About Radio Program (VIII) ---- 关于广播剧（八）
Chinese version
Chronicle Note
**I have not heard one single episode of this radio program myself for a lot of reasons. To do a radio program majorly featuring me was discussed on 07/01/2004 conference call. The radio program has been produced by United States 106.7FM or Clear Channel and on air since 2005??suppose??. I am a Chinese, the major featured person(suppose). Following are what I gathered from impacts of being the major featured person and may not correct. Please contact me at somebodyinMA@gmail.com if the content is seriously incorrect and please provide references including broadcasting channel and time, thanks forward.
老爸爸方文海，你其实是被我给信托了， 我所信托的财产很安全，你也很安全，请尽快和我联系，或者联系南京紫台025-8333-2227，请赶紧和美国领事馆联系(任何地方的美领馆， 上海021-8011-2400），不用担心你是否有有效证件证明身份，他们可以做DNA鉴定来确定你和我的亲生父女关系的。如果老爸爸你因为自己的亲身经历，想在国内找找妈妈王博贤的消息，也最好是在和美国领事馆核实妈妈是否已经在美国之后，或者至少和我方敏取得联系之后，再一起商量商量如何找妈妈并和妈妈取得联系。紫金山天文台http://www.pmo.cas.cn/ztjj/lxfs/
你也可以查一下你是否有如下医院的医疗保险：上海国际医院名单， 索引文章)
03-28-2017 Cheung Kong Holdings is not Hong Kong Chung(长江实业不是香港长实）
Heard this morning's anger of Hong Kong Chung.
My response: My sincere apology. The company my Hong Kong trust has been investing is the parent company of Cheung Kong Holdings(长江实业）, not the Hong Kong Chung（长实公司). The $500 Million check that lady account payable specialist signed in 2004 was from Cheung Kong Holdings(长江实业).
Cheung Kong Holdings is now a restructured public trading company has a new name Cheung Kong Group.
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cheung_Kong_Holdings )
I used abbreviated Chinese name's(长实） English translation caused this confusion. So sorry I have not visited Hong Kong yet.
The Hong Kong Trust was set up by Zhiren Fang(方智仁). I am the sole beneficiary person "Female Palm" of this Hong Kong trust according to Zhiren Fang's(方智仁) will.
----March 28th, 2018
听说了今天早上有关香港长实的愤怒。
我的回应：很抱歉。我的香港信托所投资的公司是香港长江实业的母公司，不是长实公司。那个付款账簿女士于2004年开具的5亿美金是香港长江实业的支票。
香港长江实业于2015年已重组成长江集团。
( https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E9%95%B7%E6%B1%9F%E5%AF%A6%E6%A5%AD )
困扰是因为我是用了其中文简写（长实）做的英文翻译造成的。很不好意思我还没去过香港。
该香港信托由方智仁设立。按照方智仁遗嘱，我是该香港信托唯一受益人“女掌”。
----2018年3月28日。
03-26-2018 All about that $500 Million ---- Cheung Kong Holdings(长江实业) never did money laundry （都是有关五亿美金的--长江实业从未涉入任何洗钱行为）
Heard this morning's talk about HongKong's $500 Million.（中文附后）
My response: I heard the accountant wrote the check from Hong Kong Cheung (香港长实) company's operating account instead of my Hongkong Trust's capital account in the company caused money laundry confusion.
That is the reason there were arguments you heard on the radio about the money should be from the piles after-registry-closed. The piles after-registry-closed mean the money is the profiting from the business operation.
Operating account means the money in business operation which is the money in the registry. Capital account means the investor's profiting share which is the piles after-registry-closed.
So, what the accountant stated this morning was that she had signed that $500Million check upon my Hong Kong Trust's request from the registry instead of the piles after-registry-closed.
I assume she must have expected that would be a very high return investment opportunity to miss for the company. Well, you heard the argument from Mr. Walton to clarify that is the unlikely situation. And the legal documentation prepared by my Hong Kong Trust made a verify appropriate specification which was "to invest this $500 Million at an average yield".
I heard this $500Million had been adjusted to the capital account is the reason Mr. Walton cannot return this money back to the company. *The $500Million was owned lawfully by my Hong Kong Trust in its capital account after the accounting adjustment and transferred to the United States afterward, this $500Million should be given to me as the transferring legal documentation specified.
Conclusion: Cheung Kong Holdings (长江实业) never did money laundry.
The reason I requested this $500Million from my Hong Kong Trust to the United States was that all the hostilities I felt regarding how I did my inheriting day shopping spree. I did not know that shopping spree was either understood "the female butts money I was demanding" or understood "the female butts money I was given". But I felt the pressure of pushing me to reveal the account numbers with the saving amount to prove that I do have some money, and I wanted to gift some to my father-side relatives as part of my inheriting shopping spree, so I asked Hong Kong Trust to transfer some money to the United States to invest that everyone know I do have the money I inherited and that is it. And I told my father-side relatives I would gift them ￥500Million RMB when I go home.
I had no intention to reveal my private savings in any way, that includes this Hong Kong Trust. But the pressure I felt was from the China community or the Chinese government was the reason I requested this money to be transferred from the Chinese run Hong Kong Trust.
I heard in that legal documentation accompanied with the $500 Million transfer from Hong Kong, it is specified that Mr. Walton should give the $500 Million with the investment return to me. And that is the legal issue that I have with Mr. Walton after he announced his giving of $700 Million to Albert Gore on the radio.
I have to clarify that Mr. Walton does have a lot of his own money to spend, but Mr. Walton is not the authorized and/or privileged person to spend my money.
I heard rumors that my father-side relatives only willing to let Albert Gore or his representative(s) handle my gift-giving related matter. Well, if this rumor* is true, I would need legal documentation of their willingness, and I understand that is their free wishes to reject my gifting.
On July 1st of 2004 when that money-pool was announced, I made myself very clear that I would not take any money from the money-pool of other people's donation-deposit and I would not put a penny (or more) into that money-pool as well. I have called laws help on legal issues related to this money-pool.
Albert Gore was never the authorized and/or privileged person to receive money on my behave.
Albert Gore is not the authorized and/or privileged person to receive money on my behave.
Albert Gore will never be the authorized and/or privileged person to receive money on my behave.
* The rumor I heard is Mr. Walton would not give me that $500Million with its investment return, Albert Gore willing give $400Million to my father-side relatives from the $700Million he had received from Mr. Walton on the same day Mr. Walton announced on the radio. So, he can keep a $300Million. I reject this unauthorized arrangement of my money of the $500Million transferred from Hong Kong together with its investment return. I called law enforcement's help.
----March 26th, 2018
听说了今天早上提到的香港那五亿美金。
我的回应：我听说会计开5亿美金支票的账户是公司的营运账户而不是公司的股东账户是造成香港长实公司是否有涉及洗钱传言的原因。
这也是为什么你们听到了“那钱应该是从银箱锁了以后的那一堆钱里拿出来”的争执。银箱锁了结账以后的那一堆钱指的就是公司营运的利润。
公司营运账户指的是公司做生意所使用的账户也就是收银员的收银箱。公司的股东账户就是公司投资人的利润分成也就是收银员锁了收银箱结账以后要交给老板的钱。
所以，那个会计今天早上所陈述的就是她是从收银员的收银箱里拿的那五亿美金，而不是从收银箱锁了结账以后要交给老板的那一堆里拿的。
我估计那个会计师肯定是以为那是个好的不得了的投资机会应该要让公司来赚这笔投资利得的钱。可惜你们听到沃顿先生澄清这是不太可能的。而且我的香港信托所准备的五亿美金转账所需的法律文件上也只是非常恰当的标明了“用这五亿美金进行平均利得的投资”。
结论：长江实业从未涉入任何洗钱行为。
我听说这五亿美金已经被调整成了股东账户的支出是沃顿先生不能把钱退回公司的原因。*经过账目调整之后，这五亿美金是转入了我的香港信托所合法拥有的香港长实公司的上级总公司里的公司股东账户并从这个账户里转账美国的，这个五亿美金应该按照当时转账所附的法律文件的规定交付我使用。
我提出要我的香港信托转账五亿美金到美国的原因就是因为我感受到对我那天大把花钱的敌意。我当时还不知道我做我的“继承了大血拼”是被理解成了“我在要女人的屁股钱”或者是“有钱男人在发放女人的屁股钱”。但我能感觉到要搜了我的银行来查我的银行账号和存款来看我到底有没有钱有多少钱的那份压力，而我本人也想给乘着我正好是在做“继承了大买东西”，就顺便送我父亲那边的几个亲戚一些礼物，所以我就让我的香港信托转账五亿美金到美国以示我确实有钱，我有已经继承了的财产，对我花钱的敌意应该到此为止。我还告诉了我父亲方面的那几个亲戚，等我回家的时候我会送给他们每家五亿人民币。*转账五亿美金的法律文件上所注明的投资时间已结束。
我没有任何意愿公布我的私人财务情况以及这家香港信托的财务。但当时那份到来自华裔社区或者中国政府的莫名压力是我要求从华人经营的这家香港信托转账钱财的原因。
我听说在这五亿美金转账时所附的法律文件里有明确指明沃顿先生应该把这五亿美金以及投资利得都交付我方敏。沃顿先生在广播上擅自宣布他已交付给阿尔贝特·高尔其中的七亿美金引发我和沃顿先生之间的法律纠纷。
我必须澄清沃顿先生自己确实有很多钱，但很遗憾沃顿先生不是一个得到授权或者是有特权可以花我的钱的人。
我听说有传言我父亲那边的几个亲戚表态只愿意由阿尔贝特·高尔或者阿尔贝特·高尔的代表处理我送礼物给他们的事宜。如果是这样的话，我要求他们出示表达他们明确意愿的法律文件，我认为他们这是在表达他们拒绝我的礼物的自由意愿。
在2004年7月1日宣布那个蓄钱池的时候，我就已经明确表态我不会从这个蓄钱池里拿别人捐得一分钱，也不会往这个蓄钱池里放一分（或更多) 钱。我已经就我的一些智慧产权收入被存入这个蓄钱池里被瓜分的传言报警处理。
阿尔贝特·高尔过去从来不是一个得到授权或者是有特权可以替我接受钱财的人。
阿尔贝特·高尔现在不是一个得到授权或者是有特权可以替我接受钱财的人。
阿尔贝特·高尔永远不会是一个得到授权或者是有特权可以替我接受钱财的人。
*我听到的传言是沃顿先生是不会按照转账所附的法律文件所规定的将五亿美金及利得交付我方敏。阿尔贝特·高尔愿意从他已经在沃顿先生宣布当天就收到的其中的七亿美金里支付我父亲方面的那几个亲戚共四亿美金。也就是他自己留下那三亿美金。我拒绝这种未经授权擅自处理我的香港信托所转出的5亿美金及其利得的做法。已报警处理。
----2018年3月26日。
03-25-2018 Hong Kong is not money laundry and Where is the comfortableness come from? ( 香港从来没有洗过钱以及哪来的这份理所应当啊？）
Heard confusion about Hongkong's $500 Million(中文附后）.
My response: I heard HongKong investment's management called Hongkong police on July 2nd of 2004 about the possible money laundry regarding my request to transfer this $500Million to the United States on July 1st of 2004.
What I heard is it has already been verified that Hongkong investment's management had transferred this $500Million to the United States as I requested, around July 10th of 2004 or so, after Hongkong law enforcement clarified the money laundry confusion. American Mr. Walton had already verified he had received this $500Million in July of 2004 and he had invested this $500 Million according to what was specified in the legal documentation that accompanied with this money transfer.
My trust was set up as an entity which means the capitals from the trust was the investment instead of a loan.
The conclusion: My request to transfer $500Million from the Hong Kong trust I inherited to the United States was never a money laundry.
----March 25th, 2018
Heard this morning's talk about why the comfortableness to make claims when there's no ground(中文附后）.
My response: Let me share some of my frustration and some rumors I heard of to help everyone to analyze why.
I had met that three notorious Chinese guys in 1988, 1989 and 1991, just met once each (two in-person) and that is it. All three were in a 1989's meeting when I was a college student in Shanghai that all three had heard I have huge wealth to inherit abroad, all three had moved on with their own life after that "met incidence", but they all have developed this comfortableness of being the master of me. In 2004, they played this same trick, and you already heard this comfortableness on the radio so loudly.
I recently heard my father's college romance story was similar. I heard my father invited his college girlfriend to visit his family in Shanghai around 1960, and my grandfather treated her well. I heard she can't forget the luxury places (of that time) she had chances to go to even after all these years. Well, after all these unforgettable experiences, she left my father and married someone else in Beijing very easily after just a year of her college graduation. And I heard after she became the mother of three children who all have nothing to do with my father biologically, she took my mother's wedding gift sent by my grandfather's friends so comfortably and kept declaring she got that was because she is the "true love" of my father. I heard her children are now demanding to have a share of my inherited wealth because they are the true beloved of their mother who is the "true love" of my father.
On the radio, you must have heard so many denouncing statements with a master's tone just because "met in a 2004's meeting and there was a matrimony discussion in the meeting" incidence. And they all deserve to have a saying over my lawful wealth, it is obviously not just saying over my wealth but the decision power.
Who empowered them? Who is in what position to empower them? How can they be empowered over my finance without their own access to it? Obviously, the person or the group who has been empowering them has no valid access to my lawfully inherited lawful wealth.
How about my grandfather's wealth? My father did not get a penny from my grandfather when my grandfather passed away in 1965, and there are tons of rumors about that. One of the rumor is that that college ex-girlfriend in Beijing had received my father's share. If this rumor is true, I doubted that giving was from my grandfather because my grandfather should have known that my father did not visit Beijing at each time when she was conceived of her children as a married woman since 1961.
The Chinese government has this strong argument how could I possibly have inheritable if I grew up no money in China. Well, if you heard my mother did not receive any wedding gifts from my father's siblings or my grandfather's friends, and only used one (switched from the new by her eldest sister) from her maiden family, why you think I could possibly receive anything from abroad? Till now, my family has not heard what else has been taken so comfortably or by whom other than the foreign-made-watch taken by that ex-girlfriend from Beijing.
Exactly, who is the person supporting all these ridiculous unlawful confusion to have this comfortableness to trigger all these impacted such anger?
----March 25th, 2018
听说了有关香港那个5亿美金的困扰。
我的回应：我听说香港企业的管理层在2004年7月2日就我于2004年7月1日提出要转5亿美金到美国的要求是否是在洗钱通报了香港警方。
我听说已经证实的事实是，香港企业的管理层在香港警方澄清洗钱怀疑后，已于2004年7月10日前后将这笔5亿美金的钱款按照我的要求转入美国交付沃顿先生进行投资。美国人沃顿先生也已经证实他已于2004年7月收到这笔由香港转入的5亿美金款项并已经按照这笔5亿美金转账时所附法律文件的要求进行了投资。
我爷爷替我设立信托时是将我的信托注册登记为法人机构的，也就是说我的信托所放出的钱款是投资项目而不是贷款项目。
结论：我所要求的从我所继承的设在香港的信托里转入美国进行投资的5亿美金从来不是洗钱行为。
----2018年3月25日。
听说了今天早上所提到的“这些态度要求根本就没有任何理由，哪来的这份理所应当？”
我的回应：让我也来投诉投诉，再听听我都听说了些什么，大家一起来分析分析怎么回事啊。
我是在1988，1989 和1991年认识了那三个臭名昭著的中国名流男子，每个人都是只交往过一次（就是认识的那一次），只见过其中两个，仅此而已。三个都参加了1989年的全国高校会议，我当时是上海一所大学的学生，三个也都在那次会上听说了我会有大笔在海外的钱可以继承，三个也都是在认识我之后都活的各自各精彩都有他们自己的私人生活，但都有一种他们已经是我的主子的态度。2004年，他们好像玩的是同一种手法，你们现在也都在广播里听到这份理所应当的态度了。
03-24-2018 Early investment is very important
Heard this morning's talk about my girl's skincare annoyed a lot of girls' mothers.
My response: My skin-caring for my girl is because I was a girl. I want my girl to have what I did not have at her age.
I am a medical college pharmacology major graduated that I always pay attention to health professionals' advise. Skin-care professionals are skin healthcare professionals. The advice I listen to is advice given to mothers of girls, not riches. And I did not discuss how expensive it has to be to make my skin-care wish for my girl effective.
I am sorry to my son that I am a girl and I don't know what can be beneficial to a boy for his lifetime if special attention paid at his early ages, other than regular attentions have paid on health and interests-developing to both of them.
Another thing I know paying attention to at early time makes a huge difference in a child's life is the Education saving advise from financial professionals.
If the parents can jointly save $500/month between the time after the child was born and before entering elementary school, and find an educational account that has the yield of 5%, only 4 years saving like this can make $40,000 for the child's college education.
----March, 24th, 2018
Heard this morning's talk about how dare I can insult a wife knowing that is a woman who has a husband.
03-20-2018 Two different Accounts & Why my lawful private wealth’s inheriting is Chinese government's Sovereign Issue?(两个账本&我私人财产继承怎么成了中国政府的主权问题了？）
Heard the arguments about why I echo R's claim on romance but reject Pejoves' saying of my money.
My response: The difference is who has the ownership or privilege or authority to announce what.
Any R does have the authority and privilege in his own private compartment.
A Jessica Pejoves recruited actressing "law enforcement" does not have the authority to state anything about my lawful money or may lawful blood association.
I heard this morning's arguing parties were some O'Connors and some Pejoves. Only one line "Min Fang has her money in the United States" was said by the law enforcement who is investigating my case.
The entire time, it has been these O'Connors and these Pejoves arguing if I possibly truly have any biological children.
I assumed the reason that these Pejoves and these O'Connor kept trying to have sayings over my matter is that my yearly providing ($400 Million medical and rumored $400 Million living ) was misunderstood as the increase of their agreed-upon providing.
Their agreed-upon providing is part of local American companies' expense which is deducted from the local American companies' yearly earnings before the local American companies paying their American business tax.
My yearly providing is paid from the business profit of the local American companies that needed to be handed-in to their British parent companies. The business profit is the remaining of local American companies' yearly earnings after local American companies paid their American business tax.
My yearly providing has nothing to do with their agreed-upon providing. My yearly providing cannot be confused with their agreed-upon providing.
----March 20th, 2018
Two different Accounts
My response: I got into the fight with O'Connors about who owns that American Fund. If my providing has not been taken by some O'Connors as rumored, I have no reason to get into this fight. The rumored providing paid for my living cost in 2016 was paid expense from its British parent fund's (owner's) equity account as instructed by its British parent fund. Theirs is from local American Fund's operating expense.
----February 8th, 2018
This American Fund's British Parent Fund is owned by the same French Fund that owns the British East India Company Financier.
----February 11th, 2018
This above accounts issue is also the issue between some Pejoves names in the U.S with me by rumor. In the U.S, my providing and theirs providing both deducted from local American Fund's parent British Fund's capital account. But in Britain, my providing is paid by the British Fund's parent French Fund so that my providing is deducted from the British Fund's parent French Fund's Capital Account, and theirs is deducted from the local British Fund's operating expense accounts.
Explanation: What I have inherited are trusts that my birth grandfathers set up for me before I was born.
Another way to get my providing is to let my trust wire that money directly to me which is seldom used by investors because of inconvenience caused by tedious procedures. Also, the Investor's tax for each providing check is paid to the country according to its signing local company's geographic location.
----February 27th, 2018
Heard there is a French name now that is so confusing to his girlfriend for the similar speculation.
My response: I am on that French Fund's Spanish Investor's spending account. I have nothing to do with the French young and handsome who I have not heard of yet or met in person yet.
A lot of people are speculating how long it will take the deserved to have some money group to discover a confused girlfriend of a Spanish name to miserable everybody.
----March 17th, 2018
Albert Gore has nothing to do with me for him to say anything on my any matter. And I refuse to let Albert Gore have any saying over my any matter. Please contact 911 police if he insists on you to listen to his saying about my matter which certainly would put you into legal troubles, or call his psychiatrist daughter or any psychiatrist about his severe illusion that he can have any saying over my any matter. He is probably having some sever psychiatry medical situation called Delusional disorder if he indeed just won't stop insisting on having saying over not-his-to-say my any matter, please call 911 or the psychiatrist daughter who will certainly help Albert Gore.
----February 1st, 2018
Rumored the reason I should not be acknowledged as the Creator of Beijing Olympic Opening is that if FBI did not record, then my creative ideas won't be produced.
My response: This is a true statement that obviously and definitely would results in Beijing Olympic Game opening would never be presented as it was.
The 2008 Beijing Olympic Game Opening is what it was is because that is produced by my creative ideas. The creator of 2008 Beijing Olympic Opening is Min Fang is a matter of fact that no decent lawful person can deny, not to mention those claimed talented enough to lead a Nation. The opportunity to lead a Nation to serve the people is not the same meaning of being the driving force to violate laws to rob the people. I am an individual and this is my individual case but I won't be the only individual as part of the people's definition that being robbed if government official position means the power to perform the robbery to the people.
-----February 10th, 2018
Heard this morning's talk about Chinese Premier's Sovereign talk regarding the trust my birth grandfather set up for me in Hong Kong.
My response: Even according to People's Republic of China's laws, the matter is a private wealth inheriting matter, why it becomes such a Chinese Sovereign issue? Is this imply that current administration of Chinese government is the government that "sharing one wife already that so should share everybody's wealth as well"?
I do not have any association including no sexual association with this administration of China's sharing one wife government.
I refuse my lawful private wealth to be "shared".
I make my comment about this administration of the People's Republic of China's government according to their own logic. They swear my name in order to own my lawful private wealth illegally, I shit their names in order to protect my own lawful private wealth.
I am a such famous "fake talented" because my intellectual income deserved to be owned by whoever wants some easy money, I am such a famous unwanted "female" because my providing from my own birth grandfathers' blessing deserved to be understood as "some rich man's donation" that should be owned by whoever has a used female underwear.
I am sick of the shouts "As long as I am the one still in his bed and mother his child(ren), I won't be the one who is afraid".
I have no need to shout now but to make myself clear "as long as I have the same size and same quality level of attorney service as that him, why I need to be afraid? I send you both to the laws."
----03-08-2018
听说了今天早上所播出的中国政府总理所谈参与争夺我爷爷在香港替我设立的信托是在捍卫中国主权的说法。
我的回应: 即使是按照中华人民共和国的法律，我爷爷替我在香港设立的信托也是非常明确的私人财产继承事宜，为什么就变成了这一届中国政府的主权之争？这是在说这一届的中国共产党政府是个“既然已经共了一个妻当然应该共所有人的产”的政府吗？”
我1996年离开中国时的中国共产党政府没有共妻，我也没觉着当时的政府想共我的产。 我现在已经是美国公民，我和中国习近平李克强共妻政府的任何官员都没有任何因公因私关系或者性关系。
我拒绝我自己的私人合法财产被“共产”。
我就中国政府所发表的言论完全遵循中国政府的思维逻辑。中国习近平李克强的共妻政府为掠夺我的合法私有财产对我进行谩骂羞辱的所谓演出，我为捍卫我自己合法私有财产不被公然掠夺，我也是痛骂这届中国习近平李克强的共妻政府根本就是一群只有一个妓院妓女破鞋婊子才会肯让他们下种否则就是断子绝孙的一群婊子养的杂种烂货。我也是会痛骂这届中国政府就只是一群只会满嘴舔着“髀眼价值，髀眼知识，髀眼能力，髀眼道德，髀眼荣宗”的一群没有任何正经女人愿意替他们生儿育女的下三烂猪屎而已。
我现在成了一个这么有名的“假冒伪造”就是因为有些想拿容易钱的人“就是要定了”我的智慧产权收入，我是个这么有名的“没人要的女人”就是因为我自己亲生爷爷留给我的信托所提供的生活费用就是应该被理解成“什么有钱人的捐款”而被一些不知被哪个男人使用过的想要钱的髀眼所拥有。
真是烦，成天就听着一群人扯着嗓门的喊：”只要他的那张床我还能爬得上去，只要我是他孩子的妈，我就是不会怕。”
我现在已经不需要扯着嗓门喊了，我就只要把话讲清楚“只要我自己的律师团的规模质量和那个男的是同等级别的，那我怕什么呀？我把你们两个人一起送上法庭就可以啦。”
听说了我不应该被承认是北京奥运会创意的原因是如果当时没有被FBI所录影，也就不会有我这份创意。
我的回应：如果这样也就明确一定会造成北京2008奥运会开闭幕式就永远都不会是2008年北京奥运会所向世界呈现的那份制作。
2008年北京奥运会开闭幕式之所以会被制作成2008年时中国向全世界所呈现的那样，就是因为北京2008年奥运会开闭式是采用了我的创意。我方敏是2008北京奥运会开闭幕式的创意是没有任何一个遵纪守法有良知责任的人所能够抵赖的，更不用说那些号称有才华可以领导一个国家的人。能够领导一个国家可以为人民服务的机会绝不应该意味着可以用政府的权利带头破坏法律掠夺老百姓。我是一个个体，这事是牵涉到我的一个个别案例，如果政府职权就只意味着掠夺百姓的便利权利。我方敏绝不会是人民这个定义中唯一被掠夺的一个老百姓。
-----2018年2月10日。
在中华人民共和国大学毕业的应该意味着社么？
我的回应：中华人民共和国北京中央政府2015年-2017通过广播剧用中文及广播剧所播放国家的当地语言，向全世界正式宣布并强调：
1：中华人民共和国根本就没人要操方敏的髀眼，中华人民共和国永远不会需要方敏的任何才华。
2：中国政府最高权力机构中共中央政治局有多人和李克强总理的妻子程虹是事实上的真实男女交媾两性关系，所以程虹才是真正可以领导中华人民共和国经济发展的杰出人才。
3：中华人民共和国根本就没人要操方敏的髀眼，方敏就没有可能对中华人民共和国有过任何贡献，性交功能之内或者之外，方敏都是就只能是个假冒伪造。
4：中华人民共和国李克强总理的妻子程虹为中国政府最高权力机构中共中央多人育有现已成年儿子（海外传言每人一个，共6人，据说广播剧已由各男本人（中国现任高层官员）分别宣布3-4男共妻事实），所以中华人民共和国李克强总理的妻子程虹为防止中华人民共和国断子绝孙国家灭亡的所做杰出贡献绝不可以轻视。
03-17-2018 Two different Accounts & Why my lawful private wealth’s inheriting is Chinese government's Sovereign Issue?(两个账本&我私人财产继承怎么成了中国政府的主权问题了？）
Heard this morning's an adult R's birth father's(Mr. R Sr) announcement that I was never an R's woman. (中文附后）
My response: True Statement.
----03-06-2018
Two different Accounts
My response: I got into the fight with O'Connors about who owns that American Fund. If my providing has not been taken by some O'Connors as rumored, I have no reason to get into this fight. The rumored providing paid for my living cost in 2016 was paid expense from its British parent fund's (owner's) equity account as instructed by its British parent fund. Theirs is from local American Fund's operating expense.
----February 8th, 2018
This American Fund's British Parent Fund is owned by the same French Fund that owns the British East India Company Financier.
----February 11th, 2018
This above accounts issue is also the issue between some Pejoves names in the U.S with me by rumor. In the U.S, my providing and theirs providing both deducted from local American Fund's parent British Fund's capital account. But in Britain, my providing is paid by the British Fund's parent French Fund so that my providing is deducted from the British Fund's parent French Fund's Capital Account, and theirs is deducted from the local British Fund's operating expense accounts.
Explanation: What I have inherited are trusts that my birth grandfathers set up for me before I was born.
Another way to get my providing is to let my trust wire that money directly to me which is seldom used by investors because of inconvenience caused by tedious procedures. Also, the Investor's tax for each providing check is paid to the country according to its signing local company's geographic location.
----February 27th, 2018
Heard there is a French name now that is so confusing to his girlfriend for the similar speculation.
My response: I am on that French Fund's Spanish Investor's spending account. I have nothing to do with the French young and handsome who I have not heard of yet or met in person yet.
A lot of people are speculating how long it will take the deserved to have some money group to discover a confused girlfriend of a Spanish name to miserable everybody.
----March 17th, 2018
Albert Gore has nothing to do with me for him to say anything on my any matter. And I refuse to let Albert Gore have any saying over my any matter. Please contact 911 police if he insists on you to listen to his saying about my matter which certainly would put you into legal troubles, or call his psychiatrist daughter or any psychiatrist about his severe illusion that he can have any saying over my any matter. He is probably having some sever psychiatry medical situation called Delusional disorder if he indeed just won't stop insisting on having saying over not-his-to-say my any matter, please call 911 or the psychiatrist daughter who will certainly help Albert Gore.
----February 1st, 2018
Rumored the reason I should not be acknowledged as the Creator of Beijing Olympic Opening is that if FBI did not record, then my creative ideas won't be produced.
My response: This is a true statement that obviously and definitely would results in Beijing Olympic Game opening would never be presented as it was.
The 2008 Beijing Olympic Game Opening is what it was is because that is produced by my creative ideas. The creator of 2008 Beijing Olympic Opening is Min Fang is a matter of fact that no decent lawful person can deny, not to mention those claimed talented enough to lead a Nation. The opportunity to lead a Nation to serve the people is not the same meaning of being the driving force to violate laws to rob the people. I am an individual and this is my individual case but I won't be the only individual as part of the people's definition that being robbed if government official position means the power to perform the robbery to the people.
-----February 10th, 2018
Heard this morning's talk about Chinese Premier's Sovereign talk regarding the trust my birth grandfather set up for me in Hong Kong。
My response: Even according to People's Republic of China's laws, the matter is a private wealth inheriting matter, why it becomes such a Chinese Sovereign issue? Is this imply that current administration of Chinese government is the government that "sharing one wife already that so should share everybody's wealth as well"?
I do not have any association including no sexual association with this administration of China's sharing one wife government.
I refuse my lawful private wealth to be "shared".
I make my comment about this administration of the People's Republic of China's government according to their own logic. They swear my name in order to own my lawful private wealth illegally, I shit their names in order to protect my own lawful private wealth.
I am a such famous "fake talented" because my intellectual income deserved to be owned by whoever wants some easy money, I am such a famous unwanted "female" because my providing from my own birth grandfathers' blessing deserved to be understood as "some rich man's donation" that should be owned by whoever has a used female underwear.
I am sick of the shouts "As long as I am the one still in his bed and mother his child(ren), I won't be the one who is afraid".
I have no need to shout now but to make myself clear "as long as I have the same size and same quality level of attorney service as that him, why I need to be afraid? I send you both to the laws."
----03-08-2018
听说了今天早上所播出的中国政府总理所谈参与争夺我爷爷在香港替我设立的信托是在捍卫中国主权的说法。
我的回应: 即使是按照中华人民共和国的法律，我爷爷替我在香港设立的信托也是非常明确的私人财产继承事宜，为什么就变成了这一届中国政府的主权之争？这是在说这一届的中国共产党政府是个“既然已经共了一个妻当然应该共所有人的产”的政府吗？”
我1996年离开中国是的中国共产党政府没有共妻，我也没觉着当时的政府想共我的产。 我现在已经是美国公民，我和中国习近平李克强共妻政府的任何官员都没有任何因公因私关系或者性关系。
我拒绝我自己的私人合法财产被“共产”。
我就中国政府所发表的言论完全遵循中国政府的思维逻辑。中国习近平李克强的共妻政府为掠夺我的合法私有财产对我进行谩骂羞辱的所谓演出，我为捍卫我自己合法私有财产不被公然掠夺，我也是痛骂这届中国习近平李克强的共妻政府根本就是一群只有一个妓院妓女破鞋婊子才会肯让他们下种否则就是断子绝孙的一群婊子养的杂种烂货。我也是会痛骂这届中国政府就只是一群只会满嘴舔着“髀眼价值，髀眼知识，髀眼能力，髀眼道德，髀眼荣宗”的一群没有任何正经女人愿意替他们生儿育女的下三烂猪屎而已。
我现在成了一个这么有名的“假冒伪造”就是因为有些想拿容易钱的人“就是要定了”我的智慧产权收入，我是个这么有名的“没人要的女人”就是因为我自己亲生爷爷留给我的信托所提供的生活费用就是应该被理解成“什么有钱人的捐款”而被一些不知被哪个男人使用过的想要钱的髀眼所拥有。
真是烦，成天就听着一群人扯着嗓门的喊：”只要他的那张床我还能爬得上去，只要我是他孩子的妈，我就是不会怕。”
我现在已经不需要扯着嗓门喊了，我就只要把话讲清楚“只要我自己的律师团的规模质量和那个男的是同等级别的，那我怕什么呀？我把你们两个人一起送上法庭就可以啦。”
听说了我不应该被承认是北京奥运会创意的原因是如果当时没有被FBI所录影，也就不会有我这份创意。
我的回应：如果这样也就明确一定会造成北京2008奥运会开闭幕式就永远都不会是2008年北京奥运会所向世界呈现的那份制作。
2008年北京奥运会开闭幕式之所以会被制作成2008年时中国向全世界所呈现的那样，就是因为北京2008年奥运会开闭式是采用了我的创意。我方敏是2008北京奥运会开闭幕式的创意是没有任何一个遵纪守法有良知责任的人所能够抵赖的，更不用说那些号称有才华可以领导一个国家的人。能够领导一个国家可以为人民服务的机会绝不应该意味着可以用政府的权利带头破坏法律掠夺老百姓。我是一个个体，这事是牵涉到我的一个个别案例，如果政府职权就只意味着掠夺百姓的便利权利。我方敏绝不会是人民这个定义中唯一被掠夺的一个老百姓。
-----2018年2月10日。
在中华人民共和国大学毕业的应该意味着社么？
我的回应：中华人民共和国北京中央政府2015年-2017通过广播剧用中文及广播剧所播放国家的当地语言，向全世界正式宣布并强调：
1：中华人民共和国根本就没人要操方敏的髀眼，中华人民共和国永远不会需要方敏的任何才华。
2：中国政府最高权力机构中共中央政治局有多人和李克强总理的妻子程虹是事实上的真实男女交媾两性关系，所以程虹才是真正可以领导中华人民共和国经济发展的杰出人才。
3：中华人民共和国根本就没人要操方敏的髀眼，方敏就没有可能对中华人民共和国有过任何贡献，性交功能之内或者之外，方敏都是就只能是个假冒伪造。
4：中华人民共和国李克强总理的妻子程虹为中国政府最高权力机构中共中央多人育有现已成年儿子（海外传言每人一个，共6人，据说广播剧已由各男本人（中国现任高层官员）分别宣布3-4男共妻事实），所以中华人民共和国李克强总理的妻子程虹为防止中华人民共和国断子绝孙国家灭亡的所做杰出贡献绝不可以轻视。
----2018年3月3日。
03-16-2018 What are the frustrations? （到底吵的是什么呀？）
Heard this morning's talk about my SSI
My response：My providing through Social Security system was requested and agreed-upon on July 1st of 2004 in concern of issues that often happen when a private wealthy is under-entrusting. The Social Security Administration's office that granted this approval of my providing request which is the same office that has also received my providing-payments from my trusts, is the office that supervises the Social Security Welfare office which includes the SSI office.
I do not know the criteria for approving this type of request. I know the concerns of entrusting wealth related can be helped by food stamps and housing projects to ease pressures of working for food while entrusted-wealth can afford all these expenses.
----March 16th, 2018
Heard saying "It is only the government's Justice Department says this or that is my lawful money."
My response: Not only the government's Justice Department who represents the United States laws stating this or that is my lawful money but also the money-paying companies testified that the paid-out money is for my lawful exclusive usage according to their acknowledged & known lawful money-owners' lawful instructions.
----March 16th, 2018
I am asked, "if someone deserved to be poor is the reason I refuse to give out money".
My response: My answer to the question if that person deserved to be poor depends on if I am swearing about that person or not.
But the reason I refuse to give out my own money is that I do not owe that person any money.
And I think if that person in need of help, charities and the government's welfare agency are the places that have the standard to decide if that is a person in poverty.
----March 16th, 2018
I am asked, "if someone is willing to reach out to help people in needs, why it has to be this someone's own money?"
My response: I think it may not need to be this someone's own money ---
If this someone is hired by a charity or the government's welfare agency, but this someone has to follow the standard that is defined by the charity or the government agency this someone works for because the funding is not from this someone's own money.
Or if this someone is authorized to represent the owner who lawfully owns the money on this giving-out money matter. This someone has to follow the conditions that decided by the lawful owner of the money on this giving-out money matter as well.
I am saying it is by laws that only this someone's own money can be given out as this someone's own free-wish.
----March 16, 2018
听到了所谓“只要她的丈夫是我同父同母的弟弟，她就是够资格吵闹骂砸。”
我的回应：我很清楚我的父母才是在我同父同母的弟弟饿的时候管饭，冷的时候添衣的人，从来不是我。我很清楚我自己只是一个和他一起长大的姐姐，从来就没为他的头疼脑热不能安眠。
在我得知我弟弟支持我的父母年迈后是不需要有人在乎是否冷了饿了，更不需要有人知疼问病之后，在我知道了生我养我的父母是被我弟弟的婚姻家庭因为要我父母的房子或被气的一病不起或被公然赶走，我就已经表明了我选择在乎生我养我的我自己父母的立场，我不会幻想我弟弟或者我弟弟的婚姻家庭会在乎我的死活，更不用说他们是否会在乎我的生活起居或者我的情绪跌宕。我也决不会去幻想我的生活会需要他们的小孩来过问照顾。我的生活里永远都不会需要他们。我很习惯没有他们的生活。
我不会允许我自己及我自己婚姻家人的生活被他们所吵闹骂砸，我更不会允许我自己及我自己婚姻家人的法律权益被他们所践踏。该报警该采取法律行动时，我从未犹豫过，我也永远不会犹豫。
----2018年3月16日。
听到了所谓"这是你妈妈嫡亲娘家的亲戚，你为什么不给钱?"
我的回应：就算他们和我的母亲是血缘上的同父同母，他们也从来不是我母亲的亲生兄弟姐妹。
否则，他们就不会明知他们自己从我母亲11岁起就没有和我母亲在同一个城市工作生活的情况下，居然到处宣传说我母亲是个偷人的婊子而已，就算我和我母亲的丈夫有同样的家族胎记也只能是一个婊子养的不配继承我亲生父亲家的亲生爷爷们给我的财产。
何况，自从我的母亲被我母亲的亲妈一生下来就扔出去又被我的亲外公（我母亲亲妈的丈夫）捡回来以后，我的母亲就是由我的亲外公王怀迎一个人养大的。我母亲的亲妈对我母亲是不闻不问，如果我亲外公不在家也没带着我母亲一起出门，我母亲的亲妈从来没有不准我母亲吃饭，但是我母亲必须帮忙家里干活包括照顾弟弟妹妹，我听说的就是这样。
而且，我也不清楚这些人和我母亲是否同父。他们自己才是长的不像爹不像妈更不像其他同母的兄弟姊妹。没错，我确实是在说他们自己才有可能是婊子生的，婊子养的，怪不得弄得这么一副婊子嘴脸，婊子腔调。
----2018年3月16日。
03-15-2018 Great Music or Impossibly Perfect Sound of Music
Heard of a lot of anger regarding if I know anything about music.
My response: The accurate saying should be I know what can be the impossible music called "sound of perfection"
I graduated from a medical college, a pharmacology major with 3-years Basic Medial System(BMS) education. That medical college I enrolled was established by my 3-generations grandfathers' donation may be the reason that I had this great opportunity to learn medical as I had so wished but not "the opportunities" to work in a messy and busy state-run public hospital.
But I learned human's muscle, neuron, vocal system that I know what the possible restrictions or limits of perfect human vocals might be.
I had worked as a research and development computer programmer in a company that my own inheritance may have invested that I had this great opportunity to work on great projects without performance reporting issue or project's budgeted time running-out concerns. But we did finish our project in only 4 years’ time.
I was a kernel operating system security programmer that on a login replacement project. One of the approaches I had tried was to load a logged-on user's profile as a remote object because I did not think using a cached password could make the login replacement project a good project.
In order to correctly load a network user's profile remotely, I looked into almost all aspects of how to map a user's profile to the far pointers including a logged-on user's default sound and image settings.
This work experience made me learned a lot about sound & images recording and handling technology that I have some very good concept of what would be "a perfect sound" theoretically.
Plus, I did have a high-school music teacher who was an old-colleague to my mother and taught me some basic piano-playing that I know what makes some sound a music song. And I do enjoy singing a lot and I do have some sing techniques I have developed myself. And I do have the ears I inherited from my ancient Emperor & famous composer grandfather (作曲家爷爷唐玄宗李隆基).
With all these together, I am a very picky vocal lover who knows the value if a singer can sing the impossible "song of perfection", and I am a picky music lover who knows the value of the perfect sound-mix.
This was actually what I had contributed to the conversation that had agonized so many musicians on July 1st of 2004.
----March 15th, 2018
03-14-2018 About Strategic Vision and Strategic Mission
My understanding: I think Vision and Mission should be in line with the company's Longterm development objectives and should be adjusted according to internal and external environmental changes.
My understanding: Vision and mission are formed based on information gathered from the internal and external analysis.
03-13-2018 About Managing or Governing （有关管理或者治理 ）
Heard this morning's talk about if I am the heir of my ancient Emperor grandfather.(中文附后）
My response: I am truly the heir of Tang dynasty Emperor Taizong （唐太宗李世民) by blood and family inheriting rule. I did inherit trusts that set up for me with titles and wealth.
Confusion of Charity and Providing
Two different Accounts & Who has a personal first-last named capital account everywhere?
Why my lawful private wealth’s inheriting is Chinese government's Sovereign Issue?
----March 13, 2018
Heard a lot of saying if I know anything about managing.
My response: Well, certainly I do. I learned managerial skills through my work experiences of being an employee and being an independent researcher.
In China, we have a saying that you need to know how to be beaten up before you learn how to beat in Kongfu.
This saying never means that a Kongfu beginner deserves to be beaten up but to say that learn to protect oneself and learn to defend oneself is the beginner's class for kungfu or marshall arts.
It is the same about knowledge on managing or governing.
If a shool-graduated person is never employed as an employee that has been managed, this person may never know there are so many issues in any business or non-business operation that need some managerial skills to identify, to sooth and to resolve.
If an employee has not changed any employer in this employee's work experiences, this employee may never know there are so many different styles of managerial skills or what is effectively managing that is welcomed by those being managed.
If this school-graduated but never employed person think this person self can manage without being managed experience, well, this person may never know what is effective managerial skills or even lawful managerial skills.
If an employee who does not know how to learn managerial skills from being managed experiences, the promotion of this employee who has rich being managed experience won't benefit the business as well as the employees of the business.
There are a lot of issues between me and some of the 1989 group abroad related to this. I say they do not have the work or social experiences to be the real 1989 group and they feel their proved managing talents have been ignored.
----March 13th, 2018
听说了今天早上提到的我是否是唐太宗的继承人。
我的回应：我确实是唐太宗李世民的血脉传承的继承人。我的继承是按照唐太宗李世民家里的血脉传承继承规则。我确实是继承了一些为我设立的托付了丰厚财产及古老头衔的信托。
慈善和供养的混淆
不是同一个帐本以及谁会用本名来作为投资账户的名字来到处投资啊？
我私人财产继承怎么成了中国政府的主权问题了？
----2018年3月13日。
听到了很多有关我是否知道什么是管理的说法。
我的回应：我当然知道啊。我是通过做工的经历以及做了独立研究人员的经历学到的管理。
在中国有种说法就是如果你想学武打功夫，你就先得学会如何挨打。
这种说法可不是说武打功夫的初学者就是应该被人打的鼻青脸肿的，而是说如果想学武打功夫的话，就得先学会如何保护自己以及如何进行有效的防御。
有关管理或者治理的知识也是如此。
如果一个受过学校教育的毕业生从来没有一份替人做过工的经历，这个人可能永远都不会知道在任何一个企事业单位日常营运中会有那么多的问题需要管理技能来予以识别，来予以轻重缓急，来予以处理。
如果一个替人做过工的人从来就没有换过老板的工作经历，这个做过工的人可能就永远都不会知道世上有很多很多不同的管理方式以及什么是有效的并且受到雇员欢迎的的管理方式。
如果一个受过学校教育但从来没有替人做过工的人认为可以凭着自己的理解来管理，那么这个人可能永远都不会知道什么是有效的管理方式甚至说是合乎法律的管理方式。
如果一个替人做过工的人不知道如何从被别人管理的工作经历里学习一些管理技能，那么提拔了这个有着丰富的被人管理经历的人并不能够让任何一个企事业单位以及单位里的员工受到任何益处。
我和海外的一些1989年学运人士的矛盾在很大程度上都和这有关。我说他们根本就没有任何工作或者社会经验说他们自己是真正的89年学运组织者，他们就觉得他们自己那份已经在1989年的学运中得到证实的管理组织才华及能力在海外被忽视了被轻蔑了。
----2018年3月13日。
*还有，就是有些华人因为很喜欢某一家企业或者某一个职位，经常会想一些办法来保障自己的这个职务的“安全性”。其实这种理解很不安全。因为一但有意识地想把这份职务的安全感掌握在自己手里，往往就会采取一些让管理人员“没有办法管理”的做法，而这做法一旦开始就已经将自己放在了管理人员的对立面上。管理人员的能力是通过是否有能力对员工进行管理来体现的。其实在工作中学到的知识以及经验才是职场安全的保障，只是工作地点或者说只是在那里拿工资而已。
----2018年3月13日。
03-11-2018 Confusion of Charity and Providing (慈善和供养的混淆)
Heard confusion about how I could possibly entrust my parents on July 1st of 2004.（中文附后）
My response: I entrusted caring for my parents to be provided on my behave since July 1st of 2004.
----March 11th, 2018
Heard this morning's talk about "as long as my name not in each business' capital account, I can not say I have money".
My response: This is possibly a criminal effort of blocking me to spend my own money but attempts to transfer my own lawful money for illegal usage.
This saying is equally saying that if I have used a pseudo name(a company name) to open a bank account(capital account), even with bank employees testifying that is lawfully my bank account by internal instructions as well as by supporting legal documentation, as long as my name(Min Fang) is not printed or stamped on each single paper dollar bill that has been saved in that bank account, I should not be allowed to spend any money that is saved in that bank account.
Two different Accounts & Who has a personal first-last named capital account everywhere?
----March 11th, 2018
Heard this morning's talk about deserved providing as charity.
My response: Charity means to help to survive, charity never meant to privilege free and easy luxury living.
If you listen to what has been demanded in this morning's talk, you would recognize that is not from any sort of surviving needs. I refuse any of these demands.
The People's Republic of China also has its own government-run welfare system (民政局) and Non--Government Organization provide charities.
If anyone needs charity to survive, please feel comfortable to go to any charity because that is what charity is about, you will be helped if you are qualified. My trusts have been supporting charities through local investments.
---- March 11th, 2018
If a business is my investment and this business is supporting charity, what that got to do with me?
My response: The charity expense is deducted from a Business' operating expenses.
This means
The government is supporting this business doing charity by freeing tax on this charity expenses.
Investors support this business doing charity by freeing investors' profit-share of this charity expenses.
Business management and employees support this business doing charity by earning this much money to do charity.
If a business is my investment that has supported local charities, it certainly means I have supported local charities from my profit-share that has used as the charity expenses.
----March 11th, 2018
Heard this morning's talk about these from the People's Republic of China are the ones who truly know what is the true meaning of Communism.
My response: I gathered from rumors I heard about the radio program that the Communism in the People's Republic of China means "Sharing one wife to share everyone else's wealth."
I gathered this is absolutely from the Communism concept that everybody should do the best everybody can and everybody deserves to get what everybody needs, and I gathered it is interpreted as what all this person can do is to have sexual intercourses and this person indeed works very hard on it daily if not hourly, isn't this person deserves to get what this person truly needs which is an easy luxury life that should be provided by everybody else?
I came from the People's Republic of China, I am a U.S. citizen now and I was never a Communist party member, but I have my different understanding I learned through my growing up years in the People's Republic of China about what motivated Chinese Communist party to be such an overwhelmingly popular party ever since it was established in 1921: To serve the people, to create a better life through hard working with protected fair pay ensured by the government.
I refuse to be a provider of this "communism-style" providing on whoever's sexual intercourses work-experiences.
----March 11th, 2018
听说了有关我哪有可能信托了我的父母的疑问。
我的回应：我是诚信托付了从2004年7月1日起替我照顾我的父母。
----2018年3月11日。
听说了今天早上所提到的"只要我的名字没有出现在每一家投资企业的资本账户的户主名册上，我就不能说那是我的钱"。
我的回应：这有可能是企图不准我花我自己合法钱财而把我的合法钱财转为非法用途的一项犯罪行为。
这种说法也就是等同于在说如果我用一个假名（公司名字）开了一个银行账户（投资人主家资本账户），就算是银行的工作人员证明根据内部指示我方敏是那个银行账户的合法主人，就算同时也有相关的法律文件来证明我是这个银行账户的合法主人，只要我方敏的名字没有被打印或者是像盖章一样的盖在那个银行账户所存有的每一张美元面值的美金纸币上，我方敏就不准花这个银行账号里所存有的任何一张美金纸币。
不是同一个帐本以及谁会用本名来作为投资账户的名字来到处投资啊？
----2018年3月11日。
听说了今天早上所谈的"理应得到的慈善供养"。
我的回应:慈善是提供基本生存所需的帮助，慈善从来不是高规格优越供养免费奢侈生活。
如果你听一下今天早上的诉求谈论。应该可以听出那不是什么基本生存所需的诉求。我拒绝这类诉求。
中华人民共和国也有由国家政府的民政系统以及由非政府机构提供的以慈善目的帮助。
如果有人需要慈善帮助生存所需，请直接向当地的慈善机构提出申请，没有什么不好意思的，慈善的目的就是帮助解决生存所需的一些问题, 只要符合条件，你是会得到你所需要的帮助的。我的信托一直都有通过当地的投资支持当地的慈善机构。
----2018年3月11日。
如果一个企业一直都有支持慈善，就算这个企业是我的投资，可这慈善和我有什么关系?
我的回应：慈善支出是作为公司的一个营运项目支出的。
这也就是说
政府支持这个企业在当地做慈善是通过对这一笔慈善支出不收税的方式进行的。
投资人支持这个企业在当地做慈善是通过对这一笔慈善支出所需的金额不算做营业利润来进行投资利润分成的方式进行的。
企业管理层和员工支持这个企业在当地做慈善是通过努力工作挣出这一笔慈善支出所需的钱来做慈善的方式进行的。
如果我的一个投资企业一直都有支持当地的慈善事业，当然也就是说我已经有通过我在这个投资企业的利润分成在支持当地的慈善事业了。
----2018年3月11日。
听说了今天早上所提到的从中华人民共和国来的才是真正知道什么是真正的共产主义的。
我的回应：我从我听说的一些有关广播剧的传言中已经听出来这共产主义在如今的中华人民共和国就是指“先共妻（共一个女人做老婆），再共产（共其他人的财产过富裕日子）。”
我也听出来这说法绝对是从共产主义的定义和理念”尽其所能，按需分配”而来的。我也听出来对这定义理念的解释就是：其人所能就是男女性交，其人也已经尽其所能的就算没有时时男女性交也是竭尽所能日夜都在男女性交，难道其人就不应该得到其人真正所需要的舒适奢侈不用自己挣钱花的生活吗？
我从中华人民共和国来的，我现在是美国公民，我也从来就不是共产党员。但我在中华人民共和国成长过程中所学到的中国共产党之所以从1921成立伊始就成为在中国最受欢迎的政党的原因是：中国共产党主张国家政党政权是为人民服务的，是鼓励勤劳勇敢，独立自主地创建美好幸福生活的政党政权，全体公民有权充分享受在国家政党政权保障下的平等权利及按劳分配。
我拒绝成为这么一个有着”共产主义风格“而为其他人的”性生活工作经历“而付费的供养人。
03-10-2018 A bit more About my trust my grandfather set up for me in Hong Kong (有关我爷爷替我在香港设立的信托)
Heard this morning's talk of what my father should do.
My response: Both my younger and I are in our late 40s now. My father has raised me and my younger brother with all he had.
----March 10th, 2018
Heard this morning's talk about my grandmother's “fight” with my great grandmother.
My response: I heard that was when my uncle, my father's youngest sibling, was only several years old. That "fight" was because my grandmother wanted my great grandmother took my uncle with her(my grandmother's) other children for outing. My great grandmother just completely ignored the "fact" my uncle was crying histerically non-stop.
All my grandmother's children are from my great grandmother. All my father's siblings share "the same birth mother, the same birth grandmother".
----March 10th, 2018
A bit more about my trust that my grandfather set up for me in Hong Kong.
My response: I heard it was said on the radio the total that received from my grandfather was "5 Million Chinese Silver Doller". I also heard that "10,000 Chinese Silver dollar in 1949 = ￥10 Million RBM in 2004".
If so, "500,000 Silver Dollar = ￥500 Million RMB". Compare to the total of "5Million Silver Dollar", the size of the gift "50,000 Silver Dollar" I was willing to give to my father's and my grandfather's siblings is not shabby at all.
No wonder Chinese community abroad who know the price of the Silver Dollar never commented if "￥500 Million RMB" is shabby.
----March 10th, 2018
听说了今天早上所提到的我父亲应该怎么做。
我的回应：我和我弟弟现在都已经40多岁了。我父亲当年是倾其所有养大了我和我的弟弟。
----2018年3月10日。
听说了今天早上所提到的我奶奶和我曾祖母的一场“争执”。
我的回应：我听说了那是我父亲兄弟姊妹中最小的我叔叔只有几岁大的时候。那场“争执”是因为我奶奶要我曾祖母带着我的这个叔叔和我奶奶的其他几个孩子们一起出去玩。我曾祖母当时是”完全不理”我的这个叔叔当时已经是哭的“歇斯底里”的嚎啕不止。
我奶奶的所有孩子都是由我曾祖母所出。我父亲的兄弟姊妹们都是出自同一个亲妈，同一个亲奶奶。
----2018年3月10日。
有关我爷爷替我在香港设立的信托。
我的回应：我听说广播上讲的香港一共是收到了我爷爷所托付的五百万（大洋）。我也听说了“1949年时候的1万大洋 = 2004年时候的1千万人民币”。
如果是这样的话，“50万大洋= 5亿人民币”。和我收到的一共就只有5百万大洋相比，我最初愿意给我爷爷及我父亲的兄弟姊妹的·那份“5亿元人民币一家”的礼物规模可是一点都不寒碜。
怪不得海外华裔社区那些知道“大洋”价钱的从来就没说过我方敏给的礼物拿不出手。
我爷爷家里1949年解放前后是住在上海愚园路上的连栋6个三层单户的”人民小区“， 就在上海静安寺一个武警中队招待所的对面。当时是和我爷爷的一个朋友两家分租（各三个单户）。我爷爷奶奶和我的叔叔姑姑们一个三层单户，我曾祖母和我的父亲一个三层单户，另一个是杂用。我父亲从出生就一直是和我的曾祖母一起生活的，我父亲的叔叔姑姑未婚前也都很喜欢我的父亲。这是我愿意给我父亲的叔叔姑姑一家一份礼物的原因。
***现在我要降到“一家2千万人民币”的说法是因为他们六家（我爷爷和我父亲的兄弟姊妹）可能违反了“别闹腾”的条件。
----2018年3月10日。
03-08-2018 Why my lawful private wealth’s inheriting is Chinese government's Sovereign Issue?(我私人财产继承怎么成了中国政府的主权问题了？）
Heard this morning's talk about Chinese Premier's Sovereign talk regarding the trust my birth grandfather set up for me in Hong Kong.（中文附后）
My response: Even according to People's Republic of China's laws, the matter is a private wealth inheriting matter, why it becomes such a Chinese Sovereign issue? Is this imply that current administration of Chinese government is the government that "sharing one wife already that so should share everybody's wealth as well"?
I do not have any association including no sexual association with this administration of China's sharing one wife government.
I refuse my lawful private wealth to be "shared".
I make my comment about this administration of the People's Republic of China's government according to their own logic. They swear my name in order to own my lawful private wealth illegally, I shit their names in order to protect my own lawful private wealth.
I am a such famous "fake talented" because my intellectual income deserved to be owned by whoever wants some easy money, I am such a famous unwanted "female" because my providing from my own birth grandfathers' blessing deserved to be understood as "some rich man's donation" that should be owned by whoever has a used female underwear.
I am sick of the shouts "As long as I am the one still in his bed and mother his child(ren), I won't be the one who is afraid".
I have no need to shout now but to make myself clear "as long as I have the same size and same quality level of attorney service as that him, why I need to be afraid? I send you both to the laws."
----03-08-2018
听说了今天早上所播出的中国政府总理所谈参与争夺我爷爷在香港替我设立的信托是在捍卫中国主权的说法。
我的回应: 即使是按照中华人民共和国的法律，我爷爷替我在香港设立的信托也是非常明确的私人财产继承事宜，为什么就变成了这一届中国政府的主权之争？这是在说这一届的中国共产党政府是个“既然已经共了一个妻当然应该共所有人的产”的政府吗？
我1996年离开中国是的中国共产党政府没有共妻，我也没觉着当时的政府想共我的产。 我现在已经是美国公民，我和中国习近平李克强共妻政府的任何官员都没有任何因公因私关系或者性关系。
我拒绝我自己的私人合法财产被“共产”。
我就中国政府所发表的言论完全遵循中国政府的思维逻辑。中国习近平李克强的共妻政府为掠夺我的合法私有财产对我进行谩骂羞辱的所谓演出，我为捍卫我自己合法私有财产不被公然掠夺，我也是痛骂这届中国习近平李克强的共妻政府根本就是一群只有一个妓院妓女破鞋婊子才会肯让他们下种否则就是断子绝孙的一群婊子养的杂种烂货。我也是会痛骂这届中国政府就只是一群只会满嘴舔着“髀眼价值，髀眼知识，髀眼能力，髀眼道德，髀眼荣宗”的一群没有任何正经女人愿意替他们生儿育女的下三烂猪屎而已。
我现在成了一个这么有名的“假冒伪造”就是因为有些想拿容易钱的人“就是要定了”我的智慧产权收入，我是个这么有名的“没人要的女人”就是因为我自己亲生爷爷留给我的信托所提供的生活费用就是应该被理解成“什么有钱人的捐款”而被一些不知被哪个男人使用过的想要钱的髀眼所拥有。
真是烦，成天就听着一群人扯着嗓门的喊：”只要他的那张床我还能爬得上去，只要我是他孩子的妈，我就是不会怕。”
我现在已经不需要扯着嗓门喊了，我就只要把话讲清楚“只要我自己的律师团的规模质量和那个男的是同等级别的，那我怕什么呀？我把你们两个人一起送上法庭就可以啦。”
----2018年3月8日。
03-07-2018 The trust my grandfather(my father's father) set up for me in Hong Kong -- 我爷爷（我父亲的父亲）替我在香港设立的信托
Heard this morning's talk about the trust that my grandfather (my father's father 方智仁）set up for me.
My response: I heard the trust was set up in Hong Kong before 1949, It should be set up and have been investing according to British Laws.
----March 7th, 2018
致大娘娘（大姑)家人，小娘娘(小姑)及家人，叔叔及家人：
如果你们就方智仁爷爷在香港替我设立的这个信托有疑问，请委托律师查询。但请不要先假设香港那些受方智仁爷爷委托的律师们不认为你们也是方智仁亲生子女。
我听说方智仁爷爷1965年在上海去世前也确实有把遗言遗嘱（信件）和遗产（银行存折）当面交给你们（两女一子）每一个人。
----2018年3月7日。
老爸爸方文海：如果你就方智仁爷爷在香港替我设立的这个信托有疑问，也请委托律师查询。
----2018年3月7日。
03-06-2018 Two different Accounts & Who has a personal first-last named capital account everywhere?
Heard this morning's an adult R's birth father's(Mr. R Sr) announcement that I was never an R's woman.
My response: True Statement.
----03-06-2018
Two different Accounts
My response: I got into the fight with O'Connors about who owns that American Fund. If my providing has not been taken by some O'Connors as rumored, I have no reason to get into this fight. The rumored providing paid for my living cost in 2016 was paid expense from its British parent fund's (owner's) equity account as instructed by its British parent fund. Theirs is from local American Fund's operating expense.
----February 8th, 2018
This American Fund's British Parent Fund is owned by the same French Fund that owns the British East India Company Financier.
----February 11th, 2018
This above accounts issue is also the issue between some Pejoves names in the U.S with me by rumor. In the U.S, my providing and theirs providing both deducted from local American Fund's parent British Fund's capital account. But in Britain, my providing is paid by the British Fund's parent French Fund so that my providing is deducted from the British Fund's parent French Fund's Capital Account, and theirs is deducted from the local British Fund's operating expense accounts.
Explanation: What I have inherited are trusts that my birth grandfathers set up for me before I was born.
Another way to get my providing is to let my trust wire that money directly to me which is seldom used by investors because of inconvenience caused by tedious procedures. Also, the Investor's tax for each providing check is paid to the country according to its signing local company's geographic location.
----February 27th, 2018
Albert Gore has nothing to do with me for him to say anything on my any matter. And I refuse to let Albert Gore have any saying over my any matter. Please contact 911 police if he insists on you to listen to his saying about my matter which certainly would put you into legal troubles, or call his psychiatrist daughter or any psychiatrist about his severe illusion that he can have any saying over my any matter. He is probably having some sever psychiatry medical situation called Delusional disorder if he indeed just won't stop insisting on having saying over not-his-to-say my any matter, please call 911 or the psychiatrist daughter who will certainly help Albert Gore.
----February 1st, 2018
Rumored the reason I should not be acknowledged as the Creator of Beijing Olympic Opening is that if FBI did not record, then my creative ideas won't be produced.
My response: This is a true statement that obviously and definitely would results in Beijing Olympic Game opening would never be presented as it was.
The 2008 Beijing Olympic Game Opening is what it was is because that is produced by my creative ideas. The creator of 2008 Beijing Olympic Opening is Min Fang is a matter of fact that no decent lawful person can deny, not to mention those claimed talented enough to lead a Nation. The opportunity to lead a Nation to serve the people is not the same meaning of being the driving force to violate laws to rob the people. I am an individual and this is my individual case but I won't be the only individual as part of the people's definition that being robbed if government official position means the power to perform the robbery to the people.
-----February 10th, 2018
听说了我不应该被承认是北京奥运会创意的原因是如果当时没有被FBI所录影，也就不会有我这份创意。
我的回应：如果这样也就明确一定会造成北京2008奥运会开闭幕式就永远都不会是2008年北京奥运会所向世界呈现的那份制作。
2008年北京奥运会开闭幕式之所以会被制作成2008年时中国向全世界所呈现的那样，就是因为北京2008年奥运会开闭式是采用了我的创意。我方敏是2008北京奥运会开闭幕式的创意是没有任何一个遵纪守法有良知责任的人所能够抵赖的，更不用说那些号称有才华可以领导一个国家的人。能够领导一个国家可以为人民服务的机会绝不应该意味着可以用政府的权利带头破坏法律掠夺老百姓。我是一个个体，这事是牵涉到我的一个个别案例，如果政府职权就只意味着掠夺百姓的便利权利。我方敏绝不会是人民这个定义中唯一被掠夺的一个老百姓。
-----2018年2月10日。
在中华人民共和国大学毕业的应该意味着社么？
我的回应：中华人民共和国北京中央政府2015年-2017通过广播剧用中文及广播剧所播放国家的当地语言，向全世界正式宣布并强调：
1：中华人民共和国根本就没人要操方敏的逼眼，中华人民共和国永远不会需要方敏的任何才华。
2：中国政府最高权力机构中共中央政治局有多人和李克强总理的妻子程虹是事实上的真实男女交媾两性关系，所以程虹才是真正可以领导中华人民共和国经济发展的杰出人才。
3：中华人民共和国根本就没人要操方敏的逼眼，方敏就没有可能对中华人民共和国有过任何贡献，性交功能之内或者之外，方敏都是就只能是个假冒伪造。
4：中华人民共和国李克强总理的妻子程虹为中国政府最高权力机构中共中央多人育有现已成年儿子（海外传言每人一个，共6人，据说广播剧已由各男本人（中国现任高层官员）分别宣布3-4男共妻事实），所以中华人民共和国李克强总理的妻子程虹为防止中华人民共和国断子绝孙国家灭亡的所做杰出贡献绝不可以轻视。
----2018年3月3日。
03-03-2018 These freak you out almighty powerful(吓死你的那份势力）
老爸爸方文海，你其实是被我给信托了， 我所信托的财产很安全，你也很安全，请尽快和我联系，或者联系南京紫台025-8333-2227，请赶紧和美国领事馆联系(任何地方的美领馆， 上海021-8011-2400），不用担心你是否有有效证件证明身份，他们可以做DNA鉴定来确定你和我的亲生父女关系的。如果老爸爸你因为自己的亲身经历，想在国内找找妈妈王博贤的消息，也最好是在和美国领事馆核实妈妈是否已经在美国之后，或者至少和我方敏取得联系之后，再一起商量商量如何找妈妈并和妈妈取得联系。紫金山天文台http://www.pmo.cas.cn/ztjj/lxfs/
你也可以查询一下你是否有如下医院的医疗保险：
International Hospitals and Clinics in Shanghai
Jiahui Health（嘉会医疗)
Global Healthcare International SOS
Parkway Health Shanghai United Family Healthcare American OBGYN
Delta Health Raffles Medical Group New Vision Eye Clinic
World Path Clinic Landseed Hospital Shanghai Chiropractic
Red Leaf Maternity Hospital Shanghai Sky Clinic
Shanghai East International Medical Center (SEIMC) St Michael Hospital
Institute for Western Surgery Physical Therapy & Sports Medicine (the clinic)
(源自：上海国际医院名单， 索引文章)
妈妈王博贤，听说了你有收到我的信托提供给你的健康照顾，我相信你很好，我会想办法如何可以和你取得联系。爸爸目前和我也失联。你要是能看到这个博客，就去图书馆办个图书馆卡用somebodyinma@gmail.com 和我联系。用手机上的《Email（电邮）》功能就可以。
(*我目前不是太清楚我母亲是否也有故事，她是2006年“去世”。一切就为我的一些爷爷们在我出生前就替我办的信
In 2004, it was mentioned that my father's siblings and my grandfather's siblings would have local health insurances provided that, as a joke, should be deducted from their own money of ￥500 Million that I was willing to gift later or so. They are my father side's relatives that I heard of or am familiar of.
----February 10th, 2018
You need a mother, I send you someone who is willing (since your own birth mother deserves nothing at all)
My response：Your mouthful poo must be peed by someone from Beijing of the People's Republic of China, you only deserve to poo all your shit in Beijing to those who have peed in your mouth.
----March 3rd, 2018
你嘈着要你妈，我送你一个愿意当的 (你自己亲妈可是什么都不配)。
我的回应：在你嘴里撒尿的那个烂屌应该是中华人民共和国北京的，你就只配在中国北京喷你那一嘴狗屎。
----2018年3月3日。
在中华人民共和国大学毕业的应该意味着社么？
我的回应：中华人民共和国北京中央政府2015年-2017通过广播剧用中文及广播剧所播放国家的当地语言，向全世界正式宣布并强调：
1：中华人民共和国根本就没人要操方敏的逼眼，中华人民共和国永远不会需要方敏的任何才华。
2：中国政府最高权力机构中共中央政治局有多人和李克强总理的妻子程虹是事实上的真实男女交媾两性关系，所以程虹才是真正可以领导中华人民共和国经济发展的杰出人才。
3：中华人民共和国根本就没人要操方敏的逼眼，方敏就没有可能对中华人民共和国有过任何贡献，性交功能之内或者之外，方敏都是就只能是个假冒伪造。
4：中华人民共和国李克强总理的妻子程虹为中国政府最高权力机构中共中央多人育有现已成年儿子（海外传言每人一个，共6人，据说广播剧已由各男本人（中国现任高层官员）分别宣布3-4男共妻事实），所以中华人民共和国李克强总理的妻子程虹为防止中华人民共和国断子绝孙国家灭亡的所做杰出贡献绝不可以轻视。
----2018年3月3日。
12-28-2018 Anger of "How you can claim you still own a business after you announced you would giving somebody some business?" -- 基金(会)就是一个可以让你要钱要东西实现梦想的地方啊。
These freak you out true anger (那些能够吓死你的真实的愤怒）
You already give me business, why you say that Fund is your business？
你已经说了要给我一些生意，为什么你还到处说你自己才是那个基金的老板？
You inherited that Fund? How much you can give me? Why don't I have a share? How dare you just don't give me money?
你继承那个基金啦，那你可以给我多少钱啊？我为什么没钱，你凭什么就是不给我钱？
That company is your investment, then you are its investor, but why you say you own that company?
那家公司是你投资的啊，那你也就是那个公司的投资人，可你为什么说你是那个公司的主家（东家）?
You said you would give me some investment share, then why you deny I own this much share, what do you mean I need to buy this much share?
你说你会给我一些投资份额，那你为什么不承认我已经拥有的这些份额？你凭什么要让我掏钱来买这些份额？
----February 28th, 2018
The anger is the confusion of the specific & the generic term of "Business".
My response: If you hear the angry reply of "You never give me any business, you still claiming yourself owning it" when the other one said, "Why you are so angry as if I owe you after I gave you all the business I could give you?"
You would know this anger is the confusion of the specific & the generic term of "Business".
There was something more because of this changing attorney on July 1st of 2004. Somehow, Albert Gore got this impression that I asked his father's attorney firm to be the attorney for the job that lady had quitted should mean that I was willing to give him that Fund. I heard later the attorney fee was $100 Million a year or so, how my offering of two attorney positions could possibly mean that I was giving out a Fund that is $200 Billion size in 2004? It was clarified in front of everyone that was a participant in that chat at that moment already that I was only offering an attorney position to Albert Gore's father's law firm when Albert Gore kept asking confirmation of giving. But somehow since then, Albert Gore has this determination to take over my money as if I owe him.
----published on February 27th, 2018
You said you would give me some investment share, then why you deny I own this much share, what do you mean I need to buy this much share?
你说你会给我一些投资份额，那你为什么不承认我已经拥有的这些份额？你凭什么要让我掏钱来买这些份额？
In the meeting on July 1st of 2004, there were some talks of giving out investment share which only means reserved investment share for these "privileged" to buy because all the discussion was about how to let salary-recipient can pay for these investment shares through their 401K retirement plan.
----February 28th, 2018
In Chinese community, the anger is from the confusion of the same Chinese translation of "Fund" and "Foundation", "Fund" is "基金“， "Foundation" is ”基金会“ while "会” means a gathering place in the Chinese language.
The anger in Chinese community is the misunderstanding that a "Fund" is equal to a "Foundation" which means a place to demand to fulfill all desires or all wishes or all dreams.
----February 28th, 2018
02-27-2018 Why everyone so deserves to get my money as if owe? -- 老爸爸，请去美领馆证实妈妈是或否已在美国并和我取得联系
Heard about this morning's talk about the U.S. Consulates‘ help on searching my missing father.
My response: I truly and truly appreciate and in desperate need of this help.
老爸爸方文海：你要是听到了今天早上的广播的话，请赶紧和美国领事馆联系(任何地方的美领馆），不用担心你是否有有效证件证明身份，他们可以做DNA鉴定来确定你和我的亲生父女关系的。如果老爸爸你因为自己的亲身经历，想在国内找找妈妈王博贤的消息，也最好是在和美国领事馆核实妈妈是否已经在美国之后，或者至少和我方敏取得联系之后，再一起商量商量如何找妈妈并和妈妈取得联系。
----February 27th, 2018
听说了我很喜欢的中国最著名的女作家张爱玲居然知道我给生出来了。
我详细说：我是六十年代出生的，张爱玲是1994年在纽约去世的。我昨天听说海外有很多认识张爱玲的人都从她那儿听说过“方智仁的那个孙女居然给养出来了。”
我特别相信这是真实，因为这口气就是在说一个年轻时旧识的新闻。上海滩当时很多人都知道方家等我这个大小姐真是等了很多很多年哎，我实在是太幸福了。
----2018年2月27日。
Why there is so much hostility about my inheriting?
My response: I have asked this question for a long time and I can provide a little what I have realized.
On the day I entrusted I just inherited wealth (July 1st of 2004), I got a very friendly hello from a lady attorney that triggered the huge anger that had accumulated in me since my inheriting.
I was once contacted by this lady attorney in 1999 or early 2000 that if I need sponsorship of my green card. I did not know who she is was the reason I "rejected offer" by saying the company I was working for would sponsor me.
When I heard that hello from this lady attorney, I was remembering all the tears I shed for that "office romance" and I had this grudge of "where was she when I was crying?", so I refused to hear anything but determined to change attorney who had "neglected" me. Here, I am sincerely apologizing to that lady attorney again.
I did not know she was not the attorney representing my trust or me, and she possibly did not know why I should not blame her for my tears as well were the reasons she "decided" to quit her job. It caused a lot of controversy and confusion in the Fund later that how I could possibly have replaced her.
There was something more because of this changing attorney. Somehow, Albert Gore got this impression that I asked his father's attorney firm to be the attorney for the job that lady had quitted should mean that I was willing to give him that Fund. I heard later the attorney fee was $100 Million a year or so, how my offering of two attorney positions could possibly mean that I was giving out a Fund that is $200 Billion size in 2004? It was clarified in front of everyone that was a participant in that chat at that moment already that I was only offering an attorney position to Albert Gore's father's law firm when Albert Gore kept asking confirmation of giving. But somehow since then, Albert Gore has this determination to take over my money as if I owe him.
----February 27th, 2018
02-26-2018
02-21-2018 Two different Accounts & Who has a personal first-last named capital account everywhere?
02-08-2018 Two different Accounts
My response: I got into the fight with O'Connors about who owns that American Fund. If my providing has not been taken by some O'Connors as rumored, I have no reason to get into this fight. The rumored providing paid for my living cost in 2016 was paid expense from its British parent fund's (owner's) equity account as instructed by its British parent fund. Theirs is from local American Fund's operating expense.
----February 8th, 2018
This American Fund's British Parent Fund is owned by the same French Fund that owns the British East India Company Financier.
----February 11th, 2018
This above accounts issue is also the issue between some Pejoves names in the U.S with me by rumor. My providing, by rumor, that a Miss Pejoves took is from a Ford's Holding investor Fund's British parent Fund's French grandparents Fund's Capital Account. Their agreed-upon providing is from their shared account with their British relatives as operating expenses in the British Fund which is the parent fund of this local American fund, so the American Pejoves' agreed-upon providing is booked in local American Fund's British Parent's Fund's capital account in the U.S that would be deducted as operating expense in Britain together with British Pejoves.
----February 21st, 2018
----February 27th, 2018
My name (Min Fang) is in my trust (Name: XYZ), this trust XYZ has invested a company ABC, this company ABC only has the trust XYZ as the name of its investor in its capital account (owner's account which means company ABC's owner is the trust XYZ). The company ABC further invested a company CDE, the company CDE only has the company ABC as its investor in its capital account which means CDE's owner is the company ABC, etc. My named account (Min Fang) is only in my trust XYZ, but my providing can be paid by the company CDE that later deducted from the company ABC's profiting share, and subsequently deducted from my trust XYZ's profiting share, and then deducted from my account ( Min Fang's account).
----February 27th, 2018
Albert Gore has nothing to do with me for him to say anything on any matter. And I refuse to let Albert Gore have any saying over my any matter. Please contact 911 police if he insists on you to listen to his saying about my matter which certainly would put you into legal troubles, or call his psychiatrist daughter or any psychiatrist about his severe illusion that he can have any saying over my any matter. He is probably having some sever psychiatry medical situation called Delusional disorder if he indeed just won't stop insisting on having saying over not-his-to-say my any matter, please call 911 or the psychiatrist daughter who will certainly help Albert Gore.
----February 1st, 2018
This above item certainly applicable to everyone who has so publicly/privately announced "having nothing to do with" me. I have no recommendation of a psychiatrist but 911 would be the number that you can try if you are in the situation of being the subject of those "insist-on" from those announcers who ask you to do what they are insist-on telling you to do over any of my matter.
----February 21st, 2018
Compare to most of those who insist on having a saying on the radio to shit my name, at least, I have my capital accounts in my trusts that is in this investing chain to claim myself an investor of the radio company.
If my name is not listed as the capital account's name is the reason I have no saying over this radio program producing, so is every one of those almighty prominent persons who insist on to shit me on the radio. This is precisely the reason I sent them to courts, criminal or civil.
The rumored implanting cancer is not concerning since most of the cancers can be treated or even cured completely nowadays. Rumored cancer implanting is a mechanism to simulate cancer's formation from healthy cells which means it is a very early stage in cancer formation that defects healthy cells. It is well-known that modern cancer diagnosis is the mechanism of recognizing those defected cells. The treatment mechanism, I assume, can be simple as remove those defected cells upon its discovery. This treatment mechanism is already available nowadays.
----February 14th, 2018
Rumored the reason I should not be acknowledged as the Creator of Beijing Olympic Opening is that if FBI did not record, then my creative ideas won't be produced.
My response: This is a true statement that obviously and definitely would results in Beijing Olympic Game opening would never be presented as it was.
The 2008 Beijing Olympic Game Opening is what it was is because that is produced by my creative ideas. The creator of 2008 Beijing Olympic Opening is Min Fang is a matter of fact that no decent lawful person can deny, not to mention those claimed talented enough to lead a Nation. The opportunity to lead a Nation to serve the people is not the same meaning of being the driving force to violate laws to rob the people. I am an individual and this is my individual case but I won't be the only individual as part of the people's definition that being robbed if government official position means the power to perform the robbery to the people.
-----February 10th, 2018
听说了我不应该被承认是北京奥运会创意的原因是如果当时没有被FBI所录影，也就不会有我这份创意。
我的回应：如果这样也就明确一定会造成北京2008奥运会开闭幕式就永远都不会是2008年北京奥运会所向世界呈现的那份制作。
2008年北京奥运会开闭幕式之所以会被制作成2008年时中国向全世界所呈现的那样，就是因为北京2008年奥运会开闭式是采用了我的创意。我方敏是2008北京奥运会开闭幕式的创意是没有任何一个遵纪守法有良知责任的人所能够抵赖的，更不用说那些号称有才华可以领导一个国家的人。能够领导一个国家可以为人民服务的机会绝不应该意味着可以用政府的权利带头破坏法律掠夺老百姓。我是一个个体，这事是牵涉到我的一个个别案例，如果政府职权就只意味着掠夺百姓的便利权利。我方敏绝不会是人民这个定义中唯一被掠夺的一个老百姓。
-----2018年2月10日。
02-25-2018 About Zhu's Family's Heir and My Own Fertility.
Heard this morning's talk about Ling, Jihua's son（令计划的儿子）.
My response: I heard there was a car accident as widely rumored abroad, but the victims of that car accident were all actress or actor from the entertainment industry, not from political related. This car accident has nothing to do with me.
Ling, Jihua is not the crown prince of the ancient Zhu's family from Chinese Ming dynasty. His last name was changed from Zhu when his family line is out of 5-cousin with Crown Prince.
I had some hostile conversation about this Chinese Zhu's family because I took them as a bad gang like family. I was corrected and I have no hostility at all against the crown prince of the Chinese Zhu's family.
06-13-2017 (3) 澄清有关令计划的传言
----February 25th, 2018
Heard this morning's talk about the real heir of the same Chinese Zhu's family.
My response: I heard that "that was the rumor not corrected yet" was said by Fang, Zhiqiang（方志强）, the once featured possible heir of the Zhu's family. He has the same last name with me, but no blood association.
I heard the reason China is promoting this "son's line " is that this person is willing to take over my wealth.
I heard the Zhu's Crown Prince, last named Chen, has Zhu's family wealth as his inheritable (*it is his mother's wealth currently), but the "son's line" does not have any inherited wealth. According to rumored stories I heard, the "son's line" is from the youngest child(son) when Chinese Zhu's family's inheriting rule changed to firstborn instead of the firstborn son which certainly made this "son's line" a denounced one. I heard the youngest child(son) and his mother only got coverage of living cost but not the family wealth at the time when the father passed away.
I heard a lot of rumors how the "son's line" is determined to take over my wealth. I have to declare if he relies on his ancient family to violate laws, I also have my own ancient family to protect me by laws. I heard Chinese Zhu's family has a lot of people live abroad now, they can verify all these rumors I heard of to know who is the real heir of their own ancient Chinese Zhu's family.
*I also heard rumors that they were informed of having their inherited wealth in 2006 which was not at the time when the family senior (grandparent) passed away, and their inherited wealth is not some sort of trust. And I heard they have no access to spend that informed inherited wealth. I did not hear who informed them.
----February 25th, 2018
Heard this morning's talk about Chinese "Stamped heir" participated in the same meeting on June 30th of 2004.
My response: I have no idea if he was in any of June 30th of 2004's meetings or which attorney/accountant group & wealth he was having the meeting with. My inheriting on June 30th of 2004 and my inherited wealth has nothing to do with this person's participating in any meeting on June 30th of 2004.
I was having my inheriting meeting with attorneys representing trusts that my biological grandfathers set up especially for me as the family heir birthmark-heir daughter of my biological father Fang, Wenhai(方文海) who is the family heir-birthmark heir from the family heir birthmark line. I was informed to attend my inheriting meeting by the attorneys representing those trusts that my biological grandfathers set up for me. *I was informed by my green card application attorney who was my representing attorney that was informed to have the inheriting meeting by a female case-attorney on inheriting meeting matter representing those attorneys representing trusts that my biological grandfathers set up for me.
I did hear he was informed by a Chinese Foreign Department diplomat. I do not know if he shares any grandfather with me biologically. By DNA test, he has only about 70% chance to share a grandfather. By DNA science, the DNA test result will be similar even if he shares a grandfather with me biologically which means it is not identifiable if he shares any grandfather with me biologically.
02-23-2018 Why I say "According to laws, no one is eligible to challenge my inheriting."?
----February 25th, 2018
Heard this morning's talk about my childbirth.
My response: Other than malicious cursing to express hate, it means nothing at all.
I already inherited all the trusts that set up for me and I reject any donation of all kinds of pig-borne in human format but just a true moron in any format.
*pig-born in human format but just a true moron is the term I use to address those who born from a known-birth-womb but don't know who the mother should be since that birth-womb is a creature pig's womb, must have been.
---February 25th, 2018
This morning's talk may be sparked by a conversation in glass house cancer.
My response: It was in 2008-2009 when I still lived in Somerville, MA.
I woke up from my dream during a still-on conversation. What I remembered was there were some male asking for the confirmation if the request to have Ovariectomy(卵巢切除) could be sincere, and a female's voice continuing to give the answer "yes, because of the concern for ovarian cancer."
I do not know who that female was but the voice was from my throat area. I kept quiet about it since cancer talk did sound concerning. But I was never asked legally valid if I intend to do any ovarian surgery, and there was never such a surgery ever performed in-hospital or remotely.(从未做过在医院或者远程的卵巢（切除）手术）
And I say to anyone who is so confident to harm me remotely through technology, that this threat won't worth my concern but will be that person's own price to pay permanently on that person self as well as all of that person's own next generation via the exact same remote method.
----February 25th, 2018
02-18-2018 All About Fertility Related (都是有关生小孩的）
02-06-2018 为什么说我是的钱以及我能做的一些解释
Heard "Next Kin" inheriting law is the reason for current radio program's producing effort.
My response:
I, Min Fang, refuse to let any of my lawful wealth to go to (or owned by) any next kin of mine.
I, Min Fang, refuse to let any of my lawful wealth go to (or owned by) anyone who has publicly and/or privately announced deservedness or intends to announce deservedness publicly and/or privately.
I, Min Fang, refuse to let any of my lawful wealth to go to (or owned by) anyone who has committed/participated or intend to commit/participate murder and/ or hate-crime that intended(intend) to make me a victim of.
I, Min Fang, refuse to let any of my lawful wealth to become No-Owner wealth through intentionally spread hate crime that targets me in order to make my lawful wealth a no-owner wealth.
I, Min Fang, refuse to let any of my lawful wealth to go to any charity without my clear instruction.
I, Min Fang, refuse to let any of my lawful wealth to be owned by any organization or any charity as well as any government.
I, Min Fang, refuse to let any of my privately owned lawful wealth to become any format of public wealth through any criminal effort.
I, Min Fang, refuse to consider to let any of my privately solely owned lawful wealth to be owned by any other patron(s) and/or any organization and/or any government and/or generic(specific) public in any format.
(*The pressure of writing this to save my own life was the reason I started to send letters to FBI in January of 2015).
----published on February 1st, 2018
02-23-2018 Why I say "According to laws, no one is eligible to challenge my inheriting."?
Why I say "According to laws, no one is eligible to challenge my inheriting."?(中文附后）
My explanation:
The entrusting person(my grandfather) of the trust specified the sole qualified beneficiary person of his entrusted wealth is the entrusting person's (my grandfather) biological grandaughter who has family inheriting birthmark and born from a grandson of the family inheriting birthmark line with the identical family inheriting birthmark.
This means that according to entrusting and inheriting related laws:
1: If you are not a female, you are not eligible to challenge the inheriting of the trust.
2: Further, if you have no factual evidence of the biological grandfather-granddaughter relationship with the entrusting person(my grandfather), you are not eligible to challenge the inheriting of the trust.
3: Further, if you are not the biological daughter of entrusting person's family inheriting birthmark line's grandson Fang, Wenhai(方文海), you are not eligible to challenge the inheriting of the trust.
4: Further, if you are not the biological daughter of Fang, Wenhai who has the identical family inheriting birthmark as Fang, Wenhai's, you are not eligible to challenge the inheriting of the trust.
I am my father Fang, Wenhai's one and only biological daughter,
My father Fang, Wenhai is the grandson of the entrusting person's family inheriting birthmark line with factual evidence as part of the entrusting document in entrusting records.
I have identical family inheriting birthmark as my father Fang, Wenhai's that has been verified when I was born.
Conclusion:
1: According to laws, no one is eligible to challenge my inheriting.
2: A very simple inheriting case, indeed.
----February 23rd, 2018
Heard this morning's talk about why a rich person would need to get cash from an investment.
My response:
I was once in an emergency similar situation when I was locked out of my newly moved-in apartment. I did not even have a penny or a photo ID with me, and the neighbor I asked for help doubted if I was the resident of the apartment I asked his help to open.
I heard it is a common understanding that it would be understood as impersonating with a forged ID if a rich person goes into a small investment(a coffee shop) to borrow a $20 bill in an emergency situation.
I say I would go ask where I can find a police officer because that is an emergency I am possibly in and I am in need of some help, either help of making a phone call on my behave to ask some cash to be sent over, or to help me more on my possible situation, a police officer is the most appropriate person to help me out in this kind situation.
----February 23rd, 2018
Some said if a cousin of mine can make such a phone call to me to demand cash to be sent over if in an emergency?
My response: First of all, none of my cousins share my inherited wealth. I am the sole beneficiary person of all those trusts I inherited. Those trusts I inherited were specially set up for me by my birth grandfathers before I was born. All my birth grandfathers had passed away before I was born. Mine inheriting in 2004 was not associated with any family senior's death. My inheriting was not family wealth inheriting but trusts inheriting.
Second, I do not know who this cousin can call to make such a request, and I am certainly won't answer this kind of calls from everyone of all my cousins. In China or in America, it would be the same person or same group of persons that this cousin can call to make the same or similar request.
----February 23rd, 2018
为什么我说"根据法律，没有人够资格质询我继承财产的合法性"?
我的解释：信托基金的托付人（我爷爷）指定信托基金这笔财富的唯一受益人必须是信托基金的托付人（我爷爷）的亲生孙女，这个亲生孙女必须是信托基金托付人（我爷爷)的家族继承胎记掌纹儿孙这一支生出来的，而且必须有信托基金托付人的家族继承胎记掌纹。
这个意思就是，按照信托和继承相关的法律法规：
1：如果你不是个女的，你就不够资格质询这个信托基金的继承是否合法。
2：进一步，如果你没有事实依据来证明你是这个信托基金的托付人的亲生孙女，你就不够资格质询这个信托基金的继承是否合法。（我爷爷）
3：进一步，如果你不是这个信托基金的托付人（我爷爷）的家族继承胎记掌纹儿子的这支所出且有家族继承胎记掌纹的孙子方文海的亲生女儿，你就不够资格质询这个信托基金的继承是否合法。
4：进一步，如果你不是方文海的有着和方文海一摸一样的家族胎记掌纹的亲生女儿，你就不够资格质询这个信托基金的继承是否合法。
我是我父亲方文海唯一的亲生女儿。
我父亲方文海是信托基金托付人的家族胎记掌纹这一支的有家族胎记掌纹的孙子，这事实证据是在信托文件里作为记录存档的。
我有和我父亲方文海一摸一样的家族胎记掌纹是在我出生的时候就已经证实了的。
结论：
1：根据法律，没有人够资格质询我继承财产的合法性。
2：这其实是一个非常简单而且很单纯的信托继承。
----2018年2月23日。
02-22-2018
Heard this morning's talk about why I should be the sole beneficiary person of my grandfathers' trusts.
My response: I am the person who inherited trusts that my grandfathers set up for me as a sole beneficiary person is according to each one of those entrusting grandfathers' clearly expressed will.
I am the sole owner of my own inherited wealth is according to my own will.
I can inherit all these trusts after all these years is according to laws.
I can keep all these trusts as my own wealth is according to my own wish.
According to laws, no one is eligible to challenge my inheriting.
According to laws, no one can harass me to demand to have a share of my inherited wealth.
I am not willing to be harassed regarding why I am the sole beneficiary person of those trusts I inherited.
----February 22nd, 2018
Heard this morning's talk about China.
My response: Being part of Chinese who already migrated to another country's life, I agree it is important to let 1.3 Billion people in the People's Republic of China hear our doubts, and I think it should be solely 1.3 Billion people in the People's Republic of China's privileges to make any decision regarding what eligible whom to lead the People's Republic of China and to take care of the piece of land we call our root.
----February 22nd, 2018
About the concerns and doubts if I can have the health to enjoy my inherited wealth.
The rumored dynamic infection with food consumption is not concerning. The treatment technology to remove dynamic infection's food-leaking & redirecting mechanism has been available. I have no concern of all these rumors possible impacts to my health.
----February 22nd, 2018
The rumored implanting cancer is not concerning since most of the cancers can be treated or even cured completely nowadays. Rumored cancer implanting is a mechanism to simulate cancer's formation from healthy cells which means it is a very early stage in cancer formation that defects healthy cells. It is well-known that modern cancer diagnosis is the mechanism of recognizing those defected cells. The treatment mechanism, I assume, can be simple as remove those defected cells upon its discovery. This treatment mechanism is already available nowadays.
----February 14th, 2018
*HIV new treatment technology is similar to this.
----published on Nov. 7th, 2017
听说了今天早上所提到的为什么我是我爷爷们所设立的所有信托基金的唯一受益人。
我的回应：我继承的信托基金都是我爷爷们为我设立的，我是这些信托基金唯一的受益人是根据每一个为我设立了信托的我爷爷们自己所清楚明确表达的意愿。
我是我自己所继承财产的唯一主人是根据我自己的意愿。
我可以在这么多年后还能继承这些为我设立的信托基金是根据法律。
我可以继续将这些信托作为我自己的财产保留是根据我自己的意愿。
根据法律，没有人够资格质询我继承财产的合法性。
根据法律，没有人可以骚扰我要求瓜分我所继承的财产。
我本人不愿意被任何人骚扰质询有关为什么我是这些信托基金的唯一受益人的相关问题。
----2018年2月22日。
听说了今天早上所提到的有关中国的话题。
我的回应：做为已经移居海外并且已经融入另外一个国家生活的海外华侨中的一个，我同意让那些在中华人民共和国生活的13亿中国人民知道我们这些海外华人对中国政治的质疑是非常重要的，我同时也认为只有中华人民共和国的13亿人民才有资格决定究竟应该是什么样资历的人凭什么样的资格才可以领导中华人民共和国以及管理那一片我们称之为“我们的祖国“的土地。
----2018年2月22日。
有关我是不是有可能有一份健康来享受我所继承的财富。
有关只要吃东西就会自动被感染的传言不是那么令人担心。去除造成自动感染的食物从消化道泄露及转移机制的治疗技术一直都有。我从未担心这些传言对我健康的影响。
----2018年2月·122日。
传言中的癌症移植没那么吓人，这年头，绝大多数的癌症都是可以治疗的，很多都已经可以彻底痊愈了。传言中的癌症移植就是根据癌症形成的病理机制，模拟如何从人体健康细胞来人为形成这种那种癌症的一种诱发早期癌症形成的机制。众所周知，现代医学对于癌症的诊断就是依据对于这些病变后细胞的正确识别。至于治疗吗，我估计也就是一旦发现就尽快去除这些病变后的细胞。如今这种治疗机制已经开始用于那些自然形成的癌症的治疗了。
----发布于2018年2月14日。
*HIV new treatment technology is similar to this.
----published on Nov. 7th, 2017
02-21-2018 Two different Accounts & Who has a personal first-last named capital account everywhere?
02-08-2018 Two different Accounts
My response: I got into the fight with O'Connors about who owns that American Fund. If my providing has not been taken by some O'Connors as rumored, I have no reason to get into this fight. The rumored providing paid for my living cost in 2016 was paid expense from its British parent fund's (owner's) equity account as instructed by its British parent fund. Theirs is from local American Fund's operating expense.
----February 8th, 2018
This American Fund's British Parent Fund is owned by the same French Fund that owns the British East India Company Financier.
----February 11th, 2018
This above accounts issue is also the issue between some Pejoves names in the U.S with me by rumor. My providing, by rumor, that a Miss Pejoves took is from a Ford's Holding investor Fund's British parent Fund's French grandparents Fund's Capital Account. Their agreed-upon providing is from their shared account with their British relatives as operating expenses in the British Fund which is the parent fund of this local American fund, so the American Pejoves' agreed-upon providing is booked in local American Fund's British Parent's Fund's capital account in the U.S that would be deducted as operating expense in Britain together with British Pejoves.
----February 21st, 2018
Albert Gore has nothing to do with me for him to say anything on any matter. And I refuse to let Albert Gore have any saying over my any matter. Please contact 911 police if he insists on you to listen to his saying about my matter which certainly would put you into legal troubles, or call his psychiatrist daughter or any psychiatrist about his severe illusion that he can have any saying over my any matter. He is probably having some sever psychiatry medical situation called Delusional disorder if he indeed just won't stop insisting on having saying over not-his-to-say my any matter, please call 911 or the psychiatrist daughter who will certainly help Albert Gore.
----February 1st, 2018
This above item certainly applicable to everyone who has so publicly/privately announced "having nothing to do with" me. I have no recommendation of a psychiatrist but 911 would be the number that you can try if you are in the situation of being the subject of those "insist-on" from those announcers who ask you to do what they are insist-on telling you to do over any of my matter.
----February 21st, 2018
Compare to most of those who insist on having a saying on the radio to shit my name, at least, I have my capital accounts in my trusts that is in this investing chain to claim myself an investor of the radio company.
If my name is not listed as the capital account's name is the reason I have no saying over this radio program producing, so is every one of those almighty prominent persons who insist on to shit me on the radio. This is precisely the reason I sent them to courts, criminal or civil.
The rumored implanting cancer is not concerning since most of the cancers can be treated or even cured completely nowadays. Rumored cancer implanting is a mechanism to simulate cancer's formation from healthy cells which means it is a very early stage in cancer formation that defects healthy cells. It is well-known that modern cancer diagnosis is the mechanism of recognizing those defected cells. The treatment mechanism, I assume, can be simple as remove those defected cells upon its discovery. This treatment mechanism is already available nowadays.
----February 14th, 2018
Rumored the reason I should not be acknowledged as the Creator of Beijing Olympic Opening is that if FBI did not record, then my creative ideas won't be produced.
My response: This is a true statement that obviously and definitely would results in Beijing Olympic Game opening would never be presented as it was.
The 2008 Beijing Olympic Game Opening is what it was is because that is produced by my creative ideas. The creator of 2008 Beijing Olympic Opening is Min Fang is a matter of fact that no decent lawful person can deny, not to mention those claimed talented enough to lead a Nation. The opportunity to lead a Nation to serve the people is not the same meaning of being the driving force to violate laws to rob the people. I am an individual and this is my individual case but I won't be the only individual as part of the people's definition that being robbed if government official position means the power to perform the robbery to the people.
-----February 10th, 2018
听说了我不应该被承认是北京奥运会创意的原因是如果当时没有被FBI所录影，也就不会有我这份创意。
我的回应：如果这样也就明确一定会造成北京2008奥运会开闭幕式就永远都不会是2008年北京奥运会所向世界呈现的那份制作。
2008年北京奥运会开闭幕式之所以会被制作成2008年时中国向全世界所呈现的那样，就是因为北京2008年奥运会开闭式是采用了我的创意。我方敏是2008北京奥运会开闭幕式的创意是没有任何一个遵纪守法有良知责任的人所能够抵赖的，更不用说那些号称有才华可以领导一个国家的人。能够领导一个国家可以为人民服务的机会绝不应该意味着可以用政府的权利带头破坏法律掠夺老百姓。我是一个个体，这事是牵涉到我的一个个别案例，如果政府职权就只意味着掠夺百姓的便利权利。我方敏绝不会是人民这个定义中唯一被掠夺的一个老百姓。
-----2018年2月10日。
02-20-2018 Well, Is it a charity or a deservedness to have an own blood
Heard this morning's broadcasting of "why don't you get that HE is the person really supports the wife".
My response: Why don't you get the fact I am much wealthier than him. Please notice the capital "I" and the lowercase "him" according to the English grammar.
I am the wealthiest heiress ever. I do have my own great and great which is a lot of "great" prefix that is so well-deserved birth grandfathers.
----February 20th, 2018
Well, Is it a charity or a deservedness to have an own blood?
My response: I do not have any child (children) with anyone featured in this morning's radio broadcasting is a true statement.
I do have the obligation to express myself that I have nothing to do with that those him with the same level of "paying attention to the necessity of expressing publicly the fact of really having nothing to do" for my future young and handsome who possibly already paying attention to the medical treatment progress of my appearance. So, let me have a start as:
Be alert: according to the rumor, this morning's featured wives are all truly well-known to the husbands' society because they were all once very expensive and famous prostitutes in Las Vegas who get paid to open legs to all riches that can afford to pay their expensive prices.
This rumor may actually be convincing to everyone who ever doubted why they are only acknowledged as "a longtime girlfriend" for years till this recent public proud announcements as if there are some secrets need to hide, as well as all those "the price proves the goodness" logic &"mother-fxxxer" titles. This rumor may just be the secret and reason of the proud of shared or even inherited Connoisseur level of knowledge and capability.
As long as this wife is what he truly deserved, I love to spread this rumor to tell everyone who he truly deserves.
Well, the answer to the question "Is it a charity or a deservedness to have an own blood" depends on who he really is for both scenario, so, I let the reader of this blog decide what it is based on their own knowledge of who he truly is. I just don't understand why Tina O'Connor can be so willing to sacrifice herself to be a Pathetic Psycho on this blog.
02-14-2018 This morning's Proud of "Well Deserved Giving-only Promised Share Forever Romance"
----February 20th, 2018
02-19-2018 Two different Accounts & A Chinese Jennie from Ford Foundation believed Ford name is a beggar's name
Heard this morning's broadcasting of Beggar Ford.
My response: Heard that is a Chinese Jeannie from Ford Foundation's joke about who the Ford name truly is.
-----February 19th, 2018
02-08-2018 Two different Accounts
My response: I got into the fight with O'Connors about who owns that American Fund. If my providing has not been taken by some O'Connors as rumored, I have no reason to get into this fight. The rumored providing paid for my living cost in 2016 was paid expense from its British parent fund's (owner's) equity account as instructed by its British parent fund. Theirs is from local American Fund's operating expense.
----February 8th, 2018
This American Fund's British Parent Fund is owned by the same French Fund that owns the British East India Company Financier.
----February 11th, 2018
Albert Gore has nothing to do with me for him to say anything on any matter. And I refuse to let Albert Gore have any saying over my any matter. Please contact 911 police if he insists on you to listen to his saying about my matter which certainly would put you into legal troubles, or call his psychiatrist daughter or any psychiatrist about his severe illusion that he can have any saying over my any matter. He is probably having some sever psychiatry medical situation called Delusional disorder if he indeed just won't stop insisting on having saying over not-his-to-say my any matter, please call 911 or the psychiatrist daughter who will certainly help Albert Gore.
----February 1st, 2018
Compare to most of those who insist on having a saying on the radio to shit my name, at least, I have my capital accounts in my trusts that is in this investing chain to claim myself an investor of the radio company.
If my name is not listed as the capital account's name is the reason I have no saying over this radio program producing, so is every one of those almighty prominent persons who insist on to shit me on the radio. This is precisely the reason I sent them to courts, criminal or civil.
The rumored implanting cancer is not concerning since most of the cancers can be treated or even cured completely nowadays. Rumored cancer implanting is a mechanism to simulate cancer's formation from healthy cells which means it is a very early stage in cancer formation that defects healthy cells. It is well-known that modern cancer diagnosis is the mechanism of recognizing those defected cells. The treatment mechanism, I assume, can be simple as remove those defected cells upon its discovery. This treatment mechanism is already available nowadays.
----February 14th, 2018
Rumored the reason I should not be acknowledged as the Creator of Beijing Olympic Opening is that if FBI did not record, then my creative ideas won't be produced.
My response: This is a true statement that obviously and definitely would results in Beijing Olympic Game Opening Ceremony would never be presented as it was.
The 2008 Beijing Olympic Game Opening Ceremony is what it was is because that is produced from my creative ideas. The creator of 2008 Beijing Olympic Opening Ceremony is Min Fang is a matter of fact that no decent lawful person can deny, not to mention those claimed talented enough to lead a Nation. The opportunity to lead a Nation to serve the people is not the same meaning of being the driving force to violate laws to rob the people. I am an individual and this is my individual case but I won't be the only individual as part of the people's definition that being robbed if government official position means the power to perform the robbery to the people.
听说了我不应该被承认是北京奥运会创意的原因是如果当时没有被FBI所录影，也就不会有我这份创意。
我的回应：如果这样也就明确一定会造成北京2008奥运会开闭幕式就永远都不会是2008年北京奥运会所向世界呈现的那份制作。
2008年北京奥运会开闭幕式之所以会被制作成2008年时中国向全世界所呈现的那样，就是因为北京2008年奥运会开闭式是采用了我的创意。我方敏是2008北京奥运会开闭幕式的创意是没有任何一个遵纪守法有良知责任的人所能够抵赖的，更不用说那些号称有才华可以领导一个国家的人。能够领导一个国家可以为人民服务的机会绝不应该意味着可以用政府的权利带头破坏法律掠夺老百姓。我是一个个体，这事是牵涉到我的一个个别案例，如果政府职权就只意味着掠夺百姓的便利权利。我方敏绝不会是人民这个定义中唯一被掠夺的一个老百姓。
-----2018年2月10日。
02-18-2018 All About Fertility Related (都是有关生小孩的）
Heard this morning's talk about "why do you need to have your own biological child".（中文附后）
Heard the reason that my reward from Viagra(Blue) was taken is "Fertility Goddess worship" rumors.
My response: I refuse to let my contribution to Viagra (Blue) to be taken by anyone for any reason.
I heard of this Fertility Goddess rumor today and I have to say I do not know if this is part of so many build-up a case efforts to take my intellectual income because the argument of the true deservedness of taking my share of viagra (blue) invention reward is that it should be deserved by a viagra(blue) beneficiary person who can use viagra to perform sexual intercourse.
I do my clarification here: I contributed to help females' infertile issues with pregnancy-mother is a true statement. It was inspired by my own efforts to help myself to have my own biological children through pregnancy mothers. This inspiration was promoted by so many people who truly wish infertile women can be mothers of their own biological children. And this inspiration was based on already existing matured medical technology of tube baby - IVF(In vitro fertilization).
*I heard oral intake Viagra(Blue) can result having at least several valid sperms in each outburst which can be used to produce healthy children through the same IVF technology. I contributed to Viagra(Blue) is a true statement too.
----February 18th, 2018
听说了今天早上所提到的“你还需要你自己亲生的小孩干嘛？”
我的回应：听说那是我父亲的弟弟妹妹的一个小孩讲的，估计自认是可以够资格凭近亲法律继承的。我已经拒绝让我的财产被按照所谓的近亲法律继承了。
我重复我早上说的，谁愿意这么说，我就愿意对这人那人这么回应：“我可以看着你自己的亲生孩子被火活活烧死，我可以连眼睛都不眨一下。就因为我也已经有了我自己的亲生小孩，就因为我也认为你是不需要有你自己亲生小孩子的。和你也就是彼此彼此啦。”
----2018年2月18日。
听说了今天早上的广播所传达的“那些年纪老了的都已经公开宣布不要你了，你还跟谁生孩子啊？”
我的回应：可选的人多啦。我可以从那些愿意和我共度快乐奢侈人生的年轻英俊又多汁多液的成堆小伙子当中选啊。我可是继承了我爷爷们给我的非常非常丰厚的祝福啊，我还有一个奶奶专门给了我一份多子多福的祝愿。我很快乐而且我也不介意让一个年轻英俊的好小伙和我共度美好快乐的奢侈人生，就算那是一个年轻了一大截的，只要他优秀，我也是不会在意的。
我真是很能想象我的年轻英俊和我们论堆算的孩子们一起，站在我们自家阳台上共同检阅那些穿着我自己所设计的制服一起迈着那整齐的步伐的保安们。我还真是有一堆我那些帝王将相的爷爷们所给的高贵王室帝王头衔，像Ingonyama（狮子王）这种，我继承爷爷奶奶们的祝福就是连信托的财产和这些头衔就一起都继承了。
我是个女孩，但我可是有着2000年历史的一夫多妻家庭的继承人。我可不是那么容易就被这种下三烂的狗屎说法轻易的给吓到从此苟且偷生的。
----2018年2月18日。
听说我从伟哥蓝片拿到的智慧产权奖励被拿走是因为一个"凭什么把我当送子观音"的说法。
我的回应：我拒绝我对伟哥蓝片的贡献被任何人以任何借口而领走。
我是今天才听说送子观音的说法，我还必须得说我不知道这种说法是不是属于那一堆以制造案子来掠夺我的智慧产权收入的违法活动的一部分。听说伟哥蓝片的智慧产权收入中属于我的那一部分奖励被拿走的理由就是这份奖励就是应该属于那些吃了伟哥蓝片可以进行男女性交的受益者。
我做我能做的解释：我对“不孕女性可以通过代理孕母以实现拥有自己·亲生孩子的愿望”有贡献是事实。这份想法是源自我希望我自己可以通过代理孕母有我自己的小孩。这份想法被很多真心希望不孕妇女可以拥有自己亲生骨肉的人士所大力推广，这份想法是基于当时已经存在也已经很成熟的现代医学的试管婴儿技术--人工体外受精胚胎移植受孕技术。
----2018年2月18日。
02-15-2018 Two different Accounts & Who has a personal named capital account everywhere?
02-08-2018 Two different Accounts
My response: I got into the fight with O'Connors about who owns that American Fund. If my providing has not been taken by some O'Connors as rumored, I have no reason to get into this fight. The rumored providing paid for my living cost in 2016 was paid expense from its British parent fund's (owner's) equity account as instructed by its British parent fund. Theirs is from local American Fund's operating expense.
----February 8th, 2018
This American Fund's British Parent Fund is owned by the same French Fund that owns the British East India Company Financier.
----February 11th, 2018
Albert Gore has nothing to do with me for him to say anything on any matter. And I refuse to let Albert Gore have any saying over my any matter. Please contact 911 police if he insists on you to listen to his saying about my matter which certainly would put you into legal troubles, or call his psychiatrist daughter or any psychiatrist about his severe illusion that he can have any saying over my any matter. He is probably having some sever psychiatry medical situation called Delusional disorder if he indeed just won't stop insisting on having saying over not-his-to-say my any matter, please call 911 or the psychiatrist daughter who will certainly help Albert Gore.
----February 1st, 2018
Compare to most of those who insist on having a saying on the radio to shit my name, at least, I have my capital accounts in my trusts that is in this investing chain to claim myself an investor of the radio company.
If my name is not listed as the capital account's name is the reason I have no saying over this radio program producing, so is every one of those almighty prominent persons who insist on to shit me on the radio. This is precisely the reason I sent them to courts, criminal or civil.
The rumored implanting cancer is not concerning since most of the cancers can be treated or even cured completely nowadays. Rumored cancer implanting is a mechanism to simulate cancer's formation from healthy cells which means it is a very early stage in cancer formation that defects healthy cells. It is well-known that modern cancer diagnosis is the mechanism of recognizing those defected cells. The treatment mechanism, I assume, can be simple as remove those defected cells upon its discovery. This treatment mechanism is already available nowadays.
----February 14th, 2018
听说了我不应该被承认是北京奥运会创意的原因是如果当时没有被FBI所录影，也就不会有我这份创意。
我的回应：如果这样也就明确一定会造成北京2008奥运会开闭幕式就永远都不会是2008年北京奥运会所向世界呈现的那份制作。
2008年北京奥运会开闭幕式之所以会被制作成2008年时中国向全世界所呈现的那样，就是因为北京2008年奥运会开闭式是采用了我的创意。我方敏是2008北京奥运会开闭幕式的创意是没有任何一个遵纪守法有良知责任的人所能够抵赖的，更不用说那些号称有才华可以领导一个国家的人。能够领导一个国家可以为人民服务的机会绝不应该意味着可以用政府的权利带头破坏法律掠夺老百姓。我是一个个体，这事是牵涉到我的一个个别案例，如果政府职权就只意味着掠夺百姓的便利权利。我方敏绝不会是人民这个定义中唯一被掠夺的一个老百姓。
-----2018年2月10日。
02-14-2018 This morning's Proud of "Well Deserved Giving-only Promised Share Forever Romance"
Heard this morning's announcement of a Jessica's one female's polygamist family.
My response: The four announced proud sharing males have nothing to do with me is a true statement. Let whoever read this blog to decide if I am writing out of jealous.
I heard this morning's proud announcement of 4 brothers sharing a one-and-only child each from one Jessica. This Jessica, I accused, is the hater you heard on the radio that fully supported by this males group to throw all those shits towards me.
I heard the announced four males are not really brothers but cousins by blood. Their willingness to be a group to center the Jessica to have this polygamist family is indeed very impressive.
Compared to the four prominent named males, this Jessica is in her late forties who has no advantage in age, no advantage in appearance, no advantage in education, talents or achievement, no advantage in family wealth, no advantage in the family name's prominence and resources.
Very impressively is the rumor that romance is promised forever as long as this Jessica is available to anyone of the four's desire.
Very impressively is the enormous supports publicly presented by the families as well as relatives of those males.
Very impressive is the full-heart willingness that proudly emphasized publicly & privately through all these spoil this Jessica rotten expression.
So, I say
It is not some disgustingness because it is obvious that the wealthy family name's proud is that brothers sharing one woman is not out of poverty,
It is not some sacrificing because it is obvious that none of these four prominent males have done this without their own full heart willingness.
It is not some unfitness because it is obvious that there is nothing to match the males with the female Jessica at all when matchmaking concept needed to be mentioned.
Thus, I conclude
It must be the Gift of Deservedness from whatever creature these four males take as their almighty.
It must be the Fair Evaluation of who those males truly are to have this female Jessica to be what they truly deserve.
It must be the Pure Simplicity of what Jessica vs David is in British-American adult slang.
Being the victim of this polygamist family's public expression of negativeness, I confess
I am truly happy I am truly not what they deserved in romance,
I am truly not willing to be a giving-only in my romance,
I truly not deserve to be such a David to have this Jessica-Davids style of fair evaluation.
I can't afford not to mention that none of these Davids, Jessicas or equivalent has a capital account that is big enough to self-claim a significant investor or an investor at all in the radio company or any of R's investment.
Compare to most of them, at least, I have my capital accounts in my trusts that is in this investing chain to claim myself an investor of the radio company.
If my name is not listed as the capital account's name is the reason I have no saying over this radio program producing, so is everyone of those almighty prominent persons who insist on to shit me on the radio. This is precisely the reason I sent them to courts, criminal or civil..
----February 14th, 2018
02-11-2018 Two different Accounts
02-08-2018 Two different Accounts
My response: I got into the fight with O'Connors about who owns that American Fund. If my providing has not been taken by some O'Connors as rumored, I have no reason to get into this fight. The rumored providing paid for my living cost in 2016 was paid expense from its British parent fund's (owner's) equity account as instructed by its British parent fund. Theirs is from local American Fund's operating expense.
----February 8th, 2018
This American Fund's British Parent Fund is owned by the same French Fund that owns the British East India Company Financier.
----February 11th, 2018
Albert Gore has nothing to do with me for him to say anything on any matter. And I refuse to let Albert Gore have any saying over my any matter. Please contact 911 police if he insists on you to listen to his saying about my matter which certainly would put you into legal troubles, or call his psychiatrist daughter or any psychiatrist about his severe illusion that he can have any saying over my any matter. He is probably having some sever psychiatry medical situation called Delusional disorder if he indeed just won't stop insisting on having saying over not-his-to-say my any matter, please call 911 or the psychiatrist daughter who will certainly help Albert Gore.
----February 1st, 2018
听说了我不应该被承认是北京奥运会创意的原因是如果当时没有被FBJI所录影，也就不会有我这份创意。
我的回应：如果这样也就明确一定会造成北京2008奥运会开闭幕式就永远都不会是2008年北京奥运会所向世界呈现的那份制作。
2008年北京奥运会开闭幕式之所以会被制作成2008年时中国向全世界所呈现的那样，就是因为北京2008年奥运会开闭式是采用了我的创意。我方敏是2008北京奥运会开闭幕式的创意是没有任何一个遵纪守法有良知责任的人所能够抵赖的，更不用说那些号称有才华可以领导一个国家的人。能够领导一个国家可以为人民服务的机会绝不应该意味着可以用政府的权利带头破坏法律掠夺老百姓。我是一个个体，这事是牵涉到我的一个个别案例，如果政府职权就只意味着掠夺百姓的便利权利。我方敏绝不会是人民这个定义中唯一被掠夺的一个老百姓。
-----2018年2月10日。
02-10-2018
Heard this morning's mention of two Fang's names health.
My response: In 2004, it was mentioned that my father's siblings and my grandfather's siblings would have local health insurances provided that, as a joke, should be deducted from their own money of ￥500 Million that I was willing to gift later or so. They are my father side's relatives that I heard of or am familiar of.
I would feel bad if there was no such discussion in 2004 when I made the arrangement of my own parents' healthcare. The healthcare I received is the reason I have this confidence about if my parents still alive.
----February 10th, 2018
Heard some confusion of other health care.
My response: My mother's eldest sister, 王博真， who was very nice to me when I was little, had received best available local health care provided for her in her last days. It was from her, when I was 12-14 years old, that she had her own child adopted and I was only her sister's child. I felt comfortable that she had received the health care she needed in her last days, and I am comfortable that I was not the person she needed for accompanying in her last days.
----February 10th, 2018
Rumored the reason I should not be acknowledged as the Creator of Beijing Olympic Opening is that if FBI did not record, then my creative ideas won't be produced.
My response: This is a true statement that obviously and definitely would results in Beijing Olympic Game opening would never be presented as it was.
The 2008 Beijing Olympic Game Open is what it was is because that is produced from my creative ideas. The creator of 2008 Beijing Olympic Opening is Min Fang is a matter of fact that no decent lawful person can deny, not to mention those claimed talented enough to lead a Nation. The opportunity to lead a Nation to serve the people is not the same meaning of being the driving force to violate laws to rob the people. I am an individual and this is my individual case but I won't be the only individual as part of the people's definition that being robbed if government official position means the power to perform the robbery to the people.
-----February 10th, 2018
听说了我不应该被承认是北京奥运会创意的原因是如果当时没有被FBJI所录影，也就不会有我这份创意。
我的回应：如果这样也就明确一定会造成北京2008奥运会开闭幕式就永远都不会是2008年北京奥运会所向世界呈现的那份制作。
2008年北京奥运会开闭幕式之所以会被制作成2008年时中国向全世界所呈现的那样，就是因为北京2008年奥运会开闭式是采用了我的创意。我方敏是2008北京奥运会开闭幕式的创意是没有任何一个遵纪守法有良知责任的人所能够抵赖的，更不用说那些号称有才华可以领导一个国家的人。能够领导一个国家可以为人民服务的机会绝不应该意味着可以用政府的权利带头破坏法律掠夺老百姓。我是一个个体，这事是牵涉到我的一个个别案例，如果政府职权就只意味着掠夺百姓的便利权利。我方敏绝不会是人民这个定义中唯一被掠夺的一个老百姓。
-----2018年2月10日。
02-08-2018 Two different Accounts
Heard this morning's talk about two different accounts.
My response: I got into the fight with O'Connors about who owns that American Fund. If my providing has not been taken by some O'Connors as rumored, I have no reason to get into this fight. The rumored providing paid for my living cost in 2016 was paid expense from its British parent fund's (owner's) equity account as instructed by its British parent fund. Theirs is from local American Fund's operating expense.
----February 8th, 2018
02-06-2018 为什么说我是的钱以及我能做的一些解释。
我的继承是怎么回事：
我继承财产的故事其实很简单，就是因为我是家里2500年来第一个有着和爷爷们一样的家里的继承掌纹胎记的女孩子，我爷爷们用为我设立信托的方式给了我一些礼物以示庆贺总算有了我（女孩）加盟之意。这钱那钱是我的就是因为是由我爷爷们替我设立的信托投资的。
我所继承的信托里就没有方承捷的名字，我和他都还没有生出来啊。我在我爷爷的遗嘱里是个代号“女掌（有掌纹胎记的女儿）”。我能抢他什么钱？
我的祖爷爷（我爷爷A），也就是设立这个信托的那个人在他的信里（遗嘱里）界定了一个由他自己的哪个儿子（我爷爷B）所出的家族继承胎记一支的一个有着家族继承胎记的女儿是这个信托的唯一受益人。遗嘱信中所界定的那个儿子（我爷爷B）是一个有家族继承胎记的儿子。
我爷爷B，也就是我爷爷A在他自己所立遗嘱里所界定的继承人儿子，没有生出一个有继承胎记的女儿而是生了一个有继承胎记的儿子（我爷爷C）。所以，我爷爷B就通知了那些照看着这个信托的人，这个信托的继承胎记女受益人将是由他这个有继承胎记的儿子（我爷爷C）这支所出的。
就这样一代又一代，直到我爷爷方智仁这一代。我的父亲方文海是我爷爷方智仁所出的有继承胎记的儿子。所以我爷爷方智仁就通知了那些照看着这个信托的人，这个信托的继承胎记女受益人将是由他这个有继承胎记的儿子方文海这支所出的。
我是1967年出生，我的家族胎记掌纹和我父亲方文海的胎记掌纹几乎是一摸一样的。
这是为什么我说我是按照我祖爷爷（我爷爷A）的遗嘱继承了我祖爷爷（我爷爷A）所设立的这个信托。那个基金是由我所继承的这个信托所设立的，所以我说那是我的基金。
有关我继承财产的一些矛盾愤怒及我的解释：
"你要是有钱，为什么就不能给他或她一点。”
我回答：我有钱，只因为有个他或她想要也需要，你就替他或她跟我要钱，也就是你在替他或她讨饭就是了，否则谁不需要钱哪。街边上讨饭的哪一个不是因为觉得过路人有钱，而讨饭的确实需要才讨的呀？可你讨得也太狠了点，不是一分两分，是豪宅名车貂皮大衣，还要永远如此。我方敏就是拒绝给钱。
你要真是需要帮助，去慈善机关就得。只要你属于慈善帮助的对象，符合条件，他们会帮助你，不会给你脸色看的。我所继承的财产都有支持慈善。需要说明的是，虽然是我方敏的投资在捐款，但这些钱都是当地人挣得，所以“同样来自中国大陆”不会是优先得到慈善帮助的任何原因。
“你要是继承了财产，为什么就不能对中国做点贡献”
我回答：你指的是对中华人民共和国960万平方公里和十三亿人民做贡献吗？文化上，2008年北京奥运会残奥会开闭幕式；经济上，蔬菜大棚，城市公交地铁，等等，这可都是2004年我继承财产以后对中国的贡献。你想要的究竟是什么具体的贡献？
“你要是有钱，为什么就不能给你弟弟老婆一点钱”。
我回答：我的母亲作为我父亲的老婆被我父亲养着，吃住我父亲的，就是因为她自己没有收入就被我弟弟的老婆找了一堆的朋友来教训教训要我母亲识相点，别忘了她自己就只是个没有收入的人。我作为我母亲的女儿，我就是不乐意给这个所谓弟弟的老婆一分一厘我的钱。我就是不乐意给这个所谓的弟弟的老婆所生的任何杂种非杂种一分一厘我的钱，更不用说大把钱。我方敏就是拒绝给任何钱。
“我就是不明白，那些有钱男人已经是一次次的宣布和你一点关系都没有，你为什么还说你很有钱？”
我回答: 因为我的钱不是那些有钱男人给的，而是我自己亲生的爷爷们给的。我的钱和他们家里财产有一些投资伙伴的关系，就这关系。
他们一次次的宣布和我没关系，有些是出于他们自己的生活状态以及和我的矛盾，有些是不堪被这些来自中国的愤怒言语及被要求协助非法分我所继承的财产所骚扰。
“我就是不明白，为什么你有钱，我怎么没有？”
我回答：你很清楚你和我一点血缘关系都没有，而我的钱是我自己亲生爷爷给我的，你还问为什么你没有？
你是在强调中国是个大妓院,而你是中国大妓院成员之一吗？也就是你虽然和我没有性关系，你也可以凭你的裤裆应该有钱吗？你也是因为弄不清性交，夫妻性关系与父母子女之间因父母性交而产生的血脉传承关系的区别吗？还能有什么原因你就是不明白，我的钱和你一点关系都没有，你还就是必须要让我把话跟你说清楚还必须让你弄明白为止，还特别够资格就是愤怒？
你得先问问谁愿意做你的嫖客再问凭什么。我方敏拒绝做你的嫖客，我方敏拒绝让你幻象你可以凭你的裤裆来要我的钱。
“我就是不明白，你有钱，为什么你的亲戚却是一点都没有？”
我回答：我继承的是信托，是我的爷爷们因为我是个女继承人另外给的。我的亲戚们都已经在他们的父辈去世分家产时拿到了他们自己的那一份，这包括我父亲的兄弟姊妹也都在他们的父亲1965年去世时拿到了他们父亲给的财产。中华人民共和国的信托法和继承法可以帮助你了解很多什么是信托继承或者继承信托。
我的父亲目前是失踪，我到目前为止都没有听说我父亲继承了什么财产，而我父亲的毕生积蓄和唯一的一套房子估计已经被他唯一的儿子（我弟弟）转移到了我弟弟的名下。
我所继承的信托不是我父亲给的，是我的爷爷们，也就是我父亲的父亲及爷爷们给的。
“我就是不明白，你有钱，为什么你要吃救济？”
我回答：我不是在吃救济。因为信托财产之后经常会出现一些这样那样的意外状况，而且因为法律为保障信托人的利益而设置的一系列规范，财产信托后再更改信托财产时所决定的生活供给很难，所以在我2004年继承信托后，因为健康原因又再办理所继承财产的诚信托付时，有人建议我的生活供给通过美国政府的福利系统给付以保障我的生活不至于因为一些意外状况而真的流落街头没饭吃。我现在的生活低水平就是因为一些这样那样的状况，这些状况目前已经在法律处理当中了。
有没有可能有其他方家血脉的钱在我的信托里？
回答：真的没有。目前我在我博客上宣布的已经向我支付健康保健给付的，也就是被闹得很凶的那几个基金，都是已在美国几百年了，也就是几百年以前就已经被信托的钱了。从当年办理信托到现在已经好几百年，也换了很多律师，都没有联络他们就是因为没有他们的钱。。
有人说万一那？
我回答：没有万一。要么就是有钱但不想给才没给，要么就是没有钱。没有任何万一的。一切是按照信托法和继承法所规范的。
我有收到钱就已经说明我的律师是诚信很好的，按我爷爷的托付把钱给我了。这就已经说明我的律师没有他们的钱。
如果有方家亲戚问他们爷爷奶奶的钱在哪里。
我的回应：他们的爷爷奶奶从来就没告诉过我。
解释：我不认识他们的爷爷奶奶，我的爷爷奶奶是在1965年及之前就去世了。我是1967年才出生的，从未见过他们的爷爷奶奶或是我的爷爷奶奶。我父亲是连他自己亲爹的钱藏哪儿了都没有听说过。我哪里会知道他们的爷爷奶奶把钱给藏在哪儿啦?
至于我的信托律师会不会知道他们爷爷奶奶的潜藏在哪儿啦，我得说清楚现在应该所有人都知道我的信托律师诚信很好，要是他们这些律师知道他们爷爷奶奶的藏钱处，那一定是会通知他们继承的。
至于我要是听说什么消息，我可以通知警方，因为“不知道他们人在哪才没给钱”这种情况是不大可能的。在国外，都是受委托律师承担通知受益人继承财产的责任。
为什么说那家基金从来不是欧家的（O'Connor)。
这家美国基金公司从来不是OConnor家的钱。这个美国基金和英国东印度公司投资人基金是由同一个上级的·法国基金公司所投资的。整个英国法国都知道，听说就因为东印度公司的投资人基金（也是这家基金的投资人）是英国王室曾经最想要的基金。但这个基金是有个法国上级公司，虽然法国英国是谁也不怕谁，但这家法国公司还有个斯堪的纳维亚半岛的上级投资公司，所以整个英国和法国都知道这个基金是个亚洲人所设的信托投资的，从来就不是欧家的（从来不是O'Connor家的）。闹了有一两百年，英国王室没弄到手也就算了。现在他们也不要了。都听到英国王室宣布不会和我有任何关系没有任何小孩也不会有任何小孩，就是宣布不会再要这个基金。（基金只有被我所孕育的英国王储所拥有才可以被英国王室合法拥有）。
我是英国东印度公司的投资人就是因为英国的东印度公司是由我的信托投资的。英国东印度公司有很多投资人，这家投资基金时期最早的投资人，也是最有名的。我的主家资本账户是在我所继承的信托里，不在这家英国基金里， 这家企业账本上只有其上级法国基金投资公司作为主家有主家资本账户。况且公司也不见得人人都确定知道我是公司的投资人，所以尽管这家美国企业是我的信托所投资的，一般情况下我也不会直接跑去公司拿钱。
就象有个银行家开了10家饭店，这个银行家要是需要什么东西，最恰当的就是联络和他有直接工作关系的替他照看餐馆的经理，因为那些餐馆员工不见得人人都认识这个银行家。我也是一样。我是在我自己的手机录音机上就可以有效留言给我的信托律师，我父亲应该也可以。但我父亲最好是和我联络以免感觉被忽视了。
我要劝我父亲耐心点，我们的情况已经在好转。众所周知，如果我的情况好，我父亲就不可能是现在这份处境，而我们是现在这份处境，就已经说明我的律师们是很忙很忙了。我知道的是，至少是美国的执法机关在我寻求他们的帮助开始就是忙的不得了。
我是有适当的授权而由这家美国基金支付费用医药及生活，这家美国基金是把这份替我支付的费用从其上级法国基金投资公司的主家资本账户里的应缴盈利部分扣除，而这法国基金投资公司再把这笔钱从其斯堪的纳维亚上级投资公司的主家资本账户里的应缴盈利部分里扣除，持续如此，最终就是由我自己的信托里的我的主家资本账户里的应收账款里扣除。所以，如果这家美国基金在其法国投资公司的授权下，由美国投资基金公司的法国基金主家资本账户里替我支付费用，这份费用付款是合法支付而且只能被我使用，因为这些钱最终是由我替我自己支付的。所有这些费用支付都不应该被误认为是什么捐款。
----2018年2月6日。
02-04-2018 My father still alive but not on public welfare (我父亲还在但不由民政局援助）
Heard my father is alive.
My response: I heard through this morning's messy arguments that my father is alive but he is not his own pension or provided through Chinese government's welfare as I am provided through U.S. government welfare system.
It was decided on July 1st of 2004 that my mother would have some financial help because she lost her pension. I do not remember what is the financial arrangement decided about my father because he should have his pension from Chinese Academy of Science Nanjing Purple Mountain Observatory. It was not about to save some expenses, I knew for certain from my own experience of living in China after 1980 time, they won't have a chance to enjoy what I provided for them without me ensuring that. It did shock me how he could be threatened to "lose" his own pension. He may be on the emergency arrangement of my providing.
A lot of people have puzzled how that rumor could be possible, it is actually the typical 1980 is about. This "how could it possible" is possibly the same reason that my father got up from the ground on his own and left home without taking his Bankcard where his pension should be deposited. He was announced dead after he ousted from his own home this way.
The rumor I heard is he was pushed out of a moving vehicle after he was pretty much dragged in. And when he was threatened that Do not call the police, Do not try to the get pension, and if he dares to demand the pension, he won't have a next meal to eat. By rumor, my father was pushed out by the current Chinese Premier Li, and all these threats were told by a female with the current Chinese Premiere's Li's presence. I heard this rumor can be verified from Satellite records.
The typical 1980 means there was no pre-arrangement to ensure my father could get up from his fall, there was no pre-arrangement to let my father have some food or lodging. And it means that after all these were said, my father has nothing to do with those who pushed him out of the moving vehicle and threatened him unless my father called police or demanding his pension. My father is not the person know this language smartness. He just got up and left home without his pension. When I finally have some cash to call his home phone in January of 2015, I was told my father was announced dead on October 4th, 2013. I survived similar "how could it possible" situation in 2014 and I started to call police ever since I was told I am supposed to live in poverty and die in this apartment I am currently residing.
Another typical 1980 is, for example, if you do not have a bank card or a bank statement, the bank employee who opened your banking account can tell you know nothing about if you have any saving in this bank. If you go to the Clear Channel radio company now, this "no such money in our keeping " may be the standard answer you will hear if you ask where is my major featured person fee. I did not receive a penny and I did not have any reference to say there is such a radio program ever produced by Clear Channel (IHeartRadio), even though it was such a worldwide popular radio program. In 2016 time, I was still on Boston 96.9FM when there was rumored that radio company would pay this $3Billion major featured person fee. And the Jessica group took it with nothing wrong attitude and till today, it is not in my possession. No lawsuit about it because I can't even afford attorney fees. I called police on this as well.
I am searching for my father because I saw his searching me advertising he requested to be posted on August 11 of 2015 on Chinese Consulate website.
（http://newyork.china-consulate.org/chn/fwzc/zxtz/t1070938.htm）
Following was posted by my younger brother, as he told me, on August 29th of 2013. My father's one is August 11th which two weeks before this August 29th which means unlikely an automatic extension.（2013年是我弟弟所登。但这2015年是在到期2个星期之前，不是什么自动延期）。
(http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/ce/cgny/chn/lsyw/lsbh/xqxx1/t1070938.htm)
----February 4th, 2018
听说了我父亲确实还在。
我的回应：听说今天早上的广播是乱七八糟的，不过结论就是我父亲还在，但不是由中国的民政系统提供生活资助。
因为我母亲在80年代时失去了退休金，2004年7月1日我信托财产那天有决定我母亲由我供给生活费用。我不记得我父亲的生活费用是怎么决定的，因为他应该有中科院南京紫金山天文台的退休金。不是我不肯替他付钱，我经历过中国的八十后年代，没有我在旁边盯着，他们根本没有可能用到这笔钱。我父亲居然会被恐吓而“失去”他的退休金，确实是挺吓人的。他有可能有一些紧急援助给付。
很多人都很奇怪，哪有可能会有这种传言, 其实这是典型的1980年代。这一份“哪有可能会就这样啊”可能是我父亲从地上自己爬起来，然后就这么没拿退休金提款卡就离开了家。他被这么赶出门后就被“宣告死亡”了。
02-03-2018 Authorized Providing to me from an Investment would be eventually deducted from my owner's account in my trust which should not be mistaken as a donation. (投资企业经授权所支付给我的费用最终是从我所继承的信托里我自己的东家账户中扣除，这些钱从来不是捐款。）
Heard this morning's talk about a Shanghai Investment.
My response: It is my apology to this Shanghai investment if my father just goes demand money without an authorized attorney's letter.
This Shanghai investment is invested by the Fund that causes O'Connors’ confusion. I heard Shanghai investment's management is aware that the American Investor Fund has a British Parent Fund as well as a French grandparent Fund.
I am the British East India Financier because my trust is the Investor of the British East India Financier Fund. The British East India Financier Fund is the investor of this Shanghai investment's American investor which make my trust an investor of this Shanghai investment.
My owner's accounts are all in the trusts that I inherited, not in this Shanghai Investment, this Shanghai Investment only has its American Investor as its Owner in its accounting book. So, even this Shanghai investment is an investment of my trust, it is not appropriate for my father to ask for providing from this Shanghai investment without appropriate authorization.
It is just like a banker who owns 10 restaurants, it is more appropriate for the banker to ask his manager who works with him to look after all these restaurants if he needs anything from these restaurants because not necessary all restaurants' staff know this banker. I am the same. I am privileged to leave an effective message to my digital recorder to my entrusting attorneys, my father should have the same privilege but the best is to contact me to avoid being neglected feeling.
I am asking my father to be patient, we are improving. It is a common sense that my father won't be in his current situation if I have been good, and we are in our current situation already means my attorneys must have been very busy. And I know, at least, the American law enforcement has been very busy ever since I started to call their help.
If my father has appropriate authorization to be provided for by this Shanghai investment, this Shanghai Investment need to book this providing from its American Investor's Owner's Account which means my father's providing would be deducted from the profit that this Shanghai investment owed to its American Investor's, the American Investor would deduct this providing from the British East India Financier Fund, and go on that eventually my father's providing would be deducted from my owner's account's receivable in my trust. So, if this Shanghai Investment is instructed by its American Investor to provide from my father from American Investor's owner's account, the providing is lawfully provided for my father's exclusive usage because it is eventually my providing for my father. None of this authorized providing should be mistaken for some donations.
I heard my father has an attorney's letter but I do not have any such letter myself, so I am asking my attorneys to check out what is the complaint this Shanghai Investment has filed.
----February 3rd, 2018
Heard what happened on the radio program and related is because it is a CIA project.
My response: No such thing. The rumored U.S. Military CIA personnel is a Miss Pejoves whose last name already means she has huge interest conflicts with me. Her involvement in all kinds of radio program related may have sparked such rumors. I heard U.S. Military has no such CIA project targeted me as rumored, it can be verified if what I heard is true.
Another group people that may spark CIA project rumors is the Chinese 1989 Student movement group. That is obviously impossible anything valid.
I heard the American Pejoves Fund I inherited through inheriting my trust is the investor Fund of Ford's Holding. I have nothing to do with Ford name as Ford house announced.
I heard there are tons of business peoples are so annoyed that I announced this American Pejoves Fund, O'Connors' confusion Fund, both French Funds' American Investments and the Portugal fund's American Investment as $200 Billion each incorrectly which is not encouraging, so I change my announcements now that from this day of February 3rd of 2018, all these funds I inherited that I mistakenly announced $200 Billion each are now officially going up to at least $2000Billion each.
----February 3rd, 2018
Heard this morning's crying talk about where's her grandparent's money.
My response: I repeat what I said in the morning that her grandparents never told me.
Explanation: I heard her grandparents（方智强） died in 1961, I know my grandparents died before and in 1965. I was born in 1967, I never met her grandparents or my grandparents. My father never even heard his own father's secret money hidden place. How could I possibly know where her grandparents hid their money?
Regarding if my attorneys have her grandparents money, I say everyone already knows my attorneys are good enough to inform her if they know her grandparents' money hidden place.
And if I hear any rumor about her grandparents' money, I can tip law enforcement since unlikely unaware where she is can be the reason.
----February 3rd, 2018
Heard some confusion why I make such a big fuss about my father.
My response: My father is alive. He was threatened not to call police as well as not to take his pension. My father was told he won't be tolerated to live if he dares to demand his pension. I heard it was recorded by Sattelite image when he was pushed out from the moving vehicle. The female who threatened him is also a granddaughter of Fang, Zhiqiang(方智强). I am not certain if the name is correct by most likely a cousin to my grandfather 方智仁. My father is not the person knows what she said only means by dictionary definition and never imply anything else. My father did not take his bank card with him when he left his own home. He probably thought how could it possibly mean anything malicious just like what I had been through in 2014 time. In 2015 after I became a sworn U.S. citizen, I was yelled at that I should throw out my no longer in use Chinese passport. I did not listen. I have called U.S. law enforcement's help after I heard this rumor.
----February 3rd, 2018
听说了今天早上谈到的一个在上海的投资企业。
我的回应：如果真是我的父亲方文海在没有适当的由授权律师所出具信件的情况下就跑去找他们要钱，我替我父亲方文海向他们道歉。
这家上海企业是有一个美国基金投资的，也就是让两百多个O'Connors为谁才够资格做东家而困扰不已的那家美国基金公司投资的。我听说了这家上海企业很清楚他们的美国基金投资公司是有一家全资的上级英国公司及全资的上上级法国公司的。
我是英国东印度公司的投资人就是因为英国的东印度公司是由我的信托投资的。英国东印度公司的法国投资公司是这家上海企业的上上上级投资公司，所以我也就是这家上海企业的投资人了。
我的主家资本账户是在我所继承的信托里，不在这家上海企业里， 这家企业账本上只有其上级美国基金投资公司作为主家有主家资本账户。所以尽管这家上海企业是我的信托所投资的，尽管方文海是我父亲，他也不可以在没有授权的情况下直接跑去公司拿钱。
就象有个银行家开了10家饭店，这个银行家要是需要什么东西，最恰当的就是联络和他有直接工作关系的替他照看餐馆的经理，因为那些餐馆员工不见得人人都认识这个银行家。我也是一样。我是在我自己的手机录音机上就可以有效留言给我的信托律师，我父亲应该也可以。但我父亲最好是和我联络以免感觉被忽视了。
02--02-2018 中国政府2004年参加的是”联合国研讨会（United Nation's Seminar)"
听说了今天早上的用中文表达的疯人狂言“你死，你活，我都要你的钱”。
我的回应：这女的估计是个疯子，可以狂言凭着她那些可能是钻裆夺权的中国贪官污吏孩子爹就可以就是要定了我的钱。就凭她一对老奶子一个干瘪老屁股而我还没那根棍子，她就敢如此狂言，我只能说她是一个疯子。
在我的广播剧不指名就如此宣布，我就是认定是对我进行恐吓威胁。中国政府的现任官员好像已经不再强调为中国人民服务，就只强调自己乐意。中国的老话"当官不为民做主，不如回家种红薯“似乎已经有了新的含义叫做:"当官就是乐意撑腰，揣钱回家才是富豪”。
我是美国公民，我就是不明白中华人民共和国国库的钱怎么都没有啦？中国经济糟糕的什么程度啦，需要中国政府官员为中国人民向世界人民敲诈勒索啊？虽然我继承财产是真，可那些基金的工作人员可都是世界人民呢。
今天早上谈到的“捐款”，谁捐？如果说是因为我对一些美国公司生意的贡献，那也应该是由美国公司付钱可以打入生意成本省税啊，怎么让公司的外国老板自己私人付钱？再说啊，如果是因为我对美国公司生意的贡献，那也是应该“亲兄弟明算账”的方式，哪有随便捐两个子就打发了？美国是有智慧产权法也有劳工法的，我可是一路都在报警一路都在痛骂，没给吓的一声不啃就一副只要他们肯给两个子就行的态度。
就是因为一些人故意把这些由上级公司授权并从上级公司的资本账户支付的合法款项说成是捐款，才造成我现在的经济状态是“没人会相信我是个超级富豪”。听说我父亲经济也是个惨吧吧的。
他们吵的这些“就是配，才是真正够资格的”，强调的就是他们才是够资格使用这些“捐款的”, 而捐款就应该是谁都可以用的，所以不准我用，不准我花，一口一声要杀了我。我是控告他们根本就是谋财害命，因为按照传言，所有一切威胁都不只是说说而已。
我方敏强调，所有这些由美国基金按其上级公司要求从其上级公司的资本账户里合法支付的款项都不是什么捐款，而是我方敏的生活费用。听说今天早上就这一点已经予以强调了。
我非常不理解的就是中国政府的愤怒。我所宣称拥有的美国基金都是已经在美国几百年的基金，就没有任何可能会是从1949年才成立只有68岁的中华人民共和国贪污偷窃所得，中国政府以及中国政府官员在愤怒什么？我在美国生活是个美国公民，我在美国说我拥有这个那个美国基金，关中华人民共和国什么事需要中国政府官员用各种方式表达“你凭什么说你有钱？” 是美国政府的法律官员在说我继承财产是真实，说我拥有这个那个基金是真实，为什么中国政府就是必须说那根本是撒谎？
听说今天早上的严词强列否认并强调从未参与任何2004年和我有关会议的说法，据说是吓坏了一群亲眼在电脑屏幕上看见他们坐在那儿的中外男女。我赶紧解释一下，他们当时是在参加“联合国研讨会(United Nation's seminar)”。他们的气愤就是美国政府弄了一个什么唐太宗李世民的继承人在那吵个没停，我听说最经典的例子就是当时的中国人民银行的周小川行长，他是作为中国政府的代表参加会议，他还没来得及说话，我已经一串一串的英语就说完了。据说是气了十年。（*等我找到我那篇有关那天大概有多少场“研讨会（seminar)”的博文，我会放个连接在这。）
听说今天早上已经说明当时不是由联合国的任何机构或者美国外交部联络中国政府官员参加会议的。我估计是因为当时谈的都是经济发展，可能有中国外交部人员认为会有益于中国，听说当时是有世界各国政府官员在那儿讨论各种经济发展计划。我并不在他们的讨论区里，我只是在我自己的聊天室里回答一些我认为向我提出的问题。我当时没有参加视讯，只是电话参与，所以经常误以为我听到的就是在向我提问。
今天早上说到的一个美国外交部人员所参与协调的是指协调召集我的继承&信托会议的相关参加人员(Inheriting group)，不是之后陆续参加的政府工作人员。
但我还是得说：
我方敏拒绝所有这些由中华人民共和国政府官员所撑腰的要钱要求。
我方敏拒绝所有这些由中华人民共和国政府官员所撑腰的敲诈勒索要求。
我方敏拒绝所有这些由中华人民共和国政府官员所撑腰的恐吓威胁。
----2018年2月2日。
02-01-2018 Happy to be the person that not Stuck-in there
Heard this morning's announcement that I have nothing to do with any Ford.
My response: Glad to hear that. I do feel very comfortable to seek anything that only means law and justice only.
There were six children announced in the British interview last week or so, I heard all from the same birthfather and none carry my blood. Ford name never has anything to do with me is a true statement which only relieved me from possible stuck-in there situation. I go on living my own wealthy life on my own birth grandfathers' blessing without piss-off emotions is a happy thing that I am very willing to do.
Currently, I am still listening to the rumors about that published girl in 2012. I heard she resembles me and my ancient beauty grandmother's painting so much to the degree that rumored it was a fake imitation made from my photos, but she does not resemble my childhood looks. And I also heard that it was not a photo or painting but a videotape. I am not concerned if she is my own child that has been taken good care of or if I can have own children because I do have "entrusted my wishes to have my own children". My entrusted wealth is safe, so as my being respected wishes.
I heard that the introduced one in last week's British interview resembled the girl in another videotape who won't let go her father's hand. This one, in last week's British interview, does not resemble the 2012 girl by rumors.
Regarding this morning's announcement of "shit this name", it may be part of the organized hate crime I did call law enforcement's help about. I do not know if the announcer is the victim or a participant.
----February 1st, 2018
Heard "Next Kin" inheriting law is the reason for current radio program's producing effort.
My response:
I, Min Fang, refuse to let any of my lawful wealth to go to (or owned by) any next kin of mine.
I, Min Fang, refuse to let any of my lawful wealth go to (or owned by) anyone who has publicly and/or privately announced deservedness or intends to announce deservedness publicly and/or privately.
I, Min Fang, refuse to let any of my lawful wealth to go to (or owned by) anyone who has committed/participated or intend to commit/participate murder and/ or hate-crime that intended(intend) to make me a victim of.
I, Min Fang, refuse to let any of my lawful wealth to become No-Owner wealth through intentionally spread hate crime that targets me in order to make my lawful wealth a no-owner wealth.
I, Min Fang, refuse to let any of my lawful wealth to go to any charity without my clear instruction.
I, Min Fang, refuse to let any of my lawful wealth to be owned by any organization or any charity as well as any government.
I, Min Fang, refuse to let any of my privately owned lawful wealth to become any format of public wealth through any criminal effort.
(*The pressure of writing this to save my own life was the reason I started to send letters to FBI in January of 2015).
----February 1st, 2018
A lot of people said my response pissed off so many people which would get myself into a lot of troubles.
My response: I was almost killed in 2014 and I am still having so many troubles before I even know anything to respond at all. I survived 2014 public murder time in Boston without even knowing what's going on. Now, my response from awareness can only help myself better my situation. Only better.
Regarding the wife's announcement this morning about none-of-my-business matters, I have to say that the obvious intention from this morning's broadcasting is to arouse those freaked-out females to seek protection from those who organized this hate crime against me. I can leave message on my own cellphone to my own attorneys to help myself and I have constantly called law enforcement's help, I am the person who has no reason to be afraid of and I am the person who can't afford to be afraid of that but to fight against those who are behind this organized hate crime against me.
----February 1st, 2018
Heard this morning's attorney speaking on my matter bur representing Albert Gore.
My response: Albert Gore has nothing to do with me for him to say anything on any matter. And I refuse to let Albert Gore have any saying over my any matter. Please contact 911 police if he insists on you to listen to his saying about my matter which certainly would put you into legal troubles, or call his psychiatrist daughter or any psychiatrist about his severe illusion that he can have any saying over my any matter. He is probably having some sever psychiatry medical situation called Delusional disorder if he indeed just won't stop insisting on having saying over not-his-to-say my any matter, please call 911 or the psychiatrist daughter who will certainly help Albert Gore.
----February 1st, 2018
01-31-2018 Do I have my own biological children yet?
Heard this morning's broadcasting of who is the richest E. Ford's children's mother.
My response: I heard there was another interview in Britain last week as well, two 7-ish children and the wife's children are only 6 months in age difference.
I heard several strategic reasons for this children creation stories.
1: Most shocking one. It was from President Barack Obama representing his administration made the decision that these children were born to teach me a lesson who the fuck I am.
2: Tina O'Connor intentionally ordered this two children as one pair of the six-pairs just to tell everyone who the fuck I am.
3: The birthfather intentionally did this to be able to abuse these children to tell me who the fuck I am.
4: the wife is the daughter of the East India Company's Financier's CEO.
It is very necessary for the announced birth-father doing the British Interview last week, it is my no-choice situation that I have to make myself clear that I have been protected ever since I was born from the group that my grandfathers had entrusted their blessing to me. My children are not that cheap to be 6 months older than a wife's children from the same birth father.
I am truly disgusted by all these rumors. My opinion, if these children are strategically born instead of the romantic issue, the strategist of this children-birth story, made-up or real, is either a mother-fucker or a whore-born, no a chance to be neither.
I am the British East India Company's Financial for real. The inheritable family wealth of the announced birthfather of the children is less than 1/4 of what I have announced as my inherited on this blog and already started provided for me since 2015 in reality. He is not that expensive to have this opportunity to abuse my children for whatever value he cherishes, but why would a financial industry CEO's daughter who married in 2007 need to compete with a pregnant woman, surrogate or not, about who's child should be his heir? I heard the girl was born in 2010 or 2011.
So, exactly who are my children? I am confused as well.
One, it was acknowledged that the "birth father" tend to provide inaccurate information if in situations in the interview, so, the question is if he provided accurate information when he mentioned that the eldest girl of his six children was published as my daughter in 2012?
I am a scientific engineer who believes in factual evidence. I say to my attorneys that I stop any of my providing to those two children because I doubt if they carry my blood. I refuse to acknowledge any child to be mine without carrying my blood. Whoever is taking care of providing for my children on my behave know for certain that my children are never this cheap,
What if there are really no such my-blood-carriers yet? Will my life get impacted by this morning's clarification? Not a bit. My life won't change a bit because I never live on that e. Ford's any money. I am currently waiting for my own wealth to finish entrusting. After that, I go on to have my children carry my own blood with a man who has the heart to be my loving mate. That is all I need to do. I am lucky enough that I have my grandfathers blessing for pretty much everything and I freed myself since 2004 from the possibility of being forever in-pregnancy, it won't be my misery if I need to start fresh. Who would against a younger smooth love but fight for an old dry with some none-biological-children, even there is only one such child. Why would I?
To me, a $40,000 yearly income great young man is the same as a Billionaire rich man on financial matters because of my own birth grandfathers' handsome blessing. I am not picky at all on a possible mate's financial well-being. I am the person who had worked hard to make my own handsome intellectual income before I inherited my grandfathers' blessing, I value things a lot differently with a lot of females who are born into or marry into financial well-being.
----January 31st, 2018
听说了今天早上所提到的“为什么”。
我的回应：我来汇报一下我都听到了多少个为什么.
"你要是有钱，为什么就不能给他或她一点。”
我回答：我有钱，只因为有个他或她想要也需要，你就替他或她跟我要钱，也就是你在替他或她讨饭就是了，否则谁不需要钱哪。街边上讨饭的哪一个不是因为觉得过路人有钱，而讨饭的确实需要才讨的呀？可你讨得也太狠了点，不是一分两分，是豪宅名车貂皮大衣，还要永远如此。我方敏就是拒绝给钱。
你要真是需要帮助，去慈善机关就得。只要你属于慈善帮助的对象，符合条件，他们会帮助你，不会给你脸色看的。我所继承的财产都有支持慈善。需要说明的是，虽然是我方敏的投资在捐款，但这些钱都是当地人挣得，所以“同样来自中国大陆”不会是优先得到慈善帮助的任何原因。
“你要是继承了财产，为什么就不能对中国做点贡献”
我回答：你指的是对中华人民共和国960万平方公里和十三亿人民做贡献吗？文化上，2008年北京奥运会残奥会开闭幕式；经济上，蔬菜大棚，城市公交地铁，等等，这可都是2004年我继承财产以后对中国的贡献。你想要的究竟是什么具体的贡献？
“你要是有钱，为什么就不能给你弟弟老婆一点钱”。
我回答：我的母亲作为我父亲的老婆被我父亲养着，吃住我父亲的，就是因为她自己没有收入就被我弟弟的老婆找了一堆的朋友来教训教训要我母亲识相点，别忘了她自己就只是个没有收入的人。我作为我母亲的女儿，我就是不乐意给这个所谓弟弟的老婆一分一厘我的钱。我就是不乐意给这个所谓的弟弟的老婆所生的任何杂种非杂种一分一厘我的钱，更不用说大把钱。我方敏就是拒绝给任何钱。
“我就是不明白，那些有钱男人已经是一次次的宣布和你一点关系都没有，你为什么还说你很有钱？”
我回答: 因为我的钱不是那些有钱男人给的，而是我自己亲生的爷爷们给的。我的钱和他们家里财产有一些投资伙伴的关系，就这关系。
他们一次次的宣布和我没关系，有些是出于他们自己的生活状态以及和我的矛盾，有些是不堪被这些来自中国的愤怒言语及被要求协助非法分我所继承的财产所骚扰。
“我就是不明白，为什么你有钱，我怎么没有？”
我回答：你很清楚你和我一点血缘关系都没有，而我的钱是我自己亲生爷爷给我的，你还问为什么你没有？
你是在强调中国是个大妓院,而你是中国大妓院成员之一吗？也就是你虽然和我没有性关系，你也可以凭你的裤裆应该有钱吗？你也是因为弄不清性交，夫妻性关系与父母子女之间因父母性交而产生的血脉传承关系的区别吗？还能有什么原因你就是不明白，我的钱和你一点关系都没有，你还就是必须要让我把话跟你说清楚还必须让你弄明白为止，还特别够资格就是愤怒？
你得先问问谁愿意做你的嫖客再问凭什么。我方敏拒绝做你的嫖客，我方敏拒绝让你幻象你可以凭你的裤裆来要我的钱。
“我就是不明白，你有钱，为什么你的亲戚却是一点都没有？”
我回答：我继承的是信托，是我的爷爷们因为我是个女继承人另外给的。我的亲戚们都已经在他们的父辈去世分家产时拿到了他们自己的那一份，这包括我父亲的兄弟姊妹也都在他们的父亲1965年去世时拿到了他们父亲给的财产。中华人民共和国的信托法和继承法可以帮助你了解很多什么是信托继承或者继承信托。
我的父亲目前是失踪，我到目前为止都没有听说我父亲继承了什么财产，而我父亲的毕生积蓄和唯一的一套房子估计已经被他唯一的儿子（我弟弟）转移到了我弟弟的名下。
我所继承的信托不是我父亲给的，是我的爷爷们，也就是我父亲的父亲及爷爷们给的。
“我就是不明白，你有钱，为什么你要吃救济？”
我的回应：我不是在吃救济。因为信托财产之后经常会出现一些这样那样的意外状况，而且因为法律为保障信托人的利益而设置的一系列规范，财产信托后再更改信托财产时所决定的生活供给很难，所以在我2004年继承信托后，因为健康原因又再办理所继承财产的诚信托付时，有人建议我的生活供给通过美国政府的福利系统给付以保障我的生活不至于因为一些意外状况而真的流落街头没饭吃。我现在的生活低水平就是因为一些这样那样的状况，这些状况目前已经在法律处理当中了。
----2018年1月30日。
01-29-2018 为什么说管理是真才实学而不只是机遇而已
听说了今天早上的广播所提到的“方敏和中国没有性关系所以方敏不可能是由中国的大学毕业"。
我的回应：今天早上的这份宣传观点就是中国国内过去几年一直作为中国政府观点立场进行宣传的，稍有不同是的所强调的是方敏和中国国家领导人没有性关系是中华人民共和国不需要方敏的任何“贡献”，也不相信方敏有可能会有任何成就能力可以对中华人民共和国做任何贡献的原因。据说这是由中国国家主席习近平所主导的宣传。
我方敏强调：如果中国国家主席习近平是由于为中国人民做贡献的决心以及为中国人民做贡献的政绩被当选为中华人民共和国的主席的，在2004年会议期间见过方敏本人，又很清楚方敏过去十年独立生活经历的情况下，就没有可能认为方敏是那种靠着脱裤子挣钱挣地位的。没有任何可能。
作为一个非大众妓院国家的领导者，和作为一个非妓院卖淫企业的管理者，所共同的地方就是都是在领导一群穿着裤子凭着裤裆以外的能力为自己挣钱为国家企业做贡献的人们。就没有任何可能会有凭着非裤裆能力得到提拔的又公认有能力的管理者会不清楚如何识别鉴定评估所需要管理人群及其他人群大概的能力及潜质的。
很多人认为中华人民共和国1949年建国初期的很多领导人，特别是中国军队的领导人，很多根本一个大字都不识，他们可以把1950年代的中国给管理的欣欣向荣，管理还有什么难的？
管理从来不是画画圆圈盖盖图章。中国五十年代的领导人都是从中国国内战争的浴火中，带着他们所管理的军人，在真刀实枪生死一瞬间的战场上，他们是靠着一次次可以成功的带着下属打赢战役活着回来被提拔的。任何人都清楚，在面对刺刀子弹的战场上，仅仅有着英俊容颜及浑圆屁股是没有可能生存的，更不用说因此获得提拔，因为提拔他们就意味着让那些被他们所领导的下属牺牲的没有任何价值，并威胁其他协作部队的军人生命，更没有可能赢得一场战役的胜利。当这些1949年部队的领导者率领着他们的部下迈着整齐的胜利步伐开进北京，南京，上海等等，在1921年成立的中国共产党只有仅仅28年成长经历的1949年，就已经夺得中国960万平方公里土地的政府管理权，你说他们根本不懂管理？
共产主义从来不是打家劫舍，天下大同从来不是共产共妻（共产共夫）。最早的中国共产党人都是家境宽裕家庭出生的，有条件接受非常良好文化教育的优秀又有文化人才。他们倡导共产主义，愿意实现天下大同的美好世界可不是因为他们痛恨自己的父母兄姐所以希望劳苦群众在他们自己的率领下，砸了他们自己的家，强奸了他们自己的姐妹妻母，甚至杀了他们自己的父母亲属。从来不是。
中华人民共和国最早的那批共产党领导人是凭着他们的那份坚定执着的信念，凭着他们对美好生活的那份向往，凭着他们能够让劳苦大众了解共同奋斗创造平等富裕生活的那份能力，凭着他们愿意为中国人民做贡献的那份决心，熬过了两万五千里长征雪山草地的艰难困苦，挺过了家人的不解指责。所有这一切，从来都不是为了让他们自己的生活可以荣华富贵美女如云。从来不是。
1949年的中华人民共和国的领导人，不仅个个都是凭着出色管理能力及相互的协作团队精神赢得了960万平方公里的土地上的集体管理权，更是凭着他们那一腔为人民服务让大家过上美好日子的共同决心赢得了中国当时四万万同胞的认可和追随，他们能够把1950年代的中国给管理的欣欣向荣，从来不是件容易也不是什么偶然的事，更不是什么画画圈圈而已。他们那一批是真正有能力有意愿为中国人民奉献的中国人民的管理者。
我相信天下大同的美好，但我不是共产主义者，我认为在目前的物质世界还没有达到实现共产主义所需的极大丰富的前提下，以强调奉现精神而人为强制推行按需所得而非按劳所得是非常不现实的。原因就在于目前的物质世界让人们需要的东西实在太多而供应又实在有限，实在是不够按需分配呢。我赞成聚沙可以成塔，我反对拆塔就只为人人都有一粒沙。
至于这种由同一个女人的两个男人以这个女人嫉妒了为名对我实施的一切是个计谋的说法，也就是一个中国国家总理李克强通过外交部实行在国际上对我方敏的谩骂羞辱，一个是由中国国家主席习近平通过组织中国国内宣传机制对我方敏实施诋毁造谣全面否定，这还是在所有组织者及参与者完全清楚我和中国国家总理李克强就只是在1991年一次饭局和一个电话的过往，和中国国家主席习近平没有任何交往的情况下，，请问是谁需要中国国家主席习近平和中国国家总理李克强共同拥有一个妻子以实现什么样的国家民族及人民的利益？请问由中国国家总理李克强和中国国家主席习近平对我方敏这一番全面否定及谩骂羞辱想要实现的是什么样的共同目标？究竟是什么利益团体的共同目标？这是在宣传强调中华人民共和国的国家领导人在国内共妻已是事实的情况下，就必须由中国政府机构为中华人民共和国的共妻国家领导人推行所谓的国际共同拥有我方敏的财产吗？
我方敏拒绝这届中华人民共和国政府的睾丸讹诈，我方敏拒绝这届中华人民共和国政府的恐吓威胁，我方敏拒绝这届中华人民共和国政府的敲诈勒索。
----2018年1月29日。
01-28-2018 My Grandfather's Romances（我爷爷的浪漫）
Heard this morning's talk about the romance of the most famous Chinese female writers Zhang, Ailing(张爱玲) and Zhang, Lingyu（张玲玉）.
My response: I heard this morning's broadcasting was soundtrack extracted from original videotape recorded in the 1940s.
My grandmother's maid family name is Mao(毛), a junior high graduated.
She was betrothed to my grandfather before they both even born by my great-great-grandfather. She married my grandfather when he was 18 years old in 1930 and my father was born in 1932. My father is my grandfather's birthmark palms heir. My grandparents had shared 4 children together, my father is 10 years older than his brother Xiahai(侠海) who is the youngest child.
My father's elder younger sister resemble my grandmother a lot. My grandmother was not a beauty is a true statement. And she had very rough dark skin and chubby body.
My father's junior younger sister resembles my grandfather. I heard he was about my father's height and Shanghai style of handsome and cute young man.
I heard that my grandfather's younger brother's name is Zhiqing(智清) who married an elementary school graduated.
Both my grandfather and his younger brother were college graduated.
I will correct my own saying of how faithful my grandfather was to my grandmother. My grandmother had been very happy in her marriage. I heard her advise to her elder daughter before her wedding was "a marriage is matched by God".
----January 28th, 2018
听说了今天早上提到了中国最著名的女作家张爱玲和张玲玉。
我的回应：我听说今天早上播出的是当年（40年代）的原版影带的原声音带资料。
我奶奶的娘家姓毛（被误称为芒或茅）, 她是初中毕业的， 不是小学毕业。
我爷爷奶奶是被我曽曾祖父指腹为婚的。我奶奶是在1930年我爷爷18岁的时候嫁给我爷爷的，我父亲是1932年出生,。我父亲是我爷爷的胎记掌纹继承人。我爷爷奶奶共育有两子两女，我父亲和他弟弟侠海相差10岁。侠海是四个孩子中最小的一个。
我父亲的大妹妹文美长的像极了我奶奶。我奶奶长的非常不漂亮这种说法真是一点都不假， 她还很黑很胖皮肤也很粗。
我父亲的小妹妹文玉长得很像我爷爷。我听说我爷爷个子和我父亲一样高，是个英俊儒雅的上海青年。
我听说我爷爷弟弟的名字是智清，他的妻子是小学教育程度。
我爷爷和他弟弟两兄弟都是大学毕业。
我会纠正我自己常说的我爷爷是如何的忠实于我的奶奶这种说法。但我奶奶一直是个很幸福的妻子。我听说我奶奶在我爸爸的大妹妹结婚之前给她的忠告就是：“婚姻是天作之合”。
----2018年1月28日。
01-27--2018 Is there any difference between the Proud of Ignorance and the Proud of Knowledge?（拥有无知的骄傲和拥有知识的骄傲有区别吗？）
Heard this morning's talk about a locked-up who is good at Astrophysics.（中文附后）
My response: Definitely not my father.
Most of the audience who read this blog may still remember that my father is broadcasted a college astrophysics major graduated but absolutely not a good one but a loser only in this Astrophysics profession.
Now, everyone may already have guessed who might be the major producer of this morning's episode. My mother can be so miserable that she became an undocumented resident in 1988 and had to go "dead(missing)" from her husband's life in 2006 won't be an easy situation.
----January 27th, 2018
Heard this strategy to use psycho ex-romance to attack is inspired by a chat in 2004 about how to investigate a possibly "corrupted" Chinese Customs officer who may have a "secret" romance life.
My response: I have heard this kind of smartness since 2014 that I have accused Albert Gore, who announced his proud of doing this by rumor I heard, a Murder Attempted for my money that he has used public channel media as an armed weapon to perform his public robbery of my intellectual income.
It is solely his own ignorance of what means intellectual as well as what knowledge it takes to earn Intellectual Income, and it is solely his own incapability to know what freedom means that made him so angry of who I am that he constantly challenges those who sworn to make this United States a lawful slavery-free one.
Now, I am asking the person who is currently so proud of doing such attacks, what is the objective?
----January 27th, 2018
In China, we have a saying to describe what means Knowledge.
If you have ever seen a sea, you know what means vast and what means tiny;
If you have ever seen the Himalaya, you know what means majestic and what means insignificant ;
If you have ever commute in Shanghai city, you know what means a crowd and what means a single.
Albert Gore is not even from Pharmaceutical or Medical related college education or work experiences, it is only ignorance can make him so proud to announce on a public media that he deserves to assign the rightful owner of some intellectual making that can only be earned and evaluated by possessing pharmaceutical related knowledge. And he did that for pretty much every knowledge he did not possess through his education or his personal work/life experience. And he can do such thing only because he can have access to a public media to loop the reason as he was a Vice President to lead the United States for a reason, and that reason is he was a Vice President to lead the United States for a reason, and that reason is.....
----January 27th, 2018
听说了今天早上的广播提到了一个天体物理专业很强的囚犯。
我的回应：那肯定不是俺爹。
很多听众如果也看过这个博客一定记得，广播剧里播出有关我父亲是天体物理学家身份的“老情人采访篇”，那几个人对我父亲的评价所强调的就是我父亲虽然是个天体物理专业的大学毕业生，但其实就是个一无是处根本没有任何专业成就的完完全全的失败者。(一个是“真正头胎女儿”的妈妈，一个是“真正红颜最爱”，还有一个估计也有故事）
现在，估计每一个人都已经猜到谁是今天早上这集广播剧的制作人了。我母亲会如此悲惨，在1988年就没有了人事档案弄得就跟盲流似的，2006年还必须从自己丈夫的生活里“死亡（失踪）", 事情确实不会那么简单啊。
----2018年1月27日。
听说这找个痴狂老情人来攻击的策略是启发于2004年一段如何侦办中国海关一个可能另有“秘密”婚姻的”贪官”的一段交谈。
我的回应：我从2014年起就听说了这么聪明的讲法。我是一直指责阿尔伯特·高尔，也就是我听说为此特别骄傲的一个，根本是想谋财害命，跟本是在用公共媒体作为武器实施针对我智慧产权的公然武装抢劫。
这完全是有因为阿尔伯特·高尔自己无知才会不明白什么是智慧以及需要多少知识才能挣到知识产权收入，这完全是因为阿尔伯特·高尔自己不懂什么是自由才会让他对我鄙视不屑而不停的挑衅那些誓言让美国是一个没有奴役的法治国家的人们。
现在，我想问问目前还在为这计策而骄傲的那些人，你们想要达到的目的是什么？
----2018年1月27日。
在中国，我们是这么形容什么叫知识的。
你如果见过大海，你就知道什么是浩瀚，什么是渺小；
你如果见过喜马拉雅山，你就知道什么是宏伟，什么是卑微；
你如果在上海坐过通勤地铁，你就知道什么是群雄（争霸）*，什么是独影（自怜）**。
（*是通勤者。**是地铁公司当班雇员。）
阿尔伯特·高尔根本就不是医药相关专业毕业的或者是工作过的，只有无知才会让他在大众媒体上如此骄傲的宣布他就是够资格指定谁才是应该领取只有拥有医药相关知识才有可能挣到或是参与评估的智慧产权收入。他根本就没有相关的专业技能或者工作及人生经历，他还做了一堆这样的宣布。他能这么宣布也就是因为他霸着个公共话筒说着他的循环理由，也就是说他能当美国总统领导美国是有原因的，这原因就是他能当美国总统领导美国是有原因的，这原因就是。。。
01-26-2018 My Mother may still alive（我母亲应该还活着）
Heard this morning's talk about my mother may still alive（中文附后）.
My response: I am thrilled to hear. I heard there are some curiosities about how my mother has possibly managed in these years if she is still in China. I know there are tons of Chinese citizens move around who call themselves "北漂，南漂“ which means undocumented immigrants who have no local city registry records. And if my mother has been provided for with housing and living expenses, she probably can stay in any big city without a National ID. And my mother has been "missing" since February of 2007 which was before 2012 when this administration of Chinese government's term started. I hope I can hear she is safe soon enough.
I am confident about her health because she has been enjoying the same level of healthcare as I have been enjoying from my inherited wealth that I call my grandfather's blessing. She has been a great daughter-in-law to all my grandfathers. She has already received four of my grandfathers' blessing that I have provided for her, and this providing will be from every one of my grandfathers and my grandmother who has blessed me financially. I am sorry I can't provide her any talents that my grandfathers and my grandmothers have blessed me, but I will provide her my own making from those talents I inherited.
My father is better because he knows my inheriting stories are real. My father had been my mother's provider since 1988 to February of 2007. And I am the provider for both of them since October of 2013. I hope I can get in touch with my father soon enough.
----January 26th, 20
听说今天早上提到了我的母亲可能还活着。
我的回应：我听了真是很感慨。我听说了有很多人质疑我母亲要是活着而且人也还在中国的话，她这些年怎么活下来的？我知道现在中国有很多”北漂南漂族”，也就是美国这边称为“无证件移民”的这种没有当地户籍及身份资料的一群人，我母亲要是有房子及生活费用供给，她甚至可能没有身份证也能活得挺好。而且我母亲是在2007年2月就已经“失踪”了，这是在2012年才组成的这届中国政府执政之前。我希望我可以尽快得知她是否安全的消息。
我对她的身体健康很有信心，我母亲的健康照顾供给和我是同一等级，都是由我所继承的财产也就是“我爷爷们给我的祝福”所提供的。我母亲真是我所有爷爷们的好媳妇。我母亲目前已经收到了由我所提供的我的四个爷爷们的祝福，她今后会收到由我所继承的爷爷奶奶们的信托所提供的我每一个爷爷及一个奶奶的祝福。我很抱歉我不能提供给我的母亲我所继承的爷爷奶奶们的才华， 但我今后可以提供给她我用这些才华自己挣到的钱。
我父亲的情况会好些，我父亲很清楚我继承信托的故事是真实。从1988年到2007年2月，我母亲的生活所需所想的一切都是由我的父亲独自全额承担的。从2013年10月开始，我父母两人的生活是由我承担的。我希望我可以尽快和我的父亲取得联系。
----2018年1月26日。
01-25-2018 Nanjing Institute of Drug Control and 1980 Style Understanding
Heard this morning's mention of "this radio program sucks".
My response: That was from a colleague from Nanjing Institute of Drug Control that I had worked with.
I had been getting along with almost everyone in that Institute other than the Boss, let me point out that I started working there in 1990 before I explain what possibly the issue can be.
Everyone who read this blog may already know what is PRC80 style talk which means "to understand verbal expression word by word according to dictionary definition", and another important part that keeps the conversation a conversation is the same style of response. It is not that I forgot to mention, I did not even know that is how I survived 1990-time China.
Let me give you an illustration.
Someone give me a $500 and said that this is because that person wants everyone to know that person wants nothing to do with another person.
I am the person have no idea of what the story has been or why, I am not in the situation that I would willing to do anything to ensure I can have that $500, and I don't really care if this person has anything to do with the other person or not, so I analyze this giving action as such following logic:
This person is willing to pay me $500 because I am one of the everyone group that needs to hear this person to express himself as "want nothing to do with another person", that seems OK.
So, I am not paid to ask why, and I am not paid to spread the word, and I am not paid to tell the other person, and I am not paid to ensure everyone else know I know this information in anyway and anyhow, and everyone else may also have this opportunity to have this same treatment of $500 as well which seems won't put me into any trouble or obligation to ensure that everyone knows this information, so it should be alright for me to pocket in this $500.
So, I take that $500 and respond to that person with "I hear you". And I finish the conversation completely and walk away with a $500 in a nothing-wrong-with-it tone.
This is possibly the reason I had with the Boss. He had been promoted a Boss in 1980, and his complaints about me have been "I understand everything he said but I don't give a shit about what he meant."
Now here comes this issue, most of the things he said were nothing to do with me things in my understanding. He tended to use examples of how he will do in a lot of situations to inspire me to react appropriately, but everything I heard was he had this or that issue of his own which shouldn't be my business at all. So, after this fully-aware-of-what-he-was-saying conversation, I walked away with my unchanged working style and never mentioned a word to anyone what he had said.
I heard his negative-ness against me was because he heard "I am a fake" from someone associated with that "firstborn" of "ex-girlfriend's child". I dislike his ridiculous negative opinions about me, and Chinese government may take what he did out of that negative-ness as his acts of revenge for 1989. He does have the character that made the other boss of the Institute as you heard on the radio.
I was famous after 1989, and a lot of people said why shouldn't I help with the Boss if he did have some issues in management, that is if I knew some managing.
Let me tell you that when I was an employee of that Institute, that Institute was perfectly human-resource-ly immune from most of the office politics.
I worked for pharmacology department which had three 2-persons each working groups. One group had one person who was very close to the department boss and this was balanced by the other person having the same seniority in the Institute as the department boss. My group was perfectly balanced one person who enjoyed taking the job as research with me disliked it. The third group was similarly balanced. Plus, the department boss had been balancing everyone's workload on a reason of "balancing bonus purpose" with everybody's full understanding. So, it had been noisy in my department but not really having any office politics.
Another department that we call chemistry department, most of its staff were single young girls that only 3 persons need to support a family. No issues at all for them.
The third department we call Chinese medicine department which had 4 peoples then. 2 females and two senior-in-age males. One female was a married sexy pretty and the other was a young cute school girl that both males willing to comprise themselves to make the other both happy. This was the department had no noise at all but harmony.
I guess what the Institute Boss had talked to me about were "frustrations" that may be from the only department that had not so balanced by human resource factor together with some other issues I considered none of my business.
If you still remembered what had broadcasted on the radio in 2007 or so, you probably would agree the broadcasting was reporting the Boss' negative-ness against me, etc.
----January 25th, 2018
01-23-2018 I have eye-witnessed my loving birth mother has been my father's spoiled-rotten lawful wife (我的成长见证了挚爱着我的生母才是我父亲宠坏了的结发妻子）
Heard this morning's talk about my father's "real true love"（中文附后）.
My response: I heard the reason my father went to Beijing in 1965 was to visit a current radio program Chinese team's producer's mother who my father had dated in Chinese Style when he was in Nanjing University between 1954-1957.
This female has been a major producer representing Chinese producing team since June in 2017 or so. She was born in December of 1967 or January of 1968 as the fourth child of her mother.
Her mother's confusion has been since her own graduation in 1959 or so. She was assigned to a Science Academy's Institute in Beijing. In 1965, my father had insisted on to go to Beijing was because she took my mother's wedding gift from my mother's eldest sister. It was an expensive watch that my grandfather's associated had sent. My mother's eldest sister took the rest of what my grandfather's associated had sent. My mother never even heard of this. When I was 3-4 years old already, my mother heard that her wedding gift, a new silk quilt cover, from her sister in Beijing was swapped by her eldest sister with a used one. Now, this.
Why would her mother felt so comfortable to take my mother's wedding gift after her mother already mothers three of her own husband's children? She graduated a year after my father's graduation, her first child with her own husband was born about two years after she left Nanjing. And it had been 7-8 years after she went to Beijing when my parents getting married, why would she feel so comfortable to take my mother's wedding gift after 7-8 years?
Do you remember the "first-born daughter" story? this is possibly the reason that 'first-born daughter's" mother fought that my father should buy her a dress instead of me. Why would they have this illusion that she could be so valuable after she already mothers three of her own husband's children in 1965? That is even if my father had touched her sexually before her marriage. She was the person went on getting married to another man, why she felt as if my father owed her?
I heard the daughter producer's theory is the producer's eldest brother should be understood as my father's real first-born, or the producer would be the heir of my grandfathers if her mother was the one who married my father.
First of all, I heard the producer's eldest brother was conceived after her mother's marriage and my father never touched her mother after her mother decided to marry someone else. I believe this can be verified from the satellite images. My father did not have much chance to visit Beijing in the 1960s. So, most likely, this Chinese female producer's eldest brother is not my father's biologically related.
Second of all, if this Chinese producer's mother did marry to my father, according to the common senses, since her mother's seeder is a different man, nobody would know who the production would be. Talking about fate, her mother is not the person has the fate to mother my grandfathers' heir because she did not recognize my father's value, which is the most important thing to those who love my father dearly. It is purely an illusion to fancy my grandfathers or their-associated would support that Chinese producer's mother because my father had touched her mother sexually, and my grandfathers' associated knew for certain that the Chinese producer's mother is not my father's first woman.
My mother is well-known married to my father into a bachelor's house that full of stacked-up paper boxes only. My mother did not even receive any wedding gift that is new, from her own maiden family or from my grandfathers' associated, which made her known for "not really unwanted". I am the daughter grew up watching my parents getting old, and my complaints about my father has been my father has spoiled my mother too rotten that I frequently need to do "some corrections" on my father's behave to stop my mother's "I want to have this or that" regardless what that may mean to what I want (my father never has his own wants), and my complaints have also been about how my mother needed my help to make the ends meet to cover her over spending of my father's money.
My mother is the person my grandfathers would cherish as a daughter-in-law for her caring to my father and our family, even if that is out of love being doubted. My mother has been the person taking good care of the family ever since the day she got married, my mother has been the person always put my father and me in front of herself. My mother has been a maid alike to my father and me with her full heart willingness and complete ignorance of who we are. If any of my grandfathers is still alive, I am confident my mother is the idealist daughter-in-laws in their wildest dream come true.
I am the heir of my grandfathers, this is no confusion at all to any of my grandfathers’ associated. I am the girl with their full support because who I am to my grandfathers. No one from my grandfathers’ associated would choose that Chinese producer or her mother over me, this is not just the confidence but a true statement in reality. I am birth-mothered and raised by my father's lawful wife and I stand by my loving birth mother always.
Why I need to be like this? If you heard rumors that she might be the reason my mother lost her human resource records(人事处档案) permanently in 1988 that made my mother a miserable undocumented, that she might be the reason made me lost my communist youth party membership record in 1994 or so permanently that cause so much controversy in Nanjing Institute of Drug Control, and that she may have routed out to herself my father's pension from Science Academy Beijing Headquarter since it has been "stopped in Nanjing local institute because of the fake death claim of my father's", after you heard this Chinese producer has been the major force to produce all these Chinese government's announcements through this radio program to denounce who I am including the announcement that I am not even allowed to step on P.R. China's soil, what would you do after you called laws help?
----January 23rd, 2018
听说了今天早上广播提到的谁是我父亲的“挚爱真情”。
我的回应：我听说我父亲1965年一定要去北京出差的原因是要去见现在广播剧中国制作团队的一个女制作人的母亲，我父亲是在1954-1957年在南京大学念书期间和她妈妈谈过中国式恋爱。
听说这个女制作人从2017年6月左右开始就是中国广播剧制作团队的主要成员。她是于1967年底或者1968年年头出生的，是她母亲的第四个孩子。
她母亲的困扰大概从1959年她母亲大学毕业就开始了。她母亲当时是分配到中科院北京的一个研究所。我父亲1965年吵着要去北京是因为她母亲从我母亲的大姐处把我爷爷的朋友送我母亲的结婚礼物给拿走了。那是一个很贵的手表，我母亲的大姐把我爷爷的朋友送的其他的东西全给扣下了。我母亲是听也没听说过这事。在我已经三，四岁的时候，我母亲才听说她北京的姐姐送她的结婚礼物（缎子被面）被她的大姐给调包了，我母亲只收到了了她大姐给的她大姐自己用过的一个被面。现在，又是这么一个新闻。
她母亲怎么会觉着这么自在就可以把我母亲的结婚礼物给领走了？她母亲可是很清楚她当时已经和她自己丈夫有了三个孩子了。她母亲比我父亲晚一年毕业，她母亲的第一个孩子是在她母亲离开南京两年以后才出生的。我父母是在她母亲去了北京七，八年以后才结的婚，她母亲怎么就这么自在可以在已经过了七，八年之后还把我母亲的结婚礼物给拿走了？
你们还记得那个“头胎女儿”的故事吗？这可能就是为什么她的妈妈就是吵着质问我父亲凭什么只给我买裙子而不给“头胎女儿”买裙子的原因吧。 他们怎么就认定了在这个前女友已经是她自己丈夫三个孩子的母亲的情况下还会如此被我父亲珍惜啊？就算我父亲在这个前女友结婚以前碰过她身子，恐怕也不会这么金贵吧。是这个前女友她自己选择和别的男人结婚的，怎么就认定我父亲会觉着欠了她的似的？
我听说这个做女儿的制作人想法是：要吗她的大哥才是我父亲真正的头胎长子，要么就是如果我父亲是和她的母亲结婚的话，她就是我爷爷们的继承人了。
首先，我听说这个女制作人的大哥是在她母亲结婚以后才怀上的，我父亲是在她母亲决定和别人结婚以后就肯定没碰过她身子。我相信这是可以从卫星影像资料里进行核实的。我父亲在1960年代没有那么多到北京出差的机会。所以，这个女制作人的大哥是我父亲极大不可能的血原关系。
其次，如果这个女制作人的母亲是和我父亲结婚的那一个，根据常识，给她母亲下种的人不同了，生下来的就不知道会是谁了。 既不会是我也不会是她兄妹几个。谈到命运，就冲着这个她母亲根本不懂我父亲的价值，她母亲就没有替我爷爷们生得出女继承人的那个命，懂不懂我父亲的价值可是对那些挚爱着我父亲的我爷爷们来说最重要的事了。如果认为就冲我父亲曾经碰过她母亲的身子可能是事实，就认定我爷爷们及我爷爷们的朋友会选择支持这个女制作人及她的母亲的话，那就是在幻想啦，我爷爷们的朋友很清楚这个前女友不是我父亲的第一个女人。
我母亲当年是嫁了一个家里什么都没有就只有一堆纸箱子的单身汉的事是人人都知道的。我母亲结婚的时候，娘家夫家是什么崭新的结婚礼物都没给，弄得我母亲就好像是我父亲“根本不想要就只是个结个婚而已”似的。哎，我这个女儿啊，可是天天亲眼看着我的父母一起慢慢变老慢慢长大得。我从小到大整天抱怨我父亲的就是我父亲实在是把我妈妈给宠的不像个样子，得由我这个作女儿的经常出面替他纠正，否则我母亲就天天往家里扛她想要的东西，我不纠正我想要的那些东西可就没钱买了（我父亲从来就没有他自己想要的东西）。我就一直抱怨我母亲每到月底就得找我帮忙掩盖她乱花钱甚至能我父亲的钱给花个精光的事实。
就算我母亲和我父亲结婚是否出于对我父亲的爱情让人怀疑，我母亲对于我父亲以及我们这个家的付出可是人所共知的，就冲这，就应该可以想象我母亲才是会被我爷爷们珍惜的儿媳妇。从结婚那天起，我母亲就为这个家全身心地付出着，我母亲永远都是把我和我的父亲想要的看得比她自己重要。我的母亲就像是我和我父亲的保姆一样，全身心的付出完全出自她的心甘情愿，她还完全不知道我父亲的家世背景以及我爷爷们给我的巨额财产信托。要是我的爷爷们还在世的话，我很自信我母亲才是我爷爷们修来的福气，我相信我母亲这个媳妇才是会我爷爷们做梦都会笑醒的美梦成真。
对我爷爷们的朋友们来说，我是我爷爷们的继承人是没有任何疑问的。我才是因为我是我爷爷们的继承人而被我爷爷们的朋友们所支持的一个。就我爷爷们的朋友不会选择支持这个女制作人及她的母亲这点，我不只是很自信而且认为这点是事实存在。我是我父亲的结发妻子所生所育，我永远守护挚爱着我的我自己的母亲。
我为什么要把话说成这样啊？你要是听说了这前女友有可能是我母亲的人事档案在1988年前后被扔出去从此没有了而造成了我母亲成了盲流一般没有了人事身份而痛苦不堪的原因，你要是听说了这前女友有可能是1994年前后我的共青团员档案没有了而造成了南京市药检所就我是否伪造自己共青团员身份而流言蜚语的原因，你要是听说了我父亲的退休工资有可能在“南京当地中科院所被通知我父亲已死亡”而停发后其实是在中科院北京总部被转到这前女友的银行账户里，你要是听说了这个前女友的女儿2017年起所参与制作的这个广播剧以中国政府名义所宣布的包括不准我方敏踏上中华人民共和国领土的一堆申明，除了报警之外，你还会做什么？
----2018年1月23日。
01-22-2018 I am not an Actress and My name is Never a Talented Actress
Heard this morning's broadcasting reflected my long-time scream "I am not an actress".
01-19-2018 About why I am confident my father still alive and why I am hoping my mother still alive (为什么我相信我的父母还活着）
老爸爸，你其实是被我给信托了， 我所信托的财产很安全，你也很安全，请尽快和我联系，或者联系南京紫台，或者和美国上海领事馆联系要求美国公民的紧急联络服务（属美国公民服务），我已经和他们都联系过了，美国上海领事馆也已经打电话和我取得联系，他们有我的有效联系方式。
我的联系方式：Somebodyinma@gmail.com
美国驻上海总领事馆 领区包括：上海、安徽、江苏、浙江。
地址： 上海市南京西路1038号8楼
电话：021-8011-2400 若从美国境内拨打，请拨011-86-21-8011-2400
如此号码出现故障，请拨010-8531 4000。若从美国境内拨打，请拨011-86-10-8531 4000
传真：021-6148-8266
电子邮件：ShanghaiACS@state.gov
网上预约美国公民服务：
https://evisaforms.state.gov/Instructions/ACSSchedulingSystem.asp
以上信息有此网址获得：https://china.usembassy-
Heard this morning's broadcasting about a locked-up who stole a teapot.（中文附后）
My response: This person was arrested on the same day I was told he is safe now.
But I also heard the reason he was arrested when he was cleaning a teapot in his own residence. Some said the teapot was from his own residence, some said was from the neighbor antique store, either case, my father is not the person would clean any teapot, antique or not. He is not the person into antiques or teapot things.
I had asked the United States laws' help about my father's possible missing since I heard the news from Nanjing in 2015. My father was reported "death" by my younger brother since October 4th in 2013, his city registry was deleted and his pension stopped since then. I heard this yesterday after I contacted the place my father retired from. The radio program broadcasted the verified story that my father walked out of the hospital alive was after this day.
I am the British East India Company's Financier lawfully, and I did have made financial providing decision about my parents' health the same as my own on July 1st of 2004. I have received my own health providing since July of 2004 as I decided on my anxiety disorder treatment. If you know somebody in Boston of Massachusetts area, you probably already heard I am very well provided with my health.
I am confident about my father's health, and I hope my mother still alive (I have heard rumors that my mother may still alive from the circumstances of her "death").
I am currently residing in Boston of Massachusetts area on U.S. soil, and I am searching for ways to contact my father, and with laws help, to move him and myself to one of my own properties. I heard this morning's broadcasting expressed this searching effort with no concern for my father's health.
----January 19th, 2018
Heard this morning's broadcasting efforts of warning my father don't ever contact U.S Consulate in Shanghai, Beijing or Guangzhou area.
My response: That is intended to be a joke. I used O's confusion to describe my problem with Tina O'Connor and some of her O'Connor cousins in New York City area, the "cousins" in this morning's broadcasting may last named O'F, O'N, OZ, etc. who are not even biologically associated with any O'Connor. Plus only O'Connors from the first Senator's line, in 6th or 7th cousin with Tina O'Connor, about 150 households totaled 200 any O'Connor, that have been on the list of agreed-upon providing may have shared and still sharing Tina O'Connor's confusion about "the deserved ownership" of the fund which is the American child Fund of the British East India Financer Fund that I lawfully own.
----January 19th, 2018
Heard this morning's broadcasting of my younger brother's wife's child.
My response: I heard this morning's broadcasting is about a boy, my younger brother told me his registered wife mother a girl.
I heard that boy is fathered by a relative of Fang, Zhiqiang(方志强) who was once featured on the radio program as unlikely a possible heir from Zu's family.
Fang, Zhiqiang(方志强) has no blood association with my father at all. I heard rumors that the DNA test result is about 70% which means unlikely that boy is my brother's or any of my father's cousin's child.
----January 19th, 2018
听说了今天早上的播出提到一个因偷茶壶而被抓的人。
我的回应：听说那人是在我听说我父亲已经安全的同一天被抓的。
但我也听说了他被抓时是在他自己的住处清理一个茶壶。有人说那茶壶是他自己房子里的的，有人说是他从隔壁的古董店里偷得，哪种情况都不大可能是我的父亲，古董也好，不是古董也好，我父亲就不是一个会花心思清理茶壶的人。他对茶壶古董之类的从来没什么兴趣。
我是在2015年听说我父亲在中国被报告已”死亡“后就已经立即在美国报警并提供给了警方我有巨额财产继承的线索。我昨天联系了我父亲退休前工作的单位，是我弟弟告知他们我父亲于2013年10月4日“死亡”。我父亲的退休金和城市户籍登记都在那一天算作“死亡”。广播剧所报道的已证实我父亲是活着走出医院的报道讲的就是在这一天（2013年10月4日）之后的事情。
我是英国东印度公司投资基金的合法主人，我在2004年7月1日就我父母健康照顾的决定是他们和我自己是同一个规格。我自己是从2004年7月就已经收到我自己的健康照顾供给所提供的恐慌症治疗的远程心理健康治疗。如果你有朋友在美国麻州的波士顿地区，你可能已经听说了我的健康供给好得很。
我很自信我父亲有和我以同样方式收到他的健康照顾供给，我也很希望我母亲还活着（我是听说了一些我母亲去世前后的情形可能表明我母亲还活着）。
我目前生活在美国领土上的麻州波士顿地区，我是在寻找和我父亲取得联系的方式，在法律的协助下，希望让我父亲和我可以搬进我自己拥有的房产里。我听说了今天早上的广播表达了这份对我父亲健康一点都没担心只是在帮助我和我父亲取得联络方式的努力。
----2018年1月19日。
听说了今天早上的广播那份“警告”我父亲永远别联系美国驻华的上海，北京及广州领事馆的努力。
我的回应：那是想作为一个笑话的播出的。我在我的博客上用了"O的困扰"来形容我和一个Tina O'Connor的矛盾以及我和她的一些在纽约的娘家亲戚的矛盾，今天早上播出的“亲戚”其实就是一些姓氏是以O起头的，像O'N, O'F, OZ 等等，但其实他们和O'Connor家族并没有什么血原关系。再加上姓O'Connor的，也就只有第一代参议员的后裔，也就是在那些在同意供给名单上，也就是和Tina O‘Connor是七等亲或八等亲以内的，（一共是150多户，200个姓O'Connor的) 是和Tina O'Connor有着同样的“谁才够资格拥有"我所合法拥有的英国东印度公司投资基金公司的一个美国子基金公司。
----2018年1月19日。
听说了今天早上提到的我弟弟妻子的小孩。
我的回应：我听我弟弟说他的婚姻注册登记妻子生的是个女儿，而今天早上讲的是个男孩。
我听说那个男孩是方志强的一个亲戚的，方志强就是广播剧之前有播出过的那个不太可能是明朝朱家继承人的那个。
方志强和我父亲一点亲戚血原关系都没有，我听说那个男孩的DNA鉴定结果是70%左右，也就是说不太可能是我弟弟的小孩，也不太可能是我父亲的什么亲戚的小孩。
----2018年1月19日。
08-18-2018
Heard this morning's talk about some Fund.
My response: I heard it is broadcasted that ownership by Laws.
----January 18th, 2018
Heard this morning's broadcasting mentioned the radio program is like a crazy bus freaking out everybody.
My response: Ya, I have been the one "on the bus" who just can't stop screaming.
----January 18th, 2018
Heard this morning's broadcasting of frustrated expression,
My response: I agree it is a real frustration. I agree it is not ridiculous at all to have this frustration. It would be hard for me to say anything if the frustration is to better by a specific request or requests, I think as long as seeking is a wide spectrum range of opportunities and it is a fair equal employment opportunity, I think it is an appropriate expression from the person who expressed this frustration.
I was asked if this would be my tone to everyone who came from China, I say Nope. It is not my obligation or responsibility to offer any employment opportunity just because I came from China as well. As far as I know, this is the same understanding in any investment inside China and/or abroad that is owned by anyone who is also from China. In the United States, same equal employment opportunity is by Laws.
----January 18th, 2018
P/S A very good news: Critical treatment is averaged 1 hour or so now. Same rate and same deposit.
01-17-2018 What is he doing? and I am good
Heard this morning's broadcasting of announcements from the heir of Zu's Family.
My response: I heard he works for Chinese Justice Department that is equivalent to FBI. Why would he make such announcement to make Zu's family similar to public impressions about Italian Don's family in movies （电影里的意大利黑手党)?
Plus, he needs to apply for a passport from the People's Republic of China if he travels abroad, why would he make such announcement to impressively to promote himself as if above?
He is a couple of years younger than me. I am rolling my eyes.
----January 17th, 2018
Heard this morning's broadcasting of remote surgical infertile technology.
My response: As everybody reading this blog would already know that I will be fine. Has anyone ever wondered what this means? Let me explain a bit.
1: I am well protected.
Reason: The United States has the technology to protect. As far as I know, this technology has the auto-response mechanism and has the capacity to handle a good-sized population on the U.S. soil.
2: I am financial very well to afford it.
Reason: I do have my own money.
3: How expensive for the public to afford it?
Answer: Since it is an existing technology that is automatic with good sized capacity, so it is imaginable won't be very expensive. Exactly how affordable, or who should be covered by this technology's protection, I have no idea.
Of course, there are the human head, the human heart, human..., and human reproduction organs, etc. to make us human alive, which organ is less important? But no panic, full body protection technology already exists.
----January 17th, 2018
01-16-2018 Sexually supported by the Chinese Government made the Voice Loud and What is the family wealth referred to at this morning?（中文附后）
Heard this morning's talk about my uncle's "death penalty equivalent" privilege（中文附后）.
My response: I only need to express my true reaction "unlikely that is to remove any barriers to pave the way for me."
The rumor is when my younger brother was enjoying his "radio marriage" sexually, his legally registered wife has the support from the Chinese government offered in sexual relationship format by Chinese Premier Li at her maiden hometown area. The rumored sexual relationship was open-door, curtain-down experience. This is the style fits rumors of how the Taiwanese Miss Li got conceived to mother Chinese Premier Li's sons in front of his secret service agents'(警卫员) widely opened eyes.
What I heard the reason for this style is that this is the only way to be convincing that he mated the female sexually. She has eyewitnesses offered by the Chinese Premier Li and her own recorded tapes. I heard the Taiwanese do have very hard time to convince the People's Republic of China's government that she is the birth mother of the Chinese Premier Li's birth sons. Heard there are still some arguments how could possibly she mothers his children.
You did hear my younger brother's wife is the voice that is supported by the People's Republic of China's government on my father's welfare on the other day's radio broadcasting.
It is rumored that the other female who participated "radio marriage" has the same support from the Chinese government offered by the same person in same having eye-witnesses way. And you did hear her voice loud and loud on the radio earlier, right? But, but there are also rumors she father the same person's office staff's some relative's child is the reason.
I say to my uncle, I know you only have one child(a son) and if you are willing to let you daughter-in-laws to be supported, unlikely you can keep your own house you bought by your own savings. I am still searching for your elder brother. Now, he got "death penalty equivalent" privileged because of against, do you say which one he should choose, support to be kicked out from his own home, or this?
I am a female, but I already have everything and supported by Laws and those who are my grandfathers' entrusting groups, as well as my own entrusting groups. And I refuse to have any Chinese government's support offered in such disgusting way.
I do believe that "radio marriage" is Chinese Government to pay for allowing this to happen on the People's Republic of China's soil. How actresses need to have sexes with my younger brother and mother another married person's child, if all those rumors are true, can be categorized into practicing performing arts? I refuse to pay their compensation or their practicing performing arts fees.
----January 16th, 2018
Heard this morning's argument of splitting my family's wealth has to be fair equally.
My response: My father went missing currently, and my father is well-known has not inherited anything. All my father has are his apartment he was kicked out from together with his life savings robbed. My father has been lived on his monthly-paid pension ever since the day he was kicked out from his own home.
My grandfather, who father my father, died in 1965, splitting of my grandfather's wealth happened in 1965 by my own grandfather's arrangements.
My great-grandfather, who fathered my grandfather, died in 1930, the splitting of my great-grandfather's wealth happened in 1930 by my great-grandfather's own arrangements. My great-grandfather died of over-night sudden death and all his children were birth-mothered by my great-grandmother.
.............
Exact, which family wealth that is referred to as my family wealth in this morning's broadcasting that needs to be split fair equally?
What I received is what my grandfathers specially allocated for me being an heir girl, what I received is my wealth, my wealth got nothing to do with any of my grandfathers' any other children including their heir sons that includes my father Fang, Wenhai.
I refuse any request to split my any marriage partner's family any wealth as well as my own wealth.
----January 16th, 2018
听说了今天早上的广播提到了我叔叔“就是死刑犯的同等待遇“。
我的回应：我只需要表达我听说时的真实反应就可以：“应该不会是在替我扫清障碍。”
海外传言是： 当我弟弟在享受“广播剧婚姻”的性爱关系时，我弟弟的婚姻注册妻子也在享受着由中国总理李克强以性交媾所表达的中国政府所提供的支持，据说性交媾是拉上窗帘但房门打开方式，就在女方的娘家居住地附近。这倒是很符合前几年海外所传台湾李姓小姐就是这样在中国总理李克强的两个警卫员的圆睁大眼的密切紧盯之下被李克强总理公开下种而孕育了李克强总理的两个亲生小孩。
我听说这种性交方式是唯一可以向别人证实他确实有和女方发生性交关系的方式。那台湾女人是有由男方提供的警卫员做为人证及她自己录制的性交影带做为物证。就这样，我是有听说那台湾女人可是花了好大的力气向中国政府证明她自己确实是中国总理李克强亲生孩子的亲生母亲， 听说就她是否是男方亲生孩子的亲生母亲，现在还是备受争议。
在前几天的广播剧上，听众应该听得很清楚，是我弟弟婚姻注册的妻子在就我父亲的福祉问题上，是由中国政府的强力支持着，才有那一股就是她才够资格，就是她说了就算的气势。
听说了另外一个参与“广播剧婚姻”的女性，听说也受到了同样由同一个人提供的，同样有人证在场方式所表达的支持。你也是在广播剧上听到她的声音是响亮又响亮， 是吧？不过也听说了她是男方的办公室工作人员的亲戚的孩儿妈是原因。
我就想对我叔叔说，我很清楚你就只有一个小孩, 是个儿子，你要是愿意让你的儿媳妇也被中国政府用同样方式支持支持，你自己积蓄买下的房子恐怕就很难保住咯。我现在可是还在四处找你的大哥呢。瞧瞧，中国政府要么支持就是支持他被赶出自己的家门，要吗反对就成了让他有“死刑犯同等待遇”。你说我叔叔他应该是选择被中国政府的支持还是被中国政府反对啊？
我自己倒是一个女性，但我已经有了一切，我也有法律的支持及受我爷爷们诚信托付的那些人的支持，以及受我自己诚信托付财产的那些人的支持。我拒绝被中国政府用这么一种恶心的方式提供支持。
我相信中国政府才是应该是赔偿因”广播剧婚姻”而提出的所有赔偿要求的一方，原因就是中国政府居然让这种事情在中国的领土上发生。如果海外传言是真，哪有可能一个演员就只是演戏而已就和我弟弟发生真实性交配，然后再和另一个已婚男人真实生个小孩出来？我拒绝支付所有的赔偿要求及所有所谓参与演出的费用。
----2018年1月16日。
听说了今天早上的广播所表达的应该公平平等的分我家财产。
我的回应：我父亲现在是失踪，而且我父亲是人所共知的没有发生任何财产继承的一个。我父亲所有的全部就是他自己买的那一套房子以及他被从那房子里赶出去时没能带出来的全部积蓄。我父亲从被从自己家里赶出来的那一天起，就是靠他那每个月发放的退休金生活着。
我的祖父，也就是我父亲的父亲，是于1965年去世的，我爷爷家分家产是在1965年由我爷爷自己处理的。
我的曾祖父，就是我爷爷的父亲，是于1930年去世的，我曾祖父家分家产是在1930年由我曾祖父自己处理的。我曾祖父是在得暴疾的第二天才去世的，我曾祖父所有的孩子也都是我曾祖母亲生的。
。。。。。
请问一下，究竟今天早上提到的这公平平等的分我家的家产，是想分我的什么家的家产？
我收到的都是我爷爷们因为我是一个女继承人而另外给我的，我收到的是我的财产，我的财产和我爷爷们的其他孩子们一点关系都没有，也和我爷爷们的继承人儿子们（包括我父亲方文海）一点关系都没有。
我拒绝任何想要分我的任何一个婚姻伴侣家产的任何企图及要求，我也拒绝想要分我自己财产的任何企图及要求。
----2018年1月16日。
01-15-2018 Should A Public Media's big Investor "Pay to be shited even name harm is the only intention?" 这届中国政府根本就是篡党夺权的政府
Should A Public Media's big Investor "Pay to be shited even name harm is the only intention?". (中文附后）
My response: I refuse to pay to let this “cousin” tell everyone she is the person actually "having attorneys" and capable of "resolving issues".
I did hear this “pay to be shited" was organized by Albert Gore. And I refuse to pay to be shited from those who shit out of hatred.
I never hired no-attorney-licensed Albert Gore to represent my any lawful interest or any lawful rights. I refuse Albert Gore's public robbery attempted that aimed at my own financial power over my own money.
It was well-known I publicly rejected Albert Gore to be supported by my financial power over my own inheritances on July 1st of 2004, I have called Law enforcement's help on the money including my handsome intellectual making that he has stolen from me as well as this organized public robbery of my own power over my own finance.
I am constantly threatened that if I refuse to pay to be shited like you have heard on the radio, then I should not be allowed to be a big investor to own a public media, so what is the difference between "abusively use public media to commit a crime of public name harm" and public media's fair reporting or probing into issues related to public interests that maybe not correct?
----January 15th, 2018
Heard this morning's broadcasting of Chinese government's announcement of the investigation.
My response: I was like "how? They are the beneficiary group of all these announcements to promote activities, what needs to be investigated when it comes to the rumors that they are not promoted by former Chinese administration, but promoted by a female they have shared sexual relationship with since youth time, and by that female's publicly announced their "deserved fast promotion" on the radio program with her another sexual partner's (Albert Gore) support, and promoted her announcement without former Chinese administration's authorization?"
How could I possibly expect the National Leader who committed a crime according to Chinese Criminal Laws by pushing my father out of a moving car and drove off while my father still on the ground could possibly organize any lawful investigation?
How could I possibly believe this National Leader, that obviously well-supported by current administration of the People's Republic of China's government, can do a fair investigation, when what I heard is he invited my father to push my father out of a moving car in order to support my younger brother's wife to kick out my father from his own home that he bought by his own saving and his long years' employment he had worked for the Chinese Purple Mountain Observatory he bought this apartment from? I heard it was the same day (or the third day) that my father got up from the ground, he was ousted from his own home.
My father was a Chinese citizen, at least at the moment he was pushed out of a moving car. How could possibly that can be a lawfully elected Chinese national leader that dare to publicly commit such a Chinese Criminal Laws' defined crime？
I believe all these because of my own experiences living in the United States. I only met this Chinese Premiere Li once in 1991 and moved to the United States in 1996. Entire Chinese government administration, former and current, are all aware I never contacted him other than a faxed letter in January of 2015, addressed to Chinese Consulate New York because of the radio program's featured stories of his romances ,that informed him I was looking for information of my inherited wealth which did not even include a single tiny request that implied the intention of asking his help.
He broadcasted his "romance stories" on the radio after he fathers a Taiwanese woman's children, and he insisted on change my wealth ownership to his lawfully registered wife. By intentionally using the confusion of who is his wife and who mothers his child(children), he insisted on to own my wealth and insisted on to abusing my hard earned fame as if I want to stuck-on him, and actually his desire of own my wealth is the real reason of all his "practicing of this kind performing arts".。
I think it is possible that Chinese Premier Li, Keqiang(Kejiang， 李克强) and his partner Chinese Chairman Xi, Jinping(习近平）and this administration of People's Republic of China's government is illegally formed because they completely ignore the fact that the people's Republic of China is not privately owned by their beloved shared female but by all People's Republic of China's citizens.
I think it is possible that Chinese Premier Li, Keqiang(Kejiang， 李克强) and his partner Chinese Chairman Xi, Jinping(习近平）and this administration of People's Republic of China's government is illegally formed because they are possibly not promoted by the former administration of the People's Republic of China's government who is a group of people believes in China is a Lawful Country and Chinese People are industrious and brave( 勤劳勇敢).
I think it is possible that Chinese Premier Li, Keqiang(Kejiang， 李克强) and his partner Chinese Chairman Xi, Jinping(习近平）and this administration of People's Republic of China's government is illegally formed because no lawfully formed government would violate own laws to create any situation for personal gains in finance or in power. Not to mention live on other people's money and demand to be provided for without money owner's willingness by abusively using a Nation's government's powers and human & capital resources.
----January 15th, 2018
Heard some concern what will happen to my father after I publicly speak up?
My response: It can only be better. China that I came from is the People's Republic of China, not a privately owned whorehouse China substitution.
Everyone who ever heard me talking knows I never criticize Chinese government's any internal or foreign policy before Dec. of 2014, and violent swore about the notorious Chinese Premier L, Keqiang(Kejiang，中国国家总理李克强）and his romantic relationship.
My silence about I only met this Chinese Premiere Li, Keqiang did not help ease the situation that my inherited wealth kept being demanded by his lawfully registered wife but severed it because the reason to own my wealth is"That is his wife's inherited money and/or lawfully earned money and I am his lawfully registered wife Chenghong(程虹), why can't I use that money".
And my swearing about this Chinese Premiere Li, Keqiang（Kejiang，中国国家总理李克强） did help to clarification who his wife is worldwide, but severe the demanding to own my wealth by Chinese government official participation of this public rob my money through radio program's "announce intended ownership on the radio program without any lawful authorization and insist on changing the ownership according to the radio announcements to to really own what announced in reality by promoting the radio program as practicing some performing arts" scheme in 2015.
This substituting scheme that through practicing performing arts to change "owns the money by Laws" to "owns the money by owns a money-irrelevant male's sex" is the reason I say the organizer of this practicing this kind of performing arts is the "usurp party and state power group (篡党夺权团伙)"
My personal eperiences how I need to regain my own financial power over my own money including how I need to regain my lawful power to spend my own money as I wish, and my personal experiences that part of my fights to regain my own financial power over my own money have been against this administration of the People's Reublic of China's government that led by the Chinese Premiere Li, Keqiang （Kejiang， 中国国家总理李克强）and Chinese Chairman Xi, Jinping(中国国家主席习近平） is the reason I would think this administration of the People's Repubic of China's government must be a "usurp party and state power group (篡党夺权团伙)". The difference is just it is a different kind of powers, and that is all.
----January 15th, 2018
一个公共媒体的大投资人就是”就算破坏名誉是唯一目的，也应该付钱被别人骂吗？”
我的回应：我拒绝付钱让这个“亲戚”公告天下说她自己才是“请的起律师的”，才是有能力“处理问题的”一个。
我是有听说这种“付钱被人骂”是阿尔伯特·高尔组织的。我拒绝让任何人出于仇恨对我谩骂，更不用说付钱让他们这么做。
我从未雇佣现在已没有律师执照的阿尔伯特·高尔来代表我的任何法律权利和利益。我拒绝阿尔伯特·高尔企图公然篡夺我对自己私人合法财产的合法支配权的任何努力。
2004年的时候很多人就已经听说了我当众拒绝了用我对我所继承财产的支配权来支持阿尔伯特·高尔。我已经就我自己的钱财包括我的智慧产权收入被阿尔伯特·高尔通过广播剧公然掠夺，以及公然篡夺我对我合法拥有财产的合法支配权的所有违法行为报警处理了。
我经常被人威胁说要是我不肯花钱被人骂，也就是花钱被骂到惨不忍睹的就像你们在广播剧里听到的一样，我就不可能做一个公共媒体的大股东，那我想问的就是：媒体就某一事件的报道或对影响公众利益事件原因的探寻，因为对事件理解有误所造成的报道偏差和公然破坏名誉为唯一目的所进行的造谣诽谤公然羞辱之间的的区别是什么？
----2018年1月15日。
听说了今天早上的广播提到了中国政府要进行调查的宣布。
我的回应：我的反应就是“他们查？怎么查法啊？他们自己可能就是因为整个事件而获得利益的团体。 按照海外传言，他们自己就不是由中国的前一届政府推荐选拔提升的，而是由和他们自己都有两性关系的同一个女人，及通过这同一个女人的有两性关系的外国人（阿尔伯特·高尔）通过广播剧在全世界公开宣布他们就是应该被快速提拔的人才，再通过有组织的推广这个广播剧的宣布就是有效宣布等等一系列的活动，在未经前一届中国政府的授权下就通过广播剧在现实生活里在事实上被提拔了。碰到这种传言，他们自己再在同一个广播剧上宣布由他们自己查？怎么查啊？
我怎么会认为一个拖着我的父亲上了他的小轿车，再把我父亲从已启动的车里给推出去，看我父亲摔倒在地, 没等我父亲能够站起来，就轻轻松松扬长而去的这么一个人，一个明显已经违反了中华人民共和国刑事法法律的犯罪分子，却还继续可以当中华人民共和国的国家领导人的这么一个人，会有可能组织一个符合中华人民共和国法律的事件真相调查？
我那有可能会相信这样一个国家领导人，一个还明显被这一届中国政府鼎力支持的这么一个人，做所有这一切就是为了协助我弟弟的妻子把我父亲给赶出我父亲自己出钱买的天文台的职工宿舍的家门的这么一个人，会有可能做任何公平的调查啊？我听说的是：我父亲就是在南京的北京东路上，就是在大白天，就是在天文台宿舍大院的前面被公然推出已经启动的汽车而当众摔倒在地的，就在我父亲好不容易从地上站起来回到家里的同一天（或者第三天），就收到他儿子的老婆递上的装着我父亲身份证件的小塑料袋并被告知永远别回来了。我2015年一月打电话回家时, 我被那女的告知的是我父亲已经走了。
我父亲当时，至少是在他被推出已经启动的汽车那一刻，是一个中华人民共和国的公民，那有可能一个经过合法选举产生的国家领导人会如此胆大，会有可能在公然违反了中华人民共和国的刑事法法律，犯下刑事罪行却还可以继续做一个中华人民共和国的国家领导人的?
我相信所有这些传言，就是因为我自己在美国生活的亲身经历。我只在1991年见过这个中国李姓总理一次，然后于1996年移居美国。整个中国政府，前一届的和这一届的，都很清楚我从未联系过他，就只是在2015年一月因为广播剧播出的一些故事，给中国纽约总领事馆发过一个电传，告知我正在寻找我所继承的究竟是些什么，那封信里连暗示要求他帮助的意思都没有。（我所继承的钱在美国，我人也在美国，2004年我能在完全不知情的情况下在美国继承财产，我哪里会需要远在中国的任何人帮我找钱啊？）
他是在已经做了一个台湾女人的孩子父亲之后，才在广播剧里播出他的所谓爱情故事，他就是坚持要把我的财产的所有权变成他法律上登记的妻子所有。通过故意混淆谁是他的妻子及谁是他孩子的母亲，他就是坚持要拥有我的财富还公然破坏我的名誉好像是我在死缠着他，其实他想要拥有我的财产才是所有这些中华人民共和国所组织的演出的目的。
我会认为中国总理李克强和中国国家主席习近平所组成的这一届政府有可能是非法组成的政府就是因为他们完全罔顾中国人民共和国是所有中国公民所拥有的，而不是他们共同的心爱女人自己私家拥有的。
我会认为中国总理李克强和中国国家主席习近平所组成的这一届政府有可能是非法组成的政府就是因为他们可能不是由中国的前一届政府推荐选举产生的，因为中国的前一届政府是相信中国是一个法制的国家的政府，是相信中国人民是勤劳勇敢自己挣钱花的政府。
我会认为中国总理李克强和中国国家主席习近平所组成的这一届政府有可能是非法组成的政府就是因为哪有任何一个合法的政府组要通过破坏法律来做一个局，哪里会需要通过做这个局，那个局来得到权力和钱财。更不用说就是一定要让别人掏钱养着，还用一个国家的政府权利及人力物力就是一定要让别人就算不愿意也得拿钱出来？
----2018年1月15日。
听说了一些担心如果我如此之言，那我父亲怎么办？
我的回应：只会好。我所来自的中国人民共和国从来不是什么已经被私家娼妓院替代了的一个中国。
每一个听到过我说话的都知道在2014年12月之前我从未就中国政府的任何对内对外政策发表任何评论，但2015年一月以后我就开始了痛骂中国国家总理李克强以及他的私人生活。
我对于我只见过这个中国总理一面的沉默没能让他的法律上登记结婚的妻子停止向我要钱而是加剧，因为要拥有我的财产的理由是”那是他妻子的钱，而我（程虹）才是他法律登记结婚并有实际上的两性关系的合法妻子，我（程虹）为什么就是不能拥有这些钱？"
而我对于这个中国总理李克强的谩骂虽然向全世界澄清了谁才是他的妻子，但是因为中国政府的正式于2015年参与这个”通过广播剧不经授权的宣布就必须在现实中实际拥有”这么一个伎俩而加剧了这份要挟恐吓要求拥有我所继承财产的压力。
这种通过进行所谓的表演，把”根据法律合法拥有某个财产“的说法替换成“根据与某个男性的性交关系而必须拥有非该男性所拥有的，被其他人所合法拥有的某个财产”的伎俩是我说组织这些演出的根本就是一群篡党夺权团伙的原因。
我自己的亲生经历，那一份需要经历一番苦战才能让我自己合法的钱归我自己合法花的过程，那一份需要经历一份艰难才能夺回我对我自己合法财产的合法控制权的过程，而我自己的这份亲身经历以及我捍卫自己合法权利的一份苦战有一部分是在与中国总理李克强及中国国家主席习近平所领导的中国政府在苦战，是造成我会认为这一届中国政府根本是篡党夺权团伙的原因。区别也就只是不同的权利而已。
----2018年一月15日。
Chronicle Note
**I have not heard one single episode of this radio program myself for a lot of reasons. To do a radio program majorly featuring me was discussed on 07/01/2004 conference call. The radio program has been produced by United States 106.7FM or Clear Channel and on air since 2005??suppose??. I am a Chinese, the major featured person(suppose). Following are what I gathered from impacts of being the major featured person and may not correct. Please contact me at somebodyinMA@gmail.com if the content is seriously incorrect and please provide references including broadcasting channel and time, thanks forward.
老爸爸方文海，你其实是被我给信托了， 我所信托的财产很安全，你也很安全，请尽快和我联系，或者联系南京紫台025-8333-2227，请赶紧和美国领事馆联系(任何地方的美领馆， 上海021-8011-2400），不用担心你是否有有效证件证明身份，他们可以做DNA鉴定来确定你和我的亲生父女关系的。如果老爸爸你因为自己的亲身经历，想在国内找找妈妈王博贤的消息，也最好是在和美国领事馆核实妈妈是否已经在美国之后，或者至少和我方敏取得联系之后，再一起商量商量如何找妈妈并和妈妈取得联系。紫金山天文台http://www.pmo.cas.cn/ztjj/lxfs/
你也可以查一下你是否有如下医院的医疗保险：上海国际医院名单， 索引文章)
03-28-2017 Cheung Kong Holdings is not Hong Kong Chung(长江实业不是香港长实）
Heard this morning's anger of Hong Kong Chung.
My response: My sincere apology. The company my Hong Kong trust has been investing is the parent company of Cheung Kong Holdings(长江实业）, not the Hong Kong Chung（长实公司). The $500 Million check that lady account payable specialist signed in 2004 was from Cheung Kong Holdings(长江实业).
Cheung Kong Holdings is now a restructured public trading company has a new name Cheung Kong Group.
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cheung_Kong_Holdings )
I used abbreviated Chinese name's(长实） English translation caused this confusion. So sorry I have not visited Hong Kong yet.
The Hong Kong Trust was set up by Zhiren Fang(方智仁). I am the sole beneficiary person "Female Palm" of this Hong Kong trust according to Zhiren Fang's(方智仁) will.
----March 28th, 2018
听说了今天早上有关香港长实的愤怒。
我的回应：很抱歉。我的香港信托所投资的公司是香港长江实业的母公司，不是长实公司。那个付款账簿女士于2004年开具的5亿美金是香港长江实业的支票。
香港长江实业于2015年已重组成长江集团。
( https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E9%95%B7%E6%B1%9F%E5%AF%A6%E6%A5%AD )
困扰是因为我是用了其中文简写（长实）做的英文翻译造成的。很不好意思我还没去过香港。
该香港信托由方智仁设立。按照方智仁遗嘱，我是该香港信托唯一受益人“女掌”。
----2018年3月28日。
03-26-2018 All about that $500 Million ---- Cheung Kong Holdings(长江实业) never did money laundry （都是有关五亿美金的--长江实业从未涉入任何洗钱行为）
Heard this morning's talk about HongKong's $500 Million.（中文附后）
My response: I heard the accountant wrote the check from Hong Kong Cheung (香港长实) company's operating account instead of my Hongkong Trust's capital account in the company caused money laundry confusion.
That is the reason there were arguments you heard on the radio about the money should be from the piles after-registry-closed. The piles after-registry-closed mean the money is the profiting from the business operation.
Operating account means the money in business operation which is the money in the registry. Capital account means the investor's profiting share which is the piles after-registry-closed.
So, what the accountant stated this morning was that she had signed that $500Million check upon my Hong Kong Trust's request from the registry instead of the piles after-registry-closed.
I assume she must have expected that would be a very high return investment opportunity to miss for the company. Well, you heard the argument from Mr. Walton to clarify that is the unlikely situation. And the legal documentation prepared by my Hong Kong Trust made a verify appropriate specification which was "to invest this $500 Million at an average yield".
I heard this $500Million had been adjusted to the capital account is the reason Mr. Walton cannot return this money back to the company. *The $500Million was owned lawfully by my Hong Kong Trust in its capital account after the accounting adjustment and transferred to the United States afterward, this $500Million should be given to me as the transferring legal documentation specified.
Conclusion: Cheung Kong Holdings (长江实业) never did money laundry.
The reason I requested this $500Million from my Hong Kong Trust to the United States was that all the hostilities I felt regarding how I did my inheriting day shopping spree. I did not know that shopping spree was either understood "the female butts money I was demanding" or understood "the female butts money I was given". But I felt the pressure of pushing me to reveal the account numbers with the saving amount to prove that I do have some money, and I wanted to gift some to my father-side relatives as part of my inheriting shopping spree, so I asked Hong Kong Trust to transfer some money to the United States to invest that everyone know I do have the money I inherited and that is it. And I told my father-side relatives I would gift them ￥500Million RMB when I go home.
I had no intention to reveal my private savings in any way, that includes this Hong Kong Trust. But the pressure I felt was from the China community or the Chinese government was the reason I requested this money to be transferred from the Chinese run Hong Kong Trust.
I heard in that legal documentation accompanied with the $500 Million transfer from Hong Kong, it is specified that Mr. Walton should give the $500 Million with the investment return to me. And that is the legal issue that I have with Mr. Walton after he announced his giving of $700 Million to Albert Gore on the radio.
I have to clarify that Mr. Walton does have a lot of his own money to spend, but Mr. Walton is not the authorized and/or privileged person to spend my money.
I heard rumors that my father-side relatives only willing to let Albert Gore or his representative(s) handle my gift-giving related matter. Well, if this rumor* is true, I would need legal documentation of their willingness, and I understand that is their free wishes to reject my gifting.
On July 1st of 2004 when that money-pool was announced, I made myself very clear that I would not take any money from the money-pool of other people's donation-deposit and I would not put a penny (or more) into that money-pool as well. I have called laws help on legal issues related to this money-pool.
Albert Gore was never the authorized and/or privileged person to receive money on my behave.
Albert Gore is not the authorized and/or privileged person to receive money on my behave.
Albert Gore will never be the authorized and/or privileged person to receive money on my behave.
* The rumor I heard is Mr. Walton would not give me that $500Million with its investment return, Albert Gore willing give $400Million to my father-side relatives from the $700Million he had received from Mr. Walton on the same day Mr. Walton announced on the radio. So, he can keep a $300Million. I reject this unauthorized arrangement of my money of the $500Million transferred from Hong Kong together with its investment return. I called law enforcement's help.
----March 26th, 2018
听说了今天早上提到的香港那五亿美金。
我的回应：我听说会计开5亿美金支票的账户是公司的营运账户而不是公司的股东账户是造成香港长实公司是否有涉及洗钱传言的原因。
这也是为什么你们听到了“那钱应该是从银箱锁了以后的那一堆钱里拿出来”的争执。银箱锁了结账以后的那一堆钱指的就是公司营运的利润。
公司营运账户指的是公司做生意所使用的账户也就是收银员的收银箱。公司的股东账户就是公司投资人的利润分成也就是收银员锁了收银箱结账以后要交给老板的钱。
所以，那个会计今天早上所陈述的就是她是从收银员的收银箱里拿的那五亿美金，而不是从收银箱锁了结账以后要交给老板的那一堆里拿的。
我估计那个会计师肯定是以为那是个好的不得了的投资机会应该要让公司来赚这笔投资利得的钱。可惜你们听到沃顿先生澄清这是不太可能的。而且我的香港信托所准备的五亿美金转账所需的法律文件上也只是非常恰当的标明了“用这五亿美金进行平均利得的投资”。
结论：长江实业从未涉入任何洗钱行为。
我听说这五亿美金已经被调整成了股东账户的支出是沃顿先生不能把钱退回公司的原因。*经过账目调整之后，这五亿美金是转入了我的香港信托所合法拥有的香港长实公司的上级总公司里的公司股东账户并从这个账户里转账美国的，这个五亿美金应该按照当时转账所附的法律文件的规定交付我使用。
我提出要我的香港信托转账五亿美金到美国的原因就是因为我感受到对我那天大把花钱的敌意。我当时还不知道我做我的“继承了大血拼”是被理解成了“我在要女人的屁股钱”或者是“有钱男人在发放女人的屁股钱”。但我能感觉到要搜了我的银行来查我的银行账号和存款来看我到底有没有钱有多少钱的那份压力，而我本人也想给乘着我正好是在做“继承了大买东西”，就顺便送我父亲那边的几个亲戚一些礼物，所以我就让我的香港信托转账五亿美金到美国以示我确实有钱，我有已经继承了的财产，对我花钱的敌意应该到此为止。我还告诉了我父亲方面的那几个亲戚，等我回家的时候我会送给他们每家五亿人民币。*转账五亿美金的法律文件上所注明的投资时间已结束。
我没有任何意愿公布我的私人财务情况以及这家香港信托的财务。但当时那份到来自华裔社区或者中国政府的莫名压力是我要求从华人经营的这家香港信托转账钱财的原因。
我听说在这五亿美金转账时所附的法律文件里有明确指明沃顿先生应该把这五亿美金以及投资利得都交付我方敏。沃顿先生在广播上擅自宣布他已交付给阿尔贝特·高尔其中的七亿美金引发我和沃顿先生之间的法律纠纷。
我必须澄清沃顿先生自己确实有很多钱，但很遗憾沃顿先生不是一个得到授权或者是有特权可以花我的钱的人。
我听说有传言我父亲那边的几个亲戚表态只愿意由阿尔贝特·高尔或者阿尔贝特·高尔的代表处理我送礼物给他们的事宜。如果是这样的话，我要求他们出示表达他们明确意愿的法律文件，我认为他们这是在表达他们拒绝我的礼物的自由意愿。
在2004年7月1日宣布那个蓄钱池的时候，我就已经明确表态我不会从这个蓄钱池里拿别人捐得一分钱，也不会往这个蓄钱池里放一分（或更多) 钱。我已经就我的一些智慧产权收入被存入这个蓄钱池里被瓜分的传言报警处理。
阿尔贝特·高尔过去从来不是一个得到授权或者是有特权可以替我接受钱财的人。
阿尔贝特·高尔现在不是一个得到授权或者是有特权可以替我接受钱财的人。
阿尔贝特·高尔永远不会是一个得到授权或者是有特权可以替我接受钱财的人。
*我听到的传言是沃顿先生是不会按照转账所附的法律文件所规定的将五亿美金及利得交付我方敏。阿尔贝特·高尔愿意从他已经在沃顿先生宣布当天就收到的其中的七亿美金里支付我父亲方面的那几个亲戚共四亿美金。也就是他自己留下那三亿美金。我拒绝这种未经授权擅自处理我的香港信托所转出的5亿美金及其利得的做法。已报警处理。
----2018年3月26日。
03-25-2018 Hong Kong is not money laundry and Where is the comfortableness come from? ( 香港从来没有洗过钱以及哪来的这份理所应当啊？）
Heard confusion about Hongkong's $500 Million(中文附后）.
My response: I heard HongKong investment's management called Hongkong police on July 2nd of 2004 about the possible money laundry regarding my request to transfer this $500Million to the United States on July 1st of 2004.
What I heard is it has already been verified that Hongkong investment's management had transferred this $500Million to the United States as I requested, around July 10th of 2004 or so, after Hongkong law enforcement clarified the money laundry confusion. American Mr. Walton had already verified he had received this $500Million in July of 2004 and he had invested this $500 Million according to what was specified in the legal documentation that accompanied with this money transfer.
My trust was set up as an entity which means the capitals from the trust was the investment instead of a loan.
The conclusion: My request to transfer $500Million from the Hong Kong trust I inherited to the United States was never a money laundry.
----March 25th, 2018
Heard this morning's talk about why the comfortableness to make claims when there's no ground(中文附后）.
My response: Let me share some of my frustration and some rumors I heard of to help everyone to analyze why.
I had met that three notorious Chinese guys in 1988, 1989 and 1991, just met once each (two in-person) and that is it. All three were in a 1989's meeting when I was a college student in Shanghai that all three had heard I have huge wealth to inherit abroad, all three had moved on with their own life after that "met incidence", but they all have developed this comfortableness of being the master of me. In 2004, they played this same trick, and you already heard this comfortableness on the radio so loudly.
I recently heard my father's college romance story was similar. I heard my father invited his college girlfriend to visit his family in Shanghai around 1960, and my grandfather treated her well. I heard she can't forget the luxury places (of that time) she had chances to go to even after all these years. Well, after all these unforgettable experiences, she left my father and married someone else in Beijing very easily after just a year of her college graduation. And I heard after she became the mother of three children who all have nothing to do with my father biologically, she took my mother's wedding gift sent by my grandfather's friends so comfortably and kept declaring she got that was because she is the "true love" of my father. I heard her children are now demanding to have a share of my inherited wealth because they are the true beloved of their mother who is the "true love" of my father.
On the radio, you must have heard so many denouncing statements with a master's tone just because "met in a 2004's meeting and there was a matrimony discussion in the meeting" incidence. And they all deserve to have a saying over my lawful wealth, it is obviously not just saying over my wealth but the decision power.
Who empowered them? Who is in what position to empower them? How can they be empowered over my finance without their own access to it? Obviously, the person or the group who has been empowering them has no valid access to my lawfully inherited lawful wealth.
How about my grandfather's wealth? My father did not get a penny from my grandfather when my grandfather passed away in 1965, and there are tons of rumors about that. One of the rumor is that that college ex-girlfriend in Beijing had received my father's share. If this rumor is true, I doubted that giving was from my grandfather because my grandfather should have known that my father did not visit Beijing at each time when she was conceived of her children as a married woman since 1961.
The Chinese government has this strong argument how could I possibly have inheritable if I grew up no money in China. Well, if you heard my mother did not receive any wedding gifts from my father's siblings or my grandfather's friends, and only used one (switched from the new by her eldest sister) from her maiden family, why you think I could possibly receive anything from abroad? Till now, my family has not heard what else has been taken so comfortably or by whom other than the foreign-made-watch taken by that ex-girlfriend from Beijing.
----March 25th, 2018
听说了有关香港那个5亿美金的困扰。
我的回应：我听说香港企业的管理层在2004年7月2日就我于2004年7月1日提出要转5亿美金到美国的要求是否是在洗钱通报了香港警方。
我听说已经证实的事实是，香港企业的管理层在香港警方澄清洗钱怀疑后，已于2004年7月10日前后将这笔5亿美金的钱款按照我的要求转入美国交付沃顿先生进行投资。美国人沃顿先生也已经证实他已于2004年7月收到这笔由香港转入的5亿美金款项并已经按照这笔5亿美金转账时所附法律文件的要求进行了投资。
我爷爷替我设立信托时是将我的信托注册登记为法人机构的，也就是说我的信托所放出的钱款是投资项目而不是贷款项目。
结论：我所要求的从我所继承的设在香港的信托里转入美国进行投资的5亿美金从来不是洗钱行为。
----2018年3月25日。
听说了今天早上所提到的“这些态度要求根本就没有任何理由，哪来的这份理所应当？”
我的回应：让我也来投诉投诉，再听听我都听说了些什么，大家一起来分析分析怎么回事啊。
我是在1988，1989 和1991年认识了那三个臭名昭著的中国名流男子，每个人都是只交往过一次（就是认识的那一次），只见过其中两个，仅此而已。三个都参加了1989年的全国高校会议，我当时是上海一所大学的学生，三个也都在那次会上听说了我会有大笔在海外的钱可以继承，三个也都是在认识我之后都活的各自各精彩都有他们自己的私人生活，但都有一种他们已经是我的主子的态度。2004年，他们好像玩的是同一种手法，你们现在也都在广播里听到这份理所应当的态度了。
我最近听说了我父亲大学时的恋爱经历也是类似。我听说我父亲在1960年前后邀请了他当时大学里的女友去上海见了我父亲的家人，我爷爷当时对这个女友招待的很好。我听说就是过了这么多年，那个女的都难以忘记我父亲带她去过的那些那个年代的奢侈地方。不过呐，在有了这么些难忘的经历之后，她大学毕业后的一年里就很轻易的离开了我父亲并在北京和别人结婚了。我听说在她有了三个和我父亲没有亲生血缘关系的孩子之后，她很理所应当的就把我爷爷的朋友们送给我母亲的结婚礼物给拿走了，她还到处说她是我父亲的“真爱”是她可以这么做的原因。我听说现在这个北京前女友的小孩们要求分我所继承的财产就是因为他们是他们母亲真正最爱的，而他们的母亲是我父亲的“真爱”。
在广播里，你们一定已经听到了那么一堆“和你从来没有任何关系”的声明，都是一副语气铿锵的主子态度，而这些都是因为"在2004年的一个会议认识了我而在那个会上我有过一些谈婚论嫁的讨论”的这么一个事件。而且，他们都是够资格对我的财产指手画脚，还很明确的不只是指手划脚而已，而是应该对我的财产的使用分配有决定权。
谁赋予他们的这份权力？是在什么位置上的什么人可以赋予他们这一份权力？他们是如何在他们自己拿不到我的钱的情况下可以有这么一份权力？很明显，这些赋予他们这份权利的一些人自己并没有所谓的渠道可以拿到我所合法继承的合法财产。
会不会是我爷爷的财产造成的？都知道我爷爷于1965年去世时，我父亲没有拿到我爷爷的一分钱财产，至于究竟怎么回事有很多的传言。其中的一个传言就是这个北京的前女友收到了我父亲的那一份。如果这个传言是真的话，我很怀疑这钱是我爷爷给的，因为我爷爷应该会知道在这个北京前女友1961年左右结了婚之后每一次的受孕前后，我父亲都没有从南京因公或因私到北京出差过。
中国政府说我假冒伪造的强有力依据就如果我有大笔财产可以继承，为什么我在中国长大的过程当中确实一分钱都没有。如果你听说了我母亲结婚的时候，就没有收到一份我父亲的弟妹们送的，我爷爷的朋友们送的，甚至她自己娘家姐妹兄弟给的新的都是被南京王博真用她自己家里用过的旧的给换过的，我妈妈是什么都没有就这么嫁进了我父亲的家。你要是听说了这些，你还认为我能收到国外送进来的任何东西啊？直到现在，我们家都还没听说除了那个外国造的手表被北京的那个前女友给直接拿走之外，还有哪些国外送进来的什么东西被谁给拿走了。
究竟谁是那个撑腰的？究竟什么原因可以以这些没有法律依据甚至没有正常思维逻辑的狡辩作为理直气壮的理由而让所有受害者的愤怒不已？
----2018年3月25日。
谁赋予他们的这份权力？是在什么位置上的什么人可以赋予他们这一份权力？他们是如何在他们自己拿不到我的钱的情况下可以有这么一份权力？很明显，这些赋予他们这份权利的一些人自己并没有所谓的渠道可以拿到我所合法继承的合法财产。
会不会是我爷爷的财产造成的？都知道我爷爷于1965年去世时，我父亲没有拿到我爷爷的一分钱财产，至于究竟怎么回事有很多的传言。其中的一个传言就是这个北京的前女友收到了我父亲的那一份。如果这个传言是真的话，我很怀疑这钱是我爷爷给的，因为我爷爷应该会知道在这个北京前女友1961年左右结了婚之后每一次的受孕前后，我父亲都没有从南京因公或因私到北京出差过。
中国政府说我假冒伪造的强有力依据就如果我有大笔财产可以继承，为什么我在中国长大的过程当中确实一分钱都没有。如果你听说了我母亲结婚的时候，就没有收到一份我父亲的弟妹们送的，我爷爷的朋友们送的，甚至她自己娘家姐妹兄弟给的新的都是被南京王博真用她自己家里用过的旧的给换过的，我妈妈是什么都没有就这么嫁进了我父亲的家。你要是听说了这些，你还认为我能收到国外送进来的任何东西啊？直到现在，我们家都还没听说除了那个外国造的手表被北京的那个前女友给直接拿走之外，还有哪些国外送进来的什么东西被谁给拿走了。
究竟谁是那个撑腰的？究竟什么原因可以以这些没有法律依据甚至没有正常思维逻辑的狡辩作为理直气壮的理由而让所有受害者的愤怒不已？
----2018年3月25日。
03-24-2018 Early investment is very important
Heard this morning's talk about my girl's skincare annoyed a lot of girls' mothers.
My response: My skin-caring for my girl is because I was a girl. I want my girl to have what I did not have at her age.
I am a medical college pharmacology major graduated that I always pay attention to health professionals' advise. Skin-care professionals are skin healthcare professionals. The advice I listen to is advice given to mothers of girls, not riches. And I did not discuss how expensive it has to be to make my skin-care wish for my girl effective.
I am sorry to my son that I am a girl and I don't know what can be beneficial to a boy for his lifetime if special attention paid at his early ages, other than regular attentions have paid on health and interests-developing to both of them.
Another thing I know paying attention to at early time makes a huge difference in a child's life is the Education saving advise from financial professionals.
If the parents can jointly save $500/month between the time after the child was born and before entering elementary school, and find an educational account that has the yield of 5%, only 4 years saving like this can make $40,000 for the child's college education.
----March, 24th, 2018
03-22-2018 Let your disgusting whore wives read this aloud to ease your concerns of me stuck-on you: "David Petraeus, E. Ford, James Walton, you are psychos, you are pigs, you are the disgusting unwanted leftover human waste"
Heard this morning's talk about why I still think I have money after I been publicly loudly denounced.
My response: That is my anger about who is the prostituting party in this argument.
Why "no marriage has been verified" by the same group of people after intentionally and illegally "set up" all those efforts of announcing children identifiable on a public channel radio, knowing "no marriage means no child at all" was said loudly on July 1st in 2004, is this just to trash those children as "never wanted or never should exist children", how can this be publicly supported as freedom of speech? Isn't this child abuse?
Are these efforts to say that "No marriage means no maiden family" is to deny my lawful inheriting of my trusts that set up for me by my own maiden birth grandfathers?
----March 22nd, 2018
Heard this morning's talk about how dare I can insult a wife knowing that is a woman who has a husband.
My response: Is that means any single woman deserves to be smashed as long as that is done by a female who has a stick gets into her body, even if the issue is purely initiated from that stick-in female's efforts of performing a criminal law defined crime publicly?
----March 22nd, 2018
For those agitation caused by the anger that I could get into fights with this or that person's wife is only because I intend to stuck-on to the husband.
My response: I have to ask why I need to? Does not matter if you are convinced that I have factual inheritances or not, you must have convinced that I truly believe I have my own inheritances. Because of the famous fights that I got into with O'Connors' family, you must have convinced that I truly believed my inheritances were not from my underwear department because that Fund was never owned by any Rockefeller, or any Ford, or any Walton.
Why you are so convinced that I need to fight over this or that Old knowing I am, at least, the same rich? That Fund I got into fights with O'Connors is owned by the British East India Company Financier, this is already obvious that I am wealthier than all that three big names I had met, why I need to stuck-on them to cause such anxiety from their pig-fuckable wives? If these males are not pig alike, why would they ever fancy I would ever want any human wife's left-over?
it seems it is the efforts from their psycho psychologist, this non-stop harassment on public radio and in my glass house cancer session, that I need to acknowledge they are married now no matter how clearly I have made myself on this web blog, so I have to say this aloud on my web blog this way to tell everybody this is sexual harassment from organized criminals whence you read this necessary & must announcement in this one-and-only possibly understandable way as following:
Why not a young and handsome male for myself just for the sake of wealth I can share with? Isn't that make you so convinced that is the reason this or that rich name deserves a young female? why not a young male for myself just because I am the same rich? Why being the same rich, I need to stuck on their old and malfunction-possible agitations? isn't this is your points of anger about oldness this entire time? why would you assume that I would need oldness for no money reason at all?
----March 22nd, 2018
I know I am protected by laws, and I know my freedom of speech is protected by laws as well.
----March 22nd, 2018
I heard this morning's talk about my five fingers.
My response: Following is what I said:
----March 22nd, 2018
For those agitation caused by the anger that I could get into fights with this or that person's wife is only because I intend to stuck-on to the husband.
My response: I have to ask why I need to? Does not matter if you are convinced that I have factual inheritances or not, you must have convinced that I truly believe I have my own inheritances. Because of the famous fights that I got into with O'Connors' family, you must have convinced that I truly believed my inheritances were not from my underwear department because that Fund was never owned by any Rockefeller, or any Ford, or any Walton.
Why you are so convinced that I need to fight over this or that Old knowing I am, at least, the same rich? That Fund I got into fights with O'Connors is owned by the British East India Company Financier, this is already obvious that I am wealthier than all that three big names I had met, why I need to stuck-on them to cause such anxiety from their pig-fuckable wives? If these males are not pig alike, why would they ever fancy I would ever want any human wife's left-over?
it seems it is the efforts from their psycho psychologist, this non-stop harassment on public radio and in my glass house cancer session, that I need to acknowledge they are married now no matter how clearly I have made myself on this web blog, so I have to say this aloud on my web blog this way to tell everybody this is sexual harassment from organized criminals whence you read this necessary & must announcement in this one-and-only possibly understandable way as following:
It seems there is no other way your disgusting pig-fuckable wife can realize you are such a trash leftover to me, so I say this aloud to let you hear this clearly:
David Petraeus, you are a psycho, you are a pig, you are the disgusting unwanted leftover human waste. Don't ever fancy your disgusting finger can ever touch me. Don't ever fancy your disgusting whore wife can touch my money.
E. Ford (Charles Ford/Charles Schnieberg ), you are a psycho, you are a pig, you are the disgusting unwanted leftover human waste. Don't ever fancy your disgusting finger can ever touch me. Don't ever fancy your disgusting whore wife can touch my money.
James Walton, you are a psycho, you are a pig, you are the disgusting unwanted leftover human waste. Don't ever fancy your disgusting finger can ever touch me. Don't ever fancy your disgusting whore wife can touch my money.
Why not a young and handsome male for myself just for the sake of wealth I can share with? Isn't that make you so convinced that is the reason this or that rich name deserves a young female? why not a young male for myself just because I am the same rich? Why being the same rich, I need to stuck on their old and malfunction-possible agitations? isn't this is your points of anger about oldness this entire time? why would you assume that I would need oldness for no money reason at all?
----March 22nd, 2018
I know I am protected by laws, and I know my freedom of speech is protected by laws as well.
----March 22nd, 2018
I heard this morning's talk about my five fingers.
My response: Following is what I said:
I heard there are some confusion regarding if I indeed have inherited money and why so many people who were informed to attain the meeting are not having any inheritance at all. I heard the confusion is so severe that Chinese government assumed I was paid to swear a lot about Chinese government since 2015.
I remembered it was either on June 30th or July 1st of 2004, I was happy telling everyone I had inherited my grandfathers' blessing. I did not know what I inherited, and I did not know which grandfather. I started to count my fingers to calculate how many greats needed to be the prefix to address the grandfather who had given me such handsome inheritances when I was asked which grandfather I inherited from. I remembered I was interrupted before I figured which one when I counted number 5, and I was asked if that is enough number already, I said possibly not (because the fund is indeed very good sized), I was told someone already announced no romance at all with me but I did not pay attention to since I was still trying to calculate. But somehow, Chinese government figured the inheritances I was talking about was actually meant that I got some "female butts" money.
Also, I heard some Chinese diplomats had contacted a lot of people to have some money from the meeting after that incident. Only one of those was my first cousin who is mothered by my father's sister. I heard a lot of them are very angry that they were informed to attain the meeting, why there is no money for them at all. I have to clarify I did not have any butts’ money and I have no money for them.
----March 22nd, 2018
03-20-2018 Two different Accounts & Why my lawful private wealth’s inheriting is Chinese government's Sovereign Issue?(两个账本&我私人财产继承怎么成了中国政府的主权问题了？）
Heard the arguments about why I echo R's claim on romance but reject Pejoves' saying of my money.
My response: The difference is who has the ownership or privilege or authority to announce what.
Any R does have the authority and privilege in his own private compartment.
A Jessica Pejoves recruited actressing "law enforcement" does not have the authority to state anything about my lawful money or may lawful blood association.
I heard this morning's arguing parties were some O'Connors and some Pejoves. Only one line "Min Fang has her money in the United States" was said by the law enforcement who is investigating my case.
The entire time, it has been these O'Connors and these Pejoves arguing if I possibly truly have any biological children.
I assumed the reason that these Pejoves and these O'Connor kept trying to have sayings over my matter is that my yearly providing ($400 Million medical and rumored $400 Million living ) was misunderstood as the increase of their agreed-upon providing.
Their agreed-upon providing is part of local American companies' expense which is deducted from the local American companies' yearly earnings before the local American companies paying their American business tax.
My yearly providing is paid from the business profit of the local American companies that needed to be handed-in to their British parent companies. The business profit is the remaining of local American companies' yearly earnings after local American companies paid their American business tax.
My yearly providing has nothing to do with their agreed-upon providing. My yearly providing cannot be confused with their agreed-upon providing.
----March 20th, 2018
Two different Accounts
My response: I got into the fight with O'Connors about who owns that American Fund. If my providing has not been taken by some O'Connors as rumored, I have no reason to get into this fight. The rumored providing paid for my living cost in 2016 was paid expense from its British parent fund's (owner's) equity account as instructed by its British parent fund. Theirs is from local American Fund's operating expense.
----February 8th, 2018
This American Fund's British Parent Fund is owned by the same French Fund that owns the British East India Company Financier.
----February 11th, 2018
This above accounts issue is also the issue between some Pejoves names in the U.S with me by rumor. In the U.S, my providing and theirs providing both deducted from local American Fund's parent British Fund's capital account. But in Britain, my providing is paid by the British Fund's parent French Fund so that my providing is deducted from the British Fund's parent French Fund's Capital Account, and theirs is deducted from the local British Fund's operating expense accounts.
Conclusion: Their providing is paid by the British Fund, My providing is paid by the British Fund's parent French Fund. Nothing to do with each other.
Explanation: What I have inherited are trusts that my birth grandfathers set up for me before I was born.
My name (Min Fang) is in my trust (Example Name: XYZ), this trust XYZ has invested a company ABC, this company ABC only has the trust XYZ as the name of its investor in its capital account (owner's account which means company ABC's owner is the trust XYZ). The company ABC further invested a company ABC-1, the company ABC-1 only has the company ABC as its investor in its capital account which means ABC-1's owner is the company ABC, etc. that there are these company ABC-1-1, company ABC-1-1-1, company ABC-1-1-1-1, etc. My named account (Min Fang) is only in my trust XYZ, but my providing can be paid by the company ABC-1-1-1-1 that later deducted from the company ABC-1-1-1's profiting share, and subsequently deducted from company ABC-1-1, company ABC-1, company ABC, and then deducted from my named capital account ( Min Fang's capital account) in my trust XYZ.
Another way to get my providing is to let my trust wire that money directly to me which is seldom used by investors because of inconvenience caused by tedious procedures. Also, the Investor's tax for each providing check is paid to the country according to its signing local company's geographic location.
----February 27th, 2018
Heard there is a French name now that is so confusing to his girlfriend for the similar speculation.
My response: I am on that French Fund's Spanish Investor's spending account. I have nothing to do with the French young and handsome who I have not heard of yet or met in person yet.
A lot of people are speculating how long it will take the deserved to have some money group to discover a confused girlfriend of a Spanish name to miserable everybody.
----March 17th, 2018
Albert Gore has nothing to do with me for him to say anything on my any matter. And I refuse to let Albert Gore have any saying over my any matter. Please contact 911 police if he insists on you to listen to his saying about my matter which certainly would put you into legal troubles, or call his psychiatrist daughter or any psychiatrist about his severe illusion that he can have any saying over my any matter. He is probably having some sever psychiatry medical situation called Delusional disorder if he indeed just won't stop insisting on having saying over not-his-to-say my any matter, please call 911 or the psychiatrist daughter who will certainly help Albert Gore.
----February 1st, 2018
Rumored the reason I should not be acknowledged as the Creator of Beijing Olympic Opening is that if FBI did not record, then my creative ideas won't be produced.
My response: This is a true statement that obviously and definitely would results in Beijing Olympic Game opening would never be presented as it was.
The 2008 Beijing Olympic Game Opening is what it was is because that is produced by my creative ideas. The creator of 2008 Beijing Olympic Opening is Min Fang is a matter of fact that no decent lawful person can deny, not to mention those claimed talented enough to lead a Nation. The opportunity to lead a Nation to serve the people is not the same meaning of being the driving force to violate laws to rob the people. I am an individual and this is my individual case but I won't be the only individual as part of the people's definition that being robbed if government official position means the power to perform the robbery to the people.
-----February 10th, 2018
Heard this morning's talk about Chinese Premier's Sovereign talk regarding the trust my birth grandfather set up for me in Hong Kong.
My response: Even according to People's Republic of China's laws, the matter is a private wealth inheriting matter, why it becomes such a Chinese Sovereign issue? Is this imply that current administration of Chinese government is the government that "sharing one wife already that so should share everybody's wealth as well"?
I do not have any association including no sexual association with this administration of China's sharing one wife government.
I refuse my lawful private wealth to be "shared".
I make my comment about this administration of the People's Republic of China's government according to their own logic. They swear my name in order to own my lawful private wealth illegally, I shit their names in order to protect my own lawful private wealth.
I am a such famous "fake talented" because my intellectual income deserved to be owned by whoever wants some easy money, I am such a famous unwanted "female" because my providing from my own birth grandfathers' blessing deserved to be understood as "some rich man's donation" that should be owned by whoever has a used female underwear.
I am sick of the shouts "As long as I am the one still in his bed and mother his child(ren), I won't be the one who is afraid".
I have no need to shout now but to make myself clear "as long as I have the same size and same quality level of attorney service as that him, why I need to be afraid? I send you both to the laws."
----03-08-2018
听说了今天早上所播出的中国政府总理所谈参与争夺我爷爷在香港替我设立的信托是在捍卫中国主权的说法。
我的回应: 即使是按照中华人民共和国的法律，我爷爷替我在香港设立的信托也是非常明确的私人财产继承事宜，为什么就变成了这一届中国政府的主权之争？这是在说这一届的中国共产党政府是个“既然已经共了一个妻当然应该共所有人的产”的政府吗？”
我1996年离开中国时的中国共产党政府没有共妻，我也没觉着当时的政府想共我的产。 我现在已经是美国公民，我和中国习近平李克强共妻政府的任何官员都没有任何因公因私关系或者性关系。
我拒绝我自己的私人合法财产被“共产”。
我就中国政府所发表的言论完全遵循中国政府的思维逻辑。中国习近平李克强的共妻政府为掠夺我的合法私有财产对我进行谩骂羞辱的所谓演出，我为捍卫我自己合法私有财产不被公然掠夺，我也是痛骂这届中国习近平李克强的共妻政府根本就是一群只有一个妓院妓女破鞋婊子才会肯让他们下种否则就是断子绝孙的一群婊子养的杂种烂货。我也是会痛骂这届中国政府就只是一群只会满嘴舔着“髀眼价值，髀眼知识，髀眼能力，髀眼道德，髀眼荣宗”的一群没有任何正经女人愿意替他们生儿育女的下三烂猪屎而已。
我现在成了一个这么有名的“假冒伪造”就是因为有些想拿容易钱的人“就是要定了”我的智慧产权收入，我是个这么有名的“没人要的女人”就是因为我自己亲生爷爷留给我的信托所提供的生活费用就是应该被理解成“什么有钱人的捐款”而被一些不知被哪个男人使用过的想要钱的髀眼所拥有。
真是烦，成天就听着一群人扯着嗓门的喊：”只要他的那张床我还能爬得上去，只要我是他孩子的妈，我就是不会怕。”
我现在已经不需要扯着嗓门喊了，我就只要把话讲清楚“只要我自己的律师团的规模质量和那个男的是同等级别的，那我怕什么呀？我把你们两个人一起送上法庭就可以啦。”
----2018年3月8日。
听说了我不应该被承认是北京奥运会创意的原因是如果当时没有被FBI所录影，也就不会有我这份创意。
我的回应：如果这样也就明确一定会造成北京2008奥运会开闭幕式就永远都不会是2008年北京奥运会所向世界呈现的那份制作。
2008年北京奥运会开闭幕式之所以会被制作成2008年时中国向全世界所呈现的那样，就是因为北京2008年奥运会开闭式是采用了我的创意。我方敏是2008北京奥运会开闭幕式的创意是没有任何一个遵纪守法有良知责任的人所能够抵赖的，更不用说那些号称有才华可以领导一个国家的人。能够领导一个国家可以为人民服务的机会绝不应该意味着可以用政府的权利带头破坏法律掠夺老百姓。我是一个个体，这事是牵涉到我的一个个别案例，如果政府职权就只意味着掠夺百姓的便利权利。我方敏绝不会是人民这个定义中唯一被掠夺的一个老百姓。
-----2018年2月10日。
在中华人民共和国大学毕业的应该意味着社么？
我的回应：中华人民共和国北京中央政府2015年-2017通过广播剧用中文及广播剧所播放国家的当地语言，向全世界正式宣布并强调：
1：中华人民共和国根本就没人要操方敏的髀眼，中华人民共和国永远不会需要方敏的任何才华。
2：中国政府最高权力机构中共中央政治局有多人和李克强总理的妻子程虹是事实上的真实男女交媾两性关系，所以程虹才是真正可以领导中华人民共和国经济发展的杰出人才。
3：中华人民共和国根本就没人要操方敏的髀眼，方敏就没有可能对中华人民共和国有过任何贡献，性交功能之内或者之外，方敏都是就只能是个假冒伪造。
4：中华人民共和国李克强总理的妻子程虹为中国政府最高权力机构中共中央多人育有现已成年儿子（海外传言每人一个，共6人，据说广播剧已由各男本人（中国现任高层官员）分别宣布3-4男共妻事实），所以中华人民共和国李克强总理的妻子程虹为防止中华人民共和国断子绝孙国家灭亡的所做杰出贡献绝不可以轻视。
----2018年3月3日。
03-17-2018 Two different Accounts & Why my lawful private wealth’s inheriting is Chinese government's Sovereign Issue?(两个账本&我私人财产继承怎么成了中国政府的主权问题了？）
Heard this morning's an adult R's birth father's(Mr. R Sr) announcement that I was never an R's woman. (中文附后）
My response: True Statement.
----03-06-2018
Two different Accounts
My response: I got into the fight with O'Connors about who owns that American Fund. If my providing has not been taken by some O'Connors as rumored, I have no reason to get into this fight. The rumored providing paid for my living cost in 2016 was paid expense from its British parent fund's (owner's) equity account as instructed by its British parent fund. Theirs is from local American Fund's operating expense.
----February 8th, 2018
This American Fund's British Parent Fund is owned by the same French Fund that owns the British East India Company Financier.
----February 11th, 2018
This above accounts issue is also the issue between some Pejoves names in the U.S with me by rumor. In the U.S, my providing and theirs providing both deducted from local American Fund's parent British Fund's capital account. But in Britain, my providing is paid by the British Fund's parent French Fund so that my providing is deducted from the British Fund's parent French Fund's Capital Account, and theirs is deducted from the local British Fund's operating expense accounts.
Conclusion: Their providing is paid by the British Fund, My providing is paid by the British Fund's parent French Fund. Nothing to do with each other.
Explanation: What I have inherited are trusts that my birth grandfathers set up for me before I was born.
My name (Min Fang) is in my trust (Example Name: XYZ), this trust XYZ has invested a company ABC, this company ABC only has the trust XYZ as the name of its investor in its capital account (owner's account which means company ABC's owner is the trust XYZ). The company ABC further invested a company ABC-1, the company ABC-1 only has the company ABC as its investor in its capital account which means ABC-1's owner is the company ABC, etc. that there are these company ABC-1-1, company ABC-1-1-1, company ABC-1-1-1-1, etc. My named account (Min Fang) is only in my trust XYZ, but my providing can be paid by the company ABC-1-1-1-1 that later deducted from the company ABC-1-1-1's profiting share, and subsequently deducted from company ABC-1-1, company ABC-1, company ABC, and then deducted from my named capital account ( Min Fang's capital account) in my trust XYZ.
Another way to get my providing is to let my trust wire that money directly to me which is seldom used by investors because of inconvenience caused by tedious procedures. Also, the Investor's tax for each providing check is paid to the country according to its signing local company's geographic location.
----February 27th, 2018
Heard there is a French name now that is so confusing to his girlfriend for the similar speculation.
My response: I am on that French Fund's Spanish Investor's spending account. I have nothing to do with the French young and handsome who I have not heard of yet or met in person yet.
A lot of people are speculating how long it will take the deserved to have some money group to discover a confused girlfriend of a Spanish name to miserable everybody.
----March 17th, 2018
Albert Gore has nothing to do with me for him to say anything on my any matter. And I refuse to let Albert Gore have any saying over my any matter. Please contact 911 police if he insists on you to listen to his saying about my matter which certainly would put you into legal troubles, or call his psychiatrist daughter or any psychiatrist about his severe illusion that he can have any saying over my any matter. He is probably having some sever psychiatry medical situation called Delusional disorder if he indeed just won't stop insisting on having saying over not-his-to-say my any matter, please call 911 or the psychiatrist daughter who will certainly help Albert Gore.
----February 1st, 2018
Rumored the reason I should not be acknowledged as the Creator of Beijing Olympic Opening is that if FBI did not record, then my creative ideas won't be produced.
My response: This is a true statement that obviously and definitely would results in Beijing Olympic Game opening would never be presented as it was.
The 2008 Beijing Olympic Game Opening is what it was is because that is produced by my creative ideas. The creator of 2008 Beijing Olympic Opening is Min Fang is a matter of fact that no decent lawful person can deny, not to mention those claimed talented enough to lead a Nation. The opportunity to lead a Nation to serve the people is not the same meaning of being the driving force to violate laws to rob the people. I am an individual and this is my individual case but I won't be the only individual as part of the people's definition that being robbed if government official position means the power to perform the robbery to the people.
-----February 10th, 2018
Heard this morning's talk about Chinese Premier's Sovereign talk regarding the trust my birth grandfather set up for me in Hong Kong。
My response: Even according to People's Republic of China's laws, the matter is a private wealth inheriting matter, why it becomes such a Chinese Sovereign issue? Is this imply that current administration of Chinese government is the government that "sharing one wife already that so should share everybody's wealth as well"?
I do not have any association including no sexual association with this administration of China's sharing one wife government.
I refuse my lawful private wealth to be "shared".
I make my comment about this administration of the People's Republic of China's government according to their own logic. They swear my name in order to own my lawful private wealth illegally, I shit their names in order to protect my own lawful private wealth.
I am a such famous "fake talented" because my intellectual income deserved to be owned by whoever wants some easy money, I am such a famous unwanted "female" because my providing from my own birth grandfathers' blessing deserved to be understood as "some rich man's donation" that should be owned by whoever has a used female underwear.
I am sick of the shouts "As long as I am the one still in his bed and mother his child(ren), I won't be the one who is afraid".
I have no need to shout now but to make myself clear "as long as I have the same size and same quality level of attorney service as that him, why I need to be afraid? I send you both to the laws."
----03-08-2018
听说了今天早上所播出的中国政府总理所谈参与争夺我爷爷在香港替我设立的信托是在捍卫中国主权的说法。
我的回应: 即使是按照中华人民共和国的法律，我爷爷替我在香港设立的信托也是非常明确的私人财产继承事宜，为什么就变成了这一届中国政府的主权之争？这是在说这一届的中国共产党政府是个“既然已经共了一个妻当然应该共所有人的产”的政府吗？”
我1996年离开中国是的中国共产党政府没有共妻，我也没觉着当时的政府想共我的产。 我现在已经是美国公民，我和中国习近平李克强共妻政府的任何官员都没有任何因公因私关系或者性关系。
我拒绝我自己的私人合法财产被“共产”。
我就中国政府所发表的言论完全遵循中国政府的思维逻辑。中国习近平李克强的共妻政府为掠夺我的合法私有财产对我进行谩骂羞辱的所谓演出，我为捍卫我自己合法私有财产不被公然掠夺，我也是痛骂这届中国习近平李克强的共妻政府根本就是一群只有一个妓院妓女破鞋婊子才会肯让他们下种否则就是断子绝孙的一群婊子养的杂种烂货。我也是会痛骂这届中国政府就只是一群只会满嘴舔着“髀眼价值，髀眼知识，髀眼能力，髀眼道德，髀眼荣宗”的一群没有任何正经女人愿意替他们生儿育女的下三烂猪屎而已。
我现在成了一个这么有名的“假冒伪造”就是因为有些想拿容易钱的人“就是要定了”我的智慧产权收入，我是个这么有名的“没人要的女人”就是因为我自己亲生爷爷留给我的信托所提供的生活费用就是应该被理解成“什么有钱人的捐款”而被一些不知被哪个男人使用过的想要钱的髀眼所拥有。
真是烦，成天就听着一群人扯着嗓门的喊：”只要他的那张床我还能爬得上去，只要我是他孩子的妈，我就是不会怕。”
我现在已经不需要扯着嗓门喊了，我就只要把话讲清楚“只要我自己的律师团的规模质量和那个男的是同等级别的，那我怕什么呀？我把你们两个人一起送上法庭就可以啦。”
----2018年3月8日
听说了我不应该被承认是北京奥运会创意的原因是如果当时没有被FBI所录影，也就不会有我这份创意。
我的回应：如果这样也就明确一定会造成北京2008奥运会开闭幕式就永远都不会是2008年北京奥运会所向世界呈现的那份制作。
2008年北京奥运会开闭幕式之所以会被制作成2008年时中国向全世界所呈现的那样，就是因为北京2008年奥运会开闭式是采用了我的创意。我方敏是2008北京奥运会开闭幕式的创意是没有任何一个遵纪守法有良知责任的人所能够抵赖的，更不用说那些号称有才华可以领导一个国家的人。能够领导一个国家可以为人民服务的机会绝不应该意味着可以用政府的权利带头破坏法律掠夺老百姓。我是一个个体，这事是牵涉到我的一个个别案例，如果政府职权就只意味着掠夺百姓的便利权利。我方敏绝不会是人民这个定义中唯一被掠夺的一个老百姓。
-----2018年2月10日。
在中华人民共和国大学毕业的应该意味着社么？
我的回应：中华人民共和国北京中央政府2015年-2017通过广播剧用中文及广播剧所播放国家的当地语言，向全世界正式宣布并强调：
1：中华人民共和国根本就没人要操方敏的髀眼，中华人民共和国永远不会需要方敏的任何才华。
2：中国政府最高权力机构中共中央政治局有多人和李克强总理的妻子程虹是事实上的真实男女交媾两性关系，所以程虹才是真正可以领导中华人民共和国经济发展的杰出人才。
3：中华人民共和国根本就没人要操方敏的髀眼，方敏就没有可能对中华人民共和国有过任何贡献，性交功能之内或者之外，方敏都是就只能是个假冒伪造。
4：中华人民共和国李克强总理的妻子程虹为中国政府最高权力机构中共中央多人育有现已成年儿子（海外传言每人一个，共6人，据说广播剧已由各男本人（中国现任高层官员）分别宣布3-4男共妻事实），所以中华人民共和国李克强总理的妻子程虹为防止中华人民共和国断子绝孙国家灭亡的所做杰出贡献绝不可以轻视。
----2018年3月3日。
03-16-2018 What are the frustrations? （到底吵的是什么呀？）
Heard this morning's talk about my SSI
My response：My providing through Social Security system was requested and agreed-upon on July 1st of 2004 in concern of issues that often happen when a private wealthy is under-entrusting. The Social Security Administration's office that granted this approval of my providing request which is the same office that has also received my providing-payments from my trusts, is the office that supervises the Social Security Welfare office which includes the SSI office.
I do not know the criteria for approving this type of request. I know the concerns of entrusting wealth related can be helped by food stamps and housing projects to ease pressures of working for food while entrusted-wealth can afford all these expenses.
----March 16th, 2018
Heard saying "It is only the government's Justice Department says this or that is my lawful money."
My response: Not only the government's Justice Department who represents the United States laws stating this or that is my lawful money but also the money-paying companies testified that the paid-out money is for my lawful exclusive usage according to their acknowledged & known lawful money-owners' lawful instructions.
----March 16th, 2018
I am asked, "if someone deserved to be poor is the reason I refuse to give out money".
My response: My answer to the question if that person deserved to be poor depends on if I am swearing about that person or not.
But the reason I refuse to give out my own money is that I do not owe that person any money.
And I think if that person in need of help, charities and the government's welfare agency are the places that have the standard to decide if that is a person in poverty.
----March 16th, 2018
I am asked, "if someone is willing to reach out to help people in needs, why it has to be this someone's own money?"
My response: I think it may not need to be this someone's own money ---
If this someone is hired by a charity or the government's welfare agency, but this someone has to follow the standard that is defined by the charity or the government agency this someone works for because the funding is not from this someone's own money.
Or if this someone is authorized to represent the owner who lawfully owns the money on this giving-out money matter. This someone has to follow the conditions that decided by the lawful owner of the money on this giving-out money matter as well.
I am saying it is by laws that only this someone's own money can be given out as this someone's own free-wish.
----March 16, 2018
听到了所谓“只要她的丈夫是我同父同母的弟弟，她就是够资格吵闹骂砸。”
我的回应：我很清楚我的父母才是在我同父同母的弟弟饿的时候管饭，冷的时候添衣的人，从来不是我。我很清楚我自己只是一个和他一起长大的姐姐，从来就没为他的头疼脑热不能安眠。
在我得知我弟弟支持我的父母年迈后是不需要有人在乎是否冷了饿了，更不需要有人知疼问病之后，在我知道了生我养我的父母是被我弟弟的婚姻家庭因为要我父母的房子或被气的一病不起或被公然赶走，我就已经表明了我选择在乎生我养我的我自己父母的立场，我不会幻想我弟弟或者我弟弟的婚姻家庭会在乎我的死活，更不用说他们是否会在乎我的生活起居或者我的情绪跌宕。我也决不会去幻想我的生活会需要他们的小孩来过问照顾。我的生活里永远都不会需要他们。我很习惯没有他们的生活。
我不会允许我自己及我自己婚姻家人的生活被他们所吵闹骂砸，我更不会允许我自己及我自己婚姻家人的法律权益被他们所践踏。该报警该采取法律行动时，我从未犹豫过，我也永远不会犹豫。
----2018年3月16日。
听到了所谓"这是你妈妈嫡亲娘家的亲戚，你为什么不给钱?"
我的回应：就算他们和我的母亲是血缘上的同父同母，他们也从来不是我母亲的亲生兄弟姐妹。
否则，他们就不会明知他们自己从我母亲11岁起就没有和我母亲在同一个城市工作生活的情况下，居然到处宣传说我母亲是个偷人的婊子而已，就算我和我母亲的丈夫有同样的家族胎记也只能是一个婊子养的不配继承我亲生父亲家的亲生爷爷们给我的财产。
何况，自从我的母亲被我母亲的亲妈一生下来就扔出去又被我的亲外公（我母亲亲妈的丈夫）捡回来以后，我的母亲就是由我的亲外公王怀迎一个人养大的。我母亲的亲妈对我母亲是不闻不问，如果我亲外公不在家也没带着我母亲一起出门，我母亲的亲妈从来没有不准我母亲吃饭，但是我母亲必须帮忙家里干活包括照顾弟弟妹妹，我听说的就是这样。
而且，我也不清楚这些人和我母亲是否同父。他们自己才是长的不像爹不像妈更不像其他同母的兄弟姊妹。没错，我确实是在说他们自己才有可能是婊子生的，婊子养的，怪不得弄得这么一副婊子嘴脸，婊子腔调。
----2018年3月16日。
03-15-2018 Great Music or Impossibly Perfect Sound of Music
Heard of a lot of anger regarding if I know anything about music.
My response: The accurate saying should be I know what can be the impossible music called "sound of perfection"
I graduated from a medical college, a pharmacology major with 3-years Basic Medial System(BMS) education. That medical college I enrolled was established by my 3-generations grandfathers' donation may be the reason that I had this great opportunity to learn medical as I had so wished but not "the opportunities" to work in a messy and busy state-run public hospital.
But I learned human's muscle, neuron, vocal system that I know what the possible restrictions or limits of perfect human vocals might be.
I had worked as a research and development computer programmer in a company that my own inheritance may have invested that I had this great opportunity to work on great projects without performance reporting issue or project's budgeted time running-out concerns. But we did finish our project in only 4 years’ time.
I was a kernel operating system security programmer that on a login replacement project. One of the approaches I had tried was to load a logged-on user's profile as a remote object because I did not think using a cached password could make the login replacement project a good project.
In order to correctly load a network user's profile remotely, I looked into almost all aspects of how to map a user's profile to the far pointers including a logged-on user's default sound and image settings.
This work experience made me learned a lot about sound & images recording and handling technology that I have some very good concept of what would be "a perfect sound" theoretically.
Plus, I did have a high-school music teacher who was an old-colleague to my mother and taught me some basic piano-playing that I know what makes some sound a music song. And I do enjoy singing a lot and I do have some sing techniques I have developed myself. And I do have the ears I inherited from my ancient Emperor & famous composer grandfather (作曲家爷爷唐玄宗李隆基).
With all these together, I am a very picky vocal lover who knows the value if a singer can sing the impossible "song of perfection", and I am a picky music lover who knows the value of the perfect sound-mix.
This was actually what I had contributed to the conversation that had agonized so many musicians on July 1st of 2004.
----March 15th, 2018
03-14-2018 About Strategic Vision and Strategic Mission
"We provide - directly and through partnerships with other innovative companies - hardware, software, consumables and services to customers in graphic arts, commercial print, publishing, packaging, electronic displays, entertainment and commercial films, and consumer products markets."
----Kodak's Vision StatementMy understanding: I think Vision and Mission should be in line with the company's Longterm development objectives and should be adjusted according to internal and external environmental changes.
I think Kodak's mission statement is from their understanding of what their possible Markets are in the digital era. Kodak now has the digital camera & display products together with their original advantages in graphics printing, publishing, and filming, etc.
----March 14th, 2018
" We will use leading-edge, proprietary technologies to provide top-quality products and services that contribute to the advancement of culture, science, technology and industry, as well as improved health and environmental protection in society. Our overarching aim is to help enhance the quality of life of people worldwide."
----Fuji's Mission StatementMy understanding: Vision and mission are formed based on information gathered from the internal and external analysis.
The Information is the ground to form the Vision of how the company is doing in an industry or in an economy as well as where the company's position is in the ever-changing environment.
The analyzing of the information is the foundation to form the Mission of what the company wants to become.
----March 14th, 2018
Image Display technology and Image Projecting Technology
My response: Image Technology that Fuji and Kodak using are signals receiving related, it doesn't matter if signals are received from a camera glass need to be accurately recorded on a film or image records from a film need to be truthfully displayed on a print. I think Fuji and Kodak have expanded their expertise from Chemical oriented image recording and displaying technology to the electronic and computer-oriented image recording and displaying technology.
The Image technology that Kodak and Fuji have used is different with the imaging technology used in the Television industry. The television technology is similar to the camera's glass technology in comparison with Kodak and Fuji's technology.
The Television technology is similar to a projector technology that is centered on how to accurately projecting electron beam translations of received wireless TV program signals to the display devices. The Television image technology's excellence is measured by the projecting images' color resolution, projecting images' sharpness' definition, and projecting images' displayable screen size.
----March 14th, 2018
Image Display technology and Image Projecting Technology
My response: Image Technology that Fuji and Kodak using are signals receiving related, it doesn't matter if signals are received from a camera glass need to be accurately recorded on a film or image records from a film need to be truthfully displayed on a print. I think Fuji and Kodak have expanded their expertise from Chemical oriented image recording and displaying technology to the electronic and computer-oriented image recording and displaying technology.
The Image technology that Kodak and Fuji have used is different with the imaging technology used in the Television industry. The television technology is similar to the camera's glass technology in comparison with Kodak and Fuji's technology.
The Television technology is similar to a projector technology that is centered on how to accurately projecting electron beam translations of received wireless TV program signals to the display devices. The Television image technology's excellence is measured by the projecting images' color resolution, projecting images' sharpness' definition, and projecting images' displayable screen size.
----March 14th, 2018
03-13-2018 About Managing or Governing （有关管理或者治理 ）
Heard this morning's talk about if I am the heir of my ancient Emperor grandfather.(中文附后）
My response: I am truly the heir of Tang dynasty Emperor Taizong （唐太宗李世民) by blood and family inheriting rule. I did inherit trusts that set up for me with titles and wealth.
Confusion of Charity and Providing
Two different Accounts & Who has a personal first-last named capital account everywhere?
Why my lawful private wealth’s inheriting is Chinese government's Sovereign Issue?
----March 13, 2018
Heard a lot of saying if I know anything about managing.
My response: Well, certainly I do. I learned managerial skills through my work experiences of being an employee and being an independent researcher.
In China, we have a saying that you need to know how to be beaten up before you learn how to beat in Kongfu.
This saying never means that a Kongfu beginner deserves to be beaten up but to say that learn to protect oneself and learn to defend oneself is the beginner's class for kungfu or marshall arts.
It is the same about knowledge on managing or governing.
If a shool-graduated person is never employed as an employee that has been managed, this person may never know there are so many issues in any business or non-business operation that need some managerial skills to identify, to sooth and to resolve.
If an employee has not changed any employer in this employee's work experiences, this employee may never know there are so many different styles of managerial skills or what is effectively managing that is welcomed by those being managed.
If this school-graduated but never employed person think this person self can manage without being managed experience, well, this person may never know what is effective managerial skills or even lawful managerial skills.
If an employee who does not know how to learn managerial skills from being managed experiences, the promotion of this employee who has rich being managed experience won't benefit the business as well as the employees of the business.
There are a lot of issues between me and some of the 1989 group abroad related to this. I say they do not have the work or social experiences to be the real 1989 group and they feel their proved managing talents have been ignored.
----March 13th, 2018
听说了今天早上提到的我是否是唐太宗的继承人。
我的回应：我确实是唐太宗李世民的血脉传承的继承人。我的继承是按照唐太宗李世民家里的血脉传承继承规则。我确实是继承了一些为我设立的托付了丰厚财产及古老头衔的信托。
慈善和供养的混淆
不是同一个帐本以及谁会用本名来作为投资账户的名字来到处投资啊？
我私人财产继承怎么成了中国政府的主权问题了？
----2018年3月13日。
听到了很多有关我是否知道什么是管理的说法。
我的回应：我当然知道啊。我是通过做工的经历以及做了独立研究人员的经历学到的管理。
在中国有种说法就是如果你想学武打功夫，你就先得学会如何挨打。
这种说法可不是说武打功夫的初学者就是应该被人打的鼻青脸肿的，而是说如果想学武打功夫的话，就得先学会如何保护自己以及如何进行有效的防御。
有关管理或者治理的知识也是如此。
如果一个受过学校教育的毕业生从来没有一份替人做过工的经历，这个人可能永远都不会知道在任何一个企事业单位日常营运中会有那么多的问题需要管理技能来予以识别，来予以轻重缓急，来予以处理。
如果一个替人做过工的人从来就没有换过老板的工作经历，这个做过工的人可能就永远都不会知道世上有很多很多不同的管理方式以及什么是有效的并且受到雇员欢迎的的管理方式。
如果一个受过学校教育但从来没有替人做过工的人认为可以凭着自己的理解来管理，那么这个人可能永远都不会知道什么是有效的管理方式甚至说是合乎法律的管理方式。
如果一个替人做过工的人不知道如何从被别人管理的工作经历里学习一些管理技能，那么提拔了这个有着丰富的被人管理经历的人并不能够让任何一个企事业单位以及单位里的员工受到任何益处。
我和海外的一些1989年学运人士的矛盾在很大程度上都和这有关。我说他们根本就没有任何工作或者社会经验说他们自己是真正的89年学运组织者，他们就觉得他们自己那份已经在1989年的学运中得到证实的管理组织才华及能力在海外被忽视了被轻蔑了。
----2018年3月13日。
*还有，就是有些华人因为很喜欢某一家企业或者某一个职位，经常会想一些办法来保障自己的这个职务的“安全性”。其实这种理解很不安全。因为一但有意识地想把这份职务的安全感掌握在自己手里，往往就会采取一些让管理人员“没有办法管理”的做法，而这做法一旦开始就已经将自己放在了管理人员的对立面上。管理人员的能力是通过是否有能力对员工进行管理来体现的。其实在工作中学到的知识以及经验才是职场安全的保障，只是工作地点或者说只是在那里拿工资而已。
----2018年3月13日。
03-11-2018 Confusion of Charity and Providing (慈善和供养的混淆)
Heard confusion about how I could possibly entrust my parents on July 1st of 2004.（中文附后）
My response: I entrusted caring for my parents to be provided on my behave since July 1st of 2004.
----March 11th, 2018
Heard this morning's talk about "as long as my name not in each business' capital account, I can not say I have money".
My response: This is possibly a criminal effort of blocking me to spend my own money but attempts to transfer my own lawful money for illegal usage.
This saying is equally saying that if I have used a pseudo name(a company name) to open a bank account(capital account), even with bank employees testifying that is lawfully my bank account by internal instructions as well as by supporting legal documentation, as long as my name(Min Fang) is not printed or stamped on each single paper dollar bill that has been saved in that bank account, I should not be allowed to spend any money that is saved in that bank account.
Two different Accounts & Who has a personal first-last named capital account everywhere?
----March 11th, 2018
Heard this morning's talk about deserved providing as charity.
My response: Charity means to help to survive, charity never meant to privilege free and easy luxury living.
If you listen to what has been demanded in this morning's talk, you would recognize that is not from any sort of surviving needs. I refuse any of these demands.
The People's Republic of China also has its own government-run welfare system (民政局) and Non--Government Organization provide charities.
If anyone needs charity to survive, please feel comfortable to go to any charity because that is what charity is about, you will be helped if you are qualified. My trusts have been supporting charities through local investments.
---- March 11th, 2018
If a business is my investment and this business is supporting charity, what that got to do with me?
My response: The charity expense is deducted from a Business' operating expenses.
This means
The government is supporting this business doing charity by freeing tax on this charity expenses.
Investors support this business doing charity by freeing investors' profit-share of this charity expenses.
Business management and employees support this business doing charity by earning this much money to do charity.
If a business is my investment that has supported local charities, it certainly means I have supported local charities from my profit-share that has used as the charity expenses.
----March 11th, 2018
Heard this morning's talk about these from the People's Republic of China are the ones who truly know what is the true meaning of Communism.
My response: I gathered from rumors I heard about the radio program that the Communism in the People's Republic of China means "Sharing one wife to share everyone else's wealth."
I gathered this is absolutely from the Communism concept that everybody should do the best everybody can and everybody deserves to get what everybody needs, and I gathered it is interpreted as what all this person can do is to have sexual intercourses and this person indeed works very hard on it daily if not hourly, isn't this person deserves to get what this person truly needs which is an easy luxury life that should be provided by everybody else?
I came from the People's Republic of China, I am a U.S. citizen now and I was never a Communist party member, but I have my different understanding I learned through my growing up years in the People's Republic of China about what motivated Chinese Communist party to be such an overwhelmingly popular party ever since it was established in 1921: To serve the people, to create a better life through hard working with protected fair pay ensured by the government.
I refuse to be a provider of this "communism-style" providing on whoever's sexual intercourses work-experiences.
----March 11th, 2018
听说了有关我哪有可能信托了我的父母的疑问。
我的回应：我是诚信托付了从2004年7月1日起替我照顾我的父母。
----2018年3月11日。
听说了今天早上所提到的"只要我的名字没有出现在每一家投资企业的资本账户的户主名册上，我就不能说那是我的钱"。
我的回应：这有可能是企图不准我花我自己合法钱财而把我的合法钱财转为非法用途的一项犯罪行为。
这种说法也就是等同于在说如果我用一个假名（公司名字）开了一个银行账户（投资人主家资本账户），就算是银行的工作人员证明根据内部指示我方敏是那个银行账户的合法主人，就算同时也有相关的法律文件来证明我是这个银行账户的合法主人，只要我方敏的名字没有被打印或者是像盖章一样的盖在那个银行账户所存有的每一张美元面值的美金纸币上，我方敏就不准花这个银行账号里所存有的任何一张美金纸币。
不是同一个帐本以及谁会用本名来作为投资账户的名字来到处投资啊？
----2018年3月11日。
听说了今天早上所谈的"理应得到的慈善供养"。
我的回应:慈善是提供基本生存所需的帮助，慈善从来不是高规格优越供养免费奢侈生活。
如果你听一下今天早上的诉求谈论。应该可以听出那不是什么基本生存所需的诉求。我拒绝这类诉求。
中华人民共和国也有由国家政府的民政系统以及由非政府机构提供的以慈善目的帮助。
如果有人需要慈善帮助生存所需，请直接向当地的慈善机构提出申请，没有什么不好意思的，慈善的目的就是帮助解决生存所需的一些问题, 只要符合条件，你是会得到你所需要的帮助的。我的信托一直都有通过当地的投资支持当地的慈善机构。
----2018年3月11日。
如果一个企业一直都有支持慈善，就算这个企业是我的投资，可这慈善和我有什么关系?
我的回应：慈善支出是作为公司的一个营运项目支出的。
这也就是说
政府支持这个企业在当地做慈善是通过对这一笔慈善支出不收税的方式进行的。
投资人支持这个企业在当地做慈善是通过对这一笔慈善支出所需的金额不算做营业利润来进行投资利润分成的方式进行的。
企业管理层和员工支持这个企业在当地做慈善是通过努力工作挣出这一笔慈善支出所需的钱来做慈善的方式进行的。
如果我的一个投资企业一直都有支持当地的慈善事业，当然也就是说我已经有通过我在这个投资企业的利润分成在支持当地的慈善事业了。
----2018年3月11日。
听说了今天早上所提到的从中华人民共和国来的才是真正知道什么是真正的共产主义的。
我的回应：我从我听说的一些有关广播剧的传言中已经听出来这共产主义在如今的中华人民共和国就是指“先共妻（共一个女人做老婆），再共产（共其他人的财产过富裕日子）。”
我也听出来这说法绝对是从共产主义的定义和理念”尽其所能，按需分配”而来的。我也听出来对这定义理念的解释就是：其人所能就是男女性交，其人也已经尽其所能的就算没有时时男女性交也是竭尽所能日夜都在男女性交，难道其人就不应该得到其人真正所需要的舒适奢侈不用自己挣钱花的生活吗？
我从中华人民共和国来的，我现在是美国公民，我也从来就不是共产党员。但我在中华人民共和国成长过程中所学到的中国共产党之所以从1921成立伊始就成为在中国最受欢迎的政党的原因是：中国共产党主张国家政党政权是为人民服务的，是鼓励勤劳勇敢，独立自主地创建美好幸福生活的政党政权，全体公民有权充分享受在国家政党政权保障下的平等权利及按劳分配。
我拒绝成为这么一个有着”共产主义风格“而为其他人的”性生活工作经历“而付费的供养人。
----2018年3月11日。
03-10-2018 A bit more About my trust my grandfather set up for me in Hong Kong (有关我爷爷替我在香港设立的信托)
Heard this morning's talk of what my father should do.
My response: Both my younger and I are in our late 40s now. My father has raised me and my younger brother with all he had.
----March 10th, 2018
Heard this morning's talk about my grandmother's “fight” with my great grandmother.
My response: I heard that was when my uncle, my father's youngest sibling, was only several years old. That "fight" was because my grandmother wanted my great grandmother took my uncle with her(my grandmother's) other children for outing. My great grandmother just completely ignored the "fact" my uncle was crying histerically non-stop.
All my grandmother's children are from my great grandmother. All my father's siblings share "the same birth mother, the same birth grandmother".
----March 10th, 2018
A bit more about my trust that my grandfather set up for me in Hong Kong.
My response: I heard it was said on the radio the total that received from my grandfather was "5 Million Chinese Silver Doller". I also heard that "10,000 Chinese Silver dollar in 1949 = ￥10 Million RBM in 2004".
If so, "500,000 Silver Dollar = ￥500 Million RMB". Compare to the total of "5Million Silver Dollar", the size of the gift "50,000 Silver Dollar" I was willing to give to my father's and my grandfather's siblings is not shabby at all.
No wonder Chinese community abroad who know the price of the Silver Dollar never commented if "￥500 Million RMB" is shabby.
----March 10th, 2018
听说了今天早上所提到的我父亲应该怎么做。
我的回应：我和我弟弟现在都已经40多岁了。我父亲当年是倾其所有养大了我和我的弟弟。
----2018年3月10日。
听说了今天早上所提到的我奶奶和我曾祖母的一场“争执”。
我的回应：我听说了那是我父亲兄弟姊妹中最小的我叔叔只有几岁大的时候。那场“争执”是因为我奶奶要我曾祖母带着我的这个叔叔和我奶奶的其他几个孩子们一起出去玩。我曾祖母当时是”完全不理”我的这个叔叔当时已经是哭的“歇斯底里”的嚎啕不止。
我奶奶的所有孩子都是由我曾祖母所出。我父亲的兄弟姊妹们都是出自同一个亲妈，同一个亲奶奶。
----2018年3月10日。
有关我爷爷替我在香港设立的信托。
我的回应：我听说广播上讲的香港一共是收到了我爷爷所托付的五百万（大洋）。我也听说了“1949年时候的1万大洋 = 2004年时候的1千万人民币”。
如果是这样的话，“50万大洋= 5亿人民币”。和我收到的一共就只有5百万大洋相比，我最初愿意给我爷爷及我父亲的兄弟姊妹的·那份“5亿元人民币一家”的礼物规模可是一点都不寒碜。
怪不得海外华裔社区那些知道“大洋”价钱的从来就没说过我方敏给的礼物拿不出手。
我爷爷家里1949年解放前后是住在上海愚园路上的连栋6个三层单户的”人民小区“， 就在上海静安寺一个武警中队招待所的对面。当时是和我爷爷的一个朋友两家分租（各三个单户）。我爷爷奶奶和我的叔叔姑姑们一个三层单户，我曾祖母和我的父亲一个三层单户，另一个是杂用。我父亲从出生就一直是和我的曾祖母一起生活的，我父亲的叔叔姑姑未婚前也都很喜欢我的父亲。这是我愿意给我父亲的叔叔姑姑一家一份礼物的原因。
----2018年3月10日。
03-08-2018 Why my lawful private wealth’s inheriting is Chinese government's Sovereign Issue?(我私人财产继承怎么成了中国政府的主权问题了？）
Heard this morning's talk about Chinese Premier's Sovereign talk regarding the trust my birth grandfather set up for me in Hong Kong.（中文附后）
My response: Even according to People's Republic of China's laws, the matter is a private wealth inheriting matter, why it becomes such a Chinese Sovereign issue? Is this imply that current administration of Chinese government is the government that "sharing one wife already that so should share everybody's wealth as well"?
I do not have any association including no sexual association with this administration of China's sharing one wife government.
I refuse my lawful private wealth to be "shared".
I make my comment about this administration of the People's Republic of China's government according to their own logic. They swear my name in order to own my lawful private wealth illegally, I shit their names in order to protect my own lawful private wealth.
I am a such famous "fake talented" because my intellectual income deserved to be owned by whoever wants some easy money, I am such a famous unwanted "female" because my providing from my own birth grandfathers' blessing deserved to be understood as "some rich man's donation" that should be owned by whoever has a used female underwear.
I am sick of the shouts "As long as I am the one still in his bed and mother his child(ren), I won't be the one who is afraid".
I have no need to shout now but to make myself clear "as long as I have the same size and same quality level of attorney service as that him, why I need to be afraid? I send you both to the laws."
----03-08-2018
听说了今天早上所播出的中国政府总理所谈参与争夺我爷爷在香港替我设立的信托是在捍卫中国主权的说法。
我的回应: 即使是按照中华人民共和国的法律，我爷爷替我在香港设立的信托也是非常明确的私人财产继承事宜，为什么就变成了这一届中国政府的主权之争？这是在说这一届的中国共产党政府是个“既然已经共了一个妻当然应该共所有人的产”的政府吗？
我1996年离开中国是的中国共产党政府没有共妻，我也没觉着当时的政府想共我的产。 我现在已经是美国公民，我和中国习近平李克强共妻政府的任何官员都没有任何因公因私关系或者性关系。
我拒绝我自己的私人合法财产被“共产”。
我就中国政府所发表的言论完全遵循中国政府的思维逻辑。中国习近平李克强的共妻政府为掠夺我的合法私有财产对我进行谩骂羞辱的所谓演出，我为捍卫我自己合法私有财产不被公然掠夺，我也是痛骂这届中国习近平李克强的共妻政府根本就是一群只有一个妓院妓女破鞋婊子才会肯让他们下种否则就是断子绝孙的一群婊子养的杂种烂货。我也是会痛骂这届中国政府就只是一群只会满嘴舔着“髀眼价值，髀眼知识，髀眼能力，髀眼道德，髀眼荣宗”的一群没有任何正经女人愿意替他们生儿育女的下三烂猪屎而已。
我现在成了一个这么有名的“假冒伪造”就是因为有些想拿容易钱的人“就是要定了”我的智慧产权收入，我是个这么有名的“没人要的女人”就是因为我自己亲生爷爷留给我的信托所提供的生活费用就是应该被理解成“什么有钱人的捐款”而被一些不知被哪个男人使用过的想要钱的髀眼所拥有。
真是烦，成天就听着一群人扯着嗓门的喊：”只要他的那张床我还能爬得上去，只要我是他孩子的妈，我就是不会怕。”
我现在已经不需要扯着嗓门喊了，我就只要把话讲清楚“只要我自己的律师团的规模质量和那个男的是同等级别的，那我怕什么呀？我把你们两个人一起送上法庭就可以啦。”
----2018年3月8日。
03-07-2018 The trust my grandfather(my father's father) set up for me in Hong Kong -- 我爷爷（我父亲的父亲）替我在香港设立的信托
Heard this morning's talk about the trust that my grandfather (my father's father 方智仁）set up for me.
My response: I heard the trust was set up in Hong Kong before 1949, It should be set up and have been investing according to British Laws.
----March 7th, 2018
致大娘娘（大姑)家人，小娘娘(小姑)及家人，叔叔及家人：
如果你们就方智仁爷爷在香港替我设立的这个信托有疑问，请委托律师查询。但请不要先假设香港那些受方智仁爷爷委托的律师们不认为你们也是方智仁亲生子女。
我听说方智仁爷爷1965年在上海去世前也确实有把遗言遗嘱（信件）和遗产（银行存折）当面交给你们（两女一子）每一个人。
----2018年3月7日。
老爸爸方文海：如果你就方智仁爷爷在香港替我设立的这个信托有疑问，也请委托律师查询。
----2018年3月7日。
03-06-2018 Two different Accounts & Who has a personal first-last named capital account everywhere?
Heard this morning's an adult R's birth father's(Mr. R Sr) announcement that I was never an R's woman.
My response: True Statement.
----03-06-2018
Two different Accounts
My response: I got into the fight with O'Connors about who owns that American Fund. If my providing has not been taken by some O'Connors as rumored, I have no reason to get into this fight. The rumored providing paid for my living cost in 2016 was paid expense from its British parent fund's (owner's) equity account as instructed by its British parent fund. Theirs is from local American Fund's operating expense.
----February 8th, 2018
This American Fund's British Parent Fund is owned by the same French Fund that owns the British East India Company Financier.
----February 11th, 2018
This above accounts issue is also the issue between some Pejoves names in the U.S with me by rumor. In the U.S, my providing and theirs providing both deducted from local American Fund's parent British Fund's capital account. But in Britain, my providing is paid by the British Fund's parent French Fund so that my providing is deducted from the British Fund's parent French Fund's Capital Account, and theirs is deducted from the local British Fund's operating expense accounts.
Conclusion: Their providing is paid by the British Fund, My providing is paid by the British Fund's parent French Fund. Nothing to do with each other.
Explanation: What I have inherited are trusts that my birth grandfathers set up for me before I was born.
My name (Min Fang) is in my trust (Example Name: XYZ), this trust XYZ has invested a company ABC, this company ABC only has the trust XYZ as the name of its investor in its capital account (owner's account which means company ABC's owner is the trust XYZ). The company ABC further invested a company ABC-1, the company ABC-1 only has the company ABC as its investor in its capital account which means ABC-1's owner is the company ABC, etc. that there are these company ABC-1-1, company ABC-1-1-1, company ABC-1-1-1-1, etc. My named account (Min Fang) is only in my trust XYZ, but my providing can be paid by the company ABC-1-1-1-1 that later deducted from the company ABC-1-1-1's profiting share, and subsequently deducted from company ABC-1-1, company ABC-1, company ABC, and then deducted from my named capital account ( Min Fang's capital account) in my trust XYZ.
Another way to get my providing is to let my trust wire that money directly to me which is seldom used by investors because of inconvenience caused by tedious procedures. Also, the Investor's tax for each providing check is paid to the country according to its signing local company's geographic location.
----February 27th, 2018
Albert Gore has nothing to do with me for him to say anything on my any matter. And I refuse to let Albert Gore have any saying over my any matter. Please contact 911 police if he insists on you to listen to his saying about my matter which certainly would put you into legal troubles, or call his psychiatrist daughter or any psychiatrist about his severe illusion that he can have any saying over my any matter. He is probably having some sever psychiatry medical situation called Delusional disorder if he indeed just won't stop insisting on having saying over not-his-to-say my any matter, please call 911 or the psychiatrist daughter who will certainly help Albert Gore.
----February 1st, 2018
Rumored the reason I should not be acknowledged as the Creator of Beijing Olympic Opening is that if FBI did not record, then my creative ideas won't be produced.
My response: This is a true statement that obviously and definitely would results in Beijing Olympic Game opening would never be presented as it was.
The 2008 Beijing Olympic Game Opening is what it was is because that is produced by my creative ideas. The creator of 2008 Beijing Olympic Opening is Min Fang is a matter of fact that no decent lawful person can deny, not to mention those claimed talented enough to lead a Nation. The opportunity to lead a Nation to serve the people is not the same meaning of being the driving force to violate laws to rob the people. I am an individual and this is my individual case but I won't be the only individual as part of the people's definition that being robbed if government official position means the power to perform the robbery to the people.
-----February 10th, 2018
听说了我不应该被承认是北京奥运会创意的原因是如果当时没有被FBI所录影，也就不会有我这份创意。
我的回应：如果这样也就明确一定会造成北京2008奥运会开闭幕式就永远都不会是2008年北京奥运会所向世界呈现的那份制作。
2008年北京奥运会开闭幕式之所以会被制作成2008年时中国向全世界所呈现的那样，就是因为北京2008年奥运会开闭式是采用了我的创意。我方敏是2008北京奥运会开闭幕式的创意是没有任何一个遵纪守法有良知责任的人所能够抵赖的，更不用说那些号称有才华可以领导一个国家的人。能够领导一个国家可以为人民服务的机会绝不应该意味着可以用政府的权利带头破坏法律掠夺老百姓。我是一个个体，这事是牵涉到我的一个个别案例，如果政府职权就只意味着掠夺百姓的便利权利。我方敏绝不会是人民这个定义中唯一被掠夺的一个老百姓。
-----2018年2月10日。
在中华人民共和国大学毕业的应该意味着社么？
我的回应：中华人民共和国北京中央政府2015年-2017通过广播剧用中文及广播剧所播放国家的当地语言，向全世界正式宣布并强调：
1：中华人民共和国根本就没人要操方敏的逼眼，中华人民共和国永远不会需要方敏的任何才华。
2：中国政府最高权力机构中共中央政治局有多人和李克强总理的妻子程虹是事实上的真实男女交媾两性关系，所以程虹才是真正可以领导中华人民共和国经济发展的杰出人才。
3：中华人民共和国根本就没人要操方敏的逼眼，方敏就没有可能对中华人民共和国有过任何贡献，性交功能之内或者之外，方敏都是就只能是个假冒伪造。
4：中华人民共和国李克强总理的妻子程虹为中国政府最高权力机构中共中央多人育有现已成年儿子（海外传言每人一个，共6人，据说广播剧已由各男本人（中国现任高层官员）分别宣布3-4男共妻事实），所以中华人民共和国李克强总理的妻子程虹为防止中华人民共和国断子绝孙国家灭亡的所做杰出贡献绝不可以轻视。
----2018年3月3日。
03-03-2018 These freak you out almighty powerful(吓死你的那份势力）
老爸爸方文海，你其实是被我给信托了， 我所信托的财产很安全，你也很安全，请尽快和我联系，或者联系南京紫台025-8333-2227，请赶紧和美国领事馆联系(任何地方的美领馆， 上海021-8011-2400），不用担心你是否有有效证件证明身份，他们可以做DNA鉴定来确定你和我的亲生父女关系的。如果老爸爸你因为自己的亲身经历，想在国内找找妈妈王博贤的消息，也最好是在和美国领事馆核实妈妈是否已经在美国之后，或者至少和我方敏取得联系之后，再一起商量商量如何找妈妈并和妈妈取得联系。紫金山天文台http://www.pmo.cas.cn/ztjj/lxfs/
你也可以查询一下你是否有如下医院的医疗保险：
International Hospitals and Clinics in Shanghai
Jiahui Health（嘉会医疗)
Global Healthcare International SOS
Parkway Health Shanghai United Family Healthcare American OBGYN
Delta Health Raffles Medical Group New Vision Eye Clinic
World Path Clinic Landseed Hospital Shanghai Chiropractic
Red Leaf Maternity Hospital Shanghai Sky Clinic
Shanghai East International Medical Center (SEIMC) St Michael Hospital
Institute for Western Surgery Physical Therapy & Sports Medicine (the clinic)
(源自：上海国际医院名单， 索引文章)
妈妈王博贤，听说了你有收到我的信托提供给你的健康照顾，我相信你很好，我会想办法如何可以和你取得联系。爸爸目前和我也失联。你要是能看到这个博客，就去图书馆办个图书馆卡用somebodyinma@gmail.com 和我联系。用手机上的《Email（电邮）》功能就可以。
(*我目前不是太清楚我母亲是否也有故事，她是2006年“去世”。一切就为我的一些爷爷们在我出生前就替我办的信
In 2004, it was mentioned that my father's siblings and my grandfather's siblings would have local health insurances provided that, as a joke, should be deducted from their own money of ￥500 Million that I was willing to gift later or so. They are my father side's relatives that I heard of or am familiar of.
----February 10th, 2018
You need a mother, I send you someone who is willing (since your own birth mother deserves nothing at all)
My response：Your mouthful poo must be peed by someone from Beijing of the People's Republic of China, you only deserve to poo all your shit in Beijing to those who have peed in your mouth.
----March 3rd, 2018
你嘈着要你妈，我送你一个愿意当的 (你自己亲妈可是什么都不配)。
我的回应：在你嘴里撒尿的那个烂屌应该是中华人民共和国北京的，你就只配在中国北京喷你那一嘴狗屎。
----2018年3月3日。
在中华人民共和国大学毕业的应该意味着社么？
我的回应：中华人民共和国北京中央政府2015年-2017通过广播剧用中文及广播剧所播放国家的当地语言，向全世界正式宣布并强调：
1：中华人民共和国根本就没人要操方敏的逼眼，中华人民共和国永远不会需要方敏的任何才华。
2：中国政府最高权力机构中共中央政治局有多人和李克强总理的妻子程虹是事实上的真实男女交媾两性关系，所以程虹才是真正可以领导中华人民共和国经济发展的杰出人才。
3：中华人民共和国根本就没人要操方敏的逼眼，方敏就没有可能对中华人民共和国有过任何贡献，性交功能之内或者之外，方敏都是就只能是个假冒伪造。
4：中华人民共和国李克强总理的妻子程虹为中国政府最高权力机构中共中央多人育有现已成年儿子（海外传言每人一个，共6人，据说广播剧已由各男本人（中国现任高层官员）分别宣布3-4男共妻事实），所以中华人民共和国李克强总理的妻子程虹为防止中华人民共和国断子绝孙国家灭亡的所做杰出贡献绝不可以轻视。
----2018年3月3日。
12-28-2018 Anger of "How you can claim you still own a business after you announced you would giving somebody some business?" -- 基金(会)就是一个可以让你要钱要东西实现梦想的地方啊。
These freak you out true anger (那些能够吓死你的真实的愤怒）
You already give me business, why you say that Fund is your business？
你已经说了要给我一些生意，为什么你还到处说你自己才是那个基金的老板？
You inherited that Fund? How much you can give me? Why don't I have a share? How dare you just don't give me money?
你继承那个基金啦，那你可以给我多少钱啊？我为什么没钱，你凭什么就是不给我钱？
That company is your investment, then you are its investor, but why you say you own that company?
那家公司是你投资的啊，那你也就是那个公司的投资人，可你为什么说你是那个公司的主家（东家）?
You said you would give me some investment share, then why you deny I own this much share, what do you mean I need to buy this much share?
你说你会给我一些投资份额，那你为什么不承认我已经拥有的这些份额？你凭什么要让我掏钱来买这些份额？
----February 28th, 2018
What I have inherited are trusts that my birth grandfathers set up for me before I was born.
My name (Min Fang) is in my trust (Example Name: XYZ), this trust XYZ has invested a company ABC, this company ABC only has the trust XYZ as the name of its investor in its capital account (owner's account which means company ABC's owner is the trust XYZ). The company ABC further invested a company ABC-1, the company ABC-1 only has the company ABC as its investor in its capital account which means ABC-1's owner is the company ABC, etc. that there are these company ABC-1-1, company ABC-1-1-1, company ABC-1-1-1-1, etc.
My named account (Min Fang) is only in my trust XYZ, but my providing can be paid by the company ABC-1-1-1-1 that later deducted from the company ABC-1-1-1's profiting share, and subsequently deducted from company ABC-1-1, company ABC-1, company ABC, and then deducted from my named capital account ( Min Fang's capital account) in my trust XYZ.
Another way to get my providing is to let my trust wire that money directly to me which is seldom used by investors because of inconvenience caused by tedious procedures. Also, the Investor's tax for each providing check is paid to the country according to its signing local company's geographic location.
Another way to get my providing is to let my trust wire that money directly to me which is seldom used by investors because of inconvenience caused by tedious procedures. Also, the Investor's tax for each providing check is paid to the country according to its signing local company's geographic location.
----February 27th, 2018
The anger is the confusion of the specific & the generic term of "Business".
My response: If you hear the angry reply of "You never give me any business, you still claiming yourself owning it" when the other one said, "Why you are so angry as if I owe you after I gave you all the business I could give you?"
You would know this anger is the confusion of the specific & the generic term of "Business".
There was something more because of this changing attorney on July 1st of 2004. Somehow, Albert Gore got this impression that I asked his father's attorney firm to be the attorney for the job that lady had quitted should mean that I was willing to give him that Fund. I heard later the attorney fee was $100 Million a year or so, how my offering of two attorney positions could possibly mean that I was giving out a Fund that is $200 Billion size in 2004? It was clarified in front of everyone that was a participant in that chat at that moment already that I was only offering an attorney position to Albert Gore's father's law firm when Albert Gore kept asking confirmation of giving. But somehow since then, Albert Gore has this determination to take over my money as if I owe him.
----published on February 27th, 2018
You said you would give me some investment share, then why you deny I own this much share, what do you mean I need to buy this much share?
你说你会给我一些投资份额，那你为什么不承认我已经拥有的这些份额？你凭什么要让我掏钱来买这些份额？
In the meeting on July 1st of 2004, there were some talks of giving out investment share which only means reserved investment share for these "privileged" to buy because all the discussion was about how to let salary-recipient can pay for these investment shares through their 401K retirement plan.
----February 28th, 2018
In Chinese community, the anger is from the confusion of the same Chinese translation of "Fund" and "Foundation", "Fund" is "基金“， "Foundation" is ”基金会“ while "会” means a gathering place in the Chinese language.
The anger in Chinese community is the misunderstanding that a "Fund" is equal to a "Foundation" which means a place to demand to fulfill all desires or all wishes or all dreams.
----February 28th, 2018
02-27-2018 Why everyone so deserves to get my money as if owe? -- 老爸爸，请去美领馆证实妈妈是或否已在美国并和我取得联系
Heard about this morning's talk about the U.S. Consulates‘ help on searching my missing father.
My response: I truly and truly appreciate and in desperate need of this help.
老爸爸方文海：你要是听到了今天早上的广播的话，请赶紧和美国领事馆联系(任何地方的美领馆），不用担心你是否有有效证件证明身份，他们可以做DNA鉴定来确定你和我的亲生父女关系的。如果老爸爸你因为自己的亲身经历，想在国内找找妈妈王博贤的消息，也最好是在和美国领事馆核实妈妈是否已经在美国之后，或者至少和我方敏取得联系之后，再一起商量商量如何找妈妈并和妈妈取得联系。
----February 27th, 2018
听说了我很喜欢的中国最著名的女作家张爱玲居然知道我给生出来了。
我详细说：我是六十年代出生的，张爱玲是1994年在纽约去世的。我昨天听说海外有很多认识张爱玲的人都从她那儿听说过“方智仁的那个孙女居然给养出来了。”
我特别相信这是真实，因为这口气就是在说一个年轻时旧识的新闻。上海滩当时很多人都知道方家等我这个大小姐真是等了很多很多年哎，我实在是太幸福了。
----2018年2月27日。
Why there is so much hostility about my inheriting?
My response: I have asked this question for a long time and I can provide a little what I have realized.
On the day I entrusted I just inherited wealth (July 1st of 2004), I got a very friendly hello from a lady attorney that triggered the huge anger that had accumulated in me since my inheriting.
I was once contacted by this lady attorney in 1999 or early 2000 that if I need sponsorship of my green card. I did not know who she is was the reason I "rejected offer" by saying the company I was working for would sponsor me.
When I heard that hello from this lady attorney, I was remembering all the tears I shed for that "office romance" and I had this grudge of "where was she when I was crying?", so I refused to hear anything but determined to change attorney who had "neglected" me. Here, I am sincerely apologizing to that lady attorney again.
I did not know she was not the attorney representing my trust or me, and she possibly did not know why I should not blame her for my tears as well were the reasons she "decided" to quit her job. It caused a lot of controversy and confusion in the Fund later that how I could possibly have replaced her.
There was something more because of this changing attorney. Somehow, Albert Gore got this impression that I asked his father's attorney firm to be the attorney for the job that lady had quitted should mean that I was willing to give him that Fund. I heard later the attorney fee was $100 Million a year or so, how my offering of two attorney positions could possibly mean that I was giving out a Fund that is $200 Billion size in 2004? It was clarified in front of everyone that was a participant in that chat at that moment already that I was only offering an attorney position to Albert Gore's father's law firm when Albert Gore kept asking confirmation of giving. But somehow since then, Albert Gore has this determination to take over my money as if I owe him.
----February 27th, 2018
02-26-2018
02-21-2018 Two different Accounts & Who has a personal first-last named capital account everywhere?
02-08-2018 Two different Accounts
My response: I got into the fight with O'Connors about who owns that American Fund. If my providing has not been taken by some O'Connors as rumored, I have no reason to get into this fight. The rumored providing paid for my living cost in 2016 was paid expense from its British parent fund's (owner's) equity account as instructed by its British parent fund. Theirs is from local American Fund's operating expense.
----February 8th, 2018
This American Fund's British Parent Fund is owned by the same French Fund that owns the British East India Company Financier.
----February 11th, 2018
This above accounts issue is also the issue between some Pejoves names in the U.S with me by rumor. My providing, by rumor, that a Miss Pejoves took is from a Ford's Holding investor Fund's British parent Fund's French grandparents Fund's Capital Account. Their agreed-upon providing is from their shared account with their British relatives as operating expenses in the British Fund which is the parent fund of this local American fund, so the American Pejoves' agreed-upon providing is booked in local American Fund's British Parent's Fund's capital account in the U.S that would be deducted as operating expense in Britain together with British Pejoves.
----February 21st, 2018
In the U.S, my providing and theirs providing both deducted from local American Fund's parent British Fund's capital account.
But in Britain, my providing is paid by the British Fund's parent French Fund so that my providing is deducted from the British Fund's parent French Fund's Capital Account, and theirs is deducted from the local British Fund's operating expense accounts.
But in Britain, my providing is paid by the British Fund's parent French Fund so that my providing is deducted from the British Fund's parent French Fund's Capital Account, and theirs is deducted from the local British Fund's operating expense accounts.
Conclusion: Their providing is paid by the British Fund, My providing is paid by the British Fund's parent French Fund. Nothing to do with each other.
----February 27th, 2018
My name (Min Fang) is in my trust (Name: XYZ), this trust XYZ has invested a company ABC, this company ABC only has the trust XYZ as the name of its investor in its capital account (owner's account which means company ABC's owner is the trust XYZ). The company ABC further invested a company CDE, the company CDE only has the company ABC as its investor in its capital account which means CDE's owner is the company ABC, etc. My named account (Min Fang) is only in my trust XYZ, but my providing can be paid by the company CDE that later deducted from the company ABC's profiting share, and subsequently deducted from my trust XYZ's profiting share, and then deducted from my account ( Min Fang's account).
----February 27th, 2018
Albert Gore has nothing to do with me for him to say anything on any matter. And I refuse to let Albert Gore have any saying over my any matter. Please contact 911 police if he insists on you to listen to his saying about my matter which certainly would put you into legal troubles, or call his psychiatrist daughter or any psychiatrist about his severe illusion that he can have any saying over my any matter. He is probably having some sever psychiatry medical situation called Delusional disorder if he indeed just won't stop insisting on having saying over not-his-to-say my any matter, please call 911 or the psychiatrist daughter who will certainly help Albert Gore.
----February 1st, 2018
This above item certainly applicable to everyone who has so publicly/privately announced "having nothing to do with" me. I have no recommendation of a psychiatrist but 911 would be the number that you can try if you are in the situation of being the subject of those "insist-on" from those announcers who ask you to do what they are insist-on telling you to do over any of my matter.
----February 21st, 2018
Compare to most of those who insist on having a saying on the radio to shit my name, at least, I have my capital accounts in my trusts that is in this investing chain to claim myself an investor of the radio company.
If my name is not listed as the capital account's name is the reason I have no saying over this radio program producing, so is every one of those almighty prominent persons who insist on to shit me on the radio. This is precisely the reason I sent them to courts, criminal or civil.
The rumored implanting cancer is not concerning since most of the cancers can be treated or even cured completely nowadays. Rumored cancer implanting is a mechanism to simulate cancer's formation from healthy cells which means it is a very early stage in cancer formation that defects healthy cells. It is well-known that modern cancer diagnosis is the mechanism of recognizing those defected cells. The treatment mechanism, I assume, can be simple as remove those defected cells upon its discovery. This treatment mechanism is already available nowadays.
----February 14th, 2018
Rumored the reason I should not be acknowledged as the Creator of Beijing Olympic Opening is that if FBI did not record, then my creative ideas won't be produced.
My response: This is a true statement that obviously and definitely would results in Beijing Olympic Game opening would never be presented as it was.
The 2008 Beijing Olympic Game Opening is what it was is because that is produced by my creative ideas. The creator of 2008 Beijing Olympic Opening is Min Fang is a matter of fact that no decent lawful person can deny, not to mention those claimed talented enough to lead a Nation. The opportunity to lead a Nation to serve the people is not the same meaning of being the driving force to violate laws to rob the people. I am an individual and this is my individual case but I won't be the only individual as part of the people's definition that being robbed if government official position means the power to perform the robbery to the people.
-----February 10th, 2018
听说了我不应该被承认是北京奥运会创意的原因是如果当时没有被FBI所录影，也就不会有我这份创意。
我的回应：如果这样也就明确一定会造成北京2008奥运会开闭幕式就永远都不会是2008年北京奥运会所向世界呈现的那份制作。
2008年北京奥运会开闭幕式之所以会被制作成2008年时中国向全世界所呈现的那样，就是因为北京2008年奥运会开闭式是采用了我的创意。我方敏是2008北京奥运会开闭幕式的创意是没有任何一个遵纪守法有良知责任的人所能够抵赖的，更不用说那些号称有才华可以领导一个国家的人。能够领导一个国家可以为人民服务的机会绝不应该意味着可以用政府的权利带头破坏法律掠夺老百姓。我是一个个体，这事是牵涉到我的一个个别案例，如果政府职权就只意味着掠夺百姓的便利权利。我方敏绝不会是人民这个定义中唯一被掠夺的一个老百姓。
-----2018年2月10日。
02-25-2018 About Zhu's Family's Heir and My Own Fertility.
Heard this morning's talk about Ling, Jihua's son（令计划的儿子）.
My response: I heard there was a car accident as widely rumored abroad, but the victims of that car accident were all actress or actor from the entertainment industry, not from political related. This car accident has nothing to do with me.
Ling, Jihua is not the crown prince of the ancient Zhu's family from Chinese Ming dynasty. His last name was changed from Zhu when his family line is out of 5-cousin with Crown Prince.
I had some hostile conversation about this Chinese Zhu's family because I took them as a bad gang like family. I was corrected and I have no hostility at all against the crown prince of the Chinese Zhu's family.
06-13-2017 (3) 澄清有关令计划的传言
----February 25th, 2018
Heard this morning's talk about the real heir of the same Chinese Zhu's family.
My response: I heard that "that was the rumor not corrected yet" was said by Fang, Zhiqiang（方志强）, the once featured possible heir of the Zhu's family. He has the same last name with me, but no blood association.
I heard the reason China is promoting this "son's line " is that this person is willing to take over my wealth.
I heard the Zhu's Crown Prince, last named Chen, has Zhu's family wealth as his inheritable (*it is his mother's wealth currently), but the "son's line" does not have any inherited wealth. According to rumored stories I heard, the "son's line" is from the youngest child(son) when Chinese Zhu's family's inheriting rule changed to firstborn instead of the firstborn son which certainly made this "son's line" a denounced one. I heard the youngest child(son) and his mother only got coverage of living cost but not the family wealth at the time when the father passed away.
I heard a lot of rumors how the "son's line" is determined to take over my wealth. I have to declare if he relies on his ancient family to violate laws, I also have my own ancient family to protect me by laws. I heard Chinese Zhu's family has a lot of people live abroad now, they can verify all these rumors I heard of to know who is the real heir of their own ancient Chinese Zhu's family.
*I also heard rumors that they were informed of having their inherited wealth in 2006 which was not at the time when the family senior (grandparent) passed away, and their inherited wealth is not some sort of trust. And I heard they have no access to spend that informed inherited wealth. I did not hear who informed them.
----February 25th, 2018
Heard this morning's talk about Chinese "Stamped heir" participated in the same meeting on June 30th of 2004.
My response: I have no idea if he was in any of June 30th of 2004's meetings or which attorney/accountant group & wealth he was having the meeting with. My inheriting on June 30th of 2004 and my inherited wealth has nothing to do with this person's participating in any meeting on June 30th of 2004.
I was having my inheriting meeting with attorneys representing trusts that my biological grandfathers set up especially for me as the family heir birthmark-heir daughter of my biological father Fang, Wenhai(方文海) who is the family heir-birthmark heir from the family heir birthmark line. I was informed to attend my inheriting meeting by the attorneys representing those trusts that my biological grandfathers set up for me. *I was informed by my green card application attorney who was my representing attorney that was informed to have the inheriting meeting by a female case-attorney on inheriting meeting matter representing those attorneys representing trusts that my biological grandfathers set up for me.
I did hear he was informed by a Chinese Foreign Department diplomat. I do not know if he shares any grandfather with me biologically. By DNA test, he has only about 70% chance to share a grandfather. By DNA science, the DNA test result will be similar even if he shares a grandfather with me biologically which means it is not identifiable if he shares any grandfather with me biologically.
02-23-2018 Why I say "According to laws, no one is eligible to challenge my inheriting."?
----February 25th, 2018
Heard this morning's talk about my childbirth.
My response: Other than malicious cursing to express hate, it means nothing at all.
I already inherited all the trusts that set up for me and I reject any donation of all kinds of pig-borne in human format but just a true moron in any format.
*pig-born in human format but just a true moron is the term I use to address those who born from a known-birth-womb but don't know who the mother should be since that birth-womb is a creature pig's womb, must have been.
---February 25th, 2018
This morning's talk may be sparked by a conversation in glass house cancer.
My response: It was in 2008-2009 when I still lived in Somerville, MA.
I woke up from my dream during a still-on conversation. What I remembered was there were some male asking for the confirmation if the request to have Ovariectomy(卵巢切除) could be sincere, and a female's voice continuing to give the answer "yes, because of the concern for ovarian cancer."
I do not know who that female was but the voice was from my throat area. I kept quiet about it since cancer talk did sound concerning. But I was never asked legally valid if I intend to do any ovarian surgery, and there was never such a surgery ever performed in-hospital or remotely.(从未做过在医院或者远程的卵巢（切除）手术）
And I say to anyone who is so confident to harm me remotely through technology, that this threat won't worth my concern but will be that person's own price to pay permanently on that person self as well as all of that person's own next generation via the exact same remote method.
----February 25th, 2018
02-18-2018 All About Fertility Related (都是有关生小孩的）
02-06-2018 为什么说我是的钱以及我能做的一些解释
Heard "Next Kin" inheriting law is the reason for current radio program's producing effort.
My response:
I, Min Fang, refuse to let any of my lawful wealth to go to (or owned by) any next kin of mine.
I, Min Fang, refuse to let any of my lawful wealth go to (or owned by) anyone who has publicly and/or privately announced deservedness or intends to announce deservedness publicly and/or privately.
I, Min Fang, refuse to let any of my lawful wealth to go to (or owned by) anyone who has committed/participated or intend to commit/participate murder and/ or hate-crime that intended(intend) to make me a victim of.
I, Min Fang, refuse to let any of my lawful wealth to become No-Owner wealth through intentionally spread hate crime that targets me in order to make my lawful wealth a no-owner wealth.
I, Min Fang, refuse to let any of my lawful wealth to go to any charity without my clear instruction.
I, Min Fang, refuse to let any of my lawful wealth to be owned by any organization or any charity as well as any government.
I, Min Fang, refuse to let any of my privately owned lawful wealth to become any format of public wealth through any criminal effort.
I, Min Fang, refuse to consider to let any of my privately solely owned lawful wealth to be owned by any other patron(s) and/or any organization and/or any government and/or generic(specific) public in any format.
(*The pressure of writing this to save my own life was the reason I started to send letters to FBI in January of 2015).
----published on February 1st, 2018
02-23-2018 Why I say "According to laws, no one is eligible to challenge my inheriting."?
Why I say "According to laws, no one is eligible to challenge my inheriting."?(中文附后）
My explanation:
The entrusting person(my grandfather) of the trust specified the sole qualified beneficiary person of his entrusted wealth is the entrusting person's (my grandfather) biological grandaughter who has family inheriting birthmark and born from a grandson of the family inheriting birthmark line with the identical family inheriting birthmark.
This means that according to entrusting and inheriting related laws:
1: If you are not a female, you are not eligible to challenge the inheriting of the trust.
2: Further, if you have no factual evidence of the biological grandfather-granddaughter relationship with the entrusting person(my grandfather), you are not eligible to challenge the inheriting of the trust.
3: Further, if you are not the biological daughter of entrusting person's family inheriting birthmark line's grandson Fang, Wenhai(方文海), you are not eligible to challenge the inheriting of the trust.
4: Further, if you are not the biological daughter of Fang, Wenhai who has the identical family inheriting birthmark as Fang, Wenhai's, you are not eligible to challenge the inheriting of the trust.
I am my father Fang, Wenhai's one and only biological daughter,
My father Fang, Wenhai is the grandson of the entrusting person's family inheriting birthmark line with factual evidence as part of the entrusting document in entrusting records.
I have identical family inheriting birthmark as my father Fang, Wenhai's that has been verified when I was born.
Conclusion:
1: According to laws, no one is eligible to challenge my inheriting.
2: A very simple inheriting case, indeed.
----February 23rd, 2018
Heard this morning's talk about why a rich person would need to get cash from an investment.
My response:
I was once in an emergency similar situation when I was locked out of my newly moved-in apartment. I did not even have a penny or a photo ID with me, and the neighbor I asked for help doubted if I was the resident of the apartment I asked his help to open.
I heard it is a common understanding that it would be understood as impersonating with a forged ID if a rich person goes into a small investment(a coffee shop) to borrow a $20 bill in an emergency situation.
I say I would go ask where I can find a police officer because that is an emergency I am possibly in and I am in need of some help, either help of making a phone call on my behave to ask some cash to be sent over, or to help me more on my possible situation, a police officer is the most appropriate person to help me out in this kind situation.
----February 23rd, 2018
Some said if a cousin of mine can make such a phone call to me to demand cash to be sent over if in an emergency?
My response: First of all, none of my cousins share my inherited wealth. I am the sole beneficiary person of all those trusts I inherited. Those trusts I inherited were specially set up for me by my birth grandfathers before I was born. All my birth grandfathers had passed away before I was born. Mine inheriting in 2004 was not associated with any family senior's death. My inheriting was not family wealth inheriting but trusts inheriting.
Second, I do not know who this cousin can call to make such a request, and I am certainly won't answer this kind of calls from everyone of all my cousins. In China or in America, it would be the same person or same group of persons that this cousin can call to make the same or similar request.
----February 23rd, 2018
为什么我说"根据法律，没有人够资格质询我继承财产的合法性"?
我的解释：信托基金的托付人（我爷爷）指定信托基金这笔财富的唯一受益人必须是信托基金的托付人（我爷爷）的亲生孙女，这个亲生孙女必须是信托基金托付人（我爷爷)的家族继承胎记掌纹儿孙这一支生出来的，而且必须有信托基金托付人的家族继承胎记掌纹。
这个意思就是，按照信托和继承相关的法律法规：
1：如果你不是个女的，你就不够资格质询这个信托基金的继承是否合法。
2：进一步，如果你没有事实依据来证明你是这个信托基金的托付人的亲生孙女，你就不够资格质询这个信托基金的继承是否合法。（我爷爷）
3：进一步，如果你不是这个信托基金的托付人（我爷爷）的家族继承胎记掌纹儿子的这支所出且有家族继承胎记掌纹的孙子方文海的亲生女儿，你就不够资格质询这个信托基金的继承是否合法。
4：进一步，如果你不是方文海的有着和方文海一摸一样的家族胎记掌纹的亲生女儿，你就不够资格质询这个信托基金的继承是否合法。
我是我父亲方文海唯一的亲生女儿。
我父亲方文海是信托基金托付人的家族胎记掌纹这一支的有家族胎记掌纹的孙子，这事实证据是在信托文件里作为记录存档的。
我有和我父亲方文海一摸一样的家族胎记掌纹是在我出生的时候就已经证实了的。
结论：
1：根据法律，没有人够资格质询我继承财产的合法性。
2：这其实是一个非常简单而且很单纯的信托继承。
----2018年2月23日。
02-22-2018
Heard this morning's talk about why I should be the sole beneficiary person of my grandfathers' trusts.
My response: I am the person who inherited trusts that my grandfathers set up for me as a sole beneficiary person is according to each one of those entrusting grandfathers' clearly expressed will.
I am the sole owner of my own inherited wealth is according to my own will.
I can inherit all these trusts after all these years is according to laws.
I can keep all these trusts as my own wealth is according to my own wish.
According to laws, no one is eligible to challenge my inheriting.
According to laws, no one can harass me to demand to have a share of my inherited wealth.
I am not willing to be harassed regarding why I am the sole beneficiary person of those trusts I inherited.
----February 22nd, 2018
Heard this morning's talk about China.
My response: Being part of Chinese who already migrated to another country's life, I agree it is important to let 1.3 Billion people in the People's Republic of China hear our doubts, and I think it should be solely 1.3 Billion people in the People's Republic of China's privileges to make any decision regarding what eligible whom to lead the People's Republic of China and to take care of the piece of land we call our root.
----February 22nd, 2018
About the concerns and doubts if I can have the health to enjoy my inherited wealth.
The rumored dynamic infection with food consumption is not concerning. The treatment technology to remove dynamic infection's food-leaking & redirecting mechanism has been available. I have no concern of all these rumors possible impacts to my health.
----February 22nd, 2018
The rumored implanting cancer is not concerning since most of the cancers can be treated or even cured completely nowadays. Rumored cancer implanting is a mechanism to simulate cancer's formation from healthy cells which means it is a very early stage in cancer formation that defects healthy cells. It is well-known that modern cancer diagnosis is the mechanism of recognizing those defected cells. The treatment mechanism, I assume, can be simple as remove those defected cells upon its discovery. This treatment mechanism is already available nowadays.
----February 14th, 2018
*HIV new treatment technology is similar to this.
----published on Nov. 7th, 2017
听说了今天早上所提到的为什么我是我爷爷们所设立的所有信托基金的唯一受益人。
我的回应：我继承的信托基金都是我爷爷们为我设立的，我是这些信托基金唯一的受益人是根据每一个为我设立了信托的我爷爷们自己所清楚明确表达的意愿。
我是我自己所继承财产的唯一主人是根据我自己的意愿。
我可以在这么多年后还能继承这些为我设立的信托基金是根据法律。
我可以继续将这些信托作为我自己的财产保留是根据我自己的意愿。
根据法律，没有人够资格质询我继承财产的合法性。
根据法律，没有人可以骚扰我要求瓜分我所继承的财产。
我本人不愿意被任何人骚扰质询有关为什么我是这些信托基金的唯一受益人的相关问题。
----2018年2月22日。
听说了今天早上所提到的有关中国的话题。
我的回应：做为已经移居海外并且已经融入另外一个国家生活的海外华侨中的一个，我同意让那些在中华人民共和国生活的13亿中国人民知道我们这些海外华人对中国政治的质疑是非常重要的，我同时也认为只有中华人民共和国的13亿人民才有资格决定究竟应该是什么样资历的人凭什么样的资格才可以领导中华人民共和国以及管理那一片我们称之为“我们的祖国“的土地。
----2018年2月22日。
有关我是不是有可能有一份健康来享受我所继承的财富。
有关只要吃东西就会自动被感染的传言不是那么令人担心。去除造成自动感染的食物从消化道泄露及转移机制的治疗技术一直都有。我从未担心这些传言对我健康的影响。
----2018年2月·122日。
传言中的癌症移植没那么吓人，这年头，绝大多数的癌症都是可以治疗的，很多都已经可以彻底痊愈了。传言中的癌症移植就是根据癌症形成的病理机制，模拟如何从人体健康细胞来人为形成这种那种癌症的一种诱发早期癌症形成的机制。众所周知，现代医学对于癌症的诊断就是依据对于这些病变后细胞的正确识别。至于治疗吗，我估计也就是一旦发现就尽快去除这些病变后的细胞。如今这种治疗机制已经开始用于那些自然形成的癌症的治疗了。
----发布于2018年2月14日。
*HIV new treatment technology is similar to this.
----published on Nov. 7th, 2017
02-21-2018 Two different Accounts & Who has a personal first-last named capital account everywhere?
02-08-2018 Two different Accounts
My response: I got into the fight with O'Connors about who owns that American Fund. If my providing has not been taken by some O'Connors as rumored, I have no reason to get into this fight. The rumored providing paid for my living cost in 2016 was paid expense from its British parent fund's (owner's) equity account as instructed by its British parent fund. Theirs is from local American Fund's operating expense.
----February 8th, 2018
This American Fund's British Parent Fund is owned by the same French Fund that owns the British East India Company Financier.
----February 11th, 2018
This above accounts issue is also the issue between some Pejoves names in the U.S with me by rumor. My providing, by rumor, that a Miss Pejoves took is from a Ford's Holding investor Fund's British parent Fund's French grandparents Fund's Capital Account. Their agreed-upon providing is from their shared account with their British relatives as operating expenses in the British Fund which is the parent fund of this local American fund, so the American Pejoves' agreed-upon providing is booked in local American Fund's British Parent's Fund's capital account in the U.S that would be deducted as operating expense in Britain together with British Pejoves.
----February 21st, 2018
Albert Gore has nothing to do with me for him to say anything on any matter. And I refuse to let Albert Gore have any saying over my any matter. Please contact 911 police if he insists on you to listen to his saying about my matter which certainly would put you into legal troubles, or call his psychiatrist daughter or any psychiatrist about his severe illusion that he can have any saying over my any matter. He is probably having some sever psychiatry medical situation called Delusional disorder if he indeed just won't stop insisting on having saying over not-his-to-say my any matter, please call 911 or the psychiatrist daughter who will certainly help Albert Gore.
----February 1st, 2018
This above item certainly applicable to everyone who has so publicly/privately announced "having nothing to do with" me. I have no recommendation of a psychiatrist but 911 would be the number that you can try if you are in the situation of being the subject of those "insist-on" from those announcers who ask you to do what they are insist-on telling you to do over any of my matter.
----February 21st, 2018
Compare to most of those who insist on having a saying on the radio to shit my name, at least, I have my capital accounts in my trusts that is in this investing chain to claim myself an investor of the radio company.
If my name is not listed as the capital account's name is the reason I have no saying over this radio program producing, so is every one of those almighty prominent persons who insist on to shit me on the radio. This is precisely the reason I sent them to courts, criminal or civil.
The rumored implanting cancer is not concerning since most of the cancers can be treated or even cured completely nowadays. Rumored cancer implanting is a mechanism to simulate cancer's formation from healthy cells which means it is a very early stage in cancer formation that defects healthy cells. It is well-known that modern cancer diagnosis is the mechanism of recognizing those defected cells. The treatment mechanism, I assume, can be simple as remove those defected cells upon its discovery. This treatment mechanism is already available nowadays.
----February 14th, 2018
Rumored the reason I should not be acknowledged as the Creator of Beijing Olympic Opening is that if FBI did not record, then my creative ideas won't be produced.
My response: This is a true statement that obviously and definitely would results in Beijing Olympic Game opening would never be presented as it was.
The 2008 Beijing Olympic Game Opening is what it was is because that is produced by my creative ideas. The creator of 2008 Beijing Olympic Opening is Min Fang is a matter of fact that no decent lawful person can deny, not to mention those claimed talented enough to lead a Nation. The opportunity to lead a Nation to serve the people is not the same meaning of being the driving force to violate laws to rob the people. I am an individual and this is my individual case but I won't be the only individual as part of the people's definition that being robbed if government official position means the power to perform the robbery to the people.
-----February 10th, 2018
听说了我不应该被承认是北京奥运会创意的原因是如果当时没有被FBI所录影，也就不会有我这份创意。
我的回应：如果这样也就明确一定会造成北京2008奥运会开闭幕式就永远都不会是2008年北京奥运会所向世界呈现的那份制作。
2008年北京奥运会开闭幕式之所以会被制作成2008年时中国向全世界所呈现的那样，就是因为北京2008年奥运会开闭式是采用了我的创意。我方敏是2008北京奥运会开闭幕式的创意是没有任何一个遵纪守法有良知责任的人所能够抵赖的，更不用说那些号称有才华可以领导一个国家的人。能够领导一个国家可以为人民服务的机会绝不应该意味着可以用政府的权利带头破坏法律掠夺老百姓。我是一个个体，这事是牵涉到我的一个个别案例，如果政府职权就只意味着掠夺百姓的便利权利。我方敏绝不会是人民这个定义中唯一被掠夺的一个老百姓。
-----2018年2月10日。
02-20-2018 Well, Is it a charity or a deservedness to have an own blood
Heard this morning's broadcasting of "why don't you get that HE is the person really supports the wife".
My response: Why don't you get the fact I am much wealthier than him. Please notice the capital "I" and the lowercase "him" according to the English grammar.
I am the wealthiest heiress ever. I do have my own great and great which is a lot of "great" prefix that is so well-deserved birth grandfathers.
----February 20th, 2018
Well, Is it a charity or a deservedness to have an own blood?
My response: I do not have any child (children) with anyone featured in this morning's radio broadcasting is a true statement.
I do have the obligation to express myself that I have nothing to do with that those him with the same level of "paying attention to the necessity of expressing publicly the fact of really having nothing to do" for my future young and handsome who possibly already paying attention to the medical treatment progress of my appearance. So, let me have a start as:
Be alert: according to the rumor, this morning's featured wives are all truly well-known to the husbands' society because they were all once very expensive and famous prostitutes in Las Vegas who get paid to open legs to all riches that can afford to pay their expensive prices.
This rumor may actually be convincing to everyone who ever doubted why they are only acknowledged as "a longtime girlfriend" for years till this recent public proud announcements as if there are some secrets need to hide, as well as all those "the price proves the goodness" logic &"mother-fxxxer" titles. This rumor may just be the secret and reason of the proud of shared or even inherited Connoisseur level of knowledge and capability.
As long as this wife is what he truly deserved, I love to spread this rumor to tell everyone who he truly deserves.
Well, the answer to the question "Is it a charity or a deservedness to have an own blood" depends on who he really is for both scenario, so, I let the reader of this blog decide what it is based on their own knowledge of who he truly is. I just don't understand why Tina O'Connor can be so willing to sacrifice herself to be a Pathetic Psycho on this blog.
02-14-2018 This morning's Proud of "Well Deserved Giving-only Promised Share Forever Romance"
----February 20th, 2018
02-19-2018 Two different Accounts & A Chinese Jennie from Ford Foundation believed Ford name is a beggar's name
Heard this morning's broadcasting of Beggar Ford.
My response: Heard that is a Chinese Jeannie from Ford Foundation's joke about who the Ford name truly is.
-----February 19th, 2018
02-08-2018 Two different Accounts
My response: I got into the fight with O'Connors about who owns that American Fund. If my providing has not been taken by some O'Connors as rumored, I have no reason to get into this fight. The rumored providing paid for my living cost in 2016 was paid expense from its British parent fund's (owner's) equity account as instructed by its British parent fund. Theirs is from local American Fund's operating expense.
----February 8th, 2018
This American Fund's British Parent Fund is owned by the same French Fund that owns the British East India Company Financier.
----February 11th, 2018
Albert Gore has nothing to do with me for him to say anything on any matter. And I refuse to let Albert Gore have any saying over my any matter. Please contact 911 police if he insists on you to listen to his saying about my matter which certainly would put you into legal troubles, or call his psychiatrist daughter or any psychiatrist about his severe illusion that he can have any saying over my any matter. He is probably having some sever psychiatry medical situation called Delusional disorder if he indeed just won't stop insisting on having saying over not-his-to-say my any matter, please call 911 or the psychiatrist daughter who will certainly help Albert Gore.
----February 1st, 2018
Compare to most of those who insist on having a saying on the radio to shit my name, at least, I have my capital accounts in my trusts that is in this investing chain to claim myself an investor of the radio company.
If my name is not listed as the capital account's name is the reason I have no saying over this radio program producing, so is every one of those almighty prominent persons who insist on to shit me on the radio. This is precisely the reason I sent them to courts, criminal or civil.
The rumored implanting cancer is not concerning since most of the cancers can be treated or even cured completely nowadays. Rumored cancer implanting is a mechanism to simulate cancer's formation from healthy cells which means it is a very early stage in cancer formation that defects healthy cells. It is well-known that modern cancer diagnosis is the mechanism of recognizing those defected cells. The treatment mechanism, I assume, can be simple as remove those defected cells upon its discovery. This treatment mechanism is already available nowadays.
----February 14th, 2018
Rumored the reason I should not be acknowledged as the Creator of Beijing Olympic Opening is that if FBI did not record, then my creative ideas won't be produced.
My response: This is a true statement that obviously and definitely would results in Beijing Olympic Game Opening Ceremony would never be presented as it was.
The 2008 Beijing Olympic Game Opening Ceremony is what it was is because that is produced from my creative ideas. The creator of 2008 Beijing Olympic Opening Ceremony is Min Fang is a matter of fact that no decent lawful person can deny, not to mention those claimed talented enough to lead a Nation. The opportunity to lead a Nation to serve the people is not the same meaning of being the driving force to violate laws to rob the people. I am an individual and this is my individual case but I won't be the only individual as part of the people's definition that being robbed if government official position means the power to perform the robbery to the people.
-----February 10th, 2018
听说了我不应该被承认是北京奥运会创意的原因是如果当时没有被FBI所录影，也就不会有我这份创意。
我的回应：如果这样也就明确一定会造成北京2008奥运会开闭幕式就永远都不会是2008年北京奥运会所向世界呈现的那份制作。
2008年北京奥运会开闭幕式之所以会被制作成2008年时中国向全世界所呈现的那样，就是因为北京2008年奥运会开闭式是采用了我的创意。我方敏是2008北京奥运会开闭幕式的创意是没有任何一个遵纪守法有良知责任的人所能够抵赖的，更不用说那些号称有才华可以领导一个国家的人。能够领导一个国家可以为人民服务的机会绝不应该意味着可以用政府的权利带头破坏法律掠夺老百姓。我是一个个体，这事是牵涉到我的一个个别案例，如果政府职权就只意味着掠夺百姓的便利权利。我方敏绝不会是人民这个定义中唯一被掠夺的一个老百姓。
-----2018年2月10日。
02-18-2018 All About Fertility Related (都是有关生小孩的）
Heard this morning's talk about "why do you need to have your own biological child".（中文附后）
My response: I heard it was a first cousin from my father side who possibly expecting to be a "Next Kin". I already refused to let my wealth to be owned by any next kin of mine.
I repeat what I said in the morning for whoever has this understanding even if this is indeed from a cousin: "I can watch your biological child or biological children get burned to death without my eyes blinking because I do have my own biological children already. It is from the same understanding that I don't think you need to have your own biological child at all."
----February 18th, 2018
Heard this morning's confusion expressed "Who is going to father your biological child since all those old have already publicly denounced you?"
My response: I can choose the excellent handsome juicy young man from those who expect to share easy luxury life with me happily. I got very handsome blessing from my own birth grandfathers and a fertility-specific blessing from a birth grandmother of mine. I am happy and I don't mind to share a happy luxury life with a great young man even if that means much younger man.
I can totally envision my young and handsome with all our children cheering our securities marching in my own designed uniforms from our private balcony. Well, I do have tons of Imperial titles from my own birth Imperial grandfathers that I inherited together with the financial blessing.
I am a female but I am an heiress of a long history polygamist family, it has been 2000 years long to be specific. I am not the person can be so easily freaked out to be so readily miserable by this kind of shitty talks.
----February 18th, 2018
Heard this morning's confusion expressed "Who is going to father your biological child since all those old have already publicly denounced you?"
My response: I can choose the excellent handsome juicy young man from those who expect to share easy luxury life with me happily. I got very handsome blessing from my own birth grandfathers and a fertility-specific blessing from a birth grandmother of mine. I am happy and I don't mind to share a happy luxury life with a great young man even if that means much younger man.
I can totally envision my young and handsome with all our children cheering our securities marching in my own designed uniforms from our private balcony. Well, I do have tons of Imperial titles from my own birth Imperial grandfathers that I inherited together with the financial blessing.
I am a female but I am an heiress of a long history polygamist family, it has been 2000 years long to be specific. I am not the person can be so easily freaked out to be so readily miserable by this kind of shitty talks.
----February 18th, 2018
Heard the reason that my reward from Viagra(Blue) was taken is "Fertility Goddess worship" rumors.
My response: I refuse to let my contribution to Viagra (Blue) to be taken by anyone for any reason.
I heard of this Fertility Goddess rumor today and I have to say I do not know if this is part of so many build-up a case efforts to take my intellectual income because the argument of the true deservedness of taking my share of viagra (blue) invention reward is that it should be deserved by a viagra(blue) beneficiary person who can use viagra to perform sexual intercourse.
I do my clarification here: I contributed to help females' infertile issues with pregnancy-mother is a true statement. It was inspired by my own efforts to help myself to have my own biological children through pregnancy mothers. This inspiration was promoted by so many people who truly wish infertile women can be mothers of their own biological children. And this inspiration was based on already existing matured medical technology of tube baby - IVF(In vitro fertilization).
*I heard oral intake Viagra(Blue) can result having at least several valid sperms in each outburst which can be used to produce healthy children through the same IVF technology. I contributed to Viagra(Blue) is a true statement too.
----February 18th, 2018
听说了今天早上所提到的“你还需要你自己亲生的小孩干嘛？”
我的回应：听说那是我父亲的弟弟妹妹的一个小孩讲的，估计自认是可以够资格凭近亲法律继承的。我已经拒绝让我的财产被按照所谓的近亲法律继承了。
我重复我早上说的，谁愿意这么说，我就愿意对这人那人这么回应：“我可以看着你自己的亲生孩子被火活活烧死，我可以连眼睛都不眨一下。就因为我也已经有了我自己的亲生小孩，就因为我也认为你是不需要有你自己亲生小孩子的。和你也就是彼此彼此啦。”
----2018年2月18日。
听说了今天早上的广播所传达的“那些年纪老了的都已经公开宣布不要你了，你还跟谁生孩子啊？”
我的回应：可选的人多啦。我可以从那些愿意和我共度快乐奢侈人生的年轻英俊又多汁多液的成堆小伙子当中选啊。我可是继承了我爷爷们给我的非常非常丰厚的祝福啊，我还有一个奶奶专门给了我一份多子多福的祝愿。我很快乐而且我也不介意让一个年轻英俊的好小伙和我共度美好快乐的奢侈人生，就算那是一个年轻了一大截的，只要他优秀，我也是不会在意的。
我真是很能想象我的年轻英俊和我们论堆算的孩子们一起，站在我们自家阳台上共同检阅那些穿着我自己所设计的制服一起迈着那整齐的步伐的保安们。我还真是有一堆我那些帝王将相的爷爷们所给的高贵王室帝王头衔，像Ingonyama（狮子王）这种，我继承爷爷奶奶们的祝福就是连信托的财产和这些头衔就一起都继承了。
我是个女孩，但我可是有着2000年历史的一夫多妻家庭的继承人。我可不是那么容易就被这种下三烂的狗屎说法轻易的给吓到从此苟且偷生的。
----2018年2月18日。
听说我从伟哥蓝片拿到的智慧产权奖励被拿走是因为一个"凭什么把我当送子观音"的说法。
我的回应：我拒绝我对伟哥蓝片的贡献被任何人以任何借口而领走。
我是今天才听说送子观音的说法，我还必须得说我不知道这种说法是不是属于那一堆以制造案子来掠夺我的智慧产权收入的违法活动的一部分。听说伟哥蓝片的智慧产权收入中属于我的那一部分奖励被拿走的理由就是这份奖励就是应该属于那些吃了伟哥蓝片可以进行男女性交的受益者。
我做我能做的解释：我对“不孕女性可以通过代理孕母以实现拥有自己·亲生孩子的愿望”有贡献是事实。这份想法是源自我希望我自己可以通过代理孕母有我自己的小孩。这份想法被很多真心希望不孕妇女可以拥有自己亲生骨肉的人士所大力推广，这份想法是基于当时已经存在也已经很成熟的现代医学的试管婴儿技术--人工体外受精胚胎移植受孕技术。
*我听说口服伟哥蓝片可以在每次服用后的射精时产生至少几个有效精子可以用来通过同样的人工体外受精胚胎移植受孕技术以实现不孕男子拥有自己健康亲生小孩的梦想。我对伟哥蓝片有贡献也是真实。
----2018年2月18日。
02-15-2018 Two different Accounts & Who has a personal named capital account everywhere?
02-08-2018 Two different Accounts
My response: I got into the fight with O'Connors about who owns that American Fund. If my providing has not been taken by some O'Connors as rumored, I have no reason to get into this fight. The rumored providing paid for my living cost in 2016 was paid expense from its British parent fund's (owner's) equity account as instructed by its British parent fund. Theirs is from local American Fund's operating expense.
----February 8th, 2018
This American Fund's British Parent Fund is owned by the same French Fund that owns the British East India Company Financier.
----February 11th, 2018
Albert Gore has nothing to do with me for him to say anything on any matter. And I refuse to let Albert Gore have any saying over my any matter. Please contact 911 police if he insists on you to listen to his saying about my matter which certainly would put you into legal troubles, or call his psychiatrist daughter or any psychiatrist about his severe illusion that he can have any saying over my any matter. He is probably having some sever psychiatry medical situation called Delusional disorder if he indeed just won't stop insisting on having saying over not-his-to-say my any matter, please call 911 or the psychiatrist daughter who will certainly help Albert Gore.
----February 1st, 2018
Compare to most of those who insist on having a saying on the radio to shit my name, at least, I have my capital accounts in my trusts that is in this investing chain to claim myself an investor of the radio company.
If my name is not listed as the capital account's name is the reason I have no saying over this radio program producing, so is every one of those almighty prominent persons who insist on to shit me on the radio. This is precisely the reason I sent them to courts, criminal or civil.
The rumored implanting cancer is not concerning since most of the cancers can be treated or even cured completely nowadays. Rumored cancer implanting is a mechanism to simulate cancer's formation from healthy cells which means it is a very early stage in cancer formation that defects healthy cells. It is well-known that modern cancer diagnosis is the mechanism of recognizing those defected cells. The treatment mechanism, I assume, can be simple as remove those defected cells upon its discovery. This treatment mechanism is already available nowadays.
----February 14th, 2018
听说了我不应该被承认是北京奥运会创意的原因是如果当时没有被FBI所录影，也就不会有我这份创意。
我的回应：如果这样也就明确一定会造成北京2008奥运会开闭幕式就永远都不会是2008年北京奥运会所向世界呈现的那份制作。
2008年北京奥运会开闭幕式之所以会被制作成2008年时中国向全世界所呈现的那样，就是因为北京2008年奥运会开闭式是采用了我的创意。我方敏是2008北京奥运会开闭幕式的创意是没有任何一个遵纪守法有良知责任的人所能够抵赖的，更不用说那些号称有才华可以领导一个国家的人。能够领导一个国家可以为人民服务的机会绝不应该意味着可以用政府的权利带头破坏法律掠夺老百姓。我是一个个体，这事是牵涉到我的一个个别案例，如果政府职权就只意味着掠夺百姓的便利权利。我方敏绝不会是人民这个定义中唯一被掠夺的一个老百姓。
-----2018年2月10日。
02-14-2018 This morning's Proud of "Well Deserved Giving-only Promised Share Forever Romance"
Heard this morning's announcement of a Jessica's one female's polygamist family.
My response: The four announced proud sharing males have nothing to do with me is a true statement. Let whoever read this blog to decide if I am writing out of jealous.
I heard this morning's proud announcement of 4 brothers sharing a one-and-only child each from one Jessica. This Jessica, I accused, is the hater you heard on the radio that fully supported by this males group to throw all those shits towards me.
I heard the announced four males are not really brothers but cousins by blood. Their willingness to be a group to center the Jessica to have this polygamist family is indeed very impressive.
Compared to the four prominent named males, this Jessica is in her late forties who has no advantage in age, no advantage in appearance, no advantage in education, talents or achievement, no advantage in family wealth, no advantage in the family name's prominence and resources.
Very impressively is the rumor that romance is promised forever as long as this Jessica is available to anyone of the four's desire.
Very impressively is the enormous supports publicly presented by the families as well as relatives of those males.
Very impressive is the full-heart willingness that proudly emphasized publicly & privately through all these spoil this Jessica rotten expression.
So, I say
It is not some disgustingness because it is obvious that the wealthy family name's proud is that brothers sharing one woman is not out of poverty,
It is not some sacrificing because it is obvious that none of these four prominent males have done this without their own full heart willingness.
It is not some unfitness because it is obvious that there is nothing to match the males with the female Jessica at all when matchmaking concept needed to be mentioned.
Thus, I conclude
It must be the Gift of Deservedness from whatever creature these four males take as their almighty.
It must be the Fair Evaluation of who those males truly are to have this female Jessica to be what they truly deserve.
It must be the Pure Simplicity of what Jessica vs David is in British-American adult slang.
Being the victim of this polygamist family's public expression of negativeness, I confess
I am truly happy I am truly not what they deserved in romance,
I am truly not willing to be a giving-only in my romance,
I truly not deserve to be such a David to have this Jessica-Davids style of fair evaluation.
I can't afford not to mention that none of these Davids, Jessicas or equivalent has a capital account that is big enough to self-claim a significant investor or an investor at all in the radio company or any of R's investment.
Compare to most of them, at least, I have my capital accounts in my trusts that is in this investing chain to claim myself an investor of the radio company.
If my name is not listed as the capital account's name is the reason I have no saying over this radio program producing, so is everyone of those almighty prominent persons who insist on to shit me on the radio. This is precisely the reason I sent them to courts, criminal or civil..
----February 14th, 2018
02-11-2018 Two different Accounts
02-08-2018 Two different Accounts
My response: I got into the fight with O'Connors about who owns that American Fund. If my providing has not been taken by some O'Connors as rumored, I have no reason to get into this fight. The rumored providing paid for my living cost in 2016 was paid expense from its British parent fund's (owner's) equity account as instructed by its British parent fund. Theirs is from local American Fund's operating expense.
----February 8th, 2018
This American Fund's British Parent Fund is owned by the same French Fund that owns the British East India Company Financier.
----February 11th, 2018
Albert Gore has nothing to do with me for him to say anything on any matter. And I refuse to let Albert Gore have any saying over my any matter. Please contact 911 police if he insists on you to listen to his saying about my matter which certainly would put you into legal troubles, or call his psychiatrist daughter or any psychiatrist about his severe illusion that he can have any saying over my any matter. He is probably having some sever psychiatry medical situation called Delusional disorder if he indeed just won't stop insisting on having saying over not-his-to-say my any matter, please call 911 or the psychiatrist daughter who will certainly help Albert Gore.
----February 1st, 2018
听说了我不应该被承认是北京奥运会创意的原因是如果当时没有被FBJI所录影，也就不会有我这份创意。
我的回应：如果这样也就明确一定会造成北京2008奥运会开闭幕式就永远都不会是2008年北京奥运会所向世界呈现的那份制作。
2008年北京奥运会开闭幕式之所以会被制作成2008年时中国向全世界所呈现的那样，就是因为北京2008年奥运会开闭式是采用了我的创意。我方敏是2008北京奥运会开闭幕式的创意是没有任何一个遵纪守法有良知责任的人所能够抵赖的，更不用说那些号称有才华可以领导一个国家的人。能够领导一个国家可以为人民服务的机会绝不应该意味着可以用政府的权利带头破坏法律掠夺老百姓。我是一个个体，这事是牵涉到我的一个个别案例，如果政府职权就只意味着掠夺百姓的便利权利。我方敏绝不会是人民这个定义中唯一被掠夺的一个老百姓。
-----2018年2月10日。
02-10-2018
Heard this morning's mention of two Fang's names health.
My response: In 2004, it was mentioned that my father's siblings and my grandfather's siblings would have local health insurances provided that, as a joke, should be deducted from their own money of ￥500 Million that I was willing to gift later or so. They are my father side's relatives that I heard of or am familiar of.
I would feel bad if there was no such discussion in 2004 when I made the arrangement of my own parents' healthcare. The healthcare I received is the reason I have this confidence about if my parents still alive.
----February 10th, 2018
Heard some confusion of other health care.
My response: My mother's eldest sister, 王博真， who was very nice to me when I was little, had received best available local health care provided for her in her last days. It was from her, when I was 12-14 years old, that she had her own child adopted and I was only her sister's child. I felt comfortable that she had received the health care she needed in her last days, and I am comfortable that I was not the person she needed for accompanying in her last days.
----February 10th, 2018
Rumored the reason I should not be acknowledged as the Creator of Beijing Olympic Opening is that if FBI did not record, then my creative ideas won't be produced.
My response: This is a true statement that obviously and definitely would results in Beijing Olympic Game opening would never be presented as it was.
The 2008 Beijing Olympic Game Open is what it was is because that is produced from my creative ideas. The creator of 2008 Beijing Olympic Opening is Min Fang is a matter of fact that no decent lawful person can deny, not to mention those claimed talented enough to lead a Nation. The opportunity to lead a Nation to serve the people is not the same meaning of being the driving force to violate laws to rob the people. I am an individual and this is my individual case but I won't be the only individual as part of the people's definition that being robbed if government official position means the power to perform the robbery to the people.
-----February 10th, 2018
听说了我不应该被承认是北京奥运会创意的原因是如果当时没有被FBJI所录影，也就不会有我这份创意。
我的回应：如果这样也就明确一定会造成北京2008奥运会开闭幕式就永远都不会是2008年北京奥运会所向世界呈现的那份制作。
2008年北京奥运会开闭幕式之所以会被制作成2008年时中国向全世界所呈现的那样，就是因为北京2008年奥运会开闭式是采用了我的创意。我方敏是2008北京奥运会开闭幕式的创意是没有任何一个遵纪守法有良知责任的人所能够抵赖的，更不用说那些号称有才华可以领导一个国家的人。能够领导一个国家可以为人民服务的机会绝不应该意味着可以用政府的权利带头破坏法律掠夺老百姓。我是一个个体，这事是牵涉到我的一个个别案例，如果政府职权就只意味着掠夺百姓的便利权利。我方敏绝不会是人民这个定义中唯一被掠夺的一个老百姓。
-----2018年2月10日。
02-08-2018 Two different Accounts
Heard this morning's talk about two different accounts.
My response: I got into the fight with O'Connors about who owns that American Fund. If my providing has not been taken by some O'Connors as rumored, I have no reason to get into this fight. The rumored providing paid for my living cost in 2016 was paid expense from its British parent fund's (owner's) equity account as instructed by its British parent fund. Theirs is from local American Fund's operating expense.
----February 8th, 2018
02-06-2018 为什么说我是的钱以及我能做的一些解释。
我的继承是怎么回事：
我继承财产的故事其实很简单，就是因为我是家里2500年来第一个有着和爷爷们一样的家里的继承掌纹胎记的女孩子，我爷爷们用为我设立信托的方式给了我一些礼物以示庆贺总算有了我（女孩）加盟之意。这钱那钱是我的就是因为是由我爷爷们替我设立的信托投资的。
我所继承的信托里就没有方承捷的名字，我和他都还没有生出来啊。我在我爷爷的遗嘱里是个代号“女掌（有掌纹胎记的女儿）”。我能抢他什么钱？
我的祖爷爷（我爷爷A），也就是设立这个信托的那个人在他的信里（遗嘱里）界定了一个由他自己的哪个儿子（我爷爷B）所出的家族继承胎记一支的一个有着家族继承胎记的女儿是这个信托的唯一受益人。遗嘱信中所界定的那个儿子（我爷爷B）是一个有家族继承胎记的儿子。
我爷爷B，也就是我爷爷A在他自己所立遗嘱里所界定的继承人儿子，没有生出一个有继承胎记的女儿而是生了一个有继承胎记的儿子（我爷爷C）。所以，我爷爷B就通知了那些照看着这个信托的人，这个信托的继承胎记女受益人将是由他这个有继承胎记的儿子（我爷爷C）这支所出的。
就这样一代又一代，直到我爷爷方智仁这一代。我的父亲方文海是我爷爷方智仁所出的有继承胎记的儿子。所以我爷爷方智仁就通知了那些照看着这个信托的人，这个信托的继承胎记女受益人将是由他这个有继承胎记的儿子方文海这支所出的。
我是1967年出生，我的家族胎记掌纹和我父亲方文海的胎记掌纹几乎是一摸一样的。
这是为什么我说我是按照我祖爷爷（我爷爷A）的遗嘱继承了我祖爷爷（我爷爷A）所设立的这个信托。那个基金是由我所继承的这个信托所设立的，所以我说那是我的基金。
有关我继承财产的一些矛盾愤怒及我的解释：
"你要是有钱，为什么就不能给他或她一点。”
我回答：我有钱，只因为有个他或她想要也需要，你就替他或她跟我要钱，也就是你在替他或她讨饭就是了，否则谁不需要钱哪。街边上讨饭的哪一个不是因为觉得过路人有钱，而讨饭的确实需要才讨的呀？可你讨得也太狠了点，不是一分两分，是豪宅名车貂皮大衣，还要永远如此。我方敏就是拒绝给钱。
你要真是需要帮助，去慈善机关就得。只要你属于慈善帮助的对象，符合条件，他们会帮助你，不会给你脸色看的。我所继承的财产都有支持慈善。需要说明的是，虽然是我方敏的投资在捐款，但这些钱都是当地人挣得，所以“同样来自中国大陆”不会是优先得到慈善帮助的任何原因。
“你要是继承了财产，为什么就不能对中国做点贡献”
我回答：你指的是对中华人民共和国960万平方公里和十三亿人民做贡献吗？文化上，2008年北京奥运会残奥会开闭幕式；经济上，蔬菜大棚，城市公交地铁，等等，这可都是2004年我继承财产以后对中国的贡献。你想要的究竟是什么具体的贡献？
“你要是有钱，为什么就不能给你弟弟老婆一点钱”。
我回答：我的母亲作为我父亲的老婆被我父亲养着，吃住我父亲的，就是因为她自己没有收入就被我弟弟的老婆找了一堆的朋友来教训教训要我母亲识相点，别忘了她自己就只是个没有收入的人。我作为我母亲的女儿，我就是不乐意给这个所谓弟弟的老婆一分一厘我的钱。我就是不乐意给这个所谓的弟弟的老婆所生的任何杂种非杂种一分一厘我的钱，更不用说大把钱。我方敏就是拒绝给任何钱。
“我就是不明白，那些有钱男人已经是一次次的宣布和你一点关系都没有，你为什么还说你很有钱？”
我回答: 因为我的钱不是那些有钱男人给的，而是我自己亲生的爷爷们给的。我的钱和他们家里财产有一些投资伙伴的关系，就这关系。
他们一次次的宣布和我没关系，有些是出于他们自己的生活状态以及和我的矛盾，有些是不堪被这些来自中国的愤怒言语及被要求协助非法分我所继承的财产所骚扰。
“我就是不明白，为什么你有钱，我怎么没有？”
我回答：你很清楚你和我一点血缘关系都没有，而我的钱是我自己亲生爷爷给我的，你还问为什么你没有？
你是在强调中国是个大妓院,而你是中国大妓院成员之一吗？也就是你虽然和我没有性关系，你也可以凭你的裤裆应该有钱吗？你也是因为弄不清性交，夫妻性关系与父母子女之间因父母性交而产生的血脉传承关系的区别吗？还能有什么原因你就是不明白，我的钱和你一点关系都没有，你还就是必须要让我把话跟你说清楚还必须让你弄明白为止，还特别够资格就是愤怒？
你得先问问谁愿意做你的嫖客再问凭什么。我方敏拒绝做你的嫖客，我方敏拒绝让你幻象你可以凭你的裤裆来要我的钱。
“我就是不明白，你有钱，为什么你的亲戚却是一点都没有？”
我回答：我继承的是信托，是我的爷爷们因为我是个女继承人另外给的。我的亲戚们都已经在他们的父辈去世分家产时拿到了他们自己的那一份，这包括我父亲的兄弟姊妹也都在他们的父亲1965年去世时拿到了他们父亲给的财产。中华人民共和国的信托法和继承法可以帮助你了解很多什么是信托继承或者继承信托。
我的父亲目前是失踪，我到目前为止都没有听说我父亲继承了什么财产，而我父亲的毕生积蓄和唯一的一套房子估计已经被他唯一的儿子（我弟弟）转移到了我弟弟的名下。
我所继承的信托不是我父亲给的，是我的爷爷们，也就是我父亲的父亲及爷爷们给的。
“我就是不明白，你有钱，为什么你要吃救济？”
我回答：我不是在吃救济。因为信托财产之后经常会出现一些这样那样的意外状况，而且因为法律为保障信托人的利益而设置的一系列规范，财产信托后再更改信托财产时所决定的生活供给很难，所以在我2004年继承信托后，因为健康原因又再办理所继承财产的诚信托付时，有人建议我的生活供给通过美国政府的福利系统给付以保障我的生活不至于因为一些意外状况而真的流落街头没饭吃。我现在的生活低水平就是因为一些这样那样的状况，这些状况目前已经在法律处理当中了。
有没有可能有其他方家血脉的钱在我的信托里？
回答：真的没有。目前我在我博客上宣布的已经向我支付健康保健给付的，也就是被闹得很凶的那几个基金，都是已在美国几百年了，也就是几百年以前就已经被信托的钱了。从当年办理信托到现在已经好几百年，也换了很多律师，都没有联络他们就是因为没有他们的钱。。
有人说万一那？
我回答：没有万一。要么就是有钱但不想给才没给，要么就是没有钱。没有任何万一的。一切是按照信托法和继承法所规范的。
我有收到钱就已经说明我的律师是诚信很好的，按我爷爷的托付把钱给我了。这就已经说明我的律师没有他们的钱。
如果有方家亲戚问他们爷爷奶奶的钱在哪里。
我的回应：他们的爷爷奶奶从来就没告诉过我。
解释：我不认识他们的爷爷奶奶，我的爷爷奶奶是在1965年及之前就去世了。我是1967年才出生的，从未见过他们的爷爷奶奶或是我的爷爷奶奶。我父亲是连他自己亲爹的钱藏哪儿了都没有听说过。我哪里会知道他们的爷爷奶奶把钱给藏在哪儿啦?
至于我的信托律师会不会知道他们爷爷奶奶的潜藏在哪儿啦，我得说清楚现在应该所有人都知道我的信托律师诚信很好，要是他们这些律师知道他们爷爷奶奶的藏钱处，那一定是会通知他们继承的。
至于我要是听说什么消息，我可以通知警方，因为“不知道他们人在哪才没给钱”这种情况是不大可能的。在国外，都是受委托律师承担通知受益人继承财产的责任。
为什么说那家基金从来不是欧家的（O'Connor)。
这家美国基金公司从来不是OConnor家的钱。这个美国基金和英国东印度公司投资人基金是由同一个上级的·法国基金公司所投资的。整个英国法国都知道，听说就因为东印度公司的投资人基金（也是这家基金的投资人）是英国王室曾经最想要的基金。但这个基金是有个法国上级公司，虽然法国英国是谁也不怕谁，但这家法国公司还有个斯堪的纳维亚半岛的上级投资公司，所以整个英国和法国都知道这个基金是个亚洲人所设的信托投资的，从来就不是欧家的（从来不是O'Connor家的）。闹了有一两百年，英国王室没弄到手也就算了。现在他们也不要了。都听到英国王室宣布不会和我有任何关系没有任何小孩也不会有任何小孩，就是宣布不会再要这个基金。（基金只有被我所孕育的英国王储所拥有才可以被英国王室合法拥有）。
我是英国东印度公司的投资人就是因为英国的东印度公司是由我的信托投资的。英国东印度公司有很多投资人，这家投资基金时期最早的投资人，也是最有名的。我的主家资本账户是在我所继承的信托里，不在这家英国基金里， 这家企业账本上只有其上级法国基金投资公司作为主家有主家资本账户。况且公司也不见得人人都确定知道我是公司的投资人，所以尽管这家美国企业是我的信托所投资的，一般情况下我也不会直接跑去公司拿钱。
就象有个银行家开了10家饭店，这个银行家要是需要什么东西，最恰当的就是联络和他有直接工作关系的替他照看餐馆的经理，因为那些餐馆员工不见得人人都认识这个银行家。我也是一样。我是在我自己的手机录音机上就可以有效留言给我的信托律师，我父亲应该也可以。但我父亲最好是和我联络以免感觉被忽视了。
我要劝我父亲耐心点，我们的情况已经在好转。众所周知，如果我的情况好，我父亲就不可能是现在这份处境，而我们是现在这份处境，就已经说明我的律师们是很忙很忙了。我知道的是，至少是美国的执法机关在我寻求他们的帮助开始就是忙的不得了。
我是有适当的授权而由这家美国基金支付费用医药及生活，这家美国基金是把这份替我支付的费用从其上级法国基金投资公司的主家资本账户里的应缴盈利部分扣除，而这法国基金投资公司再把这笔钱从其斯堪的纳维亚上级投资公司的主家资本账户里的应缴盈利部分里扣除，持续如此，最终就是由我自己的信托里的我的主家资本账户里的应收账款里扣除。所以，如果这家美国基金在其法国投资公司的授权下，由美国投资基金公司的法国基金主家资本账户里替我支付费用，这份费用付款是合法支付而且只能被我使用，因为这些钱最终是由我替我自己支付的。所有这些费用支付都不应该被误认为是什么捐款。
----2018年2月6日。
02-04-2018 My father still alive but not on public welfare (我父亲还在但不由民政局援助）
Heard my father is alive.
My response: I heard through this morning's messy arguments that my father is alive but he is not his own pension or provided through Chinese government's welfare as I am provided through U.S. government welfare system.
It was decided on July 1st of 2004 that my mother would have some financial help because she lost her pension. I do not remember what is the financial arrangement decided about my father because he should have his pension from Chinese Academy of Science Nanjing Purple Mountain Observatory. It was not about to save some expenses, I knew for certain from my own experience of living in China after 1980 time, they won't have a chance to enjoy what I provided for them without me ensuring that. It did shock me how he could be threatened to "lose" his own pension. He may be on the emergency arrangement of my providing.
A lot of people have puzzled how that rumor could be possible, it is actually the typical 1980 is about. This "how could it possible" is possibly the same reason that my father got up from the ground on his own and left home without taking his Bankcard where his pension should be deposited. He was announced dead after he ousted from his own home this way.
The rumor I heard is he was pushed out of a moving vehicle after he was pretty much dragged in. And when he was threatened that Do not call the police, Do not try to the get pension, and if he dares to demand the pension, he won't have a next meal to eat. By rumor, my father was pushed out by the current Chinese Premier Li, and all these threats were told by a female with the current Chinese Premiere's Li's presence. I heard this rumor can be verified from Satellite records.
The typical 1980 means there was no pre-arrangement to ensure my father could get up from his fall, there was no pre-arrangement to let my father have some food or lodging. And it means that after all these were said, my father has nothing to do with those who pushed him out of the moving vehicle and threatened him unless my father called police or demanding his pension. My father is not the person know this language smartness. He just got up and left home without his pension. When I finally have some cash to call his home phone in January of 2015, I was told my father was announced dead on October 4th, 2013. I survived similar "how could it possible" situation in 2014 and I started to call police ever since I was told I am supposed to live in poverty and die in this apartment I am currently residing.
Another typical 1980 is, for example, if you do not have a bank card or a bank statement, the bank employee who opened your banking account can tell you know nothing about if you have any saving in this bank. If you go to the Clear Channel radio company now, this "no such money in our keeping " may be the standard answer you will hear if you ask where is my major featured person fee. I did not receive a penny and I did not have any reference to say there is such a radio program ever produced by Clear Channel (IHeartRadio), even though it was such a worldwide popular radio program. In 2016 time, I was still on Boston 96.9FM when there was rumored that radio company would pay this $3Billion major featured person fee. And the Jessica group took it with nothing wrong attitude and till today, it is not in my possession. No lawsuit about it because I can't even afford attorney fees. I called police on this as well.
I am searching for my father because I saw his searching me advertising he requested to be posted on August 11 of 2015 on Chinese Consulate website.
（http://newyork.china-consulate.org/chn/fwzc/zxtz/t1070938.htm）
Following was posted by my younger brother, as he told me, on August 29th of 2013. My father's one is August 11th which two weeks before this August 29th which means unlikely an automatic extension.（2013年是我弟弟所登。但这2015年是在到期2个星期之前，不是什么自动延期）。
(http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/ce/cgny/chn/lsyw/lsbh/xqxx1/t1070938.htm)
----February 4th, 2018
听说了我父亲确实还在。
我的回应：听说今天早上的广播是乱七八糟的，不过结论就是我父亲还在，但不是由中国的民政系统提供生活资助。
因为我母亲在80年代时失去了退休金，2004年7月1日我信托财产那天有决定我母亲由我供给生活费用。我不记得我父亲的生活费用是怎么决定的，因为他应该有中科院南京紫金山天文台的退休金。不是我不肯替他付钱，我经历过中国的八十后年代，没有我在旁边盯着，他们根本没有可能用到这笔钱。我父亲居然会被恐吓而“失去”他的退休金，确实是挺吓人的。他有可能有一些紧急援助给付。
很多人都很奇怪，哪有可能会有这种传言, 其实这是典型的1980年代。这一份“哪有可能会就这样啊”可能是我父亲从地上自己爬起来，然后就这么没拿退休金提款卡就离开了家。他被这么赶出门后就被“宣告死亡”了。
我听说的传言是我父亲是被拖进小轿车里在被从启动的车里给推出去的。当时我父亲就被恐吓说不得报警，不得要求去拿退休金否则就没下一口饭吃。根据传言，我父亲是被中国的现任李总理给推出汽车的，又是在现任李总理在场时被恐吓的。我听说这传言是可以被卫星录像所核实的。
1980年“就是这样”的意思就是说没有任何事先的考量以确保我父亲可以从地上能够自己爬起来，没有事先的安排以保障我父亲有饭吃有房子住，而在把我父亲推出车说完这些话之后，我父亲就和他们这一车的人没有任何关系了，除非我父亲敢去报警，或者吵着要退休金。我父亲不是弄的清这种语言机智的人。他就是站起来也没有拿退休金提款卡就离开家了。当我终于有了一点现金打电话回家时，我被告知我父亲是2013年10月4日“去世了”。 我熬过了2014年类似这种“哪有可能”的时期，2014年底我一听到我就是应该生活在贫困里就是应该在我现在这个房子里穷死，我就开始报警了。
1980年代的另一个“就是这样”的例子，就是如果你手上没有一张银行的提款卡，或者银行的月结单，就是那同一个曾经帮你开户的银行职员会告诉你完全不知道你是否有银行户头在他们的银行里。如果你去清晰频道广播公司(IHeartRadio)探寻我的主要人物的那份收入在哪，你会听到标准答案"我们账上没有这笔钱”。我至今没有收到一分一厘，我也没有任何线索可以说请究竟是什么广播剧，尽管那是一个曾经如此全球红火的广播剧。2016年时，我还在波士顿96.9FM上时，从听说广播公司要付这30亿美金主要人物费用了，到广播公司付出后由Jessica那一帮人拿走，就是一副天经地义，到今天，我就没看见这30亿美金。因为我手上没钱所以请不起律师没有办法打官司。我是就此报警了。
我在找我的父亲就是因为我看见2015年8月11日等在外交部网站上的他在找我的广告。
（http://newyork.china-consulate.org/chn/fwzc/zxtz/t1070938.htm）
----2018年2月4日。
（http://newyork.china-consulate.org/chn/fwzc/zxtz/t1070938.htm）
----2018年2月4日。
02-03-2018 Authorized Providing to me from an Investment would be eventually deducted from my owner's account in my trust which should not be mistaken as a donation. (投资企业经授权所支付给我的费用最终是从我所继承的信托里我自己的东家账户中扣除，这些钱从来不是捐款。）
Heard this morning's talk about a Shanghai Investment.
My response: It is my apology to this Shanghai investment if my father just goes demand money without an authorized attorney's letter.
This Shanghai investment is invested by the Fund that causes O'Connors’ confusion. I heard Shanghai investment's management is aware that the American Investor Fund has a British Parent Fund as well as a French grandparent Fund.
I am the British East India Financier because my trust is the Investor of the British East India Financier Fund. The British East India Financier Fund is the investor of this Shanghai investment's American investor which make my trust an investor of this Shanghai investment.
My owner's accounts are all in the trusts that I inherited, not in this Shanghai Investment, this Shanghai Investment only has its American Investor as its Owner in its accounting book. So, even this Shanghai investment is an investment of my trust, it is not appropriate for my father to ask for providing from this Shanghai investment without appropriate authorization.
It is just like a banker who owns 10 restaurants, it is more appropriate for the banker to ask his manager who works with him to look after all these restaurants if he needs anything from these restaurants because not necessary all restaurants' staff know this banker. I am the same. I am privileged to leave an effective message to my digital recorder to my entrusting attorneys, my father should have the same privilege but the best is to contact me to avoid being neglected feeling.
I am asking my father to be patient, we are improving. It is a common sense that my father won't be in his current situation if I have been good, and we are in our current situation already means my attorneys must have been very busy. And I know, at least, the American law enforcement has been very busy ever since I started to call their help.
If my father has appropriate authorization to be provided for by this Shanghai investment, this Shanghai Investment need to book this providing from its American Investor's Owner's Account which means my father's providing would be deducted from the profit that this Shanghai investment owed to its American Investor's, the American Investor would deduct this providing from the British East India Financier Fund, and go on that eventually my father's providing would be deducted from my owner's account's receivable in my trust. So, if this Shanghai Investment is instructed by its American Investor to provide from my father from American Investor's owner's account, the providing is lawfully provided for my father's exclusive usage because it is eventually my providing for my father. None of this authorized providing should be mistaken for some donations.
I heard my father has an attorney's letter but I do not have any such letter myself, so I am asking my attorneys to check out what is the complaint this Shanghai Investment has filed.
----February 3rd, 2018
Heard what happened on the radio program and related is because it is a CIA project.
My response: No such thing. The rumored U.S. Military CIA personnel is a Miss Pejoves whose last name already means she has huge interest conflicts with me. Her involvement in all kinds of radio program related may have sparked such rumors. I heard U.S. Military has no such CIA project targeted me as rumored, it can be verified if what I heard is true.
Another group people that may spark CIA project rumors is the Chinese 1989 Student movement group. That is obviously impossible anything valid.
I heard the American Pejoves Fund I inherited through inheriting my trust is the investor Fund of Ford's Holding. I have nothing to do with Ford name as Ford house announced.
I heard there are tons of business peoples are so annoyed that I announced this American Pejoves Fund, O'Connors' confusion Fund, both French Funds' American Investments and the Portugal fund's American Investment as $200 Billion each incorrectly which is not encouraging, so I change my announcements now that from this day of February 3rd of 2018, all these funds I inherited that I mistakenly announced $200 Billion each are now officially going up to at least $2000Billion each.
----February 3rd, 2018
Heard this morning's crying talk about where's her grandparent's money.
My response: I repeat what I said in the morning that her grandparents never told me.
Explanation: I heard her grandparents（方智强） died in 1961, I know my grandparents died before and in 1965. I was born in 1967, I never met her grandparents or my grandparents. My father never even heard his own father's secret money hidden place. How could I possibly know where her grandparents hid their money?
Regarding if my attorneys have her grandparents money, I say everyone already knows my attorneys are good enough to inform her if they know her grandparents' money hidden place.
And if I hear any rumor about her grandparents' money, I can tip law enforcement since unlikely unaware where she is can be the reason.
----February 3rd, 2018
Heard some confusion why I make such a big fuss about my father.
My response: My father is alive. He was threatened not to call police as well as not to take his pension. My father was told he won't be tolerated to live if he dares to demand his pension. I heard it was recorded by Sattelite image when he was pushed out from the moving vehicle. The female who threatened him is also a granddaughter of Fang, Zhiqiang(方智强). I am not certain if the name is correct by most likely a cousin to my grandfather 方智仁. My father is not the person knows what she said only means by dictionary definition and never imply anything else. My father did not take his bank card with him when he left his own home. He probably thought how could it possibly mean anything malicious just like what I had been through in 2014 time. In 2015 after I became a sworn U.S. citizen, I was yelled at that I should throw out my no longer in use Chinese passport. I did not listen. I have called U.S. law enforcement's help after I heard this rumor.
----February 3rd, 2018
听说了今天早上谈到的一个在上海的投资企业。
我的回应：如果真是我的父亲方文海在没有适当的由授权律师所出具信件的情况下就跑去找他们要钱，我替我父亲方文海向他们道歉。
这家上海企业是有一个美国基金投资的，也就是让两百多个O'Connors为谁才够资格做东家而困扰不已的那家美国基金公司投资的。我听说了这家上海企业很清楚他们的美国基金投资公司是有一家全资的上级英国公司及全资的上上级法国公司的。
我是英国东印度公司的投资人就是因为英国的东印度公司是由我的信托投资的。英国东印度公司的法国投资公司是这家上海企业的上上上级投资公司，所以我也就是这家上海企业的投资人了。
我的主家资本账户是在我所继承的信托里，不在这家上海企业里， 这家企业账本上只有其上级美国基金投资公司作为主家有主家资本账户。所以尽管这家上海企业是我的信托所投资的，尽管方文海是我父亲，他也不可以在没有授权的情况下直接跑去公司拿钱。
就象有个银行家开了10家饭店，这个银行家要是需要什么东西，最恰当的就是联络和他有直接工作关系的替他照看餐馆的经理，因为那些餐馆员工不见得人人都认识这个银行家。我也是一样。我是在我自己的手机录音机上就可以有效留言给我的信托律师，我父亲应该也可以。但我父亲最好是和我联络以免感觉被忽视了。
我要劝我父亲耐心点，我们的情况已经在好转。众所周知，如果我的情况好，我父亲就不可能是现在这份处境，而我们是现在这份处境，就已经说明我的律师们是很忙很忙了。我知道的是，至少是美国的执法机关在我寻求他们的帮助开始就是忙的不得了。
如果我的父亲是有适当的授权而由这家上海企业支付费用，这家上海企业是把这份替我父亲支付的费用从其上级美国基金投资公司的主家资本账户里的应缴盈利部分扣除，而这美国基金投资公司再把这笔钱从其英国上级投资公司的主家资本账户里的应缴盈利部分里扣除，持续如此，最终就是由我自己的信托里的我的主家资本账户里的应收账款里扣除。所以，如果这家上海企业在其美国投资公司的授权下，由其美国投资基金公司的主家资本账户里替我父亲支付费用，这份费用付款是合法支付而且只能被我父亲使用，因为这些钱最终是由我替我父亲支付的。所有这些费用支付都不应该被误认为是什么捐款。
我听说我父亲去要钱是因为他有一封律师信，但我自己没有什么律师信，所以我会让我的律师们问一下上海企业投诉的究竟是什么呀。
----2018年2月3日。
听说了广播剧及其相关的这一片混乱是因为这是美国中央情报局的一个工作项目。
我的回应：没有这回事。传说中的美国军方CIA人员是一个Pejoves小姐，这个娘家姓氏就已经告诉你她和我之间的利益冲突关系了。她的介入参与广播剧及其相关事宜，可能是造成这些传言的原因。我一听说美国军方从未有这么一个针对我方敏的CIA工作项目。至于我听说的是否正确，那是可以核实的。
那一组可能造成所谓CIA工作项目传言的就是89年学运在海外的那批。这个一听就知道不太可能了。
我听说我通过继承我的信托所继承的美国的Pejoves基金公司就是福特控股的投资人基金。就如福特家族所宣布的，我和福特这个名字一点关系都没有。
我听说有一堆的生意人对于我把我所继承的美国Pejoves基金，让O'Connor家困扰不已的那家美国基金，两家法国基金所投资的美国基金，以及葡萄牙基金的美国基金被我大概说成每家$200Billion美金很不爽（都不止这个数，嫌我这么说好像没有祝好运），所以我改改。
我现在郑重声明，所有这些被我宣布我所继承的每家$200Billion的美国基金公司，从2018年2月3日的今天开始全部正式成为至少每家$2000Billion美金的基金公司。
----2018年2月3日。
听说了今天早上的哭诉提到的她爷爷奶奶的钱在哪里。
我的回应：我重复我早上说的,也就是她的爷爷奶奶从来就没告诉过我。
解释：我听说她的爷爷奶奶(方智强夫妻）是在1961年就去世了，我的爷爷奶奶是在1965年及之前就去世了。我是1967年才出生的，从未见过她的爷爷奶奶或是我的爷爷奶奶。我父亲是连他自己亲爹的钱藏哪儿了都没有听说过。我哪里会知道她爷爷奶奶把钱给藏在哪儿啦?
至于我的信托律师会不会知道她爷爷奶奶的潜藏在哪儿啦，我得说清楚现在应该所有人都知道我的信托律师诚信很好，要是他们知道她爷爷奶奶的藏钱处，那一定是会通知她的。
至于我要是听说什么消息，我可以通知警方，不知道他们在哪才没给钱是不大可能的。
----2018年2月3日。
听说了很多人很气愤我为什么那我父亲说事。
我的回应: 我父亲还活着。我父亲是被恐吓不准报警，不准去拿他的退休金。我父亲还被警告说如果我父亲要是敢去闹着要领退休金，他就没有下一口饭吃。我听说这一切都已被卫星图像记录下来了，就是在我父亲被推出已经开动的汽车摔倒在地那天。那个恐吓我父亲的女的是方智强的另一个孙女。我不清楚名字对不对，但估计是我祖父方智仁的智字辈堂兄弟。我父亲不是听得懂这种按字典定义说话没有任何其他意思的语言的人。我父亲离开家时没有带着他的银行卡。估计我父亲是认为一切出于善意，就因为哪有可能会是恶意啊。我2014年时也是如此。2015年我成为美国公民后，我是被吆喝着一定要我扔了留作纪念用的中国护照，我没理。听到这个传言，我是在美国报的警。如果我父亲现在还是中国公民的话，就必须把户口给恢复了，是必须。
如果我说的不对，请纠正，但要是说我敢这么说出来就不配是中华民族的英雄，我说还是让那个方智强的孩子们成为如此捐躯的“中华好儿女”吧。
我听说我父亲去要钱是因为他有一封律师信，但我自己没有什么律师信，所以我会让我的律师们问一下上海企业投诉的究竟是什么呀。
----2018年2月3日。
听说了广播剧及其相关的这一片混乱是因为这是美国中央情报局的一个工作项目。
我的回应：没有这回事。传说中的美国军方CIA人员是一个Pejoves小姐，这个娘家姓氏就已经告诉你她和我之间的利益冲突关系了。她的介入参与广播剧及其相关事宜，可能是造成这些传言的原因。我一听说美国军方从未有这么一个针对我方敏的CIA工作项目。至于我听说的是否正确，那是可以核实的。
那一组可能造成所谓CIA工作项目传言的就是89年学运在海外的那批。这个一听就知道不太可能了。
我听说我通过继承我的信托所继承的美国的Pejoves基金公司就是福特控股的投资人基金。就如福特家族所宣布的，我和福特这个名字一点关系都没有。
我听说有一堆的生意人对于我把我所继承的美国Pejoves基金，让O'Connor家困扰不已的那家美国基金，两家法国基金所投资的美国基金，以及葡萄牙基金的美国基金被我大概说成每家$200Billion美金很不爽（都不止这个数，嫌我这么说好像没有祝好运），所以我改改。
我现在郑重声明，所有这些被我宣布我所继承的每家$200Billion的美国基金公司，从2018年2月3日的今天开始全部正式成为至少每家$2000Billion美金的基金公司。
----2018年2月3日。
听说了今天早上的哭诉提到的她爷爷奶奶的钱在哪里。
我的回应：我重复我早上说的,也就是她的爷爷奶奶从来就没告诉过我。
解释：我听说她的爷爷奶奶(方智强夫妻）是在1961年就去世了，我的爷爷奶奶是在1965年及之前就去世了。我是1967年才出生的，从未见过她的爷爷奶奶或是我的爷爷奶奶。我父亲是连他自己亲爹的钱藏哪儿了都没有听说过。我哪里会知道她爷爷奶奶把钱给藏在哪儿啦?
至于我的信托律师会不会知道她爷爷奶奶的潜藏在哪儿啦，我得说清楚现在应该所有人都知道我的信托律师诚信很好，要是他们知道她爷爷奶奶的藏钱处，那一定是会通知她的。
至于我要是听说什么消息，我可以通知警方，不知道他们在哪才没给钱是不大可能的。
----2018年2月3日。
听说了很多人很气愤我为什么那我父亲说事。
我的回应: 我父亲还活着。我父亲是被恐吓不准报警，不准去拿他的退休金。我父亲还被警告说如果我父亲要是敢去闹着要领退休金，他就没有下一口饭吃。我听说这一切都已被卫星图像记录下来了，就是在我父亲被推出已经开动的汽车摔倒在地那天。那个恐吓我父亲的女的是方智强的另一个孙女。我不清楚名字对不对，但估计是我祖父方智仁的智字辈堂兄弟。我父亲不是听得懂这种按字典定义说话没有任何其他意思的语言的人。我父亲离开家时没有带着他的银行卡。估计我父亲是认为一切出于善意，就因为哪有可能会是恶意啊。我2014年时也是如此。2015年我成为美国公民后，我是被吆喝着一定要我扔了留作纪念用的中国护照，我没理。听到这个传言，我是在美国报的警。如果我父亲现在还是中国公民的话，就必须把户口给恢复了，是必须。
如果我说的不对，请纠正，但要是说我敢这么说出来就不配是中华民族的英雄，我说还是让那个方智强的孩子们成为如此捐躯的“中华好儿女”吧。
----2018年2月3日。
02--02-2018 中国政府2004年参加的是”联合国研讨会（United Nation's Seminar)"
听说了今天早上的用中文表达的疯人狂言“你死，你活，我都要你的钱”。
我的回应：这女的估计是个疯子，可以狂言凭着她那些可能是钻裆夺权的中国贪官污吏孩子爹就可以就是要定了我的钱。就凭她一对老奶子一个干瘪老屁股而我还没那根棍子，她就敢如此狂言，我只能说她是一个疯子。
在我的广播剧不指名就如此宣布，我就是认定是对我进行恐吓威胁。中国政府的现任官员好像已经不再强调为中国人民服务，就只强调自己乐意。中国的老话"当官不为民做主，不如回家种红薯“似乎已经有了新的含义叫做:"当官就是乐意撑腰，揣钱回家才是富豪”。
我是美国公民，我就是不明白中华人民共和国国库的钱怎么都没有啦？中国经济糟糕的什么程度啦，需要中国政府官员为中国人民向世界人民敲诈勒索啊？虽然我继承财产是真，可那些基金的工作人员可都是世界人民呢。
今天早上谈到的“捐款”，谁捐？如果说是因为我对一些美国公司生意的贡献，那也应该是由美国公司付钱可以打入生意成本省税啊，怎么让公司的外国老板自己私人付钱？再说啊，如果是因为我对美国公司生意的贡献，那也是应该“亲兄弟明算账”的方式，哪有随便捐两个子就打发了？美国是有智慧产权法也有劳工法的，我可是一路都在报警一路都在痛骂，没给吓的一声不啃就一副只要他们肯给两个子就行的态度。
就是因为一些人故意把这些由上级公司授权并从上级公司的资本账户支付的合法款项说成是捐款，才造成我现在的经济状态是“没人会相信我是个超级富豪”。听说我父亲经济也是个惨吧吧的。
他们吵的这些“就是配，才是真正够资格的”，强调的就是他们才是够资格使用这些“捐款的”, 而捐款就应该是谁都可以用的，所以不准我用，不准我花，一口一声要杀了我。我是控告他们根本就是谋财害命，因为按照传言，所有一切威胁都不只是说说而已。
我方敏强调，所有这些由美国基金按其上级公司要求从其上级公司的资本账户里合法支付的款项都不是什么捐款，而是我方敏的生活费用。听说今天早上就这一点已经予以强调了。
我非常不理解的就是中国政府的愤怒。我所宣称拥有的美国基金都是已经在美国几百年的基金，就没有任何可能会是从1949年才成立只有68岁的中华人民共和国贪污偷窃所得，中国政府以及中国政府官员在愤怒什么？我在美国生活是个美国公民，我在美国说我拥有这个那个美国基金，关中华人民共和国什么事需要中国政府官员用各种方式表达“你凭什么说你有钱？” 是美国政府的法律官员在说我继承财产是真实，说我拥有这个那个基金是真实，为什么中国政府就是必须说那根本是撒谎？
听说今天早上的严词强列否认并强调从未参与任何2004年和我有关会议的说法，据说是吓坏了一群亲眼在电脑屏幕上看见他们坐在那儿的中外男女。我赶紧解释一下，他们当时是在参加“联合国研讨会(United Nation's seminar)”。他们的气愤就是美国政府弄了一个什么唐太宗李世民的继承人在那吵个没停，我听说最经典的例子就是当时的中国人民银行的周小川行长，他是作为中国政府的代表参加会议，他还没来得及说话，我已经一串一串的英语就说完了。据说是气了十年。（*等我找到我那篇有关那天大概有多少场“研讨会（seminar)”的博文，我会放个连接在这。）
听说今天早上已经说明当时不是由联合国的任何机构或者美国外交部联络中国政府官员参加会议的。我估计是因为当时谈的都是经济发展，可能有中国外交部人员认为会有益于中国，听说当时是有世界各国政府官员在那儿讨论各种经济发展计划。我并不在他们的讨论区里，我只是在我自己的聊天室里回答一些我认为向我提出的问题。我当时没有参加视讯，只是电话参与，所以经常误以为我听到的就是在向我提问。
今天早上说到的一个美国外交部人员所参与协调的是指协调召集我的继承&信托会议的相关参加人员(Inheriting group)，不是之后陆续参加的政府工作人员。
但我还是得说：
我方敏拒绝所有这些由中华人民共和国政府官员所撑腰的要钱要求。
我方敏拒绝所有这些由中华人民共和国政府官员所撑腰的敲诈勒索要求。
我方敏拒绝所有这些由中华人民共和国政府官员所撑腰的恐吓威胁。
----2018年2月2日。
02-01-2018 Happy to be the person that not Stuck-in there
Heard this morning's announcement that I have nothing to do with any Ford.
My response: Glad to hear that. I do feel very comfortable to seek anything that only means law and justice only.
There were six children announced in the British interview last week or so, I heard all from the same birthfather and none carry my blood. Ford name never has anything to do with me is a true statement which only relieved me from possible stuck-in there situation. I go on living my own wealthy life on my own birth grandfathers' blessing without piss-off emotions is a happy thing that I am very willing to do.
Currently, I am still listening to the rumors about that published girl in 2012. I heard she resembles me and my ancient beauty grandmother's painting so much to the degree that rumored it was a fake imitation made from my photos, but she does not resemble my childhood looks. And I also heard that it was not a photo or painting but a videotape. I am not concerned if she is my own child that has been taken good care of or if I can have own children because I do have "entrusted my wishes to have my own children". My entrusted wealth is safe, so as my being respected wishes.
I heard that the introduced one in last week's British interview resembled the girl in another videotape who won't let go her father's hand. This one, in last week's British interview, does not resemble the 2012 girl by rumors.
Regarding this morning's announcement of "shit this name", it may be part of the organized hate crime I did call law enforcement's help about. I do not know if the announcer is the victim or a participant.
----February 1st, 2018
Heard "Next Kin" inheriting law is the reason for current radio program's producing effort.
My response:
I, Min Fang, refuse to let any of my lawful wealth to go to (or owned by) any next kin of mine.
I, Min Fang, refuse to let any of my lawful wealth go to (or owned by) anyone who has publicly and/or privately announced deservedness or intends to announce deservedness publicly and/or privately.
I, Min Fang, refuse to let any of my lawful wealth to go to (or owned by) anyone who has committed/participated or intend to commit/participate murder and/ or hate-crime that intended(intend) to make me a victim of.
I, Min Fang, refuse to let any of my lawful wealth to become No-Owner wealth through intentionally spread hate crime that targets me in order to make my lawful wealth a no-owner wealth.
I, Min Fang, refuse to let any of my lawful wealth to go to any charity without my clear instruction.
I, Min Fang, refuse to let any of my lawful wealth to be owned by any organization or any charity as well as any government.
I, Min Fang, refuse to let any of my privately owned lawful wealth to become any format of public wealth through any criminal effort.
(*The pressure of writing this to save my own life was the reason I started to send letters to FBI in January of 2015).
----February 1st, 2018
A lot of people said my response pissed off so many people which would get myself into a lot of troubles.
My response: I was almost killed in 2014 and I am still having so many troubles before I even know anything to respond at all. I survived 2014 public murder time in Boston without even knowing what's going on. Now, my response from awareness can only help myself better my situation. Only better.
Regarding the wife's announcement this morning about none-of-my-business matters, I have to say that the obvious intention from this morning's broadcasting is to arouse those freaked-out females to seek protection from those who organized this hate crime against me. I can leave message on my own cellphone to my own attorneys to help myself and I have constantly called law enforcement's help, I am the person who has no reason to be afraid of and I am the person who can't afford to be afraid of that but to fight against those who are behind this organized hate crime against me.
----February 1st, 2018
Heard this morning's attorney speaking on my matter bur representing Albert Gore.
My response: Albert Gore has nothing to do with me for him to say anything on any matter. And I refuse to let Albert Gore have any saying over my any matter. Please contact 911 police if he insists on you to listen to his saying about my matter which certainly would put you into legal troubles, or call his psychiatrist daughter or any psychiatrist about his severe illusion that he can have any saying over my any matter. He is probably having some sever psychiatry medical situation called Delusional disorder if he indeed just won't stop insisting on having saying over not-his-to-say my any matter, please call 911 or the psychiatrist daughter who will certainly help Albert Gore.
----February 1st, 2018
01-31-2018 Do I have my own biological children yet?
Heard this morning's broadcasting of who is the richest E. Ford's children's mother.
My response: I heard there was another interview in Britain last week as well, two 7-ish children and the wife's children are only 6 months in age difference.
I heard several strategic reasons for this children creation stories.
1: Most shocking one. It was from President Barack Obama representing his administration made the decision that these children were born to teach me a lesson who the fuck I am.
2: Tina O'Connor intentionally ordered this two children as one pair of the six-pairs just to tell everyone who the fuck I am.
3: The birthfather intentionally did this to be able to abuse these children to tell me who the fuck I am.
4: the wife is the daughter of the East India Company's Financier's CEO.
It is very necessary for the announced birth-father doing the British Interview last week, it is my no-choice situation that I have to make myself clear that I have been protected ever since I was born from the group that my grandfathers had entrusted their blessing to me. My children are not that cheap to be 6 months older than a wife's children from the same birth father.
I am truly disgusted by all these rumors. My opinion, if these children are strategically born instead of the romantic issue, the strategist of this children-birth story, made-up or real, is either a mother-fucker or a whore-born, no a chance to be neither.
I am the British East India Company's Financial for real. The inheritable family wealth of the announced birthfather of the children is less than 1/4 of what I have announced as my inherited on this blog and already started provided for me since 2015 in reality. He is not that expensive to have this opportunity to abuse my children for whatever value he cherishes, but why would a financial industry CEO's daughter who married in 2007 need to compete with a pregnant woman, surrogate or not, about who's child should be his heir? I heard the girl was born in 2010 or 2011.
So, exactly who are my children? I am confused as well.
One, it was acknowledged that the "birth father" tend to provide inaccurate information if in situations in the interview, so, the question is if he provided accurate information when he mentioned that the eldest girl of his six children was published as my daughter in 2012?
I am a scientific engineer who believes in factual evidence. I say to my attorneys that I stop any of my providing to those two children because I doubt if they carry my blood. I refuse to acknowledge any child to be mine without carrying my blood. Whoever is taking care of providing for my children on my behave know for certain that my children are never this cheap,
What if there are really no such my-blood-carriers yet? Will my life get impacted by this morning's clarification? Not a bit. My life won't change a bit because I never live on that e. Ford's any money. I am currently waiting for my own wealth to finish entrusting. After that, I go on to have my children carry my own blood with a man who has the heart to be my loving mate. That is all I need to do. I am lucky enough that I have my grandfathers blessing for pretty much everything and I freed myself since 2004 from the possibility of being forever in-pregnancy, it won't be my misery if I need to start fresh. Who would against a younger smooth love but fight for an old dry with some none-biological-children, even there is only one such child. Why would I?
To me, a $40,000 yearly income great young man is the same as a Billionaire rich man on financial matters because of my own birth grandfathers' handsome blessing. I am not picky at all on a possible mate's financial well-being. I am the person who had worked hard to make my own handsome intellectual income before I inherited my grandfathers' blessing, I value things a lot differently with a lot of females who are born into or marry into financial well-being.
----January 31st, 2018
听说了今天早上所提到的“为什么”。
我的回应：我来汇报一下我都听到了多少个为什么.
"你要是有钱，为什么就不能给他或她一点。”
我回答：我有钱，只因为有个他或她想要也需要，你就替他或她跟我要钱，也就是你在替他或她讨饭就是了，否则谁不需要钱哪。街边上讨饭的哪一个不是因为觉得过路人有钱，而讨饭的确实需要才讨的呀？可你讨得也太狠了点，不是一分两分，是豪宅名车貂皮大衣，还要永远如此。我方敏就是拒绝给钱。
你要真是需要帮助，去慈善机关就得。只要你属于慈善帮助的对象，符合条件，他们会帮助你，不会给你脸色看的。我所继承的财产都有支持慈善。需要说明的是，虽然是我方敏的投资在捐款，但这些钱都是当地人挣得，所以“同样来自中国大陆”不会是优先得到慈善帮助的任何原因。
“你要是继承了财产，为什么就不能对中国做点贡献”
我回答：你指的是对中华人民共和国960万平方公里和十三亿人民做贡献吗？文化上，2008年北京奥运会残奥会开闭幕式；经济上，蔬菜大棚，城市公交地铁，等等，这可都是2004年我继承财产以后对中国的贡献。你想要的究竟是什么具体的贡献？
“你要是有钱，为什么就不能给你弟弟老婆一点钱”。
我回答：我的母亲作为我父亲的老婆被我父亲养着，吃住我父亲的，就是因为她自己没有收入就被我弟弟的老婆找了一堆的朋友来教训教训要我母亲识相点，别忘了她自己就只是个没有收入的人。我作为我母亲的女儿，我就是不乐意给这个所谓弟弟的老婆一分一厘我的钱。我就是不乐意给这个所谓的弟弟的老婆所生的任何杂种非杂种一分一厘我的钱，更不用说大把钱。我方敏就是拒绝给任何钱。
“我就是不明白，那些有钱男人已经是一次次的宣布和你一点关系都没有，你为什么还说你很有钱？”
我回答: 因为我的钱不是那些有钱男人给的，而是我自己亲生的爷爷们给的。我的钱和他们家里财产有一些投资伙伴的关系，就这关系。
他们一次次的宣布和我没关系，有些是出于他们自己的生活状态以及和我的矛盾，有些是不堪被这些来自中国的愤怒言语及被要求协助非法分我所继承的财产所骚扰。
“我就是不明白，为什么你有钱，我怎么没有？”
我回答：你很清楚你和我一点血缘关系都没有，而我的钱是我自己亲生爷爷给我的，你还问为什么你没有？
你是在强调中国是个大妓院,而你是中国大妓院成员之一吗？也就是你虽然和我没有性关系，你也可以凭你的裤裆应该有钱吗？你也是因为弄不清性交，夫妻性关系与父母子女之间因父母性交而产生的血脉传承关系的区别吗？还能有什么原因你就是不明白，我的钱和你一点关系都没有，你还就是必须要让我把话跟你说清楚还必须让你弄明白为止，还特别够资格就是愤怒？
你得先问问谁愿意做你的嫖客再问凭什么。我方敏拒绝做你的嫖客，我方敏拒绝让你幻象你可以凭你的裤裆来要我的钱。
“我就是不明白，你有钱，为什么你的亲戚却是一点都没有？”
我回答：我继承的是信托，是我的爷爷们因为我是个女继承人另外给的。我的亲戚们都已经在他们的父辈去世分家产时拿到了他们自己的那一份，这包括我父亲的兄弟姊妹也都在他们的父亲1965年去世时拿到了他们父亲给的财产。中华人民共和国的信托法和继承法可以帮助你了解很多什么是信托继承或者继承信托。
我的父亲目前是失踪，我到目前为止都没有听说我父亲继承了什么财产，而我父亲的毕生积蓄和唯一的一套房子估计已经被他唯一的儿子（我弟弟）转移到了我弟弟的名下。
我所继承的信托不是我父亲给的，是我的爷爷们，也就是我父亲的父亲及爷爷们给的。
“我就是不明白，你有钱，为什么你要吃救济？”
我的回应：我不是在吃救济。因为信托财产之后经常会出现一些这样那样的意外状况，而且因为法律为保障信托人的利益而设置的一系列规范，财产信托后再更改信托财产时所决定的生活供给很难，所以在我2004年继承信托后，因为健康原因又再办理所继承财产的诚信托付时，有人建议我的生活供给通过美国政府的福利系统给付以保障我的生活不至于因为一些意外状况而真的流落街头没饭吃。我现在的生活低水平就是因为一些这样那样的状况，这些状况目前已经在法律处理当中了。
01-29-2018 为什么说管理是真才实学而不只是机遇而已
听说了今天早上的广播所提到的“方敏和中国没有性关系所以方敏不可能是由中国的大学毕业"。
我的回应：今天早上的这份宣传观点就是中国国内过去几年一直作为中国政府观点立场进行宣传的，稍有不同是的所强调的是方敏和中国国家领导人没有性关系是中华人民共和国不需要方敏的任何“贡献”，也不相信方敏有可能会有任何成就能力可以对中华人民共和国做任何贡献的原因。据说这是由中国国家主席习近平所主导的宣传。
我方敏强调：如果中国国家主席习近平是由于为中国人民做贡献的决心以及为中国人民做贡献的政绩被当选为中华人民共和国的主席的，在2004年会议期间见过方敏本人，又很清楚方敏过去十年独立生活经历的情况下，就没有可能认为方敏是那种靠着脱裤子挣钱挣地位的。没有任何可能。
作为一个非大众妓院国家的领导者，和作为一个非妓院卖淫企业的管理者，所共同的地方就是都是在领导一群穿着裤子凭着裤裆以外的能力为自己挣钱为国家企业做贡献的人们。就没有任何可能会有凭着非裤裆能力得到提拔的又公认有能力的管理者会不清楚如何识别鉴定评估所需要管理人群及其他人群大概的能力及潜质的。
很多人认为中华人民共和国1949年建国初期的很多领导人，特别是中国军队的领导人，很多根本一个大字都不识，他们可以把1950年代的中国给管理的欣欣向荣，管理还有什么难的？
管理从来不是画画圆圈盖盖图章。中国五十年代的领导人都是从中国国内战争的浴火中，带着他们所管理的军人，在真刀实枪生死一瞬间的战场上，他们是靠着一次次可以成功的带着下属打赢战役活着回来被提拔的。任何人都清楚，在面对刺刀子弹的战场上，仅仅有着英俊容颜及浑圆屁股是没有可能生存的，更不用说因此获得提拔，因为提拔他们就意味着让那些被他们所领导的下属牺牲的没有任何价值，并威胁其他协作部队的军人生命，更没有可能赢得一场战役的胜利。当这些1949年部队的领导者率领着他们的部下迈着整齐的胜利步伐开进北京，南京，上海等等，在1921年成立的中国共产党只有仅仅28年成长经历的1949年，就已经夺得中国960万平方公里土地的政府管理权，你说他们根本不懂管理？
共产主义从来不是打家劫舍，天下大同从来不是共产共妻（共产共夫）。最早的中国共产党人都是家境宽裕家庭出生的，有条件接受非常良好文化教育的优秀又有文化人才。他们倡导共产主义，愿意实现天下大同的美好世界可不是因为他们痛恨自己的父母兄姐所以希望劳苦群众在他们自己的率领下，砸了他们自己的家，强奸了他们自己的姐妹妻母，甚至杀了他们自己的父母亲属。从来不是。
中华人民共和国最早的那批共产党领导人是凭着他们的那份坚定执着的信念，凭着他们对美好生活的那份向往，凭着他们能够让劳苦大众了解共同奋斗创造平等富裕生活的那份能力，凭着他们愿意为中国人民做贡献的那份决心，熬过了两万五千里长征雪山草地的艰难困苦，挺过了家人的不解指责。所有这一切，从来都不是为了让他们自己的生活可以荣华富贵美女如云。从来不是。
1949年的中华人民共和国的领导人，不仅个个都是凭着出色管理能力及相互的协作团队精神赢得了960万平方公里的土地上的集体管理权，更是凭着他们那一腔为人民服务让大家过上美好日子的共同决心赢得了中国当时四万万同胞的认可和追随，他们能够把1950年代的中国给管理的欣欣向荣，从来不是件容易也不是什么偶然的事，更不是什么画画圈圈而已。他们那一批是真正有能力有意愿为中国人民奉献的中国人民的管理者。
我相信天下大同的美好，但我不是共产主义者，我认为在目前的物质世界还没有达到实现共产主义所需的极大丰富的前提下，以强调奉现精神而人为强制推行按需所得而非按劳所得是非常不现实的。原因就在于目前的物质世界让人们需要的东西实在太多而供应又实在有限，实在是不够按需分配呢。我赞成聚沙可以成塔，我反对拆塔就只为人人都有一粒沙。
至于这种由同一个女人的两个男人以这个女人嫉妒了为名对我实施的一切是个计谋的说法，也就是一个中国国家总理李克强通过外交部实行在国际上对我方敏的谩骂羞辱，一个是由中国国家主席习近平通过组织中国国内宣传机制对我方敏实施诋毁造谣全面否定，这还是在所有组织者及参与者完全清楚我和中国国家总理李克强就只是在1991年一次饭局和一个电话的过往，和中国国家主席习近平没有任何交往的情况下，，请问是谁需要中国国家主席习近平和中国国家总理李克强共同拥有一个妻子以实现什么样的国家民族及人民的利益？请问由中国国家总理李克强和中国国家主席习近平对我方敏这一番全面否定及谩骂羞辱想要实现的是什么样的共同目标？究竟是什么利益团体的共同目标？这是在宣传强调中华人民共和国的国家领导人在国内共妻已是事实的情况下，就必须由中国政府机构为中华人民共和国的共妻国家领导人推行所谓的国际共同拥有我方敏的财产吗？
我方敏拒绝这届中华人民共和国政府的睾丸讹诈，我方敏拒绝这届中华人民共和国政府的恐吓威胁，我方敏拒绝这届中华人民共和国政府的敲诈勒索。
----2018年1月29日。
01-28-2018 My Grandfather's Romances（我爷爷的浪漫）
Heard this morning's talk about the romance of the most famous Chinese female writers Zhang, Ailing(张爱玲) and Zhang, Lingyu（张玲玉）.
My response: I heard this morning's broadcasting was soundtrack extracted from original videotape recorded in the 1940s.
My grandmother's maid family name is Mao(毛), a junior high graduated.
She was betrothed to my grandfather before they both even born by my great-great-grandfather. She married my grandfather when he was 18 years old in 1930 and my father was born in 1932. My father is my grandfather's birthmark palms heir. My grandparents had shared 4 children together, my father is 10 years older than his brother Xiahai(侠海) who is the youngest child.
My father's elder younger sister resemble my grandmother a lot. My grandmother was not a beauty is a true statement. And she had very rough dark skin and chubby body.
My father's junior younger sister resembles my grandfather. I heard he was about my father's height and Shanghai style of handsome and cute young man.
I heard that my grandfather's younger brother's name is Zhiqing(智清) who married an elementary school graduated.
Both my grandfather and his younger brother were college graduated.
I will correct my own saying of how faithful my grandfather was to my grandmother. My grandmother had been very happy in her marriage. I heard her advise to her elder daughter before her wedding was "a marriage is matched by God".
----January 28th, 2018
听说了今天早上提到了中国最著名的女作家张爱玲和张玲玉。
我的回应：我听说今天早上播出的是当年（40年代）的原版影带的原声音带资料。
我奶奶的娘家姓毛（被误称为芒或茅）, 她是初中毕业的， 不是小学毕业。
我爷爷奶奶是被我曽曾祖父指腹为婚的。我奶奶是在1930年我爷爷18岁的时候嫁给我爷爷的，我父亲是1932年出生,。我父亲是我爷爷的胎记掌纹继承人。我爷爷奶奶共育有两子两女，我父亲和他弟弟侠海相差10岁。侠海是四个孩子中最小的一个。
我父亲的大妹妹文美长的像极了我奶奶。我奶奶长的非常不漂亮这种说法真是一点都不假， 她还很黑很胖皮肤也很粗。
我父亲的小妹妹文玉长得很像我爷爷。我听说我爷爷个子和我父亲一样高，是个英俊儒雅的上海青年。
我听说我爷爷弟弟的名字是智清，他的妻子是小学教育程度。
我爷爷和他弟弟两兄弟都是大学毕业。
我会纠正我自己常说的我爷爷是如何的忠实于我的奶奶这种说法。但我奶奶一直是个很幸福的妻子。我听说我奶奶在我爸爸的大妹妹结婚之前给她的忠告就是：“婚姻是天作之合”。
----2018年1月28日。
01-27--2018 Is there any difference between the Proud of Ignorance and the Proud of Knowledge?（拥有无知的骄傲和拥有知识的骄傲有区别吗？）
Heard this morning's talk about a locked-up who is good at Astrophysics.（中文附后）
My response: Definitely not my father.
Most of the audience who read this blog may still remember that my father is broadcasted a college astrophysics major graduated but absolutely not a good one but a loser only in this Astrophysics profession.
Now, everyone may already have guessed who might be the major producer of this morning's episode. My mother can be so miserable that she became an undocumented resident in 1988 and had to go "dead(missing)" from her husband's life in 2006 won't be an easy situation.
----January 27th, 2018
Heard this strategy to use psycho ex-romance to attack is inspired by a chat in 2004 about how to investigate a possibly "corrupted" Chinese Customs officer who may have a "secret" romance life.
My response: I have heard this kind of smartness since 2014 that I have accused Albert Gore, who announced his proud of doing this by rumor I heard, a Murder Attempted for my money that he has used public channel media as an armed weapon to perform his public robbery of my intellectual income.
It is solely his own ignorance of what means intellectual as well as what knowledge it takes to earn Intellectual Income, and it is solely his own incapability to know what freedom means that made him so angry of who I am that he constantly challenges those who sworn to make this United States a lawful slavery-free one.
Now, I am asking the person who is currently so proud of doing such attacks, what is the objective?
----January 27th, 2018
In China, we have a saying to describe what means Knowledge.
If you have ever seen a sea, you know what means vast and what means tiny;
If you have ever seen the Himalaya, you know what means majestic and what means insignificant ;
If you have ever commute in Shanghai city, you know what means a crowd and what means a single.
Albert Gore is not even from Pharmaceutical or Medical related college education or work experiences, it is only ignorance can make him so proud to announce on a public media that he deserves to assign the rightful owner of some intellectual making that can only be earned and evaluated by possessing pharmaceutical related knowledge. And he did that for pretty much every knowledge he did not possess through his education or his personal work/life experience. And he can do such thing only because he can have access to a public media to loop the reason as he was a Vice President to lead the United States for a reason, and that reason is he was a Vice President to lead the United States for a reason, and that reason is.....
----January 27th, 2018
听说了今天早上的广播提到了一个天体物理专业很强的囚犯。
我的回应：那肯定不是俺爹。
很多听众如果也看过这个博客一定记得，广播剧里播出有关我父亲是天体物理学家身份的“老情人采访篇”，那几个人对我父亲的评价所强调的就是我父亲虽然是个天体物理专业的大学毕业生，但其实就是个一无是处根本没有任何专业成就的完完全全的失败者。(一个是“真正头胎女儿”的妈妈，一个是“真正红颜最爱”，还有一个估计也有故事）
现在，估计每一个人都已经猜到谁是今天早上这集广播剧的制作人了。我母亲会如此悲惨，在1988年就没有了人事档案弄得就跟盲流似的，2006年还必须从自己丈夫的生活里“死亡（失踪）", 事情确实不会那么简单啊。
----2018年1月27日。
听说这找个痴狂老情人来攻击的策略是启发于2004年一段如何侦办中国海关一个可能另有“秘密”婚姻的”贪官”的一段交谈。
我的回应：我从2014年起就听说了这么聪明的讲法。我是一直指责阿尔伯特·高尔，也就是我听说为此特别骄傲的一个，根本是想谋财害命，跟本是在用公共媒体作为武器实施针对我智慧产权的公然武装抢劫。
这完全是有因为阿尔伯特·高尔自己无知才会不明白什么是智慧以及需要多少知识才能挣到知识产权收入，这完全是因为阿尔伯特·高尔自己不懂什么是自由才会让他对我鄙视不屑而不停的挑衅那些誓言让美国是一个没有奴役的法治国家的人们。
现在，我想问问目前还在为这计策而骄傲的那些人，你们想要达到的目的是什么？
----2018年1月27日。
在中国，我们是这么形容什么叫知识的。
你如果见过大海，你就知道什么是浩瀚，什么是渺小；
你如果见过喜马拉雅山，你就知道什么是宏伟，什么是卑微；
你如果在上海坐过通勤地铁，你就知道什么是群雄（争霸）*，什么是独影（自怜）**。
（*是通勤者。**是地铁公司当班雇员。）
阿尔伯特·高尔根本就不是医药相关专业毕业的或者是工作过的，只有无知才会让他在大众媒体上如此骄傲的宣布他就是够资格指定谁才是应该领取只有拥有医药相关知识才有可能挣到或是参与评估的智慧产权收入。他根本就没有相关的专业技能或者工作及人生经历，他还做了一堆这样的宣布。他能这么宣布也就是因为他霸着个公共话筒说着他的循环理由，也就是说他能当美国总统领导美国是有原因的，这原因就是他能当美国总统领导美国是有原因的，这原因就是。。。
---2018年1月27日。
01-26-2018 My Mother may still alive（我母亲应该还活着）
Heard this morning's talk about my mother may still alive（中文附后）.
My response: I am thrilled to hear. I heard there are some curiosities about how my mother has possibly managed in these years if she is still in China. I know there are tons of Chinese citizens move around who call themselves "北漂，南漂“ which means undocumented immigrants who have no local city registry records. And if my mother has been provided for with housing and living expenses, she probably can stay in any big city without a National ID. And my mother has been "missing" since February of 2007 which was before 2012 when this administration of Chinese government's term started. I hope I can hear she is safe soon enough.
I am confident about her health because she has been enjoying the same level of healthcare as I have been enjoying from my inherited wealth that I call my grandfather's blessing. She has been a great daughter-in-law to all my grandfathers. She has already received four of my grandfathers' blessing that I have provided for her, and this providing will be from every one of my grandfathers and my grandmother who has blessed me financially. I am sorry I can't provide her any talents that my grandfathers and my grandmothers have blessed me, but I will provide her my own making from those talents I inherited.
My father is better because he knows my inheriting stories are real. My father had been my mother's provider since 1988 to February of 2007. And I am the provider for both of them since October of 2013. I hope I can get in touch with my father soon enough.
----January 26th, 20
听说今天早上提到了我的母亲可能还活着。
我的回应：我听了真是很感慨。我听说了有很多人质疑我母亲要是活着而且人也还在中国的话，她这些年怎么活下来的？我知道现在中国有很多”北漂南漂族”，也就是美国这边称为“无证件移民”的这种没有当地户籍及身份资料的一群人，我母亲要是有房子及生活费用供给，她甚至可能没有身份证也能活得挺好。而且我母亲是在2007年2月就已经“失踪”了，这是在2012年才组成的这届中国政府执政之前。我希望我可以尽快得知她是否安全的消息。
我对她的身体健康很有信心，我母亲的健康照顾供给和我是同一等级，都是由我所继承的财产也就是“我爷爷们给我的祝福”所提供的。我母亲真是我所有爷爷们的好媳妇。我母亲目前已经收到了由我所提供的我的四个爷爷们的祝福，她今后会收到由我所继承的爷爷奶奶们的信托所提供的我每一个爷爷及一个奶奶的祝福。我很抱歉我不能提供给我的母亲我所继承的爷爷奶奶们的才华， 但我今后可以提供给她我用这些才华自己挣到的钱。
我父亲的情况会好些，我父亲很清楚我继承信托的故事是真实。从1988年到2007年2月，我母亲的生活所需所想的一切都是由我的父亲独自全额承担的。从2013年10月开始，我父母两人的生活是由我承担的。我希望我可以尽快和我的父亲取得联系。
----2018年1月26日。
01-25-2018 Nanjing Institute of Drug Control and 1980 Style Understanding
Heard this morning's mention of "this radio program sucks".
My response: That was from a colleague from Nanjing Institute of Drug Control that I had worked with.
I had been getting along with almost everyone in that Institute other than the Boss, let me point out that I started working there in 1990 before I explain what possibly the issue can be.
Everyone who read this blog may already know what is PRC80 style talk which means "to understand verbal expression word by word according to dictionary definition", and another important part that keeps the conversation a conversation is the same style of response. It is not that I forgot to mention, I did not even know that is how I survived 1990-time China.
Let me give you an illustration.
Someone give me a $500 and said that this is because that person wants everyone to know that person wants nothing to do with another person.
I am the person have no idea of what the story has been or why, I am not in the situation that I would willing to do anything to ensure I can have that $500, and I don't really care if this person has anything to do with the other person or not, so I analyze this giving action as such following logic:
This person is willing to pay me $500 because I am one of the everyone group that needs to hear this person to express himself as "want nothing to do with another person", that seems OK.
So, I am not paid to ask why, and I am not paid to spread the word, and I am not paid to tell the other person, and I am not paid to ensure everyone else know I know this information in anyway and anyhow, and everyone else may also have this opportunity to have this same treatment of $500 as well which seems won't put me into any trouble or obligation to ensure that everyone knows this information, so it should be alright for me to pocket in this $500.
So, I take that $500 and respond to that person with "I hear you". And I finish the conversation completely and walk away with a $500 in a nothing-wrong-with-it tone.
This is possibly the reason I had with the Boss. He had been promoted a Boss in 1980, and his complaints about me have been "I understand everything he said but I don't give a shit about what he meant."
Now here comes this issue, most of the things he said were nothing to do with me things in my understanding. He tended to use examples of how he will do in a lot of situations to inspire me to react appropriately, but everything I heard was he had this or that issue of his own which shouldn't be my business at all. So, after this fully-aware-of-what-he-was-saying conversation, I walked away with my unchanged working style and never mentioned a word to anyone what he had said.
I heard his negative-ness against me was because he heard "I am a fake" from someone associated with that "firstborn" of "ex-girlfriend's child". I dislike his ridiculous negative opinions about me, and Chinese government may take what he did out of that negative-ness as his acts of revenge for 1989. He does have the character that made the other boss of the Institute as you heard on the radio.
I was famous after 1989, and a lot of people said why shouldn't I help with the Boss if he did have some issues in management, that is if I knew some managing.
Let me tell you that when I was an employee of that Institute, that Institute was perfectly human-resource-ly immune from most of the office politics.
I worked for pharmacology department which had three 2-persons each working groups. One group had one person who was very close to the department boss and this was balanced by the other person having the same seniority in the Institute as the department boss. My group was perfectly balanced one person who enjoyed taking the job as research with me disliked it. The third group was similarly balanced. Plus, the department boss had been balancing everyone's workload on a reason of "balancing bonus purpose" with everybody's full understanding. So, it had been noisy in my department but not really having any office politics.
Another department that we call chemistry department, most of its staff were single young girls that only 3 persons need to support a family. No issues at all for them.
The third department we call Chinese medicine department which had 4 peoples then. 2 females and two senior-in-age males. One female was a married sexy pretty and the other was a young cute school girl that both males willing to comprise themselves to make the other both happy. This was the department had no noise at all but harmony.
I guess what the Institute Boss had talked to me about were "frustrations" that may be from the only department that had not so balanced by human resource factor together with some other issues I considered none of my business.
If you still remembered what had broadcasted on the radio in 2007 or so, you probably would agree the broadcasting was reporting the Boss' negative-ness against me, etc.
----January 25th, 2018
01-23-2018 I have eye-witnessed my loving birth mother has been my father's spoiled-rotten lawful wife (我的成长见证了挚爱着我的生母才是我父亲宠坏了的结发妻子）
Heard this morning's talk about my father's "real true love"（中文附后）.
My response: I heard the reason my father went to Beijing in 1965 was to visit a current radio program Chinese team's producer's mother who my father had dated in Chinese Style when he was in Nanjing University between 1954-1957.
This female has been a major producer representing Chinese producing team since June in 2017 or so. She was born in December of 1967 or January of 1968 as the fourth child of her mother.
Her mother's confusion has been since her own graduation in 1959 or so. She was assigned to a Science Academy's Institute in Beijing. In 1965, my father had insisted on to go to Beijing was because she took my mother's wedding gift from my mother's eldest sister. It was an expensive watch that my grandfather's associated had sent. My mother's eldest sister took the rest of what my grandfather's associated had sent. My mother never even heard of this. When I was 3-4 years old already, my mother heard that her wedding gift, a new silk quilt cover, from her sister in Beijing was swapped by her eldest sister with a used one. Now, this.
Why would her mother felt so comfortable to take my mother's wedding gift after her mother already mothers three of her own husband's children? She graduated a year after my father's graduation, her first child with her own husband was born about two years after she left Nanjing. And it had been 7-8 years after she went to Beijing when my parents getting married, why would she feel so comfortable to take my mother's wedding gift after 7-8 years?
Do you remember the "first-born daughter" story? this is possibly the reason that 'first-born daughter's" mother fought that my father should buy her a dress instead of me. Why would they have this illusion that she could be so valuable after she already mothers three of her own husband's children in 1965? That is even if my father had touched her sexually before her marriage. She was the person went on getting married to another man, why she felt as if my father owed her?
I heard the daughter producer's theory is the producer's eldest brother should be understood as my father's real first-born, or the producer would be the heir of my grandfathers if her mother was the one who married my father.
First of all, I heard the producer's eldest brother was conceived after her mother's marriage and my father never touched her mother after her mother decided to marry someone else. I believe this can be verified from the satellite images. My father did not have much chance to visit Beijing in the 1960s. So, most likely, this Chinese female producer's eldest brother is not my father's biologically related.
Second of all, if this Chinese producer's mother did marry to my father, according to the common senses, since her mother's seeder is a different man, nobody would know who the production would be. Talking about fate, her mother is not the person has the fate to mother my grandfathers' heir because she did not recognize my father's value, which is the most important thing to those who love my father dearly. It is purely an illusion to fancy my grandfathers or their-associated would support that Chinese producer's mother because my father had touched her mother sexually, and my grandfathers' associated knew for certain that the Chinese producer's mother is not my father's first woman.
My mother is well-known married to my father into a bachelor's house that full of stacked-up paper boxes only. My mother did not even receive any wedding gift that is new, from her own maiden family or from my grandfathers' associated, which made her known for "not really unwanted". I am the daughter grew up watching my parents getting old, and my complaints about my father has been my father has spoiled my mother too rotten that I frequently need to do "some corrections" on my father's behave to stop my mother's "I want to have this or that" regardless what that may mean to what I want (my father never has his own wants), and my complaints have also been about how my mother needed my help to make the ends meet to cover her over spending of my father's money.
My mother is the person my grandfathers would cherish as a daughter-in-law for her caring to my father and our family, even if that is out of love being doubted. My mother has been the person taking good care of the family ever since the day she got married, my mother has been the person always put my father and me in front of herself. My mother has been a maid alike to my father and me with her full heart willingness and complete ignorance of who we are. If any of my grandfathers is still alive, I am confident my mother is the idealist daughter-in-laws in their wildest dream come true.
I am the heir of my grandfathers, this is no confusion at all to any of my grandfathers’ associated. I am the girl with their full support because who I am to my grandfathers. No one from my grandfathers’ associated would choose that Chinese producer or her mother over me, this is not just the confidence but a true statement in reality. I am birth-mothered and raised by my father's lawful wife and I stand by my loving birth mother always.
Why I need to be like this? If you heard rumors that she might be the reason my mother lost her human resource records(人事处档案) permanently in 1988 that made my mother a miserable undocumented, that she might be the reason made me lost my communist youth party membership record in 1994 or so permanently that cause so much controversy in Nanjing Institute of Drug Control, and that she may have routed out to herself my father's pension from Science Academy Beijing Headquarter since it has been "stopped in Nanjing local institute because of the fake death claim of my father's", after you heard this Chinese producer has been the major force to produce all these Chinese government's announcements through this radio program to denounce who I am including the announcement that I am not even allowed to step on P.R. China's soil, what would you do after you called laws help?
----January 23rd, 2018
听说了今天早上广播提到的谁是我父亲的“挚爱真情”。
我的回应：我听说我父亲1965年一定要去北京出差的原因是要去见现在广播剧中国制作团队的一个女制作人的母亲，我父亲是在1954-1957年在南京大学念书期间和她妈妈谈过中国式恋爱。
听说这个女制作人从2017年6月左右开始就是中国广播剧制作团队的主要成员。她是于1967年底或者1968年年头出生的，是她母亲的第四个孩子。
她母亲的困扰大概从1959年她母亲大学毕业就开始了。她母亲当时是分配到中科院北京的一个研究所。我父亲1965年吵着要去北京是因为她母亲从我母亲的大姐处把我爷爷的朋友送我母亲的结婚礼物给拿走了。那是一个很贵的手表，我母亲的大姐把我爷爷的朋友送的其他的东西全给扣下了。我母亲是听也没听说过这事。在我已经三，四岁的时候，我母亲才听说她北京的姐姐送她的结婚礼物（缎子被面）被她的大姐给调包了，我母亲只收到了了她大姐给的她大姐自己用过的一个被面。现在，又是这么一个新闻。
她母亲怎么会觉着这么自在就可以把我母亲的结婚礼物给领走了？她母亲可是很清楚她当时已经和她自己丈夫有了三个孩子了。她母亲比我父亲晚一年毕业，她母亲的第一个孩子是在她母亲离开南京两年以后才出生的。我父母是在她母亲去了北京七，八年以后才结的婚，她母亲怎么就这么自在可以在已经过了七，八年之后还把我母亲的结婚礼物给拿走了？
你们还记得那个“头胎女儿”的故事吗？这可能就是为什么她的妈妈就是吵着质问我父亲凭什么只给我买裙子而不给“头胎女儿”买裙子的原因吧。 他们怎么就认定了在这个前女友已经是她自己丈夫三个孩子的母亲的情况下还会如此被我父亲珍惜啊？就算我父亲在这个前女友结婚以前碰过她身子，恐怕也不会这么金贵吧。是这个前女友她自己选择和别的男人结婚的，怎么就认定我父亲会觉着欠了她的似的？
我听说这个做女儿的制作人想法是：要吗她的大哥才是我父亲真正的头胎长子，要么就是如果我父亲是和她的母亲结婚的话，她就是我爷爷们的继承人了。
首先，我听说这个女制作人的大哥是在她母亲结婚以后才怀上的，我父亲是在她母亲决定和别人结婚以后就肯定没碰过她身子。我相信这是可以从卫星影像资料里进行核实的。我父亲在1960年代没有那么多到北京出差的机会。所以，这个女制作人的大哥是我父亲极大不可能的血原关系。
其次，如果这个女制作人的母亲是和我父亲结婚的那一个，根据常识，给她母亲下种的人不同了，生下来的就不知道会是谁了。 既不会是我也不会是她兄妹几个。谈到命运，就冲着这个她母亲根本不懂我父亲的价值，她母亲就没有替我爷爷们生得出女继承人的那个命，懂不懂我父亲的价值可是对那些挚爱着我父亲的我爷爷们来说最重要的事了。如果认为就冲我父亲曾经碰过她母亲的身子可能是事实，就认定我爷爷们及我爷爷们的朋友会选择支持这个女制作人及她的母亲的话，那就是在幻想啦，我爷爷们的朋友很清楚这个前女友不是我父亲的第一个女人。
我母亲当年是嫁了一个家里什么都没有就只有一堆纸箱子的单身汉的事是人人都知道的。我母亲结婚的时候，娘家夫家是什么崭新的结婚礼物都没给，弄得我母亲就好像是我父亲“根本不想要就只是个结个婚而已”似的。哎，我这个女儿啊，可是天天亲眼看着我的父母一起慢慢变老慢慢长大得。我从小到大整天抱怨我父亲的就是我父亲实在是把我妈妈给宠的不像个样子，得由我这个作女儿的经常出面替他纠正，否则我母亲就天天往家里扛她想要的东西，我不纠正我想要的那些东西可就没钱买了（我父亲从来就没有他自己想要的东西）。我就一直抱怨我母亲每到月底就得找我帮忙掩盖她乱花钱甚至能我父亲的钱给花个精光的事实。
就算我母亲和我父亲结婚是否出于对我父亲的爱情让人怀疑，我母亲对于我父亲以及我们这个家的付出可是人所共知的，就冲这，就应该可以想象我母亲才是会被我爷爷们珍惜的儿媳妇。从结婚那天起，我母亲就为这个家全身心地付出着，我母亲永远都是把我和我的父亲想要的看得比她自己重要。我的母亲就像是我和我父亲的保姆一样，全身心的付出完全出自她的心甘情愿，她还完全不知道我父亲的家世背景以及我爷爷们给我的巨额财产信托。要是我的爷爷们还在世的话，我很自信我母亲才是我爷爷们修来的福气，我相信我母亲这个媳妇才是会我爷爷们做梦都会笑醒的美梦成真。
对我爷爷们的朋友们来说，我是我爷爷们的继承人是没有任何疑问的。我才是因为我是我爷爷们的继承人而被我爷爷们的朋友们所支持的一个。就我爷爷们的朋友不会选择支持这个女制作人及她的母亲这点，我不只是很自信而且认为这点是事实存在。我是我父亲的结发妻子所生所育，我永远守护挚爱着我的我自己的母亲。
我为什么要把话说成这样啊？你要是听说了这前女友有可能是我母亲的人事档案在1988年前后被扔出去从此没有了而造成了我母亲成了盲流一般没有了人事身份而痛苦不堪的原因，你要是听说了这前女友有可能是1994年前后我的共青团员档案没有了而造成了南京市药检所就我是否伪造自己共青团员身份而流言蜚语的原因，你要是听说了我父亲的退休工资有可能在“南京当地中科院所被通知我父亲已死亡”而停发后其实是在中科院北京总部被转到这前女友的银行账户里，你要是听说了这个前女友的女儿2017年起所参与制作的这个广播剧以中国政府名义所宣布的包括不准我方敏踏上中华人民共和国领土的一堆申明，除了报警之外，你还会做什么？
----2018年1月23日。
01-22-2018 I am not an Actress and My name is Never a Talented Actress
Heard this morning's broadcasting reflected my long-time scream "I am not an actress".
My response: From my own impression about who I am through a lot of featured stories produced by this radio program since 2015, I am the "nothing but a slut only", I am "an actress only who needs to bow to the radio program producers to have food on the table", and what else? The ground of all this is, of course, I am a "fake talent with no inheritance at all". The courage to shit me all over after 10 years' success of the radio program is from that "fact" that it has been well known in entertainment industry, that it was in the meeting in 2004 already, that I was the "never wanted by rich males, the person 'should stay in my own quarters' expressed by Royals, etc."
First of all, the ground that I am a "fake talent" is untrue. I came from a historic family that has been known for talents, and this radio program's featured stories from 2005-2013 have already presented my talents extracted from my real-life security-tape records that have accompanied me through my life with updates recording each every new second of how I live my life each every new day.
Second of all, my inheriting on June 30th of 2004 is true. I am the lawful owner of those funds in the announcement as you heard on the radio this morning.
Third, I already have my name known because of Smartphone invention on June 30th of 2004, the discussion of this radio program was the next day. So, I had earned my name already for my talents in finding a good business, not my romance, when talking about how I got the opportunity to discuss this radio program.
So, why I have been painted as such since 2015?
Everybody already knew, in the meeting on July 1st of 2004, from the "sex tape uploaded online " rumors, that "nothing but a slut only" saying may have been from Albert Gore.
How about this actress only saying?
I was never in the entertainment industry when I was in China, and I haven't participated any radio program's in-studio producing since the day it started. How have I entitled an actress?
Unlikely this could be from the management who I assume a group of business persons when it comes to their profession. Having a reality radio program in their public channel means it is their business to look after producing expenses and possible profiting, not to mention what it means to the brand name, etc. They were at the meeting and knew all the exchanges happened in the meeting, and that must have been the reason that this radio program has not been known for romance & love scenes compilation.
I have the same impression as the general public that actresses or actors often bow to the romance relationship in order to have opportunities to shine their talents. But this understanding won't from the talented management of entertainment industry because private romance with rich investors doesn't produce public favoritism of any art piece to make a profiting business but only private favoritism over a private romantic relationship.
I heard this morning's episode has reflected the frustration that everyone who made names outside entertainment industry a show-biz person only, by this radio program, to have this "sex-function-only value to live or to make a living". I have never been cheap when it comes to my romance life and I am never the person that needs a rich man's romance to be who I am.
----January 22nd, 2018
First of all, the ground that I am a "fake talent" is untrue. I came from a historic family that has been known for talents, and this radio program's featured stories from 2005-2013 have already presented my talents extracted from my real-life security-tape records that have accompanied me through my life with updates recording each every new second of how I live my life each every new day.
Second of all, my inheriting on June 30th of 2004 is true. I am the lawful owner of those funds in the announcement as you heard on the radio this morning.
Third, I already have my name known because of Smartphone invention on June 30th of 2004, the discussion of this radio program was the next day. So, I had earned my name already for my talents in finding a good business, not my romance, when talking about how I got the opportunity to discuss this radio program.
So, why I have been painted as such since 2015?
Everybody already knew, in the meeting on July 1st of 2004, from the "sex tape uploaded online " rumors, that "nothing but a slut only" saying may have been from Albert Gore.
How about this actress only saying?
I was never in the entertainment industry when I was in China, and I haven't participated any radio program's in-studio producing since the day it started. How have I entitled an actress?
Unlikely this could be from the management who I assume a group of business persons when it comes to their profession. Having a reality radio program in their public channel means it is their business to look after producing expenses and possible profiting, not to mention what it means to the brand name, etc. They were at the meeting and knew all the exchanges happened in the meeting, and that must have been the reason that this radio program has not been known for romance & love scenes compilation.
I have the same impression as the general public that actresses or actors often bow to the romance relationship in order to have opportunities to shine their talents. But this understanding won't from the talented management of entertainment industry because private romance with rich investors doesn't produce public favoritism of any art piece to make a profiting business but only private favoritism over a private romantic relationship.
I heard this morning's episode has reflected the frustration that everyone who made names outside entertainment industry a show-biz person only, by this radio program, to have this "sex-function-only value to live or to make a living". I have never been cheap when it comes to my romance life and I am never the person that needs a rich man's romance to be who I am.
----January 22nd, 2018
01-21-2018 My medical expenses and $200 Million
Heard this morning's emotional concern that is related to the $200 million rumors.
My response: He is the person that has done me the favor to ease my concern of being misunderstood of living on another woman's husband (David Petraeus). My medical expenses have not been paid by David Petraeus' family wealth or his relatives' wealth.
He should not be the person concerned about what this favor has impacted on him and he won't. I asked that favor on July 1st of 2004 and all have been recorded. That $200 Million, as part of the $400 Million, which is paid for my exclusive usage to cover medical expenses cannot be abused to address this concern.
If his emotional concern is because of radio program's propaganda that I don't even have my own money, or those rumors circled around that all these paid-in-fulls to cover my medial expenses as well as my daily usages are just donations from too-rich-too-stupids who just want to throw out tons of money to whoever that nobody would even care where those money went, please ask references if I have my own money or if anyone cares about where all these money went from the persons who have signed out my medical expenses for the past 4 years.
----January 21st, 2018
01-20-2018 Denial through Public Media is a Scheme and Swap under a Virtual Umbrella is a Scheme as well
Heard this morning's talk about "you don't have the money" from China.
Heard this morning's emotional concern that is related to the $200 million rumors.
My response: He is the person that has done me the favor to ease my concern of being misunderstood of living on another woman's husband (David Petraeus). My medical expenses have not been paid by David Petraeus' family wealth or his relatives' wealth.
He should not be the person concerned about what this favor has impacted on him and he won't. I asked that favor on July 1st of 2004 and all have been recorded. That $200 Million, as part of the $400 Million, which is paid for my exclusive usage to cover medical expenses cannot be abused to address this concern.
If his emotional concern is because of radio program's propaganda that I don't even have my own money, or those rumors circled around that all these paid-in-fulls to cover my medial expenses as well as my daily usages are just donations from too-rich-too-stupids who just want to throw out tons of money to whoever that nobody would even care where those money went, please ask references if I have my own money or if anyone cares about where all these money went from the persons who have signed out my medical expenses for the past 4 years.
----January 21st, 2018
01-20-2018 Denial through Public Media is a Scheme and Swap under a Virtual Umbrella is a Scheme as well
Heard this morning's talk about "you don't have the money" from China.
My response: I am fed up with these kinds organized harassment through public media.
The real reason is the confidence of through denying my wealth on public media, and with organized relentless private harassments of demanding my money from all fronts, that even if I can’t be manipulated through glasshouse cancer to "willingly" give out every penny of my money, some money can be expected to be routed out to demander "willingly" by those relentless efforts.
I have to say I am healthy enough to refuse to give out a penny of my money to this kind of criminal efforts.
The scheme is through infecting a victim of glasshouse cancer to manipulate the "willingness" to give out victim's own money. I heard if being manipulated through infected glass house cancer, the amount can be every penny of life savings and every penny of income whenever it comes in.
My advice to everyone who might concern what this means to their own finance to call law enforcement's help if you think this already has happened to you.
And try to make some arrangements about your own finance so that even if you are in danger of being exposed to this type of situation, you cannot give out what you are not truly willing.
----January 20th, 2018
.How about the reason why there are some many confusion who father this or that female's child?
My response: It is similar to the above scheme with a plus of a "swap" scheme.
Through denying my existing romance on public media, through confusing information of who is whom, through enhanced emphasis on "possibility of moving on" propaganda, through exaggeration of "health reality", and through bombarding organized decent match-making, through prostituting-ring harassment efforts, through persuasion power, through glass house cancer manipulation power, through abused "government official's power or government officials' power", through abused "hard-earned good reputation power", through swapping the "romance partner" to mix-match a female with a male in a "virtual" romance relationship, to break an existing romance and to achieve a new romance that start off from impossible.
The idea is similar to the swap game that an used-car can swap a $250,000-house, but full of criminal activities in order to create "swap opportunities and willingness to swap or to be swapped".
It is more scary if a "virtual" heir of a rich can be the swap-game to swap a person from this person's own biological family's wealth.
The idea is similar to the swap game that an used-car can swap a $250,000-house, but full of criminal activities in order to create "swap opportunities and willingness to swap or to be swapped".
It is more scary if a "virtual" heir of a rich can be the swap-game to swap a person from this person's own biological family's wealth.
----January 20th, 2018
01-19-2018 About why I am confident my father still alive and why I am hoping my mother still alive (为什么我相信我的父母还活着）
老爸爸，你其实是被我给信托了， 我所信托的财产很安全，你也很安全，请尽快和我联系，或者联系南京紫台，或者和美国上海领事馆联系要求美国公民的紧急联络服务（属美国公民服务），我已经和他们都联系过了，美国上海领事馆也已经打电话和我取得联系，他们有我的有效联系方式。
我的联系方式：Somebodyinma@gmail.com
美国驻上海总领事馆 领区包括：上海、安徽、江苏、浙江。
地址： 上海市南京西路1038号8楼
电话：021-8011-2400 若从美国境内拨打，请拨011-86-21-8011-2400
如此号码出现故障，请拨010-8531 4000。若从美国境内拨打，请拨011-86-10-8531 4000
传真：021-6148-8266
电子邮件：ShanghaiACS@state.gov
网上预约美国公民服务：
https://evisaforms.state.gov/Instructions/ACSSchedulingSystem.asp
以上信息有此网址获得：https://china.usembassy-
Heard this morning's broadcasting about a locked-up who stole a teapot.（中文附后）
My response: This person was arrested on the same day I was told he is safe now.
But I also heard the reason he was arrested when he was cleaning a teapot in his own residence. Some said the teapot was from his own residence, some said was from the neighbor antique store, either case, my father is not the person would clean any teapot, antique or not. He is not the person into antiques or teapot things.
I had asked the United States laws' help about my father's possible missing since I heard the news from Nanjing in 2015. My father was reported "death" by my younger brother since October 4th in 2013, his city registry was deleted and his pension stopped since then. I heard this yesterday after I contacted the place my father retired from. The radio program broadcasted the verified story that my father walked out of the hospital alive was after this day.
I am the British East India Company's Financier lawfully, and I did have made financial providing decision about my parents' health the same as my own on July 1st of 2004. I have received my own health providing since July of 2004 as I decided on my anxiety disorder treatment. If you know somebody in Boston of Massachusetts area, you probably already heard I am very well provided with my health.
I am confident about my father's health, and I hope my mother still alive (I have heard rumors that my mother may still alive from the circumstances of her "death").
I am currently residing in Boston of Massachusetts area on U.S. soil, and I am searching for ways to contact my father, and with laws help, to move him and myself to one of my own properties. I heard this morning's broadcasting expressed this searching effort with no concern for my father's health.
----January 19th, 2018
Heard this morning's broadcasting efforts of warning my father don't ever contact U.S Consulate in Shanghai, Beijing or Guangzhou area.
My response: That is intended to be a joke. I used O's confusion to describe my problem with Tina O'Connor and some of her O'Connor cousins in New York City area, the "cousins" in this morning's broadcasting may last named O'F, O'N, OZ, etc. who are not even biologically associated with any O'Connor. Plus only O'Connors from the first Senator's line, in 6th or 7th cousin with Tina O'Connor, about 150 households totaled 200 any O'Connor, that have been on the list of agreed-upon providing may have shared and still sharing Tina O'Connor's confusion about "the deserved ownership" of the fund which is the American child Fund of the British East India Financer Fund that I lawfully own.
----January 19th, 2018
Heard this morning's broadcasting of my younger brother's wife's child.
My response: I heard this morning's broadcasting is about a boy, my younger brother told me his registered wife mother a girl.
I heard that boy is fathered by a relative of Fang, Zhiqiang(方志强) who was once featured on the radio program as unlikely a possible heir from Zu's family.
Fang, Zhiqiang(方志强) has no blood association with my father at all. I heard rumors that the DNA test result is about 70% which means unlikely that boy is my brother's or any of my father's cousin's child.
----January 19th, 2018
听说了今天早上的播出提到一个因偷茶壶而被抓的人。
我的回应：听说那人是在我听说我父亲已经安全的同一天被抓的。
但我也听说了他被抓时是在他自己的住处清理一个茶壶。有人说那茶壶是他自己房子里的的，有人说是他从隔壁的古董店里偷得，哪种情况都不大可能是我的父亲，古董也好，不是古董也好，我父亲就不是一个会花心思清理茶壶的人。他对茶壶古董之类的从来没什么兴趣。
我是在2015年听说我父亲在中国被报告已”死亡“后就已经立即在美国报警并提供给了警方我有巨额财产继承的线索。我昨天联系了我父亲退休前工作的单位，是我弟弟告知他们我父亲于2013年10月4日“死亡”。我父亲的退休金和城市户籍登记都在那一天算作“死亡”。广播剧所报道的已证实我父亲是活着走出医院的报道讲的就是在这一天（2013年10月4日）之后的事情。
我是英国东印度公司投资基金的合法主人，我在2004年7月1日就我父母健康照顾的决定是他们和我自己是同一个规格。我自己是从2004年7月就已经收到我自己的健康照顾供给所提供的恐慌症治疗的远程心理健康治疗。如果你有朋友在美国麻州的波士顿地区，你可能已经听说了我的健康供给好得很。
我很自信我父亲有和我以同样方式收到他的健康照顾供给，我也很希望我母亲还活着（我是听说了一些我母亲去世前后的情形可能表明我母亲还活着）。
我目前生活在美国领土上的麻州波士顿地区，我是在寻找和我父亲取得联系的方式，在法律的协助下，希望让我父亲和我可以搬进我自己拥有的房产里。我听说了今天早上的广播表达了这份对我父亲健康一点都没担心只是在帮助我和我父亲取得联络方式的努力。
----2018年1月19日。
听说了今天早上的广播那份“警告”我父亲永远别联系美国驻华的上海，北京及广州领事馆的努力。
我的回应：那是想作为一个笑话的播出的。我在我的博客上用了"O的困扰"来形容我和一个Tina O'Connor的矛盾以及我和她的一些在纽约的娘家亲戚的矛盾，今天早上播出的“亲戚”其实就是一些姓氏是以O起头的，像O'N, O'F, OZ 等等，但其实他们和O'Connor家族并没有什么血原关系。再加上姓O'Connor的，也就只有第一代参议员的后裔，也就是在那些在同意供给名单上，也就是和Tina O‘Connor是七等亲或八等亲以内的，（一共是150多户，200个姓O'Connor的) 是和Tina O'Connor有着同样的“谁才够资格拥有"我所合法拥有的英国东印度公司投资基金公司的一个美国子基金公司。
----2018年1月19日。
听说了今天早上提到的我弟弟妻子的小孩。
我的回应：我听我弟弟说他的婚姻注册登记妻子生的是个女儿，而今天早上讲的是个男孩。
我听说那个男孩是方志强的一个亲戚的，方志强就是广播剧之前有播出过的那个不太可能是明朝朱家继承人的那个。
方志强和我父亲一点亲戚血原关系都没有，我听说那个男孩的DNA鉴定结果是70%左右，也就是说不太可能是我弟弟的小孩，也不太可能是我父亲的什么亲戚的小孩。
----2018年1月19日。
08-18-2018
Heard this morning's talk about some Fund.
My response: I heard it is broadcasted that ownership by Laws.
----January 18th, 2018
Heard this morning's broadcasting mentioned the radio program is like a crazy bus freaking out everybody.
My response: Ya, I have been the one "on the bus" who just can't stop screaming.
----January 18th, 2018
Heard this morning's broadcasting of frustrated expression,
My response: I agree it is a real frustration. I agree it is not ridiculous at all to have this frustration. It would be hard for me to say anything if the frustration is to better by a specific request or requests, I think as long as seeking is a wide spectrum range of opportunities and it is a fair equal employment opportunity, I think it is an appropriate expression from the person who expressed this frustration.
I was asked if this would be my tone to everyone who came from China, I say Nope. It is not my obligation or responsibility to offer any employment opportunity just because I came from China as well. As far as I know, this is the same understanding in any investment inside China and/or abroad that is owned by anyone who is also from China. In the United States, same equal employment opportunity is by Laws.
----January 18th, 2018
P/S A very good news: Critical treatment is averaged 1 hour or so now. Same rate and same deposit.
01-17-2018 What is he doing? and I am good
Heard this morning's broadcasting of announcements from the heir of Zu's Family.
My response: I heard he works for Chinese Justice Department that is equivalent to FBI. Why would he make such announcement to make Zu's family similar to public impressions about Italian Don's family in movies （电影里的意大利黑手党)?
Plus, he needs to apply for a passport from the People's Republic of China if he travels abroad, why would he make such announcement to impressively to promote himself as if above?
He is a couple of years younger than me. I am rolling my eyes.
----January 17th, 2018
Heard this morning's broadcasting of remote surgical infertile technology.
My response: As everybody reading this blog would already know that I will be fine. Has anyone ever wondered what this means? Let me explain a bit.
1: I am well protected.
Reason: The United States has the technology to protect. As far as I know, this technology has the auto-response mechanism and has the capacity to handle a good-sized population on the U.S. soil.
2: I am financial very well to afford it.
Reason: I do have my own money.
3: How expensive for the public to afford it?
Answer: Since it is an existing technology that is automatic with good sized capacity, so it is imaginable won't be very expensive. Exactly how affordable, or who should be covered by this technology's protection, I have no idea.
Of course, there are the human head, the human heart, human..., and human reproduction organs, etc. to make us human alive, which organ is less important? But no panic, full body protection technology already exists.
----January 17th, 2018
01-16-2018 Sexually supported by the Chinese Government made the Voice Loud and What is the family wealth referred to at this morning?（中文附后）
Heard this morning's talk about my uncle's "death penalty equivalent" privilege（中文附后）.
My response: I only need to express my true reaction "unlikely that is to remove any barriers to pave the way for me."
The rumor is when my younger brother was enjoying his "radio marriage" sexually, his legally registered wife has the support from the Chinese government offered in sexual relationship format by Chinese Premier Li at her maiden hometown area. The rumored sexual relationship was open-door, curtain-down experience. This is the style fits rumors of how the Taiwanese Miss Li got conceived to mother Chinese Premier Li's sons in front of his secret service agents'(警卫员) widely opened eyes.
What I heard the reason for this style is that this is the only way to be convincing that he mated the female sexually. She has eyewitnesses offered by the Chinese Premier Li and her own recorded tapes. I heard the Taiwanese do have very hard time to convince the People's Republic of China's government that she is the birth mother of the Chinese Premier Li's birth sons. Heard there are still some arguments how could possibly she mothers his children.
You did hear my younger brother's wife is the voice that is supported by the People's Republic of China's government on my father's welfare on the other day's radio broadcasting.
It is rumored that the other female who participated "radio marriage" has the same support from the Chinese government offered by the same person in same having eye-witnesses way. And you did hear her voice loud and loud on the radio earlier, right? But, but there are also rumors she father the same person's office staff's some relative's child is the reason.
I say to my uncle, I know you only have one child(a son) and if you are willing to let you daughter-in-laws to be supported, unlikely you can keep your own house you bought by your own savings. I am still searching for your elder brother. Now, he got "death penalty equivalent" privileged because of against, do you say which one he should choose, support to be kicked out from his own home, or this?
I am a female, but I already have everything and supported by Laws and those who are my grandfathers' entrusting groups, as well as my own entrusting groups. And I refuse to have any Chinese government's support offered in such disgusting way.
I do believe that "radio marriage" is Chinese Government to pay for allowing this to happen on the People's Republic of China's soil. How actresses need to have sexes with my younger brother and mother another married person's child, if all those rumors are true, can be categorized into practicing performing arts? I refuse to pay their compensation or their practicing performing arts fees.
----January 16th, 2018
Heard this morning's argument of splitting my family's wealth has to be fair equally.
My response: My father went missing currently, and my father is well-known has not inherited anything. All my father has are his apartment he was kicked out from together with his life savings robbed. My father has been lived on his monthly-paid pension ever since the day he was kicked out from his own home.
My grandfather, who father my father, died in 1965, splitting of my grandfather's wealth happened in 1965 by my own grandfather's arrangements.
My great-grandfather, who fathered my grandfather, died in 1930, the splitting of my great-grandfather's wealth happened in 1930 by my great-grandfather's own arrangements. My great-grandfather died of over-night sudden death and all his children were birth-mothered by my great-grandmother.
.............
Exact, which family wealth that is referred to as my family wealth in this morning's broadcasting that needs to be split fair equally?
What I received is what my grandfathers specially allocated for me being an heir girl, what I received is my wealth, my wealth got nothing to do with any of my grandfathers' any other children including their heir sons that includes my father Fang, Wenhai.
I refuse any request to split my any marriage partner's family any wealth as well as my own wealth.
----January 16th, 2018
听说了今天早上的广播提到了我叔叔“就是死刑犯的同等待遇“。
我的回应：我只需要表达我听说时的真实反应就可以：“应该不会是在替我扫清障碍。”
海外传言是： 当我弟弟在享受“广播剧婚姻”的性爱关系时，我弟弟的婚姻注册妻子也在享受着由中国总理李克强以性交媾所表达的中国政府所提供的支持，据说性交媾是拉上窗帘但房门打开方式，就在女方的娘家居住地附近。这倒是很符合前几年海外所传台湾李姓小姐就是这样在中国总理李克强的两个警卫员的圆睁大眼的密切紧盯之下被李克强总理公开下种而孕育了李克强总理的两个亲生小孩。
我听说这种性交方式是唯一可以向别人证实他确实有和女方发生性交关系的方式。那台湾女人是有由男方提供的警卫员做为人证及她自己录制的性交影带做为物证。就这样，我是有听说那台湾女人可是花了好大的力气向中国政府证明她自己确实是中国总理李克强亲生孩子的亲生母亲， 听说就她是否是男方亲生孩子的亲生母亲，现在还是备受争议。
在前几天的广播剧上，听众应该听得很清楚，是我弟弟婚姻注册的妻子在就我父亲的福祉问题上，是由中国政府的强力支持着，才有那一股就是她才够资格，就是她说了就算的气势。
我就想对我叔叔说，我很清楚你就只有一个小孩, 是个儿子，你要是愿意让你的儿媳妇也被中国政府用同样方式支持支持，你自己积蓄买下的房子恐怕就很难保住咯。我现在可是还在四处找你的大哥呢。瞧瞧，中国政府要么支持就是支持他被赶出自己的家门，要吗反对就成了让他有“死刑犯同等待遇”。你说我叔叔他应该是选择被中国政府的支持还是被中国政府反对啊？
我自己倒是一个女性，但我已经有了一切，我也有法律的支持及受我爷爷们诚信托付的那些人的支持，以及受我自己诚信托付财产的那些人的支持。我拒绝被中国政府用这么一种恶心的方式提供支持。
我相信中国政府才是应该是赔偿因”广播剧婚姻”而提出的所有赔偿要求的一方，原因就是中国政府居然让这种事情在中国的领土上发生。如果海外传言是真，哪有可能一个演员就只是演戏而已就和我弟弟发生真实性交配，然后再和另一个已婚男人真实生个小孩出来？我拒绝支付所有的赔偿要求及所有所谓参与演出的费用。
----2018年1月16日。
听说了今天早上的广播所表达的应该公平平等的分我家财产。
我的回应：我父亲现在是失踪，而且我父亲是人所共知的没有发生任何财产继承的一个。我父亲所有的全部就是他自己买的那一套房子以及他被从那房子里赶出去时没能带出来的全部积蓄。我父亲从被从自己家里赶出来的那一天起，就是靠他那每个月发放的退休金生活着。
我的祖父，也就是我父亲的父亲，是于1965年去世的，我爷爷家分家产是在1965年由我爷爷自己处理的。
我的曾祖父，就是我爷爷的父亲，是于1930年去世的，我曾祖父家分家产是在1930年由我曾祖父自己处理的。我曾祖父是在得暴疾的第二天才去世的，我曾祖父所有的孩子也都是我曾祖母亲生的。
。。。。。
请问一下，究竟今天早上提到的这公平平等的分我家的家产，是想分我的什么家的家产？
我收到的都是我爷爷们因为我是一个女继承人而另外给我的，我收到的是我的财产，我的财产和我爷爷们的其他孩子们一点关系都没有，也和我爷爷们的继承人儿子们（包括我父亲方文海）一点关系都没有。
我拒绝任何想要分我的任何一个婚姻伴侣家产的任何企图及要求，我也拒绝想要分我自己财产的任何企图及要求。
----2018年1月16日。
01-15-2018 Should A Public Media's big Investor "Pay to be shited even name harm is the only intention?" 这届中国政府根本就是篡党夺权的政府
Should A Public Media's big Investor "Pay to be shited even name harm is the only intention?". (中文附后）
My response: I refuse to pay to let this “cousin” tell everyone she is the person actually "having attorneys" and capable of "resolving issues".
I did hear this “pay to be shited" was organized by Albert Gore. And I refuse to pay to be shited from those who shit out of hatred.
I never hired no-attorney-licensed Albert Gore to represent my any lawful interest or any lawful rights. I refuse Albert Gore's public robbery attempted that aimed at my own financial power over my own money.
It was well-known I publicly rejected Albert Gore to be supported by my financial power over my own inheritances on July 1st of 2004, I have called Law enforcement's help on the money including my handsome intellectual making that he has stolen from me as well as this organized public robbery of my own power over my own finance.
I am constantly threatened that if I refuse to pay to be shited like you have heard on the radio, then I should not be allowed to be a big investor to own a public media, so what is the difference between "abusively use public media to commit a crime of public name harm" and public media's fair reporting or probing into issues related to public interests that maybe not correct?
----January 15th, 2018
Heard this morning's broadcasting of Chinese government's announcement of the investigation.
My response: I was like "how? They are the beneficiary group of all these announcements to promote activities, what needs to be investigated when it comes to the rumors that they are not promoted by former Chinese administration, but promoted by a female they have shared sexual relationship with since youth time, and by that female's publicly announced their "deserved fast promotion" on the radio program with her another sexual partner's (Albert Gore) support, and promoted her announcement without former Chinese administration's authorization?"
How could I possibly expect the National Leader who committed a crime according to Chinese Criminal Laws by pushing my father out of a moving car and drove off while my father still on the ground could possibly organize any lawful investigation?
How could I possibly believe this National Leader, that obviously well-supported by current administration of the People's Republic of China's government, can do a fair investigation, when what I heard is he invited my father to push my father out of a moving car in order to support my younger brother's wife to kick out my father from his own home that he bought by his own saving and his long years' employment he had worked for the Chinese Purple Mountain Observatory he bought this apartment from? I heard it was the same day (or the third day) that my father got up from the ground, he was ousted from his own home.
My father was a Chinese citizen, at least at the moment he was pushed out of a moving car. How could possibly that can be a lawfully elected Chinese national leader that dare to publicly commit such a Chinese Criminal Laws' defined crime？
I believe all these because of my own experiences living in the United States. I only met this Chinese Premiere Li once in 1991 and moved to the United States in 1996. Entire Chinese government administration, former and current, are all aware I never contacted him other than a faxed letter in January of 2015, addressed to Chinese Consulate New York because of the radio program's featured stories of his romances ,that informed him I was looking for information of my inherited wealth which did not even include a single tiny request that implied the intention of asking his help.
He broadcasted his "romance stories" on the radio after he fathers a Taiwanese woman's children, and he insisted on change my wealth ownership to his lawfully registered wife. By intentionally using the confusion of who is his wife and who mothers his child(children), he insisted on to own my wealth and insisted on to abusing my hard earned fame as if I want to stuck-on him, and actually his desire of own my wealth is the real reason of all his "practicing of this kind performing arts".。
I think it is possible that Chinese Premier Li, Keqiang(Kejiang， 李克强) and his partner Chinese Chairman Xi, Jinping(习近平）and this administration of People's Republic of China's government is illegally formed because they completely ignore the fact that the people's Republic of China is not privately owned by their beloved shared female but by all People's Republic of China's citizens.
I think it is possible that Chinese Premier Li, Keqiang(Kejiang， 李克强) and his partner Chinese Chairman Xi, Jinping(习近平）and this administration of People's Republic of China's government is illegally formed because they are possibly not promoted by the former administration of the People's Republic of China's government who is a group of people believes in China is a Lawful Country and Chinese People are industrious and brave( 勤劳勇敢).
I think it is possible that Chinese Premier Li, Keqiang(Kejiang， 李克强) and his partner Chinese Chairman Xi, Jinping(习近平）and this administration of People's Republic of China's government is illegally formed because no lawfully formed government would violate own laws to create any situation for personal gains in finance or in power. Not to mention live on other people's money and demand to be provided for without money owner's willingness by abusively using a Nation's government's powers and human & capital resources.
----January 15th, 2018
Heard some concern what will happen to my father after I publicly speak up?
My response: It can only be better. China that I came from is the People's Republic of China, not a privately owned whorehouse China substitution.
Everyone who ever heard me talking knows I never criticize Chinese government's any internal or foreign policy before Dec. of 2014, and violent swore about the notorious Chinese Premier L, Keqiang(Kejiang，中国国家总理李克强）and his romantic relationship.
My silence about I only met this Chinese Premiere Li, Keqiang did not help ease the situation that my inherited wealth kept being demanded by his lawfully registered wife but severed it because the reason to own my wealth is"That is his wife's inherited money and/or lawfully earned money and I am his lawfully registered wife Chenghong(程虹), why can't I use that money".
And my swearing about this Chinese Premiere Li, Keqiang（Kejiang，中国国家总理李克强） did help to clarification who his wife is worldwide, but severe the demanding to own my wealth by Chinese government official participation of this public rob my money through radio program's "announce intended ownership on the radio program without any lawful authorization and insist on changing the ownership according to the radio announcements to to really own what announced in reality by promoting the radio program as practicing some performing arts" scheme in 2015.
This substituting scheme that through practicing performing arts to change "owns the money by Laws" to "owns the money by owns a money-irrelevant male's sex" is the reason I say the organizer of this practicing this kind of performing arts is the "usurp party and state power group (篡党夺权团伙)"
My personal eperiences how I need to regain my own financial power over my own money including how I need to regain my lawful power to spend my own money as I wish, and my personal experiences that part of my fights to regain my own financial power over my own money have been against this administration of the People's Reublic of China's government that led by the Chinese Premiere Li, Keqiang （Kejiang， 中国国家总理李克强）and Chinese Chairman Xi, Jinping(中国国家主席习近平） is the reason I would think this administration of the People's Repubic of China's government must be a "usurp party and state power group (篡党夺权团伙)". The difference is just it is a different kind of powers, and that is all.
----January 15th, 2018
一个公共媒体的大投资人就是”就算破坏名誉是唯一目的，也应该付钱被别人骂吗？”
我的回应：我拒绝付钱让这个“亲戚”公告天下说她自己才是“请的起律师的”，才是有能力“处理问题的”一个。
我是有听说这种“付钱被人骂”是阿尔伯特·高尔组织的。我拒绝让任何人出于仇恨对我谩骂，更不用说付钱让他们这么做。
我从未雇佣现在已没有律师执照的阿尔伯特·高尔来代表我的任何法律权利和利益。我拒绝阿尔伯特·高尔企图公然篡夺我对自己私人合法财产的合法支配权的任何努力。
我经常被人威胁说要是我不肯花钱被人骂，也就是花钱被骂到惨不忍睹的就像你们在广播剧里听到的一样，我就不可能做一个公共媒体的大股东，那我想问的就是：媒体就某一事件的报道或对影响公众利益事件原因的探寻，因为对事件理解有误所造成的报道偏差和公然破坏名誉为唯一目的所进行的造谣诽谤公然羞辱之间的的区别是什么？
----2018年1月15日。
听说了今天早上的广播提到了中国政府要进行调查的宣布。
我的回应：我的反应就是“他们查？怎么查法啊？他们自己可能就是因为整个事件而获得利益的团体。 按照海外传言，他们自己就不是由中国的前一届政府推荐选拔提升的，而是由和他们自己都有两性关系的同一个女人，及通过这同一个女人的有两性关系的外国人（阿尔伯特·高尔）通过广播剧在全世界公开宣布他们就是应该被快速提拔的人才，再通过有组织的推广这个广播剧的宣布就是有效宣布等等一系列的活动，在未经前一届中国政府的授权下就通过广播剧在现实生活里在事实上被提拔了。碰到这种传言，他们自己再在同一个广播剧上宣布由他们自己查？怎么查啊？
我怎么会认为一个拖着我的父亲上了他的小轿车，再把我父亲从已启动的车里给推出去，看我父亲摔倒在地, 没等我父亲能够站起来，就轻轻松松扬长而去的这么一个人，一个明显已经违反了中华人民共和国刑事法法律的犯罪分子，却还继续可以当中华人民共和国的国家领导人的这么一个人，会有可能组织一个符合中华人民共和国法律的事件真相调查？
我那有可能会相信这样一个国家领导人，一个还明显被这一届中国政府鼎力支持的这么一个人，做所有这一切就是为了协助我弟弟的妻子把我父亲给赶出我父亲自己出钱买的天文台的职工宿舍的家门的这么一个人，会有可能做任何公平的调查啊？我听说的是：我父亲就是在南京的北京东路上，就是在大白天，就是在天文台宿舍大院的前面被公然推出已经启动的汽车而当众摔倒在地的，就在我父亲好不容易从地上站起来回到家里的同一天（或者第三天），就收到他儿子的老婆递上的装着我父亲身份证件的小塑料袋并被告知永远别回来了。我2015年一月打电话回家时, 我被那女的告知的是我父亲已经走了。
我父亲当时，至少是在他被推出已经启动的汽车那一刻，是一个中华人民共和国的公民，那有可能一个经过合法选举产生的国家领导人会如此胆大，会有可能在公然违反了中华人民共和国的刑事法法律，犯下刑事罪行却还可以继续做一个中华人民共和国的国家领导人的?
我相信所有这些传言，就是因为我自己在美国生活的亲身经历。我只在1991年见过这个中国李姓总理一次，然后于1996年移居美国。整个中国政府，前一届的和这一届的，都很清楚我从未联系过他，就只是在2015年一月因为广播剧播出的一些故事，给中国纽约总领事馆发过一个电传，告知我正在寻找我所继承的究竟是些什么，那封信里连暗示要求他帮助的意思都没有。（我所继承的钱在美国，我人也在美国，2004年我能在完全不知情的情况下在美国继承财产，我哪里会需要远在中国的任何人帮我找钱啊？）
他是在已经做了一个台湾女人的孩子父亲之后，才在广播剧里播出他的所谓爱情故事，他就是坚持要把我的财产的所有权变成他法律上登记的妻子所有。通过故意混淆谁是他的妻子及谁是他孩子的母亲，他就是坚持要拥有我的财富还公然破坏我的名誉好像是我在死缠着他，其实他想要拥有我的财产才是所有这些中华人民共和国所组织的演出的目的。
我会认为中国总理李克强和中国国家主席习近平所组成的这一届政府有可能是非法组成的政府就是因为他们完全罔顾中国人民共和国是所有中国公民所拥有的，而不是他们共同的心爱女人自己私家拥有的。
我会认为中国总理李克强和中国国家主席习近平所组成的这一届政府有可能是非法组成的政府就是因为他们可能不是由中国的前一届政府推荐选举产生的，因为中国的前一届政府是相信中国是一个法制的国家的政府，是相信中国人民是勤劳勇敢自己挣钱花的政府。
我会认为中国总理李克强和中国国家主席习近平所组成的这一届政府有可能是非法组成的政府就是因为哪有任何一个合法的政府组要通过破坏法律来做一个局，哪里会需要通过做这个局，那个局来得到权力和钱财。更不用说就是一定要让别人掏钱养着，还用一个国家的政府权利及人力物力就是一定要让别人就算不愿意也得拿钱出来？
----2018年1月15日。
听说了一些担心如果我如此之言，那我父亲怎么办？
我的回应：只会好。我所来自的中国人民共和国从来不是什么已经被私家娼妓院替代了的一个中国。
每一个听到过我说话的都知道在2014年12月之前我从未就中国政府的任何对内对外政策发表任何评论，但2015年一月以后我就开始了痛骂中国国家总理李克强以及他的私人生活。
我对于我只见过这个中国总理一面的沉默没能让他的法律上登记结婚的妻子停止向我要钱而是加剧，因为要拥有我的财产的理由是”那是他妻子的钱，而我（程虹）才是他法律登记结婚并有实际上的两性关系的合法妻子，我（程虹）为什么就是不能拥有这些钱？"
而我对于这个中国总理李克强的谩骂虽然向全世界澄清了谁才是他的妻子，但是因为中国政府的正式于2015年参与这个”通过广播剧不经授权的宣布就必须在现实中实际拥有”这么一个伎俩而加剧了这份要挟恐吓要求拥有我所继承财产的压力。
这种通过进行所谓的表演，把”根据法律合法拥有某个财产“的说法替换成“根据与某个男性的性交关系而必须拥有非该男性所拥有的，被其他人所合法拥有的某个财产”的伎俩是我说组织这些演出的根本就是一群篡党夺权团伙的原因。
我自己的亲生经历，那一份需要经历一番苦战才能让我自己合法的钱归我自己合法花的过程，那一份需要经历一份艰难才能夺回我对我自己合法财产的合法控制权的过程，而我自己的这份亲身经历以及我捍卫自己合法权利的一份苦战有一部分是在与中国总理李克强及中国国家主席习近平所领导的中国政府在苦战，是造成我会认为这一届中国政府根本是篡党夺权团伙的原因。区别也就只是不同的权利而已。
----2018年一月15日。
