About Radio Program (VII) -- 关于广播剧（Ⅶ ）
Chinese version
Chronicle Note
**I have not heard one single episode of this radio program myself for a lot of reasons. To do a radio program majorly featuring me was discussed on 07/01/2004 conference call. The radio program has been produced by United States 106.7FM or Clear Channel and on air since 2005??suppose??. I am a Chinese, the major featured person(suppose). Following are what I gathered from impacts of being the major featured person and may not correct. Please contact me at somebodyinMA@gmail.com if the content is seriously incorrect and please provide references including broadcasting channel and time, thanks forward.
----January 12th, 2018
我爸爸的寻人启事，我已联系中领馆并留下我的电话，电邮及住址信息。今天第一次从网上看见。
01-11-2018 Origin of my Private Wealth and My College Education
Heard this morning's broadcasting about my college education.
My response: I speak up here what I heard early last year when I was trying to apply my current MBA with an undergraduate and graduate school records. I sent out 2 emails, multiple addresses each time, but I did not get any response.
It was already rumored around if I had any college education since 2016's radio program announcement from P.R. China's government that Shanghai Medical University was no longer existed (because of name change) but broadcasted with editing technique to produce the public impression of a fake college.
What I heard was Chinese Premiere Li went to Fudan University Shanghai medical college with a group of people one day that is sometime after 2012, and practiced some performing arts of "shred alumni's school records and burn them all". I used records because I heard there were four alumni's school records were destroyed permanently in this way that day. I did not hear how often this way of practicing performing arts had been performed nationwide in the People's Republic of China.
Fudan University Shanghai Medical College is currently addressed at 138 Yixueyuan Rd, Xuhui Qu, Shanghai, P.R. China, it is the same address of the Shanghai First Medical College I was enrolled in 1985 and it is same address of the Shanghai Medical University I graduated from in 1990.
Luckily, like I said this morning, I do not need their lies about my education. Tons of countries can use their own satellite image records to verify my saying of "went to Shanghai Medical University since 1985, went to classrooms and/or test lab daily, and lived daily in an 8-persons a room's student dorm till graduation in 1990."
I also heard similar stories of this kind performing art practicing in the United States. The performing objects were accounting books and related records, the practicing of performing was to shred and burn it all after taken those records out of a safe box. I did tip law enforcement when I heard other related rumors.
I heard tons of rumors this kind. I am apparently completely cured of the anxiety disorder. I am apparently very well protected by the Laws.
----January 11th, 2018
Other rumors I heard about what else this Chinese Premiere Li did in China.
My response: There are tons of rumors about my father.
I speak up here what I have heard:
I heard it was broadcasted on the radio program that my father had walked out of a hospital and went missing, what else I heard was, sometime after that, Chinese Premier Li invited my father to get on to his chauffeur equipped car, but once the car started moving, my father was pushed out when the car door opened. It was in public place with bypassers watching my father fall to the ground. *I heard this was verified from satellite images already.
My father was in his 80s already when this happened (born in 1932).
That is not the only rumor I heard how my father had been abused. I did ask laws help on my father after I heard fake news from my younger brother in 2015. My whereabouts have been well-known in Chinese community since 2004, I should be able to hear any news about my father if the news is important. Chinese Community is not all evils.
----January 11th, 2018
Heard this morning's talk about the origin of my private wealth.
My response: I published this on somebodyinBoston.blogspot.com in 2016.
My family wealth originated from Emperor Private Wealth which was generated by 3% tax collecting. The tax collecting is similar to modern tax laws 1% tax incentive to reward patron's great contribution to regional economic growth. There is no special collecting for this modern 1% incentive tax but reward by the government from already collected tax, the same no special collecting for Emperor 3% tax but 3% of all collected tax transferred into Emperor's private wealth. As modern tax laws to condition tax incentive by evaluating contributions to regional economic growth, being an Emperor to earn this 3% tax as income is not easy at all either. Being the head of an Empire, an Emperor needs to perform the tasks as to keep the Empire in peace, to stimulate economic growth and culture prosperous, to make subjects in Empire happy being Emperor's subjects, to make neighbor countries have no complaint but admire of Empire prosperous., etc. It is never an easy job for a CEO of any company to ensure company keeps growing in fierce competition, it was not easy to achieve these things on a large scale like a big country as China. "Golden Years" and “Keiyuan Spirit" are the performance evaluation given to my ancestor grandfathers by Chinese history. My family wealth origins are, like nowadays government employees paychecks and benefits, well deserved hard earned private wealth. *Note: 3% is an example tax rate. Emperor tax rate was not a fixed value rate but vary by Dynasty and/or by Emperor.
(----published in early 2016)
I repeat what I said this morning in Chinese, all these historic taxes rates and Emperor's share in collected taxes were all recorded in Chinese historical books. I do not need to explain.
It is well-known to all countries that have a government, Royals' private wealth is separated from the Kingdom's Central Bank's Reserve. A state-run company's savings is separated from its CEO's own money. I don't need to explain either.
----January 11th, 2018
关于我私人财富的起源。
我家的财产最早是起源于占税收3%的皇家税。这皇家税的征收办法是和现代税收里的1%增进地区经济发展税是一样的，不另外特别征收，而是从已征收的税收中拨转已征税收总额的3%至皇家私库，属于皇家私有财产。就像现代税收里这1%的奖励税是需要通过特别审批才有资格获得一样，皇家要挣到这3%的皇家税也不容易。作为一国之君，一个皇帝需要做到的事包括：保障帝国的疆域安全，促进帝国的经济发展文化繁荣，让帝国子民快乐幸福而实现国泰民安，让邻国艳羡推崇帝国的繁荣昌盛但不嫉妒怀恨抱怨，等等。就像一个企业的总经理要想在一个竞争激烈的环境里领导企业发展从来就不是一个很容易的事一样，要想在更大的作为一个国家的中国的范畴内有如此成就更是一点都不容易。中国历史上的“贞观之治” 和“开元盛世”就是中国历史对我爷爷们治国表现的推崇。我的私有财富的起源，也就是源自于现代社会所说的政府公务员的工资和福利，都是来自国家征收的税收收入却是100%辛勤工作挣到的合法私人财产。*注：3%的税率是一个假设的数字做解释使用。皇家税率不是固定的，因朝代和皇帝而异。
（----摘自2016年所发表的）
我重复我早上所说的，所有这些历史上的征税税率及皇家税的税率都是历史书上有记载的，不需要我过多解释。
现代很多有政府的国家也都知道，皇室财产不包括帝国中央银行的财富储备。国家所拥有的一家公司的总经理的私人存款账户不包括公司的存款账户。我也不需要过多解释。
----2018年1月11日。
01-10-2018 About this morning's "a mother since 18 years old" and the joke of "Are you sure she has any money"?
Heard this morning's broadcasting of a woman who mothers a rich person's child since 18.
My response: As long as he fathers another woman's child or children, he is a none of my business people. I don't care who that woman might be, young or old, ugly or pretty.
I was never provided by this rich person. I have lived on my own wealth that I inherited from my own birth grandfathers. I don't care how well he can provide for whoever. I am provided well by my own birth grandfathers' blessing.
----January 10th, 2018
Heard this morning's joke about a Mr. Jimmy Geithner.
My response: The joke is because this Jimmy featured in this morning's broadcasting was on July 1st of 2004's meeting as well.
I am the person not sure who is the one I called "my finance guy" which means "my accountant". I was correctly understood by everybody who heard me introducing "I have an accountant" proudly on June 30th and July 1st of 2004. The original wording is "That is my finance guy". I introduced this "my accountant" to a group of Taiwanese after Smartphone related chats on June 30th of 2004.
I heard the person who signed out my providing checks since 2004 that including my $400 Million medical treatments spending and my current housing that I am residing in is the person I assumed my accountant. I am much relaxed now even though I have not received my food & cash providing yet from the same check that covers my current housing.
I did hear this morning's "joke" with the question "Are you sure she has any money?" has happened often and frequently since 2004 to the person I introduced as my accountant. He has been insulted all this time, and I had been agitated to be called a stuck-on beggar all this time.
----January 10th, 2018
The difference between Royals, me and Don Quijote de la Mancha.
My response: Well, I have some ancient titles and wealth entrusted since ancient times but both inherited, not some craziness out of my fancy ideas to practice some ancient-hood.
I did joke about hiring some security guys in my own self-designed uniforms to perform some marching on my own private property, and have all my kids watching this "phenomena" on a balcony with titles I lawfully entitled them.
But there are huge differences between me and Royals, or me and Don Quijote de la Mancha.
Royals are residing in a country with respectful subjects, Royal laws, and Nationally acknowledged Royal Privileges, etc.
I live a modern life in my own properties on the soil of a country I am a same equal citizen of. But I do have some inherited, and ancient, and valid, and lawfully respected titles I can entitle my own children.
Don Quijote de la Mancha lived in his own invented fantasy of practicing knighthood in his adventures.
----January 10th, 2018
01-09-2018 All About my Imperial Ancestry and My Royal Titles
Heard this morning's broadcasting if I am the heir of Tang dynasty Emperor Taizong of Tang or just an Imperial offspring.
My response: I am the heir of Chinese Emperor Taizong of Tang.
----January 9th, 2018
Heard the confusion expressed this morning is the Chinese tradition of Firstborn Son Inheriting Custom.
My response: First Born Son inheriting is not the custom of Chinese Emperors' family.
West Han dynasty (西汉, 206BC - 8AD）, East Han dynasty（东汉, 25AD-220AD）, Tang dynasty（唐朝, 618AD - 907AD）, Yuan dynasty（元朝, originated from Genghis Khan， 1279AD-1368AD) and Qing dynasty（清朝, 1644AD-1911AD） were having own inheriting rules that were not according to the firstborn son inheriting custom, especially Tang dynasty, Yuan dynasty and Qing dynasty are well known not firstborn inheriting. I do not know if Yuan dynasty or Qing dynasty had female heir disguised in male's appearance to inherit. I am the female heir of Tang dynasty Emperors and I had a grandmother crowned herself a Wuzhou Empress with the support from her Tang dynasty Emperor husband's heir son (my grandfather). Her Emperor husband was Emperor Gaozong of Tang（唐高宗李治）
http://www.yutopian.com/history/
西漢 (West Han dynasty)
(1) 漢高祖 劉邦 (前206-前195) (my grandfather)
(2) 漢惠帝 劉盈 (前194-前188)
(3) 漢高后 呂雉(漢少帝 劉恭，漢少帝 劉弘) (前187-前180) (a wife)
(4) 漢文帝 劉恆 (前179-前157)（竇皇后）(a wife)
(5) 漢景帝 劉啟 (前156-前141)
(6) 漢武帝 劉徹 (前140-前87) (possibly my grandfather, 东汉的开国皇帝是光武帝)
(7) 漢昭帝 劉弗陵 (前86-前74)
(8) 漢宣帝 劉詢 (前73-前49)
(9) 漢元帝 劉爽 (前32-前7)
(10) 漢成帝 劉驁 (前32-前7)
(11) 漢哀帝 劉欣 (前6-前1)
(12) 漢平帝 劉衍 (1-5)
(13) 孺子 劉嬰 (6-8)
http://www.kmuh.org.tw/www/drgga/www/C.H/CH02.htm)
----January 9th, 2018
Heard this morning's talk about Beauty Da （Daji?).
My response: Now everybody already familiar with PRC80 style talk.
What this morning broadcasted was: It was not because of her blood or there is an ancient painting to prove that she resembles the Beauty Da ( Daji?, 1766 to 1122 BC).(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shang_dynasty)
She is a "real beauty Da(Daji)" is because her lovers appreciated her with the words copied from a Chinese historic book that described the Beauty Da(Daji)".
----January 9th, 2018
Heard this morning's broadcasting of a grandmother's wish.
My response: This morning's broadcasting is not from the British Crown Prince William.
I don't care what that male's grandmother's wish is. I refuse to consider any romance possibility with that male.
I did not hear British Crown Prince William had made such saying. And the rumors about possible children between me and the British Crown Prince, which has been clarified untrue already, was because I am the owner of the British East India Company Financier.
I reject any idea to match me with a male who is an old man to another woman's child or children already.
I was born with Royal titles with handsome wealth that set up together with my trusts. I do not need to consider matrimony to advance myself financially or socially, and I already worked very hard and already advanced myself academically very good.
I refuse to consider any romance with anyone that can be described as Old even that is a male of 20 years of age but a biological father of another woman's child already.
I do have a huge problem with the Radio company's management called-in all these people to produce such dry-cries of themselves to broadcast on a public channel's radio program.
----January 9th, 2018
How can a Royal title be set up with a Trust?
My response: Well, as part of the gift, as long as that is from an Emperor or a ruling Empress.
I am the first girl in 2500 years who shares my Emperors grandfathers birthmark.This family birthmark became my family's heir birthmark since East Han (25AD). This is the reason I received some trusts as gifts from my grandfathers.
It is publicly well known that a King or a Queen can entitle a subject, but the highest title in a hierarchy system that is equivalent to King or Queen can only be titled to themselves, or gift to the Crown Prince or Crown Princess with the condition set as valid upon inheriting.
I don't know if my ancient Emperor grandfathers had entitled themselves that can be inherited which I can refer to as family titles to differentiate with those associated with the Crown or the Emperium, and I don't know if my father had given-up his inheritable family titles at the same time he gave up his financial inheritable that made my grandfather had no choice but gifted all to me, I did inherit Emperor or Empress equivalent titles (such as Ingonyama) on June 30th of 2004 with the wealth that set up together in those trusts I inherited on June 30th of 2004.
----January 9th, 2018
01-08-2018 Loud and Clear is the "Voice of the Law People" and "a Mother's Obligation"
Heard this morning's broadcasting of "the voice of the law people"
My response: I am thrilled to hear "the voice of the law people" is now loud and clear on the radio program.
----January 8th, 2018
Heard this morning's talk about my biological children is a pair of my true statements.
My response: It is my obligation to tell the entire world they are my beloved.
----January 8th, 2018
Heard yesterday's talk of a Chinese Mr. Li.
My response: I heard this Mr.Li is a 3rd cousin to me by DNA test result which means his great-grandfather was my great-grandfather's half-brother. Mr. Li is very proud that his great-grandfather was one of the earliest group of students that studied in France and became earliest members of Chinese Communist Party.
I did not hear his great-grandfather had any inheriting abroad related rumors. My inheriting or my inherited wealth has nothing to do with this Mr. Li or his great-grandfather.
I heard his great-grandfather's hostility against my grandfather was a major reason that my grandfather was not popular among those earliest members of Chinese Communist Party. My grandfather decided to entrust wealth abroad was from the concern of widespread rumors that after 1949's liberation, " Chinese government would buy private wealth at the price that would be equivalent as private wealth had filed bankruptcy".
----January 8th, 2017
Heard this morning's talk about Rockefeller and O'Connor name.
My response: I heard it is from some American Rockefellers and some American O'Connors, together with an American Jessica Petroves and an American David Petroves that forbid the public to be aware that I have my own biological children.
It is my obligation to tell all these people that these two children do have a mother willing to let the entire world know that those participating Rockefellers and O'Connors have to be pig-borns to be so confused that these two children are never theirs to manage or to have any saying over. This is regarding the "insist-on efforts" to express the opinion of "should raise these two children in monk style living forever".
One of the rumors is there is a Miss, parented by an American Rockefeller and an American O'Connor, is in financial desperation that frantically intend to pick up a left-over old man who fathers these two children and truly consider this would be a huge financial victory if succeed because pretending rich means nothing practical. I say, if so, why not make it public that is just a beggar-raised Miss Poor. The only curiosity left is, why this she would think she is eligible to have this fake name-power to be in another person's consideration of matrimony? That is not a practical consideration at all but a stupid enough one.
Another related rumor is an American David Petroves is a cousin to an American Jessica Petroves. The funny thing about this rumor is this Jessica Petroves shares the same mother with her half-sister Jessica Lissettes (radio Jessica) but looks like identical twins. The rumor is the mother had two birth of twins, but the 4 girls look like quadruplets. How two children from the same mother but a different father can look so identical? If you haven't heard, the rumor is the famous Duane-Reade pharmacist like to practice the performing art of "magically hol-hol-raise a chair" with his 4 identical looking girls at outdoor space often.
I heard this "Jessica Petroves", not sure which one in these two twins, kept on insisting to have this saying or that saying over my anything, I say I can't understand why she can insist on as if she has this power from I would want her sexuality desperately. I reject her illusion like such and I refuse to let anyone encourage her psycho fantasy like such.
The third related rumor, all these names have some power that related to "glass house cancer". I did call law enforcement's help regarding a lot of similar rumors.
----January 8th, 2018
01-07-2018 Chinese government inveighs me "fake" to rob my intellectual making and harm me biologically to rob my inheritances? (中国政府痛骂我 “假冒伪造” 是想掠夺我的智慧产权, 伤害我的身体健康是为了抢劫我所继承的财产？）
Heard this morning's broadcasting of why don't you explain to the Chinese government in Chinese? (中文附后)
Heard this morning's broadcasting of me accusing Chinese military's participation of harming my health.
----January 7th, 2018
For one, there had no single case of any media coverage of any government officials involved major corruption case that could cause this massive violent anger expression among college students.
To protect deployed through advanced technology and medical technology as much as possible was also a major part of those orders I gave to U.S. Military Supply Corp as an active-enlisted U.S. Military 3-Stars General Strategist on July 1st of 2004.
**I am truly happy that I heard on January 8th of 2018: From satellite image records, there were protesters walked out of Tiananmen square alive after Chinese military's shooting out on June 4th of 1989. Please verify this information. (----January 8th, 2018)
**Some said, the Chinese government couldn't public the records of the 1989's College's teleconference is because there were some scary conversations that some anonymous people insisted on Chinese government needs to pay big money to govern protesting students. I say if you have heard radio program's 2017 Christmas times two weeks broadcasting, you know this is not scary but
Do you hear what I hear? Is that an Alzheimer or a psycho?( Third Item)
(----January 8th, 2018)
听说了今天早上的广播提到了1989年的学生运动及1950中华人民共和国的私有财产公有化。
我的回应：我再加一些我在中国时听说的：
1978年，中国的国家主席邓小平号召“让一部分人先富裕起来”。
1980年代，中国政府公布了一系列政策“让一些人可以购买效益不好的企业（公司工厂）。” 那些可以让私人购买的公司工厂很多都是效益不好面临倒闭的公司工厂。
我听说了做这样的选择是出于保障主要的经济体制可以健康来稳定绝大多数中国人民的利益。
01-06-2018 Some Issues of My Intellectual Incomes--Radio Program's Producing Team and Albert Gore
Heard this morning's broadcasting of the argument why my mother needs to survive?
My response: This is the question similar to why I have to be homeless or my father needs to survive?
I heard that on July 1st of 2004, the person advised that I needed to be homeless is the same person advised that my mother needs to survive. This same person also advised that my father should not be united with me if intend to live longer.
The person's name is Fang, Zhiqiang( 方志强), this Fang, Zhiqiang ( 方志强) has no biological association with my father, my mother or I. I heard he was invited into the July 1st of 2004's meeting or offered the microphone on July 1st of 2004's meeting by Albert Gore. I heard this Fang, Zhiqiang ( 方志强) was once featured on the radio program as a possible heir from Zu's family(明朝朱家) and I heard that same episode cleared it is untrue by Zu's family.
I heard my father in the current needs-to-survive situation is because of Chinese Premier Li. Chinese Premier Li is rumored an in-law to Fang, Zhiqiang( 方志强)
----January, 6th, 2018
Why Albert Gore's name is in all these?
My response: I was told he got a key to enter my locked-door self-paid apartment to have sex with me during my sound sleep. And I was told in the same meeting later that his friend uploaded an evidence video clip of this on the internet for at least several minutes.
I doubted that in 2004 very much because I knew for certain that I had checked if my apartment door locked before I went to bed daily. It means Albert Gore had raped me if what I was told is true and it means I was threatened if I dare to say I was never a whore at all to this Albert Gore.
I came from an Emperors' family that I knew what this means to the person I never even met in person. Other than a possible chance in 2001 or 2002 that he was with a political campaign group visited my complex in Corona, NY, I never met Albert Gore. That group was a 4-persons group that includes 2 Chinese. One of the two is John Liu(刘醇逸)。They only stayed in my building's hallway outside my apartment for less than 5 minutes and I only saw them for less than one minute. I did not recognize anybody in that group at that moment.
I chose to do something necessary about the internet broadcasting of the rape video but tried to leave some room in case there was something fishy. That was the reason I asked his uncle's and his father's law firms to represent one of my inheritance Fund.
I needed to have new attorneys on that day was because my misunderstanding on why I was neglected to constant crying when I was in Janus Associates, a computer consulting company in Connecticut. I did realize in 2016 that I directed my anger wrongfully to the female attorney in 2004 and I sincerely apologize to her here again, this time is also from my understanding that let me safe inherit my trusts is more important than help to stop my cries.
I heard Albert Gore was the person kept complaining that U.S. Military should not let me giving those orders to Supply Corp on July 1st of 2004.
I have to say I was an in-service 3-Stars U.S. Military General Strategist on that day and I gave out my orders to U.S. Military Supply Corp when all the U.S. Military 5-Stars and 4-Stars Generals were presented. I was authorized to make all those requests because they all knew I was doing so as a U.S. Military's Strategist on an assignment to improve U.S. Military's combat capabilities. That was the reason I could give out my orders to U.S. Military's Supply Corp when I was a U.S. Military's combat officer.
I was a citizen of the People's Republic of China on that day, but there was no war or interest conflicts at all between the People's Republic of China and the United States on that day. All those requests were not aimed to weaken the People's Republic of China's Military's combat capabilities.
I have nothing to do with Albert Gore. I rejected to have any romantic possibilities with Albert Gore even in-jokes on July 1st of 2004. I have some huge problems with Albert Gore currently because his name is on almost all these issues I have kept complaining and I have kept asking Law Enforcement's help.
----January 6th, 2018
Heard this morning's broadcasting of "Who the fxxx you think you are".
My response: I heard that were from four most famous American-Chinese movie stars: Joan Chen(陈冲), Lucy Liu( 刘玉玲), Bai Ling(白灵), and Vivian Wu(邬君梅).
I do not know why they are so angry since they all aware I was never in movie or TV industry. I only have this radio program which I never participated any producing efforts. My relationship with the entertainment industry is just being an investor.
This is the same reason nobody doubted that I have nothing to do with another famous Chinese famous movie star Zhang Ziyi's(章子怡) romance stories in 2009 or so.
And this is the same reason that I am currently in this situation that my own radio program has been the reason I have been shited all over.
----January 6th, 2018
About this radio program producing-share and my share of being a major featured person.
My response: This has been the major hurdle of understanding the anger towards me from a lot of literature persons.
It was broadcasted some time ago that some writers could not understand why it is half-half on intellectual income share-split between my and producing team. Fiction writers never need to pay for anybody inspired their books. Why I am paid handsomely?
The difference is fiction writers are just inspired by the story, this radio program is to produce my story. It is similar to the difference between a script-writer and fiction-writer. The script-write writes based on fiction-writer fiction, this producing team produce based on stories of my life and my video-audio materials from recordings of my life that I provided.
The producing team's proud is different with my proud, it is similar to the different proud that script-writer has when the movie is based on a popular best-seller.
I heard there are at least two professions, by laws, are not allowed to be creative: Accounting Profession and Law profession. Both will be facing federal and state felony charges if dare to build-up an accounting book or build-up a case.
This is maybe the reason it has been very hard for my attorneys to understand what all these anger towards me are about: According to laws and regulations, half-half on intellectual income share-split between my and radio program's producing team already means I have not been participating any radio program's producing efforts at all.
A reference to this, the literature person in this illustration is the script-writer:
Heard about confusion how intellectual contributions can be appropriately acknowledged and rewarded.
My response: I use a very publicly familiar group of people, movie producing team, to illustrate this.
I have this great idea this "blah blah" can be a great movie;
A literature person agreed and write a script from my "blah blah" story.
A person who knows how to make a movie agreed and called in a group to make a movie.
This group of people includes a movie director, actresses and actors and supporting staff.
My "blah blah" story thus turned into a very popular movie.
I am so proud I am the creator of this movie that attracted so many people.
The literature person is so proud of being the scriptwriter that wrote so many great lines.
The producer is so proud this is a popular movie.
The group of people is so proud of the directing, or the roles they played, or the settings/costumes designed, etc.
Who contributed what, or how well contributed, or what is the appropriate reward is all very clear to all of us that participated this turns "blah blah" into a popular movie.
It is the same in manufacturing industries or service-providing industries.
----Dec. 8th, 2017
----January 6th, 2017
01-05-2018 This morning's two Chinese children and confusion of Creator of Beijing Olympic Opening (今天早上的两个中国小孩以及谁是北京奥运会创意人的困扰）
Heard about this morning's broadcasting of two children. （中文附后）
My response: They are both People's Republic of China's citizens, their parents are as they announced. The British East Indy Company Financier is not the Fund I own.
I own the British East India Company Financier Fund and my children are U.S. citizens who can pronounce the differentiation between "India" and "Indy".
It is rumored they were invited by a Jessica whose husband had met me in a Hyatt Regional Hotel's Bar on the next day I met a group of U.S. military officers in 2003. He made some comments about if I have a dancer's body in 2004 that bothers this Jessica very much.
----January 5th, 2018
Heard about this morning's broadcasting of helping me manage my money.
My response: I do have accountants and business representatives helping me managing my investments.
I did make such a joke in 2004 or in 2007 that I can let my father managing my allowance to let him satisfy some craving of spending some money but spending has to be according to my instructions, I joked about this in more than one occasions including saying it to my father himself. But on each occasion, I made it very clear it is my own biological lawful father I was joking about, never anyone else.
I enjoy teasing my own father, I heard that is how my ancient grandfather(李隆基） had enjoyed teasing my beauty grandmother（杨玉环). It is the teasing between me and my own birth father.
I heard someone says why don't I let myself be teased by whoever? I respond it with:"Who the Fxxx do you think you are? I send you to the court every time you try, civil or criminal, ."
Now I am announcing here that I changed my mind about it. I refuse to let anyone manage my any non-investment money which includes my allowance.
----January 5th, 2018
About rumored confusion of who is the creator of Beijing Olympic Opening.
My response: I heard the confusion is from a video CD that was broadcasted on the radio in China. The female in that video CD dressed in Chinese ancient style, not sure if voice data is the same as mine. This can be checked by forensic technology(司法鉴定), voice or recorded time. Mine was done and should be recorded in June of 2004.
I heard mine was recorded in June of 2004 by FBI during their investigation of possible intellectual properties related case that I reported in January of 2004, and I heard it was an FBI agent who gave the copy of this recording to the Chinese Consulate in New York City.
I think the Chinese producing team of the Beijing Olympic Opening/Closing Ceremony, the group of people who have been very familiar with performing arts, know the difference between the voice of a creator or a voice of a performing actress. The difference between the video images is the same.
I created those ideas from the Chinese culture that I brought up with and I have lived my life by, instead of creating some ideas from what I thought should be introduced to the world according to what Chinese have achieved over the history. I was introducing the Chinese culture that has made me a being of a Chinese.
I created those ideas from the depth of my understanding of the Chinese culture that the mimic performer won't be able to reproduce. It was not the confidence or just the passion in the voice that makes the difference but the true reflection that I have the in-depth knowledge of what I was talking about. The video images are the same.
A performing artist won't have that reflection of the knowledge in the voice that a person who has the knowledge can have, no matter how well this performing artist can mimic the person who has the knowledge.
----January 5th, 2018
有关谁是奥运会创意人的争议是怎么回事？
我的回应：听说了奥运会创意人的困扰是来自一盘影碟，这影碟2008年北京奥运会之前有在中国国内的广播电台里播出过。影碟里的女性身着中式衣服或者中式古装，不清楚声音资料是否还是我方敏的。但这是可以通过司法鉴定来查实的， 不管是声音或是录制时间（可以精确到千分之一秒）都有技术可以鉴定。我是在2004年6月的一个星期天做的北京奥运会的创意，录影录音时间也应该是同一天。
我听说我的创意是在2004年6月由联邦调查局在调查由我于2004年1月举报的一桩有关智慧产权的案件时录制的，我听说是由一个联邦调查局的探员把这段录影（录音）交给了纽约的中国领事馆。
我认为北京奥运会开幕式及闭幕式的创作团队，是非常熟悉什么是表演艺术的一群人，他们很清楚一个创意人创意时的声音和一个演员在表演这个场景时的声音之间的区别。两者影像资料之间的区别也是如此。
我的那些创意是从伴随我成长以及每天生活着的中国文化中所产生的创意，不是我看着中国的历史年鉴表上所记录的中国历史上的伟大成就而选择了一些我认为应该介绍给世界人民所孕育的创意。我当时是在介绍让我方敏成为了一个华人的这么一个中国文化。
我的创意是源自我对中国文化的理解程度，不是一个演员的表演可以模仿重现的。这份区别不是在声音里的那份自信或者一些激情，而是这声音真实反映了我确实拥有我所谈论的这个中国文化的相关知识以及我拥有什么程度中国文化知识的那一份深度感。影像资料也是如此。
不管一个表演艺术家如何模仿，一个表演艺术家的声音里没有可能会有一个真正拥有知识者的声音里所能呈现的那份真实的有深度的知识感。
----2018年1月5日。
01-04-2018 Why all these willingness to pay for someone to trash me?
Heard this morning's broadcasting of my gifts been thrown out.
My response: I did hear this rumor before yesterday and I did send out a message asking if the dumplings I made as a gift would be thrown out. Anyway, she threw as she wishes and I did get the point this is not the person need my gift or my companionship.
Also, I heard this morning a Mr. Petroves announced $1000 monthly providing each to the same person and another person, it is of course as he wishes as long as that is this Mr. Petroves own money. This Mr. Petroves does not represent my inheritance Fund and he should not have his individual capital account in my inheritance Fund (agreed-upon providing is not in an individual's name but in the family name, one payment in full per year). He has no access to my money unless he makes an inappropriate phone call to the F holding's investor American Fund which is a British Fund's child Fund, and a French Fund's grandchild Fund. My capital accounts are not in these Funds but in my trusts that set up these Funds, and I did call law enforcement's help on a lot of rumored inappropriate phone calls of performing-arts of demanding money from business-spending-budget that made by some other people already.
The only curiosity is why this Mr. Petroves would willing to give money out to reward this two person who is willing to throw out my $20-$40 or so gifts. I only gave out two gifts this year. The other person is the one I adopted my cat from($150 adoption) last year. If he is a brother to a Jessica Petroves, why would this wealthy Mr. Petroves let his sister a Mistress equivalent to another wealthier person? I received this responding message:
This is the message I sent this morning after I heard rumors about radio broadcasting and I did remove the entry from my contact list: "Hello, I am so sorry I am not going to continue my Bible study with you. And I knew I made a very inappropriate promise yesterday about if I have money I will help you to have your own biological child while you are very certain I should not, so I take every word back. Please remove me from your contact list as I am doing now. Thanks for all those past Wednesdays"
I received this responding message: "I don’t understand what you mean. I never said that you shouldn’t have your own biological child! I would never impose on you like that. Frankly, I’m too old for a child, biological or otherwise... Well, I apologize for any misunderstanding we may have had. It saddens me that we can’t have a conversation about it. However, as you wish. Truly, It’s been my pleasure to introduce you to the Creator of the Heavens and the earth. Take care of yourself ".
Heard this morning's argument about Petroves'(Pejoves?) money.
----January 4th, 2018
Heard the rumor there is a British entrusting attorney of mine is a notorious person's in-law.
My response: That person is notorious for organizing this shit-me-all over to make illegal financial gains. This rumored British entrusting attorney is most likely part of such scheme as well because this rumored attorney is expected to have the power to give out my money. Last year or so, there were some members of Chinese my inheritances supervision committee insisted on having saying over my spending, possibly the same scheme.
----January 4th, 2018
About so many confusions regarding my biological children.
My response: I did make my points on Boston 96.9FM in November or December of 2015 when it was rumored he is not good enough to be his father's heir and anyone who is willing can be called the father of my biological children.
My point I made was: If he does not need to be his own biological father's heir and he does not need to be the person who father my biological children, who he should be or where and how this radio program intend to place him? I add my explanation about my point here: Is this means he can just be a worker with a new name to work in a factory to make some minimum wage for some food on the table? Also, who should be his replacement to his wealthy birth father? With all these confusion if I have biological children and who should be their father, exactly, who needs all these confusion and what is the purpose?
I have my own personal experience of how I should not enjoy my own hard-earned intellectual making or my own birth grandfather' hard-earned money I inherited, but to work in some restaurant for some food and live a beggar's life as you all heard from the radio program. I did call law enforcement's help constantly with this kind of personal experiences.
For my own experiences, it is rumored that there is a radio program's director, a Shanghainese, who thinks that I do not need anything at all to be my ancient Emperor grandfather's heir. And I did respond to this rumor that this Shanghainese director certainly does not need his biological limbs (his arms & his legs) as well as his hip section with his buttocks and his penis) at all to be a director of this radio program and beyond.
It also rumored that this Shanghainese director is an in-law to the female who mothers several most important Chinese national leaders' only child. The rumor means the only child for each most important person, of course.
----January 4th, 2018
01-03-2018 Sexual harassment is a Crime for very good reasons and who my father and grandfather resemble (性骚扰是犯罪行为及我爷爷和我父亲长得像谁？）
Heard this morning's broadcasting about not privileged to shit his relative no matter how agitated I am.（中文附后）
About my Ancestors featured in those paintings that were published in 2011 or so.
My response: There were four paintings published with year-certificate displayed as 1 year's old to tell they were just copies. Those painters copied them from originals' digital copies.
One of the huge problems I have with this administration of People's Republic of China's government is that a disk contains digital copies of all those published has been sent to them before those copied paintings were published. I had mentioned this on Boston 96.9FM in 2015 time.
In that disk, there were 6 painting featured with its originals' year-certificate and detailed zoom-ins to present techniques used in those paintings which certainly can be identified by historians who are specialized on these.
I am excited this morning because I heard the two not-published paintings included in that disk were to present my father's(方文海） resemblances to my ancient grandfather Emperor Xuanzong of Tang (唐玄宗李隆基）in that 6 boys painting. That generation there were 6 Princes. The other one who featured 4 Princes was to present my grandfather(方智仁）resembled my ancient grandfather Emperor Gaozong of Tang(唐高宗李治). If anyone can verify this would be really great.
I was like I finally realized that no wonder my father is known for blind-equivalent because of nearsighted with Retinal detachments since I was in high school, it is because I resemble extremely to the beautiful wife of my ancient grandfather Emperor Xuanzong of Tang (唐玄宗李隆基) who he resembles extremely.
My poor old man, he had been stationed in desserts alone when he was an enlisted bachelor surveyor-cartographer. After he has me, it has been all about what I want and how to stop me from squirring I want this or that, things I wanted had been ranged from food to everything else. I heard recently when he is already in his 80s, he was asked if he could recall any achievements from his profession of Astrophysics. And I published on this blog to tell him that I am his provider that providing him the same as myself on medical health related even that is our shared grandfathers' money I inherited. He knows I am the daughter he can live on.
----January 3rd, 2018
关于2011年左右发布的我祖先的画像。
我的回应：2011年左右广播剧相关网站发布过4张附有标明只有一年的年份证书的临摹油画。画家们是按照原版画像的电子版本临摹的。
我对中华人民共和国这一届政府很大的投诉就是我有听说中国政府在这几张油画临摹板本公布之前是有收到原版的附有原版年份鉴定电子版本碟盘的。我2015年在波士顿96.9FM有提到这点。
在那盘碟子里，一共有六张油画的电子版本，都附有原版油画的年份鉴定证明，及可放大的细节以展示唐代画法及技巧以供画史研究人员鉴别鉴定真伪。
我今天早上很开心的听说那两张没有公布的油画是为了展示我父亲方文海长的像极了在那张6个兄弟的画像里的唐玄宗李隆基，而另一张4个兄弟的油画像是为了展示我的爷爷方智仁像极了画像里的唐高宗李治。要是有人能证实这点就太好了。
我感觉就像恍然大悟了一般，怪道从我高中开始，我父亲就是有名的高度近视眼加视网膜剥离，什么也看不清，原来是因为我这个女儿长的像极了唐玄宗爷爷的美女妻子，而他这个父亲自己长得像极了唐玄宗李隆基爷爷。
我可怜的老爸爸，他年轻单身的时候是驻扎在沙漠当测绘兵。等他有了我这个女儿以后，就一直是围绕着我想要什么或者怎么才能让我不扯着嗓门的要这要那，而我想要的东西，那是吃的喝的用的什么都想要。我最近还听说在他已经80多岁的现在，他还被别人讥讽他作为天体物理学家有过什么职业上的成就没有啊？（听说就是北京天文台的那几个人，其中一个就是那个一口咬定是“头胎女儿”的妈妈）。而我还在这个博客里和他说虽然我所继承的信托是由我们共同的爷爷们设立的，但信托是设立给我的，所以钱是我的，所以是我在出钱养他并且很愿意让他有和我一样规格的医疗健康供给。不过他知道他是可以非常安心地靠我这个女儿养着的。
----2018年1月3日。
01-02-2017 About my investment in China and 我当然会说这些话啊。（中文附后）
Heard this morning's talk about my possible investment in China should be destroyed even if run by local Chinese.
My response: With this morning's broadcasting, and regarding rumored People's Republic of China's government would block my inheritance Funds to invest in China, I publish here what I had published on my school MBA506 discussion board two or three months ago: If my investment in China means business only needs to get very busy with tons of nesses but definitely not the profits, and my capital account in the investment means deserved to reduce against my wish, blocking my inheritance Funds to invest in China can only be understood by me as Financial Security provided. I am adding here with: it may be an extreme measure in orange colored (maybe even red colored) alarming circumstances caused by a possibly severely corrupted government. I also said in this web blog some days ago that it sounds like a criminal gang insists on calling themselves a government but specialized in performing illegal whore business, bilking and threatening for money in excuse of severe jealousy caused by self-illusion-ed fake romances, etc.
----January 2nd, 2018
我当然会说这些话啊。
我的回应：我是有说过：“我就等着中华人民共和国的子弹射进他们的脑门里。”
整个方敏事件，就是因为中华人民共和国的一些人不学无术，不懂什么是智慧产权，似乎也完全不懂任何公司账目上的任何钱财从来不是一个两个高级经理可以随便以智慧产权收入为理由任意送人的（美国没有小金库，财会审计也很严格），却坚持自己就是乐意，就是够资格指手划解说三道四，外加就是想通过“协助将方敏所继承的合法财产非法换个主人”要点钱而已，闹得天翻地覆。
就美国公民阿尔伯特·高尔公然利用广播剧破坏方敏名誉以掠夺方敏智慧产权收入，方敏已寻求美国警方协助要求将方敏我自己挣的智慧产权收入的每一分钱都按照法律归方敏我自己拥有， 中国政府方面可向美国联邦调查局核查是否已立案处理。
其实就我方敏是否有挣到这么多的智慧产权收入就只需核查“贡献是否确实是方敏所做，方敏所做贡献奖励是否恰当”就可以，完全就只是美国的智慧产权相关法律管辖范围，却是由中国政府出面就此对方敏进行漫天泼屎喷粪的羞辱谩骂造谣诽谤的破坏名誉行为。
中国政府还以我在中华人民共和国长大从未拥有财产为名坚称我是假冒伪造，完全罔顾中华人民共和国自1949年以来所实施的不允许合法私有财产及一切财富归全民所有制的事实，也完全不予考虑我方敏所强调的我所继承信托是在1949年中国大陆解放之前就已信托国外的事实，甚至不允许已成为美国公民的我方敏拥有任何合法子女甚至任何婚姻家庭子女已达到让我方敏”断子绝孙无以为继”来协助掠夺我方敏所继承财产的目的，造成方敏事件如此地步。我方敏那有可能不说这些话呢？
至于今天早上提到的我同父同母弟弟的婚姻家庭，在我和我弟弟的婚姻家庭有法律范畴内的矛盾纠纷时，我方敏永远选择在乎生我养我的父亲方文海母亲王博贤更多一些，我方敏永远选择在乎我自己的亲生子女更多一些，我方敏永远选择捍卫我方敏自己及我方敏自己亲生子女的合法权益。我弟弟的婚姻子女是我弟弟的责任和义务，永远都不是我的责任和义务。我方敏永远都认为拥有亲情是在拥有自己的合法权益的基础之上的。
听说中国的一群老妇女对英国威廉王子可能和我育有子女传闻闹吃醋造成方敏事件整个就是一起由中华人民共和国政府组织主导的中华人民共和国的女性公民们的国际卖淫活动。
我所知道的是：方敏我2004年所继承的信托及信托所投资的基金中包括英国的东印度公司投资基金和英国的另几家基金，其中的东印度公司投资基金和另一家基金近一两百年以来都一直是由英国王储代为表达英国王室想要拥有的基金，基金工作人员也一直是被数代英国王储们粗暴对待着以表达不能合法拥有的不满。所以当我2004年继承并合法拥有这两家英国基金时，才会有很多人愿意相信英国王储威廉王子可能和我婚娶通过由我所出的下一代英国王储可以让英国王室合法拥有这两个英国人为之深为骄傲的基金而引发我和英国威廉王子可能育有子女传言。
英国王室及英国政府已就此类传言作出澄清，我方敏就是不明白这关中国政府什么事？还需要由中国政府出面羞辱谩骂方敏以表达华人就是不配和英国王室有婚姻子女关系，这哪里还是一届代表着13亿中国公民的华人政府啊？
----2017年1月2日
01-01-2018 Happy New Year
To my own biological children:
Happy New Year, my dearest darlings, my sweethearts.
To my own children's father and grandparents:
Happy New Year!
To everyone who I owe my BIG THANKS for their caring and love towards my own children:
Happy New Year!
To my own birth father:
Happy New Year!
老爸爸， 新年快乐！
To my own birth mother who I wish with all my heart can still alive and read this blog:
Happy New Year!
妈妈，真心希望你还在，能听到我对你说“祝你新年快乐！”
妈妈：如果你还在，不用担心你的生活供给，女儿我在2004年7月1日我办理信托我所继承到爷爷们给我设立的那些信托基金时就态度很好的表态说你的生活当然是有我负责啦，我当天当时就决定了你的生活供给和老爸爸是同等规格的，着重身体健康和基本生活保障。你从来就不是我的负担。😇😇
老爸爸：回顾我的财产继承，我最感谢的是你和爷爷方智仁。
要不是方智仁爷爷小时候成天扯着个嗓门要把家里的东西都给捐了，曾祖父也不会赶着紧得就把那些好东西全办理信托给我了。
要不是你把爷爷方智仁给你的亲笔遗嘱信看也不看就给扔了，让亲眼看见你扔了遗嘱信的爷爷方智仁像热锅上的蚂蚁似的在病床坚持了整整一个月，我小时候的日子会好点，我来美国留学也不用打餐馆，可我就没有机会在2004年7月1日态度很好的表态说：老爸爸的生活当然是有我负担啦。我当时就说了就凭我自己挣的钱都够， 你和妈妈的健康医疗供给和我是同等规格。
还有，如果有人问，我所继承的那些信托里是否有方家其他人的钱，你就回答说没有。就像爷爷方智仁1965年在上海去世前有给你们兄弟姊妹每人一份亲笔信及银行定期存折之类的一样，每一代爷爷去世前都有给他自己下一代所有儿子交代后事及分配财产，每一代都如此。我方敏拿到的爷爷们替我设立的那些信托都是爷爷们另外给我的，没有方家任何其他人的钱在里面。我是家里从2500年前至今唯一的一个女孩有着家里的继承胎记掌纹。
还有，我们家曾祖父之前的爷爷们可能有一些已改了家族姓氏的其他房的子女。我拿到的钱和他们也是一点关系都没有。
还有，就是听说北京天文台有一对夫妻，1975年左右在北京为你替我买了一条￥7元的裙子和你吵得很凶说您凭什么不给他们的女儿也买条裙子的那对，他们的女儿就跟中了邪一样，认定她自己是你未婚所生的一个女儿，就是因为她自己听说了你在她妈妈怀上她的前一周有去北京出差（1965年）。不过不用担心了。我听说已经查了当年的卫星影像资料，你在整个出差期间都没有拜访过她母亲本人或者她母亲的办公室。我还没弄明白他们夫妻俩为什么就认为你应该替他们女儿买条裙子。做妈妈的应该很清楚她自己的女儿和你一点关系都没有啊。听说他们这个女儿还凶得很，铁了心的说是“长女”就是要就我的一切事物做决定并且还不需要我知道甚至听说她都决定了些什么。如果是真，我是一点不会客气，一切交给我自己的律师按法律处理。
听说了今天早上的广播谈到来自中华人民共和国的困扰说为什么那是我的基金。
我的回应：那是根据我自己祖爷爷的界定。让我来解释一下。
我的祖爷爷（我爷爷A），也就是设立这个信托的那个人在他的信里（遗嘱里）界定了一个由他自己的哪个儿子（我爷爷B）所出的家族继承胎记一支的一个有着家族继承胎记的女儿是这个信托的唯一受益人。遗嘱信中所界定的那个儿子（我爷爷B）是一个有家族继承胎记的儿子。
我爷爷B，也就是我爷爷A在他自己所立遗嘱里所界定的继承人儿子，没有生出一个有继承胎记的女儿而是生了一个有继承胎记的儿子（我爷爷C）。所以，我爷爷B就通知了那些照看着这个信托的人，这个信托的继承胎记女受益人将是由他这个有继承胎记的儿子（我爷爷C）这支所出的。
就这样一代又一代，直到我爷爷方智仁这一代。我的父亲方文海是我爷爷方智仁所出的有继承胎记的儿子。所以我爷爷方智仁就通知了那些照看着这个信托的人，这个信托的继承胎记女受益人将是由他这个有继承胎记的儿子方文海这支所出的。
我是1967年出生，我的家族胎记掌纹和我父亲方文海的胎记掌纹几乎是一摸一样的。
这是为什么我说我是按照我祖爷爷（我爷爷A）的遗嘱继承了我祖爷爷（我爷爷A）所设立的这个信托。那个基金是由我所继承的这个信托所设立的，所以我说那是我的基金。
今天早上的播出的是”信托是为方智仁的孙女即方智仁的长子方文海所出的女儿方敏所设立的。“
----2017年12月12日发布
----January 1st, 2018
Chronicle Note
**I have not heard one single episode of this radio program myself for a lot of reasons. To do a radio program majorly featuring me was discussed on 07/01/2004 conference call. The radio program has been produced by United States 106.7FM or Clear Channel and on air since 2005??suppose??. I am a Chinese, the major featured person(suppose). Following are what I gathered from impacts of being the major featured person and may not correct. Please contact me at somebodyinMA@gmail.com if the content is seriously incorrect and please provide references including broadcasting channel and time, thanks forward.
01-15-2018 Should A Public Media's big Investor "Pay to be shited even name harm is the only intention?" 这届中国政府根本就是篡党夺权的政府
Should A Public Media's big Investor "Pay to be shited even name harm is the only intention?". (中文附后）
My response: I refuse to pay to let this “cousin” tell everyone she is the person actually "having attorneys" and capable of "resolving issues".
I did hear this “pay to be shited" was organized by Albert Gore. And I refuse to pay to be shited from those who shit out of hatred.
I never hired no-attorney-licensed Albert Gore to represent my any lawful interest or any lawful rights. I refuse Albert Gore's public robbery attempted that aimed at my own financial power over my own money.
It was well-known I publicly rejected Albert Gore to be supported by my financial power over my own inheritances on July 1st of 2004, I have called Law enforcement's help on the money including my handsome intellectual making that he has stolen from me as well as this organized public robbery of my own power over my own finance.
I am constantly threatened that if I refuse to pay to be shited like you have heard on the radio, then I should not be allowed to be a big investor to own a public media, so what is the difference between "abusively use public media to commit a crime of public name harm" and public media's fair reporting or probing into issues related to public interests that maybe not correct?
----January 15th, 2018
Heard this morning's broadcasting of Chinese government's announcement of the investigation.
My response: I was like "how? They are the beneficiary group of all these announcements to promote activities, what needs to be investigated when it comes to the rumors that they are not promoted by former Chinese administration, but promoted by a female they have shared sexual relationship with since youth time, and by that female's publicly announced their "deserved fast promotion" on the radio program with her another sexual partner's (Albert Gore) support, and promoted her announcement without former Chinese administration's authorization?"
How could I possibly expect the National Leader who committed a crime according to Chinese Criminal Laws by pushing my father out of a moving car and drove off while my father still on the ground could possibly organize any lawful investigation?
How could I possibly believe this National Leader, that obviously well-supported by current administration of the People's Republic of China's government, can do a fair investigation, when what I heard is he invited my father to push my father out of a moving car in order to support my younger brother's wife to kick out my father from his own home that he bought by his own saving and his long years' employment he had worked for the Chinese Purple Mountain Observatory he bought this apartment from? I heard it was the same day (or the third day) that my father got up from the ground, he was ousted from his own home.
My father was a Chinese citizen, at least at the moment he was pushed out of a moving car. How could possibly that can be a lawfully elected Chinese national leader that dare to publicly commit such a Chinese Criminal Laws' defined crime？
I believe all these because of my own experiences living in the United States. I only met this Chinese Premiere Li once in 1991 and moved to the United States in 1996. Entire Chinese government administration, former and current, are all aware I never contacted him other than a faxed letter in January of 2015, addressed to Chinese Consulate New York because of the radio program's featured stories of his romances ,that informed him I was looking for information of my inherited wealth which did not even include a single tiny request that implied the intention of asking his help.
He broadcasted his "romance stories" on the radio after he fathers a Taiwanese woman's children, and he insisted on change my wealth ownership to his lawfully registered wife. By intentionally using the confusion of who is his wife and who mothers his child(children), he insisted on to own my wealth and insisted on to abusing my hard earned fame as if I want to stuck-on him, and actually his desire of own my wealth is the real reason of all his "practicing of this kind performing arts".。
I think it is possible that Chinese Premier Li, Keqiang(Kejiang， 李克强) and his partner Chinese Chairman Xi, Jinping(习近平）and this administration of People's Republic of China's government is illegally formed because they completely ignore the fact that the people's Republic of China is not privately owned by their beloved shared female but by all People's Republic of China's citizens.
I think it is possible that Chinese Premier Li, Keqiang(Kejiang， 李克强) and his partner Chinese Chairman Xi, Jinping(习近平）and this administration of People's Republic of China's government is illegally formed because they are possibly not promoted by the former administration of the People's Republic of China's government who is a group of people believes in China is a Lawful Country and Chinese People are industrious and brave( 勤劳勇敢).
I think it is possible that Chinese Premier Li, Keqiang(Kejiang， 李克强) and his partner Chinese Chairman Xi, Jinping(习近平）and this administration of People's Republic of China's government is illegally formed because no lawfully formed government would violate own laws to create any situation for personal gains in finance or in power. Not to mention live on other people's money and demand to be provided for without money owner's willingness by abusively using a Nation's government's powers and human & capital resources.
----January 15th, 2018
Heard some concern what will happen to my father after I publicly speak up?
My response: It can only be better. China that I came from is the People's Republic of China, not a privately owned whorehouse China substitution.
Everyone who ever heard me talking knows I never criticize Chinese government's any internal or foreign policy before Dec. of 2014, and violent swore about the notorious Chinese Premier L, Keqiang(Kejiang，中国国家总理李克强）and his romantic relationship.
My silence about I only met this Chinese Premiere Li, Keqiang did not help ease the situation that my inherited wealth kept being demanded by his lawfully registered wife but severed it because the reason to own my wealth is"That is his wife's inherited money and/or lawfully earned money and I am his lawfully registered wife Chenghong(程虹), why can't I use that money".
And my swearing about this Chinese Premiere Li, Keqiang（Kejiang，中国国家总理李克强） did help to clarification who his wife is worldwide, but severe the demanding to own my wealth by Chinese government official participation of this public rob my money through radio program's "announce intended ownership on the radio program without any lawful authorization and insist on changing the ownership according to the radio announcements to to really own what announced in reality by promoting the radio program as practicing some performing arts" scheme in 2015.
This substituting scheme of changing "who is the lawful owner of the money ", by practicing performing arts, to "who is the real wife is the person who deserves the money and should own the money" is the reason I say the organizer of this practicing this kind of performing arts is the "usurp party and state power group (篡党夺权团伙)"
My personal eperiences how I need to regain my own financial power over my own money including how I need to regain my lawful power to spend my own money as I wish, and my personal experiences that part of my fights to regain my own financial power over my own money have been against this administration of the People's Reublic of China's government that led by the Chinese Premiere Li, Keqiang （Kejiang， 中国国家总理李克强）and Chinese Chairman Xi, Jinping(中国国家主席习近平） is the reason I would think this administration of the People's Repubic of China's government must be a "usurp party and state power group (篡党夺权团伙)". The difference is just it is a different kind of powers, and that is all.
----January 15th, 2018
一个公共媒体的大投资人就是”就算破坏名誉是唯一目的，也应该付钱被别人骂吗？”
我的回应：我拒绝付钱让这个“亲戚”公告天下说她自己才是“请的起律师的”，才是有能力“处理问题的”一个。
我是有听说这种“付钱被人骂”是阿尔伯特·高尔组织的。我拒绝让任何人出于仇恨对我谩骂，更不用说付钱让他们这么做。
我从未雇佣现在已没有律师执照的阿尔伯特·高尔来代表我的任何法律权利和利益。我拒绝阿尔伯特·高尔企图公然篡夺我对自己私人合法财产的合法支配权的任何努力。
2004年的时候很多人就已经听说了我当众拒绝了用我对我所继承财产的支配权来支持阿尔伯特·高尔。我已经就我自己的钱财包括我的智慧产权收入被阿尔伯特·高尔通过广播剧公然掠夺，以及公然篡夺我对我合法拥有财产的合法支配权的所有违法行为报警处理了。
我经常被人威胁说要是我不肯花钱被人骂，也就是花钱被骂到惨不忍睹的就像你们在广播剧里听到的一样，我就不可能做一个公共媒体的大股东，那我想问的就是：媒体就某一事件的报道或对影响公众利益事件原因的探寻，因为对事件理解有误所造成的报道偏差和公然破坏名誉为唯一目的所进行的造谣诽谤公然羞辱之间的的区别是什么？
----2018年1月15日。
听说了今天早上的广播提到了中国政府要进行调查的宣布。
我的回应：我的反应就是“他们查？怎么查法啊？他们自己可能就是因为整个事件而获得利益的团体。 按照海外传言，他们自己就不是由中国的前一届政府推荐选拔提升的，而是由和他们自己都有两性关系的同一个女人，及通过这同一个女人的有两性关系的外国人（阿尔伯特·高尔）通过广播剧在全世界公开宣布他们就是应该被快速提拔的人才，再通过有组织的推广这个广播剧的宣布就是有效宣布等等一系列的活动，在未经前一届中国政府的授权下就通过广播剧在现实生活里在事实上被提拔了。碰到这种传言，他们自己再在同一个广播剧上宣布由他们自己查？怎么查啊？
我怎么会认为一个拖着我的父亲上了他的小轿车，再把我父亲从已启动的车里给推出去，看我父亲摔倒在地, 没等我父亲能够站起来，就轻轻松松扬长而去的这么一个人，一个明显已经违反了中华人民共和国刑事法法律的犯罪分子，却还继续可以当中华人民共和国的国家领导人的这么一个人，会有可能组织一个符合中华人民共和国法律的事件真相调查？
我那有可能会相信这样一个国家领导人，一个还明显被这一届中国政府鼎力支持的这么一个人，做所有这一切就是为了协助我弟弟的妻子把我父亲给赶出我父亲自己出钱买的天文台的职工宿舍的家门的这么一个人，会有可能做任何公平的调查啊？我听说的是：我父亲就是在南京的北京东路上，就是在大白天，就是在天文台宿舍大院的前面被公然推出已经启动的汽车而当众摔倒在地的，就在我父亲好不容易从地上站起来回到家里的同一天（或者第三天），就收到他儿子的老婆递上的装着我父亲身份证件的小塑料袋并被告知永远别回来了。我2015年一月打电话回家时, 我被那女的告知的是我父亲已经走了。
我父亲当时，至少是在他被推出已经启动的汽车那一刻，是一个中华人民共和国的公民，那有可能一个经过合法选举产生的国家领导人会如此胆大，会有可能在公然违反了中华人民共和国的刑事法法律，犯下刑事罪行却还可以继续做一个中华人民共和国的国家领导人的?
我相信所有这些传言，就是因为我自己在美国生活的亲身经历。我只在1991年见过这个中国李姓总理一次，然后于1996年移居美国。整个中国政府，前一届的和这一届的，都很清楚我从未联系过他，就只是在2015年一月因为广播剧播出的一些故事，给中国纽约总领事馆发过一个电传，告知我正在寻找我所继承的究竟是些什么，那封信里连暗示要求他帮助的意思都没有。（我所继承的钱在美国，我人也在美国，2004年我能在完全不知情的情况下在美国继承财产，我哪里会需要远在中国的任何人帮我找钱啊？）
他是在已经做了一个台湾女人的孩子父亲之后，才在广播剧里播出他的所谓爱情故事，他就是坚持要把我的财产的所有权变成他法律上登记的妻子所有。通过故意混淆谁是他的妻子及谁是他孩子的母亲，他就是坚持要拥有我的财富还公然破坏我的名誉好像是我在死缠着他，其实他想要拥有我的财产才是所有这些中华人民共和国所组织的演出的目的。
我会认为中国总理李克强和中国国家主席习近平所组成的这一届政府有可能是非法组成的政府就是因为他们完全罔顾中国人民共和国是所有中国公民所拥有的，而不是他们共同的心爱女人自己私家拥有的。
我会认为中国总理李克强和中国国家主席习近平所组成的这一届政府有可能是非法组成的政府就是因为他们可能不是由中国的前一届政府推荐选举产生的，因为中国的前一届政府是相信中国是一个法制的国家的政府，是相信中国人民是勤劳勇敢自己挣钱花的政府。
我会认为中国总理李克强和中国国家主席习近平所组成的这一届政府有可能是非法组成的政府就是因为哪有任何一个合法的政府组要通过破坏法律来做一个局，哪里会需要通过做这个局，那个局来得到权力和钱财。更不用说就是一定要让别人掏钱养着，还用一个国家的政府权利及人力物力就是一定要让别人就算不愿意也得拿钱出来？
----2018年1月15日。
听说了一些担心如果我如此之言，那我父亲怎么办？
我的回应：只会好。我所来自的中国人民共和国从来不是什么已经被私家娼妓院替代了的一个中国。
每一个听到过我说话的都知道在2014年12月之前我从未就中国政府的任何对内对外政策发表任何评论，但2015年一月以后我就开始了痛骂中国国家总理李克强以及他的私人生活。
我对于我只见过这个中国总理一面的沉默没能让他的法律上登记结婚的妻子停止向我要钱而是加剧，因为要拥有我的财产的理由是”那是他妻子的钱，而我（程虹）才是他法律登记结婚并有实际上的两性关系的合法妻子，我（程虹）为什么就是不能拥有这些钱？"
而我对于这个中国总理李克强的谩骂虽然向全世界澄清了谁才是他的妻子，但是因为中国政府的正式于2015年参与这个”通过广播剧不经授权的宣布就必须在现实中实际拥有”这么一个伎俩而加剧了这份要挟恐吓要求拥有我所继承财产的压力。
这种通过进行所谓的表演，把”谁是钱财的合法主人“的说法替换成“谁才是某人的真正妻子才是够资格拥有这份钱财”的伎俩是我说组织这些演出的根本就是一群篡党夺权团伙的原因。
我自己的亲生经历，那一份需要经历一番苦战才能让我自己合法的钱归我自己合法花的过程，那一份需要经历一份艰难才能夺回我对我自己合法财产的合法控制权的过程，而我自己的这份亲生经历以及我捍卫自己合法权利的一份苦战有一部分是在与中国总理李克强及中国国家主席习近平所领导的中国政府在苦战，是造成我会认为这一届中国政府根本是篡党夺权团伙的原因。区别也就只是不同的权利而已。
----2018年一月15日。
01-14-2018 Why it is my business to point out what is not Os families' lawful wealth?
Heard this morning's broadcasting of why I need to point out that Fund is never O'Connors' money.
My response: Tina O'Connor, through the radio program and related promotional activities, promoting the idea that I am not allowed ("not deserved") to be provided for by the Fund even the money is verified as lawfully paid for my exclusive usage, and she took every penny my second year's providing (for 2016) that paid by the fund to cover my daily living expense, etc. All these had made me a public well-know "fake rich person but a real beggar" that actually live on government's welfare is the reasons for all these clarifications.
Most likely, my first year's providing (for 2015) has been taken by Albert Gore or his related. My third year's providing (for 2017), rumored, taken by a "Jessica Pejoves" (one of the four or five daughters of the Duane-Reade retired pharmacist father and the actress mother Anne Pejoves).
Currently, I heard my one-bedroom apartment is "paid for 50 years but not allow to re-allocate" because Albert Gore is not going to "donate another payment". I have not seen a penny of my other two years' paid-out providing.
(*My first year's providing was paid in 2014 by the Fund that I asked Albert Gore's uncle's and father's attorney firms to represent on July 1st of 2004. They are no longer representing that Fund since mid of 2015.
----published on January 13th, 2018)
(*I needed to have new attorneys on that day was because my misunderstanding on why I was neglected to constant crying when I was in Janus Associates, a computer consulting company in Connecticut. I did realize in 2016 that I directed my anger wrongfully to the female attorney in 2004 and I sincerely apologize to her here again, this time is also from my understanding that let me safe inherit my trusts is more important than help to stop my cries.
----published on January 6th, 2018)
I heard all these payments was promoted by these people as some rich persons' donation that nobody would donate ever again and nobody would care if I am the beneficiary person of these "donations", because I really have nothing to do with any of these "donors" romantically, and it is unlikely they will have anything to do with me at all in the future after this "radio program's clarification of who the fxxx this Chinese woman is". And the reason for these rich persons' willingness to make these donations was only because they have too much money and that is all.
This is another reason for all these clarifications that including clarification on this Jessica Pejoves who took my third year's providing is not the person owns that fund because her parents and herself were not born to have that fund nor inherited that fund. I inherited that fund by inheriting my trust that set up that Fund on June 30th, 2004.
I did call law enforcement's help on all these, and I did inform Massachusett's General Attorney's office about some of these rumors I heard of that related to the MA taxpayers' help I received and what I know about my inheriting and what was decided on my entrusting meeting that held on July 1st of 2004. I remembered one of the decisions was my providing would be appended to the regular donations in order not to let my providing eat into regular donations by mistake or by confusion.
----January 14th, 2018
I heard some confusion regarding what I said in the meeting about more investment instead of intellectual income.
My response: What I mean and what was understood was: I trade my intellectual income for some extra investment shares. The reason was invention fees has no comparison with possible returns from extra investment opportunities.
It means the company would not pay invention fees or patent fees if they gave me extra investment shares.
I was told at the meeting to accepted invention fees and I agreed that was a good idea because my inheritances' investment opportunities are my contributions to what my grandfathers had made but this invention fee is purely my own making. So, I did not trade my invention fees with more investment opportunities.
What happened was a lot of those companies either did not know which is my inheritance Fund or did not think I need some extra investment opportunities because too many people wanted those investment opportunities. So they did not trade investment opportunities with company's saving of some expenses on invention fees.
It is either the company not pay for invention fees but gave me extra investment shares, or the company pay for my share of invention fees and gave me my shares of investment opportunities. It was never that the company could just give out this money from company's expenses to whoever.
So, the result is I have intellectual Income hard earned.
----January 14th, 2018
01-13-2018 My Father is Safe now and about O's frustration
Heard this morning's broadcasting that my father is safe now.
My response: I am so happy to hear this. BIG THANKS. I can't wait to reunite with him.
* I heard I might be demanded by 1980s style's "thanks need to be paid not just said", "happy need to be expressed visibly not just felt invisible".
I would respond with, that is if I am demanded, "I am expressing my happy feeling in word "happy" visibly on this blog, and I am paying my attention of thanks properly."
----January 13th, 2018
Heard this morning's broadcasting that I can only invite my father when I no longer live on Massachusetts(MA) taxpayers.
My response: It was never my intention to live on anybody. And I have been provided with my own money all these time I have been helped. Currently, only my apartment has been covered by my first year's paid providing. My first year's providing was paid in 2014 by the Fund that I asked Albert Gore's uncle's and father's attorney firms to represent on July 1st of 2004. They are no longer representing that Fund since mid of 2015.
I did email Massachusetts' General Attorney's office to tip what I know about my inherited wealth and my possible Intellectual Incomes. Being an MA resident, my Intellectual Incomes are subjected to MA income tax and it is my responsibility to report.
我继承财产的故事其实很简单，就是因为我是家里2500年来第一个有着和爷爷们一样的家里的继承掌纹胎记的女孩子，我爷爷们用为我设立信托的方式给了我一些礼物以示庆贺总算有了我（女孩）加盟之意。这钱那钱是我的就是因为是由我爷爷们替我设立的信托投资的。现在很多的负面宣传可能是因为我的智慧产权收入有些已被中国外交部的一些人员领取有关。专利一批下来就是五十年，所以专利费是可以拿五十年的。
----January 13th, 2018
Heard this morning's broadcasting of a "two children".
My response: I made myself very clear already, no need to express myself further on what this means.
I never lived on this person's money and I am providing for my own biological children handsomely but invisibly. I can totally provide them handsomely and visibly as well.
----January 13th, 2018
Heard this morning's broadcasting was associated with some O's real frustration.
My response: I can imagine their frustration, each family's financial change is about $100,000 - $ 1Million a year a household. Of course, a lot Os are imaginably jumpy frustrated.
I was asked why it has to stop?
I answered, "Because there is no reason to continue."
I was asked why not in 1970s time when there was no reason to continue already?"
I answered: "Because of this expected frustrations. It was not just Os but all who were born into the similar storied families were expected to be impacted."
I was asked why some adjusted well and some not?
I answered: "That's is certainly imaginable. Some may have started to pay attention to invest since 1970s, some may not good at financial planning."
I was asked will it be possible till everyone adjusted?
I answered: "That is unlikely. I can imagine the frustration. From my own experiences of running my own roof in a place that I call foreign and have no relatives around which certainly means there is no easy solution to make the ends meet, I would think it is better to rationalize what financial anxieties might be and focus on what can be done about them."
I heard a lot of mothers' frustrations of "I want my kids to have this or that and now I might not be able to afford them".
I answered: "I would make this or that as part of the list of what needed to be done and prioritize them, then focus on how. I would think financial managers or professionals may have a lot of advice on this kind of how-s".
I heard "I am the person providing comforts but not sharing the frustration when I was told if the bonus is a fair evaluation, now..."
My response: "I would put this feeling into the list of what needed to be done and prioritize it, then focus on how to get this feeling back. I would think financial managers or professionals may have a lot of advice on this kind of how-s as well"
----January 13th, 2018
01-12-2018 老爸爸：我的电邮地址: somebodyinma@gmail.com
Heard this morning's broadcasting about my father.
Should A Public Media's big Investor "Pay to be shited even name harm is the only intention?". (中文附后）
My response: I refuse to pay to let this “cousin” tell everyone she is the person actually "having attorneys" and capable of "resolving issues".
I did hear this “pay to be shited" was organized by Albert Gore. And I refuse to pay to be shited from those who shit out of hatred.
I never hired no-attorney-licensed Albert Gore to represent my any lawful interest or any lawful rights. I refuse Albert Gore's public robbery attempted that aimed at my own financial power over my own money.
It was well-known I publicly rejected Albert Gore to be supported by my financial power over my own inheritances on July 1st of 2004, I have called Law enforcement's help on the money including my handsome intellectual making that he has stolen from me as well as this organized public robbery of my own power over my own finance.
I am constantly threatened that if I refuse to pay to be shited like you have heard on the radio, then I should not be allowed to be a big investor to own a public media, so what is the difference between "abusively use public media to commit a crime of public name harm" and public media's fair reporting or probing into issues related to public interests that maybe not correct?
----January 15th, 2018
Heard this morning's broadcasting of Chinese government's announcement of the investigation.
My response: I was like "how? They are the beneficiary group of all these announcements to promote activities, what needs to be investigated when it comes to the rumors that they are not promoted by former Chinese administration, but promoted by a female they have shared sexual relationship with since youth time, and by that female's publicly announced their "deserved fast promotion" on the radio program with her another sexual partner's (Albert Gore) support, and promoted her announcement without former Chinese administration's authorization?"
How could I possibly expect the National Leader who committed a crime according to Chinese Criminal Laws by pushing my father out of a moving car and drove off while my father still on the ground could possibly organize any lawful investigation?
How could I possibly believe this National Leader, that obviously well-supported by current administration of the People's Republic of China's government, can do a fair investigation, when what I heard is he invited my father to push my father out of a moving car in order to support my younger brother's wife to kick out my father from his own home that he bought by his own saving and his long years' employment he had worked for the Chinese Purple Mountain Observatory he bought this apartment from? I heard it was the same day (or the third day) that my father got up from the ground, he was ousted from his own home.
My father was a Chinese citizen, at least at the moment he was pushed out of a moving car. How could possibly that can be a lawfully elected Chinese national leader that dare to publicly commit such a Chinese Criminal Laws' defined crime？
I believe all these because of my own experiences living in the United States. I only met this Chinese Premiere Li once in 1991 and moved to the United States in 1996. Entire Chinese government administration, former and current, are all aware I never contacted him other than a faxed letter in January of 2015, addressed to Chinese Consulate New York because of the radio program's featured stories of his romances ,that informed him I was looking for information of my inherited wealth which did not even include a single tiny request that implied the intention of asking his help.
He broadcasted his "romance stories" on the radio after he fathers a Taiwanese woman's children, and he insisted on change my wealth ownership to his lawfully registered wife. By intentionally using the confusion of who is his wife and who mothers his child(children), he insisted on to own my wealth and insisted on to abusing my hard earned fame as if I want to stuck-on him, and actually his desire of own my wealth is the real reason of all his "practicing of this kind performing arts".。
I think it is possible that Chinese Premier Li, Keqiang(Kejiang， 李克强) and his partner Chinese Chairman Xi, Jinping(习近平）and this administration of People's Republic of China's government is illegally formed because they completely ignore the fact that the people's Republic of China is not privately owned by their beloved shared female but by all People's Republic of China's citizens.
I think it is possible that Chinese Premier Li, Keqiang(Kejiang， 李克强) and his partner Chinese Chairman Xi, Jinping(习近平）and this administration of People's Republic of China's government is illegally formed because they are possibly not promoted by the former administration of the People's Republic of China's government who is a group of people believes in China is a Lawful Country and Chinese People are industrious and brave( 勤劳勇敢).
I think it is possible that Chinese Premier Li, Keqiang(Kejiang， 李克强) and his partner Chinese Chairman Xi, Jinping(习近平）and this administration of People's Republic of China's government is illegally formed because no lawfully formed government would violate own laws to create any situation for personal gains in finance or in power. Not to mention live on other people's money and demand to be provided for without money owner's willingness by abusively using a Nation's government's powers and human & capital resources.
----January 15th, 2018
Heard some concern what will happen to my father after I publicly speak up?
My response: It can only be better. China that I came from is the People's Republic of China, not a privately owned whorehouse China substitution.
Everyone who ever heard me talking knows I never criticize Chinese government's any internal or foreign policy before Dec. of 2014, and violent swore about the notorious Chinese Premier L, Keqiang(Kejiang，中国国家总理李克强）and his romantic relationship.
My silence about I only met this Chinese Premiere Li, Keqiang did not help ease the situation that my inherited wealth kept being demanded by his lawfully registered wife but severed it because the reason to own my wealth is"That is his wife's inherited money and/or lawfully earned money and I am his lawfully registered wife Chenghong(程虹), why can't I use that money".
And my swearing about this Chinese Premiere Li, Keqiang（Kejiang，中国国家总理李克强） did help to clarification who his wife is worldwide, but severe the demanding to own my wealth by Chinese government official participation of this public rob my money through radio program's "announce intended ownership on the radio program without any lawful authorization and insist on changing the ownership according to the radio announcements to to really own what announced in reality by promoting the radio program as practicing some performing arts" scheme in 2015.
This substituting scheme of changing "who is the lawful owner of the money ", by practicing performing arts, to "who is the real wife is the person who deserves the money and should own the money" is the reason I say the organizer of this practicing this kind of performing arts is the "usurp party and state power group (篡党夺权团伙)"
My personal eperiences how I need to regain my own financial power over my own money including how I need to regain my lawful power to spend my own money as I wish, and my personal experiences that part of my fights to regain my own financial power over my own money have been against this administration of the People's Reublic of China's government that led by the Chinese Premiere Li, Keqiang （Kejiang， 中国国家总理李克强）and Chinese Chairman Xi, Jinping(中国国家主席习近平） is the reason I would think this administration of the People's Repubic of China's government must be a "usurp party and state power group (篡党夺权团伙)". The difference is just it is a different kind of powers, and that is all.
----January 15th, 2018
一个公共媒体的大投资人就是”就算破坏名誉是唯一目的，也应该付钱被别人骂吗？”
我的回应：我拒绝付钱让这个“亲戚”公告天下说她自己才是“请的起律师的”，才是有能力“处理问题的”一个。
我是有听说这种“付钱被人骂”是阿尔伯特·高尔组织的。我拒绝让任何人出于仇恨对我谩骂，更不用说付钱让他们这么做。
我从未雇佣现在已没有律师执照的阿尔伯特·高尔来代表我的任何法律权利和利益。我拒绝阿尔伯特·高尔企图公然篡夺我对自己私人合法财产的合法支配权的任何努力。
我经常被人威胁说要是我不肯花钱被人骂，也就是花钱被骂到惨不忍睹的就像你们在广播剧里听到的一样，我就不可能做一个公共媒体的大股东，那我想问的就是：媒体就某一事件的报道或对影响公众利益事件原因的探寻，因为对事件理解有误所造成的报道偏差和公然破坏名誉为唯一目的所进行的造谣诽谤公然羞辱之间的的区别是什么？
----2018年1月15日。
听说了今天早上的广播提到了中国政府要进行调查的宣布。
我的回应：我的反应就是“他们查？怎么查法啊？他们自己可能就是因为整个事件而获得利益的团体。 按照海外传言，他们自己就不是由中国的前一届政府推荐选拔提升的，而是由和他们自己都有两性关系的同一个女人，及通过这同一个女人的有两性关系的外国人（阿尔伯特·高尔）通过广播剧在全世界公开宣布他们就是应该被快速提拔的人才，再通过有组织的推广这个广播剧的宣布就是有效宣布等等一系列的活动，在未经前一届中国政府的授权下就通过广播剧在现实生活里在事实上被提拔了。碰到这种传言，他们自己再在同一个广播剧上宣布由他们自己查？怎么查啊？
我怎么会认为一个拖着我的父亲上了他的小轿车，再把我父亲从已启动的车里给推出去，看我父亲摔倒在地, 没等我父亲能够站起来，就轻轻松松扬长而去的这么一个人，一个明显已经违反了中华人民共和国刑事法法律的犯罪分子，却还继续可以当中华人民共和国的国家领导人的这么一个人，会有可能组织一个符合中华人民共和国法律的事件真相调查？
我那有可能会相信这样一个国家领导人，一个还明显被这一届中国政府鼎力支持的这么一个人，做所有这一切就是为了协助我弟弟的妻子把我父亲给赶出我父亲自己出钱买的天文台的职工宿舍的家门的这么一个人，会有可能做任何公平的调查啊？我听说的是：我父亲就是在南京的北京东路上，就是在大白天，就是在天文台宿舍大院的前面被公然推出已经启动的汽车而当众摔倒在地的，就在我父亲好不容易从地上站起来回到家里的同一天（或者第三天），就收到他儿子的老婆递上的装着我父亲身份证件的小塑料袋并被告知永远别回来了。我2015年一月打电话回家时, 我被那女的告知的是我父亲已经走了。
我父亲当时，至少是在他被推出已经启动的汽车那一刻，是一个中华人民共和国的公民，那有可能一个经过合法选举产生的国家领导人会如此胆大，会有可能在公然违反了中华人民共和国的刑事法法律，犯下刑事罪行却还可以继续做一个中华人民共和国的国家领导人的?
我相信所有这些传言，就是因为我自己在美国生活的亲身经历。我只在1991年见过这个中国李姓总理一次，然后于1996年移居美国。整个中国政府，前一届的和这一届的，都很清楚我从未联系过他，就只是在2015年一月因为广播剧播出的一些故事，给中国纽约总领事馆发过一个电传，告知我正在寻找我所继承的究竟是些什么，那封信里连暗示要求他帮助的意思都没有。（我所继承的钱在美国，我人也在美国，2004年我能在完全不知情的情况下在美国继承财产，我哪里会需要远在中国的任何人帮我找钱啊？）
他是在已经做了一个台湾女人的孩子父亲之后，才在广播剧里播出他的所谓爱情故事，他就是坚持要把我的财产的所有权变成他法律上登记的妻子所有。通过故意混淆谁是他的妻子及谁是他孩子的母亲，他就是坚持要拥有我的财富还公然破坏我的名誉好像是我在死缠着他，其实他想要拥有我的财产才是所有这些中华人民共和国所组织的演出的目的。
我会认为中国总理李克强和中国国家主席习近平所组成的这一届政府有可能是非法组成的政府就是因为他们完全罔顾中国人民共和国是所有中国公民所拥有的，而不是他们共同的心爱女人自己私家拥有的。
我会认为中国总理李克强和中国国家主席习近平所组成的这一届政府有可能是非法组成的政府就是因为他们可能不是由中国的前一届政府推荐选举产生的，因为中国的前一届政府是相信中国是一个法制的国家的政府，是相信中国人民是勤劳勇敢自己挣钱花的政府。
我会认为中国总理李克强和中国国家主席习近平所组成的这一届政府有可能是非法组成的政府就是因为哪有任何一个合法的政府组要通过破坏法律来做一个局，哪里会需要通过做这个局，那个局来得到权力和钱财。更不用说就是一定要让别人掏钱养着，还用一个国家的政府权利及人力物力就是一定要让别人就算不愿意也得拿钱出来？
----2018年1月15日。
听说了一些担心如果我如此之言，那我父亲怎么办？
我的回应：只会好。我所来自的中国人民共和国从来不是什么已经被私家娼妓院替代了的一个中国。
每一个听到过我说话的都知道在2014年12月之前我从未就中国政府的任何对内对外政策发表任何评论，但2015年一月以后我就开始了痛骂中国国家总理李克强以及他的私人生活。
我对于我只见过这个中国总理一面的沉默没能让他的法律上登记结婚的妻子停止向我要钱而是加剧，因为要拥有我的财产的理由是”那是他妻子的钱，而我（程虹）才是他法律登记结婚并有实际上的两性关系的合法妻子，我（程虹）为什么就是不能拥有这些钱？"
而我对于这个中国总理李克强的谩骂虽然向全世界澄清了谁才是他的妻子，但是因为中国政府的正式于2015年参与这个”通过广播剧不经授权的宣布就必须在现实中实际拥有”这么一个伎俩而加剧了这份要挟恐吓要求拥有我所继承财产的压力。
这种通过进行所谓的表演，把”谁是钱财的合法主人“的说法替换成“谁才是某人的真正妻子才是够资格拥有这份钱财”的伎俩是我说组织这些演出的根本就是一群篡党夺权团伙的原因。
我自己的亲生经历，那一份需要经历一番苦战才能让我自己合法的钱归我自己合法花的过程，那一份需要经历一份艰难才能夺回我对我自己合法财产的合法控制权的过程，而我自己的这份亲生经历以及我捍卫自己合法权利的一份苦战有一部分是在与中国总理李克强及中国国家主席习近平所领导的中国政府在苦战，是造成我会认为这一届中国政府根本是篡党夺权团伙的原因。区别也就只是不同的权利而已。
----2018年一月15日。
01-14-2018 Why it is my business to point out what is not Os families' lawful wealth?
Heard this morning's broadcasting of why I need to point out that Fund is never O'Connors' money.
My response: Tina O'Connor, through the radio program and related promotional activities, promoting the idea that I am not allowed ("not deserved") to be provided for by the Fund even the money is verified as lawfully paid for my exclusive usage, and she took every penny my second year's providing (for 2016) that paid by the fund to cover my daily living expense, etc. All these had made me a public well-know "fake rich person but a real beggar" that actually live on government's welfare is the reasons for all these clarifications.
Most likely, my first year's providing (for 2015) has been taken by Albert Gore or his related. My third year's providing (for 2017), rumored, taken by a "Jessica Pejoves" (one of the four or five daughters of the Duane-Reade retired pharmacist father and the actress mother Anne Pejoves).
Currently, I heard my one-bedroom apartment is "paid for 50 years but not allow to re-allocate" because Albert Gore is not going to "donate another payment". I have not seen a penny of my other two years' paid-out providing.
(*My first year's providing was paid in 2014 by the Fund that I asked Albert Gore's uncle's and father's attorney firms to represent on July 1st of 2004. They are no longer representing that Fund since mid of 2015.
----published on January 13th, 2018)
(*I needed to have new attorneys on that day was because my misunderstanding on why I was neglected to constant crying when I was in Janus Associates, a computer consulting company in Connecticut. I did realize in 2016 that I directed my anger wrongfully to the female attorney in 2004 and I sincerely apologize to her here again, this time is also from my understanding that let me safe inherit my trusts is more important than help to stop my cries.
----published on January 6th, 2018)
I heard all these payments was promoted by these people as some rich persons' donation that nobody would donate ever again and nobody would care if I am the beneficiary person of these "donations", because I really have nothing to do with any of these "donors" romantically, and it is unlikely they will have anything to do with me at all in the future after this "radio program's clarification of who the fxxx this Chinese woman is". And the reason for these rich persons' willingness to make these donations was only because they have too much money and that is all.
This is another reason for all these clarifications that including clarification on this Jessica Pejoves who took my third year's providing is not the person owns that fund because her parents and herself were not born to have that fund nor inherited that fund. I inherited that fund by inheriting my trust that set up that Fund on June 30th, 2004.
I did call law enforcement's help on all these, and I did inform Massachusett's General Attorney's office about some of these rumors I heard of that related to the MA taxpayers' help I received and what I know about my inheriting and what was decided on my entrusting meeting that held on July 1st of 2004. I remembered one of the decisions was my providing would be appended to the regular donations in order not to let my providing eat into regular donations by mistake or by confusion.
----January 14th, 2018
I heard some confusion regarding what I said in the meeting about more investment instead of intellectual income.
My response: What I mean and what was understood was: I trade my intellectual income for some extra investment shares. The reason was invention fees has no comparison with possible returns from extra investment opportunities.
It means the company would not pay invention fees or patent fees if they gave me extra investment shares.
I was told at the meeting to accepted invention fees and I agreed that was a good idea because my inheritances' investment opportunities are my contributions to what my grandfathers had made but this invention fee is purely my own making. So, I did not trade my invention fees with more investment opportunities.
What happened was a lot of those companies either did not know which is my inheritance Fund or did not think I need some extra investment opportunities because too many people wanted those investment opportunities. So they did not trade investment opportunities with company's saving of some expenses on invention fees.
It is either the company not pay for invention fees but gave me extra investment shares, or the company pay for my share of invention fees and gave me my shares of investment opportunities. It was never that the company could just give out this money from company's expenses to whoever.
So, the result is I have intellectual Income hard earned.
----January 14th, 2018
01-13-2018 My Father is Safe now and about O's frustration
Heard this morning's broadcasting that my father is safe now.
My response: I am so happy to hear this. BIG THANKS. I can't wait to reunite with him.
* I heard I might be demanded by 1980s style's "thanks need to be paid not just said", "happy need to be expressed visibly not just felt invisible".
I would respond with, that is if I am demanded, "I am expressing my happy feeling in word "happy" visibly on this blog, and I am paying my attention of thanks properly."
----January 13th, 2018
Heard this morning's broadcasting that I can only invite my father when I no longer live on Massachusetts(MA) taxpayers.
My response: It was never my intention to live on anybody. And I have been provided with my own money all these time I have been helped. Currently, only my apartment has been covered by my first year's paid providing. My first year's providing was paid in 2014 by the Fund that I asked Albert Gore's uncle's and father's attorney firms to represent on July 1st of 2004. They are no longer representing that Fund since mid of 2015.
I did email Massachusetts' General Attorney's office to tip what I know about my inherited wealth and my possible Intellectual Incomes. Being an MA resident, my Intellectual Incomes are subjected to MA income tax and it is my responsibility to report.
我继承财产的故事其实很简单，就是因为我是家里2500年来第一个有着和爷爷们一样的家里的继承掌纹胎记的女孩子，我爷爷们用为我设立信托的方式给了我一些礼物以示庆贺总算有了我（女孩）加盟之意。这钱那钱是我的就是因为是由我爷爷们替我设立的信托投资的。现在很多的负面宣传可能是因为我的智慧产权收入有些已被中国外交部的一些人员领取有关。专利一批下来就是五十年，所以专利费是可以拿五十年的。
----January 13th, 2018
Heard this morning's broadcasting of a "two children".
My response: I made myself very clear already, no need to express myself further on what this means.
I never lived on this person's money and I am providing for my own biological children handsomely but invisibly. I can totally provide them handsomely and visibly as well.
----January 13th, 2018
Heard this morning's broadcasting was associated with some O's real frustration.
My response: I can imagine their frustration, each family's financial change is about $100,000 - $ 1Million a year a household. Of course, a lot Os are imaginably jumpy frustrated.
I was asked why it has to stop?
I answered, "Because there is no reason to continue."
I was asked why not in 1970s time when there was no reason to continue already?"
I answered: "Because of this expected frustrations. It was not just Os but all who were born into the similar storied families were expected to be impacted."
I was asked why some adjusted well and some not?
I answered: "That's is certainly imaginable. Some may have started to pay attention to invest since 1970s, some may not good at financial planning."
I was asked will it be possible till everyone adjusted?
I answered: "That is unlikely. I can imagine the frustration. From my own experiences of running my own roof in a place that I call foreign and have no relatives around which certainly means there is no easy solution to make the ends meet, I would think it is better to rationalize what financial anxieties might be and focus on what can be done about them."
I heard a lot of mothers' frustrations of "I want my kids to have this or that and now I might not be able to afford them".
I answered: "I would make this or that as part of the list of what needed to be done and prioritize them, then focus on how. I would think financial managers or professionals may have a lot of advice on this kind of how-s".
I heard "I am the person providing comforts but not sharing the frustration when I was told if the bonus is a fair evaluation, now..."
My response: "I would put this feeling into the list of what needed to be done and prioritize it, then focus on how to get this feeling back. I would think financial managers or professionals may have a lot of advice on this kind of how-s as well"
----January 13th, 2018
01-12-2018 老爸爸：我的电邮地址: somebodyinma@gmail.com
Heard this morning's broadcasting about my father.
My response: I saw yesterday on Chinese Consulate webpage that my father has been searching for me since 2013. I contacted the number listed on that webpage yesterday and left my contact information.
I heard my father is found from satellite image records. I hope I can hear from him and reunite with him soon.
If anyone who reads this blog knows my father's whereabouts, please pass along my contact email: somebodyinma@gmail.com
----January 12th, 2018
I heard my father is found from satellite image records. I hope I can hear from him and reunite with him soon.
If anyone who reads this blog knows my father's whereabouts, please pass along my contact email: somebodyinma@gmail.com
----January 12th, 2018
以下是我昨天博文的中文翻译及我写给我弟弟的电邮：
我告诉你我都听到了什么传言：
我听说的是广播剧有提到我父亲是活着自己走出医院的，我还听说在那之后，我1991年曾见过一面，曾用名李政纲的现中国总理李克强把我父亲给请上了他自己的小轿车，等车开动却把门打开把我父亲推出车外，当时是在街上，有过往行人看见我父亲摔倒在地。我父亲当时已经80多岁了。*听说已经从卫星录像资料证实。
| 回复 |
| 回复 |
| 回复 |
----January 12th, 2018
01-11-2018 (2) My Father is looking for me since August of 2015 （我爸爸的寻人启事）
01-11-2018 Origin of my Private Wealth and My College Education
Heard this morning's broadcasting about my college education.
My response: I speak up here what I heard early last year when I was trying to apply my current MBA with an undergraduate and graduate school records. I sent out 2 emails, multiple addresses each time, but I did not get any response.
It was already rumored around if I had any college education since 2016's radio program announcement from P.R. China's government that Shanghai Medical University was no longer existed (because of name change) but broadcasted with editing technique to produce the public impression of a fake college.
What I heard was Chinese Premiere Li went to Fudan University Shanghai medical college with a group of people one day that is sometime after 2012, and practiced some performing arts of "shred alumni's school records and burn them all". I used records because I heard there were four alumni's school records were destroyed permanently in this way that day. I did not hear how often this way of practicing performing arts had been performed nationwide in the People's Republic of China.
Fudan University Shanghai Medical College is currently addressed at 138 Yixueyuan Rd, Xuhui Qu, Shanghai, P.R. China, it is the same address of the Shanghai First Medical College I was enrolled in 1985 and it is same address of the Shanghai Medical University I graduated from in 1990.
Luckily, like I said this morning, I do not need their lies about my education. Tons of countries can use their own satellite image records to verify my saying of "went to Shanghai Medical University since 1985, went to classrooms and/or test lab daily, and lived daily in an 8-persons a room's student dorm till graduation in 1990."
I also heard similar stories of this kind performing art practicing in the United States. The performing objects were accounting books and related records, the practicing of performing was to shred and burn it all after taken those records out of a safe box. I did tip law enforcement when I heard other related rumors.
I heard tons of rumors this kind. I am apparently completely cured of the anxiety disorder. I am apparently very well protected by the Laws.
----January 11th, 2018
Other rumors I heard about what else this Chinese Premiere Li did in China.
My response: There are tons of rumors about my father.
I speak up here what I have heard:
I heard it was broadcasted on the radio program that my father had walked out of a hospital and went missing, what else I heard was, sometime after that, Chinese Premier Li invited my father to get on to his chauffeur equipped car, but once the car started moving, my father was pushed out when the car door opened. It was in public place with bypassers watching my father fall to the ground. *I heard this was verified from satellite images already.
My father was in his 80s already when this happened (born in 1932).
That is not the only rumor I heard how my father had been abused. I did ask laws help on my father after I heard fake news from my younger brother in 2015. My whereabouts have been well-known in Chinese community since 2004, I should be able to hear any news about my father if the news is important. Chinese Community is not all evils.
----January 11th, 2018
Heard this morning's talk about the origin of my private wealth.
My response: I published this on somebodyinBoston.blogspot.com in 2016.
My family wealth originated from Emperor Private Wealth which was generated by 3% tax collecting. The tax collecting is similar to modern tax laws 1% tax incentive to reward patron's great contribution to regional economic growth. There is no special collecting for this modern 1% incentive tax but reward by the government from already collected tax, the same no special collecting for Emperor 3% tax but 3% of all collected tax transferred into Emperor's private wealth. As modern tax laws to condition tax incentive by evaluating contributions to regional economic growth, being an Emperor to earn this 3% tax as income is not easy at all either. Being the head of an Empire, an Emperor needs to perform the tasks as to keep the Empire in peace, to stimulate economic growth and culture prosperous, to make subjects in Empire happy being Emperor's subjects, to make neighbor countries have no complaint but admire of Empire prosperous., etc. It is never an easy job for a CEO of any company to ensure company keeps growing in fierce competition, it was not easy to achieve these things on a large scale like a big country as China. "Golden Years" and “Keiyuan Spirit" are the performance evaluation given to my ancestor grandfathers by Chinese history. My family wealth origins are, like nowadays government employees paychecks and benefits, well deserved hard earned private wealth. *Note: 3% is an example tax rate. Emperor tax rate was not a fixed value rate but vary by Dynasty and/or by Emperor.
(----published in early 2016)
I repeat what I said this morning in Chinese, all these historic taxes rates and Emperor's share in collected taxes were all recorded in Chinese historical books. I do not need to explain.
It is well-known to all countries that have a government, Royals' private wealth is separated from the Kingdom's Central Bank's Reserve. A state-run company's savings is separated from its CEO's own money. I don't need to explain either.
----January 11th, 2018
关于我私人财富的起源。
我家的财产最早是起源于占税收3%的皇家税。这皇家税的征收办法是和现代税收里的1%增进地区经济发展税是一样的，不另外特别征收，而是从已征收的税收中拨转已征税收总额的3%至皇家私库，属于皇家私有财产。就像现代税收里这1%的奖励税是需要通过特别审批才有资格获得一样，皇家要挣到这3%的皇家税也不容易。作为一国之君，一个皇帝需要做到的事包括：保障帝国的疆域安全，促进帝国的经济发展文化繁荣，让帝国子民快乐幸福而实现国泰民安，让邻国艳羡推崇帝国的繁荣昌盛但不嫉妒怀恨抱怨，等等。就像一个企业的总经理要想在一个竞争激烈的环境里领导企业发展从来就不是一个很容易的事一样，要想在更大的作为一个国家的中国的范畴内有如此成就更是一点都不容易。中国历史上的“贞观之治” 和“开元盛世”就是中国历史对我爷爷们治国表现的推崇。我的私有财富的起源，也就是源自于现代社会所说的政府公务员的工资和福利，都是来自国家征收的税收收入却是100%辛勤工作挣到的合法私人财产。*注：3%的税率是一个假设的数字做解释使用。皇家税率不是固定的，因朝代和皇帝而异。
（----摘自2016年所发表的）
我重复我早上所说的，所有这些历史上的征税税率及皇家税的税率都是历史书上有记载的，不需要我过多解释。
现代很多有政府的国家也都知道，皇室财产不包括帝国中央银行的财富储备。国家所拥有的一家公司的总经理的私人存款账户不包括公司的存款账户。我也不需要过多解释。
----2018年1月11日。
01-10-2018 About this morning's "a mother since 18 years old" and the joke of "Are you sure she has any money"?
Heard this morning's broadcasting of a woman who mothers a rich person's child since 18.
My response: As long as he fathers another woman's child or children, he is a none of my business people. I don't care who that woman might be, young or old, ugly or pretty.
I was never provided by this rich person. I have lived on my own wealth that I inherited from my own birth grandfathers. I don't care how well he can provide for whoever. I am provided well by my own birth grandfathers' blessing.
----January 10th, 2018
Heard this morning's joke about a Mr. Jimmy Geithner.
My response: The joke is because this Jimmy featured in this morning's broadcasting was on July 1st of 2004's meeting as well.
I am the person not sure who is the one I called "my finance guy" which means "my accountant". I was correctly understood by everybody who heard me introducing "I have an accountant" proudly on June 30th and July 1st of 2004. The original wording is "That is my finance guy". I introduced this "my accountant" to a group of Taiwanese after Smartphone related chats on June 30th of 2004.
I heard the person who signed out my providing checks since 2004 that including my $400 Million medical treatments spending and my current housing that I am residing in is the person I assumed my accountant. I am much relaxed now even though I have not received my food & cash providing yet from the same check that covers my current housing.
I did hear this morning's "joke" with the question "Are you sure she has any money?" has happened often and frequently since 2004 to the person I introduced as my accountant. He has been insulted all this time, and I had been agitated to be called a stuck-on beggar all this time.
----January 10th, 2018
The difference between Royals, me and Don Quijote de la Mancha.
My response: Well, I have some ancient titles and wealth entrusted since ancient times but both inherited, not some craziness out of my fancy ideas to practice some ancient-hood.
I did joke about hiring some security guys in my own self-designed uniforms to perform some marching on my own private property, and have all my kids watching this "phenomena" on a balcony with titles I lawfully entitled them.
But there are huge differences between me and Royals, or me and Don Quijote de la Mancha.
Royals are residing in a country with respectful subjects, Royal laws, and Nationally acknowledged Royal Privileges, etc.
I live a modern life in my own properties on the soil of a country I am a same equal citizen of. But I do have some inherited, and ancient, and valid, and lawfully respected titles I can entitle my own children.
Don Quijote de la Mancha lived in his own invented fantasy of practicing knighthood in his adventures.
----January 10th, 2018
01-09-2018 All About my Imperial Ancestry and My Royal Titles
Heard this morning's broadcasting if I am the heir of Tang dynasty Emperor Taizong of Tang or just an Imperial offspring.
My response: I am the heir of Chinese Emperor Taizong of Tang.
----January 9th, 2018
Heard the confusion expressed this morning is the Chinese tradition of Firstborn Son Inheriting Custom.
My response: First Born Son inheriting is not the custom of Chinese Emperors' family.
West Han dynasty (西汉, 206BC - 8AD）, East Han dynasty（东汉, 25AD-220AD）, Tang dynasty（唐朝, 618AD - 907AD）, Yuan dynasty（元朝, originated from Genghis Khan， 1279AD-1368AD) and Qing dynasty（清朝, 1644AD-1911AD） were having own inheriting rules that were not according to the firstborn son inheriting custom, especially Tang dynasty, Yuan dynasty and Qing dynasty are well known not firstborn inheriting. I do not know if Yuan dynasty or Qing dynasty had female heir disguised in male's appearance to inherit. I am the female heir of Tang dynasty Emperors and I had a grandmother crowned herself a Wuzhou Empress with the support from her Tang dynasty Emperor husband's heir son (my grandfather). Her Emperor husband was Emperor Gaozong of Tang（唐高宗李治）
http://www.yutopian.com/history/
西漢 (West Han dynasty)
(1) 漢高祖 劉邦 (前206-前195) (my grandfather)
(2) 漢惠帝 劉盈 (前194-前188)
(3) 漢高后 呂雉(漢少帝 劉恭，漢少帝 劉弘) (前187-前180) (a wife)
(4) 漢文帝 劉恆 (前179-前157)（竇皇后）(a wife)
(5) 漢景帝 劉啟 (前156-前141)
(6) 漢武帝 劉徹 (前140-前87) (possibly my grandfather, 东汉的开国皇帝是光武帝)
(7) 漢昭帝 劉弗陵 (前86-前74)
(8) 漢宣帝 劉詢 (前73-前49)
(9) 漢元帝 劉爽 (前32-前7)
(10) 漢成帝 劉驁 (前32-前7)
(11) 漢哀帝 劉欣 (前6-前1)
(12) 漢平帝 劉衍 (1-5)
(13) 孺子 劉嬰 (6-8)
http://www.kmuh.org.tw/www/drgga/www/C.H/CH02.htm)
----January 9th, 2018
Heard this morning's talk about Beauty Da （Daji?).
My response: Now everybody already familiar with PRC80 style talk.
What this morning broadcasted was: It was not because of her blood or there is an ancient painting to prove that she resembles the Beauty Da ( Daji?, 1766 to 1122 BC).(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shang_dynasty)
She is a "real beauty Da(Daji)" is because her lovers appreciated her with the words copied from a Chinese historic book that described the Beauty Da(Daji)".
----January 9th, 2018
Heard this morning's broadcasting of a grandmother's wish.
My response: This morning's broadcasting is not from the British Crown Prince William.
I don't care what that male's grandmother's wish is. I refuse to consider any romance possibility with that male.
I did not hear British Crown Prince William had made such saying. And the rumors about possible children between me and the British Crown Prince, which has been clarified untrue already, was because I am the owner of the British East India Company Financier.
I reject any idea to match me with a male who is an old man to another woman's child or children already.
I was born with Royal titles with handsome wealth that set up together with my trusts. I do not need to consider matrimony to advance myself financially or socially, and I already worked very hard and already advanced myself academically very good.
I refuse to consider any romance with anyone that can be described as Old even that is a male of 20 years of age but a biological father of another woman's child already.
I do have a huge problem with the Radio company's management called-in all these people to produce such dry-cries of themselves to broadcast on a public channel's radio program.
----January 9th, 2018
How can a Royal title be set up with a Trust?
My response: Well, as part of the gift, as long as that is from an Emperor or a ruling Empress.
I am the first girl in 2500 years who shares my Emperors grandfathers birthmark.This family birthmark became my family's heir birthmark since East Han (25AD). This is the reason I received some trusts as gifts from my grandfathers.
It is publicly well known that a King or a Queen can entitle a subject, but the highest title in a hierarchy system that is equivalent to King or Queen can only be titled to themselves, or gift to the Crown Prince or Crown Princess with the condition set as valid upon inheriting.
I don't know if my ancient Emperor grandfathers had entitled themselves that can be inherited which I can refer to as family titles to differentiate with those associated with the Crown or the Emperium, and I don't know if my father had given-up his inheritable family titles at the same time he gave up his financial inheritable that made my grandfather had no choice but gifted all to me, I did inherit Emperor or Empress equivalent titles (such as Ingonyama) on June 30th of 2004 with the wealth that set up together in those trusts I inherited on June 30th of 2004.
----January 9th, 2018
01-08-2018 Loud and Clear is the "Voice of the Law People" and "a Mother's Obligation"
Heard this morning's broadcasting of "the voice of the law people"
My response: I am thrilled to hear "the voice of the law people" is now loud and clear on the radio program.
----January 8th, 2018
Heard this morning's talk about my biological children is a pair of my true statements.
My response: It is my obligation to tell the entire world they are my beloved.
----January 8th, 2018
Heard yesterday's talk of a Chinese Mr. Li.
My response: I heard this Mr.Li is a 3rd cousin to me by DNA test result which means his great-grandfather was my great-grandfather's half-brother. Mr. Li is very proud that his great-grandfather was one of the earliest group of students that studied in France and became earliest members of Chinese Communist Party.
I did not hear his great-grandfather had any inheriting abroad related rumors. My inheriting or my inherited wealth has nothing to do with this Mr. Li or his great-grandfather.
I heard his great-grandfather's hostility against my grandfather was a major reason that my grandfather was not popular among those earliest members of Chinese Communist Party. My grandfather decided to entrust wealth abroad was from the concern of widespread rumors that after 1949's liberation, " Chinese government would buy private wealth at the price that would be equivalent as private wealth had filed bankruptcy".
----January 8th, 2017
Heard this morning's talk about Rockefeller and O'Connor name.
My response: I heard it is from some American Rockefellers and some American O'Connors, together with an American Jessica Petroves and an American David Petroves that forbid the public to be aware that I have my own biological children.
It is my obligation to tell all these people that these two children do have a mother willing to let the entire world know that those participating Rockefellers and O'Connors have to be pig-borns to be so confused that these two children are never theirs to manage or to have any saying over. This is regarding the "insist-on efforts" to express the opinion of "should raise these two children in monk style living forever".
One of the rumors is there is a Miss, parented by an American Rockefeller and an American O'Connor, is in financial desperation that frantically intend to pick up a left-over old man who fathers these two children and truly consider this would be a huge financial victory if succeed because pretending rich means nothing practical. I say, if so, why not make it public that is just a beggar-raised Miss Poor. The only curiosity left is, why this she would think she is eligible to have this fake name-power to be in another person's consideration of matrimony? That is not a practical consideration at all but a stupid enough one.
Another related rumor is an American David Petroves is a cousin to an American Jessica Petroves. The funny thing about this rumor is this Jessica Petroves shares the same mother with her half-sister Jessica Lissettes (radio Jessica) but looks like identical twins. The rumor is the mother had two birth of twins, but the 4 girls look like quadruplets. How two children from the same mother but a different father can look so identical? If you haven't heard, the rumor is the famous Duane-Reade pharmacist like to practice the performing art of "magically hol-hol-raise a chair" with his 4 identical looking girls at outdoor space often.
I heard this "Jessica Petroves", not sure which one in these two twins, kept on insisting to have this saying or that saying over my anything, I say I can't understand why she can insist on as if she has this power from I would want her sexuality desperately. I reject her illusion like such and I refuse to let anyone encourage her psycho fantasy like such.
The third related rumor, all these names have some power that related to "glass house cancer". I did call law enforcement's help regarding a lot of similar rumors.
----January 8th, 2018
01-07-2018 Chinese government inveighs me "fake" to rob my intellectual making and harm me biologically to rob my inheritances? (中国政府痛骂我 “假冒伪造” 是想掠夺我的智慧产权, 伤害我的身体健康是为了抢劫我所继承的财产？）
Heard this morning's broadcasting of why don't you explain to the Chinese government in Chinese? (中文附后)
My response:
When the Chinese government has been fighting for "the lawful rights" to teach English native American some English on a U.S. public radio channel just because they are all English major graduated from Chinese colleges?
When Chinese Premier Li is a Chinese college English major graduated as well and was in all three of 2004's meetings as himself stated in "no inheriting meeting" testimony,
When Chinese government insist on to broadcast confusion as if they don't know if I never have a biological child born in China, in college or in Nanjing Institute of Drug Control,
Why anyone would think in Chinese or in English makes any difference at all while knowing all they want to say is: "It is impossible that Min Fang can have any achievements" to help Albert Gore to rob every penny of my intellectual income to make their own share of "service charge".
I heard, since 2007, Albert Gore has used big accounting firms' good reputations to deposit checks' titled pay-to in my name to his own desired banking accounts the same day he announced "his desired ownership of the money" on the radio without any authorization from the lawful owner of the money (me on the pay-to title of the checks or the company that signed-out the checks), and I heard accountants' share of helping fee made the tricks of all my complained public robbery, is it possible that this is how some Chinese government officials intend to make their own private wealth? Or is it possible those fees have already been very handsome that I have been inveighed by the Chinese government as such, as so many people have heard from the radio? According to People's Republic of China's bribery rules developed since 1980, 20% of total transacted amount is considered appropriate share.
----January 7th, 2018
Heard this morning's broadcasting of me accusing Chinese military's participation of harming my health.
My response: From rumors I heard, the Chinese government has sent out its military staff to the U.S. to help make me full body infected of some virus, etc. since the same day Albert Gore announced his murderous intentions on the radio as "Let the little creature to take it over" in 2017.
I heard recent attempt of implanting some cancers on me according to published known cancer mechanisms was announced on the radio as "plan of letting me have this dynamic infection" by Albert Gore or his associated. I accused Albert Gore attempted murder for money.
I am protected by the United States government and the United States laws on my lawful intellectual making and my lawful inheritances.
----January 7th, 2018
Heard this morning's talk about 1989 Student movements and 1950 times government taking over private wealth in the People's Republic of China.
My response: I add some related that I heard of when I was in China:
1978, Chinese chairman Deng, Xiaoping announced Chinese government policy of "Allow some people to self-improve their lives through generating their lawful private wealth".
1980 times Chinese government announced policies of "Let Chinese citizens buy those for-sell factories or companies". Those for-sell businesses were selected because of their financial situations were all on-the-verge of bankruptcy.
I heard such selections were made from the consideration to keep the main economic system healthy to benefit the majority of the Chinese People.
The troubles it generated are:
Not many Chinese citizens could afford to buy in full if fair priced which caused a lot of controversy of how those businesses were sold.
Majority of those spin out business need to find their own way to survive, those employed and retired would lose their pension or salaries together with medical coverage permanently if fail. There was no major job market opened for them at all (only some affiliated companies by in-system business to benefit their own employees' families), and there was no social security provided for them by the government or China's then main economic system. Some of them were driven to the financial desperation that generated a lot of legal issues I named as PRC80 style scheme.
Those businesses were all on the verge of bankruptcy and how some of those businesses being fueled to thrive caused a lot of controversies that intellectual properties owned by "the Chinese People" who worked as scientists or engineers may have been robbed of their hard-making intellectual income.
In 1980-time, People's Republic of China start to have Patent Laws, but because of this "Owned by Chinese People" communist economic system, what should be the lawful share between the concept owner of "All Chinese People", the Institutes, or the scientists (engineers) were not clearly defined yet. This may have resulted that intellectual properties created by Chinese people who were scientists (engineers) of a research institute, were taken by another group of Chinese people who need these inventions free of any patent fees, all because both groups were part of the concept owner "The Chinese People" of those inventions.
My own experiences are what I have been complained about this "One-Eyed-Joy Bilking Scheme" through a public channeled radio program. The human's reproduction organ "One-Eyed-Joy" is like an umbrella concept that covers everybody's deservedness of my money on the radio, either being the authentic one truly enjoyed by a One-Eyed-Joy or owns a One-Eyed-Joy that associated with a person who owns a One-Eyed-Joy and participated some teleconferences in 2004.
Based on my own experiences of what happened to me through this radio program's producing, I assume the concept owner "the Chinese People" is like an umbrella that makes the lawful ownership transacted illegally through some organized purposeful explanation of Chinese government Policies of "Let Chinese citizens buy those for-sell factories or companies" is to "Allow some people to self-improve their lives through generating their lawful private wealth".
----January 7th, 2018
About 1989 Students movements and this administration of People's Republic of China's government.
My response:
First, this administration of People's Republic of China's government is grouped by those who were in their 30s in 1989. Those students, undergraduate and graduated, who marched on the streets were aged from 20-30s in 1989.
Second, 1989 Students movement was organized by whom? It started off by demanding memorial services to Chinese Youth Parties former leader: Hu, Yaobang (胡耀邦), how it turned violent that Tiananmen square was occupied by marching students?
The appeals students demanding were "Anti-Corruption (sexually and financially) and Democracy in China's Politics (National Election)". I was the person reported to China's Communist government that students’ movements on the streets were abnormal because these appeals were ridiculous.
For one, there had no single case of any media coverage of any government officials involved major corruption case that could cause this massive violent anger expression among college students.
If Chinese government policies in 1980 had sparked a lot of issues in China's then economy that hugely impact a lot of colleges' students' families and colleges' faculties and staffs, those appeals made by marching students had completely missed the points. All these issues were caused by China's government did not open the major job market for those laid-off or provide some level of social securities, or patent laws related issues, all may have some level of government officials’ involvements, but not really corruption issues.
For two, appeal to National Election a the major symbol of democracy, how a National Election could possibly achieve overnight? How to vote according to the understanding voting is to choose a person who could lead the nation without knowing the person-in-voting at all? Without this national election mechanism that could introduce the person-in-voting in place, national voting is just to vote a person to lead the nation by choosing this person's name blindly. My own personal opinion, a former administration's selection of the new administration, at least, wouldn't be so blindly as public of the People's Republic of China's citizens. How this "Introducing the person-in-voting" mechanism could possibly be developed overnight by answering college students marching on the streets?
And I also reported big amount donation collected on the streets were suspicious. Now, looking back, those suspicious activities may have something to do with those financially desperate laid-off workers. I do not know exactly what happened to those donations collected from streets in 1989.
After May of 1989's colleges' meeting, it was Chinese government organized to let students release our passion to express our love to China but not block traffic to negatively impact nation's economic activities or nation's economy.
----January 7th, 2018
About rumors that this administration of People's Republic of China's government is revenging for what happened on June 4th of 1989.
My response:
I repeat, this administration of People's Republic of China's government is grouped by those who were in their 30s in 1989. Almost everyone in this administration was in 1989's Chinese colleges' meeting organized by then Chinese government administration.
The huge problem I have with the People's Republic of China's government is why records of the 1989 Chinese Colleges' meeting cannot go public? All these confusion and anger about if 1989 Tiananmen square was a massacre was because these records did not open to the public. What is the reason Chinese government not willing to let Chinese citizens know Chinese government never order to kill those 1989 students. The order was to evacuate Tiananmen square with force.
"June 4th of 1989" was the People's Republic of China's then administration's decision. It was never a massacre. I suggested to use Chinese Military was because China had no anti-violence Police mechanism. Chinese then police officers were known for catching violent criminals by sacrificing their own lives since all the policing tools police officers could use were handcuffs. The problem was how to handcuff a violent criminal was not addressed by then Chinese justice system.
I suggested using tanks was because I knew Chinese Military's uniforms are made of fabric to keep enlisted dry and warm but not bulletproof, nor stoneproof or glasses-proof. I expressed this same understanding of History of Wars in Europe to the U.S. Military in January of 2004.
In 1989's colleges' meeting, I suggested open fire to those refuse to vacant Tiananmen Square was because of my consideration of the cost to evacuate the Tiananmen Square. I also suggested police officers and local Beijing city government to ensure anyone who was willing to evacuate from Tiananmen square could leave safely on forceful evacuating day: with police officers using speakers loudly asking everyone to leave and to awake anyone that possible in sleep, with the street lights on to point the safe road, etc. How about the safety of those Chinese Military's enlisted that being deployed to this mission? Stones and glasses could be deadly weapons that could cause some casualties. The Chinese Military open fire in Tiananmen square in 1989 was never meant to kill but to evacuate the Tiananmen square with force. Those bullets never after those who were leaving.
To protect deployed through advanced technology and medical technology as much as possible was also a major part of those orders I gave to U.S. Military Supply Corp as an active-enlisted U.S. Military 3-Stars General Strategist on July 1st of 2004.
**I am truly happy that I heard on January 8th of 2018: From satellite image records, there were protesters walked out of Tiananmen square alive after Chinese military's shooting out on June 4th of 1989. Please verify this information. (----January 8th, 2018)
**Some said, the Chinese government couldn't public the records of the 1989's College's teleconference is because there were some scary conversations that some anonymous people insisted on Chinese government needs to pay big money to govern protesting students. I say if you have heard radio program's 2017 Christmas times two weeks broadcasting, you know this is not scary but
Do you hear what I hear? Is that an Alzheimer or a psycho?( Third Item)
(----January 8th, 2018)
----January 7th, 2018
我的回应：我再加一些我在中国时听说的：
1978年，中国的国家主席邓小平号召“让一部分人先富裕起来”。
1980年代，中国政府公布了一系列政策“让一些人可以购买效益不好的企业（公司工厂）。” 那些可以让私人购买的公司工厂很多都是效益不好面临倒闭的公司工厂。
我听说了做这样的选择是出于保障主要的经济体制可以健康来稳定绝大多数中国人民的利益。
所造成的一些麻烦事：
所有这些企业都是在面临倒闭的边缘，其中的一些企业是如何绝处逢生的，也引发了很多争议，即是否中国人民中的一部分，也就是在大学或研究所工作的科学家工程师所创造的智慧产权被无偿掠夺了。
我自己的亲生经历，也就是我一直在抱怨的这个通过公共频道的广播剧播出所进行“以阳具招摇撞骗"活动。人类的生殖器官”阳具“就像是一个雨伞型的概念名词，覆盖了所要够资格向我要钱的理由，要么是被一条阳具在床上真正爱抚着的女人，要么就是拥有一条阳具并和一个在2004年参加过电讯会议的某一条阳具有点什么样的关系。
根据我自己的这个由广播剧播出所产生的亲身经历，我估计这”中国人民”就像是一个雨伞型的概念名词，让法律上的产权拥有者被非法置换，通过的手段可能就是某种有组织进行的对中国政府政策“让一些人可以购买一些效益不好企业”就是”让一部分人先富裕起来”的解释。
----2018年1月7日。
游行学生的诉求是：“反贪污，反腐败，要民主！” 听说了民主诉求主要是想要通过公开选取来产生政府。是我向中国政府汇报学生在街上的游行示威某名奇妙且很不正常。
当时能够买得起这些面临倒闭企业的中国人民很少很少，所以就造成很多疑问“这些企业是如何标价出售的？”
绝大多数被主要的经济体制边缘化的企业都需要自负盈亏，如果这些工厂公司难以实现自负盈亏，企业的员工就面临永远没有了工资，永远没有了退休金，也永远没有了医疗报销的处境。当时既没有主要的再就业市场（就只有一些效益好的企事业单位办的"三产"照顾他们自己的职工家属）， 也没有由政府或由当时的主流经济体制可以向他们提供的所需的社保医保。他们中的一些人就此面临家庭收入绝境而产生了很多的被我称为PRC80模式伎俩的社会和法律问题。
所有这些企业都是在面临倒闭的边缘，其中的一些企业是如何绝处逢生的，也引发了很多争议，即是否中国人民中的一部分，也就是在大学或研究所工作的科学家工程师所创造的智慧产权被无偿掠夺了。
八十年代，中华人民共和国已经开始有了专利相关的法规，但是因为这个“全民所有制“的经济体制，在国家，研究院集体和科学家工程师个人之间应该如何分配所创造的智慧产权还没有法律上的清晰界定。这些有可能造成了中国人民中的一部分所创造的智慧产权被中国人民中的另一部分无偿获取，就只因为这些发明专利是属于这么一个概念上的抽象的“中国人民所拥有的”。
我自己的亲生经历，也就是我一直在抱怨的这个通过公共频道的广播剧播出所进行“以阳具招摇撞骗"活动。人类的生殖器官”阳具“就像是一个雨伞型的概念名词，覆盖了所要够资格向我要钱的理由，要么是被一条阳具在床上真正爱抚着的女人，要么就是拥有一条阳具并和一个在2004年参加过电讯会议的某一条阳具有点什么样的关系。
根据我自己的这个由广播剧播出所产生的亲身经历，我估计这”中国人民”就像是一个雨伞型的概念名词，让法律上的产权拥有者被非法置换，通过的手段可能就是某种有组织进行的对中国政府政策“让一些人可以购买一些效益不好企业”就是”让一部分人先富裕起来”的解释。
----2018年1月7日。
有关1989年的学运和中华人民共和国的这一届政府。
我的回应：
首先，这一届中国人民共和国的政府是由1989年时30多岁的一批人所组建的。1989年时的上街游行学生包括本科和研究生，也就是20，30多岁的那些。
其次，1989年的学生运动当时谁组织的？最早是1989年的清明节4月5日前后，开始是纪念中国共青团的前任书记胡耀邦，怎么就变成了学生们占据了天安门广场向中国政府示威了？
游行学生的诉求是：“反贪污，反腐败，要民主！” 听说了民主诉求主要是想要通过公开选取来产生政府。是我向中国政府汇报学生在街上的游行示威某名奇妙且很不正常。
第一：当时就没有任何媒体公开报道的贪污腐败分子能引发如此社会公愤造成大学的学生们上街游行表达愤怒不满
如果当时中国政府的经济政策所造成的很多问题影响到了很多在校大学生的家庭及一些大学的老师们，这些上街游行的诉求根本是偏题很远。当时的社会问题是政府没有向这些下岗人员提供再就业所需的劳务市场，也没有社保医保等社会保障系统提供维持生活所需的经济支持，或者专利法相关的一些矛盾，这些问题可能都牵涉到一些中国当时的政府官员，但不是什么贪污腐败问题。
第二：诉求公开选举作为实现中国民主化的标志，公开选举那有可能可以按照游行学生的要求一夜之间就实现？选举是为了通过投票选出投票人心目中可以领到中国这个国家的领袖人物，没有对参选人的了解，中国人民如何按照对选举的这份理解来进行全民公开投票？没有一份可以让中国人民了解参选人的机制的情况下，全民公开选举也就是让老百姓对着一个个陌生的名字而胡选乱选。我个人的意见，在这种情况下，由上一届政府推荐产生的新一届政府至少比老百姓对着陌生的名字选要好很多。这个“让人民了解参选人”的选举机制哪有可能在1989年的一夜之间就可以按照游行学生的诉求而产生啊？
我当时也汇报了街上收集的群众捐款下落可疑。现在回头看，可能那些正经历着家庭经济绝境的下岗人员是捐款下落不明的一部分原因。我完全不清楚1989年学生游行期间所收集捐款的下落。
1989年五月的全国高校会议之后，是中国政府组织各地在不妨碍交通及国家的经济建设活动的前提下，让学生们通过游行表达爱国热情。
----2018年1月7日。
我对中国政府很大的一个投诉就是为什么不公开1989年全国高校会议的记录? 所有这些因为1989年是否是中国政府在屠杀学生都是因为当时的全国高校会议记录没有公开。是什么原因中国政府就是不愿意让中国人民了解中国政府从来就没有下令屠杀天安门广场的游行学生。当时的军令是武装清理天安门广场。
有关这一届中国政府是在为1989年的6月4日复仇的传言。
我的回应：这一届中国人民共和国的政府是由1989年时30多岁的一批人所组建的。这一届政府的每一个组要成员都参加了1989年的全国高校会议。
我对中国政府很大的一个投诉就是为什么不公开1989年全国高校会议的记录? 所有这些因为1989年是否是中国政府在屠杀学生都是因为当时的全国高校会议记录没有公开。是什么原因中国政府就是不愿意让中国人民了解中国政府从来就没有下令屠杀天安门广场的游行学生。当时的军令是武装清理天安门广场。
1989年的“武力六·四清理天安门广场”是中华人民共和国当时那一届政府的决定，从来不是什么屠杀。是我建议了中国政府使用中国军队进行武力清理， 原因就是当时的中华人民共和国没有防止及处理暴力事件的防暴警察机制。中国当时的警察只有不惧牺牲自己才能制服穷凶极恶的犯罪分子是很有名的，当时的警察所能使用执法工具就只有手铐，但是当时的中国司法部门可能没有考虑到如何才能把手铐拷上犯罪分子的手上其实是很有挑战性的。
是我建议了使用坦克，因为我知道中国军人的军装是用纤维制作，只有保暖及抵挡风雨的功能，不防子弹不防石块也不放玻璃碴子。这和我在2004年一月的时候向美军谈我对欧洲战争史火枪手方阵作战的理解是同样的。
在1989年的全国高校会议上，我是有建议对拒绝离开天安门广场的作开枪处理，这是出于我对武力清理天安门广场可能付出代价的考虑。我也同时建议了由当时没有任何武器装备的北京地方政府及当地警察确保愿意离开广场的人员在任何时候都可以安全离开：用手提高音喇叭高音量劝说滞留广场人员服从政府指示离开广场，用路灯提供广场人员安全撤离通道的照明，等等。那些执行此项武力清理天安门的中国军人，他们的安全如何保障？石头和玻璃瓶子是可以致命的武器有可能会造成中国军方清理广场人员伤亡的。中国军方1989年在天安门广场开枪从来不是为了屠杀学生，就只是武力清理广场，我听说的是那些中国人民解放军的子弹完全没有追着射向那些已经开始撤离的广场人员。
用先进的科技及医学技术保护执行军务人员的安全是我在2004年7月1日以在役美国三星将军参谋长身份向美国军队的后勤部门下达的命令中的很大一部分。
**2018年1月8日，我听到了非常开心的消息，卫星图像记录显示，在1989年6月4日那天，北京天安门广场有不止一个示威人员在中国人民解放军结束武力清理天安门广场的军事行动后还活着并且自己走出了天安门广场。请89年学运人士核实。（----2018年1月8日）
**2018年1月8日，我听到了非常开心的消息，卫星图像记录显示，在1989年6月4日那天，北京天安门广场有不止一个示威人员在中国人民解放军结束武力清理天安门广场的军事行动后还活着并且自己走出了天安门广场。请89年学运人士核实。（----2018年1月8日）
**有人说，中国政府不公开1989年全国高校会议记录是因为其中有一段对话非常吓人，当时有几个无名人士坚持要让中国付钱才可以管理街上游行的学生，我说啊，在听了2017年圣诞节时那两个星期的广播剧播出，你就知道一点都不可怕，根本就是：
我有没有听错啊, 那是一群老年痴呆，还是一群精神病人啊？（第三段）
（---2018年1月8日）
我有没有听错啊, 那是一群老年痴呆，还是一群精神病人啊？（第三段）
（---2018年1月8日）
----2018年1月7日。
01-06-2018 Some Issues of My Intellectual Incomes--Radio Program's Producing Team and Albert Gore
Heard this morning's broadcasting of the argument why my mother needs to survive?
My response: This is the question similar to why I have to be homeless or my father needs to survive?
I heard that on July 1st of 2004, the person advised that I needed to be homeless is the same person advised that my mother needs to survive. This same person also advised that my father should not be united with me if intend to live longer.
The person's name is Fang, Zhiqiang( 方志强), this Fang, Zhiqiang ( 方志强) has no biological association with my father, my mother or I. I heard he was invited into the July 1st of 2004's meeting or offered the microphone on July 1st of 2004's meeting by Albert Gore. I heard this Fang, Zhiqiang ( 方志强) was once featured on the radio program as a possible heir from Zu's family(明朝朱家) and I heard that same episode cleared it is untrue by Zu's family.
I heard my father in the current needs-to-survive situation is because of Chinese Premier Li. Chinese Premier Li is rumored an in-law to Fang, Zhiqiang( 方志强)
----January, 6th, 2018
Why Albert Gore's name is in all these?
My response: I was told he got a key to enter my locked-door self-paid apartment to have sex with me during my sound sleep. And I was told in the same meeting later that his friend uploaded an evidence video clip of this on the internet for at least several minutes.
I doubted that in 2004 very much because I knew for certain that I had checked if my apartment door locked before I went to bed daily. It means Albert Gore had raped me if what I was told is true and it means I was threatened if I dare to say I was never a whore at all to this Albert Gore.
I came from an Emperors' family that I knew what this means to the person I never even met in person. Other than a possible chance in 2001 or 2002 that he was with a political campaign group visited my complex in Corona, NY, I never met Albert Gore. That group was a 4-persons group that includes 2 Chinese. One of the two is John Liu(刘醇逸)。They only stayed in my building's hallway outside my apartment for less than 5 minutes and I only saw them for less than one minute. I did not recognize anybody in that group at that moment.
I chose to do something necessary about the internet broadcasting of the rape video but tried to leave some room in case there was something fishy. That was the reason I asked his uncle's and his father's law firms to represent one of my inheritance Fund.
I needed to have new attorneys on that day was because my misunderstanding on why I was neglected to constant crying when I was in Janus Associates, a computer consulting company in Connecticut. I did realize in 2016 that I directed my anger wrongfully to the female attorney in 2004 and I sincerely apologize to her here again, this time is also from my understanding that let me safe inherit my trusts is more important than help to stop my cries.
I heard Albert Gore was the person kept complaining that U.S. Military should not let me giving those orders to Supply Corp on July 1st of 2004.
I have to say I was an in-service 3-Stars U.S. Military General Strategist on that day and I gave out my orders to U.S. Military Supply Corp when all the U.S. Military 5-Stars and 4-Stars Generals were presented. I was authorized to make all those requests because they all knew I was doing so as a U.S. Military's Strategist on an assignment to improve U.S. Military's combat capabilities. That was the reason I could give out my orders to U.S. Military's Supply Corp when I was a U.S. Military's combat officer.
I was a citizen of the People's Republic of China on that day, but there was no war or interest conflicts at all between the People's Republic of China and the United States on that day. All those requests were not aimed to weaken the People's Republic of China's Military's combat capabilities.
I have nothing to do with Albert Gore. I rejected to have any romantic possibilities with Albert Gore even in-jokes on July 1st of 2004. I have some huge problems with Albert Gore currently because his name is on almost all these issues I have kept complaining and I have kept asking Law Enforcement's help.
----January 6th, 2018
Heard this morning's broadcasting of "Who the fxxx you think you are".
My response: I heard that were from four most famous American-Chinese movie stars: Joan Chen(陈冲), Lucy Liu( 刘玉玲), Bai Ling(白灵), and Vivian Wu(邬君梅).
I do not know why they are so angry since they all aware I was never in movie or TV industry. I only have this radio program which I never participated any producing efforts. My relationship with the entertainment industry is just being an investor.
This is the same reason nobody doubted that I have nothing to do with another famous Chinese famous movie star Zhang Ziyi's(章子怡) romance stories in 2009 or so.
And this is the same reason that I am currently in this situation that my own radio program has been the reason I have been shited all over.
----January 6th, 2018
About this radio program producing-share and my share of being a major featured person.
My response: This has been the major hurdle of understanding the anger towards me from a lot of literature persons.
It was broadcasted some time ago that some writers could not understand why it is half-half on intellectual income share-split between my and producing team. Fiction writers never need to pay for anybody inspired their books. Why I am paid handsomely?
The difference is fiction writers are just inspired by the story, this radio program is to produce my story. It is similar to the difference between a script-writer and fiction-writer. The script-write writes based on fiction-writer fiction, this producing team produce based on stories of my life and my video-audio materials from recordings of my life that I provided.
The producing team's proud is different with my proud, it is similar to the different proud that script-writer has when the movie is based on a popular best-seller.
I heard there are at least two professions, by laws, are not allowed to be creative: Accounting Profession and Law profession. Both will be facing federal and state felony charges if dare to build-up an accounting book or build-up a case.
This is maybe the reason it has been very hard for my attorneys to understand what all these anger towards me are about: According to laws and regulations, half-half on intellectual income share-split between my and radio program's producing team already means I have not been participating any radio program's producing efforts at all.
A reference to this, the literature person in this illustration is the script-writer:
Heard about confusion how intellectual contributions can be appropriately acknowledged and rewarded.
My response: I use a very publicly familiar group of people, movie producing team, to illustrate this.
I have this great idea this "blah blah" can be a great movie;
A literature person agreed and write a script from my "blah blah" story.
A person who knows how to make a movie agreed and called in a group to make a movie.
This group of people includes a movie director, actresses and actors and supporting staff.
My "blah blah" story thus turned into a very popular movie.
I am so proud I am the creator of this movie that attracted so many people.
The literature person is so proud of being the scriptwriter that wrote so many great lines.
The producer is so proud this is a popular movie.
The group of people is so proud of the directing, or the roles they played, or the settings/costumes designed, etc.
Who contributed what, or how well contributed, or what is the appropriate reward is all very clear to all of us that participated this turns "blah blah" into a popular movie.
It is the same in manufacturing industries or service-providing industries.
----Dec. 8th, 2017
----January 6th, 2017
01-05-2018 This morning's two Chinese children and confusion of Creator of Beijing Olympic Opening (今天早上的两个中国小孩以及谁是北京奥运会创意人的困扰）
Heard about this morning's broadcasting of two children. （中文附后）
My response: They are both People's Republic of China's citizens, their parents are as they announced. The British East Indy Company Financier is not the Fund I own.
I own the British East India Company Financier Fund and my children are U.S. citizens who can pronounce the differentiation between "India" and "Indy".
It is rumored they were invited by a Jessica whose husband had met me in a Hyatt Regional Hotel's Bar on the next day I met a group of U.S. military officers in 2003. He made some comments about if I have a dancer's body in 2004 that bothers this Jessica very much.
----January 5th, 2018
Heard about this morning's broadcasting of helping me manage my money.
My response: I do have accountants and business representatives helping me managing my investments.
I did make such a joke in 2004 or in 2007 that I can let my father managing my allowance to let him satisfy some craving of spending some money but spending has to be according to my instructions, I joked about this in more than one occasions including saying it to my father himself. But on each occasion, I made it very clear it is my own biological lawful father I was joking about, never anyone else.
I enjoy teasing my own father, I heard that is how my ancient grandfather(李隆基） had enjoyed teasing my beauty grandmother（杨玉环). It is the teasing between me and my own birth father.
I heard someone says why don't I let myself be teased by whoever? I respond it with:"Who the Fxxx do you think you are? I send you to the court every time you try, civil or criminal, ."
Now I am announcing here that I changed my mind about it. I refuse to let anyone manage my any non-investment money which includes my allowance.
----January 5th, 2018
About rumored confusion of who is the creator of Beijing Olympic Opening.
My response: I heard the confusion is from a video CD that was broadcasted on the radio in China. The female in that video CD dressed in Chinese ancient style, not sure if voice data is the same as mine. This can be checked by forensic technology(司法鉴定), voice or recorded time. Mine was done and should be recorded in June of 2004.
I heard mine was recorded in June of 2004 by FBI during their investigation of possible intellectual properties related case that I reported in January of 2004, and I heard it was an FBI agent who gave the copy of this recording to the Chinese Consulate in New York City.
I think the Chinese producing team of the Beijing Olympic Opening/Closing Ceremony, the group of people who have been very familiar with performing arts, know the difference between the voice of a creator or a voice of a performing actress. The difference between the video images is the same.
I created those ideas from the Chinese culture that I brought up with and I have lived my life by, instead of creating some ideas from what I thought should be introduced to the world according to what Chinese have achieved over the history. I was introducing the Chinese culture that has made me a being of a Chinese.
I created those ideas from the depth of my understanding of the Chinese culture that the mimic performer won't be able to reproduce. It was not the confidence or just the passion in the voice that makes the difference but the true reflection that I have the in-depth knowledge of what I was talking about. The video images are the same.
A performing artist won't have that reflection of the knowledge in the voice that a person who has the knowledge can have, no matter how well this performing artist can mimic the person who has the knowledge.
----January 5th, 2018
有关谁是奥运会创意人的争议是怎么回事？
我的回应：听说了奥运会创意人的困扰是来自一盘影碟，这影碟2008年北京奥运会之前有在中国国内的广播电台里播出过。影碟里的女性身着中式衣服或者中式古装，不清楚声音资料是否还是我方敏的。但这是可以通过司法鉴定来查实的， 不管是声音或是录制时间（可以精确到千分之一秒）都有技术可以鉴定。我是在2004年6月的一个星期天做的北京奥运会的创意，录影录音时间也应该是同一天。
我听说我的创意是在2004年6月由联邦调查局在调查由我于2004年1月举报的一桩有关智慧产权的案件时录制的，我听说是由一个联邦调查局的探员把这段录影（录音）交给了纽约的中国领事馆。
我认为北京奥运会开幕式及闭幕式的创作团队，是非常熟悉什么是表演艺术的一群人，他们很清楚一个创意人创意时的声音和一个演员在表演这个场景时的声音之间的区别。两者影像资料之间的区别也是如此。
我的那些创意是从伴随我成长以及每天生活着的中国文化中所产生的创意，不是我看着中国的历史年鉴表上所记录的中国历史上的伟大成就而选择了一些我认为应该介绍给世界人民所孕育的创意。我当时是在介绍让我方敏成为了一个华人的这么一个中国文化。
我的创意是源自我对中国文化的理解程度，不是一个演员的表演可以模仿重现的。这份区别不是在声音里的那份自信或者一些激情，而是这声音真实反映了我确实拥有我所谈论的这个中国文化的相关知识以及我拥有什么程度中国文化知识的那一份深度感。影像资料也是如此。
不管一个表演艺术家如何模仿，一个表演艺术家的声音里没有可能会有一个真正拥有知识者的声音里所能呈现的那份真实的有深度的知识感。
----2018年1月5日。
01-04-2018 Why all these willingness to pay for someone to trash me?
Heard this morning's broadcasting of my gifts been thrown out.
My response: I did hear this rumor before yesterday and I did send out a message asking if the dumplings I made as a gift would be thrown out. Anyway, she threw as she wishes and I did get the point this is not the person need my gift or my companionship.
Also, I heard this morning a Mr. Petroves announced $1000 monthly providing each to the same person and another person, it is of course as he wishes as long as that is this Mr. Petroves own money. This Mr. Petroves does not represent my inheritance Fund and he should not have his individual capital account in my inheritance Fund (agreed-upon providing is not in an individual's name but in the family name, one payment in full per year). He has no access to my money unless he makes an inappropriate phone call to the F holding's investor American Fund which is a British Fund's child Fund, and a French Fund's grandchild Fund. My capital accounts are not in these Funds but in my trusts that set up these Funds, and I did call law enforcement's help on a lot of rumored inappropriate phone calls of performing-arts of demanding money from business-spending-budget that made by some other people already.
The only curiosity is why this Mr. Petroves would willing to give money out to reward this two person who is willing to throw out my $20-$40 or so gifts. I only gave out two gifts this year. The other person is the one I adopted my cat from($150 adoption) last year. If he is a brother to a Jessica Petroves, why would this wealthy Mr. Petroves let his sister a Mistress equivalent to another wealthier person? I received this responding message:
This is the message I sent this morning after I heard rumors about radio broadcasting and I did remove the entry from my contact list: "Hello, I am so sorry I am not going to continue my Bible study with you. And I knew I made a very inappropriate promise yesterday about if I have money I will help you to have your own biological child while you are very certain I should not, so I take every word back. Please remove me from your contact list as I am doing now. Thanks for all those past Wednesdays"
I received this responding message: "I don’t understand what you mean. I never said that you shouldn’t have your own biological child! I would never impose on you like that. Frankly, I’m too old for a child, biological or otherwise... Well, I apologize for any misunderstanding we may have had. It saddens me that we can’t have a conversation about it. However, as you wish. Truly, It’s been my pleasure to introduce you to the Creator of the Heavens and the earth. Take care of yourself ".
Heard this morning's argument about Petroves'(Pejoves?) money.
----January 4th, 2018
Heard the rumor there is a British entrusting attorney of mine is a notorious person's in-law.
My response: That person is notorious for organizing this shit-me-all over to make illegal financial gains. This rumored British entrusting attorney is most likely part of such scheme as well because this rumored attorney is expected to have the power to give out my money. Last year or so, there were some members of Chinese my inheritances supervision committee insisted on having saying over my spending, possibly the same scheme.
----January 4th, 2018
About so many confusions regarding my biological children.
My response: I did make my points on Boston 96.9FM in November or December of 2015 when it was rumored he is not good enough to be his father's heir and anyone who is willing can be called the father of my biological children.
My point I made was: If he does not need to be his own biological father's heir and he does not need to be the person who father my biological children, who he should be or where and how this radio program intend to place him? I add my explanation about my point here: Is this means he can just be a worker with a new name to work in a factory to make some minimum wage for some food on the table? Also, who should be his replacement to his wealthy birth father? With all these confusion if I have biological children and who should be their father, exactly, who needs all these confusion and what is the purpose?
I have my own personal experience of how I should not enjoy my own hard-earned intellectual making or my own birth grandfather' hard-earned money I inherited, but to work in some restaurant for some food and live a beggar's life as you all heard from the radio program. I did call law enforcement's help constantly with this kind of personal experiences.
For my own experiences, it is rumored that there is a radio program's director, a Shanghainese, who thinks that I do not need anything at all to be my ancient Emperor grandfather's heir. And I did respond to this rumor that this Shanghainese director certainly does not need his biological limbs (his arms & his legs) as well as his hip section with his buttocks and his penis) at all to be a director of this radio program and beyond.
It also rumored that this Shanghainese director is an in-law to the female who mothers several most important Chinese national leaders' only child. The rumor means the only child for each most important person, of course.
----January 4th, 2018
01-03-2018 Sexual harassment is a Crime for very good reasons and who my father and grandfather resemble (性骚扰是犯罪行为及我爷爷和我父亲长得像谁？）
Heard this morning's broadcasting about not privileged to shit his relative no matter how agitated I am.（中文附后）
My response:Well, I heard the person saying so is actually a cousin to Albert Gore, the person who organized all these shits threw at me in order to illegally own my lawful wealth through radio-broadcasting all these shits towards me to perform this public robbery by using made up stories to belittle me and to arouse public hostility against me.
But let me apologize to the person I thought I was shitting and the family I shitted by mistake, and explain myself a bit here. In order to perform this public robbery, the scandal like radio program shamed my name to single out my biological children to be exposed as no mother's protection and unwanted by father side's relative to be such easy targets to be abused by whoever is willing. I have no choice but to make my voice heard that they do have a wealthy mother who does have their mother side's own resources to protect them even if they are unwanted by the father's side. The boy and girl are well known my biological children for real to everyone who has dealings with them. They are over seven years old now. And I appreciate greatly for all the efforts to shield them from becoming possible public targets.
Everybody in New York city may already be heard all those shits threw that intend to abuse my children are from some O'Connors. It is rumored that either this Miss O'Connor or that Miss O'Connor has to be his wife or my inheritance Fund has to be owned by O'Connors. I have been refusing all these kinds of threats I heard from rumors.
Everybody in New York city may already be heard all those shits threw that intend to abuse my children are from some O'Connors. It is rumored that either this Miss O'Connor or that Miss O'Connor has to be his wife or my inheritance Fund has to be owned by O'Connors. I have been refusing all these kinds of threats I heard from rumors.
----January 3rd, 2018
Heard this morning's Jessica Lopez's such powerful curse.
My response: I heard this Jessica Lopez's powerful voice is not powered by the "rich husband" she announced on the radio, but powered by her sister being the wife to a cousin of Albert Gore.
----January 3rd, 2018
My response: I heard this Jessica Lopez's powerful voice is not powered by the "rich husband" she announced on the radio, but powered by her sister being the wife to a cousin of Albert Gore.
----January 3rd, 2018
About my Ancestors featured in those paintings that were published in 2011 or so.
My response: There were four paintings published with year-certificate displayed as 1 year's old to tell they were just copies. Those painters copied them from originals' digital copies.
One of the huge problems I have with this administration of People's Republic of China's government is that a disk contains digital copies of all those published has been sent to them before those copied paintings were published. I had mentioned this on Boston 96.9FM in 2015 time.
In that disk, there were 6 painting featured with its originals' year-certificate and detailed zoom-ins to present techniques used in those paintings which certainly can be identified by historians who are specialized on these.
I am excited this morning because I heard the two not-published paintings included in that disk were to present my father's(方文海） resemblances to my ancient grandfather Emperor Xuanzong of Tang (唐玄宗李隆基）in that 6 boys painting. That generation there were 6 Princes. The other one who featured 4 Princes was to present my grandfather(方智仁）resembled my ancient grandfather Emperor Gaozong of Tang(唐高宗李治). If anyone can verify this would be really great.
I was like I finally realized that no wonder my father is known for blind-equivalent because of nearsighted with Retinal detachments since I was in high school, it is because I resemble extremely to the beautiful wife of my ancient grandfather Emperor Xuanzong of Tang (唐玄宗李隆基) who he resembles extremely.
My poor old man, he had been stationed in desserts alone when he was an enlisted bachelor surveyor-cartographer. After he has me, it has been all about what I want and how to stop me from squirring I want this or that, things I wanted had been ranged from food to everything else. I heard recently when he is already in his 80s, he was asked if he could recall any achievements from his profession of Astrophysics. And I published on this blog to tell him that I am his provider that providing him the same as myself on medical health related even that is our shared grandfathers' money I inherited. He knows I am the daughter he can live on.
----January 3rd, 2018
关于2011年左右发布的我祖先的画像。
我的回应：2011年左右广播剧相关网站发布过4张附有标明只有一年的年份证书的临摹油画。画家们是按照原版画像的电子版本临摹的。
我对中华人民共和国这一届政府很大的投诉就是我有听说中国政府在这几张油画临摹板本公布之前是有收到原版的附有原版年份鉴定电子版本碟盘的。我2015年在波士顿96.9FM有提到这点。
在那盘碟子里，一共有六张油画的电子版本，都附有原版油画的年份鉴定证明，及可放大的细节以展示唐代画法及技巧以供画史研究人员鉴别鉴定真伪。
我今天早上很开心的听说那两张没有公布的油画是为了展示我父亲方文海长的像极了在那张6个兄弟的画像里的唐玄宗李隆基，而另一张4个兄弟的油画像是为了展示我的爷爷方智仁像极了画像里的唐高宗李治。要是有人能证实这点就太好了。
我感觉就像恍然大悟了一般，怪道从我高中开始，我父亲就是有名的高度近视眼加视网膜剥离，什么也看不清，原来是因为我这个女儿长的像极了唐玄宗爷爷的美女妻子，而他这个父亲自己长得像极了唐玄宗李隆基爷爷。
我可怜的老爸爸，他年轻单身的时候是驻扎在沙漠当测绘兵。等他有了我这个女儿以后，就一直是围绕着我想要什么或者怎么才能让我不扯着嗓门的要这要那，而我想要的东西，那是吃的喝的用的什么都想要。我最近还听说在他已经80多岁的现在，他还被别人讥讽他作为天体物理学家有过什么职业上的成就没有啊？（听说就是北京天文台的那几个人，其中一个就是那个一口咬定是“头胎女儿”的妈妈）。而我还在这个博客里和他说虽然我所继承的信托是由我们共同的爷爷们设立的，但信托是设立给我的，所以钱是我的，所以是我在出钱养他并且很愿意让他有和我一样规格的医疗健康供给。不过他知道他是可以非常安心地靠我这个女儿养着的。
----2018年1月3日。
01-02-2017 About my investment in China and 我当然会说这些话啊。（中文附后）
Heard this morning's talk about my possible investment in China should be destroyed even if run by local Chinese.
My response: With this morning's broadcasting, and regarding rumored People's Republic of China's government would block my inheritance Funds to invest in China, I publish here what I had published on my school MBA506 discussion board two or three months ago: If my investment in China means business only needs to get very busy with tons of nesses but definitely not the profits, and my capital account in the investment means deserved to reduce against my wish, blocking my inheritance Funds to invest in China can only be understood by me as Financial Security provided. I am adding here with: it may be an extreme measure in orange colored (maybe even red colored) alarming circumstances caused by a possibly severely corrupted government. I also said in this web blog some days ago that it sounds like a criminal gang insists on calling themselves a government but specialized in performing illegal whore business, bilking and threatening for money in excuse of severe jealousy caused by self-illusion-ed fake romances, etc.
----January 2nd, 2018
我当然会说这些话啊。
我的回应：我是有说过：“我就等着中华人民共和国的子弹射进他们的脑门里。”
整个方敏事件，就是因为中华人民共和国的一些人不学无术，不懂什么是智慧产权，似乎也完全不懂任何公司账目上的任何钱财从来不是一个两个高级经理可以随便以智慧产权收入为理由任意送人的（美国没有小金库，财会审计也很严格），却坚持自己就是乐意，就是够资格指手划解说三道四，外加就是想通过“协助将方敏所继承的合法财产非法换个主人”要点钱而已，闹得天翻地覆。
就美国公民阿尔伯特·高尔公然利用广播剧破坏方敏名誉以掠夺方敏智慧产权收入，方敏已寻求美国警方协助要求将方敏我自己挣的智慧产权收入的每一分钱都按照法律归方敏我自己拥有， 中国政府方面可向美国联邦调查局核查是否已立案处理。
其实就我方敏是否有挣到这么多的智慧产权收入就只需核查“贡献是否确实是方敏所做，方敏所做贡献奖励是否恰当”就可以，完全就只是美国的智慧产权相关法律管辖范围，却是由中国政府出面就此对方敏进行漫天泼屎喷粪的羞辱谩骂造谣诽谤的破坏名誉行为。
中国政府还以我在中华人民共和国长大从未拥有财产为名坚称我是假冒伪造，完全罔顾中华人民共和国自1949年以来所实施的不允许合法私有财产及一切财富归全民所有制的事实，也完全不予考虑我方敏所强调的我所继承信托是在1949年中国大陆解放之前就已信托国外的事实，甚至不允许已成为美国公民的我方敏拥有任何合法子女甚至任何婚姻家庭子女已达到让我方敏”断子绝孙无以为继”来协助掠夺我方敏所继承财产的目的，造成方敏事件如此地步。我方敏那有可能不说这些话呢？
至于今天早上提到的我同父同母弟弟的婚姻家庭，在我和我弟弟的婚姻家庭有法律范畴内的矛盾纠纷时，我方敏永远选择在乎生我养我的父亲方文海母亲王博贤更多一些，我方敏永远选择在乎我自己的亲生子女更多一些，我方敏永远选择捍卫我方敏自己及我方敏自己亲生子女的合法权益。我弟弟的婚姻子女是我弟弟的责任和义务，永远都不是我的责任和义务。我方敏永远都认为拥有亲情是在拥有自己的合法权益的基础之上的。
听说中国的一群老妇女对英国威廉王子可能和我育有子女传闻闹吃醋造成方敏事件整个就是一起由中华人民共和国政府组织主导的中华人民共和国的女性公民们的国际卖淫活动。
我所知道的是：方敏我2004年所继承的信托及信托所投资的基金中包括英国的东印度公司投资基金和英国的另几家基金，其中的东印度公司投资基金和另一家基金近一两百年以来都一直是由英国王储代为表达英国王室想要拥有的基金，基金工作人员也一直是被数代英国王储们粗暴对待着以表达不能合法拥有的不满。所以当我2004年继承并合法拥有这两家英国基金时，才会有很多人愿意相信英国王储威廉王子可能和我婚娶通过由我所出的下一代英国王储可以让英国王室合法拥有这两个英国人为之深为骄傲的基金而引发我和英国威廉王子可能育有子女传言。
英国王室及英国政府已就此类传言作出澄清，我方敏就是不明白这关中国政府什么事？还需要由中国政府出面羞辱谩骂方敏以表达华人就是不配和英国王室有婚姻子女关系，这哪里还是一届代表着13亿中国公民的华人政府啊？
----2017年1月2日
01-01-2018 Happy New Year
To my own biological children:
Happy New Year, my dearest darlings, my sweethearts.
To my own children's father and grandparents:
Happy New Year!
To everyone who I owe my BIG THANKS for their caring and love towards my own children:
Happy New Year!
To my own birth father:
Happy New Year!
老爸爸， 新年快乐！
To my own birth mother who I wish with all my heart can still alive and read this blog:
Happy New Year!
妈妈，真心希望你还在，能听到我对你说“祝你新年快乐！”
妈妈：如果你还在，不用担心你的生活供给，女儿我在2004年7月1日我办理信托我所继承到爷爷们给我设立的那些信托基金时就态度很好的表态说你的生活当然是有我负责啦，我当天当时就决定了你的生活供给和老爸爸是同等规格的，着重身体健康和基本生活保障。你从来就不是我的负担。😇😇
老爸爸：回顾我的财产继承，我最感谢的是你和爷爷方智仁。
要不是方智仁爷爷小时候成天扯着个嗓门要把家里的东西都给捐了，曾祖父也不会赶着紧得就把那些好东西全办理信托给我了。
要不是你把爷爷方智仁给你的亲笔遗嘱信看也不看就给扔了，让亲眼看见你扔了遗嘱信的爷爷方智仁像热锅上的蚂蚁似的在病床坚持了整整一个月，我小时候的日子会好点，我来美国留学也不用打餐馆，可我就没有机会在2004年7月1日态度很好的表态说：老爸爸的生活当然是有我负担啦。我当时就说了就凭我自己挣的钱都够， 你和妈妈的健康医疗供给和我是同等规格。
还有，如果有人问，我所继承的那些信托里是否有方家其他人的钱，你就回答说没有。就像爷爷方智仁1965年在上海去世前有给你们兄弟姊妹每人一份亲笔信及银行定期存折之类的一样，每一代爷爷去世前都有给他自己下一代所有儿子交代后事及分配财产，每一代都如此。我方敏拿到的爷爷们替我设立的那些信托都是爷爷们另外给我的，没有方家任何其他人的钱在里面。我是家里从2500年前至今唯一的一个女孩有着家里的继承胎记掌纹。
还有，我们家曾祖父之前的爷爷们可能有一些已改了家族姓氏的其他房的子女。我拿到的钱和他们也是一点关系都没有。
还有，就是听说北京天文台有一对夫妻，1975年左右在北京为你替我买了一条￥7元的裙子和你吵得很凶说您凭什么不给他们的女儿也买条裙子的那对，他们的女儿就跟中了邪一样，认定她自己是你未婚所生的一个女儿，就是因为她自己听说了你在她妈妈怀上她的前一周有去北京出差（1965年）。不过不用担心了。我听说已经查了当年的卫星影像资料，你在整个出差期间都没有拜访过她母亲本人或者她母亲的办公室。我还没弄明白他们夫妻俩为什么就认为你应该替他们女儿买条裙子。做妈妈的应该很清楚她自己的女儿和你一点关系都没有啊。听说他们这个女儿还凶得很，铁了心的说是“长女”就是要就我的一切事物做决定并且还不需要我知道甚至听说她都决定了些什么。如果是真，我是一点不会客气，一切交给我自己的律师按法律处理。
听说了今天早上的广播谈到来自中华人民共和国的困扰说为什么那是我的基金。
我的回应：那是根据我自己祖爷爷的界定。让我来解释一下。
我的祖爷爷（我爷爷A），也就是设立这个信托的那个人在他的信里（遗嘱里）界定了一个由他自己的哪个儿子（我爷爷B）所出的家族继承胎记一支的一个有着家族继承胎记的女儿是这个信托的唯一受益人。遗嘱信中所界定的那个儿子（我爷爷B）是一个有家族继承胎记的儿子。
我爷爷B，也就是我爷爷A在他自己所立遗嘱里所界定的继承人儿子，没有生出一个有继承胎记的女儿而是生了一个有继承胎记的儿子（我爷爷C）。所以，我爷爷B就通知了那些照看着这个信托的人，这个信托的继承胎记女受益人将是由他这个有继承胎记的儿子（我爷爷C）这支所出的。
就这样一代又一代，直到我爷爷方智仁这一代。我的父亲方文海是我爷爷方智仁所出的有继承胎记的儿子。所以我爷爷方智仁就通知了那些照看着这个信托的人，这个信托的继承胎记女受益人将是由他这个有继承胎记的儿子方文海这支所出的。
我是1967年出生，我的家族胎记掌纹和我父亲方文海的胎记掌纹几乎是一摸一样的。
这是为什么我说我是按照我祖爷爷（我爷爷A）的遗嘱继承了我祖爷爷（我爷爷A）所设立的这个信托。那个基金是由我所继承的这个信托所设立的，所以我说那是我的基金。
今天早上的播出的是”信托是为方智仁的孙女即方智仁的长子方文海所出的女儿方敏所设立的。“
----2017年12月12日发布
----January 1st, 2018
