信托也是如此同样明确指定了我是唯一受益人。所以，这个有着美国公司汇款每月生活费一万美金故事的信托也是我（女掌）一个人的信托，和我所继承的其他信托一样，都是其他所有方家后人统统没有一分钱的份额。
我方敏拒绝我自己合法继承的这些信托被偷窃抢劫洗钱，我的这些信托所投资国家的金融会计制度和法规，以及我的这些信托所投资公司的管理规章等等，都是所有方家后人统统都不可以从我方敏的这些信托里及所投资的公司里擅自用钱拿钱的原因。
“都是同一个爷爷的孩子”从来不是一些方家后人可以擅自从任何一家公司偷窃抢劫钱财甚至通过高科技抢劫洗钱而破坏社会金融及法律秩序的借口原因及理由，我方敏本人就这些情形报警也从未犹豫过。再次强调，我方敏是合法继承了这些爷爷替我方敏一个人设立的这些信托，从不是偷窃了什么方家共同钱财，我方敏也绝不是因此就处于欠了方家任何一个后人一分一毫的处境。
为什么这是南京方面的矛盾？国内外南师大附中毕业生对所谓“就是一定要拿到钱，就是不准方敏花钱，否则就不配说自己也是南师大附中毕业的”的认同及参与程度实在太高，实在是不择手段到了以疯狂来形容都不为过的程度。
听说过有美国财政部的华人雇员说不应该认为那几个4亿美金是方敏自己的钱而应该认为是付款企业捐款给所有人？南师大附中毕业的。
听说过波士顿地区的那几个华人政府雇员说方敏根本不配有钱的？南师大附中毕业的，和我还都是同班或同届。
听说过有个高调宣布就是敢用高科技电脑技术不允许包括美国社安署在内的任何机构给我钱的那个？也是南师大附中毕业的。
。。。
他们个个都是吓死人的就是敢哎，所以我也不会回避来问一句，南师大附中毕业的对方敏这份仇恨是什么原因造成的？我高中毕业后就没怎么回过南师大附中，与我同班毕业的那些人也很少联络，同届的就不认识几个。
我只知道南师大附中毕业的，以前大专还是免费教育那会儿，女生绝大多数都是大专毕业，没什么本事考上的学校又不怎么样，还整天傲兹傲兹自己是南师大附中毕业的，就是能得个不行，这在南京市是有名的，南京十中毕业的都没这样。我和我们班及我们这届毕业的接触不多，对这点不是太清楚。我和我们班的很多女生从读书时候起就谈不到一起是真实。
还有，就是造势说我妈妈就是不可能不需要人陪伴，必须签合同可以让这个那个住进我妈妈家里由我妈妈养着，处得好不好都得让我妈妈看着他们的脸色，花大把钱养他们一辈子。是不是指望和当年的丁姓私人助理似的，从要求一起吃个好一点的饭店晚餐开始，再想办法不准我妈妈爸爸用他们自己的钱，然后再想办法把我妈妈爸爸送进医院不准浪费钱治疗就可以把我妈妈爸爸杀了，把我妈妈爸爸的退休金给霸占了？据说这些都是当年我爷爷方智仁我奶奶毛爱妹的亲身遭遇。我爸爸当年要不是离开了家不在爷爷奶奶身边，他绝不会允许这种事情发生的；我相信如果不是我奶奶自己让我父亲年幼的弟妹误会了谁才是他们父亲，我父亲的弟妹也不会不管的。
我不是不希望我妈妈有朋友，欧美各国也一直都有付费旅游伙伴或者付费私人伙伴的做法，一切都是规矩，一切都是法律，对所有人的权益都有法律保障。我妈妈嫁给我爸爸就没看过婆婆脸色，更不需要找个祖宗在家里供着给她脸色看，我也不会希望我妈妈成天被气得半死的，我也不会不管。
我身上真是没有长了一条男人阳具，不会没了女人屁股摸摸就活不下去，请不要把我幻想成男人，没有了你们这些女人能得不行的屁股就没法过日子，否则怎么你们就认定你们自己是个女的，就凭着有女人奶子屁股就可以对我幺三和四的，这辈子肯定吃定我了？我身上真是没有长了一条男人阳具，我真的永远不需要你们，永远不需要。
爸爸妈妈：请保护好自己。
----2018年11月9日。
请转达我不愿被骚扰的意愿
Thu, Nov 1, 6:45 PM (8 days ago)
| |||
| |||
江苏南京师范大学附属中学高中部1985届毕业生，
江苏南京第四中学初中部1982届毕业生，
上海医科大学1990届毕业生，
美国康州Bridgeport University1999届或2000届毕业生，
以及所有你们的亲朋好友姻亲同学熟人同事：
我方敏是不是2004年在美国继承到我爷爷给我的钱，
南师大附中高中的刘凯车祸真相如何，
我和刘恺的矛盾：
1： 1996年，
2：1996年，对于药检所绯闻事件，
我的广播剧收入是因为广播剧内容是根据我的人生经历制作，
我方敏及我方敏的父母活着不会需要吃你们的一口米，
我方敏的生活里永远不会需要你们的仇恨，
----2018年11月1日。
11-08-2018 与南京方面的矛盾
听说了今天早上的播出，主要是与南京方面的矛盾。
我的不理解：
1）为什么会认定我弟弟会自愿放弃拥有他自己的血脉传承，而只想领养他妻子在婚姻期间与别人所生孩子？他妻子小孩是在2011年-2012年左右出生。
南京方面的不理解：
1）为什么不可以继承我替我父母所购买的退休计划？
我的回答：这退休计划不是人寿保险。我只是一次出资（而非多年累积）让我父母参与了类似401K的30年退休金计划的给付而已。是由我自己出资替我父母购买30年计划的，我还希望替我父母每人再买下一个三十年的退休计划。我也已经要求如有余款需退回当初购买时的付款账户。中国南京方面如此要求实在离谱，实在让我怀疑很多事情。
To my attorneys:
Is it possible to ensure "if there is any leftover in my parents' pension plan, all need to be returned to the original paying accounts." Those from China insist on to inherit any possible leftover has been ridiculous. I wish to buy my both parents a second 30-years plan each.
Min Fang
Nov 8th, 2018
2）每月1万美金为何不可以继续享受？
我的回答：因我离开中国，每月1万美金的美国公司汇款在1996年10月就已经永久停止。南京方面1967年-1996年期间所收到的完全是由丁姓私人助理自己决定给付的，既非美国公司给付，也非方敏给付。
南京方面难以理解，同为方姓，为何没有钱财继承份额? 我只想提醒一句曾经由中国的国家领导人在广播剧上以国家领导人身份对我方敏的某明奇妙公开痛斥：“什么钱，你能有什么钱？谁会给你钱？你父亲没有，你弟弟也没有，你的哪个爷爷为什么不给你父亲什么钱，不给你父亲的兄弟姊妹什么钱，就只给你钱？”
我已经回答了有关我的以及为什么这痛斥根本就是莫名其妙地精神病发作（我在2016年年头就已经开始在波士顿96。9FM上及自己博客上以单篇形式公开解释我的继承是怎么回事，我当时已经是入籍美国公民，虽然不知所继承的是信托但很明确都是美国当地历史悠久公司）。
现在请问你，这些话你能回答吗？你能说这根本是某明奇妙吗？如果你认为你也应该有个信托，就请明白在你的父亲你的爷爷等等统统都不是信托受益人的情况下，你的信托和我的信托不可能相同。你是否有信托以及你的信托你的钱在哪里我完全不知道，我很确定我是我自己信托的唯一受益人，我很确定我的信托我的钱里没有你的一分钱。
----2018年11月8日。
11-07-2018 是欠债应该还钱还是某明奇妙的在绑架敲诈勒索？
就像我昨天提到的我自己愿意的5%帮亲朋的钱，只要是税后合法收入又不做犯罪用途就可以任意使用一样，就算华人不认为我说的这四亿美金生活费用给付是我自己所继承的钱财，只是不知什么人愿意给我钱花，只要这是合法给付又不是中国国库出来的钱，那里轮到中国政府气势汹汹就是不准我方敏花这笔那笔钱？如果不是中国政府努力居然就是公然不准我花用这笔那笔非中国国库的钱财，就算我没有男人，我都已经在2014年底就应该收到4亿美金生活费用足够可以找个如意郎君过自己乐呵日子了，哪有时间会像中国政府所指控的那样需要在2015年开始痛骂中国政府来挣美国政府的救济钱？
你有什么钱？什么钱都不是中国中央及各级地方政府的中国国库钱，中国财政款，
谁会给你钱？谁给都不是中国中央及各级地方政府的中国国库钱，中国财政款。
昨天提到南师大附中毕业的各个好象和我都是仇人，其中，我弟弟婚姻中的妻子所育小孩的亲生父亲本人或其亲戚的那些南师大附中毕业的可能是从2010年女方怀孕就开始了。当时我还在麻州波士顿的洛根飞机场，当时的运动简直是要让德尔塔航空公司罢工才能解决这些员工“坚决拒绝替姐姐做工，只愿替弟弟做工”的呼声，据说当时的解决办法就是只有让他们这些人先辞职，然后等到几十年后现投资人因退休而变更之后再决定是否会向该航空公司求职，当时据说还去了德尔塔公司驻该机场的地区经理办公室，情绪激昂的要求地区经理表态是支持弟弟还是只认姐姐，而这个姐姐当时在该机场的公开身份是无业游民，也就是国人俗称讨饭的，所以听说当时的德尔塔航空公司的地区经理听的是莫名其妙，表态只承认德尔塔航空公司的有效股票证书的合法持有者。
提到我做无业游民那段经历，这可能和麻州波士顿当地一些南师大附中和我同班同届以及其他届毕业生对我的负面公开表态有很大关系。其实整个过程，我就从未讨过一次，最多就是借款（为给我当时开始生病的猫女儿妹妹治病，需要上百上千的美金），也都表态今后会还。都是有这人那人自己坚持一定要给我钱，我还老嫌给的钱太少，不够在中国成买好一点的午餐吃，就是只够买买午餐盒饭广东馄饨面啃啃卤鸡爪之类的，晚餐就只有去这家那家教堂的免费餐了，否则就不够。我是成天叽里咕噜有时还怒气冲天的嫌钱太少，把一群一群的波士顿华人“凭什么，凭什么”的气到半死。其他的无业游民也是类似气到半死。我老是固定睡在一个既安全又有遮挡的好地方，其他无业游民和我抢地方，我就打，他们气的叫警察清场，我就去旁边的波士顿公园转了一圈就又回来睡下了，完全无视警察“不得跨越”的警戒线，还一人独占了整个地方。该地方就在波士顿中国街旁边，就又把波城华人”凭什么”的气到半死。当时的我和现在的我就我老是没钱花的立场态度及表达都是一致的，就是“王八蛋，老是不给我钱花!"。2004年7月1日那天，我做无业游民期间的吃住都已经做好了安排，都知道2004年7月1日谈到过我可能会睡在那里，那块地方就是安排给我睡觉的地方。
谈到高中同班的刘凯可能因为我经常和她出去玩却从不想到一起付帐，就从我购买飞机票的钱里扣了我三千元人民币，那价钱实在是太高了点。我从未吃了她那么多东西，甚至可以说是非常有限，出去吃饭由她或者韩冬掏钱又有我在场的，最多就几次而已还是街边小摊小饭店之类的。她自己当时已经有个一岁到两岁的孩子要养，到哪也都是带着她自己的孩子，既没什么余钱，有钱也都是花在她自己孩子身上，我能花到她多少钱就真是没什么好讲的了。
另一个学校，就是上海医科大学了，因为是名校，所以我大学同学里也有很多是从名校高中毕业的，家里亲朋同学在中国外交部工作的可能也很多，但2004年以后似乎也都是视我为仇敌立场。据说是因为我大学三年级和同班的李健泽去北京游玩的钱未还，认为在从不是恋爱关系的情况下，我的这种做法很离谱。
我当时是这件事情没处理好，应该在把钱还完以后再任性“就是不和他啰嗦，省的别人说我和他谈恋爱”。我对此的气愤就是，我当时不是为了赖账，就只是任性的不合适。我至今就不知当时花了多少钱。主要是火车票，住宿和吃住，都是李健泽付帐，我从来没问过。还有就是一条白色的连衣裙是花了五元钱买的（没打算让他花钱，所以捡的是我自己肯花的价钱买的）。当时是三年级暑假出去玩的，五年制还有两年大学要上，就算我当时四年级秋季开学的时候身上钱不够，都还有3个寒暑假可以回家拿钱还账。我三年级暑假出去玩之前是把当时那个学期所剩下的所有的钱都交给了李健泽，认为家里按常规给的生活费钱400元应该足够，没从家里特别多带钱上学，那个学期紧一点只够还100元左右（50元每月加上一点备用款，400元秋季学期，500元春季学期)。就算当时李健泽对我莫名其妙态度很气愤，坚持在那个学期必须一次还清，我也就是坐趟6个小时的普快火车回南京家里和我父母要钱还账。这些同学当时如果认为我的做法不合适，为什么没有或友善的或愤怒的告诉我应该把帐结了把钱还上。直到毕业，就没人给过我账单，毕业以后就把我说成这样？
听说南师大附中毕业的，上海第一医学院毕业的，都很愤怒我每学期把我父母给我的钱包括备用款都花的尽光，可他们是我父母还是亲生父母哎，这关他们这些同一个学校毕业的什么事？中科院大专院校家属，谁家孩子上大学不是如此计算给付生活费用？哪一家家长指望孩子假期回家居然还上交余款？我开学上学要乘特快，假期回家只买得起普快车票，所有国内国外上大学的，那个不是如此？
就像我昨天提到的我自己愿意的5%帮亲朋的钱，只要是税后合法收入又不做犯罪用途就可以任意使用一样，就算华人不认为我说的这四亿美金生活费用给付是我自己所继承的钱财，只是不知什么人愿意给我钱花，只要这是合法给付又不是中国国库出来的钱，那里轮到中国政府气势汹汹就是不准我方敏花这笔那笔钱？如果不是中国政府努力居然就是公然不准我花用这笔那笔非中国国库的钱财，就算我没有男人，我都已经在2014年底就应该收到4亿美金生活费用足够可以找个如意郎君过自己乐呵日子了，哪有时间会像中国政府所指控的那样需要在2015年开始痛骂中国政府来挣美国政府的救济钱？
你有什么钱？什么钱都不是中国中央及各级地方政府的中国国库钱，中国财政款，
谁会给你钱？谁给都不是中国中央及各级地方政府的中国国库钱，中国财政款。
你们有谁知道，南师大附中85届高中毕业的那个华健，家里是讨饭的还是妓院的？好像都是她的南师大附中朋友坚持认为我父亲方文海应该为他们家的孩子支付抚养费用，估计就是在要我为我父亲母亲购买的退休保险，我父亲放在家里的存款钱已经被我弟弟全部归他自己了，从未向我告知。他们哪来的这逻辑？只要是个男的没下过种没摸过屁股也必须付女人屁股钱？还不给就是不行？他们家从小就那么穷啊，不讨钱就吃不起饭养不起孩子的？读书时都以为她是高干子弟家里经济优越叻。
----2018年11月7日。
11-06-2018 经历如此北极酷寒，点滴心头滋味依然自在做自己
我曾经在这博客上提到，等我收到我自己的四亿美金一年的生活费用给付，我准备放5%在一边，如果我的亲戚朋友之类的有点难处，或者想试试能不能从我这里解决点提高标准的想法，可以自在一点，而不是费尽思量如何开口才是合适。我反正就是这么多钱每个月放在那里，一分钱都不超出，亲朋怎么开口对我而言都是“我看5%还有没有，有就拿去，反正不是给你就是给他或她，没有你就得等下个月了。”一点压力都没有。
可能有人会很奇怪，“你还会有亲朋？都当你脑子有问题才会继续认为自己很有钱，那些男的都和你没关系了。所有你以为能打个电话的，都已经公开私下宣布表态不会和你有任何交往了”。
据说波士顿华人圈子也是认为我现在已经很老实了，也就是没见我满大街找人吵架了，也就没那么气势汹汹耀武扬威的了，但也不再搭理人了。。我自己本人态度是，今后也是这态度立场，我又不是甲亢症患者，没人骚扰的情况下，确实不需要满大街的抗争；再者，我虽在波城待了十几年，也没有什么华人友善朋友，所有也不需要自作多情当别人都很尊重自己需要友善回应以示互相尊重。我今后离开波城，也是会如此以一个过路人而已的态度在各地中国城或华人餐馆商店购物就餐消费等等，会不会去中国得看是否安全能有保障或者是否已被真实宣布拒绝入境了。
至于那5%，我还是会放在一边，因为是缴过投资人税之后的税后收入，支付给任何用途也就是看我自己高兴了。我本人1）不希望被讹诈，2）不愿意资助犯罪用途。除此两点，也就不会需要亲朋就资金可能的用途提供过多解释了。
至于谁是亲朋，这是一个很大很现实的问题。我的父母如果还活着，也是经历过了北极一般冰天雪地的酷寒，点滴在心头，不会在乎是否还需要和善看待华人以示互相尊重。我是唐太宗李世民的真实的血脉传承的继承人，但请永远别把我当成华人的什么亲人什么后盾，我已经永远不是，我只会在乎我自己的私交华人朋友。我是我爷爷们的血脉至亲，他们最在乎的永远是我方敏本人的幸福快乐健康安全。我所有的爷爷们，我父亲及我自己都没有亏欠华人什么而引发如此强烈仇恨。我对八九年学运处理建议从来不是屠杀学生从来不是仇恨学生有当年会议记录作为事实证据就已经足够。
就我所知，父系母系的五等亲以内，全部都是一副“你他妈的算老几”的态度立场，谈不上友善。据说我父亲的弟妹三家人也已经公开表态不再会是亲戚。我本人态度是2004年所愿意赠送的那份礼物，他们如果确实像他们所公开表态的那样拒收，我也不会勉强。我本人没有偷窃他们任何钱财是真实是事实，所以我也不愿意因为只是想感谢他们2004年以前的亲戚立场却让自己变成了似乎是我偷窃了他们的钱财才亏欠了他们的处境。至于其他那些父系的二至五等亲，我确实没见过他们甚至没听说过他们（三等亲以上的那些），所以不太在意他们立场，只在意他们是否在过去这几年的所作所为伤害过我本人或者我的父母以及究竟到了什么程度。
我母亲的兄弟姊妹，据我听说，全部都是痛骂我方敏是从小撒谎从小不说实话还居然敢把（继承的）钱放进我自己的钱包而不是放在桌上让他们随用随取，还都是明知我是从出生起就随我父母生活由我父母提供衣食却一副我欠了他们的抚养费用未还的态度立场。我本人对他们的态度是，我没有欠了居住在江苏南京的王博真夫妻两人任何抚养费用，我更不会欠了我母亲那些居住在其他省市的其他兄弟姐妹的任何抚养费用。我母亲王博贤从十一二岁住进王博真家里开始，就是做王博真夫妻两人的住家女佣挣到她的自己衣食住行，从未被王博真夫妻两人抚养。如此，我也就只会在意我母系五等亲以内是否在过去这几年的所作所为伤害过我本人或者我的父母以及究竟到了什么程度。据说国内十年前已经登报声明过我和母系五等亲以内已无任何亲属关系，我本人不太清楚是谁处理的，我会问问清楚。
我以前在国内国外上学工作的那些同学同事，我也就是只会在意他们是否在过去这几年的所作所为伤害过我本人或者我的父母以及究竟到了什么程度。我高中毕业的南京师范大学附属中学的一些人就和疯子一样，似乎认定了我的钱他们就是可以拿应该拿，还一副“你他妈算老几，这钱那钱拿了用了又怎么了？”的态度，我本人立场也很明确：“你他妈的又算老几，我就是一定扭送你去警察局”。
据说我这一届南师附中五班有个女生华健（“公厕门外一元”有了个南京当地的可能人物），下几届据说有中国国家李姓总理的亲戚男生，方姓七等亲以上男生等等，中国外交部那是一堆，不知这些是否都是南师大附中的毕业学生认定就是够资格抢劫钱财的原因。我现在都已经是全中国都知的中华人民共和国的敌人，可能是因为1）中国共青团中央（北京）是我父亲所工作的中科院及所毕业的南京大学一些他认识的人的小孩，2）江苏共青团是南师大附中毕业的，3）上海共青团是上海小贺的朋友。
上海医科大学2000年并入复旦大学后就有了两校合并的生物医学工程专业（以前一直是合作关系）可能很清楚什么是脑控癌技术及其可用于谋财害命的潜力，以及免费向海内外中国人提供的对我方敏人格所做的“就是下贱就是烂货就是喜欢被虐待”的所谓医学心理分析定论，估计都和每月一万美金故事有关，因为我父亲的两个妹妹当年的婚恋经历听说就是这个待遇，所以我说我可能已经是丁姓私人助理一家想要掠夺财产的方家第三代受害人了，要是没有什么原因，丁姓私人助理哪里会这么自信就因睡了我奶奶几次，就直接把我爷爷奶奶亲生的孙女每月一万美金生活费给扣下了，一点都不担心会有什么事，那一万美金进中国当时可是由中共中央特批的。
我听说的，“就是下贱就是烂货就是喜欢被虐待”的方家第二代的可能受害故事
- 我父亲的大妹妹结婚是由丁姓私人助理做媒，但做丈夫的一直说他另有小孩一事，女方家里一直很清楚；结婚后双方长期分居且生活费用自理，只有每年的两个星期休假（包括一个星期的火车交通时间）直到做丈夫的退休才从四川回到上海生活。但我父亲的大妹妹收到了我爷爷给的一万五千元人民币，所以她的儿子可以说是由我爷爷方智仁出资养大的。
- 我父亲的小妹妹第二个孩子的父亲以前就是恋爱男友，但被丁姓私人助理劝说要找个实际点的老婆而离开；和我父亲小妹妹有了小孩以后，坚持每月发工资交给我父亲小妹妹一分钱以强调这一切都是我父亲小妹妹自己坚持一定要这样的。我父亲小妹妹的婚姻也是由丁姓私人助理做媒因为我父亲的小妹妹就是嫁不出去，所以只好找个中专毕业的有人嫁就很好了。我父亲的小妹妹没有收到我爷爷给的一万元人民币，据说只收到一千元人民币，而夫妻又常常为这个小儿子争吵，丈夫就是不肯为小儿子的费用付钱，所以她的小儿子是她自己一手养大的。
我本人很实在，是朋友不需多言，不是朋友我也不愿被讹诈。至于质疑我是否有钱，我本人态度就是我有钱没钱都和华人大众无关；至于是否还有旧识可以被称为是亲朋，我本人态度就是随缘了，他们是不是还是亲朋都是我自己的人生我自己过。
至于5%，我可能会用网络表格方式让我的亲朋和我联络，只需大致说明亲朋关系以及所需要金额用途以做轻重缓急的安排，不过只有等我收到四亿每金一年的生活费用给付我才可以放5%在一边，否则我自己都不够用。我会公布联络方式。
----2018年11月6日。
11-05-2018 中国外交部的“就是不同意”
听说了今天早上播出内容，英国东印度公司的法国投资公司出面说明我方敏自称是英国东印度公司的法国投资人是他们所容让的真实，听说了中国政府外交部的一贯立场“就是不同意”，也听说了美国方面的咨询“是否谁都可以这么自称”，所得到该法国公司的回答是“只有（你们问到的）这同一个人方敏可以这么自称。”
10-11-2018 为什么是我一个人的钱 && Why Trust-inheriting
据说中国外交部在广播剧上最经常的表态就是“就是不同意”。
我说我有合法继承钱财，中国外交部表态就是不同意；
我说我是这些信托的唯一受益人，中国外交部表态就是不同意；
我说我现在已经是美国公民，我是按照美国中国英国的信托及继承相关法律这么说的，中国外交部表态就是不同意说有钱，就是不同意说是唯一受益人。
我除了连蹦带跳，连嘶带吼，直着嗓子说“他们不同意？！他们不同意？！”，其他能做的也就是只有报警处理。
为什么？
因为我是不是在美国继承到合法财产，以及我是不是唯一继承了财产的人，都不是什么中国外交部中国政府同意或者不同意的事情，这些全部都是财产的法律所有权所决定的事情，也就是说这是美国的法律事务，牵涉的我的一些中国公民亲戚的，也就是中国的涉外法律事务，而非什么中国外交事务或者中国的内政事务。中国政府的这种表态，势必在海外华人社区对我方敏造成负面影响是我报警的原因。
中国国内的以及外交部就是不理解为什么的一些人，来看看下一个例子，你们是不是能明白一些。
******
我说中国外交部驻欧美各国的领馆工作人员的婚姻配偶，如在所驻国家生活，一般都有当地的合法居住身份。
这是不是个可以由那些也想在国外生活的中国人民所不同意的说法？
假如，他们就是要在国内报纸上公开表态，说这是贪污腐败，他们就是难以明白为什么在中国人民已经坚决不同意的情况下，中国外交部的这些驻外人员的婚姻配偶居然坚持就是如此居然还实际拥有海外合法居住身份。听到如此公开的代表着中国人民的愤怒表达，国内中国人民，国内驻外人员，各自会是如何反应？（海外华人很清楚）
假如，还有更讲道理的表态说，“我不是在要求你们帮助解决我作为中国公民海外生活的身份问题，我是在问你们，我自己的，我自己的，我自己的海外合法居住身份，这是我自己的身份，我自己的东西，你们凭什么就是不给？” 听到如此公开的代表着中国人民的愤怒表达，国内中国人民，国内驻外人员，各自会是如何反应？（海外华人很清楚）
再听听以下说法是不是类似：
中国政府外交部对我坚持自己有钱的表态基本上是，全中国人民都已经不同意方敏有钱了，美国政府美国的广播公司也非常配合，保证不让任何人听见方敏说她自己有钱，方敏居然自己弄了个博客天天在网上写她自己有钱，美国政府居然还说要捍卫法治国家保证她有钱。所以你们都听到了在美国的华裔所做的高调宣布，宁可他们自己犯法也要用科技手段不准我方敏收到钱，就算那是美国政府美国社会安全局寄出的钱或支票都不准。（广播剧上所宣布的都是公开的代表着中国政府的愤怒表达）
对我方敏有钱这件事情的很讲道理的表态：我不是在问你要你的钱，我是在问你我自己的钱在哪里，我自己的，我自己的，我自己的钱，不是你的钱，你不可以就是不给。我的回答一般是：你从没告诉过我你把钱藏哪儿了，我根本就从不认识你，我就只能想象你自己的钱一定藏在你自己的肛门里，你自己才会给忘了藏哪儿了。（广播剧上所宣布的都是公开的代表着中国政府的愤怒表达）
******
你们再听听，如果中国外交部坚持就是一定如此公开表态说，就是不同意我说自己应该是有小孩，就是不同意我说自己可能有婚姻（因为孩子不会是非婚生），居然还坚决就是不同意，（这态度也就是除非亲手摸到，操到我孩子父亲才会同意了）。否则还能怎么理解。
还有，就是关于我是唯一受益人的说法，
方智仁1965年在上海去世时，有给他的二女一子每人一个银行存折及一封遗嘱。
听说了中国司法部已经查了，目前没有查到1965年去世的方智仁是否在海内外另外留给了他自己的四名子女任何信托或者任何钱财，也已经查实了我方敏是方智仁1948年所设立信托的唯一受益人。
我的曾祖父就是方智仁的父亲，早在1930年就去世了，他的子女也就是我爷爷兄妹三人，是在他们三兄妹共同的亲生母亲照看下分到他的家产。
方家一些后人就是不信他们自己没钱，就是不同意我是这些信托唯一受益人，才闹成现在这个样子。我就一直强调财产的所有权是由法律所决定的，我是唯一受益人是由每一个爷爷的这每一份遗嘱所决定的。
实事求是问一句：他们认为是哪个爷爷有可能会在他们都还没出生，而且都不知会不会有他们这些小孩生在方家的时候，就留给他们一笔钱？有什么特殊原因让他们坚定认为至少一百多年前就已经去世的那些爷爷一定给了他们一笔钱？
----2018年11月5日。
11-04-2018 The reasons why I am in such a financial poverty situation
Attorneys: Where my Trusts are registered is very important to say I have inherited money.
Not when my Trust paying out as decided and on time. It is purely private legal matter when I can receive my providing as expected. Plus. I already contacted law enforcement when I thought I inherited some companies in 2004 but Os insisted on to claim theirs. I can't receive all these paid-out is the reason for my current financial situation.
----November 4th, 2018
Law enforcement personnel who are not on the case: Your Trusts have been registered owned by the U.S. Convoy since 1965 is the reason that those paid-outs should not be your money.
It is rumored all my Trusts have been registered to be owned by the "U.S. Convoy" which is the United States since 1965, which means all these paid-out since 2004 can't be my money. I heard it is explained already that "U.S. Convoy" is the U.S. Treasury Department and these Trust-Registry are also in the same U.S. Treasury Department. Well, if the Trust-Registry is explained has been in the U.S Treasury Department since 1965, it is obviously explaining that is not valid Trust-Registry. Trust-Registry should be Justice Department's registration record.
Also, Trust-Registry is unduplicatable which is similar to the commercial company's ownership registry, this means it is impossible to have two registries regarding one Trust, if the registry information has the same name, same settler, same year but different beneficiary person registry for a Trust, there must have some confusion about if two registry is about the same Trust.
----November 4th, 2018
Some husbands: "If you want to be my friend, you have to let my wife be spoiled as she prefers" which means taking over my money.
Well, I was never asked me if I wish to be such a friend, I gave my answer here:
I refuse to be such a friend to any husband.
Exactly, why I need to be a friend to such husbands? Some said it is for the convenience to have a sexual relationship when he is already having the preferred romance choice he calls his wife, but I have very hard time to understand how the Senior-aged husband could possibly be assumed my preferred sex choice when there is obviously no compensation for the husband's senior age but only big financial loss to me because of his willingness to spoil his wife? Exactly, why would I need a senior sex partner to worry if he would get a heart attack in every single second during his only quickie-capable participation? *rumored it is loudly announced on the radio "not even quickie-capable".
Let's excluding this sex partner illusion to evaluate the necessity to be such a friend to such husbands, why I need to be such a friend to such a husband who is determined to spoil his wife's determination to take over my money as the friendship condition? The answer is I have no reason at all.
So, I say loudly that I refuse to be such a friend to any such husbands.
----November 4th, 2018
11-03-2018 日本侵华，八国联军入侵，以及我还是不是个华人
日本侵华：
我对二战期间日本军队卓越表现的欣赏，而我本人又是南京人，据说在国内引发我对中日战争态度如此，是否被人花钱指使？我的回答：某明奇妙，无稽指责。
我来试试这么解释是否容易被大众所理解：二战期间的中国周边地区形势。
因为我继承的是信托，在国内外引发了遗嘱继承，分家产继承和信托继承之间究竟有何区别的广泛关注；现在又听说据说按照欧美国家的法律，就算是抢夺得到的财产，只要这些财产没有任何人可以继承，这些财产也是可以在主人被杀后就可以合法拥有。这更是引发广泛好奇。*其实按照欧美法律，抢劫财产，谋财害命都是刑事罪名。但确实有无主的房屋是可以被住户（就算是破门而入的住户）所合法拥有的法律。我本人不是太清楚法律条款区别。
二战期间的中国周边地区形势。
中日战争是1937年开始，再加国共两党之间的国内战争，可想而知，中国当时的富豪是如何希望安全转移自己的金银珠宝。他们当时如果是将这些金银珠宝转出国外托人照顾就是在办理财产的国际信托了。现在来看看当时的中国富豪可以考虑将财产转移去哪个国家：
北部：
俄罗斯：《列宁在1918》这部电影就是在说苏联是在1918年已经实现共产主义，财产转移过去恐怕就是被共产了，而且当时苏联是在和德国开战。
日本，韩国等亚洲北部国家，不是已经和日本苦战，就是快要开战；
东南部
菲律宾，马来西亚等东南亚地区，也是要么已经和日本苦战，要么就是快要开战；
西部：
印度巴基斯坦（当时是一个国家），英属殖民地，基本上不受日本的战争威胁。
还有，
香港，澳门也是英属殖民地，基本上不受日本的战争威胁。
台湾当时已经是日本殖民地。
现在大众可能可以明白为什么前几天是由英国司法当局出面解释二战期间及国共内战期间（1941-1949）的一些中国富豪在海外所设立信托的如今下落的一些疑问。
再进一步，日本是一个国力有限，人力有限的岛国，却可以让整个亚洲众多国家如此苦战多年，直到1945年美国在广岛投放原子弹才由日本天皇宣布战败。我在2004年认为日本军队在二战期间的军事卓越表现不可否认，是完全出于军事策略理论探寻的观点，完全不牵涉是否在否认日本对华发动的是侵略战争。
我本人是对二战期间日本军队有着卓越军事策略表现的观点的第一人是我的终身骄傲，但这完全不牵涉是否在否认日本在亚洲各国所发动的是侵略战争。
有关八国联军入侵中国：
目前已知的，爷爷们替我所设立的信托有在葡萄牙，西班牙，英国，法国等等投资，这些国家当年入侵中国，我所继承信托的投资在当时是怎么回事？我的信托所投资的这些公司没有参与。
我在中国上中学时从历史课上所知道的，八国联军入侵中国是为了强力推动鸦片类特殊生意。
我所听说的，我的信托所投资的公司，都是类似英国的东印度公司，做各种贸易但不是特殊贸易（鸦片贸易归属特殊贸易）。英国的东印度公司当时在印度做香料茶叶纺织布料生意，非常红火，当时有意开拓中国市场作类似生意，中国丝绸，中国香料（花椒，丁香类），中国茶叶等等，但没有参与鸦片类特殊贸易。葡萄牙的也是已经经营各种贸易多年也很成功，也没有参与鸦片类特殊贸易。
当时的英国东印度公司，虽然拥有公司自己的武装力量，但我在网上查过，英国印度两国都认可当时的英国东印度公司武装力量是由英国的国会（Parliament）所领导而非东印度公司自己是事实。葡萄牙的公司也是类似。
至于我的信托所投资的这些公司所缴纳税款被这些国家用于战争用途，这不是我的信托所投资的公司可以参与决定的。就像中国各级公司所缴纳的利税，都是由中国中央政府决定所需军费额度及军费如何开支，所有按照税法缴税的公司都没有可能参与这些决策。
以及我还是不是个华人：
听说很多国内国外的华人都感觉我已经不再认为自己是个华人，所以在我的博客上如此痛骂中国。
我本人只会感激一千多年来所有帮我尽心照顾我爷爷给我的这些信托的所有人，我本人只会用美好的语言来形容自己的利益被法律所保护着的感受。这不是因为我是个华人选择了在美国生活，而是因为我是所有这些的受益人。
我在2004年继承信托时，从未鄙视中国或者华人，我是2008北京奥运会开闭幕式创意人是事实，广播局所报道的我对中国大城市的地铁建设，中国的沙漠治理，苏州的建设发展，以及台湾面板行业的发展等等所作贡献统统都是事实。
我本人自2004年开始就一直在麻州波士顿公开痛骂海外华裔社区，
所谓“为所有女人的幸福而奋斗“就是以此为号召让所有女人和我方敏个人作对让我方敏个人悲惨，根本就是在忽略我也是个女人是事实；
所谓”为所有华人的利益而奋斗“就是在以此为号召让华裔社区对我方敏个人进行踩跺骂砸让我方敏死绝拉到，根本就是在恶意忽略我方敏也是个百分百华人是事实。
我方敏在2018年上半年就已经发表公开声明强调自己活着不需要吃中国华人民共和国的一口米，死了也不会需要中国人民共和国支付丧葬费用，就是因为自2015年中国人民共和国是以中国外交部，中共中央政治局的名义资源对我方敏进行公开谩骂造谣抹黑，甚至以中国人民解放军为武力威胁实施敲诈勒索谋财害命。
我方敏是美国公民，百分百华人血脉，但永远拒绝被任意践踏来作为自己被认可是华人的条件。我是不是华人不需要被你们认可，我的父母已经生我为华人，生我为唐太宗李世民的继承人。我已经公开声明我不需要你们中华人民共和国，我不需要你们海外华裔社区，这已经包括我不需要你们的认可。
我不需要你们来相信我说的话，因为我从来都认为是你们自己赞同我的观点才会是你们愿意聆听的原因；
我不需要你们相信我有钱，你们信不信都是我花我自己的钱过我自己的日子。
那些华人参与过脑控癌治疗的，他们都是已经经历过，相信不相信愿意不愿意，都是在看着我每天花钱。
等我收到我自己的生活费，也是如此，你们愿意不愿意相信不相信，都是我过我自己的快乐舒适生活；
等我遇到我自己的美好如意郎君，也是如此，你们愿意不愿意相信不相信，都是我和我的年轻英俊美好如意过我自己的快乐甜蜜恋爱生活；
我不需要你们相信我有钱。我有钱没钱以及有多少钱，都是法律所有权，从来不需要你们认可我才可以说我自己有钱。
----2018年11月3日。
11-02-2018 中国政府组织的广播剧”宣布“演出的得益者及受害人
听说了今天早上的播出，总算是听到了“习近平在血缘上不是毛泽东的小孩”这种事实的说法而不再只是“已经宣布两个人很像亲生父子啦”。
2015年开始由中国文化部，中国外交部，中国宣传部所组织的广播剧演出就是因为如此这种”就是要宣布“然后就是"已经向公众宣布了也坚决不会纠正所宣布的说法，就算不是事实，（你们）就是一点办法都没有"而产生的矛盾。
有实际好处的“宣布”演出：
六个男的真名实姓宣布一生深爱同一个外语学校的老师小程（音，或是陈），且都有难忘的美好性生活，这个小程老师在国内学过工商管理，所以，这个外语学校的小程老师就成了中国政府李克强总理对内对外推荐不回避是其骄傲妻子，中国国家主席习近平人前挺胸的其三十多岁唯一儿子的亲妈，就是如此有着”被宣布的杰出经济才华的中国经济的重要领导人才”。
如此“宣布”演出的受害者:
六个中国国内的无名男子以诚实语调宣布实在是不知道当时在美国已经快二十年的方敏能有什么才华会有什么成就贡献，再加上中国总理李克强的强力愤怒宣布“方敏就没有可能会有什么才华，就是不可能相信方敏会有才华”， 从此事实上的北京2008奥运会开幕式闭幕式创意人方敏，就被中国文艺界普遍认为是假冒伪造。方敏在美国的科技及其他成就所挣的智慧产权收入也因此在中国政府的强硬支持下，在美国华裔广泛参与支持下被大规模必须提领（2016年后有至少80亿美金如此“她是假冒伪造，中国政府已经宣布了“就必须被提领，其中包括八大部电影参与创作费及其他）。
就此，我方敏对真名实姓参与如此“宣布”演出以赢得真实利益并在意识上已经实质践踏了中国自己的相关法律的中国国家主席习近平中国国家总理李克强的痛骂就是如此在我的博客上真实被记录了。
------2018年11月2日。
关于康州硚口大学毕业的上海人马一茜（Tracy Ma, Tiffany Ma），华人社区有很多说法。
我的回应：2004年7月以前，我经常去她家里做客不是因为恨她。而是当她是个可以一起聊聊天的，但绝不愿意让她到我家里翻箱底的这么一个人。我当时从未听说过串婚，也打心眼里不赞同她的婚姻观，她的方姓丈夫虽也是籍贯宁波镇海的上海人，但我当时从未听说有此亲戚(现在听说也确实没有血缘关系)，她丈夫也是马一茜向我介绍是她丈夫的，所以我是在2004年6月份在新洲一对夫妻都不是上海人的大学同学家里提到马一茜小孩一事，但从未向她丈夫举报，因为不是她丈夫朋友也确实不知该如何处理才合适。
2004年7月1日据说有提到马一茜，因为当时的美国移民法改革，她的方姓丈夫虽是美国公民但不能帮她解决美国居留身份问题，我当时挺乐意帮帮她解决她的身份（现在听说她的身份是别人帮忙解决的），但不乐意给她丈夫一笔钱。据说有些华人对此很愤怒，我就很奇怪，我当时是马一茜的朋友，我就只愿意帮她解决一下她的美国居留身份却会愿意给她丈夫一大笔钱，为什么呀？想让她丈夫把她当垃圾给扔出去啊？我当时并不恨马一茜，我为什么会这么处理？
很多人说，如果马一茜在2004年7月以前对我还是很友善，我为什么在2004年6月把她说成那样？因为确实就她的婚姻观对她有看法。我是听马一茜自己说她丈夫对她有多好，我是听马一茜自己说她是自己如何坚决愿意和以前的男朋友分手，就为和她的丈夫可以正正经经结婚生孩子的，我是听马一茜自己说她的丈夫如何愿意做两份餐馆工让她可以不用出去做工的 , 我从未像很多女人对马一茜不用出去做工很反感，就是因为我是亲眼看见是她丈夫自己的态度是他自己很愿意他自己多苦点可以让他自己的老婆小孩舒服点，然后我是自己发现原来她的小孩不是她丈夫亲生的。
就是因为我确实因为她的婚姻观对她本人有很多负面看法，平时很多不会说的与我无关的小细节，那天的负面态度也都体现了。但我当时很清楚，就算我对她有很多负面看法，她的婚姻问题还是不应该由我介入，2004年7月1日那天我当时还是乐意帮她解决身份问题让她不用依赖婚姻。
2004年7月底我搬到麻州波士顿后，马一茜对我当时在摩根大通银行工作的恶意仇恨宣泄似的干扰是我从那时起就不再和马一茜交往的原因，马一茜在我2007年1月离开摩根大通银行之后持续不懈的仇恨表达是我永远认为马一茜很恶劣的原因。
所谓的上海心理学界对此的一些解释，可能是基于他们都是上海人很清楚丁姓私人助理1967-1996年的家庭财务如何优越，而非对于已经远在美国多年的我方敏有多少了解。
11-01-2018 Why Chinese community is so daring? 以及致所有和我同届毕业的一封信
Why the Chinese community is so daring? Is it only the Chinese community in the United States so daring to use computer technology to prevent any money transfer to me even if it is from the United States Social Security Administration? I heard this determination is what announced in this morning's broadcasting.
I graduated from a prestigious high school in Jiangsu province which, of course, a lot of shining prominent stars should be expected, I just don't know why it is everyone's efforts from that school to kill me because I dare to say I have inherited rich money which should not be allowed, and if I can't be stopped me to keep saying so, I have to be killed in order to prevent me saying I have inherited rich money lawfully. Why is this?
I heard all these frustrations expressed by those same year classmates, or same year graduated are all about I can't claim other people's money, but have they heard the explanations given so loudly that money ownership by law is the reason I have rich money lawfully?
致所有
江苏南京师范大学附属中学高中部1985届毕业生，
江苏南京第四中学初中部1982届毕业生，
上海医科大学1990届毕业生，
美国康州Bridgeport University1999届或2000届毕业生，
以及所有你们的亲朋好友姻亲同学熟人同事：
我方敏是不是2004年在美国继承到我爷爷给我的钱，以及我是不是确实很有钱，从来不是因为你们30年前和我曾经共坐一间教室就可以成为事实真相的权威人士的。请相信，在美国，财产的法律所有权是由美国司法部所捍卫的，我宣称自己很有钱且不愿在中餐馆挣生活费用，一直住政府楼食粮食卷，用教育部的学生贷款念MBA，还一直在等美国政府相关机关寄钱给我使用，都是我在此博客从未回避的话题，是否这些行为牵涉到违反美国法律甚至涉及犯罪都是应该由美国司法部侦办处理的，实在是不需要你们中的一些人自己志愿自己乐意就利用流言蜚语公共传媒来私设公堂捍卫你们自己的错觉。你们从来无权擅自侦办，从来无权审理，更从来无权非法做任何权威裁定。请你们这些人自重。
南师大附中高中的刘凯车祸真相如何，不是远在美国的我有可能知道的，我也从未参与任何有嫌疑制造车祸的行为。广播剧制作组制作播出与刘凯相关的内容，但不可能是她车祸的制造者。请将你们的任何疑问向中国公安部，江苏省公安厅以及南京市公安局提出。
我和刘恺的矛盾：
1： 1996年，我通过傅萍所购的来美国的飞机票往返票价是1万元人民币（在美国所退的回程票价是200美金）, 据说是刘凯建议，已经不是朋友（如果是我误解，请纠正）。刘凯1996年所借出的3000元人民币，我通过我父亲在1997年还了4500元人民币。
2：1996年，对于药检所绯闻事件，刘凯所持观点及强硬立场做法，已经不是朋友。
我的广播剧收入是因为广播剧内容是根据我的人生经历制作，提成所得比例计算等等全部依据美国相关法律，不应被视为刘凯车祸的赔偿基金。我已经听说你们认为广播剧有播出和你们相关内容，你们就应按广播剧利润比例提成的观点，我也听说了广播公司已经向你们解释过你们的观点不符合美国的相关法律，如有任何疑问，请向你们自己的律师咨询。
我方敏及我方敏的父母活着不会需要吃你们的一口米，死了也不会需要你们支付丧葬费用。
我方敏的生活里永远不会需要你们的仇恨，我方敏的生活里永远不会需要你们。
----2018年11月1日。
10-31-2018 A dissolved Trust is an unclaimed property or an equivalent to a no owner house
I heard this morning's broadcasting is impressively saying I am a resident of a hostility State, which is after the hostility expressed by the city officials I am a resident of several months ago, all because both believed I have no money of my own but insisted on continuing living on taxpayers' money, and no matter how popular the reality radio program based on my life stories had been, somehow both agreed there should not be my share at all in the money it generated which I called it major featured person fee. This was the story I was told about this morning's broadcasting. And I know for certain Boston's Chinese community has this understanding about who I am. It is rumored this morning's Boston Chinese group are the same year graduates from the same high school (南师大附中) that I graduated from in 1985, not the first similar group broadcasted this similar opinion on this same radio program, nor the only school I graduated from.
Regarding if the major featured person fee should also pay to all these people that had been in stories that associated me with classmates, etc, I know for sure it is all according to the United States laws that regulate reality show's producing, broadcasting and related. I heard the radio company has already communicated all these law-related to all those who are interested to know how much they should get paid because of this radio program's success. Please direct all these confusions and anger to the producing company for explanations.
Regarding the shared true honest understanding among them that I am a useless person to be associated with and it was years ago, I respond with true honesty as well "the same is the vise visa".
The hostility:
Well, I said about killing to de-own a Trust is some group of people's fantasy to get money that I am not willing to give. How exactly is this possible? Is this me exaggerating my situation? Well, if one knows once the beneficiary or beneficiaries are no longer alive would cause a Trust to be de-owned(dissolved) as an unclaimed property or No-owner property, one won't deny what won't be a difference to eliminate a sole beneficiary or the entire beneficiary group when the public killing is propaganda on the public media as "nothing wrong but death executed".
The background:
In the United States and a lot of Europe countries, a no-owner real estate property can be owned by an occupant even that is the result from a break-in, an unclaimed property can be auctioned to be distributable fund negotiable among government agencies. A company owned by a Trust is an organization equivalent to a property which can generate yearly distributable fund.
The pieces of possible evidence:
Now, do you think I am exaggerating if hearing all these people who don't allow me to spend my own living expenses providing are also the people who tie themselves to be so closely associated to the investments of my Trusts that I claimed? Isn't my intellectual incomes have impressively been understood as "can be owned by refusal to return or the refusal of the continuing payment to be stopped"?
Also, the way how private Assistant Ding's children had tied themselves through broadcasting to F's and R's as the seems-eligible-for-ownership-confusion group. I have accused private assistant Ding may be responsible to my grandparents (both) death when they were both not allowed to spend their own money by private assistant Ding's relatives when they were hospitalized in 1958 and 1965? Those relatives are the producers of this radio program for some time already.
The rumored logic:
The rumored propaganda has been some money-wanter group may throw someone a penny if this someone can help them to get billions. The logic of all this is "who cares about your money after you become a dead body no matter how you express your unwillingness?" which I responded with who cares why you want the money but why it has to be you who own that money and this will be till your death day.
The assumed plan:
So, I assume their plan is "Just do this or that no matter how ridiculous or illegal anyone may complain about, no one can do anything about it because everyone is already well-positioned to ensure so". Well, I say I already complained to the professional law enforcing people even though I don't know if well-positioned also covers them as well. At least, I am still very comfortable to speak up what pisses me off and I am still very comfortable to be quiet.
The further possible reason:
I chose to live in Boston during my anxiety treatment, it is rumored that Massachusetts' anger has been why I did those upgrading in JPM Chase's tech center in Massachusetts which has caused a lot of troubles to Massachusetts. I don't know about any troubles I had caused to Massachusetts by upgrading computer technology for a company, but I understand the confusion is from that fact I did not do anything related to improve banking industry's computer security but all these nobody-needed changes and related confusion that these upgrading made malicious efforts can be customer-ordered.
My answer to this type of confusion is: Banking industry has tons of talented people experienced enough on facilities security that if all these specialty knowledge can be helped by those computer technology upgrading to be applicable on virtue banking facility (internet banking) as well, I am and I was too green to do more on securing the banking industry's information system facility.
My answer to the related confusion is: the same also applies to anti-malicious efforts.
----October 31st, 2018
10-30-2018 Some "not realistic" concerns from the Chinese community and more about JPM Chase Change
This morning's broadcasting which is rumored still broadcasting in some radio channel somewhere if not NYC, it is announced that I am expected to be handsomely shopping-capable without cash or a credit card.
I heard it is broadcasted as, for in-store shopping, a cashier can discount me with the manager's instruction or with the store's security tape of me purchasing the item together with the receipt. I personally totally don't object this privilege if the store employee is willing to offer this privilege to me, but I promise I won't complain as well if the employee feels more comfortable to consult the store manager before relying on the store's security tape as well.
Also, I heard it is announced if anyone willing to offer me real estate treat, the General Attorney's office needed to be contacted because I won't be the person paying the rents, which would be obviously true enough before I finally receive my handsome yearly providing. And I won't hesitate to move-in once I receive the moving authorization letter from BHA or the General Attorney's office because it should be based on appropriate arrangement made to cover rents appropriately, but I won't move in with my chunks from my current residence because my current apartment should have already paid in full was the 2004's deal I remembered, and for over 50 years is what I heard of.
If I can get above privileges, I will be the happy one. "Not realistic" won't be my concern.
Ok, now is the confusion expressed about the blog article regarding JPM Chase change I wrote. Well, a technology person who participated that change in Lowell, MA has commented in this morning's broadcasting that he only recognizes the spreadsheet table is authentic true account for what happened, but not everything else. Those are too stretchy and don't make any sense.
Well, I started laughing when I heard this comment, obviously, I have not graduated from the MBA education yet. ( 09-07-2018 The Sweeping Change of Technology Upgrading in JPM Chase )
The link is the article this technology person complained about which was my effort to recall what happened in JPM Chase as an MBA student with a technology background, "doesn't make sense" stated the obvious that my blog article failed to communicate something clearly between "what to change"(the spreadsheet table) and "how to change" which was the change process that I did not participate as a manager but as a part of the human resource efforts. Some said it may be because I was not an employee who never participated in any town hall meetings organized by the tech management that were related to this changing process.
This blog article started off as my homework for course MBA503 Organizational Change, which emphasizes this change's impacts on the organization instead of the computer technology academically. In MBA, an organization's change always has "what need to change" and the change process of "how to change". In this article, I was recalling the JPM Chase's technology upgrading I participated from viewing it as a successful organizational change, not just some technology events.
I heard misunderstanding about this organizational change experience was mostly about how this change can increase business opportunities relates to enhancing computer security that I was invited to take a look at on July 1st of 2004. The answer is: Any security enhancement is a customer-order on security which needs to be fulfilled exactly as requested to achieve the objective of the highest level of security that technology can offer. If improving quality control on developing web applications or software is the necessity to enhance security on the network & information system, why not increase some business opportunities by offering customer-order web application(software) to improve business clients' experiences as well?
----October 30th, 2018
10-29-2018 Trust Entity, Trust Inheriting and No-Owner Trust
Li's Family Trust company in Hong Kong, a lot of times, I am asked if this is the company created by the Trust my grandfather set up for me in 1948? I heard it is confirmed as "there are at least 6 such companies created by a Li's Trust that set up in the 1940s are now operating their business in the Hong Kong area, which company?"
I heard, in this morning's broadcasting, both my great-grandmother and my grandfather had named each's Trust set up for me as Li's (Family) Trust （李氏（李家）信托）. So, I am associated with two of such companies, I heard my grandfather's is the biggest one, both as the sole beneficiary person. I heard my great-grandmother had conditioned my inheriting to provide my father a living as he desires which proved to be my full-heart pleasure before I heard of this Trust, which was the reason I quietly inherited it (1941 with 60,000 Dayang) without the reading. (I also heard the real truth is no such condition at all from my great-grandmother.)
Well, with all these sole-beneficiary Trust-inheriting, what will happen if a situation does happen but no next-kin inheriting as well according to my own will? I expressed my own willingness as "No-owner is not an option either" in a will-letter to the U.S laws. What this means? It means I am free from the horrifying rumor of "government agency(agencies) can conduct murder to de-own a Trust in order to get some money". It means it is according to my will that no any government nor any organization can own any money from any of my Trusts as no-owner wealth if a situation happens.
So, how will I provide for my father who is a book-nuts to my great-grandmother, to satisfy my great-grandmother's wish to let him live happily in his desired way? Good health insurance, comfortable living as I have already provided since 2004. I was complained about not emphasizing it is my father side grandfathers' blessing that I am providing for my parents, and I am willing to stress that but not knowing how yet. My father is not the person can handle financial stress which I heard is the opinion I share with my great-grandmother. So, my thoughts are to lower my mother's dress-providing level to the degree that is a match for their 10 years age difference in their appearances. (My father already earned his allowance difference with my mother which is much higher as a retired Science Academy scientist versus a retired level 1 accountant).
Also, about sayings how I disrespect my grandmother. It is nonsense to say so. She was my grandmother no matter what marriage issue my grandfather complained. I heard my grandfather died with a broken heart by such news at his deathbed that three out of her four children are not even my grandfather's blood, which already says what situation I have to deal. I do what is necessary to clarify that, my Trust inheriting, and my relative-gifting to my father's siblings, both have nothing to do with such rumors. And I state here that I heard private assistant Ding was the only affair my grandmother had which was 8-9 years after she already had been sharing four children with my grandfather. It was my grandmother who confused my father's young age siblings about their blood. I never disrespected my grandmother.
----October 29th, 2018
10-28-2018 Promoting the New Era in Software Developing is the reason I have been abused?
I heard my yesterday's blog article has triggered a lot of discussions if my personal experiences are saying that the United States government sector also has this if Constitutional doubts, well, I heard a lot of very impressive co-operative efforts to abuse me are from those who heard of the big secret that I am announced a State Enemy to the United States since 2007 on the radio program "undercover-ly" which means the audience doesn't know it was me that being announced a State Enemy if not an insider. This entire time, these people have been wondering how long it takes to eventually evict me from the United States or if my complaints are the results of being executed penalties accordingly. I heard the reason I am announced a State Enemy was because of the computer technology upgrading I promoted in JPM Chase between August of 2004- January of 2007. I have a post stating it is ridiculous that this organizational change of computer technology upgrading that happened in JPM Chase was somehow misunderstood as some sort of very destructive political movement, I repost its MBA Force Field analysis table below which listed reasons to change in the column of "Forces drive the change" and what changes I promoted in the column of "To reduce forces resist the changes". The score column represents the change item's priority level in my understanding.
The objective of the JPM Chase's change between 2004-2007 was
To change software developing from the status quo of
"expecting the Business take-in whatever is developed by the technology"
to the new era of
"requesting the technology to develop software exactly as the Business requested or as the Business' customer-order."
About another impressive group, the R names, well, possible related rumors are:
1: The rumor "the mother married to the father at the same time when the daughter married to the son" is possibly the description of how influential the mother is to the father. The mother is one of the "Pejoves" who have been confused about the "Pejoves" Fund company's lawful ownership, plus if the father's $500,000 daily spending is to spend on me or to donate to the special donation program.
I say to the mother please direct your confusion to the "Pejoves" company and the father. It is very annoying to hear so many "hold it" to the money that I lawfully own and am in need to use.
2: The same equal Chinese Yu families have been all around them.
It is rumored that the Chinese Yu families are biologically related to my grandfather's former private assistant Mr. Ding's birth father. I have to say this private assistant Ding is possibly my family's bad luck or even a curse ever since he was hired.
The Chinese Yu clan is
- The same equal to all those confused families including some of Mrs. Rs' maiden names on the confusion of "why the providing has to stop?!", even though the Yu clan got the money by illegally detained my monthly living expenses providing for over 29 years (between July of 1967- Oct. of 1996), while those confused families were because of contributions to those companies' growth.
- The same equal to the British Royals because of the "real birth mother" of the rumored four biologically real British children, which is an un-verifiable but a very respected information nonetheless to all Rs.
- The same equal to the "Duane Reade pharmacist" because they are from the four generations already actress-actor family as well. If I remember it correctly, Mr. "Duane Reade pharmacist" is the legal husband to the mother and the legal birth father to the daughter listed in rumor 1, both mother and daughter are obviously very important to R names.
- The same equal wealthy to R's name because my Trusts' investments in R's family business seems already considered as "effectively taken over already" which can be heard from some Rs' confused anger of "Why all these challenges about the ownership power of R's family business?"
This entire time, I kept on saying I only met one person having the R's name, and the entire world felt with me that I have been chased after by the entire group of R names while I am financially handsomely independent has been at least in my own understanding, what could possibly be the problem?
The problem was rumored because I visited MoMA (a museum) in the big New York City in January and February of 2015, and my visits were seen by some Chinese which sparked the rumor if I had been a lover to its biggest donator, a late Mr. R. But I never heard of the late Mr. R at all which is a certain information to a lot of R names, and the late Mr. R himself certainly never suspected anything such sort of, but his late wife's children have been all very angry about it.
So, I clarify some references: The late Mr. R was the person invested in those movies and Broadway shows that I participated in the discussion on July 1st of 2004. The truth of what happened on that day was he was conducting his own investing business which I had complained as "totally impacted my investment share in those opportunities" since I heard of his name in this year of 2018. And that was all.
----October 28th, 2018
10-27-2018 Min Fang's response (方敏的回应）
1: Unbearable truly means no such need & no such reason at all for me to swallow it all to tolerate all these " To destroy you is the only presentation of such association because that is how you got this association" expression. （难以承受确实就是在说没有任何需要也没有任何理由，让我忍辱带愤的容让所有这些“摧毁你的一切就是唯一和你交往的方式，你不就是这么被时刻摧毁着才可以够资格打打电话之类的可以有点关系吗？”以及类似的表白。)
2: Infront of laws of any lawful country that has a valid Constitution, a citizen with a government office almighty should still be a part of the people not above the people nor led by the people. （在任何一个有着有效的宪法的法治国家，政府高官作为一个公民，在法律面前都应只是人民的一部分，“王子犯法与庶民同罪”，而不是高于人民或被人民领导着。）
听的懂中英文的都知道这一句 “She confused herself with the people(“她把自己等同于了人民"） 也就是”你他妈算老几，也就是人民一份子而已。(truly means "Who the fuch do you think you are, you are just one of the people")。
----October 27th, 2018
10-26-2018 Confusions and Anger from China (来自中国的困扰和愤怒）
1: Exactly, what money is Min Fang's own money that should be given to Min Fang by the U.S. government? （中文附后）
My explanation: This money is transferred from Min Fang's Trust's investment in the United States to the U.S. Treasury Department's financial service office to be transferred into my personal private account, with the financial service charge as well, as the agreement reached on July 1st of 2004 (not the official date). The paying companies have all been U.S. commercial products-providing or service-providing companies with retail or wholesale business.
Confusion from China has been if this money is actually routed from China's Central Reserve, the answer is Never.
In China, it is a common practice for a commercial company take-in some cash as its income and gives back a commercial receipt together with the remaining amount of the money after its service charge of such commercial receipt. In China's anger, confusion from the Chinese general public is if the money has announced to give to me instead of giving back to some unknown corrupted Chinese government officials. The answer is this is an incorrect assumption. In the United States, this type of activities is a severe crime, Federal and State, to all parties involved. The company involved would be charged with conducting the money-laundry crime（洗钱罪名）, the criminal charge against me would be "unknown source of money"(财产来源不明罪）。
This money that paying company provided are the profits from their daily business operations on the U.S. soil, such as selling goods or providing services. As the paying companies have testified, the paying companies are all upon each's lawfully registered investor-company's instruction to give me this money from each's profits instead of hand-in to each's lawfully registered investor-company.
2: Exactly, what is Min Fang's own money and what is Min Fang's Trust's money？
My explanation: I heard yesterday's broadcasting has explained why my same parents' younger brother or my father side cousins don't have any inheritable-share to claim in my willed Trust-inheriting, which is the explanation official given according to the People's Republic of China's inheriting laws and entrusting laws, as well as the United States' and Britain's inheriting laws and entrusting laws. This morning's broadcasting further clarified more confusion about money's lawful ownership.
So, according to each of my grandfather's will and according to laws, I am the sole beneficiary person to each Trust I inherited, why I only state my yearly providing is my own money? It is because my Trusts are all business entities that have been investing. All the money in-investing are in-investment-usage money that only the profits after business investment consideration can be for my personal usage. Once this profits money transferred out of my Trusts' business investing activities, it is entirely my own money because I am the sole beneficiary person of my Trusts. By the way, this is the same concept for the very common investor-tax in the U.S. and Europe -- Once the money out of business investing, it is the investor's personal income needs to pay investor-tax.
----October 26th, 2018
1：究竟什么是方敏自己的钱应该由美国政府交给方敏使用？
我的解释：这钱是由方敏的信托在美国的投资公司按照2004年7月1日（非正式日期）和美国财政部达成的协议转入美国财政部的财务服务办公室并支付相应的手续费用，由美国财政部负责转入我方敏的私人使用账户。付款公司都是美国的商务实业或者商务服务公司，都有批发或者零售经营的实体店面。
来自中国的困扰就是这些付款公司的钱款给付是否其实是来自中国国库的钱，回答：从来不是。
一间商业公司在收取费用后，将转入该公司的某一笔钱再转回给汇款者的其他账户并附一张该公司的商务发票，在中国是一种很平常的现象。来自中国的一片愤怒中，中国普通老百姓的愤怒是这些公开宣布必须给方敏的钱是否其实是从中国国库出来的钱，没直接转回给那几个匿名的贪官而是宣布给了方敏。回答：这是一种谬误和错觉。在美国，对所有参与人员和机构来说，这种做法都是严重的刑事犯罪行为。对于参与公司来说，是刑事洗钱罪，对我方敏来说，是刑事财产来源不明罪*。
这些付款公司所给付的钱都是由这些付款公司在美国领土上的每天或销售商品或提供商业服务等等的商业经营活动所产生的商业盈利中支付的。就像这些付款公司的作证说明，这些付款公司都是在其法律上有效注册的合法投资公司的指示下才将其应该上交给该投资公司的商业盈利分红转交支付给我使用的。
2：究竟什么是方敏自己的钱，什么是方敏的信托的钱？
我的解释：我听说昨天的广播剧播出内容，按照中华人民共和国，美国及英国的继承法和信托法，解释了为什么我同父同母的弟弟以及我父系的亲戚们在那些我按遗嘱所继承的信托里没有一丝一毫的可继承份额。据说今天早上的播出是进一步依据法律阐明谁才是哪些钱财的合法主人。
这样说来，按照我每一个爷爷的遗嘱以及按照法律，我是我所继承的每一个信托的唯一受益人，那我为什么只说我每年应受到的生活费给付才是我自己的钱？这是因为我的那些信托都是些经营机构一直都在进行商业投资活动。所有这些放在投资经营里的钱都是正在商业投资使用中的钱，就只有那些不作为投资使用的每年盈利部分才可以转出我的信托的商业投资活动，以作为我的私人给付使用。一旦这些钱转出我的信托的商业投资活动，因为我是信托的唯一受益人，所有这些钱就都是我自己的钱。顺便提一句，这和在欧美很平常的投资人税是同一种概念，就是某笔钱一旦离开商业投资活动，就是该钱的合法主人即投资人的个人收入所得需要缴纳投资人税。
*有关什么是财产来源不明罪，2004年1月时，很多人都听说我以前住过的曼哈顿那家人和我为一个房子的什么事有过矛盾。这个矛盾的起因就是我在2004年1月被调查我为何有钱买了一套70-100万美金的房子。我就没听懂怎么回事，一直以为是那家人以我的名字向银行贷款也不和我说一声，让我以后自己想贷款买房子都没有贷款额度。但我当时已经解释了那房子不是我的，那家人有钱可以支付其20%的首付。
----2018年10月26日。
10-25-2018 The Abnormalities Related to My Romances
Yesterday, I said in Chinese that rumored biologically real four Chinese British children definitely do not carry my blood. Reason? Well, if you have heard a miserable Shanghai girl died at age of 31years old in the 1970s, you can hear a lot of similarities in those featured broadcasting. Anything she wanted should be her cousins to enjoy or to give-out which including those males who she attracted to. She died with wrenched a heart and all her cousins' hate. In this rumored story, all were because her father set up a sole beneficiary Trust in Hong Kong for her in 1946 when she was only one year's old which conditioned her inheriting should be after she had a lovely birth child of her own. And Albert Gore's famous Chinese romance is rumored this girl's father side fourth cousin, now one won't feel surprised a bit why those four Chinese British children announced as Albert Gore's Chinese romance's first cousin's children yesterday on the public media and why I have publicly accused Albert Gore has robbed me publicly through the radio program's producing efforts.
The most horrible part of this rumor is Albert Gore's Chinese romance's maiden family and some other related families did get good sized money from that Shanghai girl's Trust after her death, because that Trust became a no-owner Trust after that Shanghai girl's death which became Chinese Foreign Department's negotiable with the British government, being her father-side cousins who have worked for Chinese foreign Department, Albert Gore's Chinese romance's maiden family benefited from the negotiation. It was rumored all Shanghai girl's cousins were not eligible for Next Kin inheriting to her Trust because they were the reasons for her early and miserable death. Now you won't feel uncomfortable to say "No wonder it feels like as if everyone is waiting for the Chinese woman Min Fang to be abused to death which has been announced so loudly on the radio, as if nothing should be wrong with it even in such a lawful country like the United States", and all these loud announcements were rumored announced by Albert Gore and his Chinese romance, obviously with the experiences and with the victory hauls. So, I expressed myself to the United States Laws as a citizen to the U.S. that I refuse to be a victim of such possible negotiations between any governments (governing agencies).
I also stated in Chinese yesterday on my blog that I have been really lucky that other than my romance has not been "normal" compared to others, I have been overall well enough which are factually true because I quietly inherited in 2004, my financial providing have been quietly paid-out on time as decided in 2004, and I have quietly enjoyed some of the handsome providings. And I am looking forward to enjoying my living situation changes soon enough, and to meet someone around some corners to get lost in his handsome eyes soon enough. Some would say I should add if I am, a victim or not, in the situation to move on, well, I say I am a polygamist.
Well, if anyone asks how "unnormal" my romances had been, well, the first one would be when I was in China, those males only had shown up only to tell me they had been interested in me and went disappeared immediately to get busy on their own dating if I did not dislike their interesting presentations, and showed up again 10 years later to repeat such interesting presentation and also did repeat the same "disappeared to get busy on dating without my involvement", and have expressed their agonies so loudly when the repetitive same presentations not producing the expected results.
The second would be why Rs' women have been so agitated as if they would be so threatened by me when my biological daughter already publicly announced impressively as (if) carrying F's name so long ago in 2011? Because I am a woman expecting the traditional polygamist male's privileges? but themselves are not the eligibles to have such an illusion.
The third would be those efforts to throw me a left-over male who is the father of some woman's child if not children already, and those efforts to confuse the public if I am even eligible to have a romance at all, etc.
----October 25th, 2018
10-24-2018 传说中真实的中英混血的四个小孩真的和我无关，以及其他
听说了有个英国的于家小姐替年轻的英国王储W生了（4+1）个小孩，难怪华人圈里一直说有4个真实的小孩。不过，你要是听说过上海的那个于家小姐信托故事，听说过那上海于小姐是如何喜欢上一个就被她的堂姐妹爱上一个嫁了一个或者推荐给了其好姊妹一个，又听说这个生孩子的英国于家小姐是阿尔伯特·高尔那个华人恋人中国外交部前雇员居住纽约的于小姐的一等亲，也就是在上海的于家小姐没孩没婚没任何男人爱而在31岁时就忧郁悲惨去世之后拿到了上海于家小姐的父亲替上海于小姐所设立的信托里的一部分钱的那些北方于家人中的一个，那你就知道不管这英国于小姐生孩子故事及其相关故事是真是假，确实没有我方敏可以说三道四的，也就是强调那几个小孩确实和我没有任何关系。
我真是很幸运了，直到2004年，除了找不到适合结婚的对象，我还算是安全，既顺利继承了信托也已经享受到了信托给付的医疗照顾。上海的于家小姐，就因为父亲的爱希望她能有个有爱的婚姻所定下的条款，连一分钱的生活费用给付都没有享受到。说到谈恋爱，我在中国遇见的几个，就是什么李克强（李政纲），小贺（贺国强), 等等，都是很奇怪的，在我方敏表达有兴趣之后就立即失踪了，过上十年八年再来露个脸看我没反感就又立即失踪了，在失踪期间的恋爱都是谈的红红火火的，现在方敏我知道其中原因了，原来是有个丁家私人助理一家可能在隐形操纵（据说丁家私人助理认识上海于家小姐的父系于家亲戚）。我还算是幸运，确实没认为需要他们这些老伙的一身老皮才可以够资格在人前晃晃，也没和他们多说几句话，所以确实也没因他们的失踪而悲愤而忧郁。估计也就因为我如此太不悲凉，所以这几个人对我这态度的愤怒是全世界都听到了“你他妈的算老几，把钱拿来！”。至于在美国碰见的几个，都是因为他们自己经历的原因。
现在，要是依据广播剧对我方敏的宣布，也就是纽约的于小姐以及其恋爱男友阿尔伯特·高尔，还有中国的李克强和贺国强的婚姻亲朋等等的高调宣布，根本就是上海于家小姐当年的遭遇，就是不准有孩子，不准被男人爱，不准有任何婚姻，再加上就只配让中国政府给杀了然后把钱归他们所有。可惜我坚决不乐意所以我就坚决持续不停的报警了。
我个人的一些看法及我听到的道听途说：
1：我就一直痛骂中国政府外交部的种种做法根本是一家妓院外交部，结果听说中国外交部在1949年，1950年大批雇佣了当时对中国共产党新政府的态度立场友善的妓院子弟（因为外交部的开明态度不会因其父母职业而妨碍他们成为国家干部），也就是说中华人民共和国外交部当年就是如此起家的。
2：我就一直很愤怒美国政府外交部在处理美国广播公司的广播剧事件上的“不见影子任由中国方面无理造谣诽谤谩骂“的立场，结果我听说美国外交部的华裔雇员是和中国外交部方面就此交涉的人员，而这些华裔雇员是中国五四运动时被学生痛骂的北洋政府那些人的后裔，他们现在都是美国这个移民国家的一部分。
*北洋政府是当时北伐军政府和清朝洋务运动政府的混合体，五四学生最著名的口号是“外争主权，内惩国贼.”。
3:我就一直奇怪为什么这个纽约的于小姐就是要定了那个由香港我爷爷替我设立的信托在2004年汇往美国的我的五亿美金。
据说是因为洛杉矶华人都知1965年的洛杉矶的于李两家就香港的李家信托应该归谁的争执而引发的洛杉矶华人大规模械斗早就让纽约的那个于小姐的洛杉矶于家亲戚赢得了香港的李家信托，据说是这个洛杉矶于家的孙子在坚称已经打赢了所以拥有了香港的李家信托公司。结果我听说这根本就是没发生过的事情。
我听说的是那个洛杉矶的李家和香港李家信托完全无关，（我还不太清楚我和李家信托是否有关），而香港方面也从未听说洛杉矶的于家父子找了一个洛杉矶姓李的打架打赢了就拥有了该香港李家信托公司的传闻，而洛杉矶的于家父子也没打赢，却是因为召集械斗并造成洛杉矶李家的人员伤亡而被洛杉矶警方给关进了监狱，据说于家的父亲死在了监狱里于家的儿子现在还在监狱里。
----2018年10月24日。
10-23-2018 Some power to "Drag you to death" is from the Chinese community in West Coast
It is well-known to the entire world that I have been a victim of a ridiculous Chinese government who insist on threatening me to demand money without any legal ground, I took every bit of those swears and blackmails that this 2012- administration of the Chinese government helped to broadcast worldwide through the American radio company to be intentionally malicious, but how this 12-hours flight-away government can be so almighty powerfully impact my life in the United States?
By the United States government's help? of course, one would imagine there would be some. But obviously, it has been emphasized the United States is a lawful country because I am protected by laws. Some of the evidence are: 1)I haven't been evicted from my current residence as well as the United States. 2:) I received the handsome medical treatment providing that I needed. 3) My living expenses providing have been in process of validating if lawful money, and first 3 years already have been clarified lawful. 4:) My 2004 inheriting has been validated lawful.
Also, with so many countries which includes Britain and France have declared their determination to stay as lawful countries, with the evidence that I am still the tolerated individual to be the most famous French financier of the most famous British East India Company, what could be the possible reasons that I can be so impacted by the may-be-very-evil Chinese government so far away?
I have stated some time ago that I am comfortably quiet now because I am protected by laws obviously, and I only have two major sources of own money which are my intellectual incomes and my yearly living expenses providing as a beneficiary to my Trusts. By the way, I heard the Chinese government's anger is why my intellectual incomes can be claimed by whoever but not them from China? I have to say it is illegal to claim-to-own my intellectual incomes in the United States and I heard what happened has been under law-investigation already.
But, with all my intellectual incomes already "taken" at the moment whenever any new incomes are available to be collected, why I am still under the pressure as if to be "drag to death"?
Also, I have denounced myself from the China and Chinese communities abroad in March or so this year of 2018, because being the heir to my ancient Tang dynasty Emperor grandfathers, all my grandfathers and my father and myself don't owe China nor Chinese communities abroad this hate that my father and I have experienced since 2004, but why still this pressure after I sent the denouncement letter to the Chinese government?
After I heard two "drag to death" stories, one from Shanghai, China and one from San Francisco, the United States, I started paying attention to who has this confidence that kills a sole beneficiary person to de-own a Trust can be a route to get money from that Trust. I kind of getting the impression this confidence is from the United States West Coast Chinese community, Los Angels and San Francisco areas to be specific. Evidence: 1) The Chinese director of this radio program, a rumored Boston resident currently, a fourth generation Chinese immigrant came from San Francisco area who also rumored participated such story. 2:) Current dragging-on powerhouse on radio program related is from the rumored 3rd or 4th generations immigrants from the San Franciso or Los Angels area. 3:) In that two "drag to death" stories, both rumoed victims were sole beneficiary persons to the Trusts set up in Hong Kong in the 1940s. 4:) Tons of Chinese rich person have settled in Los Angels and San Francis area after they fled China around the year 1948-1949.
----October 23rd, 2018
10-22-2018 Boston's Almighty Highness Magic 106.7FM radio station
Boston's magic 106.7FM radio station is the almighty highness radio station who so deserves to supervise all business in greater Boston area if I happen to be a client of, this has been my complaint to law people since 2015.
This supervision style is to keep an eye on my every move in that business including every interaction, even eye contacts, between me and the staff of the business that is under this radio station's so deserved supervision. It has never been just microphones all over the places but cameras.
I heard this co-operative under-supervision has been established by these business' public relation offices, in responding to this radio station's promoting radio program efforts. And this promoting effort radiate from Boston to every corner of the world by its global marketing team to anyone if curious about this radio program's major featured person. The promoting theme has always been: "That Chinese woman Min Fang is a never-wanted fake talent who has no money of her own and don't deserve any money at all from the radio program's over 10 years worldwide successful broadcasting as well, and don't ever listen to anything this Chinese woman Min Fang says." This morning, if you know the channel that still broadcasting the radio program, you should have heard all the reasons why they have been so dedicated doing all these to me after I have made so much money for this radio station's company.
In 2015, my income of major featured person fee from this radio program's worldwide broadcasting had accumulated to over $4Billion, the radio company's profits from this radio program have accumulated to over $12 Billion which does not include those other broadcasting radio companies profits. Till today, I have not received a penny but all these abusiveness in my life in Boston of Massachusetts and all those curses and blackmails you have heard on the radio since 2014.
I heard this morning's broadcasting was sparked by my yesterday's blog article of new treatment technology for Alzheimer patients which has already been available to commercial hospitals. One of this radio station's anchor host Nancy Quill has been dedicated to promoting Alzheimer's awareness, so I was accused that why I am the person announce such a great news on my blog which I responded with: "As if I am still eligible to contact anyone at all from this almighty highness Boston's Magic 106.7FM radio station."
I heard the reasons given by this radio station's staff in this morning's broadcasting are:
1: I spend Rockefellers' money in 2004 which is what they are revenging on behave of.
My response: I have complained about Rockefellers about this matter to U.S. General Attorney's office because I never intended and I never spent any of Rockefellers' any money.
2: I did not participate in producing efforts of the radio program is the reason I don't deserve major featured person fee no matter how profitable this radio program has been.
My response: The fact that my share is the same as the producing team was decided based on the fact that producing team would produce this radio program independently but based on my life experiences and audio materials I myself provided. Most of the stories featured before 2015 have been my life experiences before 2004 which were based on the abstracts from my own security tapes that I myself bought from an agency, not a security company, for a total of $400Million in 2004.
3: Being the radio station's staff, they know the truth of all these fake romances.
My response: Why they ignore the facts who are the liars told all these fake romances?
4: Being the radio station's staff, they won't tolerate me to spend other people's money in any place for any reason.
My response: In the United States, a radio station has never been privileged to be equivalent to a law enforcement unit. And I never spend other people's money. My horrifying experiences have been they stalk me everywhere I have any dealing with.
----October 22nd, 2018
10-21-2018 A five-minutes Alzheimer surgery and overnight recovery ---- Win back one-month precious space lost in current battle (老年痴呆(五分钟手术，过夜恢复)--就可以收复一个月的失地）
June 21st in 2018, a sunny Sunday, should be a happy celebration Sunday for every teary struggling person who is a caregiver to an Alzheimer family senior: The cure for Alzheimer is on its way. The rough timing is: the instrument's how-to related training for surgeons may need about a month, the frustration is any new order of the surgical instrument may need some longer time.
The greatest news is only a five-minutes surgery can dramatically takes-back the ground that has been lost in a month time in the current hard battle against Alzheimer, and even a severely progressive patient can recover from this 5-minutes surgery in just overnight time. This is such an affordable and so daily applicable surgery technology is the huge proud for the entire technology invention team.
This is the same or similar surgical instrument for new cancer surgery technology, the updates of this technology are the options of how to retain those biological cells in the local surgical area, please ask this instrument's manufacturing company about more information on this option.
最好的消息是就只要5分钟的手术就可以夺回目前治疗技术下一个月的失地，重症进行性病人也可以在手术隔夜后恢复一个月前的状态。这是能让老年痴呆的病人在经济上身体上都可以每天承受的一种手术技术，这项技术如此可承受是其所有参与研发人员的骄傲。
这是一种和癌症新治疗技术一样或者类似的手术设备，技术的更新是在如何选择保留手术区域的细胞，请向手术设备的制造商查询该选项手术技术的详细信息。
----(All the important information about new Alzheimer treatment is in above section)----
How I stick my neck into this proud of this new treatment technology for Alzheimer? It already has been such an anger to a lot of devoted cancer treatment researchers that I contributed curing cancer by suggesting conduct "several times of Hemodialysis after each surgery" to prevent spreading, how about this time?
Well, that suggestion of "at least three times of Hemodialysis after each surgery" is based on the medical college textbook knowledge from "Organs and Tissues" that any element in a cell will penetrate into body-fluid and then further penetrate into blood which means Hemodialysis (blood filtering technology) will remove malicious elements in blood, but it takes a couple of days for malicious elements in body-fluid to penetrate into blood, and more days for malicious elements in cells to eventually penetrate into blood to be removed.
It is very unfair to a lot of devoted cancer research personnel to watch my name associated with curing cancer by this advice, but it is truly my advice that rings the bell for those frustrated cancer treatment providers about spreading prevention, "at least three times of Hemodialysis after each surgery" is absolutely needed and it is the advice. I am very proud that my textbook knowledge serves well in this curing cancer contribution.
This time, I put it very accurately as co-discover the option of how to retain biological cells in surgical local areas. Those other co-discovery persons are medical personnel, what I contributed is I advised them how to make complicated computer mouse-clicks to get the desired retaining selections, and a bit more.
I have a lot of trouble with a lot of people that I never even heard of keep yelling at me where is their own money as if I would know, which frustrated me that I kept addressing them as "Down syndromes" because they are too young to be called Alzheimer-s.
On a Sunday, I was jokingly saying I need some special attention on the "Down syndrome strip" when I went to a Walmart store in Quincy of Massachusetts, I bypassed a sign raising the awareness for Alzheimer-s. So, I was corrected that my attention should be directed to "Alzheimer strip" because my concern is not because of birth-defect. So, today which is the next Sunday, I have this article on my blog spreading the happy news of curing Alzheimer, and I will celebrate that I successfully stick my neck into this proud of this new treatment technology for Alzheimer.
----October 21st of 2018, a Sunday.
10-20-2018 Three Rules of Discipline and Eight Points for Attention（三大纪律八项注意）
The difference between communism and looting should be if to share self-own or if to grab others-own. Well, if the sharing is own wife, grabbing is whoever's "any kind of wealth", no wonder I am a no-sexuality female screaming this entire time. （共产主义和抢掠的区别似乎应该是愿意分享自己所拥有的还是只想抢别人所拥有的。不过，如果愿意分享的是自己老婆，想抢的是别人的“任何好东西”，难怪就我这个暂无性欲之女子整天在惨嚎。）
Since 1921, the Chinese communist party has been working on to differentiate communism with looting. All those Chinese riches who were lucky enough to survive in Taiwan may have complained Chinese communist party had been lootings through and through while Chinese communist party has been emphasizing “Three Rules of Discipline and Eight Points for Attention（三大纪律八项注意）*” for all its members to obey since 1927 or so. （从1921年中国共产党成立，中国共产党就致力于区别什么共产主义运动以及共产主义以及与抢劫掠夺的区别是什么。那些幸运的逃到了台湾生存下来的前中国富人可能是痛骂中国当年的共产主义根本就是抢劫和掠夺，而中国共产党自1927年起就已经三令五申的强调三大纪律八项注意是铁的纪律。）
---- October 20th, 2018
Reference：
*三大纪律：
- 一切行动听指挥；
- 不拿群众一针一线；
- 一切缴获要归公。
八项注意：
- 说话和气；
- 买卖公平；
- 借东西要还；
- 损坏东西要赔偿；
- 不打人骂人；
- 不损坏庄稼；
- 不调戏妇女；
- 不虐待俘虏。
（资料来源：维基百科 三大纪律八项注意）
“Three Rules of Discipline and Eight Points for Attention (三大纪律八项注意）”
An alternative, more literal translation into English was presented by the People's Daily.[2]
The Three Main Rules of Discipline:
- Obey orders in all your actions.
- Do not take a single needle or piece of thread from the masses.
- Turn in everything captured.
The Eight Points for Attention:
- Speak politely.
- Pay fairly for what you buy.
- Return everything you borrow.
- Pay for anything you damage.
- Do not hit or swear at people.
- Do not damage crops.
- Do not take liberties with women.
- Do not ill-treat captives.
(Source Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_Rules_of_Discipline_and_Eight_Points_for_Attention)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_Rules_of_Discipline_and_Eight_Points_for_Attention)
10-19-2018 More about anger：Anger from Chinese community（来自华裔社区的愤怒）
1 Question： "Money ownership should be according to Laws, then why you insist on to have that money?"
My answer： I explained that I inherited some Trusts according to Laws in 2004, the explanation about those providing money was given as "upon instructions from their lawfully registered owners according to Laws". Above explanations are both according to Laws about providing money which I have insisted on to have.
（1 华裔社区问：“钱的拥有权应该是根据法律的合法所有权，那你为什么一再坚持那是你的钱？”
我的回答：我已经解释了我是按照法律在2004年继承了几个信托，有关那些生活费用给付，付款公司给予的解释是：都是根据法律注册登记上的公司合法投资拥有者的指示按照法律予以支付”。以上两点解释都是根据法律，所以我一再坚持那些生活费用给付是我的钱。）
2 Question： "If that is your money, why I don't have a share?"
My answer：My Trust-Inheriting was according to wills so that I am the sole beneficiary to all the Trusts I inherited which definitely means no one else has a single share.
（2 华裔社区问：“如果那是你的钱，为什么那里面没有我的钱？”
我的回答：我的信托继承都是按照每一个信托的遗嘱继承的每一个信托，所以我是我所继承的所有信托的唯一受益人，也就是说就没有任何其他人的任何一分钱在我所继承的所有信托里面。）
3 Question： "Sole-beneficiary and Trust-inheriting are both your own saying which not necessary means lawful saying, and I don't believe any of them."
My answer： If you have doubts on your own possible inheritable share, please believe consulting attorneys about inheriting related laws is the best choice. I can only provide some obvious tips here: My both parents were healthy alive in 2004 and providing money I stated are all originated from outside China.
（3 华裔社区问： “唯一受益人及信托继承都是你自说自话并不一定是法律上的说法，我是一个字都不会相信。”
我的回答：如果你对你自己那一份可能的继承份额有疑问，请向律师咨询继承相关法律应该是你最好的选择。我可以提供一些非常明显的真实线索：我的父母双亲在2004年时都很健康也都健在，我所宣称的我的生活费用给付都是由中华人民共和国境外地区的公司所支付提供的。）
My frustration has been: Believe my explanations or not, all these providing money is the money no other Chinese has any association with. It has been too ridiculous for so many Chinese screaming to me about where their own money is while knowing I have no financial nor social association with them.
（我的愤怒：相信不相信我所给予的解释，就没有任何华人能和所有这些我所宣称的生活费用给付搭界, 却来了一堆和我既从无金钱往来也没任何社交往来的人对着我连嘶代吼的干嚎质问他们自己的钱在那里，简直是某明奇妙至极。）
4 Question： "Why you kept on insulting so many people and the Chinese government?"
My answer： I understand the entire situation and most of my troubles are from their intentional malicious efforts, so my answer-statement should be: I have been returning their "courtesy" as my own care-free expression, just my learning experiences of being my own way of witty smart.
（4 华裔社区问：“你为什么老是羞辱挑衅那么多人以及中国政府？”
我的回答：我认为整起事件以及我所有的麻烦都是由这些人及中国政府一些人明知真相而恶意胡言故意所为所造成的，所以我的回答应该是：我也就是在用着同样的毫不在乎地态度对他们所做的一切礼尚往来而已，就当练习练习我自已独特风格的“机智对应聪敏利齿”吧。）
----October 19th, 2018
Anger from other Communities（来自其他社区的愤怒）:
Question："You can't keep claiming other people's wealth to be yours to own!"
My answer：I claimed I am the sole beneficiary person of some Trusts I inherited. The confusion of these paying companies' lawful ownership is beyond my knowledge as a beneficiary person whose Trusts may have invested in these paying companies. Please consult those paying companies regarding your confusion about their lawful ownership, and please consult attorneys regarding your confusion about what Trust-Inheriting or sole beneficiary person is.
My confusion about one American company in 2016 has been corrected as that American company is 100% solely owned by its lawfully registered investor which is the British East India Company's British Financier.
(其他社区问：“你不能老是把别人的财产宣布成你自己的!"
我的回答：我宣称的是：我是我所继承信托的唯一受益人。至于那些向我支付生活费用的公司的法律所有权困绕，我的那些信托可能有投资在这些公司里，但这些公司的法律所有权并不是我作为这些信托的受益人可能会知道的信息。如果你对于这些付款公司的法律所有权有困扰，请向这些付款公司咨询；如果你对什么是信托继承及什么是唯一受益人有困绕，请向律师公司咨询。
至于我2016年时对一家美国公司法律所有权的困扰，我已经纠正了我的说法，其正确说法是：这家美国公司是100%由其合法注册的投资者英国公司所独家拥有，该英国公司是著名的英国东印度公司的主要英国投资公司。
----October 19th, 2018
10-18-2018 The anger from cousins and friendly (方家亲戚以及一些友好人士的愤怒）
From my cousins（亲戚的愤怒）:
1: Their family seniors were not cared for by me the same way as I cared for my parents.
My answer: My parents' marriage family is the poorest among my father-side relatives. In 2004, the understanding of my parents' health care was good health-insurance and some retirement pension which were both affordable to my father side relatives' own finance. In the meeting, the decision was they buy their insurances in China, and I gave them the gift of over $80Million in U.S. dollar in years later which would be around 2014 or 2015. They still have not received the gifts is beyond my control.
1：他们家的老人没有被我想我自己父母一样照顾着.
我的回答：我父母的婚姻家庭是我父系亲戚里最穷的一个。2004年，我给我父母所做的安排，当时的理解就是一个好的医疗保险及一份普通的退休工资，这些在当时就是我父系亲戚们自己就有也买得起的。在会上当时提到的就是，他们自己在中国买保险，我在2014或者2015年左右给他们一家一份超过8千万美金的礼物（即五亿人民币）。他们至今没有收到礼物是因为事件发展不在我的掌控之中。
My anger is I only receive a Trust of $15Million in 1948, and I gave them each over $80 Million which is 5 times of the total of the year 1948's size for each, why it is ridiculous for them to buy their own insurance for the time being? All either can afford to have good one or having good company-offered insurance, either small business owner (“个体户”自己做生意) or college graduated having a good retirement.
我的愤怒是：我继承的信托在1948年设立时就只有一千五百万美金（五百万大洋），而我2004年愿意给他们的是每家超过八千万美金（即五亿人民币）的一份礼物，他们自己付钱买一份他们买的起的保险怎么就变成离谱了？他们所有的人都是要么做“个体户”自己做生意已经好多年了，要么大学毕业有一份很好的公费医疗退休金。
Those Trusts I inherited were from my father-side grandfathers, my mother side relatives are not who I owe which is not to say they are not my relatives, other than my mother's eldest sister who had been nice to me before her own child-adoption which was when I was 12 years old. Her relentless fierce efforts after her own adoption to make her own home a clearly-owned place to her own adopted daughter had already pushed me very clearly in my own parents' place only, her husband passed away before 2004. So, as I stated early in my blog, as long as she had what she needed when she was sick, I am comfortable not being the one who should be around and I don't owe her family more than this because of her and her family's attitude towards my mother. My mother worked her food as a maid when she grew up in her eldest sister's place since my mother was 11 years old, but my mother was never a doomed-maid person to her eldest sister, nor to her eldest sister's family".
（我妈妈那边的亲戚，除了我妈妈的大姐，我是谁也没欠，这不是在说他们不是亲戚，而是说我继承的是我父系爷爷们给我的礼物。我妈妈的大姐在我十一二岁左右她领养她自己的小孩以前对我非常好。她领养了自己的小孩以后就坚持用各种方式强调她自己的家是她自己所领养的小孩所拥有的，她这份持续不懈的努力早就让我非常非常地清楚我父母的家才是我唯一的家，她丈夫是在2004年以前就去世了。所以，就像我曾经在我博文里曾经提到的，在我妈的大姐生病去世之前，她可以收到所需要的公费医疗以外的医疗以其他照顾，我就很自在，我不觉得我是应该需要亲身照顾陪伴她的那一个，我也不觉得我亏欠她家里比这更多就因为他们一家对我母亲的态度。我的母亲从十一二岁起是在她的这个大姐家里长大的直到我父母结婚，我妈妈必须协助独立操持家务才能有口饭吃是我妈妈自己的认知，那些家务事做得动做不动都是她必须做的是我妈妈告诉我的她的成长经历，我认为我妈妈是做工挣得她自己的成长伙食费，对我妈妈的大姐及我妈妈大姐的家庭来说，我妈妈并不应该被认为是他们家里一个“永远都改变不了地位的”的低贱保姆而已。）
2: Why I refuse to give them that "over $80Million in U.S. dollars" in 2004.
My answer: That is a gift, not I owe. I do have the privilege to decide when and how to gift. I have the concern that they would get into some trouble that already existed in that meeting which was so many ridiculous demands to have some money.
（2：为什么我拒绝在2004年就送给他们这每家超过80万美金的礼物。
我的回答：那是礼物不是欠债，我愿意什么时候给怎么给就什么时候给怎么给。我当时就是担心他们卷入当时在会上就已经存在的一堆某明奇妙的要钱要求。）
I said in that meeting I have this gift allocated for my father's siblings and my grandfather's siblings because they were relatives to me and my father, and I asked them to try not to get involved with those who don't have this kind of gift from me. Those are the people I never owe a bit. All these noises you heard that they deserve to have some money were in that meeting to bilk and fiercely demand money already, all behaved as if I owe them. They are the people I never even heard of till they harmed me, I never owed them a penny and I never owed them any kindness that ever from them. Why would I ever reward those people I never even heard of just because they dare to harm for money or they dare to bilk for money?
（我当时已经说了，我有这每家一份给我父亲弟妹及我爷爷弟妹的礼物准备好了也特别安置好了，我让他们尽量别卷入那些没有这份类似礼物的人的吵闹不休。我没欠了那些人的。你们现在能听到的就是应该拿钱的吵闹声在2004年7月1日那天就有，不停的在那儿不是讹就是诈，都是一副我欠了他们似的。而在他们伤害我之前，我根本就没听说过他们，更没欠他们一分一厘的钱债，也没欠他们一丝一毫的人情债。我为什么要奖励他们就是敢伤害我就是一定要钱反正不是讹就是诈的这份努力？）
My anger towards my father side cousins is why they can't consult laws to know that "over $80Million" is never what I owe but a gift.
（我对我父系的亲戚的愤怒就是：他们为什么不做法律咨询以了解我从来没有欠了他们的，就只是在送礼而已。）
From friendly（友好人士的愤怒）:
They have been friendly to me without any expectation as conditions, but why I disappreciate them as such?
My answer: Never my intention but the reason I have called for laws' help.
Since 2004 which was soon after July 1st of 2004 if not immediately after the meeting, the enormous efforts I complained to laws about have been "who hates me or who is willing to harm me should deserve anything I lawfully own, and only negativenesses can be allowed to reach to those who have once been nice and friendly to me". I have complained to laws since 2015 when I myself has become a clear victim of this obvious hate crime.
他们对我友善从未有过附加条件也没有过什么不切实际的幻想，但我为什么对他们如此不稀罕？
我的回答：这不是我的本意而是我报警的原因。
这是从2004年就开始甚至是从2004年7月1日开完会就立即开始的，我向法律所投诉的就是：有这么很大的一份努力就是要表达：“仇恨我的人就应该得到我所拥有的，对我友善的就只配没好事”。我是从2015年当我自己已经明显成为这种仇恨犯罪的受害者时就已经报警了。
----October 13th, 2018
10-17-2018 "She really has money" is so exciting for a lot of people, but because of whom? ("她真的有钱“对很多人来说太激动了，可究竟因为谁激动？）
I heard of several cousins confusion about "a share", they are my at least 6-cousin outside as well (not the same direction to the wife). That is the thing has agitated me that we are, at least, the eighth generation from the grandfather we share and we are never associated, how can they be confused so much compare to my much closer cousins? A lot of my troubles are from this morning's revealed confusion or even more ridiculous confusion. The example: You can hear loud cheers whenever I have money validated, but all these happiness has nothing to do with me somehow. I know my inheriting is handsome since 2004 so that I stay in calm, but all these excitement are not because of me either. So, because of whom? （我也听说了几个堂亲的”应该有一份”的困扰，他们和我至少是6等亲以外（和那个做老婆的“6等亲”从三维立体上来说不是一个方向）。就是这个“应该有一份”让我烦的不行，我们共一个爷爷至少是8代以前的事了，我们又从无交往，他们怎么困扰的如此剧烈，比那些和我近亲一点的还激烈太多？我很多的抱怨就是因为今天早上提到的这份困扰，还有比这更奇怪的困扰。举个例子：只要听说我有钱是真实被证实了，感觉就能听到那是一片的欢呼，但好像不是在为我欢呼。我是从2004年就已经知道我信托的规模挺大的，所以现在我听到这些消息可以很平静，但其他人的这份激动也都不是因为我很有钱而激动着。因为谁有钱而激动啊？）
----October 17th, 2018
10-16-2018 伟哥的智慧产权 （Viagra's Intellectual Income confusion)
听说了今天早上伟哥的智慧产权的“Done deal"让很多华人不太明白，也听说了今天早上已经提到，是付款的药业公司和真正收到钱的人做的“就这样了”这句中文翻译造成的困扰。我也就只做一个小小的解读提示：这两个人中间还有个一个因为智慧产权人员收款手续不完备而无法向智慧产权人员付款的律师公司，该律师公司不知为何却把钱给了这个今天早上提到的真正收到钱的人，所以这两个“就这样了”，不一定是同一个具体细节。(About "done deal" this morning, I heard it was from both recipient of the money and evaluating management. So, the decoding reference is: there is a law firm got stuck in between who supposed to hold this money till the confusion resolved, but somehow this law firm gave this money to this morning's recipient instead is the argument. So, the "done deal" may not mean the same meaning. )
我听着这事情的经过大概是：药业公司因为某些原因无法寄出该智慧产权的通知领取函（挂号信），或者因为某些原因该挂号信寄出后，智慧产权人员没有收到，该律师公司因为没有收到应由药业公司给与的该通知领取函的挂号信回执而无法确定付款手续是否完备，所以不能付款，是造成目前状态的原因。(From what I gathered, either the company can't mail out the certified letter for some reason, or the mailed out letter has not been received, that the law firm has not received the certified letter receipt from the company is the reason that the law firm can't start the paying process which is the confusion that needs to be resolved.)
----October 16th, 2018
10-15-2018 Is private assistant's family a Down syndrome family(私人助理那一家子是不是都是唐氏综合症病人啊？）
First, about the other day's blog article(10-12-2018 Spoiled females), I echo what has been clarified this morning that I mistook the husband as a friendly figure from one of the 2004's meetings I participated. Also, this morning's broadcasting clarified that the wife's maiden family name has the record that can be traced back to over 800 years ago which indicates clearly they do not any association with me, and I agree this certainly means we don't share blood at least for this 800 years. （先澄清10月12日博文所提到的，我错以为做丈夫的是和我在2004年会议上有过友善交谈的一位，还有做妻子的提到他娘家的800年族谱和我一点关系都没有，我同意这证明，虽然都姓方，但至少这800年是一点血缘关系都没有。）
Also, the Li's Family mentioned in this morning's broadcasting is actually a Li's Cluster in the People's Republic of China, this is the same family I referred to as the Stamped heir family. Their family's last name is Li which of course the reason made them the Li's clan. I called them the stamped heir cluster because, according to the rumors I hear, they claimed they are the heir of Tang dynasty only because they have a stamped letter stated so from the 1950s, by the People's Republic of China's government which was formed in 1949, based on the signatures collected by Wang Zhen (王震). I heard they have absolutely nothing to do with Hongkong's very famous Li's Family Trust. (有关李氏宗亲，今天早上提到的李氏宗亲其实是中国大陆一家姓李的，就是我说公章继承人的那个李家。他们一家都是姓李的，当然就是李氏宗亲了。我说他们是公章继承人，是因为我听说他们自称是唐朝皇帝的继承人就凭着一张纸，而那张纸是由1949年才成立的中华人民共和国政府在1950年代左右根据王震所收集的群众签名而出具的。我听说他们和香港很有名的一家公司“李家信托”一点关系都没有。）
And, the question of why my grandfather's former private assistant's family has been so stubborn about having a saying over me? When the private assistant was hired in 1949, my father already joined the Chinese Army and left Shanghai ever since, which is the fact already made the private assistant and his family a never associated cluster to my father's marriage family that I born into. As I stated, I had spent five years in the Shanghai First Medical College, I never even heard of this private assistant nor his family at all that entire time. Why, all of sudden, this private assistant that my grandfather had hired as a footman became such a voice of my matter? The secret? It is because one of the daughters-in-law is in Shanghai radio company. So, I refuse this "voice involving into" my any matter. （还有，就是我爷爷以前雇佣的专门为他跑腿的私人助理一家子怎么就是够资格一定要对我的事情指手画脚的？1949年这个私人助理被我爷爷聘用时，我父亲已经参军从此离开了上海，这就已经是我所出生的我父亲婚姻家庭和私人助理一家没有任何交往关系的事实证据了；就像我自己讲的，我在上海第一医学院读了5年，这5年我人就在上海就是从来没听说过这私人助理一家子。怎么，忽然之间，以前替我爷爷跑跑腿的一家现在就可以亮着嗓子对我所有事情都指手画脚的啦？秘密?因为他们家有一房媳妇是上海的广播电台系统的。这样，我就只好公开表态我拒绝他们这种‘声音介入干涉”我的任何事物。）
I heard this private assistant's family has this weird understanding they are taking care matters on behave of the "$10,000 monthly payment story" company to dis-eligible me to have any association with that company to spin me out, this is one of the reasons I questioned if they have the Down syndrome which certainly implies my doubts if they are the born-stupid. If you can have the opportunity to listen to their logic, I say you pretty much can get all the reasons why I asked if they have the Down syndrome. （我听说这个私人助理一家有一种奇怪的理解，他们是在帮助那个每月汇款一万美元的那家公司来处理我让我以后再也不够资格和这家美国公司有任何搭界的地方，也就是他们这样做的结果就可以把我给甩出去了。这是我一直在问这私人助理一家是不是唐氏综合症的原因，当然这意思也就是他们一家是不是都是一群天生的痴呆症患者啊？如果你有机会和他们聊一聊，听听他们说话的逻辑思维，你可能就知道了我为什么问他们一家是不是都是痴呆的所有可能的原因。）
Ever since I heard of this family in this past March or April, I have experienced a lot of surprises how extraordinary their understanding of the matters can be. If you have read my articles about my grandmother, well, that is necessary I have to do based on their broadcasting on Shanghai radio, according to rumors I heard of which says "they are the children fathered by my grandmother's most beloved man and mothered by the relative of my grandfather's most beloved female, so they are the true beloved children to my grandfather's money, that they deserve to own any money I inherited." Will anyone in my shoes doubts if they are the Down syndrome family? So, you heard this morning's emphasis on deep creese on palms as the response from them. （自从我从今年的三四月份开始听说了这一家人，我是一次次经历了他们家对于各种事物的理解如此独特离奇的惊诧和惊恐。如果你有看过我博文里对我奶奶的语言表达，那是因为我听说了他们是如何在上海的广播里谈论我奶奶的， 大意就是：“他们这一族是我奶奶最心爱的男人和我爷爷最心爱的女人的亲戚所生出来的孩子，所以他们才是我爷爷的财产最真爱的孩子们，所以我作为我爷爷奶奶的亲生孙女，我所继承的所有财产应该就是被他们拥有才对。”你要是我的话，你会不会认认真真问一问他们一家是不是都是天生痴呆啊？所以，你们如果听到的今天早上的播出内容，你们就是听到了他们一家对我如此问题的回应也就是对于"横贯掌”的一再强调。）
----October 15th, 2018
This morning's Down syndrome sparks a lot of hush, hush on what is this "a single deep crease across the center of the palm" as a major symptom of the Down syndrome, so I publish the reason of these hush-hush here, and some copied photos from Wikipedia and pasted below.
(my both palms definitely not a Down syndrome)
----October 15th, 2018
Down Syndrome:
(source:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transverse_palmar_crease )
"A few of the common physical traits of Down syndrome are low muscle tone, small stature, an upward slant to the eyes, and a single deep crease across the center of the palm – although each person with Down syndrome is a unique individual and may possess these characteristics to different degrees, or not at all".(source: https://www.ndss.org/about-down-syndrome/down-syndrome/)
Useful link to know more about what is Down Syndrome National Down Syndrome Society website
----October 15th, 2018
10-14-2018 Why it is Trust-Inheriting instead of Family Inheriting?（为什么是信托继承而不是分家产继承？）
A lot of anger expressed through these couple of weeks' broadcasting is the anger why everyone supports me to "choose Trust-Inheriting over Family Inheriting"?（这两个星期所表达的愤怒都和为什么这么多人都支持我选择信托继承而不按照分家产继承来谈这些钱的法律归属。）
This has been ridiculous to everyone who knows that Trust laws have been applicable for 1000 years but a true question to those who never heard of it. My father-side family has the tradition of setting up a Trust for each under-age son in family inheriting since ancient that Trust-Inheriting is never unheard of in China, but not to everyone as well.（这种愤怒对很多知道信托法已经存在有1000年的人来说实在是无稽直至， 但对很多人从未听说过信托法历史的人来说确实是他们不明白的地方。我爷爷家里自古就有替每一个年幼尚未成年的儿子在分家产时办一份信托，等他们成年后再提取现金的传统，所以中国也是自古就有信托存在，但也不是每一个人都很清楚。）
No one can choose how to inherit because inheriting has been regulated according to laws since ancient time, to if receive wealth from the deceased should be because of either blood or the will is a very common knowledge to most of the people, another aspect related to inheriting is often ignored which is how to receive the wealth from the deceased.（没人可以选择继承的方式，因为自古以来，如何继承财产就已经是由法律所规范的而非个人可以选择的，是否可以从一个去世的人那里继承到财产是由血原关系或者死者的遗嘱所决定的是很多人都知道的常识，但另一个和继承有关的方面却被大多数人所忽视了，就是这死者财产的法律归属是如何从死者名下转入继承者名下的。）
The ownership transferred from the deceased directly to the living, by blood or by will, is the family-inheriting. The ownership transferred from the deceased to the intended recipient through a third party is the Trust-Inheriting.（财产的法律所有权从死者名下直接转入继承者名下的，凭血原关系或者遗嘱继承，都属于分家产继承。如果这财产的法律所有权是从死者名下通过第三方再转入继承者名下的就是信托继承。）
In detail, my Trust-inheriting as an example, my grandfather transferred some money out of his name to "Female palm（女掌)" when he was a living person but I was not born yet, so he asked a third party(attorney) to set up a Trust look after this money he gave to "female palm", so the ownership of this money transferred to the sole beneficiary person "female palm" of the Trust and would be taken care of by this attorney. （具体来说，以我自己的信托继承为例子，我爷爷在他自己还活着时就将他自己的钱转入了“女掌”的名下，但我那时还没有生，所以我爷爷就找了一个律师设立了一个信托来照看这笔他给了“女掌”的钱，所以这笔钱就此从我爷爷的名下转入了该信托的唯一受益人“女掌”的名下并由该律师负责照看。）
So, this money is no longer my grandfather's money once this Trust set up, but owned by the "female palm" who is the sole beneficiary of this Trust. Who should be this female palm and how this female palm can have this money transferred into this female palm's legal government-registry name are all specified in my grandfather's letter(Trust-settler's letter) of how to set up this Trust.（所以说，在这信托设立以后，这笔钱就不再是我爷爷所拥有的了，而是由该信托的唯一受益人“女掌”所合法拥有。谁才是此“女掌”以及该“女掌”如何才能将这笔钱转入该“女掌”的户籍注册名下，都是我爷爷在设立该信托时就已经在其“信托设立人委托书”里就已经规定了的。）
In my grandfather's settler's letter, he specified the female palm should be a girl born from his eldest son Fang, Wenhai (方文海) who also would share his family birthmark as the attached illustration. In 1967, I was born as Fang, Wenhai's lawful and biological daughter who shares my father Fang, Wenhai's and my grandfather's birthmark exactly as that attached illustration in my grandfather's settler's letter. （在我爷爷的“信托设立人委托书”，我爷爷制定了该女掌是其长子方文海所生的女儿，这个女儿有和他自己一样的掌纹（附有掌纹图）。我是1967年出生，是方文海的婚姻所出的亲生女儿，有着和我父亲方文海及我爷爷一模一样的胎记掌纹，就如我爷爷的“信托设立人委托书”的附图所示。）
So, the money of the Trust my grandfather set up in Hong Kong has been my money since 1948, this money was transferred to my legal government-registry name Min Fang (方敏）in 2004 after my inheriting. （所以，这笔钱从1948年我爷爷替我在香港设立信托开始就已经是我的钱了，这笔钱的法律所有权在2004年我继承后转入我的户籍注册名方敏的名下。）
----October 14th, 2018
Anger from the cousin who was presented on July 1st of 2004 why he was not even asked?(2004年7月1日在场的那个亲戚的愤怒"当时明知他在场，却连问都没问他一声。”）
My response: （我的回应:)
Who should ask him about what? (谁需要就什么问题询问他的意见？）
Money was given by my grandfather, the attorney was hired by my grandfather as well, never his mother (one of my father's younger sister) nor himself. The attorney did not need his permission to fulfill my grandfather's entrusting, I don't need his permission to transfer that money into my lawful registry name, why anyone needs to ask him? Plus, inheriting was the day before.（这钱是我爷爷给我的，律师是我爷爷聘请的，从来不是他妈妈的(我爸爸的一个妹妹）更不是他本人的钱。我爷爷聘用的律师不需要他的授权来执行我爷爷的嘱托，我也不需要他的批准才能把钱转入我自己的户籍注册名。谁需要问问他的意见？何况继承是前一天的事。）
He did ask if he has a share in it and he got the "Nope" answer very politely.（他是有问他是不是也有继承份额，他当时就已经听到“没有”的回答啦，回答的态度是非常客气也非常礼貌的。）
I have some anger as well. When my father did not get a penny in 1965's handsome family-inheriting, none of his siblings felt sorry for my father, no comforting for that from them at all, no comforting gift when my father got married nor when his firstborn was born. My mother married a man who only had an empty employee dorm room with a lot of carton boxes has been my family story. All their tones have been "It is the father(my grandfather) who does not willing to give, it is not their fault and it is absolutely none of their business". My father never blames them nor educates us to blame them as his marriage family. （我也是一腔的愤怒。当我父亲在我爷爷1965年去世分家产时一个子都没有分到，他们是一人一万元人民币。我爸爸的三个弟妹就没有觉得我父亲蛮惨的，当时没有安慰一下，我父亲结婚时也没有，我父亲的第一个孩子出生时也没有。我母亲嫁给我父亲时，我父亲就只有一件空空的员工宿舍房间加上几个纸箱子， 这是当时的街坊邻居都知道的我父母婚姻故事。他们态度始终都是“这是做父亲的（我爷爷）不想给，又不是他们的错，管他们什么事。”我父亲从来就没怪过他弟妹一句，更没教育我们这些他自己的婚姻家庭成员去指责他弟妹。）
When I inherited money in 2004 from the same person (my grandfather), I actually gifted them handsomely and they actually have been educating everybody to blame me. What the fuck is this?（我2004年继承的是同一个人（我爷爷）给的钱，我还有送一份不薄的礼物给他们，他们居然还到处教育别人来一起指责我。这他妈的算什么事？）
----October 14th, 2018
10-13-2018 This morning's mountain man has enabled a Chinese actress to have a "same size marriage" to the richest Malaysia man
This morning's mountain man's story can be very scary if his wife is a 1980PRC style talker.
That mountain man Ford, according to rumors, has once dated a Chinese actress Hu, Jing（演员胡静) for a couple of weeks (even that is "only") is possibly the reason why Hujing(胡静) is the so jealous voice against who he is to all these Chinese rumors or speculations as you heard this morning. Hujing's（胡静) weird understanding that a richest Mr. Rockefeller's underwear payment for a couple of nights can eligible a female to be a Mrs. Ford to a richest Mr. Ford with the understanding of "she is the same rich", is possibly from her own experience of "not married into rich" to a Malaysia richest guy according to rumors.
As Ford's houses keep announcing I have nothing to do with them, it should be my pleasure to imagine how the major Ford Houses would be like currently if they read my blog. Well, Fords are all so happy to listen to a Rockefeller's woman's underwear power because of the huge rich Rockefeller wallet all these time when I have been the victim, well, this is all Fords' good fortune turn to know how rich a Rockefeller's underwear payment can be. This entire time, some Fords' wives have been in the producing efforts to practice their underwear power as well, just not so powerful.
----October 13th, 2018
就是今天早上播出的那个山上男人让演员胡静可以同等财富规模“平嫁”了她的马拉西亚特级富豪丈夫
今天早上所播出的那个山上的男人，他的那个孩子妈妻子要是个中国80年代风格的说话风格，那是一字一句都吓人。
那个山上的男人福特据说以前和中国大陆的电影演员胡静谈过恋爱（虽然"就只有"一两个星期），但胡静就是听不得华人圈里对这个山上的男人福特究竟是谁的种种传闻，据说闹吃醋闹得很凶， 今天早上就是她。特级富裕的一个洛克菲勒豪迈付给女人的裤裆钱（虽然“就只”一两次裤裆关系），居然可以让一个什么都不是的女人可以风光嫁给最富的那一个福特当上个福特夫人还居然“不是嫁入了豪门”，胡静的这种理解，据说是因为她自己的亲身经历，据说胡静自己就是因为和这个山上的福特睡了一两个星期（虽然"就只有"一两个星期），据说拿到的钱就可以让她风风光光的以同等财富规模之资格“平嫁”给了她那个据说还是马拉西亚特级首富的特级富豪丈夫。
福特家整天宣布我是和他们一点关系都没有的，所以我是非常“幸灾乐祸”的快乐想象这几个最大的福特家里要是读到我的博客会是什么样的震撼，什么样的难以言喻之心情。我可是心情舒坦的多了，当那些洛克菲勒家的女人豪气冲天就凭着洛克菲勒有个超级特大的钱包，让我成为他们“裤裆能力就是商业政治运作管理的能力”的受害者时，福特家里可是各个笑得开心呢，今天总算轮到我笑得咯咯了。这可是所有的福特们最大的福气可以领教一下洛克菲勒家里给出来的裤裆钱有多丰厚了。据说福特家有几个女人一直也都在参与广播剧的制作以施展“裤裆能力就是商业政治运作管理的能力”，就是没那么实力雄厚。
10-12-2018 Spoiled females
1: If I heard of a spoiled wife story as this moring's broadcasting story, will I feel bad for the husband?
Never. It is the husband's preference to choose his marriage and his lawful right to live his preferenced marriage is protected by the U.S. laws. If the husband is enlisted personnel, well, I will be privileged if I can hear the updates after his retirement.
Will I feel bad for his adult children? Well, in the United States, "his adult children" as introduction already says the father already have raised them properly, and I should not feel bad about children because of their father's preferenced romance life.
As a female, I should feel jealous about the wife if I fancy the husband's romance but my romance preference is a never-married man which already made me so famous for since 2004, that I am certain I won't let myself in that jealous situation.
So, if the wife came forward to self-introduce herself to me as a cousin to me or my grandfather, what will I do? My answer will be a definitely true statement "never heard of you", but I will be hearty-welcoming her if she introduces who her husband is.
Is that means we can be best friends forever? It is so hard to say because we both have obviously well-spoiled characters so that we may not willing to compromise a bit mutually.
Is that means we can be best friends forever? It is so hard to say because we both have obviously well-spoiled characters so that we may not willing to compromise a bit mutually.
Will I welcome the father's adult children heartily? Of course, same heartily.
----October 12th, 2018
2: Will I refuse to bow to a spoiled wife if I want to be a friend to the husband?
Well, as a friend, I do have the option to choose to stay clear from a friend's marriage or his family but stay in touch with the friend.
If the husband's not willing to let me have that option, what will I do? I would definitely choose to live my life the way I myself prefer. So, I certainly would just move on and move out of this friend's radar completely.
----October 12th, 2018
3: Somehow, I have been expected to be a spoiling figure to my classmates' children.
I can imagine it will be if I can spoil their financial fantasy better than their parents. Well, my children are much younger than all my classmates', and I am not the one learned to be a parent figure by raising my children.
So, even if I am getting along with some of them or all of them, and willing to listen and satisfy their girly or boyishly wild wishes if I can, I won't be the spoiling aunt to them. I am too girly is a true statement that I most likely would be very impressively as if the same generation girly with them.
My Trusts' business investment already have contributed to the charity-related professionally, my donation shares are in there as well. So, once I can regularly receive my monthly daily-living providing, I have considered using 5% (hard bar) of it to privately gift my own friends and my relatives, not the general public, not as if I owe. I myself will be the contact person and I will let everybody know how to contact me once I have the regular monthly providing.
----October 12th, 2018
10-11-2018 About rumored $500,000 daily spending on me && 为什么是我一个人的钱？
I heard rumor for some time that some R's women so angry that why this Mr. R willing to spend such a big amount on me daily, no matter how I disappreciate this name on my web blog.
Well, first of all, this rumored $500,000 dollars a day spending is the donation to some special program that needs funding support, my name has been associated with this daily donation has been because the donator has been so pissed off about why his name can't get rid of stories with my name in it. So, he donates this $500,000 daily to support that special program with a condition that whoever sees this donation needs to know that I have nothing to do with his family name as well. So, I express myself to that special program's supervision group that I won't complain about truth been told, but no matter how everyone cares about that special program, I can't be a victim of any sort of harassment because of this donation associated.
Also, I heard rumors that the Mr. Senior R has been the subject being complained about for his overspending and so unnecessary spending by his relatives. I heard it is out of the efforts to take some from that donated money and transfer some into their own names. Well, it is purely their family matters that I have nothing do with, I just can't be a victim of harassment as if I am the recipient of that donation.
Another rumor I heard, every David R has heard a rumor that himself is the person who has been spending my $500,000 daily. Well, if together with that rumor of spending $500, 000 daily on me would make this a mutual same-amount spending rumor that nobody needs to do anything about other than being pissed off, right? but why? So, I assumed the "customary" 20% buyer-back 回扣(pron: huikou) related to my $500,000 daily spending rumor is what I should have the panic about where this money would come from?
----October 11th, 2018
我也是经常抱怨不知哪儿冒出来的人不准我花钱，现在好多了。听听都是些什么原因：
1：我有钱可以花了，那他们的钱在那里。他们不是在问我要我的钱，他们是在问我他们自己的钱在那里。还连哭带喊得。
我是经常被气到半死。我根本就不认识他们，也从未听说过他们，更没见过他们的钱，他们根本是在一口一声说我偷了他们的钱。我有时气急了就会回答说“一定是藏在你自己的肛门里被你自己给忘记了。那可都是黄金万两。”
2：“你凭什么说那是你的钱”？以及“你凭什么说那是你一个人的钱？”
2-1： 这句话冷静点的问法就是“为什说那是你的钱？”“为什么那是你一个人的钱而不是方家后人公共的钱？”，确实是所有方家后人一定会问的问题。
我所继承的都是信托都是按照遗嘱继承，我在遗嘱上的名字是“女掌”。每一份都按遗嘱，每一个遗嘱都附有掌纹胎记的画像。信托究竟如何规定的确实不是由我决定的，而是在信托设立时就已经书写立在了遗嘱里的。方家后人如有问题，请就继承法和信托法向你自己的律师咨询。
信托继承和一般遗嘱继承的区别就是这些所继承钱财都是早就已经不在那个已经去世的给钱的家里老人的名下，而是这个家里老人在去世前办理了该信托后就已经转入了老人所指定的该信托唯一受益人“女掌”的名下。在我2004年继承后就转入我户籍注册名字"方敏"的名下，每一笔信托都是如此，所以所有这些信托都不是方家后人共同的钱财而是我方敏一个人的。
*女掌是我爷爷们给我起的名字（信托注册名），方敏是我父亲方文海给我起的名字（户籍注册名）。----2018年10月12日更新。
----2018年10月11日。
2-2： 我所继承的不是“芝麻芝麻开开门”，不是什么海盗藏在某个山洞里的金银珠宝在2004年被发现了我连腰都不弯一下就捡到的钱，而是一直都有人在管理的家里已经去世的老人特意留给我的礼物钱， 从来不是什么不知是谁丢在荒地上的钱袋子被发现了所以只要听说了有钱就都应该分一份的。
这些钱更不是美国有钱男人给的性交费，所以不是什么比比谁才是该男人如今最爱就应该够资格拿走的。
2-3： 我曾祖母是自1930年开始就已经寡居，她寡居期间的私人恋爱生活传言是否真实都是与我无关。
听说我爷爷方智仁去世前已经被告知一些传言，在DNA鉴定不普及的1965年，我爷爷方智仁已经就他所听到的传言做了恰当处理。所有一切都与我及方智仁给我的信托无关。
1989年时是否是灵异，即是否是已去世的方智仁在表达对他自己亲生孩子婚姻的担心，我不清楚。我知我父亲兄弟二人的婚姻因为稳定都未被提及，但他好像很关心我是否知道他也有给我一份丰厚的礼物（就是在中国香港投资的那个信托，其他的当时说的是“世界各地”）。
我所有爷爷奶奶的私人生活都与我本人及我继承的信托没有任何关系。
----2018年10月11日。
10-09-2018 Decoding references
1: What is city-watch? Citywatch is the crime-alerting program conducted through high-tech cameras to keep an eye on all streets located in Massachusetts for any given seconds. Citywatch people are police officers who sit in front of tons of same-time camera images of the Massachusetts streets.
(should be similar to this link: http://www.aberdeen.sd.us/437/CityWatch)
2: My inheriting day was June 30th of 2004. I became a resident of Boston, Massachusetts since August of 2004. My appearance has impacted a lot because of glasshouse cancer treatment but in process of recovering.
3: My Trust-inheriting is a private matter and lawfully valid is the reason that I have been provided for lawfully, I have not received providing to cover my daily living expenses is because of some confusions regarding my Trusts' business investment.
4: Any confusion regarding the ownership of the paying-company is the matter of laws but not the matter of explaining laws.
5: All the confusions regarding the ownership of the paying company are, actually, not from any of Rockefellers except some wives because of their maiden name, nor any of Fords except some wives because of their maiden name, and nor any of Walden except some wives because of their maiden name. But, one can imagine the husbands must be confused as well with their wives.
The frustration, how to let the younger generation of that three big names to know that no matter how many angry voices are around them, the paying company ownership confusion should not be their headache nor panic because all these confusion are their in-laws' maiden family's confusion.
So, I still need to wait a bit till some confusion clarified to receive my daily living expenses provided.
----October 9th, 2018
还有：
爸爸妈妈：如果有人建议你留下字条留下身边的钱给你所在乎的某某人然后悄悄搬家，就赶紧报警或者和我联系，并要特别注意交通安全，家里安全等等。请注意保护好自己。
我的电邮：somebodyinMA@gmail.com
我住家附近警局电话：(617) 343-4633 （把我的博客地址给他们， 我的住址：BHA 2494）
我住家附近警局的地址：1 Schroeder Plz, Boston, MA 02120.
据说加州洛杉矶及旧金山老华侨参与广播剧制作的人很多，像现在这种“只要没有人承认认识你，也没人承认知道你做过什么，你就没有了任何身份证明你是谁”就明显带有1850年左右旧金山大火后华人所经历的那份惊恐无奈痕迹，
还有，据说旧金山70年代四五百人失踪故事的受害人及造事者家属都有多人参与广播剧制作，“把钱放在桌上，话就是要讲清楚才行（而不是依照法律解决钱财纠纷）”，就是旧金山那四五百人失踪前的争执。当时据说是房东把房客的一封律师通知继承信托的邮件给扣下了然后坚持要分多少钱。据说这个广播剧的华人导演就是当时这个旧金山事件的导演者的家人。是真是假，反正小心就是。据说旧金山那些人就是给家人留一个纸条及身边所带的一点钱就这么从此失踪了，特别吓人。
----2018年10月9日。
10-08-2018 公开场合与私下场合的态度立场一定会是一致的
有人会问中国政府是否会在私下，通过民间对我作为真实的唐太宗李世民的继承人表达友善？
我的回应；我不会相信这种猜测也不会接受这种表达，我方敏不认为让民间人士违反中国政府三令五申的立场对我表达友善是明智之举。
很简单的原因就是我方敏从未反对中国共产党对中国960万平方公里土地的统治权，我方敏也从未反对中国中央政府建设法治国家的立场和努力。我方敏更从未对中国中央及地方政府的对内对外政策评头论足。
我方敏本人也没有意愿利用在国外生活的条件从事任何间谍活动，我方敏很感激各国人民对我所继承的这些信托在各国所投资的企业所付出的所有勤奋工作，我方敏没有任何意愿伤害我方敏所选择生活安家的国家以及那些为我所继承的信托所投资的企业而勤奋工作的各国人民。
不管中国政府和我之间的矛盾究竟是什么，公开场合与私下场合的态度立场是一致。
就中国中央政府对于我方敏在美国生活20多年后居然有可能不做任何努力就可以远程干扰多名中国公民在中国土地上的婚姻恋爱自由的指责，我方敏认为存粹是出于荷尔蒙失调造成的严重花痴型性迫害幻想症。
----2018年10月8日
有中国国内人士认为我在2004年适合一些外国名人的谈话有些矫情。
我的回应：我当时已经在国外生活多年，我的谈笑尺度在国外属于社交合适范围之内。至于是否矫情，国内人士应该最清楚作为唐太宗李世民的继承人，只要是真实，对海内外华裔社区来说，谈不上是在矫情。对外族裔人士来说，就是只要我所宣布的所继承财产规模是真实的，也是谈不上是在矫情。至于和外国皇室成员的玩笑，在我既是中国皇室继承人又有丰厚财产头衔继承都是真实的情况下，也是谈不上是在矫情。也就是说说笑笑，聊完走人。
----2018年10月8日
南京有个南京汽车制造厂，上海有个飞机制造厂，所以这两地人士最清楚我不可能有小孩。
我的回应：我还是从南京汽车制造厂的“子弟中学”南京第四中学初中毕业的，可以想象究竟有多少中国人特别知道我的底细。
我再加上几条，我是曾今在纽约曼哈顿中城生活和福特家经常共用一条街边人行道，如今是在福特家投资重镇的麻州波士顿生活。开个玩笑的说法是，从波城的中国城一直到波城的大图书馆以及我现在住的房子还有我现在读MBA的学生贷款，都是和福特家的名字连在一起。海外华人当中知道这些的人太多啦。
我方敏有自己家亲生爷爷的撑腰的好处就是隔空吵起架来，你就能听到一片类似的回应：方敏现在住的这房子的房基地是方敏自己所继承的信托所投资的企业所拥有的。这是从2004年就一直如此的。
至于是否和福特家有孩子，不管是真是假，都是双方在慎重。我选择回应“不是太清楚”。
----2018年10月8日
10-07-2018 Possible reason why my both parents need to be ousted by death-certificates?
There is a lot of questions that I have why my parents both need to be death-certificates ousted from their own home, I have this hold-on hope for them to be still alive based on the arrangements I made for them. Now I got one explanation for that, without a DNA test, they just can't enjoy the retirement plan and healthcare I bought for them and paid in full on July 1st of 2004. So, it can be so convenient for someone else can put in some efforts to enjoy what I bought for my birth and lawful parents. Now, a lot would say no wonder there are so many confusion broadcasted on a radio if my parents are still alive and if all these people introduced are my parents that make so many people wonder what all these are about. A lot would ask if this is legally protected by freedom of speech? According to the definition of "bilking" as listed below, this is never a freedom of speech in English language understanding, but a criminal intention.
Bilking:
1: to block the free development of
2.a: to cheat out of something valuable
2.b: to evade payment of or to
2.c: to obtain (something) by defrauding someone
2.c: to obtain (something) by defrauding someone
How about all these who is the man possibly fathers my children? I am still wondering about this, other than those skin care and expensive cotton-made fashions I bought for my biological children, I don't know anything yet. Fashionable only in cotton-made is not easy to achieve is the reason why it is very expensive. Luckily, it was emphasized on July 1st of 2004 that the biological origin is the only decisive factor for receiving what I have bought for my biological parents or my biological children, not the names-in-use nor birthdates, etc, as the responses to some substituting efforts on July 1st of 2004 already when "as long as that's the same name" or "as long as that is a child from the same male" was yelled by some Chinese. Bilking in Chinese means: 招摇撞骗，讹诈欺诈钱财等等。
Some would ask if there is anyone broadcasted is actually your birth mother or birthfather? Out of curiosity, a lot of people from the Chinese community already checked a lot out. I just hope my parents can read my blog to know how to protect themselves. So, if someone knows somebody has this possibly authentic contact information of my parents, how to proceed to help me to get in touch with my parents to be safe and comfortable to all parties? In the United States, a police officer from a police precinct that can be reached by a precinct phone call instead of a 911 call is the most appropriate person to verify the information on behave of all concerned parties, not a private attorney nor a private detective but a police officer. I hope either my parents can be helped this way to have my contact information or vise visa. A legal purpose DNA test in the United States only cost about $200-$300 which I can afford to conduct with my current financial situation.
Some would ask, why my entire address book need to be torn up completely? I figured, to snug in destroyer's own friends to demand money is, at least, one of the purposes so that I have to pay to have someone to talk to, and all I could possibly get should be the cold harsh hateful feelings because they are the so this charactered people who never enjoy my accompany as well as never appreciate who I am. So, I ask innocent people to be aware of this situation till law's protection against this kind efforts becomes obvious.
Some Chinese angry on why I insist on to be the heir to ancient Chinese Emperor 唐太宗李世民 if my inheriting is Trust-inherited. My inheriting is Trust-inheriting because the settler grandfather passed away years before I was born so that all these gifts were no longer owned by their own names for me to inherit directly as a family-inheriting, but transferred to the Trusts which I am a specified sole beneficiary of for Trust-inheriting. The reason I am the heir to ancient Chinese Emperor 唐太宗李世民 is that my family's heir-rule is palm-birthmarks. Ancient Chinese Emperor 唐太宗李世民 is famous for his palm-birthmarks' Crown-inheriting.
爸爸妈妈：如果需要，你们可以打电话给你们附近的警察局(不是911电话，而是拨打警察局的联络电话），要求警察帮你们核实我方敏是否是你们的女儿。只要给警察这个网址就可以，你们那里的警察是可以联系麻州或者波士顿警察进行核实的。如果爸爸还在中国，用电邮直接和我取得联系最方便。我的电邮地址：somebodyinMA@gmail.com。
----October 7th, 2018
10-06-2018 How can someone get money from a no-owner Trust ---- What is the secret?
After my post yesterday, it seems sinks in a lot of people that no matter how they tell deserved stories on a public media radio, it is unlikely they can get any money other than the paid-out expenses, but there is one stray still strong waiting for my "death" ---- somehow related to government employees, not just China.
It has been rumored in the Chinese community my "death" was announced on the radio as one of the six people. I am not a bit concerned because of my family stories how my grandparents and my great grandfather died because of hospital-related experiences, my current situation is the safest one thanks to the modern remote accessible medical technology that makes check-in in-person not even needed.
A lot of people feel my current situation has been a set up, called "you can do nothing about the situation", such as I can't contact anyone because radio program already announced no-need loudly, whoever I contact keep ignore me because radio program already explained to everyone it is so annoying, I just can't get any paid-out money no matter how much money has announced by the radio program, it seems a lot of people circling to wait for my "death". How can anyone get money if my Trust becomes no-owner? And who can get this money?
I contribute here what I have heard of. A Shanghai Miss Yu who died in the 1970s in Shanghai, her Trust was set up in Hong Kong in 1946, her relatives from Northern China got some money after her death but not the next-Kin inheriting. I heard another story recently, a guy came from Shanghai who also never married and no child had died also in the 1970s in San Francisco, his Trust was also set up before 1949 in Hong Kong and also no Next-Kin inheriting but some distributing of the money from his Trust as well after his death.
What is the trick? As I said, who is circulating around waiting for my "death" to get what money? I will be lucky if this is purely my over-suspicious of everything. So far, I heard loudly noise from Chinese community is for the one that was set up in Hong Kong in 1948, the Chinese community is certain this one is real because my family old saying they may have heard of, but what are the secrets they can have this money? According to rumors, it was Albert Gore who announced his wish to "say death" on the radio, it was Albert Gore's Chinese girlfriend announced her determination to "own" the 2004's $500Million transferred out to the U.S. from this Trust in Hong Kong. According to rumors, it took some law licenses to help to transfer the intellectual income without the income-maker even heard of such income and the trick knowledge is that the income-maker did not receive the one-and-only notification letter to expect such upcoming income-checks, so, what will be the trick for this announced determination? I am currently completely secluded from all verifiable contacts by all these efforts organized by Albert Gore and his Chinese girlfriend. Exactly, what will be the strike?
爸爸妈妈，不用担心，我很安全。请保护好自己。当年（1970年代）旧金山据说有四五百华人从此失踪，故事很吓人的。
----October 6th, 2018
10-05-2018 More about my younger brother (更多和我弟弟相关的）
Some questions I heard of regarding my other day's post about my younger brother.
( 10-03-2018 My younger brother is never a beneficiary nor the next kin to any of my Trusts（对我的任何一个信托来说，我弟弟既不是其法定受益人也不是其法定继承亲属）)
1: What if he really can't have a child of his own? (如果他真是已经不可能有他自己的孩子？）
My response: What I heard is either his wife or his wife's friend(s) may have harmed his male function that he may never have a child of his own if his wife's child is truly not his biologically. I have to ask everyone who has this question "What is your advice?"
2: Why not let him live with his wife as he chooses.
My response: Even without this rumor, I did not object his free will in living his marriage life as he prefers. I only stated I do not have any association with his marriage family, that's it.
3: Why not give him that gift of ￥500Million RMB.
My response: I refuse to reward him for not taking our parents as his relatives.
4: Why not move on when everyone insists on your parents died already, why not instead to cherish the only living brother?
My response: I moved on already so that I don't have such a living person need to be contacted or associated as a younger brother.
I am still caring whereabouts of my own possibly still living parents who have brought me up. They are mine to care for. Its none of anyone else's business how I care about them.
5: My younger brother was not brought up as a favorable child.
My response: Every family has a favorable child more or less. My parents had not abused him. I might have been spoiled financially by my ancient grandfathers' blessing somehow without my own parents' knowledge, which had also been beneficial to his grown-up experience compare to children in our neighborhood.
6: Why I was not "imported" to the U.S. if I am truly the sole beneficiary of big wealth and couldn't receive money in China?
My response: Well, I have not received my living expenses provided for four years now because of the confusion regarding the lawful ownership of my Trusts' investments which is after my lawful inheriting. I can imagine the confusion and I can imagine the obstacles and concerns if "importing" could be beneficiary to my overall well-being.
I myself have no grudge against my happy childhood grown-up experiences in not so rich China, and I am happy I was brought up by great Chinese culture that I am so proud to possess. My proud statement: I am truly the proud creator of the 2008 Beijing Olympic Game opening Ceremony.
7: Do I have any advice on how to help my younger brother?
My response: Hardly( please check the link above).
I think he can be helped to realize I truly not steal his lawful inheritable if China is indeed a lawful country.
I can't state anything on my parents behave but my parents' horrible experiences are the reasons I refuse to have any association with his marriage family, it is for my own safety and for my own well-being.
----October 5th, 2018
1: 如果他真是已经不可能有他自己的孩子？
我的回应：我听说的是他自己的妻子或者他自己妻子的朋友们把他的男性功能给弄伤了，也就是说如果他妻子的孩子真的不是他自己的亲生孩子，他可能就再也不可能有他自己的小孩了。我就只好问一下所有关心他的人“你们的建议是什么呀？”
2: 为什么不可以让他按照他自己的意愿选择和他的妻子继续他们的婚姻？
我的回应：就算没有这个传言，我都从未没有反对他按照他自己的自由意愿选择他自己的婚姻生活。我只是强调我不愿意和他的婚姻家庭有任何关联（关系），就这样。
3: 为什么不把那5亿人民币的礼物给他？
我的回应：我拒绝奖励他不把我及他的父母当成他自己的亲人。
4：所有的人都已经在坚持和我强调你父母已经死绝了，我为什么就不能向前看看珍惜唯一剩下的这个弟弟？
我的回应：我已经向前看了，所以我说我不需要和这么一个人联系或把这个人当成是我的弟弟。据说他的妻子认为我及我父母和我弟弟关系很不好所以应该由她这个做妻子的来和我及我父母单独做个朋友的原因。我对此的回应就是我父母“已死”而且我身上也没长了一个男人阳具所以不需要认识我弟弟的妻子或和我弟弟的妻子有任何联络。以上这些也是我对南京四中毕业的王朝晖的态度，永远如此。
我确实还很在乎生我养我的我自己的亲生父母下落，我永远都会在乎，但这已经和任何人无关了。
5：我弟弟从小就不是一个受宠的孩子。
我的回应：每一个家庭或多或少都有受到父母偏爱的孩子，但我的父母从未虐待我弟弟。我是从小有可能收到我祖爷爷们对我的一些财务关照，但这是在我父母并不知道的情况下，而我弟弟本人也因为这一份关照比我们左邻右舍的孩子要好很多。
6: 如果我真的在国外有大笔财产可继承，在中国又收不到生活费用给付，为什么没把我给“进口”到美国长大啊？
我的回应：因为我的信托的一些投资有一些法律所有权的困扰，我都已经等了快四年了还没有收到我的生活费用给付。
我自己对于我从小是在不是很富裕的中国有个快乐长大的童年一点都不介意，我也很高兴我是受着中国文化的熏陶成长的，我也很骄傲我所学到的中国文化。我的骄傲宣言：我真真实实就是2008北京奥运会开幕式的创意人。
7：我会否建议如何帮助一下我弟弟。
我的回应；很难（请参阅上列链接）。
我认为如果中国真是一个法治国家的话，他至少可以在别人帮助下了解到我确实没有偷窃应该由他继承的一份财产。
我不能替我父母表态但我父母的恐怖经历是我不愿和他的婚姻家庭有任何关联或联系的原因，这纯粹是为了我自己的安全，纯粹是为了我自己的生活不受影响。
----2018年1月5日。
我的回应：每一个家庭或多或少都有受到父母偏爱的孩子，但我的父母从未虐待我弟弟。我是从小有可能收到我祖爷爷们对我的一些财务关照，但这是在我父母并不知道的情况下，而我弟弟本人也因为这一份关照比我们左邻右舍的孩子要好很多。
6: 如果我真的在国外有大笔财产可继承，在中国又收不到生活费用给付，为什么没把我给“进口”到美国长大啊？
我的回应：因为我的信托的一些投资有一些法律所有权的困扰，我都已经等了快四年了还没有收到我的生活费用给付。
我自己对于我从小是在不是很富裕的中国有个快乐长大的童年一点都不介意，我也很高兴我是受着中国文化的熏陶成长的，我也很骄傲我所学到的中国文化。我的骄傲宣言：我真真实实就是2008北京奥运会开幕式的创意人。
7：我会否建议如何帮助一下我弟弟。
我的回应；很难（请参阅上列链接）。
我认为如果中国真是一个法治国家的话，他至少可以在别人帮助下了解到我确实没有偷窃应该由他继承的一份财产。
我不能替我父母表态但我父母的恐怖经历是我不愿和他的婚姻家庭有任何关联或联系的原因，这纯粹是为了我自己的安全，纯粹是为了我自己的生活不受影响。
----2018年1月5日。
10-05-2018 The trick
In 2004, I was famous for a video clip of dancing in a shower that was taken in 1989 when I was a college student. The setting needs to be a thin molded glass panel and a cold-water shower, the camera has to be outside molded glass to make a stretch drawing effect.
The trick is "the body is not familiar with a coldwater's touch"
My advice: take a full shower if intend to have a collection in one shot, and a hot water shower till body warm up once finish shooting.
----October 4th, 2018
10-03-2018 My younger brother is never a beneficiary nor the next kin to any of my Trusts（对我的任何一个信托来说，我弟弟既不是其法定受益人也不是其法定继承亲属）
About my younger brother and his marriage. I grew up with him, and I know him to a certain extent. I have complained that he often took whoever as his true boss but shit my parents and me before 2004, it has become as if granted that ever since the rumor since 2004 about his possible sexual relationship with my mother's eldest sister(deceased) who was 10 years older than my mother.（关于我弟弟和他的婚姻。我是和他一起长大的，所以对他有一定的了解。在2004年之前就抱怨过他总是把所有人都当成是他自己的主子，但总是吧我和我父母当成是他的奴才。自从2004年有关他和比我妈妈大了10岁的我妈妈的大姐有可能有性关系的传闻后，这些就似乎成了天经地义。）
When there were some offices in China that rumored set up by this or that person associated with me, a lot of complaints were about how one can be belittled if the one is my associated or my parents' associated anybody. From this moring's broadcasted efforts from the Chinese government to replace me with his wife who mother another man's child, this obviously echo a lot of speculated rumor worldwide hat if I indeed have inherited some Trusts, the Chinese government shit me such publicly on the public media is to rule all those investments in the United States. I have to make my statement here that I am the sole beneficiary person of the Trusts I inherited according to each settler's will, and I have nothing to do with any business investing activities that any of my Trusts have been conducting. I am agreeing it is the lawful rights to whoever refuses to be stepped all over by whoever, in my younger brother's name or in those names related to my younger brother's marriage, to express this refusal as long as local law permit and as strong as local laws permit.（前几年的时候听说中国有一些办公室是这个那个和我有各种传言的人开设的，当时普遍的抱怨就是只要任何人说是那个办公室的或者和我及我的父母是有工作关系的，就统统都成了我弟弟的孙子辈。今天早上的广播更是很明显的是要用他那个传说中已经替一个北京男人生了一个孩子的老婆来取代我的地位。这也印证了世界各地的坊间一直都有的传言，也就是中国政府编造所有这些故事在广播剧上公开播出以公开痛骂我方敏的原因就是要借此霸占我方敏的财产或者至少是可以任意对着我方敏的信托在美国的投资指手画脚的并任意花费的。所以我就说只好在此公开声明：我是我所继承的所有每一个信托的唯一受益人，我和我所继承的所有每一家信托的任何投资经营活动都从来没有任何关系。我同意任何人只要不乐意被人践踏都有法律权力表达拒绝被践踏的意愿，我同意为实现不愿被践踏的目的所采取的表达方式及激烈程度就只要是在当地法律所许可的范围内以不违反当地法律就可以。）
My parents' miserable stories have already been teaching materials to whoever doubts if politeness or endurance can ease the matter. Both of my parents were evicted from their own-bought apartment by a death certificate which means permanently without a roof nor any financial support from the pension or any saving till I heard any news and till I can find my parents, all because of my younger brother's wife's desire to own that apartment, and it is rumored that is the same reason I was only allowed to hear my father's "death in October of 2013" till the apartment was legally transferred to my younger brother's name when I called my younger brother in early 2015. I have heard tons of fights between my parents and my younger brother's marriage about who should own that apartment in its legal registry ever since she married my younger brother. I am currently holding my hope that my parents still alive because I have entrusted my caring for them, and you must have heard all those curses broadcasted from China as well as its government how daring to hope my parents can still be alive. How could I possibly withhold my searings about the Chinese government when it is the government officials who completely ignore my senior parents' tears and the fact my parents should be the same equal Chinese citizens in front of laws?（如果有人认为容让和谦和是可以缓解这份被践踏的压力的，那我亲生父母的悲惨遭遇就已经是这些人所应借鉴的。传言因为我弟弟的老婆希望这房子转到他们夫妻的名字下面可以让她当老婆的有一份安全感，所以我父母两人都是被一纸死亡证给逐出了我父母用自己工资买的那套房子， 也就是说从那时起就可能永远就没有了一个栖身之所，也从此没有了退休金及点滴存款可以买口饭吃，除非我能及时找到他们。而我是在那房子已经转入我弟弟名下之后才于2015年我自己打电话给我弟弟才被允许听说了我父亲“2013年10月已经去世”的消息。自从我弟弟结婚，我就已经听说了我父母和我弟弟夫妻为这房产证应该在谁名下的争执。我现在还在心存希望我父母还在，就因为我办理信托时也一并托付了对他们的照顾，你们也一定听到了广播剧上来自中国以及中国政府的诅咒“居然还敢幻想你父母还活着？”我那有可能不痛骂这一届的中国政府作为所谓的政府职能机构，却居然完全不在乎我父母“死前”都是在中国法律面前平等的中国公民，作为政府机构却居然完全不在乎我父母作为中国公民时流下的眼泪。）
My younger brother may understand his current situation is the price he needs to pay to get to me as well as the wealth. But, I excluded next kin inheriting entirely and he is never a beneficiary by will to any of the Trust I inherited. Also, he is not the person has the capability to help himself to change his current situation if he has any money at all. According to rumors I hear, his current situation is pretty much a publicly humiliated beggar to live one his wife's charity but pay his own money to raise his wife's own child. I currently hold my gift to him, originally sized ￥500Million(exchange rate $1= ￥6-ish), because that may endanger me and possibly my alive parents. And the official reason for this withholding that I listed on my web blog is he is not eligible to the gifting because that is the gift of appreciation to my relatives who have treated me or my father as a relative.（我弟弟有可能是认为他现在的处境是在卧薪尝胆才能有一天可以拿到我所继承的财产。但是，我弟弟从来不是我的所继承任何一家信托按照遗嘱所指定的受益人，我本人也彻底拒绝了我的任何亲属作为我财产的继承人。而他本人就算有钱也不是有能力可依靠自己改善他目前生活状态的人。依据我所听到的传言，他目前的生活状态也就是被公开羞辱是靠他老婆苟且偷生而已但必须花钱养着他老婆和别的男人所生的孩子。我目前是决定扣留我准备送他的原定5亿人民币的礼物（外汇比：1美金=6元多人名币）就是因为给他这钱根本就是给我自己和我父母增加人身安全的危险。我博客上的正式理由就是我的这份礼物是送给把我或者我的父亲当作自己亲人的那些亲眷的以表达感谢的。）
According to rumor, I have been harassed and threatened so much by him and his marriage associated already. According to rumors, my younger brother's wife mothers a child from a Beijing man whose wife mothers four children. According to rumors, one of these four children is from a 2004's military guy Liu, Yuan(刘源) or one of this Liu, Yuan's relatives. Also, this Liu, Yuan has an actress wife who has a director lover and relatives work for the Chinese consulate Chicagoago, etc. All participated in this radio program's public blackmails regarding who I am, I assumed the purpose is to take over the wealth I inherited as you have heard this morning.（根据传言，我已经被他本人一及他的婚姻亲朋骚扰的很离谱了。根据传言，我弟弟的老婆的孩子亲爹是个北京男人，这个北京男人的老婆有四个孩子，其中的一个是2004年传说中的那个名人后裔的军人刘源的或其亲属的孩子。而这个军人刘源，有个当演员的妻子和一个做导演的男人是情侣，这个演员妻子的娘家亲戚还是芝加哥中领馆的。都和这个广播剧的编造制作并公开播出对我方敏的羞辱谩骂有关，我估计就是为了抢夺我所继承的财产吧。）
So, I have to restate here that（所以我再次宣布我的声明：）
I excluded next kin inheriting entirely and my younger brother is never a beneficiary by will to any of the Trust I inherited.（我弟弟从来不是我的所继承任何一家信托按照遗嘱所指定的受益人，我本人也彻底拒绝了我的任何亲属作为我财产的继承人。）
I am the sole beneficiary person of the Trusts I inherited according to each settler's will, and I have nothing to do with any business investing activities that any of my Trusts have been conducting.（我是我所继承的所有每一个信托的唯一受益人，我和我所继承的所有每一家信托的任何投资经营活动都从来没有任何关系。）
Some said, will I be concerned after this morning's broadcasting that my wealth may be withheld to prevent my threating-ability? I say how can my wealth have any threating-ability when my Trusts only have few investments in any country that has the military & public safety which is supported by the entire country to protect anyone on the soil of the country.（有人说，今天早上的广播剧都播成这样了，你还不担心你的钱被以担心你钱太多威胁社会安全为名给扣留了？我说，在每一个有军警的国家，我的信托就只有有限的投资，而该国家的军警是由其全体人民提供的税收财务所支持的，该国家的军警也是有能力保护在其领土上的居民的。我信托的那点投资能有什么威胁？）
----October 3rd, 2018
10-02-2018 Just a small note
The huge difference is: 1921's communist party leaders enjoy benefit-loss analysis based on how to benefit the Chinese people even though their calculation may have been so not reasonable; 1989's student group's benefit-loss analysis, from my own impression, is all about what themselves want to be, what themselves want to have, what themselves truly should deserve.
How about myself? I am very protective of my own interest, but I don't step on other people's toes as well, seldom at least.
How about myself? I am very protective of my own interest, but I don't step on other people's toes as well, seldom at least.
----10-02-2018
听说吧，在中国，89年学运的烙印就是89年以后就有一批的愤青，海外89年学运人士就是国内的街头混混或者文痞形象。我是1996年来美国，听说那时的89年学运人士就已经是海外华裔社区普遍认可的头疼和脑热。估计是一群胸怀大志高挑远望，就是不接地气，剩下的就是一地烂摊子。国内估计是换个工作不容易，所以空有一腔宏愿，单位领导就是绝不再给机会，海外换个工作非常容易，也就是“此处不留爷，自有留爷处。”
至于我自己，风格就是没什么声音，在中国城也就是吃吃饭，买买菜，除了来找茬的华人，确实没有任何因为工作学习及生活原因所形成的华裔社交圈，那些哭嚎为我头疼脑热看不下去的华人都是自己找上门来找茬的。我是早就已经就那些专门上门找茬的可能原因报警了。
在经历了自2004年就已经开始的华裔社区针对我方敏婚姻的仇恨，如果现在中国中央及各地方政府或者任何华人用任何语言说一句”衷心希望你能有一个幸福的婚姻“，那是全世界各族裔各种语言的人民都是不需要任何翻译解释就已经知道的绝对的彻头彻尾的谎言。这也是我方敏对于海内外华人普遍都有花痴精神病而且症状非常严重最深刻的认知。”没有了你们，永远不意味着失去“是我方敏作为中国政府自2004年以后通过中国外交部在海内外恶意组织制造事件的受害人就事件的真实态度立场，我方敏也永远不会认为哭丧干嚎从此“祝你还能有个婚姻”有可能会是任何非精神病状态人士对事件处理的方式。
至于洛克菲勒家族在2012年我有自己小孩是真实的影像都已经公开宣布的情况下，还需要在2013年开始发情干嚎的真实原因究竟是什么，我已经在美国报警。
----2018年10月2日。
听说吧，在中国，89年学运的烙印就是89年以后就有一批的愤青，海外89年学运人士就是国内的街头混混或者文痞形象。我是1996年来美国，听说那时的89年学运人士就已经是海外华裔社区普遍认可的头疼和脑热。估计是一群胸怀大志高挑远望，就是不接地气，剩下的就是一地烂摊子。国内估计是换个工作不容易，所以空有一腔宏愿，单位领导就是绝不再给机会，海外换个工作非常容易，也就是“此处不留爷，自有留爷处。”
至于我自己，风格就是没什么声音，在中国城也就是吃吃饭，买买菜，除了来找茬的华人，确实没有任何因为工作学习及生活原因所形成的华裔社交圈，那些哭嚎为我头疼脑热看不下去的华人都是自己找上门来找茬的。我是早就已经就那些专门上门找茬的可能原因报警了。
在经历了自2004年就已经开始的华裔社区针对我方敏婚姻的仇恨，如果现在中国中央及各地方政府或者任何华人用任何语言说一句”衷心希望你能有一个幸福的婚姻“，那是全世界各族裔各种语言的人民都是不需要任何翻译解释就已经知道的绝对的彻头彻尾的谎言。这也是我方敏对于海内外华人普遍都有花痴精神病而且症状非常严重最深刻的认知。”没有了你们，永远不意味着失去“是我方敏作为中国政府自2004年以后通过中国外交部在海内外恶意组织制造事件的受害人就事件的真实态度立场，我方敏也永远不会认为哭丧干嚎从此“祝你还能有个婚姻”有可能会是任何非精神病状态人士对事件处理的方式。
至于洛克菲勒家族在2012年我有自己小孩是真实的影像都已经公开宣布的情况下，还需要在2013年开始发情干嚎的真实原因究竟是什么，我已经在美国报警。
----2018年10月2日。
10-01-2018 Speaking in a totally different language (对牛弹琴)
I have this urgent pressure that I have to go to a law school because I have this horrible experience that I poured out everything I know which so acknowledged by so many people as "full of information" but responded by law representative as "no valuable information". There are so many doubts in so many people after they heard of my story that if this is a so corrupted country already, the comfort is there are also a lot of law people agree my story is so informational and so verifiable. The reason: these agreeable law people are investigators, the no-valuable-information law representatives are attorneys. So, I decided I am going to law school.
I need to learn attorneys' language to understand my representing attorneys, this is inspired by the fact I finally can speak in the language that an MBA graduated can understand. Attorneys' profession is waiting for me to provide information to answer my question, the investigators' profession specialized in finding information themselves as long as I can provide some clues. My frustration is I don't speak attorneys' language to know what information is what attorneys would expect.
I am lucky I can speak three professional languages now. Such as, my blog article about JPMChase is very understandable to a computer person by taking a look at a table published in that article, to an MBA graduated after reading my account of what happened, but remains a huge puzzle of "why the change is so phenomenal, is that a political movement?" to a lot. The new cancer technology is the same, it is so easy to a lot of medical background people by looking at the table at the bottom of that article. I kept it that way to save it to those who really would read through this article ignoring the fact I am new to English writing.
Following are some examples of speaking in a totally different language:
I keep saying I was at my green card application representing attorney's office when I attended 2004's teleconferences, and I heard later that I inherited this and that. The attorneys' common reaction is: "You don't have an inheriting by heard of it."
- So, I learned to rephrase it as: I went to this attorney's office at this address with my driver license on me to attend these 2004's teleconferences with this attorney's accompany the entire time, this attorney's office has the full collection of my valid identification legal documents.
Attorneys kept asking me "where is your Trust registered if you did inherit a Trust, the setup date or the Trustee information, etc.". I kept on politely clarifying I don't encourage to find out where the Trust is because of too much harassment already, and I have already provided all the references I know of. Attorneys' common reaction is "I can't help you."
- So, I learned to wait for my entrusting attorneys and provide information as much as I could to law representatives for inquiry purpose, because all I try to do is an inquiry on my living expenses that already paid-out by the Trust. If I can rephrase my inquiry to help myself? I probably need to learn that from a law school.
The anger why I kept on spending from this or that person's family wealth's business investment.
- I learned to call this or that person a confused person, and learned I am a beneficiary of some Trusts is precisely the reason I have no idea what is the confusion.
- So, I say please don't disrupt any of my already paid-in-full services, and please direct any or all the questions to the paying company that has caused this spending confusion. All these store credit cards (store gift cards), as you heard in this morning's broadcasting, are paid-in-full services to my exclusive usage which have been arranged by my entrusting group, please do not harass these stores who are not the paying company but the service provider.
- All I can help is to say please check if it is the same company by checking the registration license number that is printed on the license, it is the same as the motor vehicle's plate number or title number which can identify a car from all the cars even if all made by the same maker in the same year and registered at the same address.
The anger from China on why I put money into my own wallet.（来自中国的一片愤怒“凭什么把钱放进你自己的钱包。”）
- I learned to ask "what money, what amount, why I shouldn't". So, I ask please consult laws if you can read in Chinese before accusing me such. I say to private assistant Ding's biological family and associated: "Private assistant Ding is a dead body, the same as Amei Mao, and Zhiren Fang. Good or bad, they are all dead now. Now is already 2018, Amei Mao's vagina is not in-tasting by any of your mouths, Amei Mao's blood is not running in any of your veins. Amei Mao is truly my birth grandmother but I refuse to acknowledge your kind anything other than the disgusting low cast.（我学会了追问“什么钱，多少钱，为什么我不应该把这笔钱放进我自己的钱包？”所以，我说你们要是认识中文，请先参阅中国的相关法律，再提出你们的指责。我对丁姓私人助理的亲朋家人说：“丁姓私人助理已经和方智仁毛阿妹一样都是死人了，有感情没感情都是已经在阎王爷那里了。现在是2018年，毛阿妹的卵巢入口没在你们家任何一个人的嘴里舔着，毛阿妹的血也没在你们家任何一个人的身上流着，我方敏认毛阿妹是我的亲生奶奶，可我就是不认你们这群下三烂什么都不是的脏货。”)
----October 1st, 2004
Reason:
- In the United States, the political group listens to the American "We the people" and to respond by making laws to protect the interest of "We the people". If "We the people" disagree on how the political group understands "We the people", "We the people" can demand to vote if a new law should be passed.
- The government group enforces existing laws that already made by the political group. If "We the people" disagree on how the government group understands the existing laws, the supreme court is the authority to explain existing laws that already made by the political group.
*"We the people" is from the U.S. Constitution.
09-30-2018 Why a glamor talented big name's daughter-in-law kept on challenging a daughter from a completely different house?
Heard this morning's broadcasting that glamor and talented Ina has been on this radio producing efforts that I accused as blackmail. Being talented herself, why she has problems with hard-earned fame? I search online and found out her husband carries the famous family resemblance obviously. She is a wife to a big name in a happy marriage probably is the reason for all these challenges.
I am an heir-daughter of a long history name whose privileges are protected, she is a daughter-in-law to a big wealthy business name who deserves the same privileges. This longtime struggle may have been shared among a lot of daughters-in-law who mistook my privileges are from being important enough to the big names' family seniors. This is a huge misunderstanding that my "huge success" in 2004 came from the romance, July 1st of 2004 was a big day in my life because it was the next day I inherited my grandfathers' blessing. That day was the day it was all about me and all about what I wanted because that day was my inheriting shopping spray day. My hard-earned fame glory day was on June 30th of 2004 when I participated in the conversation that led to the smartphone's invention.
I am a daughter of a big historic name whose privileges have already been acknowledged since I was born so that I was relaxed on the desire to prove to everyone I know that I have inherited some handsome blessing. I was a computer science engineer who also graduated from a medical college and had learned the basic medical system that my preference on spending my money is different to a lot of girls. I enjoy fashion, but fanciful life is not what I am not familiar with in my family's stories, I paid attention to my overall health and a healthy lifestyle more logically, of course, was the reason that my handsome spending on my own health and my own well-being has been invisible to a lot of people. My living expenses are not supposed to be shabby either, I am current just caught up in the situation called "impacted by the ownership confusion".
Being a daughter, I have learned a lot of family education on my way of growing up. One of the teachings my father had taught me was trying to listen instead of kept on expressing. So, I have learned to listen to other people's thoughts and I have learned how to recognize what sparks in other people's expression, which has been so beneficial to my own expression when I have my own thoughts. I would assume how not easy it has been to build up such a big family name has been part of the family education a daughter has brought up with, which must be such a treasure a daughter-in-law who must have been so envious of.
I have been constantly insulted to prove that I have some big money visibly, and I can imagine the pressure a lot of daughters-in-law may have been under to prove that they do have marriages truly appreciated by the big family names. I have been annoyed by all these competitions & challenges regarding who I am, and I don't have any prescription for any of them to help them to ease tons of pressures that drive them to challenge as such, but I would say it is better not to extend this pressure-handling to the family's business-investment because the old saying I listen to: "Don't party at the place you eat".
----Sept 30th, 2018
